<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary proxy statement
[X] Definitive proxy statement
[ ] Definitive additional materials
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
[ ] Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
---------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required.
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 0-11 and 14a-6(i)(4).
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined): Value of Transaction:
$187,600,000, based upon the purchase price, subject to adjustment, to be
received by the Registrant in the sale of substantially all of its assets
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: $187,600,000 (see line 3
above)
(5) Total fee paid: $37,520
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
$37,520
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
File No. 1-11471
(3) Filing party:
Bell Industries, Inc.
(4) Date filed:
October 20, 1998
<PAGE> 2
[BELL LOGO]
2201 E. EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245-4608
December 23, 1998
DEAR SHAREHOLDER:
The Board of Directors of BELL INDUSTRIES, INC. has agreed to sell BELL's
Electronics Distribution Group, constituting approximately 71% of BELL's total
assets, to Arrow Electronics, Inc., for approximately $185 million, subject to
adjustment.
BELL intends to use the proceeds from this sale to --
- - repay substantially all of its bank debt, totaling approximately $108 million
as of November 30, 1998, then
- - distribute to BELL shareholders during the second quarter of 1999
substantially all of the proceeds remaining after payment of taxes and
expenses related to the sale.
The amount of the distribution to BELL shareholders will be $50 million to $60
million. We will accomplish this by making a pro-rata distribution to all
shareholders or by purchasing BELL shares during the second quarter of 1999.
Following the sale, Bell intends to sell certain real estate assets for
estimated net proceeds of $10 million to $15 million. Such net proceeds would
also be distributed to shareholders. Bell anticipates that such distribution
would occur during the latter part of 1999.
After the sale, BELL will be substantially smaller and will focus on its
remaining businesses, which historically have been profitable. For the year
ended December 31, 1997 and the nine month period ended September 30, 1998,
these remaining businesses had sales of $194.6 million and $160.8 million and
operating income of $13 million and $9.5 million, before corporate costs. BELL
expects its corporate costs will be substantially lower after the sale of the
Electronics Distribution Group, and it will endeavor to restructure its
operations to realize these savings.
This sale requires the approval of BELL's shareholders. We will hold a
Shareholders' Meeting to vote to approve the sale on Tuesday, January 26, 1999,
at 10:00 a.m., at our headquarters, 2201 E. El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo,
California.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Because approval of at least a majority of the
outstanding shares of Bell's common stock is required to approve the sale,
failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote against the sale.
Accordingly, please complete the enclosed proxy card and return it in the
enclosed envelope.
I strongly support the sale to Arrow and join with the other members of the
Board of Directors in enthusiastically recommending this transaction to you.
Sincerely yours,
GORDON GRAHAM
President
<PAGE> 3
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
2201 E. EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245-4608
NOTICE OF A SPECIAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held Tuesday, January 26, 1999
A Special Meeting of Shareholders of BELL INDUSTRIES, INC., a California
corporation, will be held at 2201 E. El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo,
California, on Tuesday, January 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., (the "SPECIAL
MEETING"), to vote upon the proposed sale of the Company's Electronics
Distribution Group, constituting approximately 71% of the Company's total
assets, to Arrow Electronics, Inc., for approximately $185 million, subject to
adjustment, all as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
The Board of Directors of the Company believes that the sale is in the best
interests of the Company and its shareholders and has unanimously approved it
and recommends that you vote FOR its approval.
Applicable law requires approval of the sale by holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company.
The Board has fixed the close of business on December 4, 1998, as the record
date ("RECORD DATE") for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote at
the Special Meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the
Record Date will be entitled to vote. A list of the Company's shareholders
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting will be available for examination during
regular business hours at the Company's offices during the 10 days prior to the
Special Meeting.
The matters discussed in the enclosed Proxy Statement are extremely important.
You are urged to consider carefully the proposal being presented.
Whether or not you expect to attend the Special Meeting in person, please
complete and return the accompanying proxy without delay in the enclosed postage
prepaid envelope.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John J. Cost, Secretary
December 23, 1998
<PAGE> 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
INTRODUCTION........................ 1
General........................... 1
Voting; Proxies................... 2
Persons Making the Solicitation... 2
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT.......... 3
The Parties....................... 3
The Sale.......................... 3
The Special Meeting............... 6
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS................. 8
MARKET PRICE DATA................... 8
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA............. 9
SELECTED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA... 11
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SALE.... 12
General........................... 12
Use of Proceeds from the Sale..... 12
Reasons for the Sale and
Recommendation of the Board.... 13
Background of the Sale............ 15
Opinion of the Company's Financial
Advisor........................ 19
Interests of Certain Persons...... 24
Accounting Treatment; Federal
Income Tax Consequences........ 26
DESCRIPTION OF BELL................. 27
General........................... 27
Electronics Distribution.......... 27
Recent Developments............... 29
Remaining Businesses.............. 29
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.............. 33
DESCRIPTION OF ARROW................ 42
AVAILABLE INFORMATION............... 42
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS........................ 43
General........................... 43
Results of Operations............. 44
First Nine Months of 1998 Compared
With First Nine Months of
1997........................... 45
1997 Compared With 1996........... 47
1996 Compared With 1995........... 47
Financial Condition............... 48
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS........................ 50
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS.................. 50
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACQUISITION
AGREEMENT......................... 51
Assets To Be Sold................. 51
Certain Covenants................. 53
DESCRIPTION OF THE OPTION
AGREEMENT......................... 55
INFORMATION REGARDING
SHAREHOLDERS...................... 55
Principal Security Holders........ 55
Security Ownership of Management
and Directors.................. 56
OTHER MATTERS....................... 57
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS............. 57
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE......................... 57
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS....... 58
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS....... F-1
APPENDIX............................
Opinion of Financial Advisor........
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 5
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
2201 E. EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245-4608
-------------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
-------------------------
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1999
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being sent to
shareholders of Bell Industries, Inc., a California corporation (the "COMPANY"
or "BELL"), on or about December 23, 1998. The accompanying proxy is solicited
by the Board of Directors of the Company (the "BOARD") for use at the Special
Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at 2201 E. El Segundo
Boulevard, El Segundo, California on Tuesday, January 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m.
local time (the "SPECIAL MEETING"). The purpose of the Special Meeting is to
vote upon the sale of the Company's Electronics Distribution Group ("EDG"),
constituting approximately 71% of the Company's total assets, to Arrow
Electronics, Inc., a New York corporation ("ARROW"), for approximately $185
million, subject to adjustment (the "SALE").
The Board believes that the Sale is in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders and unanimously recommends your vote in favor. The factors
considered by the Board in approving the Sale are set forth under the caption
"Description of the Proposed Sale -- Reasons for the Sale and Recommendation of
the Board; Background of the Sale" on pages 13 through 18.
The Company intends to use the proceeds from the Sale to repay substantially all
of its bank debt, which is estimated to range between $100 million and $110
million at the time the Sale closes, and then distribute to its shareholders
substantially all of the proceeds remaining after payment of taxes and expenses
related to the Sale. This distribution will take place after any purchase price
adjustments are made (anticipated to be completed 90 days after the closing of
the Sale). The amount of the distribution to the Company's shareholders will be
$50 million to $60 million. The Company intends to distribute this amount by
making a pro-rata distribution to all shareholders or by purchasing Company
common stock. Following the sale, Bell intends to sell its remaining real estate
assets for estimated net proceeds of $10 million to $15 million. Such net
proceeds would also be distributed to shareholders. Bell anticipates that such
distribution would occur during the latter part of 1999. After the Sale, the
Company will focus on its remaining businesses, which historically have been
profitable. See "Description of the Proposed Sale -- Use of Proceeds from the
Sale; Description of the Acquisition Agreement -- Purchase Price Adjustment."
Shareholders of the Company's common stock (the "COMMON STOCK") of record at the
close of business on December 4, 1999 (the "RECORD DATE") are entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting. On the Record Date, there were
approximately 9.5 million shares of Common Stock outstanding.
1
<PAGE> 6
VOTING; PROXIES
The presence, either in person or by proxy, of persons entitled to vote a
majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is necessary to constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business at the Special Meeting. Shareholders will
be entitled to cast one vote on the Sale for each share of Common Stock held on
the Record Date. In order for the Sale to be approved, the votes cast in favor
must constitute at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Due to this required majority vote, abstentions and failures to vote will have
the same effect as a vote against approval of the Sale.
Properly executed and returned proxies, unless revoked, will be voted as
directed by the shareholder, or, in the absence of such direction, by the
persons named therein FOR the approval of the Sale. A proxy may be revoked at
any time before it is voted by delivery of written notice of revocation to the
Secretary of the Company, or by delivery of a later dated proxy, or by
attendance at the Special Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the
Special Meeting without also voting will not in and of itself constitute the
revocation of a proxy.
PERSONS MAKING THE SOLICITATION
This solicitation of proxies is being made by the Board of Directors of Bell.
All expenses associated with soliciting proxies, including the preparation,
assembly, printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement, will be paid by Bell. In
addition, Bell may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing
beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation
materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited by certain
Bell directors, officers and regular employees personally or by telephone,
telegram, letter or facsimile. Such persons will not receive additional
compensation, but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with such solicitation. In addition, Bell has retained
MacKenzie Partners to assist in the solicitation of proxies from brokers,
nominees, institutions and individuals at an estimated fee of $6,500 plus
reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Arrangements will also be made with
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding of proxy solicitation
materials to beneficial owners of shares held of record by them, and Bell will
reimburse them for their reasonable expenses.
2
<PAGE> 7
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT
The following is a brief summary of certain information contained in the Proxy
Statement. Shareholders are urged to review carefully the entire Proxy
Statement.
THE PARTIES
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation, is primarily a national
distributor of electronic components, which business comprised 61% of 1997
consolidated sales (74% after giving effect to the disposition of Bell's
graphics imaging business in September of 1998, as described in "Recent
Developments"). In addition, Bell's operations include computer systems
integration; distribution of after-market products for recreational vehicles,
motorcycles, snowmobiles, and powerboats; and two electronics manufacturing
divisions. These businesses will continue to be operated by Bell after the Sale.
Bell's principal executive office is located at 2201 E. El Segundo Boulevard, El
Segundo, California 90245-4608. Its telephone number is (310) 563-2355.
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC., a New York corporation, is the world's largest
distributor of electronic components and computer products to industrial and
commercial customers. Arrow maintains over 200 sales facilities and 26
distribution centers in 32 countries. Arrow's address is 25 Hub Drive, Melville,
New York 11747. Its telephone number is (516) 391-1300.
THE SALE
Description of Assets Being Sold. Shareholders are being asked to approve the
sale of Bell's Electronics Distribution Group ("EDG"), a component of Bell's
Electronics Group segment, to Arrow for approximately $185 million, subject to
adjustment. For fiscal 1997 and the nine month period ended September 30, 1998,
EDG accounted for 74% and 69% of consolidated sales and 66% and 52% of
consolidated operating income. At September 30, 1998, EDG's total assets were
71% of Bell's total assets. (All of the preceding percentages are after giving
effect to the sale of Bell's graphics imaging business in September 1998.) EDG
sells the following electronic components products to over 10,000 customers in
North America: semiconductors (Dallas Semiconductor, IBM Microelectronics,
Maxim, Microchip, NEC, Samsung, Sharp, ST Microelectronics); passive components
(Aromat, AVX, Bourns, Murata, Vishay); connectors (Berg); and board-level
products. EDG also provides value-added services, including: kitting; turnkey;
SMART (an automated replenishment system); assembly of custom cables; harnesses
and connectors; contract purchasing; and direct programming of chips. EDG is
based in El Segundo, California and markets electronic components from more than
30 sales facilities located throughout the United States and Canada to a broad
base of customers and markets.
Use of Proceeds. The Sale is anticipated to result in the Company receiving
approximately $185 million in gross proceeds, subject to adjustment. See
"Description of the Acquisition Agreement -- Purchase Price Adjustment."
From the proceeds, the Company will pay various transaction related costs,
including estimated legal, advisory, and banking costs of $5 million, estimated
employee separation and related exit costs of $12 million, and estimated taxes
of $9 million. The Company
3
<PAGE> 8
intends to use a substantial portion of the proceeds to pay off its indebtedness
under its secured revolving bank credit facility (the "CREDIT FACILITY"), which
is estimated to range between $100 million to $110 million at the time the Sale
closes. Accordingly, after the transaction cost and debt payments, the Company
estimates that it will have approximately $50 million to $60 million of
additional cash ("ADDITIONAL CASH").
The Company intends to use the Additional Cash to make a cash distribution to
its shareholders, ranging between $50 million and $60 million. This distribution
will be accomplished by making a pro-rata distribution to all shareholders of
the Company or by purchasing Company Common Stock. In either case, the
distribution will take place after any purchase price adjustments are made in
accordance with the Acquisition Agreement (anticipated to be completed 90 days
after the closing of the Sale). See "Description of the Acquisition
Agreement -- Purchase Price Adjustment." Following the sale, Bell intends to
sell certain real estate assets for estimated net proceeds of $10 million to $15
million. These real estate assets have an aggregate net book value of $10.2
million and consist of the Company's corporate office and properties used by the
Recreational Products Group (1 property), EDG (2 properties), and the
discontinued Graphics Imaging Group (2 properties). Such net proceeds would also
be distributed to shareholders. Bell anticipates that such distribution would
occur during the latter part of 1999.
After the Sale, the Company will be substantially smaller and will focus on its
remaining businesses (the "REMAINING BUSINESSES"). See "Remaining Business." For
the nine months ended September 30, 1998, the Remaining Businesses accounted for
approximately 31% of consolidated sales and 48% of consolidated operating
income, before corporate costs and interest. (These percentages are after giving
effect to the sale of Bell's graphics imaging business in September 1998. See
"Recent Developments."). The Company expects its corporate costs will be
substantially lower after the Sale of EDG, and it will endeavor to restructure
its operations to realize these savings.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Board has
unanimously concluded that the Sale is in the best interests of the Company and
its shareholders and unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR its
approval.
Reasons for the Sale. The electronics distribution industry in the United States
has experienced two significant trends over the past five years: consolidation
and international expansion. Bell believes these trends arise from major
suppliers and customers of the electronics distributors. The suppliers wish to
minimize their costs of selling product and believe that reducing the number of
distributors is one method. The suppliers also wish to increase their worldwide
market share and thus tend to prefer and retain those distributors that have
international distribution capability. Also, customers with worldwide operations
prefer to deal with distributors that have similar capabilities. Additionally,
original equipment manufacturers, historically distributors' primary customers,
have accelerated subcontracting the production of many electronic assemblies to
contract manufacturers. This has resulted in further concentrating buying power,
causing declines in gross profit margins for all electronics distributors. The
pressure on gross profit margins affects larger distributors to a lesser extent
because they can spread fixed costs over a greater sales volume. These trends
have exacerbated Bell's ability to obtain and retain significant supplier
franchises and large customers. Furthermore, Bell's position with smaller
customers, historically a strength of the business and a focus of its sales
force, is at risk due to the supplier franchise limitations arising from the
adverse trends noted above.
4
<PAGE> 9
Larger distributors with broader product offerings and resources are able to
support the penetration of the smaller customer base more cost effectively.
Bell's Board of Directors believes that because of the consolidation and
worldwide expansion that has been prevalent in the electronics distribution
industry over the last few years, the position of EDG could deteriorate with
time due to the loss of product lines, employees and customers. Bell's Board of
Directors further believes that, as a segment of a larger distributor (such as
Arrow), EDG has greater potential than it has as part of Bell. Based upon these
factors, the Board concluded that it was in the best interests of the
shareholders to sell EDG upon the terms, and at the price, offered by Arrow. See
"Description of The Acquisition Agreement." In arriving at this conclusion, the
Board also considered the opinion of Lincoln Partners LLC, the Company's
financial advisor in connection with the proposed Sale. See "Opinion of the
Company's Financial Advisor."
Opinion of Financial Advisor. Lincoln Partners LLC ("LINCOLN PARTNERS"), the
Company's financial advisor in connection with the Sale, rendered an oral
opinion on September 29, 1998, which was confirmed by delivery of a written
opinion dated December 1, 1998, to the effect that the consideration to be
received by the Company in the Sale was fair, from a financial point of view, to
the Company. AS THE SALE DOES NOT CONTEMPLATE THE DIRECT RECEIPT BY BELL'S
SHAREHOLDERS OF ANY CONSIDERATION FROM ARROW, THE OPINION DOES NOT ADDRESS THE
QUESTION OF ITS FAIRNESS, FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW, TO BELL'S
SHAREHOLDERS. See "Description of the Proposed Sale; Opinion of the Company's
Financial Advisor." A copy of the opinion of Lincoln Partners LLC, which sets
forth the assumptions made, matters considered and the scope of their review, is
attached to this Proxy Statement as an Appendix.
Acquisition Agreement. The Sale will be accomplished pursuant to an Agreement of
Purchase and Sale (the "ACQUISITION AGREEMENT"). See "Description of the
Acquisition Agreement." The Acquisition Agreement provides for the sale by Bell
to Arrow of all of the assets of EDG and the assumption by Arrow of
substantially all of the related liabilities. The gross proceeds from the Sale
are estimated to be approximately $185 million, subject to adjustment. The
Acquisition Agreement provides for a positive (not to exceed $10 million) or
negative purchase price adjustment if the Company's net investment in EDG is
greater or less than $155 million and the right of Arrow to terminate the
Acquisition Agreement if, among other reasons, the net investment in EDG is less
than $135 million at closing. The Acquisition Agreement provides for customary
representations, covenants, closing conditions and indemnification rights. The
indemnification rights will survive for two years from the closing or until such
time as Bell's remaining businesses may be sold, whichever is earlier. Bell
would be required to pay Arrow termination fees of $5,000,000 in the event that
Bell terminates the Acquisition Agreement either (i) in connection with its
acceptance of an alternative proposal to acquire EDG or (ii) if Bell's
shareholders do not approve the Sale and this Proxy Statement discloses any such
alternative proposal. If the Proxy Statement does not disclose any alternative
proposal and Bell's shareholders do not approve the Sale, Bell must pay Arrow
$750,000. In addition, if the Sale does not close due to a willful breach of a
condition to closing by either Bell or Arrow, the party in breach must pay to
the other party an expense reimbursement of $5,000,000.
Option Agreement. As a condition to the Sale, Arrow has required that the
Company grant it an option (the "OPTION") to purchase up to approximately 19.9%
of the
5
<PAGE> 10
Company's Common Stock outstanding on the date of the Acquisition Agreement, or
1,888,000 shares, at an exercise price of $10.531 per share. The exercise price
was based on the average of the closing prices of the Company's Common Stock for
the ten days prior to announcement of the Sale. The Option becomes exercisable
by Arrow only if one or more of the following events occur, and for 180 days
after any such occurrence: (1) the Company terminates the Acquisition Agreement
to pursue another transaction; (2) the Company's shareholders fail to approve
the Sale where this Proxy Statement discloses an alternative transaction, or (3)
the Company willfully breaches a closing condition in the Acquisition Agreement.
In addition, Arrow has a right to require the Company to repurchase at a formula
price the Option or the shares acquired by Arrow if it has exercised the Option.
This formula price would be the exercise price of the Option plus an amount
equal to the excess of the market price for the Common Stock over the exercise
price or, if higher, the price offered for the Common Stock by a third party
tender offeror. If the Option is exercised, Bell also grants Arrow registration
rights on the shares issued to Arrow pursuant to the Option. A Stock Option
Agreement dated the same date as the Acquisition Agreement defines the terms and
conditions of the Option in detail and is filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K, event date October 1, 1998.
Interests of Certain Persons. The Company has severance agreements with its
executive officers, including Messrs. Graham, Edwards, Hough and Weeks. Each of
these agreements provides, in essence, that, should there be a "change in
control" (which would include the Sale) and the officer's employment is
terminated under certain circumstances, the officer would be entitled to receive
a severance payment. The Company also has an Executive Deferred Income and
Pension Plan, which also provides for change in control payments. If any of
Messrs. Graham, Edwards, Hough or Weeks is terminated without cause after a
change in control, he will receive a lump sum payment equal to all amounts that
have accrued for his benefit up to the date of his termination under that plan.
Mr. Edwards is expected to continue his employment with the Company. Aggregate
payments under the severance agreements and plan are not anticipated to exceed
$2 million. Pursuant to a non-employee directors' retirement plan, Messrs. Cost
and Rosenberg are entitled to annual retirement benefits. Further, in the event
of a change of control of the Company accompanied by a cessation of their
services as a director, each could elect to receive a lump sum payment equal to
the present value of his retirement benefit (aggregate of approximately
$700,000). Also, under the Company's stock option plan, the Sale would cause the
vesting of certain stock options to accelerate and become immediately
exercisable. Currently, such options are "out of the money."
Accounting Treatment; Federal Income Tax Consequences. The Sale is expected to
result in a significant accounting loss of approximately $60 million to $65
million. However, due primarily to the existence of nondeductible goodwill, Bell
expects to realize a gain for tax purposes. Because the Sale is solely a
corporate action, it has no tax impact on shareholders.
THE SPECIAL MEETING
Date, Time and Place of The Special Meeting. The Special Meeting will be held at
2201 E. El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, California 90245-4608, on Tuesday,
January 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m.
6
<PAGE> 11
Purpose. The purpose of the Special Meeting is to consider and vote upon the
approval of the Sale and such other matters as may properly be brought before
it. Management is not aware of any such other matters.
Record Date and Outstanding Shares. Shareholders of record of Common Stock at
the close of business on December 4, 1998 (the "Record Date") are entitled to
notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting. As of the Record Date, there
were approximately 1,500 shareholders of record and approximately 9.5 million
shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Vote Required. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common
Stock outstanding as of the Record Date is required to approve the Sale. The
effect of abstentions and broker non-votes is the same as that of a vote
"against" the proposal. Each shareholder of record of Common Stock on the Record
Date will be entitled to cast one vote per share on the proposal to approve the
Sale. Bell's directors and its executive officers have given Arrow irrevocable
proxies to vote their shares (approximately 446,000 shares, or 5% of the
outstanding shares) at the Special Meeting. Arrow has advised Bell that it
intends to vote these shares FOR the approval of the Sale.
Proxies. Each of the persons named as proxies in the proxy is an officer of
Bell. All shares of Common Stock that are entitled to vote and represented at
the Special Meeting either in person or by valid executed proxies will be voted
at the Special Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on such
proxies. If no such instructions are indicated, such proxies will be voted FOR
the approval of the Sale.
Any proxy may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is voted.
Proxies may be revoked by (i) filing with the Secretary of Bell before the
taking of the vote at the Special Meeting, a written notice of revocation
bearing a later date; (ii) duly executing a later-dated proxy relating to the
same shares and delivering it to the Secretary of Bell before the taking of the
vote at the Special Meeting; or (iii) attending the Special Meeting and voting
in person (although attendance at the Special Meeting will not in and of itself
constitute a revocation of a proxy). Any written notice of revocation or
subsequent proxy should be sent so as to be delivered to Bell at 2201 E. El
Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, California 90245-4608, Attention: Secretary, or
hand-delivered to the Secretary of Bell, before the taking of the vote at the
Special Meeting.
Dissenters' Rights. There are no dissenters' rights under California law
available to shareholders in connection with the Sale.
7
<PAGE> 12
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Bell recently completed the sale of its graphics imaging business ("GRAPHICS")
to PrimeSource Corporation. The net proceeds (approximately $40 million) from
that sale are being used to reduce debt under the Credit Facility. Graphics
distributed graphics and electronic imaging supplies and equipment throughout
the upper Midwest and Western United States to the advertising and printing
industries. Major product lines distributed by the group included film, plates,
chemicals and other printing supplies from Agfa, DuPont, Eastman Kodak, Imation,
Konica, and Western Litho as well as prepress and related electronic imaging
equipment from Agfa, Apple, Howtek, Intergraph, and Screen. For the year ended
December 31, 1997 and the six month period ended June 30, 1998, Graphics
reported sales of $156.3 million and $71.5 million and operating income of $4.4
million and $2.7 million, respectively.
MARKET PRICE DATA
The Company's Common Stock is listed on the New York and Pacific Stock Exchanges
under the trading symbol "BI." The high and low prices per share on the New York
Stock Exchange of Common Stock on September 30, 1998, the day before the Company
announced the proposed Sale, were $12.375 and $11.875. The high and low prices
per share on the New York Stock Exchange on December 22, 1998, the day before
the mailing of this Proxy Statement, were $10.75 and $10.4375. As of November
30, 1998, the Company had 9.5 million shares of Common Stock outstanding,
approximately 1,500 shareholders of record and approximately 5,000 beneficial
holders.
8
<PAGE> 13
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth certain selected financial data which should be
read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of
Bell appearing elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX
MONTHS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 ENDED YEAR ENDED JUNE 30
------------------------------ DEC. 31 -------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994(8) 1994 1993
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING RESULTS
Net sales(10)........................................... $734,449 $506,062 $490,966 $224,941 $392,389 $309,913
Operating income(3)(4)(11).............................. $ 26,651 $ 27,526 $ 30,230 $ 10,130 $ 18,816 $ 12,088
Income from continuing operations, before extraordinary
loss(5)............................................... $ 7,519 $ 13,861 $ 13,810 $ 4,779 $ 8,257 $ 3,774
Net income (loss)(7)(9)................................. $ 9,406 $ 15,927 $ 14,971 $ 5,619 $ 9,075 $ (5,025)
Capital expenditures.................................... $ 16,057 $ 8,494 $ 4,445 $ 1,257 $ 2,359 $ 5,412
Depreciation and amortization........................... $ 9,196 $ 5,736 $ 5,755 $ 2,831 $ 5,462 $ 4,903
FINANCIAL POSITION
Working capital......................................... $208,012 $132,856 $136,227 $116,118 $107,455 $ 97,710
Total assets............................................ $431,233 $241,310 $233,882 $200,367 $184,713 $175,272
Long-term liabilities................................... $178,825 $ 30,584 $ 43,490 $ 40,936 $ 39,972 $ 47,569
Shareholders' equity.................................... $151,352 $138,461 $117,569 $101,770 $ 95,553 $ 86,288
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA(6)
BASIC
Income from continuing operations, before extraordinary
loss.................................................. $ .82 $ 1.57 $ 1.60 $ .56 $ .97 $ .44
Net income (loss)....................................... $ 1.03 $ 1.80 $ 1.74 $ .66 $ 1.06 $ (.59)
Weighted average common shares (000's).................. 9,157 8,853 8,626 8,565 8,529 8,507
DILUTED
Income from continuing operations, before extraordinary
loss.................................................. $ .80 $ 1.52 $ 1.54 $ .54 $ .95 $ .44
Net income (loss)....................................... $ 1.00 $ 1.75 $ 1.67 $ .64 $ 1.04 $ (.59)
Weighted average common shares (000's).................. 9,430 9,109 8,940 8,790 8,700 8,580
Shareholders' equity.................................... $ 16.23 $ 15.35 $ 13.53 $ 11.83 $ 11.19 $ 9.69
Market price -- high.................................... $ 20.00 $ 18.45 $ 20.34 $ 17.29 $ 14.22 $ 10.18
Market price -- low..................................... $ 12.00 $ 12.50 $ 14.08 $ 11.91 $ 9.63 $ 6.40
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30
-----------------------
1998 1997
-------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING RESULTS
Net sales(11)............................................... $521,172 $559,523
Operating income(1)(3)(11).................................. $ 11,550 $ 20,729
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before
extraordinary loss(2)..................................... $ (6,285) $ 6,204
Net income (loss)(7)(10).................................... $ (2,640) $ 7,431
Capital expenditures........................................ $ 6,299 $ 12,870
Depreciation and amortization............................... $ 6,995 $ 6,937
FINANCIAL POSITION
Working capital............................................. $159,874 $208,012
Total assets................................................ $360,529 $431,233
Long-term liabilities....................................... $121,815 $178,820
Shareholders' equity........................................ $150,225 $151,352
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA(6)
BASIC
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before
extraordinary loss........................................ $ (.67) $ .68
Net income (loss)........................................... $ (.28) $ .82
Weighted average common shares (000's)...................... 9,385 9,118
DILUTED
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before
extraordinary loss........................................ $ (.67) $ .66
Net income (loss)........................................... $ (.28) $ .79
Weighted average common shares (000's)...................... 9,385 9,401
Shareholders' equity........................................ $ 15.83 $ 16.23
Market price -- high........................................ $ 14.25 $ 20.00
Market price -- low......................................... $ 9.00 $ 13.13
</TABLE>
9
<PAGE> 14
FOOTNOTES TO SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
- -------------------------
(1) Includes before-tax resizing charge ($3,900) in 1998.
(2) Includes before-tax resizing charge ($1,900) and business system charge
($8,000) in 1998.
(3) Includes before-tax integration charge ($4,100) in 1997.
(4) Includes before-tax gain on sale of division ($3,050) in 1995.
(5) Includes before-tax provision for lease commitment ($2,800) in 1995.
(6) Share and per share data has been adjusted to give effect to a 20% stock
dividend declared in May 1997, 5% stock dividends declared in May 1996 and
1995, and October 1994, and 4% stock dividend declared in July 1993.
(7) Includes loss on early retirement of debt ($675) in 1997.
(8) During the six months ended December 31, 1994, the Company changed its year
end from June 30 to December 31.
(9) Includes income from discontinued operations ($2,562) in 1997, ($2,066) in
1996, ($1,161) in 1995, ($530) for the six months ended December 31, 1994,
($818) for the year ended June 30, 1994 and ($131) for the year ended June
30, 1993. Additionally, includes a loss on sale of discontinued operations
($8,100) and a charge for the cumulative effect of accounting change ($830)
for the year ended June 30, 1993.
(10) Includes income from discontinued operations ($1,897) and gain on sale of
discontinued operations ($1,748) in 1998 and income from discontinued
operations ($1,902) in 1997.
(11) The following unaudited financial information sets forth historical sales
and operating income for the businesses of Bell described in this Proxy
Statement:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
------------------- ------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales
EDG...................... $360,337 $409,324 $539,808 $327,354 $346,087
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Remaining Businesses:
Computer systems
integration......... 110,289 94,558 124,680 112,953 73,742
Recreational
products............ 37,897 36,389 46,234 43,704 42,576
Electronics
manufacturing....... 12,649 19,252 23,727 22,051 28,561
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
160,835 150,199 194,641 178,708 144,879
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$521,172 $559,523 $734,449 $506,062 $490,966
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Operating income
EDG(1)(3)................ $ 10,419 $ 18,929 $ 25,144 $ 23,740 $ 25,224
Remaining Businesses:
Computer systems
integration......... 5,227 4,516 5,933 5,692 2,897
Recreational
products............ 2,717 2,452 2,880 3,380 3,536
Electronics
manufacturing(4).... 1,597 3,412 4,230 3,613 7,329
Corporate costs.......... (8,410) (8,580) (11,536) (8,899) (8,756)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ 11,550 $ 20,729 $ 26,651 $ 27,526 $ 30,230
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
10
<PAGE> 15
SELECTED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected pro forma financial data gives effect to the Sale and
distribution in an assumed amount of $55 million to shareholders as described in
this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, such data presents pro forma financial
information regarding the Remaining Businesses without EDG, and after the
proposed distribution to shareholders. The selected pro forma financial position
data assumes the Sale and the distribution to shareholders occurred on September
30, 1998, while the selected pro forma operating results data assumes that the
Sale and the distribution to shareholders occurred on January 1, 1995. The
following table should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated
financial statements of Bell appearing elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This
pro forma financial data does not reflect substantial cost savings expected to
be achieved from a significant restructuring of, and reduction in, Bell's
corporate support structure following the sale of EDG and the recent sale of
Graphics.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
------------------- ------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING RESULTS
Net sales.......................... $160,835 $150,199 $194,641 $178,708 $144,879
Operating income (loss)(a)......... $ (8,769) $ 1,800 $ 1,507 $ 3,786 $ 5,006
Income (loss) from continuing
operations(a).................... $ (5,086) $ 1,044 $ 874 $ 66 $ (815)
Income (loss) from continuing
operations per share:
Basic............................ $ (0.54) $ 0.11 $ 0.10 $ 0.01 $ (0.09)
Diluted.......................... $ (0.54) $ 0.11 $ 0.09 $ 0.01 $ (0.09)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
-------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL POSITION
Working capital.................... $ 11,167
Total assets....................... $ 96,666
Long-term liabilities(b)........... $ 7,105
Shareholders' equity............... $ 32,816
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) Represents the operating income (loss) of the Remaining Businesses after
corporate costs of $8,410 and $8,580 for the nine months ended September 30,
1998 and 1997; and $11,536, $8,899 and $8,756 for the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. In addition, pro forma operating
results for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 include special charges
totaling $9,900. The above trend in the pro forma operating results for the
Remaining Businesses is not indicative of future operations as the Company
expects corporate costs will be substantially lower following the Sale of
EDG, and will restructure its operations to realize these savings. These
anticipated savings are not reflected in the pro forma operating results.
Management expects these annual savings to be approximately $8 million to $9
million, before tax effects, after a restructuring of the Company's
operations following the sale of EDG to bring corporate costs in-line with
the Company's smaller size.
(b) The Company has received preliminary approval from its primary lender for a
line of credit in the amount of $20 million to finance short-term cash flow
and working capital requirements, and longer term needs in expanding the
Remaining Businesses. Management believes that it has access to additional
financing as required.
11
<PAGE> 16
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SALE
GENERAL
The Sale will be accomplished pursuant to an Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement
(the "ACQUISITION AGREEMENT"). See "Description of the Acquisition Agreement."
Bell has also granted Arrow an option pursuant to a Stock Option Agreement (the
"OPTION AGREEMENT"). See "Description of Option Agreement." The Acquisition
Agreement provides for the sale by Bell to Arrow of all of the assets of EDG and
the assumption by Arrow of substantially all of the related liabilities. The
gross proceeds from the Sale are estimated to be approximately $185 million,
subject to adjustment. The Acquisition Agreement provides for customary
representations, covenants, closing conditions and indemnification rights. The
indemnification rights will survive for two years from the closing or, if they
are disposed, until the Remaining Businesses are sold, whichever is earlier.
Bell would be required to pay Arrow termination fees of $5,000,000 in the event
that Bell terminates the Acquisition Agreement either (i) in connection with its
acceptance of an alternative proposal to acquire EDG or (ii) if Bell's
shareholders do not approve the Sale and this Proxy Statement discloses any such
alternative proposal. If this Proxy Statement does not disclose any alternative
proposal and Bell's shareholders do not approve the Sale, Bell must pay Arrow
$750,000. In addition, if the Sale does not close due to a willful breach of a
condition to closing by either Bell or Arrow, the party in breach must pay to
the other party an expense reimbursement of $5,000,000.
USE OF PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE
The Sale is anticipated to result in the Company receiving approximately $185
million in gross proceeds, subject to adjustment. See "Description of the
Acquisition Agreement -- Purchase Price Adjustment." From the proceeds, the
Company will pay various transaction related costs, including estimated legal,
advisory, and banking costs of $5 million, estimated employee separation and
related exit costs of $12 million, and estimated taxes of $9 million. The
Company intends to use a substantial portion of the proceeds to pay off its
indebtedness under its Credit Facility, which is estimated to range between $100
million to $110 million at the time the Sale closes. Accordingly, after
transaction costs and debt payments, the Company estimates that it will have
approximately $50 million to $60 million of additional cash ("ADDITIONAL CASH").
The Company intends to use the Additional Cash to make a cash distribution to
its shareholders of $50 million to $60 million. This distribution will be
accomplished by making a pro-rata distribution to all shareholders or purchasing
Company Common Stock through a tender offer to shareholders. In either case, the
distribution will take place after all purchase price adjustments are made in
accordance with the Acquisition Agreement (anticipated to be completed 90 days
after the closing of the Sale). See "Description of the Acquisition
Agreement -- Purchase Price Agreement." Following the sale, Bell intends to sell
certain real estate assets for estimated net proceeds of $10 million to $15
million. These real estate assets have an aggregate net book value of $10.2
million and consist of the Company's corporate office and properties used by the
Recreational Products Group(1 property), EDG(2 properties), and the discontinued
Graphics Imaging Group(2 properties). Such net proceeds would also be
distributed to shareholders. Bell anticipates that such distribution would occur
during the latter part of fiscal 1999.
12
<PAGE> 17
After the sale, the Company will be substantially smaller and will focus on its
Remaining Businesses, which have historically been profitable. For the year
ended December 31, 1997 and the nine month period ended September 30, 1998,
these Remaining Businesses had sales of $194.6 million and $160.8 million and
operating income of $13 million and $9.5 million, before corporate costs. The
Company expects its corporate costs will be substantially lower following the
Sale of EDG, and it will endeavor to restructure its operations to realize these
savings.
REASONS FOR THE SALE AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD
The electronics distribution industry in the United States has experienced two
significant trends over the past five years: consolidation and international
expansion. Five years ago, an electronics distributor having annual sales over
$750 million was considered a significant distributor by the major electronic
components manufacturers. Currently, significant distributors are those with
annual sales approaching or exceeding $2 billion. At September 30, 1998, there
were six such distributors; and of these, two, Arrow and Avnet, had sales of
over $5 billion. Bell's sales from electronic components distribution were
approximately $330 million and $540 million for 1996 and 1997. (The increase in
sales for 1997 resulted from the acquisition of Milgray Electronics in January
of that year.) Currently, annualized EDG sales are estimated to be $460 million.
Along with consolidation, the larger electronic distributors have been expanding
their operations internationally. For example in 1993, Arrow had sales outside
of North America of approximately $650 million, whereas in 1997 Arrow had
approximately $2.8 billion in such sales.
These trends are believed to be the result of forces emanating from major
suppliers and customers of the electronics distributors. Suppliers wish to
minimize their costs of selling product and believe that reducing the number of
distributors is one method. An example of this trend was the April 1998
announcement by Analog Devices that it was resizing its distribution network;
Bell and Raab Karcher AG both lost their North American franchises with Analog
as a result of this action. For the preceding year, sales of Analog Devices'
products comprised approximately 4% of Bell's revenues. Over the last three
years, Bell has lost other significant franchises: 1996, National Semiconductor
(approximately 8% of revenues); 1997, Fujitsu Microelectronics (approximately 2%
of revenues); 1997, Hitachi (approximately 3% of revenues); 1997, Beckman
Instruments (under 1% of revenues); and 1997, Atmel (approximately 2% of
revenues). Suppliers also wish to increase worldwide market share and thus tend
to prefer and retain distributors that have international distribution
capability. Also, customers with global operations prefer to deal with
distributors that have similar capabilities. Additionally, original equipment
manufacturers, historically distributors' primary customers, have accelerated
subcontracting the production of many electronic assemblies to contract
manufacturers. This results in further concentrating buying power and causing
declines in gross profit margins for all electronics distributors. The pressure
on gross profit margins affects larger distributors to a lesser extent because
they can remain profitable, through greater sales volume, even though selling at
lower gross profit margins. These trends have exacerbated Bell's ability to
obtain and retain significant supplier franchises and large customers.
Furthermore, Bell's position with smaller customers, historically a strength of
its business and the focus of its sales force, is at risk due to the supplier
franchise limitations arising from the adverse trends
13
<PAGE> 18
noted above. Larger distributors with broader product offerings and resources
are able to support the penetration of the smaller customer base more cost
effectively.
Over the past several years, Bell has developed its place in the overall
electronics distribution market by concentrating its selling efforts on the
smaller, so-called "second tier" customer. Currently approximately 90% of its
electronics distribution sales are to this market. Although Bell has been
successful selling into this market, it is more costly selling to many customers
for a fixed volume of sales than it is selling to a smaller number of customers
that generate the same volume. The Board believes that there is a need for one
or more distributors to concentrate on selling to the smaller customer; however,
the Board believes the larger distributors will address this need. For example,
recently, both Avnet and Arrow announced that they were restructuring their
selling organizations into groups that would address specific segments of
customers. The Board understands that Arrow is considering utilizing EDG, in
part, to enhance its position with the smaller customer base. Since Arrow has a
more extensive line of products to offer this customer base (for example, Arrow
has many franchises not available to Bell, including Intel, Motorola, Texas
Instruments, National Semiconductor and Toshiba), Bell's EDG personnel should be
able to generate more sales from the same customer base than did that group as
part of Bell.
Bell's Board of Directors
- believed that because of the consolidation and worldwide expansion that
has been prevalent in the electronics distribution industry over the last
few years, the position of EDG could deteriorate with time due to the
loss of lines, employees and customers;
- believed that, as part of a larger distributor (such as Arrow), EDG is a
more viable organization and has greater potential than as a part of
Bell;
- considered the viability of Bell's Remaining Businesses after the Sale,
including the lower corporate costs Bell expects to achieve, the
competitive environment facing the Remaining Businesses and the reliance
of some of the Remaining Businesses on certain large customers; and
- concluded that it was in the best interests of the shareholders to sell
EDG upon the terms, and at the price, offered by Arrow. See "Description
of Acquisition Agreement."
Each of these factors was deemed by the Board to support the Sale. There were no
other material factors, positive or negative in reaching this conclusion. The
Board was aware that there was a $10 million limitation of the amount the
purchase price could increase in the event Bell's net investment at closing
exceeded $155 million, whereas there was no such limitation on the amount said
purchase price could decrease in the event net investment was less than $155
million. However, the Board considered the probability of any incremental
increase in the net investment in EDG exceeding $10 million to be low, given the
general trends in the electronics distribution business. The Board believed that
only another electronics distributor (such as Arrow) could take advantage of
EDG's sales force and customer base and was likely to offer an acceptable price.
Also, in arriving at it's conclusion that the Sale was in the best interests of
shareholders, the Board considered the opinion of Lincoln Partners LLC ("LINCOLN
PARTNERS"), the Company's financial advisor in connection with the proposed Sale
and Arrow's insistence upon receiving an option to purchase approximately 19.9%
of Bell's common stock. See "Opinion of the Company's Financial Advisor" and
"Description of the Option Agreement." In addition, the Board
14
<PAGE> 19
considered the interests of certain persons discussed under "-- Interests of
Certain Persons." The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered and given weight by the Board is not intended to be exhaustive,
although the Board believes that all material factors are set forth above.
Although the first factor set forth above in bullet points was the most
significant in its decision to recommend the Sale, in view of the variety of
factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Sale, the Board did
not find it practicable to and did not attempt to rank or assign relative
weights to the other foregoing factors. In addition, individual members of the
Board may have given different weights to different factors.
BACKGROUND OF THE SALE
At the time the acquisition of Milgray Electronics was being negotiated
(throughout 1996), Bell believed that the larger sales force of the combined
companies and expanded product line would enable Bell to compete more
effectively and enhance operating results. Due in large part to the trends
discussed under the caption "Reasons for the Sale and Recommendation of the
Board," these expectations were not realized. In the last half of 1997, Bell's
management expressed its concern regarding the future of Bell's electronics
distribution business to Bell's Board of Directors. Management questioned
whether this business would continue to grow and be profitable at acceptable
levels given several trends in the industry, including: the consolidation of
other distributors; the consolidation of distribution networks by suppliers; the
increasing demand by customers for global distribution capabilities; the loss of
product franchises from suppliers; and increased price competition in the
marketplace. The Board then decided that it would be desirable to appoint a
special committee of the Board charged with long-range planning. This committee
was appointed on October 8, 1997, and consisted of Messrs. Cost, Williams,
Rosenberg and Graham. During late 1997, the "long-range planning" committee met
on three occasions. From these meetings, a consensus evolved that management
should seek the interest of others regarding a corporate combination. The
Committee was aware that the sale of Bell in its entirety would be difficult
given the differing nature of its three major businesses, although management
was directed to pursue all options, including a sale of the Company as a whole.
See "Recent Developments" for a description of the sale of Bell's graphics
imaging business.
During late 1997 and into 1998, Bell pursued the following avenues to determine
the level of interest in a combination with another distributor. The Committee
reviewed potential electronics distribution partners with two investment banking
firms and, through these firms, made informal inquiries with two distributors to
solicit interest. In addition, Bell management directly inquired with two
distributors, other than Arrow, to assess interest in a strategic combination.
None of these distributors expressed interest in pursuing negotiations. In
making these inquiries, the Committee believed only another electronics
distributor which could take advantage of EDG's sales force and customer base
would be likely to offer an acceptable price.
In December 1997, Mr. Williams, Bell's Chairman and former Chief Executive
Officer, called Mr. Kaufman, Arrow's President and Chief Executive Officer, to
discuss potential interest and a meeting was arranged.
On January 15, 1998, Mr. Williams and Mr. Graham, Bell's current Chief Executive
Officer, visited Mr. Kaufman in New York. During those discussions, Mr. Graham
indicated that he believed that Bell's EDG would be a good fit for Arrow. Mr.
Kaufman
15
<PAGE> 20
indicated that he had an interest in this possibility. During February, Mr.
Kaufman communicated his interest in touring Bell's new distribution center in
Ontario, California and also requested further information regarding Bell's
sales by supplier, a detailed summary of selling and administrative expenses,
and a summary of corporate expenses. Mr. Kaufman visited Bell's Ontario
warehouse on March 4, 1998. Thereafter, Mr. Kaufman, Mr. Williams, Mr. Graham
and Mr. Edwards (Bell's Executive Vice President) spent several hours going over
the information that Mr. Kaufman had previously requested. These developments
were discussed at Bell's Board of Directors meeting of March 11, 1998.
On March 19, 1998, Mr. Kaufman telephoned Mr. Graham and discussed a very
preliminary valuation ($17 to $18 per share for the entire Company), which was
based on very limited information and the assumption that there would be minimal
overlap in the two companies' customers. After the signing of a non-disclosure
agreement on April 8, 1998 Bell began supplying detailed information concerning
its electronics distribution and other businesses to Arrow.
During the remaining days of April, discussions continued between both parties
concerning valuation. Additionally, Mr. Graham informed Mr. Kaufman that Analog
Devices had notified Bell that it was terminating Bell's franchise to distribute
its products. On April 30, 1998, Mr. Kaufman and Ms. Scheihing, Arrow's Senior
Vice President of Operations, met with Mr. Graham and Mr. Edwards in Denver,
Colorado, to further share information and discuss valuation. At this meeting,
Mr. Kaufman stated his need to conduct a comparison survey of Bell and Arrow's
customers so as to determine whether or not Bell had a different customer base
from Arrow. On May 12, 1998, Mr. Graham and Mr. Kaufman met in Las Vegas at an
industry convention and Mr. Graham stated that he was agreeable to a customer
comparison survey. Bell's independent accountants would conduct this survey and
the names of Bell's customers would not be revealed. This survey was conducted
on May 21 and May 22, 1998 at an Arrow facility in Orange County, California.
The survey was based on a selection of EDG's largest customers in each
metropolitan area served by Bell in North America; such selection represented
approximately 13% of EDG's active customers and approximately 78% of EDG's
annual revenues for 1997. Of the customers surveyed, approximately 25% of the
sales were to customers to which Arrow did not sell; approximately 30% were to
customers to which Arrow sold but had a lower sales volume than EDG; and,
approximately 45% were to customers to which Arrow sold and had a larger sales
volume than EDG. Bell's management considered the results of the survey as being
neutral in that although there was an overlap of some customers, there were also
many customers that were not common.
On June 11, 1998, Mr. Graham and Mr. Edwards met with Mr. Kaufman and Mr.
Klatell, Arrow's Executive Vice President, in New York. At that meeting it was
determined that Arrow had no interest in any of Bell's businesses other than EDG
and that Arrow would make it a condition of any purchase of Bell stock that all
other businesses be previously sold. During that meeting, the Arrow executives
indicated favoring an asset sale of Bell's electronics distribution business
whereas the Bell officers favored a sale of the entire company. On June 24,
1998, Mr. Kaufman met with Mr. Graham and Mr. Edwards in Los Angeles. During
this meeting, the structure (i.e. purchase of EDG alone versus purchase of
entire company) was again discussed and Mr. Graham requested an updated
indication of price from Mr. Kaufman based upon their evaluation to date, which
included the customer overlap analysis, an analysis of operating cost structures
and potential
16
<PAGE> 21
efficiencies, and recent trends in gross margin performance. On June 26, 1998
Mr. Kaufman called Mr. Graham and indicated a valuation of $17 per share for
Bell's stock, assuming a valuation of EDG at $215 million and the disposition of
the non-EDG businesses for at least $152 million, but also emphasized that Arrow
favored an asset purchase of EDG alone. He confirmed Arrow's view that any
transaction which involved acquiring all of Bell would have to be contingent
upon the sale of Bell's other businesses (i.e., Graphics and the Remaining
Businesses). On July 3, 1998, Lincoln Partners LLC, was hired to assist the
Board in evaluating any offer regarding the sale of either Bell (as a whole) or
EDG on a stand-alone basis.
On July 7, 1998, Bell's Board of Directors met in Los Angeles to discuss Arrow's
June 26, 1998 valuation. At that meeting, representatives from Lincoln Partners
made a presentation regarding Arrow's preliminary valuation, which included
comparisons of other recent combinations of electronics distribution businesses.
Lincoln concluded that Arrow's valuation was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Bell. After much discussion, the Board unanimously gave its approval to
management to proceed further with the negotiations with Arrow. The following
day Mr. Graham called Mr. Kaufman and stated that Bell's Board had authorized
him to proceed. Mr. Kaufman stated that his attorneys would be contacting Bell's
attorneys. On July 10, 1998, Irell & Manella LLP, Bell's attorneys, received a
telephone call from Mr. Kelberg of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, Arrow's
attorneys to discuss the structure of the transaction. On Monday, July 13, 1998,
a telephone conference call was held with Mr. Kaufman and Mr. Klatell from Arrow
and Mr. Graham and Mr. Edwards from Bell. During that conversation, it was
agreed to structure the transaction as a sale of EDG's assets because of the
complexities involved in having to sell several distinct businesses (EDG,
Graphics, the Computer Division, the Recreational Products Group and the two
electronic manufacturing divisions) to several different buyers, concurrently.
During the week of July 13, 1998, Bell's management, investment bankers and
attorneys analyzed the asset sale transaction. Also during that week and the
following week, Arrow's attorneys and Bell's attorneys had several telephone
conversations regarding the proposed transaction. Additionally, Mr. Reilly,
Arrow's Vice President and Corporate Controller spent two days in Los Angeles at
Bell's executive offices gathering information. These conversations included
discussions of detailed financial information concerning certain components of
EDG's June 30, 1998 balance sheet including, Bell's net investment in EDG as of
June 30, 1998, a summary of lease commitments, an analysis of EDG's reserves and
annual expenses, Bell's credit agreement and related documents, information
regarding the Ontario Industrial Revenue Bonds, Bell's Federal and state tax
returns and information regarding EDG's inventory. On July 24, 1998, Mr. Kaufman
called Mr. Graham to inform him that Arrow's Board of Directors had given its
preliminary approval to the transaction as a sale of assets. On July 28, 1998,
Bell's Board of Directors met and also gave unanimous preliminary approval of an
asset sale of its electronics distribution business. Such preliminary approval
was based upon a purchase price of $215 million assuming a net investment in EDG
at closing of $155 million. (The net investment in EDG represents the difference
between the assets to be acquired and the liabilities to be assumed which at
June 30, 1998 was $155 million.) By telephone, Bell's investment bankers advised
the Board that they believed they could opine that such an asset sale
transaction would be "fair to Bell from a financial point of view."
17
<PAGE> 22
During the month of August 1998, Arrow continued to conduct its due diligence
examination of EDG. Additionally, drafts of an asset purchase agreement and
related documents were circulated and negotiated among Bell, Arrow and their
advisors. Among the items negotiated were the nature of Bell's representations
and warranties, the terms of Arrow's option, the break-up fees, the liabilities
being assumed, the exact assets being purchased, the length of Bell's
indemnification regarding breaches, the manner of payment of the purchase price,
and the method of valuing Bell's net investment in EDG (the difference between
the assets to be acquired and the liabilities to be assumed). In early
September, Mr. Klatell called Mr. Graham stating Arrow had based its previous
valuation on its assumptions concerning their expected profitability of EDG.
These now required revision due to continued weakness in EDG's profit margins;
thus, he believed that the purchase price must be somewhat reduced. On Monday,
September 21, 1998, Mr. Graham and Mr. Edwards met in Chicago with Mr. Klatell
and Mr. Scricco, Arrow's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer,
along with the attorneys for both parties. At the opening of the meeting, Arrow
stated that it would have to reduce the purchase price for EDG to approximately
$187 million due to the continued weakness in EDG's revenues and profit margins.
While the Bell representatives were considering this lower valuation, the other
major open issues were discussed. Bell then counter-offered for a valuation of
approximately $197 million. Arrow rejected this counter-offer and the parties
then resolved substantially all of the open issues. These issues included
establishing the agreed purchase price (assuming no adjustments) of $187.5
million, that Arrow would pay one-half of any sales tax caused by the Sale,
determining the specific employment contracts to be assumed, defining the
conditions under which Arrow could terminate the Agreement by reason of an
adverse change in the EDG business, agreeing upon the use of the "Bell" name
post-closing, allowing for a $10 million limit to the increase in purchase price
if net investment increased, the nature of Bell's covenant not to compete, and
the method of determining Bell's net investment in EDG. Through numerous
telephone conversations during the remainder of that week, several minor issues
were also resolved. On Tuesday, September 29, 1998, Bell's Board of Directors
met and, after Lincoln Partners had presented its analysis of the transaction
and after reviewing the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement and Option
Agreement, unanimously approved the transaction. At that meeting, Lincoln
Partners advised the Board that the sale of Bell's electronics distribution
business, on the terms described in this Proxy Statement, was fair to Bell from
a financial point of view. The presentations to and the discussions by the Board
were wide ranging and included, among other things, the following: (i) a review
of negotiations conducted to date between the parties, including the reduction
in the offered purchase price; (ii) the presentation by Lincoln Partners of its
financial analysis and (iii) the presentation by Irell & Manella LLP regarding
the then-current status of the negotiations regarding the material terms of the
Acquisition Agreement and the Option Agreement. Members of the Board asked
Lincoln Partners questions about, among other things, valuations of recent
transactions comparable to the Sale, and the assumptions Lincoln Partners made
in arriving at its conclusions. The substance of the Lincoln Partners' response
to these and other questions is set forth below under "-- Opinion of the
Company's Financial Advisor." During a telephone conversation on that date, Bell
and Arrow reached agreement on all open issues, none of which was material. On
October 1, 1998, the Acquisition Agreement was entered into by the parties. At
October 1, 1998, Bell's net investment in EDG was $154.5 million and at November
30, 1998, such investment was $151.7 million.
18
<PAGE> 23
OPINION OF THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Lincoln Partners was retained by Bell to evaluate the fairness of the Sale to
Bell, from a financial point of view. Lincoln Partners delivered to the Bell
Board an oral opinion on September 29, 1998, which was confirmed by delivery of
a written opinion dated December 1, 1998 to the effect that, as of the date of
such opinion and based upon and subject to certain matters stated therein, the
Sale was fair, from a financial point of view, to Bell.
In arriving at its opinion, Lincoln Partners reviewed the Acquisition Agreement
and certain related documents, and held discussions with certain senior
officers, and other representatives and advisors of Bell concerning the
operations and prospects of EDG. In connection with its review of the
Acquisition Agreement, Lincoln Partners was aware that, if the net investment in
EDG shown on a final balance sheet is $155 million, there will be no change to
the final purchase price, and if the net investment is above or below $155
million, then the final purchase price will be increased or decreased
dollar-for-dollar, provided the increase may not exceed $10 million. Lincoln
Partners examined certain available business and financial information relating
to EDG as well as certain financial forecasts and other information and data for
EDG which were provided to or otherwise discussed with Lincoln Partners by the
management of Bell, including information relating to certain implications of
market changes and strategic considerations discussed under Other Factors and
Comparative Analyses below and cost reductions of approximately $8 million to $9
million annually that management of Bell represented to Lincoln Partners were
anticipated to occur at Bell as a result of the Sale. Lincoln Partners reviewed
the financial terms of the Sale as set forth in the Acquisition Agreement in
relation to, among other things, the historical and projected earnings and other
operating data and the financial condition of EDG. Lincoln Partners analyzed
certain financial, stock market and other publicly available information
relating to the businesses of other companies whose operations Lincoln Partners
considered relevant in evaluating the Sale. Lincoln Partners compared financial
terms of certain comparative transactions Lincoln Partners deemed relevant. In
addition to the foregoing, Lincoln Partners conducted such other analyses and
examinations and considered such other financial, economic and market criteria
as Lincoln Partners deemed appropriate in arriving at its opinion. Lincoln
Partners noted that its opinion was necessarily based upon information available
and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing and
disclosed to Lincoln Partners as of the date of its opinion.
In rendering its opinion, Lincoln Partners assumed and relied, without assuming
responsibility for independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness
of all financial and other information and data publicly available or furnished
to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Lincoln Partners by Bell. With
respect to financial forecasts and other information and data provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Lincoln Partners by Bell management,
Bell management advised Lincoln Partners that such forecasts and other
information and data were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments of Bell as to the expected future
financial performance of EDG and the strategic implications and cost reductions
(including the amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated to result
from the Sale. Lincoln Partners did not make and was not provided with an
independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or
otherwise) of EDG nor did Lincoln Partners make any physical inspection of the
properties or assets of EDG.
19
<PAGE> 24
Representatives of Bell advised Lincoln Partners that Arrow will assume
substantially all of the liabilities (as defined in the Acquisition Agreement)
of EDG with the exception of one lawsuit which Bell management represented to
Lincoln Partners was not material to Bell and a portion of one account payable.
In connection with its engagement, Lincoln Partners was not requested to, and
did not, solicit third party indications of interest in all or a part of EDG.
Lincoln Partners was not requested to consider, and Lincoln Partners' opinion
does not address, the relative merits of the Sale as compared to any alternative
business strategies in which Bell might engage. Lincoln Partners was not
retained to advise in the negotiations with Arrow. The Sale purchase price was
determined through negotiation between Bell and Arrow.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE WRITTEN OPINION OF LINCOLN PARTNERS DATED DECEMBER 1, 1998,
WHICH SETS FORTH THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE, MATTERS CONSIDERED AND LIMITATIONS ON THE
REVIEW UNDERTAKEN, IS ATTACHED HERETO AS AN APPENDIX AND SHOULD BE READ
CAREFULLY IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE OPINION OF LINCOLN PARTNERS IS ADDRESSED TO THE
BELL BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND RELATES ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS OF THE SALE FROM A
FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW TO BELL, DOES NOT DEAL WITH ANY OTHER ASPECT OF THE SALE
OR RELATED SALES AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER AS
TO HOW SUCH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD VOTE AT THE BELL MEETING. THE SUMMARY OF THE
OPINION OF LINCOLN PARTNERS SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF SUCH OPINION.
In preparing its opinion, Lincoln Partners performed a variety of financial and
comparative analyses, including those described below. The description of such
analyses contained herein describes in summary form the material elements of the
analyses made by Lincoln Partners in arriving at its opinion. The preparation of
a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial
analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances
and, therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to summary
description. Accordingly, Lincoln Partners believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the following analyses and
factors, without considering all analyses and factors set forth below, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying such analyses
and opinion. In its analyses, Lincoln Partners made numerous assumptions with
respect to EDG, industry performance, general business, economic, market and
financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of
Bell. The estimates contained in such analyses and the valuation ranges
resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual
values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly
more or less favorable than those suggested by such analyses. In addition,
analyses relating to the value of businesses do not purport to be appraisals or
to reflect the prices at which businesses actually may be sold. Accordingly,
such analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty,
which was considered by Lincoln Partners in rendering its opinion. Lincoln
Partners' opinion and analyses were only one of many factors considered by the
Bell Board of Directors in its evaluation of the Sale and should not be viewed
as determinative of the views of the Bell Board of Directors or management with
respect to the proposed Sale.
Analysis of Purchase Price. Lincoln Partners prepared a financial analysis of
the sale of EDG and calculated various multiples based on the estimated cash
consideration of
20
<PAGE> 25
$185 million in cash and $6 million in assumed debt for money borrowed for a
total Sale value of $191 million ("Sale Value"). The three types of multiples
calculated in Analysis of Purchase Price were sale value as a multiple of net
sales, sale value as a multiple of EBITDA, and sale value as a multiple of EBIT.
These multiples were used to create a basis of comparison to measure EDG's
multiples to the multiples calculated for the Comparative Companies and
Comparative Transactions, respectively. The three types of multiples were
calculated for four different time periods also for a basis of comparison to
measure EDG's multiples to the multiples calculated for similar time periods for
the Comparative Companies and Comparative Transactions, respectively. The
multiples were as follows: (a) Sale Value as a multiple of net sales -- 0.32x,
0.35x, 0.38x, and 0.40x, for both 1996 and 1997 pro forma for the acquisition of
Milgray Electronics, Inc. ("Milgray"), the latest twelve months ended August 31,
1998 ("LTM") and estimated 1998, respectively; (b) Sale Value as a multiple of
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA")
including deductions for the incentive costs and corporate costs estimated by
Bell's management to be appropriately allocated to EDG -- 5.6x, 7.8x, 10.8x, and
14.7x, for 1996 and 1997 pro forma for the acquisition of Milgray, the LTM and
estimated 1998, respectively; (c) Sale Value as a multiple of earnings before
interest and taxes ("EBIT") including deductions for incentive costs and
corporate costs estimated by management to be appropriately allocated to
EDG -- 5.8x, 8.4x, 11.9x, and 17.3x, for both 1996 and 1997 pro forma the
acquisition of Milgray, the LTM and estimated 1998, respectively. Estimates for
1998 were based on management's projections. EBIT and EBITDA were used because,
in Lincoln Partners' professional experience as a registered broker/dealer
specializing in merger and acquisition advice, they are commonly accepted
measures of a company's earnings power and cash flow and are used by analysts in
evaluating a company's financial performance. EBIT is used to compare the
earnings power of a business prior to management decisions regarding debt levels
or leverage for the business, which create interest expense, and the application
of income tax strategies. EBITDA is used for the same purpose but also excludes
the non-cash items, depreciation and amortization, to provide a measure of cash
earnings from the business.
Selected Comparative Public Company Analysis. Using publicly available
information, Lincoln Partners analyzed, among other things, the market values
and trading multiples of Bell and the following selected publicly traded
companies in the electronics components distribution business: Arrow
Electronics, Inc. ("Arrow"), Avnet, Inc. ("Avnet"), Bell Microproducts, Inc.,
Jaco Electronics, Inc., Kent Electronics, Marshall Industries ("Marshall"),
Nu-Horizons Electronics Corp. ("Nu-Horizons"), Pioneer-Standard Electronics,
Inc. ("Pioneer-Standard"), Reptron Electronics, Inc. ("Reptron") and Richey
Electronics, Inc. (the "Selected Companies"). Based on the above, Lincoln
Partners determined the comparable companies by following a two-step process.
First, by using SIC codes, industry information and Electronic News' list of top
industrial distributors, they identified all of the publicly traded companies
with a market capitalization over $15 million in which the industrial electrical
or electronic distribution operations represented 50% or more of sales. Second,
they eliminated certain companies such as certain "specialty" distributors,
specifically Farnell/Premier, because margin characteristics of "specialty"
distributors are significantly different. Also they eliminated certain companies
because they had certain other factors that made them not comparable to EDG.
Specifically, Bell Microproducts, Kent, Jaco, and Reptron were eliminated
because they have significant contract manufacturing operations which also
impacts margin
21
<PAGE> 26
characteristics. Richey was eliminated because it is a distributor of passive
components as compared to semiconductors. Lincoln Partners selected Arrow,
Avnet, Marshall, Nu-Horizons and Pioneer-Standard as the comparative set of
companies ("Comparative Companies"). Lincoln Partners compared market values as
a multiple of, among other things, estimated calendar 1998 and 1999 net income,
and adjusted market values (equity market value, plus debt, minority interests,
preferred stock and out-of-the-money convertible securities, less investments in
unconsolidated affiliates and cash) ("Adjusted Market Value") as multiples of,
among other things, the latest 12 months EBITDA and EBIT for the Comparative
Companies. All multiples for the Comparative Companies were based on their
closing stock prices as of September 24, 1998. Net income estimates for the
Comparative Companies were based on publicly available estimates of selected
investment banking firms. Lincoln Partners derived multiples for the Comparative
Companies as follows: (a) Adjusted Market Values to LTM net sales ranging from
0.30x to 0.48x with a mean of 0.36x and a median of 0.35x, (b) Adjusted Market
Value to LTM EBITDA ranging from 5.5x to 9.4x with a mean of 7.0x and a median
of 6.7x, (c) Adjusted Market Value to LTM EBIT ranging from 6.2x to 10.8x with a
mean of 8.1x and a median of 7.9x. The Sale Value to LTM net sales, LTM EBITDA
and LTM EBIT for the Transaction are 0.38x, 10.7x and 11.9x, respectively.
No company or business used in the Comparative Company analysis as a comparison
is identical to Bell or EDG. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the
foregoing is not entirely mathematical; rather, it involves complex
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public
trading or other values of the Comparative Companies or the business segment or
company to which they are being compared.
Comparative Sale Analysis. Lincoln Partners analyzed certain information
relating to selected merger and acquisition sales in the electronic components
distribution industry. These sales included the following: Reptron's pending
acquisition of All-American Semiconductor, Inc. ("All-American"), Marshall's
acquisition of Sterling Electronics Corp. ("Sterling"), Raab Karcher AG's ("Raab
Karcher") acquisition of Wyle Electronics ("Wyle"), Bell's acquisition of
Milgray, Farnell Electronics plc's ("Farnell") acquisition of Premier Industrial
Corp., Pioneer-Standard's acquisition of Pioneer Technologies Group, Inc.,
Arrow's acquisition of Anthem Electronics Inc.("Anthem), Arrow's acquisition of
Gates /FA Distributing, Inc. ("Gates"), Farnell's acquisition of ITT
Corporation's Multicomponents business, Hagemeyer NV's acquisition of Newey and
Eyre Group, Avnet's acquisition of Hall-Mark Electronics Corp. ("Hall-Mark"),
Arrow's acquisition of Lex Service plc's European operations and Arrow's
acquisition of Lex Service plc's North American operations. Based on the above,
Lincoln Partners determined the Comparative Transactions through a two-step
process. First, they used various M&A databases for public companies to identify
M&A transactions by SIC codes that occurred since 1991. Additionally, they
reviewed previous fairness opinions in the industry as to the comparative
transactions used. Second, from the list of transactions they eliminated certain
transactions that were not "reasonably similar" to the Bell EDG/Arrow
transaction. Specifically, Farnell's acquisition of Premier was eliminated based
on the specialty nature and large size of Premier's business. Pioneer's
acquisition of Pioneer Technologies was eliminated based on the fact that
Pioneer already owned 50% of Pioneer Technologies. Farnell's acquisition of ITT
Corporation's Multicomponents business was not used because of the specialty
nature of ITT Multicomponents. Hagemeyer's acquisition of Newey and
22
<PAGE> 27
Eyre Group was not used based on the fact that the Newey and Eyre Group
operations were based in the U.K., which has different market dynamics than in
the U.S. Arrow's acquisition of Lex Service PLC European operations was not used
because of the different dynamics of the European market place. Arrow's
acquisition of Lex Service North American operations was not used because it was
the least recent of all the transactions and took place in a different
competitive environment. Lincoln Partners selected Reptron's acquisition of
All-American, Marshall's acquisition of Sterling, Raab Karcher's acquisition of
Wyle, Bell's acquisition of Milgray, Arrow's acquisition of Anthem, Arrow's
acquisition of Gates and Avnet's acquisition of Hall-Mark as the comparative set
of transactions (the "Comparative Transactions"). Lincoln Partners' analysis
indicated that for the Comparative Transactions (a) Adjusted Market Value as a
multiple of LTM sales ranged from a low of 0.39x to a high of 0.62x with a mean
of 0.54x and a median of 0.60x; (b) Adjusted Market Value as a multiple of LTM
EBITDA ranged from a low of 8.2x to a high of 11.5x with a mean of 9.7 and a
median of 9.4x; (c) Adjusted Market Value as a multiple of LTM EBIT ranged from
a low of 8.6x to a high of 13.3x with a mean of 11.0x and a median of 11.1x. The
Sale Value to LTM net sales, LTM EBITDA and LTM EBIT for the Transaction are
0.38x, 10.7x and 11.9x, respectively.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Lincoln Partners performed discounted cash flow
analyses of the projected free cash flow of EDG over the period 1999 through
2001, based on internal estimates of the management of Bell. The stand-alone
discounted cash flow analysis was determined by (i) adding (x) the present value
at December 31, 1998 of the projected free cash flows of EDG over the three year
period from 1999 to 2001 and (y) the present value at December 31, 1998 of the
estimated terminal value of EDG in year 2002 and (ii) subtracting the current
net debt projected to be outstanding at December 31, 1998 of EDG. The range of
estimated terminal values of EDG at the end of the three-year period was
calculated by applying terminal value multiples ranging from 8.1x to 11.0x to
the projected 2002 EBIT of EDG. The range of terminal value EBIT multiples were
derived from the average LTM EBIT multiples of the Comparative Companies (8.1x)
and the Comparative Transactions (11.0x). The cash flows and terminal values
were discounted to present value using discount rates ranging from 10% to 12%.
Based on Bell management's base case and optimistic case, the net present values
produced for EDG ranged from $93.4 million to $190.0 million.
Other Factors and Comparative Analyses. In rendering its opinion, Lincoln
Partners considered certain other factors and conducted certain other
comparative analyses. Material factors considered by Lincoln Partners included
the concern of the management of Bell as to whether the EDG business would be
profitable at acceptable levels given the following trends in the industry: i)
the consolidation of other distributors into larger, more powerful competitors;
ii) the consolidation of distribution networks by suppliers resulting in the
loss of franchises for medium sized suppliers like EDG; iii) the increasing
demand by customers for global distribution capabilities; iv) the ability of the
large distributors to carry semiconductor lines from both U.S. and Asian
producers; and v) increased price competition in the market place. Lincoln
Partners also considered the concern of Bell management regarding the growth of
electronic contract manufacturers as a percent of the total distribution market
because EDG has not historically been strong in this area of the market.
Lincoln Partners reviewed the historical and projected financial results of Bell
and EDG. Material factors considered in this review include the following: i)
EDG's sales from 1994
23
<PAGE> 28
to 1996 grew at a compound annual rate of only 1.8%, including Milgray on a pro
forma basis for 1996 and 1997 (Bell's acquisition of Milgray was completed in
January 1997) sales declined from $600 million for 1996 to $540 million for
1997; ii) EDG's current run rate is $484 million; iii) EDG's forecasted base
case sales for 1999 are $450 million, with growth expected thereafter to be in
single digits; iv) EDG's operating income, including Milgray on a pro forma
basis for 1996 and 1997 operating income, prior to management incentives and
corporate costs, declined from $43.1 million to $34.3 million; v) the forecasted
operating income for 1998 on the same basis is $20.8 million; vi) the projected
operating income on the same basis on a base case scenario for 1999, 2000 and
2001 is $20.3 million, $21.8 million and $22.3 million, respectively. (These
forecasts do not include the loss of major franchises such as those experienced
in 1996, 1997 and 1998.)
Lincoln Partners also reviewed the historical and projected financial
performance and the relative market values and trading multiples of the
Comparative Companies and considered the fact that all of the Comparative
Companies experienced growth in sales from 1994 to 1996 in excess of EDG's 1.8%.
They also considered the fact that from 1996 to 1997 and for the interim periods
in 1998 over 1997 none of the Comparative Companies experienced a decline in
sales.
Lincoln Partners also reviewed the movements in the Comparative Companies'
common stock prices. For the period from September 24, 1997 to September 24,
1998 the average stock price decrease for the Comparative Companies was 49.9%,
with a high of 61.5% and a low of 42.1%.
Pursuant to the terms of Lincoln Partners' engagement, Bell has agreed to pay
Lincoln Partners a fee of $175,000 for rendering it's opinion as to fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid to Bell in the
Sale. Bell also has agreed to reimburse Lincoln Partners for reasonable travel
and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Lincoln Partners in performing its
services, including the reasonable fees and expenses of its legal counsel, and
to indemnify Lincoln Partners and related persons against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of Lincoln
Partners' engagement.
From time to time principals and/or employees of Lincoln Partners may hold
positions in the securities of Bell or Arrow. Lincoln Partners has provided
investment banking services to Bell unrelated to the proposed Sale, for which
services Lincoln Partners has received compensation.
Lincoln Partners is a registered broker/dealer specializing in providing merger
and acquisition advice and was selected by Bell based on its experience,
expertise and familiarity with the electronic components distribution industry,
in general, and with Bell's EDG, in particular. Lincoln Partners regularly
engages in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS
In considering the recommendations of the Board, shareholders should be aware
that certain members of the Board and the management of the Company have certain
interests in the Sale that are different from, or in addition to, the interests
of shareholders generally.
24
<PAGE> 29
Severance Agreements. The Company has severance agreements with its executive
officers, including Messrs. Graham, Edwards, Hough and Weeks. Each of these
agreements provides, in essence, that, should there be a "change in control"
(which would include the Sale) and the officer's employment is terminated either
(i) involuntarily, without just cause, or (ii) voluntarily, if the officer has
determined in good faith that his duties have been altered in a material respect
or there has been a reduction in his compensation or employee benefits, the
officer would be entitled to receive a severance payment. With respect to
Messrs. Graham and Edwards such payment would be in the amount of 295% of such
officer's "base amount" (generally equivalent to the highest twelve consecutive
months of compensation during the three year period prior to a change in
control) as determined in accordance with Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code. Mr. Graham has agreed that his payment would not exceed that allowed under
the Internal Revenue Code without the imposition of the 20% excise tax penalty.
Messrs. Hough and Weeks are entitled to severance payments in a fixed amount.
Mr. Edwards is expected to continue his employment with the Company following
the Sale. Accordingly, no severance payments are expected to be paid to him.
If any of the triggering events described immediately above occurs following the
Sale, such executive officers would receive severance payments of approximately
$950,000, $1,033,000, $642,000, and $141,000, respectively, for an aggregate
amount of $2,766,000 (or $1,733,000 excluding Mr. Edwards).
Excise Taxes. To the extent the severance payments and accelerated vesting
amounts under the EDP and stock option plans are subject to excise taxes, such
payments will be "grossed-up" or augmented to pay any excise tax due. If the
Sale is consummated, and if Mr. Edwards should receive severance in connection
with the change in control, he will be entitled to approximately $570,000 in
"gross-up" payments for excise tax liabilities. Due to the amount of the
severance payment, the Company believes that the severance payable to the other
three executive officers would not be subject to the excise tax.
Executive Deferred Income and Pension Plan. In July 1993, the Company adopted an
Executive Deferred Income and Pension Plan (the "EDP"). Under the EDP, a
participant may elect to defer a portion (not more than 10%) of his salary,
which deferred portion is to be matched by the Company and vests over 12 years
based on years of service. If a participant is terminated without cause or after
a change in control, he will receive a lump sum payment equal to all amounts
that have accrued for his benefit up to the date of his termination. If the Sale
is consummated, and if the participating executives are terminated in connection
with the change in control, Messrs. Graham, Edwards, Hough and Weeks will
receive all deferred amounts under the EDP, including acceleration of the
previously non-vested Company matched portions totaling $0, $115,000, $0, and
$46,000, for a total of $161,000. Mr. Edwards is expected to remain employed by
the Company for an indefinite period of time.
Non-Employee Directors' Retirement Plan. Pursuant to a non-employee directors'
retirement plan, which was terminated in January 1996 (except to the extent of
vested rights), Messrs. Cost and Rosenberg are entitled to an annual retirement
benefit of $40,000 per year for the number of years each served as a director.
Further, in the event of a change of control of the Company (which would include
the Sale) accompanied by a cessation of their services as a director, each could
elect to receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of his retirement
benefit. Accordingly, if they so elect and cease to serve as
25
<PAGE> 30
directors, they would be entitled to receive $380,000 and $316,000 upon
consummation of the Sale.
Vesting of Stock Options. As of November 30, 1998, the following Directors and
Officers held options to purchase the Company's Common Stock, subject to future
vesting:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES
NAME UPON EXERCISE EXERCISE PRICE
---- ---------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
John J. Cost.................................... 13,800 $14.38
Secretary and Director 1,000 $13.69
Of Counsel
Irell & Manella LLP, Attorneys
Anthony L. Craig................................ 13,800 $14.38
Director 1,000 $13.69
President, Global Knowledge Network
Tracy A. Edwards................................ 34,729 $13.58
Executive Vice President -- Finance and
Operations, 9,840(1) $14.38
and Chief Financial Officer 50,000 $13.75
Gordon Graham................................... 65,040(2) $14.38
President and Chief Executive Officer and
Director
D.J. Hough...................................... 41,675 $13.58
Senior Vice President and 6,000(3) $14.38
Chief Information Officer
Peter A. Resnick................................ 3,600(3) $14.38
Vice President and Corporate Controller
Milton Rosenberg................................ 13,800 $14.38
Director 1,000 $13.69
Private investor and consultant
Charles S. Troy................................. 13,800 $14.38
Vice President
Steven A. Weeks................................. 2,400(4) $14.38
Vice President and Treasurer 3,000 $16.56
Theodore Williams............................... 90,000(3) $14.38
Chairman of the Board
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Includes 5,040 shares subject to a minimum share price $18.69 to exercise.
(2) Includes 60,000 shares and 5,040 shares subject to minimum share prices of
$20.00 and $18.69, respectively, to exercise.
(3) Represents shares that are subject to a minimum share price of $20.00 to
exercise.
(4) Represents shares that are subject to a minimum share price of $15.94 to
exercise.
Under the Company's Stock Option Plan, the Sale constitutes a change of control.
Upon a change of control of the Company, the vesting of these stock options will
accelerate and they will become immediately exercisable. As of December 22,
1998, the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $10.75 per share.
Based on the closing price of $10.75 per share of the Common Stock, on December
22, 1998 these stock options are "out of the money."
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT; FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The Sale of EDG is expected to result in a significant accounting loss of
approximately $60 million to $65 million. However, due primarily to the
existence of nondeductible goodwill, Bell expects to realize a gain for federal
and state tax purposes. Because the Sale is solely a corporate action, it has no
tax impact on shareholders.
26
<PAGE> 31
DESCRIPTION OF BELL
GENERAL
Bell Industries, Inc. is primarily a national distributor of electronic
components. In addition, Bell's operations include computer systems integration;
distribution of after-market products for recreational vehicles, motorcycles,
snowmobiles and powerboats; and two electronics manufacturers. As discussed
under "Remaining Businesses" on page 29, these other businesses will continue to
be operated by Bell after the Sale. Bell recently completed the sale of
Graphics. See "Recent Developments."
ELECTRONICS DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
Shareholders are being asked to approve the sale of Bell's Electronics
Distribution Group ("EDG"), a component of Bell's Electronics Group segment, to
Arrow. For fiscal 1997 and the nine months ended September 30, 1998, EDG
accounted for 74% and 69% of sales and 66% and 52% of consolidated operating
income. (These percentages are after giving effect to the sale of Graphics in
September 1998.) EDG sells electronic components to approximately 10,000
customers in North America, including: semiconductors (Dallas Semiconductor, IBM
Microelectronics, Maxim, Microchip, NEC, Samsung, Sharp, ST Microelectronics);
passive components (Aromat, AVX, Bourns, Murata, Vishay); connectors (Berg); and
board-level products. EDG also provides value-added services including: kitting;
turnkey; SMART (automated replenishment system); assembly of custom cables;
harnesses and connectors; contract purchasing; and direct programming of chips.
EDG is based in El Segundo, California and markets electronic components from
more than 30 sales facilities located throughout the United States and Canada to
a broad base of customers and markets.
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
EDG markets electronic components supplied by over 100 manufacturers and stocks
over 50,000 items at a primary distribution center located in Southern
California. For the year ended December 31, 1997, EDG's largest electronic
component suppliers, which in the aggregate accounted for approximately 42% of
its sales, were ST Microelectronics, Analog Devices, NEC, Maxim, Aromat,
Samsung, Vishay, Bourns, Microchip, Sharp, Dallas Semiconductor, and AVX. For
the nine months ended September 30, 1998, these same suppliers accounted for
approximately 50% of sales. In April 1998, Analog Devices announced that it was
terminating its franchise with Bell in connection with a significant realignment
and contraction of its distribution network.
EDG provides value-added services, include kitting; turnkey; SMART (automated
replenishment system); assembly of custom cables; harnesses and connectors;
contract purchasing; and direct programming of chips. These services are
designed to enhance the competitiveness of EDG's customers by providing cost
efficiencies through outsourcing along with the ability to introduce products
into the marketplace more quickly and efficiently.
27
<PAGE> 32
RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS
EDG has distribution agreements with its component suppliers, which may be
terminated by either party generally by 30 days notice. The loss of a major
supplier could significantly impact operating results and as noted in this Proxy
Statement, recent trends have increased the risk of additional franchise losses,
as suppliers consolidate distribution channels.
EDG's distribution agreements with suppliers generally provide, among other
things, that EDG can return inventory declared obsolete by the manufacturer or
inventory in excess of current requirements, up to a specified percentage of the
dollar amount purchased from the manufacturer and subject to certain
restrictions. Most manufacturers protect the Company against subsequent
manufacturer price reductions by issuing credits to EDG with respect to the
affected product in EDG's inventory. As part of its value-added services, EDG
purchases certain products from suppliers that have not entered into
distribution agreements with the Company. Consequently, the Company may not
receive the same level of inventory protection as that available under its
distribution agreements, particularly the ability to return obsolete or excess
inventory.
COMPETITION
EDG is subject to intense competition from international, national, regional and
local independent distributors along with direct sales by manufacturers. The
principal factors of competition are quality of service, price, variety and
availability of products carried and value-added services capability. See
"Reasons for the Sale."
BACKLOG
Most orders received by EDG are for short-term delivery. Consequently, the
dollar amount of unfilled orders is subject to rapid change and represents
customer orders for products for which EDG is awaiting delivery from the
manufacturer, or customer orders for products with delivery dates scheduled as
much as twelve months in advance. However, since these orders are for products
normally stocked, cancellation of an order would not have a significant effect
on the operations of EDG.
MILGRAY ACQUISITION
In January 1997, the Company completed the acquisition of Milgray Electronics,
Inc. ("MILGRAY"), a publicly-traded distributor of electronic components whose
business was substantially the same as EDG's. The purchase price for the stock
of Milgray was approximately $100 million. Fiscal 1996 sales for Milgray were
$272 million. Since acquiring Milgray, the Company has integrated the Milgray
business into EDG. This has been accomplished through consolidation of sales
offices, unification of business processes, centralization of administrative
functions, and combinations of distribution centers.
PROPERTIES
At September 30, 1998, in connection with EDG, the Company leased 42 facilities
containing approximately 216,000 square feet, and owned two properties
containing approximately 341,000 square feet. In connection with the Sale, Arrow
will assume the benefits and obligations of the leased properties. In addition,
Arrow will acquire one owned property containing approximately 265,000 square
feet, and at its option, may lease the remaining owned property.
28
<PAGE> 33
EMPLOYEES
EDG employed approximately 775 persons as of October 31, 1998.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Bell recently completed the sale of Graphics to PrimeSource Corporation. The net
proceeds (approximately $40 million) from the sale will be used to reduce debt
under Bell's Credit Facility. Graphics distributed graphics and electronic
imaging supplies and equipment throughout the upper Midwest and Western United
States to the advertising and printing industries. Major product lines
distributed by the group included film, plates, chemicals and other printing
supplies from Agfa, DuPont, Eastman Kodak, Imation, Konica, and Western Litho as
well as prepress and related electronic imaging equipment from Agfa, Apple,
Howtek, Intergraph, and Screen. For the year ended December 31, 1997 and the six
months ended June 30, 1998, Graphics reported sales of $156.3 million and $71.5
million and operating income of $4.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
REMAINING BUSINESSES
The following sets forth a description of the four businesses of the Company
that will continue to be owned and operated by the Company after the Sale is
consummated. These businesses include the Computer Division, the Recreational
Products Group and two electronics manufacturing divisions. Collectively, these
businesses are referred to as the "REMAINING BUSINESSES." (Historically, the
Computer Division, the two electronic manufacturing divisions and EDG comprised
Bell's Electronics Group segment.) For fiscal 1997, the Remaining Businesses
together accounted for 26% of consolidated sales and 34% of consolidated
operating income. In the nine month period ended September 30, 1998, they
accounted for 31% of consolidated sales and 48% of consolidated operating
income. (These percentages are after giving effect to the sale of Graphics in
September 1998).
COMPUTER DIVISION
The Computer Division ("CD") is a full service value-added computer integrator
in the Midwestern and Eastern United States. CD is headquartered in
Indianapolis, Indiana and as of October 31, 1998, had approximately 390
employees throughout its operating regions.
CD sells services and products designed to manage personal computer network
infrastructures for large and small organizations. It provides solutions for its
customers' needs by combining a comprehensive offering of value-added services
with its expertise in sourcing and distributing microcomputers, network
products, computer peripherals and software.
CD's suppliers include: Compaq, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Sun Microsystems and Apple
for personal computers; Microsoft, Lotus, Novell and Oracle for software; and
Cisco, Bay Networks, Tangram, and Seagate for network-related products. It has a
customer base of over 9,000 organizations ranging in size from two-person
partnerships to large corporations. CD also has a relationship with Apple
Computer to supply products and related services to the "K12" educational market
in the regions served by CD.
Although there are no dominant competitors in CD's market due to fragmentation
of the industry, CD faces significant competition from companies such as
Vanstar, Pomeroy
29
<PAGE> 34
Computer Resources, Compucom Systems and Alpha Net Solutions, some of whom have
greater financial and marketing resources than CD.
CD supports customers primarily in the states of Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio,
Virginia, Wisconsin, North Carolina and South Carolina. Within these areas, CD
serves the commercial and/or the educational markets with its products and
services. CD has over 5,000 active customers, with two customers (both Fortune
500 companies) accounting for approximately 20% of 1997 revenues.
For 1997, CD had sales and operating income of $124.7 million and $5.9 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, CD had sales and operating income
of $110.3 million and $5.2 million. Revenues and operating income for CD have
increased in 1998 as a result of increased sales of microcomputer and network
systems, and increased service revenue associated with the deployment of these
systems products. The Company believes the increased revenues relate to a
general trend by corporations and educational institutions to outsource
information technology upgrade support, particularly in microcomputer systems
management, which previously had been managed in-house.
RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS GROUP
The Recreational Products Group ("RPG") is a distributor of replacement parts
and accessories for recreational and other leisure-time vehicles. RPG supplies
these products in the upper Midwestern United States to service departments of
dealers and retail stores selling recreational vehicles, mobile homes,
snowmobiles, motorcycles and powerboats. RPG also sells to independent repair
facilities. RPG is the only major distributor to supply such a full range of
leisure-time vehicle aftermarket products. RPG operates distribution and
administration facilities in Germantown, Wisconsin; South St. Paul, Minnesota;
and Grand Rapids, Michigan, and maintains a sales office in Brainerd, Minnesota.
At October 31, 1998, RPG had approximately 175 employees.
The group supplies more than 9,000 recreational vehicle-related products, as
well as over 9,500 marine items, 10,000 motorcycle items, and 7,000 snowmobile
items. Major product lines distributed by the group include Bieffe Helmets,
Dunlop, Nordyne, NGK, and Whirlpool. RPG has over 4,800 current customers, none
of which accounts for over 5% of its annual sales.
RPG has significant market share in distribution of recreational vehicle
replacement parts and accessories in the upper Midwestern United States.
Management believes RPG is the only distributor in this region to serve the full
range of recreational vehicle markets.
RPG faces significant competition from national and regional distributors of
after-market products for recreational vehicles, motorcycles, snowmobiles, and
powerboats.
For the year ended December 31, 1997, RPG had sales and operating income of
$46.2 million and $2.9 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998,
RPG had sales of $37.9 million and operating income of $2.7 million. Growth for
1998 is primarily attributed to the Company's expansion to Michigan partially
offset by the negative effect of warmer weather conditions on winter product
shipments during the third quarter of 1998. The Company is not aware of any
significant overall trends affecting the business.
30
<PAGE> 35
ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING DIVISIONS
Bell's electronics manufacturing divisions are J.W. Miller and Precision
Metalcraft. In 1997, these operations recorded sales of approximately $23.7
million and operating income of approximately $4.2 million. For the nine months
ended September 30, 1998, sales were approximately $12.6 million and operating
income was approximately $1.6 million. The decrease in revenues and operating
income for the Electronics Manufacturing Divisions has been attributed primarily
to general industry weakness in the procurement of electronic components and to
the transition out of certain precision-stamped components nearing the end of
product cycles. The Company believes these trends will continue until industry
conditions improve and newer products are introduced.
J.W. Miller Division
The J.W. Miller Division ("JWM") of Bell, located in Gardena, California,
manufactures and distributes over 5,000 different radio frequency ("RF")
magnetic products in a full line of materials. JWM's RF magnetic products
include inductors, coils and chokes, among others. These products are used
extensively in all types of circuitry found in electronic applications including
computer, medical and telecommunications equipment. Inductors, JWM's primary
product, are used to filter electronic noise from electronic circuits or
subsystems. At October 31, 1998, JWM had approximately 25 employees.
JWM's products are sold to various original equipment manufacturers directly and
through electronics distributors. JWM utilizes a network of approximately 20
sales representatives to promote its products in the industrial market place.
JWM has a large and diverse customer base, with its ten largest customers
representing 36% of its total sales. Approximately 25% of JWM sales are to EDG
for resale to the end-user. The Company cannot predict whether the sale of EDG
to Arrow will have a material effect on JWM's sales to EDG in the long term,
either positively or adversely. However, the Company believes that the proposed
sale of EDG to Arrow will not have an effect on JWM's sales to EDG during 1999.
No other customer represents more than 6% of its total sales. Substantially all
of JWM's sales are derived from customers located in the United States.
JWM has its manufacturing facility in Gardena, California, where approximately
15% of its products are produced. The remaining products are produced by
contract manufacturers in Mexico and Taiwan.
Although JWM's focus on specialty inductor configurations gives it certain
competitive advantages in its market, some of JWM's competitors have greater
financial and marketing resources than JWM. JWM expects to continue to face
significant competition from several companies, including Dale (a division of
Vishay), Gowanda Electronics Corp., Toko, Inc. and TDK Corp.
For 1997, JWM had sales of $8.9 million (including $2 million of sales to EDG).
For the nine month period ended September 30, 1998, JWM had sales of $5.9
million (including $1.2 million of sales to EDG).
Precision Metalcraft Division
Bell's Precision Metalcraft Division ("PMD"), located in Mountain View,
California, is a manufacturer of high quality, short run precision metal stamped
parts. Its products are sold to original equipment manufacturers in a variety of
industries including electronic
31
<PAGE> 36
components, computers and related peripheral equipment. At October 31, 1998, PMD
had approximately 50 employees.
PMD's products are manufactured to customer specifications using a variety of
metals including stainless and carbon steel, beryllium, nickel, copper and
mylar. Stamping thin material is a specialty of PMD. PMD works with materials as
thin as .0012 inches. PMD designs, builds and maintains all tooling in its fully
equipped tool shop.
For 1997, PMD had sales of $14.8 million. For the nine month period ended
September 30, 1998, PMD sales were $6.7 million.
In 1997, Hewlett-Packard and a related contract manufacturer represented
approximately 70% of PMD's total sales. For the nine months ended September 30,
1998 Hewlett-Packard and the contract manufacturer accounted for approximately
81% of total sales.
PMD's equipment is state of the art and includes precision tooling machinery,
punch presses, and computer controlled fabrication and measuring equipment. The
division is currently preparing to become ISO 9002 certified and expects to
obtain certification in approximately one year.
PMD does not face significant competition in serving customers who require short
run, close tolerance metal stamped products. However, because PMD's
manufacturing operations are not geared for long run production, PMD faces
significant competition in the larger volume market and may lose the business to
a competitor with greater capacity.
PROPERTIES
At September 30, 1998, the Company leased 62 facilities containing approximately
554,000 square feet and owned eight facilities containing approximately 562,000
square feet including properties utilized by EDG. The facilities utilized by
each of the Company's Remaining Businesses and Corporate Office are set forth in
the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AREA IN SQUARE FEET
(NUMBER OF LOCATIONS)
---------------------------------
OWNED LEASED
-------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Computer systems integration................ 108,000 (10)
Recreational products....................... 67,000 (1) 146,000 (3)
Electronics manufacturing................... 40,000 (2) 18,000 (3)
Corporate................................... 52,000 (1) 31,000 (2)
Discontinued operations..................... 62,000 (2) 35,000 (2)
------- --- ------- ----
221,000 (6) 338,000 (20)
======= === ======= ====
</TABLE>
For the most part, the Company's facilities are fully utilized, although excess
capacity exists from time to time, based on product mix and demand. Management
believes that these properties are in good condition and suitable for their
present use.
The Company has subleased all facilities related to discontinued operations.
32
<PAGE> 37
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As described in this Proxy Statement, Bell intends to make a distribution to
shareholders in an amount of $50 million to $60 million. The following pro forma
financial statements give effect to the Sale and distribution in an assumed
amount of $55 million to shareholders. Therefore, such statements present pro
forma financial information regarding the Remaining Businesses without EDG, and
after the assumed distribution to shareholders. The pro forma balance sheet
assumes that the Sale and the distribution to shareholders occurred on September
30, 1998, while the pro forma statements of operations assume that the Sale and
the distribution to shareholders occurred on January 1, 1995.
The pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
historical consolidated financial statements of Bell appearing elsewhere in this
Proxy Statement. The Company expects its corporate costs will be substantially
lower following the Sale of EDG, and it will endeavor to restructure its
operations to realize these savings. These pro forma financial statements do not
reflect such cost savings, nor those expected to be achieved following the
recent sale of Graphics. Accordingly, these pro forma operating results are not
indicative of operating results which would have been achieved had the Sale been
consummated as of the dates presented and should not be construed as
representative of future operations.
Bell without EDG, and after giving effect to the sale of Graphics completed on
September 14, 1998, will be significantly smaller and will concentrate on its
remaining businesses consisting of computer systems integration, recreational
products distribution and electronics manufacturing. These remaining businesses
historically have been profitable.
From the proceeds, the Company will pay various transaction related costs,
including estimated legal, advisory, and banking costs of $5 million, estimated
employee separation and related exit costs of $12 million, and estimated taxes
of $9 million. The Company intends to use a substantial portion of the proceeds
to pay off its indebtedness under its Credit Facility, which is estimated to
range between $100 million to $110 million at the time the Sale closes.
Accordingly, after the transaction cost and debt payments, the Company intends
to use the proceeds to make a distribution to shareholders.
The Company has received preliminary approval from its primary lender for a line
of credit in the amount of $20 million to finance short-term cash flow and
working capital requirements, and longer term needs in expanding the business.
Management believes that it has access to additional financing as required.
33
<PAGE> 38
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRONICS
DISTRIBUTION PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL GROUP(a) ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA
---------- ------------ ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents...... $ 4,957 $ 50,372(b) $ 329
(55,000)(c)
Accounts receivable, net....... 89,033 $ (60,328) 28,705
Net receivable from sale of
Graphics.................... 12,257 12,257
Inventories.................... 131,064 (114,936) 16,128
Prepaid expenses and other..... 11,052 (559) 10,493
-------- --------- -------
Total current assets... 248,363 (175,823) 67,912
-------- --------- -------
Properties, net.................. 35,215 (17,582) 17,633
Goodwill......................... 67,540 (65,780) 1,760
Other assets..................... 9,411 (50) 9,361
-------- --------- -------
$360,529 $(259,235) $96,666
======== ========= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable............... $ 51,799 $ (26,787) $25,012
Accrued liabilities and
payroll..................... 27,315 (4,582) 22,733
Current portion of long-term
liabilities................. 9,375 (9,375)(b)
Income taxes payable........... 9,000(b) 9,000
-------- --------- -------
Total current
liabilities......... 88,489 (31,369) 56,745
-------- --------- -------
Long-term debt................... 114,710 (6,457) (108,253)(b)
Deferred compensation and
other.......................... 7,105 7,105
Investment in EDG................ (221,409) 221,409(b)
Shareholders' equity............. 150,225 (62,409)(b) 32,816
(55,000)(c)
Commitments and contingencies
-------- --------- -------
$360,529 $(259,235) $96,666
======== ========= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
34
<PAGE> 39
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRONICS
DISTRIBUTION PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL GROUP(a) ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA(f)
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales..................... $521,172 $(360,337) $160,835
-------- --------- --------
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold....... 414,982 (286,961) 128,021
Selling and
administrative........... 83,745 (55,580) 28,165
Depreciation and
amortization............. 6,995 (3,477) 3,518
Interest.................... 9,667 $(9,667)(d)
Business system and
corporate resizing
charges.................. 13,800 (3,900) 9,900
-------- --------- --------
529,189 349,918 169,604
-------- --------- --------
Loss from continuing
operations before income
taxes....................... (8,017) (10,419) (8,769)
Income tax benefit............ (1,732) (4,873) 2,922 (3,683)
-------- --------- --------
Loss from continuing
operations.................. $ (6,285) $ (5,546) $ (5,086)
======== ========= ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA:
Loss from continuing
operations
Basic.................. $ (0.67) $ (0.54)
======== ========
Diluted................ $ (0.67) $ (0.54)
======== ========
Weighted average shares
outstanding
Basic.................. 9,385 9,385
======== ========
Diluted................ 9,385 9,385
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
35
<PAGE> 40
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRONICS
DISTRIBUTION PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL GROUP(a) ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA(f)
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales........................ $559,523 $(409,324) $150,199
-------- --------- --------
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold.......... 434,502 (317,844) 116,658
Selling and administration..... 93,255 (65,186) 28,069
Depreciation and
amortization................ 6,937 (3,265) 3,672
Interest....................... 8,810 $(8,810)(d)
Integration charge............. 4,100 (4,100)
-------- --------- --------
547,604 (390,395) 148,399
-------- --------- --------
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes............ 11,919 (18,929) 1,800
Income tax provision............. 5,715 (9,076) 4,117(e) 756
-------- --------- --------
Income from continuing
operations..................... $ 6,204 $ (9,853) $ 1,044
======== ========= ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA:
Income from continuing
operations
Basic..................... $ 0.68 $ 0.11
======== ========
Diluted................... $ 0.66 $ 0.11
======== ========
Weighted average shares
outstanding
Basic..................... 9,118 9,118
======== ========
Diluted................... 9.401 9,401
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
36
<PAGE> 41
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRONICS
DISTRIBUTION PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL GROUP(a) ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA(f)
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $734,449 $(539,808) $194,641
-------- --------- --------
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold....... 571,344 (420,589) 150,755
Selling and
administrative........... 123,158 (85,605) 37,553
Depreciation and
amortization............. 9,196 (4,370) 4,826
Interest.................... 12,309 $ (12,309)(d)
Integration charge.......... 4,100 (4,100)
-------- --------- --------
720,107 (514,664) 193,134
-------- --------- --------
Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes....................... 14,342 (25,144) 1,507
Income tax provision.......... 6,823 (11,962) 5,772(e) 633
-------- --------- --------
Income from continuing
operations.................. $ 7,519 $ (13,182) $ 874
======== ========= ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA:
Income from continuing
operations
Basic.................. $ .82 $ 0.10
======== ========
Diluted................ $ .80 $ 0.09
======== ========
Weighted average shares
outstanding
Basic.................. 9,157 9,157
======== ========
Diluted................ 9,430 9,430
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
37
<PAGE> 42
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRONICS
DISTRIBUTION
HISTORICAL GROUP(a) PRO FORMA(f)
---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.................................. $506,062 $(327,354) $176,708
-------- --------- --------
Cost and expenses
Costs of products sold................... 387,876 (250,978) 136,898
Selling and administration............... 84,924 (51,256) 33,668
Depreciation and amortization............ 5,736 (1,380) 4,356
Interest................................. 3,673 3,673
-------- --------- --------
482,209 (303,614) 178,595
-------- --------- --------
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes...................... 23,853 (23,740) 113
Income tax provision....................... 9,992 (9,945) 47
-------- --------- --------
Income from continuing operations.......... $ 13,861 $ (13,795) $ 66
======== ========= ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA:
Income from continuing
operations
Basic............................... $ 1.57 $ 0.01
======== ========
Diluted............................. $ 1.52 $ 0.01
======== ========
Weighted average shares
outstanding
Basic............................... 8,852 8,852
======== ========
Diluted............................. 9,109 9,109
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
38
<PAGE> 43
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRONICS
DISTRIBUTION
HISTORICAL GROUP(a) PRO FORMA(f)
---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.................................. $490,966 $(346,087) $144,879
-------- --------- --------
Cost and expenses
Costs of products sold................... 375,168 (267,573) 107,595
Selling and administration............... 82,863 (52,048) 30,815
Depreciation and amortization............ 5,755 (1,242) 4,513
Interest................................. 3,612 3,612
Lease commitment provision............... 2,800 2,800
Gain on sale of division................. (3,050) (3,050)
-------- --------- --------
467,148 (320,863) 146,285
-------- --------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes...................... 23,818 (25,224) (1,406)
Income tax provision (benefit)............. 10,008 (10,599) (591)
-------- --------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing operations... $ 13,810 $ (14,625) $ (815)
======== ========= ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA:
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
Basic............................... $ 1.56 $ (0.09)
======== ========
Diluted............................. $ 1.52 $ (0.09)
======== ========
Weighted average shares
outstanding
Basic............................... 8,852 8,852
======== ========
Diluted............................. 9,109 9,109
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
39
<PAGE> 44
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(a) Represents the elimination of the historical accounts of EDG for each of the
periods presented.
(b) Represents estimated proceeds of $185 million from the Sale of EDG, the use
of proceeds to extinguish all outstanding borrowings and the payment of
approximately $17 million of estimated selling costs including severance
payments. Additionally, reflects the elimination of the investment in EDG
and records a loss of approximately $62.4 million on the Sale of EDG
including estimated selling costs and taxes. The final purchase price is
subject to post closing adjustments. The loss has not been included in the
pro forma statements of income for the periods presented.
The following is a summary of the net pro forma cash entry at September 30,
1998:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Estimated gross proceeds.................................... $ 185,000
Estimated selling costs..................................... (17,000)
---------
Estimated net proceeds.................................... 168,000
Repayment of outstanding borrowings......................... (117,628)
---------
Net cash.................................................. $ 50,372
=========
</TABLE>
(c) Represents the distribution of $55 million of cash to shareholders. The pro
forma presentation does not reflect the planned second cash distribution
that is subject to the timing and completion of the disposition of certain
real estate assets. The amount of the second distribution is estimated to
be $10 million to $15 million and is expected to be paid in late 1999.
(d) Represents the elimination of consolidated interest expense for the period
assuming the net estimated cash proceeds are utilized to reduce long-term
debt as required by Bell's borrowing agreement.
(e) Adjusts income tax expense for the effect of the pro forma adjustments
based on the effective tax rate for the period presented.
40
<PAGE> 45
(f) Unaudited pro forma financial data for each of the Remaining Businesses is
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
------------------- ------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales
Computer systems
integration.............. $110,289 $ 94,558 $124,680 $112,953 $ 73,742
Recreational products....... 37,897 36,389 46,234 43,704 42,576
Electronics manufacturing... 12,649 19,252 23,727 22,051 28,561
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$160,835 $150,199 $194,641 $178,708 $144,879
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Operating income
Computer systems
integration.............. $ 5,227 $ 4,516 $ 5,933 $ 5,692 $ 2,897
Recreational products....... 2,717 2,452 2,880 3,380 3,536
Electronics manufacturing... 1,597 3,412 4,230 3,613 7,329
Corporate costs............. (8,410) (8,580) (11,536) (8,899) (8,756)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1,131 1,800 1,507 3,786 5,006
Interest.................... (3,673) (3,612)
Business system and
corporate resizing
charges.................. (9,900)
Lease commitment
provision................ (2,800)
Income tax (provision)
benefit..................... 3,683 (756) (633) (47) 591
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing
operations.................. $ (5,086) $ 1,044 $ 874 $ 66 $ (815)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The pro forma selling and administrative expenses include the historical
corporate costs for the entire Company, including those costs required to
support EDG and Graphics. The Company expects corporate costs will be
substantially lower following the Sale of EDG, and will restructure its
operations to realize these savings. These anticipated savings are not
reflected in the pro forma presentation. Management expects these annual
savings to be approximately $8 million to $9 million, before tax effects,
after a restructuring of the Company's operations following the sale of
EDG to bring corporate costs in-line with the Company's smaller size.
41
<PAGE> 46
DESCRIPTION OF ARROW
Arrow Electronics, Inc. is the world's largest distributor of electronic
components and computer products to industrial and commercial customers. Arrow's
global distribution network spans the world's three dominant electronics
markets -- North America, Europe, and the Asia/Pacific region. Arrow is the
largest electronics distributor in each of these vital industrialized regions,
serving a diversified base of original equipment manufacturers and commercial
customers worldwide. Original equipment manufacturers include manufacturers of
computer and office products, industrial equipment (including machine tools,
factory automation, and robotic equipment), telecommunications products,
aircraft and aerospace equipment, and scientific and medical devices. Commercial
customers are mainly value-added resellers of computer systems. Arrow maintains
over 200 sales facilities and 26 distribution centers in 32 countries.
Arrow's sales and operating income for fiscal 1997 were $7.8 billion and $434
million, before special charges. For the nine month period ended September 30,
1998, Arrow had sales and operating income of $6 billion and $266 million.
Arrow's total assets at September 30, 1998 were $3.8 billion.
Arrow is a publicly-owned New York corporation whose common stock is traded on
The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ARW."
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Bell and Arrow are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "EXCHANGE ACT"), and in accordance
therewith file reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "COMMISSION"). The Commission file
number for Bell is 1-11471 and for Arrow is 1-4482. Such reports and other
information may be inspected and copied at the Commission's Public Reference
Section, Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, where copies
can be obtained at prescribed rates, as well as at the Commission's regional
offices at Northwest Atrium Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400,
Chicago, Illinois 60661 and 7 World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York
10048. The Commission also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and
other information filed electronically with the Commission, the address of which
is http://www.sec.gov. In addition, this material may also be inspected at the
offices of The New York Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York
10005, where copies may be obtained at prescribed rates.
42
<PAGE> 47
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
References in this discussion to "Electronics" and the "Electronics Group"
include Bell's Electronics Distribution Group (i.e., EDG), together with two out
of the three Remaining Businesses: computer systems integration and electronics
manufacturing. See "Remaining Businesses." References to "Graphics Imaging" and
the "Graphics Imaging Group" refer to Graphics, Bell's recently sold graphics
imaging business. See "Recent Developments."
GENERAL
This analysis contains forward looking comments which are based on current
trends. Actual results may differ materially. The following discussion should be
read in conjunction with the business description and consolidated financial
statements appearing elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
In January 1997, Bell completed the acquisition of Milgray Electronics, Inc., a
publicly traded distributor of electronic components. The results of the Company
for 1997 include the results of the acquired business of Milgray. Pro forma
operating results for 1996, assuming Milgray was acquired on January 1, 1996 and
restated to reflect the recent sale of Graphics, were as follows: Net
sales -- $778 million; Operating income -- $47.9 million; Income from continuing
operations before extraordinary loss -- $15.1 million; and Net income -- $16.4
million.
Income from discontinued operations relates to the recently completed sale of
Graphics. See "Recent Developments."
43
<PAGE> 48
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations by business segment were as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
-------------------- --------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales
Electronics.......... $483,275 $523,134 $688,215 $462,358 $448,390
Recreational
Products.......... 37,897 36,389 46,234 43,704 42,576
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$521,172 $559,523 $734,449 $506,062 $490,966
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Operating income
Electronics(1)(2).... $ 17,243 $ 26,857 $ 35,307 $ 33,045 $ 35,450
Recreational
Products.......... 2,717 2,452 2,880 3,380 3,536
Corporate costs...... (8,410) (8,580) (11,536) (8,899) (8,756)
Business system and
corporate resizing
charges........... (9,900)
Lease commitment
provision......... (2,800)
Interest expense..... (9,667) (8,810) (12,309) (3,673) (3,612)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before income
taxes................ (8,017) 11,919 14,342 23,853 23,818
Income tax provision
(benefit)............ (1,732) 5,715 6,823 9,992 10,008
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before extraordinary
loss................. (6,285) 6,204 7,519 13,861 13,810
Income from
discontinued
operations........... 1,897 1,902 2,562 2,066 1,161
Gain on sale of
discontinued
operations........... 1,748
Extraordinary loss..... (675) (675)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)...... $ (2,640) $ 7,431 $ 9,406 $ 15,927 $ 14,971
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 49
A summary of comparative operating results data as a percentage of net sales
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS
ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------- -----------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales............................ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of products sold.............. (79.6) (77.7) (77.8) (76.7) (76.4)
Selling and administrative
expense......................... (16.1) (16.7) (16.8) (16.8) (16.9)
Depreciation and amortization...... (1.3) (1.2) (1.2) (1.1) (1.2)
Interest expense................... (1.9) (1.6) (1.7) (0.7) (0.7)
Business system and corporate
resizing charges................ (2.6)
Integration charge................. (.7) (0.6)
Lease commitment provision......... (0.6)
Gain on sale of division........... 0.6
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
and extraordinary loss.......... (1.5) 2.1 1.9 4.7 4.8
Income tax provision (benefit)....... (0.3) 1.0 0.9 2.0 2.0
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before extraordinary
loss............................... (1.2)% 1.1% 1.0% 2.7% 2.8%
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Includes before-tax special charge of $4.1 million for costs associated with
the integration of Bell and Milgray in the first quarter of 1997, and gain
on sale of division of $3.1 million in 1995.
(2) Includes before-tax special charge of $3.9 million for employee separation
and related exit costs in the third quarter of 1998.
FIRST NINE MONTHS OF 1998 COMPARED WITH FIRST NINE MONTHS OF 1997
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 decreased to $521.2
million from $559.5 million in 1997, while operating income decreased to $1.7
million as compared to $20.7 million in the comparable 1997 period. Pretax loss
from continuing operations was $8.0 million, compared with pretax income of
$11.9 million for the prior year period. Results of operations included special
charges of $13.8 million and $4.1 million for the nine months ended September
30, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
The Company's results from continuing operations before extraordinary charges,
were negatively impacted by continued softness in the electronics distribution
business and reduced gross profit margins caused by competitive market
conditions and the special charges discussed below. Partially offsetting these
factors were generally lower operating expenses.
In third quarter of 1998, the Company incurred a pretax charge of $8.0 million
to write off the investment and provide for related commitments for the
discontinuance of the use and development of the SAP business system. The
Company also wrote-off the related cost of the SAP system which was in operation
for the Graphics business ($3 million before tax charge as part of discontinued
operations). As part of a company-wide business system project, SAP was
initially implemented as the business system for Graphics and was planned for
implementation in the Electronics and Recreational Products Groups. In light
45
<PAGE> 50
of the sale of Graphics and the impending sale of EDG, the Company did not
believe the cost to implement, maintain and further develop SAP for the
Remaining Businesses could be justified. In addition, the Company recorded a
special pretax charge of $5.8 million for employee separation and related exit
costs associated with a resizing program for electronics ($3.9 million) and
corporate operations ($1.9 million). In association with the resizing, the
Company reduced its work force by approximately 85 employees primarily in
management and support positions. While the resizing predominantly impacted EDG
and related corporate support operations in response to electronics industry
conditions, the Company anticipates further significant corporate cost
reductions after the sale of EDG. Management expects these annual savings to be
approximately $8 million to $9 million, before tax effects.
Also, in the third quarter of 1998, the Company completed the sale of its
Graphics business for a net purchase price of approximately $40 million,
resulting in a pretax gain of approximately $3.0 million (after-tax $1.7
million, or $.19 per share). The final purchase price is subject to certain post
closing adjustments which are not expected to be material.
In the first quarter of 1997 the Company completed the acquisition of Milgray
Electronics, Inc. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded a
special before-tax charge of $4.1 million for costs associated with the
integration of Milgray, including provision for severance costs, related exit
costs, and costs related to supplier terminations. In addition, the Company
recorded an extraordinary charge of $675,000 ($.07 per share), net of taxes,
relating to the early retirement of senior notes, which were replaced under the
Company's new credit facility.
Sales of the Electronic Group for the nine months ended September 30, 1998,
decreased to $483.3 million as compared to $523.1 million in the comparable 1997
period while operating income after the special charges discussed above,
decreased to $17.2 million from $26.9 million in the 1997 period. Sales for the
nine month period ended September 30, 1998 were primarily impacted by
industry-wide market weakness resulting in reduced shipments of electronic
components. Operating income declined for the nine month period reflecting lower
gross profit margins caused by intensified competitive pricing pressures and the
special charges noted above.
Sales of the Recreational Products Group for the nine months ended September 30,
1998 increased to $37.9 million from $36.4 million in the comparable 1997 period
and operating income increased to $2.7 million from $2.5 million in the 1997
period. Growth for the nine month period is primarily attributable to the
Company's expansion to Michigan partially offset by the negative effect of
warmer weather conditions on winter product shipments during the third quarter
of 1998.
As a percentage of sales, cost of products sold for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998 increased to 79.6% from 77.7%, while selling and
administrative expenses, as a percent of sales, decreased to 16.1% from 16.7%.
Lower operating expenses reflected the Company's cost reduction efforts and
resizing programs. In 1998, the Company recorded a 21.6% tax benefit compared to
a 47.9% tax provision for the comparable 1997 period. The effective tax rates
differ from the combined statutory rate of approximately 40% due primarily to
the effect of non-deductible goodwill relative to accounting income or loss for
the period.
46
<PAGE> 51
1997 COMPARED WITH 1996
Overall, the Company's net sales in 1997 increased to $734.4 million compared to
$506.1 million in 1996. Increased sales primarily reflected the acquisition of
Milgray Electronics in January 1997, offset by weakness in certain segments of
the Electronics Group. Although sales increased, the Company's profitability
declined as a result of increased competitive pressures on gross margins,
transition costs associated with the integration of Milgray, increased goodwill
amortization, and higher interest costs.
Electronics Group sales increased 49% to $688.2 million as compared to 1996.
Operating income, after the integration charge, increased 7% to $35.3 million.
Increased sales and operating income over 1996 reflected the Milgray
acquisition, partially offset by lower sales of electronic components, primarily
memory based products, and transition costs associated with the combination of
the Bell-Milgray operations. Lower sales of electronic components were partially
offset by stronger performance in the Company's computer systems and services
business.
Recreational Products Group sales increased 6% to $46.2 million as operating
income decreased 15% to $2.9 million. Growth in sales and the reduction to
operating income reflected the Group's expansion in Michigan and associated
start up costs.
Cost of products sold as a percentage of sales increased to 77.8% compared to
76.7% in 1996, reflecting increased competitive market pressures on gross
margins in certain segments, primarily in the Electronics Group. Selling and
administrative expenses as a percentage of sales of 16.8% remained consistent
with the prior year. The Company's income tax rate increased to 48% in 1997 from
42% in 1996 primarily as a result of increased non-deductible goodwill for
income tax purposes.
Since acquiring Milgray in January 1997, the Company devoted considerable effort
into integrating the electronics distribution operations to establish a unified
selling organization. In July 1997, the Company successfully completed the
installation of the Bell computer business system for the former Milgray
operations. During 1997 and 1998, the Company consolidated four distribution
centers to its new distribution center in Southern California.
1996 COMPARED WITH 1995
For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company's net sales increased 3% to
$506.1 million and operating income was $27.5 million, consistent with the prior
year. In 1995, operating income, before interest expense totaled $27.4 million
and included a before-tax gain on sale of division of $3.1 million partially
offset by a $2.8 million before-tax lease commitment provision. Income from
continuing operations was $13.9 million in 1996 and $13.8 million in 1995.
Sales of the Electronics Group increased 3% to $462.4 million and operating
income decreased 7% to $33 million. Excluding the $3.1 million gain on division
sale in 1995, operating income increased 2% in 1996. Sales and income
performance reflected increased sales of microcomputer systems and services,
partially offset by reduced shipments of electronic components. Protracted
weakness in the electronics market and the termination of the Company's National
Semiconductor franchise impacted shipments of components, particularly during
the second half of 1996.
Recreational Products Group sales for the year increased 3% to $43.7 million
while operating income decreased 4% to $3.4 million. Operating results were
affected by severe
47
<PAGE> 52
winter weather conditions in the upper Midwest which continued throughout the
first half of the year, as well as costs related to expanding into Michigan.
Cost of products sold as a percentage of sales increased slightly (76.7% from
76.4%) as a result of product mix changes. Selling and administrative expenses
as a percentage of sales decreased to 16.8% from 16.9% due to ongoing cost
control efforts. The Company's income tax rate was approximately 42% in 1996 and
1995.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Selected financial position data is set forth in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
SEPTEMBER 30, --------------
1998 1997 1996
------------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current ratio..................................... 2.8:1 3.1:1 2.8:1
Long-term liabilities to total capitalization..... 45% 54% 18%
Days' sales in receivables........................ 50 52 47
Days' sales in inventories........................ 88 101 84
</TABLE>
Net cash provided by operating activities was $30.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 1998, compared to net cash used in operating activities of
$1.0 million for the comparable 1997 period. Increased operating cash flows
resulted from working capital reductions, primarily inventory. Operating cash
flows were used to reduce borrowings under the Company's line of credit and to
fund property additions, including improvements to the Company's electronics
distribution center in Ontario, California. In 1998, investing cash flows
included proceeds from the sale of Graphics which were used to reduce borrowings
under the Company's line of credit. In 1997, financing cash flows included bank
borrowings used to fund the acquisition of Milgray and the retirement of senior
notes.
Cash used in operating activities was $3.1 million in 1997 while operating
activities generated cash of $37.5 million in 1996. Operating cash flows in 1997
were impacted by reduced earnings and increased investment in working capital.
Financing cash flows included bank borrowings used to fund the acquisition of
Milgray, and retirement of the Company's outstanding 9.7% Senior Notes,
including approximately $1 million in make-whole premiums. Property additions
included investment in the Company's information systems, completion of its new
national service center in El Segundo, California as well as improvements to a
new electronics distribution center. The acquisition of the 265,000 square foot
distribution center, located in Ontario, California, was financed through the
assumption of Industrial Revenue Bonds due in 2015. The distribution center and
related bonds were recorded at estimated fair market value of $6.2 million.
Concurrent with the acquisition of Milgray, the Company entered into a five-year
$250 million secured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The
new facility, which replaced the Company's $50 million line of credit, includes
a $50 million term loan, payable quarterly over five years, and a revolving
credit line.
In October 1998, the Company agreed to sell its Electronics Distribution Group.
The transaction is subject to shareholder approval, along with customary
regulatory review and is anticipated to close early in 1999. The Company will
use a portion of the net proceeds from the sale to pay off its indebtedness
under its credit facility. In addition, the Company intends to make a cash
distribution to shareholders ranging between $50 million to $60 million
48
<PAGE> 53
approximately 90 days after the closing. The Company expects to record a
significant accounting loss on the transaction of approximately $60 to $65
million before tax effects.
The Company believes that sufficient cash resources exist to support
requirements for operations and commitments during the period through the close
of the proposed sale of EDG through available cash, bank borrowings and cash
generated from operations. It is anticipated that the proceeds from the sale
will be used to fund the retirement of Bell's current bank debt, transaction
costs, taxes, and the distribution to shareholders. The Company has received
preliminary approval from its primary lender for a line of credit in the amount
of $20 million to finance working capital needs to operate and grow the
Remaining Businesses during the first 12 to 18 months after the sale of EDG.
Management believes that it has access to additional financing as required.
In 1997, the Company initiated a project to ensure all its business systems as
well as non-informational systems, such as HVAC systems, building security,
elevators, phone systems and other related systems are Year 2000 compliant. The
Year 2000 project encompasses three major phases: Inventory -- taking stock of
the various applications and systems in use by the Company;
Assessment -- analyzing the exposure of Year 2000 issues in the various
applications and systems; and Renovation -- taking action to correct Year 2000
deficiencies noted in the assessment phases. The Company anticipates achieving
Year 2000 compliance over 1998 and 1999 by converting certain of its business
systems to Year 2000 hardware and software platforms and by reprogramming other
business systems. To date, the Inventory and Assessment phases of critical
systems and support functions are complete and renovation is underway.
Implementation of Year 2000 compliant business systems has begun and is
anticipated to be completed by the second quarter of 1999. As a contingency
plan, the Company has completed the reprogramming of significant existing
business systems for Year 2000 compliance in the event that new business systems
are not operational by 2000. The Company does not have any other contingency
plans at this time. In addition, the Company has identified and prioritized and
is communicating with its material suppliers and third party providers
("Material Third Parties") to determine their Year 2000 status and any probable
impact on Bell. Bell will continue to track and evaluate its long-term
relationship with Material Third Parties based on the responses it receives and
on information learned from other sources. If any of Bell's Material Third
Parties are not Year 2000 ready and their non-compliance causes a material
disruption to any of their respective businesses, Bell's business could be
materially adversely affected. Bell will continue to evaluate the nature of
these risks, but at this time Bell is unable to determine the probability that
any such risk will occur, or if it does occur, what the nature, length or other
effects, if any, it may have on Bell. If a significant number of Material Third
Parties experience failures in their computer systems or operations due to not
being Year 2000 compliant, it could affect Bell's ability to process
transactions or otherwise engage in similar normal business activities. While
this risk is outside of Bell's control, Bell has instituted the program
mentioned above to identify Material Third Parties and to address any
non-compliance issues. The estimated cost of the Year 2000 project has not been
and is not expected to be material to the Company's financial position or
results of operations. Although Bell believes its business systems will be Year
2000 compliant on or before December 31, 1999, the Company makes no assurances
regarding the success of this program, or that third party systems will be Year
2000 compliant. The Company cannot be assured that failure to achieve Year 2000
compliance will not have a material impact on the Company's business.
49
<PAGE> 54
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Proxy Statement, as it may be amended or supplemented, and certain
documents incorporated by reference herein contain or may contain both
statements of historical fact and "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, statements to the effect that the Company or management
"expects" or "anticipates" certain events or results to occur, or that the
Company or management will "endeavor" to achieve certain results. There are
certain important factors that could cause future results to differ materially
from those anticipated by management in the forward-looking statements. Among
these important factors are: the ability of the Company to realize cost savings
as a result of the disposition of EDG and Graphics; international and domestic
economic conditions; competitive pressures in the electronic components
industry; increased consolidation of such industry; rapid technological changes;
demand for products containing electronic components; loss of product lines; and
continued and/or increased pressure on profit margins.
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
Pursuant to the California Corporations Code, holders of shares of Common Stock
are not entitled to rights of appraisal in connection with the Sale.
50
<PAGE> 55
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
The complete text of the Acquisition Agreement, excluding its Schedules, has
been filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date
October 1, 1998. See "Additional Information."
ASSETS TO BE SOLD
The Acquisition Agreement provides for the sale by the Company to Arrow of
substantially all of the assets of EDG.
ASSETS TO BE TRANSFERRED
The assets to be sold to Arrow (the "Assets") include all of the assets of EDG
other than the Excluded Assets (as defined below), including: (i) owned real
property; (ii) real property leases and subleases; (iii) inventory; (iv)
accounts receivable; (v) tangible personal property; (vi) personal property
leases; (vii) business contracts; (viii) prepaid expenses; (ix) intangible
personal property and (x) all other assets and properties of Company used in the
business of EDG and not otherwise excluded.
EXCLUDED ASSETS
The assets being retained by the Company (the "Excluded Assets") include: (i)
cash and other cash equivalents; (ii) insurance policies; (iii) assets owned or
held by employee benefit plans; (iv) tax refunds or credits;(v) excluded real
estate; and (vi) all assets and properties of Company not used in connection
with EDG.
ASSUMED LIABILITIES
Arrow will assume all of the Company's obligations relating to EDG (other than
the Retained Liabilities), including but not limited to: (i) real property lease
obligations; (ii) accounts payable; (iii) personal property lease obligations;
(iv) obligations under contracts, licenses, and industrial revenue bonds; (v)
obligations under certain employment agreements and severance agreements; (vi)
accrued expenses; (vii) product defect liabilities; (viii) litigation claims
arising out of the activities of EDG; and (x) all liabilities reflected or
reserved against on the Audited Balance Sheet (as defined below).
RETAINED LIABILITIES
The Company will retain those liabilities that are not being assumed by Arrow
(the "Retained Liabilities"). These Retained Liabilities include: (i) taxes
other than the assumed tax liabilities; (ii) certain employment and severance
agreements; (iii) employee benefit plan liabilities; (iv) post-retirement
medical plan liabilities; (v) retained litigation claims; (vi) obligations
arising in connection with excluded assets; (vii) retained sales tax
liabilities; and (viii) all obligations of the Company related to businesses of
the Company other than EDG.
CLOSING
The closing of the Sale will take place at 10:00 a.m., local time, on the
earliest practicable date after all of the conditions to the Sale shall have
been satisfied or waived, but in any event not later than three (3) business
days after such date. See "-- Conditions."
51
<PAGE> 56
PAYMENT AT CLOSING
Prior to the closing, the Company will prepare an estimated balance sheet of EDG
as of a recent date. The closing cash payment will be approximately $187.6
million if Bell's net investment in EDG as shown on the estimated balance sheet
is $155 million or more, less $20 million as a "hold-back" of the purchase price
to cover any deficiencies in such net investment revealed on a final
post-closing balance sheet. The amount held-back will be paid to Bell 90 days
after closing to the extent such deficiencies do not exist. The closing cash
payment will be adjusted dollar for dollar to the extent Bell's net investment
in EDG is less than $155 million. If, however, the net investment in EDG is less
than $135 million, then Arrow may, at its option, either terminate the
Acquisition Agreement or reduce the closing cash payment, as previously
described.
At October 1, 1998 (the date the Acquisition Agreement was signed) Bell's net
investment in EDG was $154.5 million and at November 30, 1998, such investment
was $151.7 million.
PURCHASE PRICE ADJUSTMENT
After the closing, Arrow will prepare, and its accountants will certify within
90 days of the closing, a balance sheet (the "Preliminary Audited Balance
Sheet") as of the closing date for EDG. The Company and its independent public
accountants will have the right to observe, review and comment upon the
preparation of the Preliminary Audited Balance Sheet, including the right to
observe the taking of a physical inventory. In the event of a dispute between
the parties, the dispute will be submitted to a mutually agreed-upon nationally
recognized independent public accounting firm. At the end of this process, a
final balance sheet will be delivered to the Company and Arrow.
If the net investment in EDG shown on the Audited Balance Sheet is $155 million,
there will be no change to the final purchase price. If the net investment is
above or below $155 million, then the final purchase price will be increased or
decreased dollar-for-dollar, provided the increase may not exceed $10 million.
If the final purchase price is greater than the closing cash payment, Arrow will
pay the Company such difference with interest at 6% per annum. If the purchase
price is less than the closing cash payment, the Company will pay to Arrow such
difference with like interest thereon.
Bell may not distribute any proceeds or make other distributions to shareholders
until completion of the Audited Balance Sheet.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Acquisition Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of
the Company and Arrow.
The representations and warranties made by the parties to the Acquisition
Agreement will survive the Closing until the earlier of (i) two (2) years after
the Closing Date and (ii) either (A) the liquidation of the Company or (B) the
merger of the Company with, or the sale of all of the Company's equity to, an
acquiring person.
52
<PAGE> 57
CERTAIN COVENANTS
GENERAL
The Company has agreed that it will (i) maintain EDG only in the ordinary course
and consistent with its past practice, and allow Arrow's representatives to
observe its operations; (ii) use its best efforts to preserve EDG's business and
organization intact; (iii) use its best efforts to maintain present employees;
(iv) permit certain communications between employees and Arrow; (iv) not modify
or change any existing contract or renew or extend any existing lease, except in
the ordinary course, consistent with past practice; (v) not open any new
facility; (vi) not hire or fire any employee earning more than $100,000 per
year, except for cause; (vii) not make any capital expenditures, additions, or
improvements in excess of $250,000; (viii) consult with and advise Arrow with
respect to inventory management; (ix) obtain necessary consents in connection
with the Sale; (x) cooperate with Arrow; and (xi) give Arrow reasonable access
to information about EDG.
EXPENSES
The Acquisition Agreement provides that each party will bear its own expenses
incurred in connection with the Sale. In addition, the parties agree that
neither party shall be liable to the other party for damages or other payments,
except in the following circumstances: if the Acquisition Agreement is
terminated by the Company either (i) in connection with its acceptance of an
alternative proposal to acquire the Assets or EDG, (ii) if the Company's
shareholders do not approve the Sale and the Proxy Statement relating to the
Sale discloses any such alternative proposal, then, in either case, the Company
shall pay Arrow an expense reimbursement of $5,000,000 (or, if in the case of
clause (ii), the Proxy Statement does not disclose any such proposal, $750,000);
or (iii) if Closing shall not occur due to a willful breach of a Closing
condition by either party, the party in breach shall pay the other party an
expense reimbursement of $5,000,000.
INDEMNIFICATION
Each party to the Acquisition Agreement has agreed to indemnify the other party
against any losses resulting from (i) any misrepresentation or breach of
warranty; (ii) any failure of the representations and warranties; and (iii) any
failure to perform or otherwise fulfill any covenant or agreement made in the
Acquisition Agreement. The parties agree that no indemnification claim shall be
made until the sum of such losses reaches a threshold of $1,000,000, at which
point the party seeking indemnification may make a claim for the entire amount
of such losses, including the initial $1,000,000. Such indemnification rights
survive only as long as the survival period of the representations and
warranties. See "-- Representations and Warranties."
EXCLUSIVITY
The Company has agreed that neither it, its affiliates nor its representatives
or agents will initiate any discussions or negotiations with any entity
concerning any transaction to acquire the Assets of EDG. The Company may provide
information (pursuant to customary confidentiality agreements) or enter into
discussions or negotiations regarding a bona fide unsolicited alternative
proposal to consummate such a transaction provided that the Company: (i) has not
yet received shareholder approval for the transactions
53
<PAGE> 58
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement; (ii) acts upon advice from its legal
counsel that such actions with respect to an alternative proposal are required;
and (iii) communicates the terms of any alternative proposal to Arrow.
EMPLOYMENT AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Arrow has agreed to offer employment to employees of the Company engaged in EDG
(such employees who accept Arrow's offer of employment are referred to herein as
the "Continuing Employees"). To the extent any employee benefit plans are made
available to Continuing Employees (such employee benefit plans, programs and/or
policies are referred to herein as "Plans"), (i) service with the Company by any
such employee prior to the Closing shall be credited for eligibility and vesting
purposes under the Plans (but not for benefit accrual purposes) and (ii) with
respect to any Plans which are welfare plans, all pre-existing condition
exclusions shall be waived.
CONDITIONS
The obligations of the parties to consummate the Sale are subject to customary
closing conditions, including obtaining clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Act ("HSR Act") relating to anti-trust matters. As of the date of this Proxy
Statement, the waiting period under the HSR Act has elapsed without any
notification from the FTC or the Justice Department that further information is
required. All of the closing conditions in the Acquisition Agreement may be
waived except for the approvals of Bell shareholders and the Boards of Directors
of both Bell and Arrow.
Arrow's obligation to consummate the Sale is also subject to there being no
material adverse change since June 30, 1998 in the Assets or the business of EDG
and the encumbrances on the Assets created under the Company's Credit Agreement
having been released.
The Company's obligations to consummate the Sale is subject to shareholders'
approval and the consent of the lenders under the Credit Agreement. As of the
date of this Proxy Statement, the lenders under the Credit Agreement have
indicated that they will consent to the Sale, provided that, as contemplated,
the indebtedness owed to such lenders is repaid at the closing of the Sale.
TERMINATION
The obligations of the parties may be terminated on or prior to the Closing
Date: (i) by mutual consent; (ii) by either the Company or Arrow, if (A) the
Closing has not occurred on or before March 31, 1999, (B) HSR Act clearance has
not been obtained, or (C) the approval of the Company's shareholders has not
been obtained; (iii) by the Company, if it receives an alternative proposal to
acquire EDG or the Assets providing for terms better than those offered by
Arrow; or (iv) by Arrow, if (A) the Company's Board of Directors shall have
withdrawn its approval of the sale to Arrow or shall have recommended an
alternative proposal to acquire EDG or the Assets, or (B) if the net investment
shown on the Estimated Balance Sheet is less than $135 million.
54
<PAGE> 59
DESCRIPTION OF THE OPTION AGREEMENT
As a condition to the Sale, Arrow has required that the Company grant Arrow an
option (the "OPTION") to purchase up to approximately 19.9% of the Company's
Common Stock outstanding on the date of the Acquisition Agreement, or 1,888,000
shares, at an exercise price of $10.531 per share. On December 22, 1998, the
closing price of the Company's common stock on the NYSE was $10.75. The exercise
price was based on the average of the closing prices of the Company's Common
Stock for each of the ten days prior to announcement of the Sale. The Option
becomes exercisable by Arrow only if one or more of the following events occur,
and for 180 after any such occurrence: (1) the Company terminates the
Acquisition Agreement to pursue another transaction; (2) the Company's
shareholders fail to approve the Sale where this Proxy Statement discloses an
alternative transaction, or (3) the Company willfully breaches a closing
condition in the Acquisition Agreement. In addition, Arrow has a right to
require the Company to repurchase at a formula price the Option or the shares
acquired by Arrow if it has exercised the Option. This formula price would be
the exercise price of the Option plus an amount equal to the excess of the
market price for the Common Stock over the exercise price or, if higher, the
price offered for the Common Stock by a third party tender offeror. If the
Option is exercised, Bell also grants Arrow registration rights on the shares
issued to Arrow pursuant to the Option. A Stock Option Agreement dated the same
date as the Acquisition Agreement defines the terms and condition of the Option
in detail and is filed as an exhibit to the Company Current Report on Form 8-K,
event date October 1, 1998.
INFORMATION REGARDING SHAREHOLDERS
PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERS
As of October 1, 1998, Cede & Co., a nominee of securities depositories for
various segments of the financial industry, held approximately 8,289,000 shares
representing 89% of the Company's outstanding common stock, none of which was
owned beneficially by such organization. Based upon reports filed through
October 31, 1998 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company
believes that only the entities named below beneficially own 5% or more of the
Company's common stock:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENT
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
------------------------------------ ----------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Newsouth Capital Management...................... 493,533 5.2%
1000 Ridgeway Loop Road, Suite 233
Memphis, Tennessee 38120
Dimensional Fund Advisors........................ 487,991 5.2%
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401
The TCW Group, Inc............................... 486,092 5.2%
865 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
</TABLE>
The Company is unable to determine the persons having voting control for the
entities listed in the above table nor does it know how these entities will vote
on the proposed Sale.
55
<PAGE> 60
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS
The following table shows the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock
of each director and officer of the Company, as well as the beneficial ownership
of Common Stock of all directors and executive officers of the Company as a
group as of October 1, 1998. All ownership of Common Stock is direct.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND NATURE
NAME AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION OF BENEFICIAL PERCENT
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
----------------------------- ----------------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
John J. Cost........................................ 17,506(2) (1)
Secretary and Director
Of Counsel Irell & Manella LLP, Attorneys
Anthony L. Craig.................................... 14,938(2) (1)
Director
President, Global Knowledge Network
Herbert S. Davidson,................................ 1,000 (1)
Vice Chairman of the Board
Tracy A. Edwards.................................... 53,601(3) (1)
Executive Vice President -- Finance and
Operations,
and Chief Financial Officer
Gordon Graham....................................... 33,482(4) (1)
President and Chief Executive Officer
and Director
D. J. Hough......................................... 98,780(5) 1.0%
Senior Vice President
and Chief Information Officer
Peter A. Resnick.................................... 840(6) (1)
Vice President and Corporate Controller
Milton Rosenberg, Director.......................... 20,000(2) (1)
Private investor and consultant
Charles S. Troy..................................... 14,444(2) (1)
Vice President
Stephen A. Weeks.................................... 3,329(7) (1)
Vice President and Treasurer
Theodore Williams................................... 342,154(4) 3.6%
Chairman of the Board
All directors and executive officers as a
group(11)......................................... 600,074(8) 6.3%
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Less than 1% of the outstanding.
(2) Includes 14,800 shares with respect to each of Messrs. Cost, Rosenberg and
Craig, and 13,800 with respect to Mr. Troy, issuable pursuant to currently
exercisable stock options issued under Bell's Non-employee Directors' Stock
Option Plan.
(3) Includes 36,721 shares issuable pursuant to currently exercisable stock
options.
(4) Includes 7,512 shares with respect to Mr. Graham and 9,000 shares with
respect to Mr. Williams issuable pursuant to currently exercisable stock
options.
(5) Includes 42,275 shares issuable pursuant to currently exercisable stock
options.
(6) Includes 360 shares issuable pursuant to currently exercisable options.
(7) Includes 1,020 shares issuable pursuant to currently exercisable stock
options.
(8) Includes 155,088 shares issuable pursuant to currently exercisable stock
options.
56
<PAGE> 61
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors is not aware of any other business which may be properly
presented for action at the Special Meeting. Unless otherwise directed, all
shares represented by the persons named in the accompanying Proxy will be voted
in favor of the Sale to Arrow. If any other matters come before the Special
Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying Proxy will vote on those matters
according to their best judgment.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
If a shareholder wishes to have a proposal printed in the Proxy Statement to be
used in connection with the Company's next Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
tentatively scheduled for May 11, 1999, such a proposal must be received by Bell
at its Corporate Office prior to December 18, 1998.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as the independent accountants for the Company
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997. A representative of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the Special Meeting and
to be available to respond to any questions directed to PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP by shareholders of the Company. The representative will have an opportunity
to make a statement if PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP desires.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents previously filed by the Company with the Securities and
Commission are incorporated by reference into this document: (i) the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, (ii) Reports on
Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1998, June 30, 1998, and September
30, 1998, (iii) Current Report on Form 8-K/A, event date September 14, 1998,
which includes pro forma financial information giving effect to the discontinued
operations of Graphics for each of the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995 and the six month periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and (iv) Current
Report on Form 8-K, event date October 1, 1998. All documents filed by the
Company with the Commission after the date of this Proxy Statement and prior to
the date of the Special Meeting shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference.
Any statement contained or incorporated in this Proxy Statement shall be deemed
to be modified or superseded to the extent that a statement contained herein (or
in any subsequently filed document) modifies or supersedes such statement.
57
<PAGE> 62
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
The Company's Annual Report to Shareholders which includes financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, was sent to the Shareholders on
or about March 20, 1998. Copies of the Company's most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, including financial statements, can be obtained without
charge by holders of the Company's Common Stock by contacting the corporate
office at 2201 E. El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, California 90245-4608.
BY ORDER OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John J. Cost, Secretary
December 23, 1998
58
<PAGE> 63
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants........................... F-2
Consolidated Statement of Income for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1997..................... F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and 1996.... F-4
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997..... F-5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1997............... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-7
Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)................. F-17
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 (unaudited)............. F-19
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998
and December 31, 1997 (unaudited)......................... F-20
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 (unaudited)............. F-21
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)............................................... F-22
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE> 64
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Bell Industries, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying
index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bell
Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 28, 1998, except as to
"Subsequent Events" note,
which is as of November 24, 1998
F-2
<PAGE> 65
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales..................................... $734,449 $506,062 $490,966
-------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold....................... 571,344 387,876 375,168
Selling and administrative.................. 123,158 84,924 82,863
Depreciation and amortization............... 9,196 5,736 5,755
Interest.................................... 12,309 3,673 3,612
Integration charge.......................... 4,100
Lease commitment provision.................. 2,800
Gain on sale of division.................... (3,050)
-------- -------- --------
720,107 482,209 467,148
-------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes and extraordinary loss......... 14,342 23,853 23,818
Income tax provision.......................... 6,823 9,992 10,008
-------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.......................... 7,519 13,861 13,810
Income from discontinued operations, net of
tax......................................... 2,562 2,066 1,161
Loss on early retirement of debt, net of
tax......................................... (675)
-------- -------- --------
Net income.................................... $ 9,406 $ 15,927 $ 14,971
======== ======== ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA
BASIC
Income from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.......................... $ 0.82 $ 1.57 $ 1.60
Income from discontinued operations, net of
tax......................................... 0.28 0.23 0.14
Loss on early retirement of debt, net of
tax......................................... (0.07)
-------- -------- --------
Net income.................................... $ 1.03 $ 1.80 $ 1.74
======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares................ 9,157 8,852 8,626
======== ======== ========
DILUTED
Income from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.......................... $ 0.80 $ 1.52 $ 1.54
Income from discontinued operations, net of
tax......................................... 0.27 0.23 0.13
Loss on early retirement of debt, net of
tax......................................... (0.07)
-------- -------- --------
Net income.................................... $ 1.00 $ 1.75 $ 1.67
======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares................ 9,430 9,109 8,940
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
<PAGE> 66
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
--------------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 5,377 $ 12,097
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $2,673 and $1,626................................... 120,900 83,155
Inventories............................................... 173,801 104,049
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 8,990 5,820
-------- --------
Total current assets.............................. 309,068 205,121
-------- --------
Properties, at cost
Land...................................................... 3,419 1,397
Buildings and improvements................................ 21,283 11,049
Equipment................................................. 41,642 34,361
-------- --------
66,344 46,807
Less accumulated depreciation............................. (24,265) (24,758)
-------- --------
Total properties.................................. 42,079 22,049
-------- --------
Goodwill, less accumulated amortization of $9,344 and
$6,199.................................................... 72,758 8,795
Other assets................................................ 7,328 5,345
-------- --------
$431,233 $241,310
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 67,121 $ 43,839
Accrued payroll........................................... 9,265 7,663
Accrued liabilities....................................... 17,170 12,687
Current portion of long-term liabilities.................. 7,500 8,076
-------- --------
Total current liabilities......................... 101,056 72,265
-------- --------
Long-term debt.............................................. 172,330 24,571
Deferred compensation and other............................. 6,495 6,013
Shareholders' equity
Preferred Stock
Authorized -- 1,000,000 shares
Outstanding -- none
Common stock
Authorized -- 35,000,000 shares
Outstanding -- 9,326,391 and 7,518,277 shares.......... 100,410 75,666
Reinvested earnings....................................... 50,942 62,795
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity........................ 151,352 138,461
-------- --------
Commitments and contingencies
$431,233 $241,310
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
<PAGE> 67
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK OTHER
--------------------- PAID-IN REINVESTED
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS
--------- -------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994........ 6,497,557 $ 1,624 $ 54,080 $ 46,066
Employee stock plans.............. 74,415 441 388
Net income........................ 14,971
5% stock dividend................. 326,122 82 6,441 (6,524)
Change in par value of common
stock.......................... 60,909 (60,909)
--------- -------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995........ 6,898,094 63,056 -- 54,513
Employee stock plans.............. 115,525 1,933
Net income........................ 15,927
5% stock dividend................. 351,510 7,645 (7,645)
Purchases of businesses........... 153,148 3,032
--------- -------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996........ 7,518,277 75,666 -- 62,795
Employee stock plans.............. 274,061 3,361
Net income........................ 9,406
20% stock dividend................ 1,522,821 21,259 (21,259)
Exercise of warrants and other.... 11,232 124
--------- -------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997........ 9,326,391 $100,410 $ -- $ 50,942
========= ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
<PAGE> 68
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
---------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income................................. $ 9,406 $ 15,927 $ 14,971
Depreciation and amortization.............. 6,294 5,541 5,342
Amortization of intangibles................ 3,706 687 598
Provision for losses on accounts
receivable.............................. 2,138 1,235 1,716
Integration charge......................... 4,100
Loss on early retirement of debt........... 675
Gain on sale of division................... (3,050)
Lease commitment provision................. 2,800
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions............................ (29,374) 14,061 (19,459)
--------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities............... (3,055) 37,451 2,918
--------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of businesses.................... (100,404) (10,815) (3,419)
Purchases of properties.................... (16,195) (9,573) (5,019)
Proceeds from sale of division............. 7,754
--------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing
activities......................... (116,599) (20,388) (684)
--------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on Senior Notes and capital
leases.................................. (25,633) (6,918) (5,675)
Bank borrowings (payments), net............ 137,852 (4,800) 3,800
Debt issuance costs........................ ( 2,770)
Employee stock plans and other............. 3,485 1,933 829
--------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities............... 112,934 (9,785) (1,046)
--------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents................................ (6,720) 7,278 1,188
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year....................................... 12,097 4,819 3,631
--------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year..... $ 5,377 $ 12,097 $ 4,819
========= ======== ========
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions:
Accounts receivable..................... $ (1,734) $ 2,634 $ (9,288)
Inventories............................. (19,577) 22,917 (24,341)
Accounts payable........................ (3,173) (5,259) 7,011
Accrued liabilities and other........... (4,890) (6,231) 7,159
--------- -------- --------
Net change............................ $ (29,374) $ 14,061 $(19,459)
========= ======== ========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid.............................. $ 12,023 $ 3,863 $ 3,759
Income taxes paid.......................... $ 3,762 $ 12,624 $ 11,190
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
<PAGE> 69
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. All
significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Statement of cash flows -- The Company considers all highly liquid investments
purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Revenue recognition and receivables -- The Company is primarily a national
distributor of electronic components. In addition, the Company distributes
graphics and electronic imaging products throughout the western and central
United States and recreational-related products in the north central United
States. Sales are recognized and trade receivables are recorded when products
are shipped. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are
limited due to the large number and general dispersion of trade accounts which
constitute the Company's customer base. The Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The
Company estimates reserves for potential credit losses and such losses have been
within these estimates.
Inventories -- Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined using
weighted average and first-in, first-out methods) or market (net realizable
value).
Properties, depreciation and amortization -- All properties are depreciated
using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives which range
from 25 to 40 years for buildings and 2 to 10 years for equipment. Leasehold
improvements and assets recorded under capital leases are amortized over the
shorter of their estimated service lives or the term of the lease.
Goodwill -- Cost in excess of the fair value of net assets of purchased
businesses (goodwill) is amortized using the straight-line method over 25 years.
The Company periodically evaluates the recorded value of its operating assets,
including goodwill, and recognizes impairments when the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows from the use of the assets are less than the recorded
value.
Income taxes -- Provision is made for the tax effects of temporary differences
between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets
and liabilities. In estimating deferred tax balances, the Company considers all
expected future events other than enactments of changes in the tax law or rates.
Stock option plans -- The Company measures and records compensation expense
relating to stock options as the excess, if any, between the market value of
shares on the date of option grant and the expected proceeds upon exercise. Such
expense is accrued ratably over the period to be benefited. The Company has
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123") to disclose the
impact of compensation cost on earnings as determined under the fair value
method prescribed by SFAS No. 123.
Per share data -- Basic earnings per share data is based upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share data is
based upon the
F-7
<PAGE> 70
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common
shares potentially issuable for dilutive securities such as stock options and
warrants which were 273,000 shares, 257,000 shares and 314,000 shares for 1997,
1996 and 1995, respectively.
Use of estimates -- Certain amounts and disclosures included in the consolidated
financial statements required the use of management estimates which could differ
from actual results.
ACQUISITION OF MILGRAY ELECTRONICS
In January 1997, the Company completed the acquisition of Milgray Electronics,
Inc. ("Milgray"), a publicly traded distributor of electronics components. Under
the terms of the acquisition, shareholders of Milgray received $14.77 per share
for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $100 million. The Company
financed the acquisition through borrowings under a credit facility arranged
with a syndicate of banks.
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and
operating results of Milgray are included from the acquisition date in the
financial statements of the Company. The fair value of non-cash assets acquired,
including goodwill, was approximately $167 million and liabilities assumed
totaled approximately $67 million. Goodwill of $67 million is being amortized
over 25 years on a straight-line basis.
In the first quarter of 1997, in conjunction with the acquisition, the Company
recorded a special before-tax charge totaling $4.1 million, for costs associated
with the integration of Milgray, including provisions for severance, lease and
related exit costs, and costs related to supplier terminations. Substantially
all amounts related to the integration were expended during 1997.
The following unaudited pro forma information presents a summary of consolidated
results of operations of the Company and Milgray as if the acquisition had
occurred January 1, 1996. The unaudited pro forma results include estimates for
goodwill amortization and increased interest expense and have been adjusted to
reflect the sale of Graphics (in thousands, except per share):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
--------
<S> <C>
Net sales................................................... $778,200
Income from continuing operations before extraordinary
loss...................................................... $ 15,100
Net income.................................................. $ 16,410
Income from continuing operations before extraordinary loss
per share:
Basic..................................................... $ 1.71
Diluted................................................... $ 1.66
Net income per share:
Basic..................................................... $ 1.85
Diluted................................................... $ 1.80
</TABLE>
F-8
<PAGE> 71
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
-------------------
1997 1996
-------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Bank borrowings........................................... $173,500 $ 8,000
Industrial Revenue Bonds.................................. 6,330
9.70% Senior Notes........................................ 23,714
-------- -------
179,830 31,714
Less current portion...................................... 7,500 7,143
-------- -------
$172,330 $24,571
======== =======
</TABLE>
Concurrent with the acquisition of Milgray, the Company entered into a $250
million secured revolving credit facility expiring in December 2001 with a
syndicate of banks to finance the purchase of Milgray, retire all existing debt
of both companies and provide for ongoing working capital requirements.
Borrowings under the facility are secured by the Company's receivables and
inventories. The new facility, which replaced the Company's previous bank line
of credit, provides for interest at either the bank's reference rate or LIBOR
plus 1.50% (7.4% at December 31, 1997). The facility includes a $50 million term
loan, payable quarterly over five years, and a revolving credit line. The
facility is subject to an annual commitment fee of .375% on the unused line of
credit. The agreement underlying the facility contains provisions for asset
acquisition limits, the maintenance of financial ratios, prohibition of
dividends (other than stock dividends), and other restrictions.
In connection with the placement of the credit facility, the Company redeemed
its outstanding 9.70% Senior Notes for $24.7 million, including $1 million in
make-whole premiums. The transaction resulted in an extraordinary charge in 1997
of $675,000, net of income tax benefit of $419,000.
In February 1997, in connection with the acquisition of a 265,000 square foot
distribution center in Ontario, California, the Company assumed $9 million of
variable rate (approximately 3.5% at December 31, 1997) Industrial Revenue Bonds
due in 2015. The bonds and related distribution center were recorded at an
estimated fair value of $6.2 million. The bonds are secured by a $9 million
irrevocable letter of credit. The fair value of the bonds at December 31, 1997
was approximately $7.2 million as estimated using an interest rate currently
available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
In May 1997, the Company entered into separate interest rate swap agreements
with two banks in an aggregate notional amount of $50 million to manage variable
interest rate exposures. The agreements expire in May 2000. The Company agreed
to exchange, at quarterly intervals, the difference between the Company's
variable pay rate of 90 day LIBOR with the banks' fixed pay rate of 6.6%. The
notional amounts of these agreements do not represent amounts exchanged by the
parties and thus, are not a measure of the exposure to the Company. While it is
the Company's intention to hold these contracts
F-9
<PAGE> 72
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
through expiration, the cost to terminate the swap agreements was $840,000 at
December 31, 1997, based on the fair value of the swap agreements as determined
by reference to current interest rates and agreements with similar terms.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998................................. $ 7,500
1999................................. $ 10,000
2000................................. $ 12,500
2001................................. $143,500
</TABLE>
COMMON STOCK
In May 1997, the Board of Directors declared a 20% stock dividend payable to
shareholders of record on May 30, 1997. In May 1996, the Board of Directors
declared a 5% stock dividend payable to shareholders of record on May 24, 1996.
In May 1995, the Board of Directors declared a 5% stock dividend payable to
shareholders of record on May 26, 1995. Share and per share amounts were
adjusted to give effect to the dividends.
At the 1996 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved a proposal to increase the
number of authorized shares of common stock from 10 million to 35 million.
At the 1995 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved a plan to change the Company's
state of incorporation from Delaware to California. Effective June 30, 1995, the
plan was completed and each share of Bell Delaware common stock ($.25 par value)
was converted to one share of Bell California common stock. This change resulted
in the transfer of $60.9 million from other paid-in capital to common stock on
that date.
STOCK PLANS AND WARRANTS
The Company's 1990 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "1990 Plan") and 1994
Stock Option Plan (the "1994 Plan") each authorized 500,000 shares of common
stock to be available for purchase by employees. At the 1997 Annual Meeting, the
shareholders approved an amendment to the 1994 Plan which authorized an
additional 500,000 shares of common stock. At the 1996 Annual Meeting the
shareholders approved the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "1996
Plan"), which authorized 150,000 shares of common stock to be available for
purchase by non-employee directors of the Company.
Under the stock option plans, both incentive and nonqualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights and restricted stock may be granted. Options
outstanding under the plans generally have a maximum term of five years, vest
over four years and were issued at market value. During May 1997, the Company
repriced options granted from June 30, 1994 through January 15, 1997. The
repricing reduced the exercise price of previously issued options to $14.38
which represented the quoted market price on the date of repricing.
Approximately 486,000 options were repriced. The repricing also includes a
provision that requires the stock price to be $1.00 above the original grant
price in order for the options to become exercisable. Weighted average exercise
prices at December 31, 1997 include the effect of the repricing.
F-10
<PAGE> 73
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
A summary of activity under the plans follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
AVAILABLE SHARES EXERCISE FAIR VALUE
FOR FUTURE UNDER PRICE PER OF OPTION
GRANT OPTION SHARE PER SHARE
---------- --------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31,
1994............................ 572,556 455,904 $14.67
Granted......................... (118,500) 118,500 23.75 $7.98
Exercised....................... (16,300) 6.68
Canceled........................ 10,711 (11,284) 10.85
Adjustment for 5% stock
dividend..................... 28,327 22,790
-------- --------- ------
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31,
1995............................ 493,094 569,610 16.28
Granted......................... (161,500) 161,500 20.42 $6.55
Exercised....................... (34,864) 7.88
Canceled........................ 9,439 (9,439) 19.30
Adjustment for 5% stock
dividend..................... 27,629 32,795
Adoption of 1996 Plan........... 150,000
-------- --------- ------
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31,
1996............................ 518,662 719,602 16.83
Granted......................... (533,000) 533,000 19.39 $8.64
Exercised....................... (156,140) 10.72
Canceled........................ 100,272 (100,272) 17.57
Adjustment for 20% stock
dividend..................... 149,165 168,886
Amendment to 1994 Plan.......... 500,000
-------- --------- ------
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31,
1997............................ 735,099 1,165,076 $14.32
======== ========= ======
</TABLE>
A summary of weighted average amounts for stock options outstanding at December
31, 1997 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
REMAINING
OPTION LIFE OPTIONS OPTIONS EXERCISE
IN YEARS OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE PRICE
- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1 59,672 59,672 $ 9.17
2 236,002 135,610 13.38
3 123,232 36,969 14.38
4 172,770 62,637 14.40
5 573,400 -- --
--------- -------
1,165,076 294,888 $12.87
========= =======
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, 204,436 and 100,239 options were exercisable at
weighted average exercise prices of $13.12 and $11.33, respectively.
Under the Bell Industries Employees' Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") 750,000
shares were authorized for future issuance to Bell employees. Eligible employees
may purchase Bell stock at 85% of market value through the ESPP at various
offering times during the
F-11
<PAGE> 74
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
year. Under the ESPP, the Company issued 117,921, 74,024, and 58,115 shares
during 1997, 1996, and 1995. The weighted average fair value per share of the
purchase rights granted in 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $3.90, $4.28 and $4.57. At
December 31, 1997, 704,591 shares were available for future issuance under the
ESPP.
In 1993, the Company's previous senior noteholders received warrants to purchase
258,320 shares of the Company's common stock, exercisable at any time prior to
February 1, 2001 at $9.40 per share. In 1997, warrants representing 8,668 shares
were exercised and warrants to purchase 249,652 shares remain outstanding at
December 31, 1997.
The Black-Scholes model was utilized for estimating the fair value of
stock-based grants using an assumed volatility of approximately 30% and an
expected four year life for stock options, and an assumed volatility of
approximately 10% and an expected four month life for the ESPP. The assumed risk
free interest rate ranged between 5% and 6% for all plans. Stock-based
compensation costs determined under the fair value method would have reduced the
Company's reported net income by $1.2 million ($.13 per share) in 1997, $0.5
million ($.05 per share) in 1996, and $0.3 million ($.03 per share) in 1995.
INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision charged to continuing operations was as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current
Federal........................................ $2,394 $ 6,924 $ 9,618
State.......................................... 866 1,920 2,254
Deferred
Federal........................................ 3,157 940 (1,703)
State.......................................... 406 208 (161)
------ ------- -------
$6,823 $ 9,992 $10,008
====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal statutory tax rate....................... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State taxes, net of federal benefit.............. 5.8 5.8 5.6
Non-deductible goodwill.......................... 7.1 0.6 0.5
Other, net....................................... (.3) 0.5 0.9
------ ------- -------
Effective tax rate............................... 47.6% 41.9% 42.0%
====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
F-12
<PAGE> 75
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The provision (credit) for deferred income taxes from continuing operations is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Receivables allowance............................ $ 630 $ 136 $ (121)
Inventory reserves............................... 742 94 193
Employee benefit accruals........................ 219 148 (530)
Depreciation..................................... 396 429 (221)
Lease commitment provision....................... 870 8 (1,106)
Other............................................ 706 333 (79)
------ ------- -------
$3,563 $ 1,148 $(1,864)
====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
Deferred tax balances were composed of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
------------------
1997 1996
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Receivables allowance................................... $ 1,404 $ 564
Inventory reserves...................................... 3,210 409
Employee benefit accruals............................... 2,600 2,018
Lease commitment provision.............................. 696 1,098
Discontinued operations................................. 1,705 2,305
Other................................................... 665 309
------- -------
10,280 6,703
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation............................................ (675) (357)
------- -------
Net deferred tax balances................................. $ 9,605 $ 6,346
======= =======
</TABLE>
Current deferred income tax benefits, included with prepaid expenses and other,
and noncurrent deferred income tax benefits, included with other assets, were as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
------------------
1997 1996
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Current deferred income tax benefits
Federal................................................. $ 7,936 $ 4,339
State................................................... 506 94
Noncurrent deferred income tax benefits
Federal................................................. 1,036 1,702
State................................................... 127 211
------- -------
$ 9,605 $ 6,346
======= =======
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE> 76
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company has a qualified, trusteed, savings and profit sharing plan for
eligible employees. Employees must contribute at least 1% of their annual
compensation to participate in the plan. The Company's contributions to the
plan, as determined by the Board of Directors, were $.9 million in 1997, $1.1
million in 1996 and $1 million in 1995.
The Company maintains deferred compensation plans, including one plan that
provides for Company matching contributions, for certain directors, officers and
other key employees. Eligible employees who participate in the plans are allowed
to contribute a portion of their compensation, on a pretax basis, which, in the
case of one of its plans, is matched up to 10% of compensation. The deferred
amount and the Company's matching contribution are expensed as earned by the
employee. Expense associated with the deferred compensation element of these
plans was $0.7 million in 1997, $0.6 million in 1996 and $1.1 million in 1995.
The Company provides postretirement medical coverage for qualifying employees
who were employed prior to January 1, 1998. Annual costs and accumulated and
vested benefit obligations relating to postretirement medical benefits were not
significant.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At December 31, 1997 the Company had operating leases on certain of its
facilities and equipment expiring in various years through 2004. Under certain
operating leases, the Company is required to pay property taxes and insurance.
Rent expense pertaining to operating leases was $7.5 million in 1997, $4.7
million in 1996 and $3.9 million in 1995. Amortization of capitalized leases,
which expired in 1997, amounted to $.9 million in 1997, $1.7 million in 1996 and
$1.6 million in 1995.
Minimum annual rentals on operating leases for the five years subsequent to 1997
and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998.................................. $ 8,142
1999.................................. 7,152
2000.................................. 2,673
2001.................................. 1,472
2002.................................. 1,134
Thereafter............................ 707
-------
$21,280
=======
</TABLE>
The Company is involved in litigation incidental to its business. In the opinion
of management, the expected outcome of such litigation will not materially
affect the Company's financial position or results of operations.
SPECIAL ITEMS
In 1995, the Company sold the assets of a division which manufacturers switches,
push-buttons and electroluminescent panels used in commercial aircraft. Total
cash proceeds
F-14
<PAGE> 77
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
were approximately $7.7 million resulting in a gain before income taxes of $3.1
million. Operating results of the division were not material to the Company's
consolidated operating results.
In 1995, the Company agreed to purchase a building to consolidate national
service and computer center operations at a larger facility. The related
decision to sublease the corporate offices for the remaining lease term resulted
in a $2.8 million charge for the net lease commitment.
BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Following the sale of the Graphics Imaging Group, the Company operates in two
business segments: Electronics and Recreational Products. The Electronics Group
includes the distribution of electronic components (semiconductors, passive
components, electromechanical devices, and connectors) and related value-added
services (i.e., EDG). In addition, Electronics Group operations include
microcomputer sales and services, and manufacturing of precision stampings and
certain passive components. The Recreational Products Group distributes after
market products for the recreational vehicle, mobile home, motorcycle,
snowmobile, and marine industries.
Depreciation and amortization, identifiable assets, and capital expenditures by
business segment were as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Depreciation and amortization
Electronics................................. $ 2,784 $ 2,077 $ 2,007
Recreational Products....................... 232 225 215
Corporate................................... 6,180 3,434 3,533
Discontinued operations..................... 804 492 185
-------- -------- --------
$ 10,000 $ 6,228 $ 5,940
======== ======== ========
Identifiable assets
Electronics................................. $326,636 $143,631 $175,278
Recreational Products....................... 18,840 19,064 16,548
Corporate................................... 32,280 27,431 19,503
Discontinued operations..................... 53,477 51,184 22,553
-------- -------- --------
$431,233 $241,310 $233,882
======== ======== ========
Capital expenditures
Electronics................................. $ 7,341 $ 2,756 $ 3,246
Recreational Products....................... 212 467 196
Corporate................................... 8,504 5,271 1,003
Discontinued operations..................... 138 1,079 574
-------- -------- --------
$ 16,195 $ 9,573 $ 5,019
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE> 78
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The net sales and operating income of each of the Company's business segments
are included in the first paragraph of the "Results of Operations" section of
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition" in this Proxy Statement. Sales between product groups are
insignificant. Corporate assets are primarily cash, information technology
equipment and deferred income tax benefits.
During 1996 the Company purchased five graphics distribution businesses for
approximately $10.8 million in cash and the issuance of 153,148 shares of common
stock. The Company purchased two distribution businesses during 1995 for
approximately $3.4 million in cash. Goodwill related to these transactions was
not significant. Operating results for the purchased businesses were not
significant.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Sale of Graphics Imaging Group -- On September 14, 1998, the Company sold
substantially all of the assets of its Graphics Imaging Group ("Graphics"). The
net purchase price is approximately $40 million, subject to post closing
adjustments and is expected to result in a gain on sale. The results of Graphics
have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial
statements. For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, Graphics had
sales of $156.3 million, $117.1 million and $73.4 million, respectively. Income
from the discontinued Graphics operations for these periods has been presented
separately in the accompanying statement of income. The net tangible assets of
Graphics at December 31, 1997 and 1996 were $35.5 million and $31.8 million,
respectively.
Sale of Electronics Distribution Group -- On October 1, 1998, the Company agreed
to sell its Electronics Distribution Group ("EDG"). The purchase price is
approximately $185 million in cash and the assumption of substantially all of
the liabilities of EDG, subject to post closing adjustments. The sale requires
the approval of the Company's shareholders, along with customary regulatory
review and is expected to close in early 1999.
F-16
<PAGE> 79
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTER ENDED
---------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
Net sales................................. $178,284 $173,993 168,895
-------- -------- --------
Cost of products sold..................... 140,200 138,016 136,766
Selling and administrative expense........ 28,648 28,356 26,741
Depreciation and amortization............. 2,413 2,441 2,141
Interest expense.......................... 3,460 3,215 2,992
Business system and corporate resizing
charges................................. 13,800
-------- -------- --------
174,721 172,028 182,440
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes..................... 3,563 1,965 (13,545)
Income tax provision (benefit)............ 1,719 1,024 (4,475)
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing
operations.............................. 1,844 941 (9,070)
Income from discontinued operations, net
of tax.................................. 597 970 330
Gain on sale of discontinued operations,
net of tax.............................. 1,748
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)......................... $ 2,441 $ 1,911 $ (6,992)
======== ======== ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA
BASIC
Income (loss) from continuing
operations............................ $ .20 $ .10 $ (.96)
======== ======== ========
Net income (loss)....................... $ .26 $ .20 $ (.74)
======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares.......... 9,330 9,383 9,442
======== ======== ========
DILUTED
Income (loss) from continuing
operations............................ $ .20 $ .10 $ (.96)
======== ======== ========
Net income (loss)....................... $ .26 $ .20 $ (.74)
======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares.......... 9,446 9,475 9,442
======== ======== ========
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Net sales................................. $180,169 $193,619 $185,735 $174,926
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cost of products sold..................... 138,675 151,113 144,714 136,842
Selling and administrative expense........ 32,042 31,662 29,539 29,915
Depreciation and amortization............. 2,375 2,397 2,177 2,247
Interest expense.......................... 2,681 2,908 3,221 3,499
Integration charge........................ 4,100
-------- -------- -------- --------
179,873 188,080 179,651 172,503
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes and extraordinary loss..... 296 5,539 6,084 2,423
Income tax provision...................... 182 2,657 2,876 1,108
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss...................... 114 2,882 3,208 1,315
Income from discontinued operations, net
of tax.................................. 715 587 600 660
Loss on early retirement of debt, net of
tax..................................... (675)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income................................ $ 154 $ 3,469 $ 3,808 $ 1,975
======== ======== ======== ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA
BASIC
Income from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.................... $ .01 $ .32 $ .35 $ .14
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income.............................. $ .02 $ .38 $ .42 $ .21
======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares.......... 9,069 9,113 9,171 9,274
======== ======== ======== ========
DILUTED
Income from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.................... $ .01 $ .31 $ .34 $ .14
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income.............................. $ .02 $ .37 $ .40 $ .21
======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares.......... 9,388 9,321 9,494 9,515
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-17
<PAGE> 80
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTER ENDED
---------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Net sales................................. $122,273 $133,281 $129,218 $121,290
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cost of products sold..................... 93,248 102,296 99,169 93,163
Selling and administrative expense........ 21,979 21,341 21,147 20,457
Depreciation and amortization............. 1,474 1,387 1,415 1,460
Interest expense.......................... 959 885 952 877
-------- -------- -------- --------
117,660 125,909 122,683 115,957
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes............................ 4,613 7,372 6,535 5,333
Income tax provision...................... 1,930 3,089 2,735 2,238
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations......... 2,683 4,283 3,800 3,095
Income from discontinued operations, net
of tax.................................. 529 305 580 652
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income................................ $ 3,212 $ 4,588 $ 4,380 $ 3,747
======== ======== ======== ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA
BASIC
Income from continuing operations....... $ .31 $ .48 $ .43 $ .35
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income.............................. $ .37 $ .52 $ .49 $ .42
======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares.......... 8,746 8,843 8,867 8,953
======== ======== ======== ========
DILUTED
Income from continuing operations....... $ .30 $ .47 $ .42 $ .34
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income.............................. $ .36 $ .50 $ .48 $ .41
======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares.......... 9,053 9,138 9,051 9,193
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-18
<PAGE> 81
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30
--------------------
1998 1997
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales................................................ $521,172 $559,523
-------- --------
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold.................................. 414,982 434,502
Selling and administrative............................. 83,745 93,255
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 6,995 6,937
Interest expense....................................... 9,667 8,810
Business system and corporate resizing charges......... 13,800
Integration charge..................................... 4,100
-------- --------
529,189 547,604
-------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes and extraordinary loss........................... (8,017) 11,919
Income tax provision (benefit)........................... (1,732) 5,715
-------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss..................................... (6,285) 6,204
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax.......... 1,897 1,902
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax...... 1,748
Loss on early retirement of debt, net of tax............. (675)
-------- --------
Net income (loss)........................................ $ (2,640) $ 7,431
======== ========
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA
BASIC
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.................................. $ (0.67) $ 0.68
Income from discontinued operations.................... 0.20 0.21
Gain on sale of discontinued operations................ .19
Loss on early retirement of debt....................... (0.07)
-------- --------
Net income (loss)...................................... $ (0.28) $ 0.82
======== ========
Weighted average common shares......................... 9,385 9,118
======== ========
DILUTED
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
extraordinary loss.................................. $ (0.67) $ 0.66
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax........ 0.20 0.20
Gain on sale of discontinued operations................ .19
Loss on early retirement of debt, net of tax........... (0.07)
-------- --------
Net income (loss)...................................... $ (0.28) $ 0.79
======== ========
Weighted average common shares......................... 9,385 9,401
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-19
<PAGE> 82
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents......................... $ 4,957 $ 5,377
Accounts receivable, net.......................... 89,033 120,900
Net receivable from sale of Graphics.............. 12,257
Inventories....................................... 131,064 173,801
Prepaid expenses and other........................ 11,052 8,990
-------- --------
Total current assets...................... 248,363 309,068
-------- --------
Properties, net..................................... 35,215 42,079
Goodwill............................................ 67,540 72,758
Other assets........................................ 9,411 7,328
-------- --------
$360,529 $431,233
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................. $ 51,799 $ 67,121
Accrued liabilities and payroll................... 27,315 26,435
Current portion of long-term liabilities.......... 9,375 7,500
-------- --------
Total current liabilities................. 88,489 101,056
-------- --------
Long-term debt...................................... 114,710 172,330
Deferred compensation and other..................... 7,105 6,495
Shareholders' equity
Preferred stock
Authorized -- 1,000,000 shares
Outstanding -- none
Common stock
Authorized -- 35,000,000 shares
Outstanding -- 9,488,306 and 9,326,391
shares....................................... 101,925 100,410
Reinvested earnings............................... 48,300 50,942
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity................ 150,225 151,352
Commitments and contingencies
-------- --------
$360,529 $431,233
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-20
<PAGE> 83
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30
---------------------
1998 1997
-------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)..................................... $ (2,640) $ 7,431
Depreciation and amortization......................... 4,835 4,750
Amortization of intangibles........................... 2,850 2,795
Provision for losses on accounts receivable........... 1,221 1,541
Gain on sale of discontinued operations............... (1,748)
Business system charge................................ 8,000
Integration charge.................................... 4,100
Loss on early retirement of debt...................... 675
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
and discontinued operations........................ 17,722 (22,302)
-------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities....................................... 30,240 (1,010)
-------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations......... 30,148
Purchases of properties............................... (6,596) (12,970)
Purchase of business.................................. (100,404)
-------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities....................................... 23,552 (113,374)
-------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank borrowings (payments), net....................... (55,745) 130,807
Employee stock plans and other........................ 1,533 2,439
Payments on Senior Notes.............................. (24,700)
-------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities....................................... (54,212) 108,546
-------- ---------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents............... (420) (5,838)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period........ 5,377 12,097
-------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.............. $ 4,957 $ 6,259
======== =========
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable................................... $ 6,420 $ (12,969)
Inventories........................................... 20,393 (12,718)
Accounts payable...................................... (2,975) 4,533
Accrued liabilities and other......................... (6,116) (1,148)
-------- ---------
Net change......................................... $ 17,722 $ (22,302)
======== =========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid......................................... $ 9,316 $ 8,524
Income taxes paid..................................... $ -0- $ 3,673
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-21
<PAGE> 84
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial information included herein has been prepared in conformity with
the accounting policies reflected in the consolidated financial statements
prepared for the year ended December 31, 1997.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included.
The operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full year.
PER SHARE DATA
Basic earnings per share data is based upon the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share data is based upon the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common
shares potentially issuable for dilutive securities such as stock options and
warrants. For the nine month period ended September 30, 1998 potentially
dilutive securities were not included in the computation of the weighted average
number of shares, as inclusion of such amounts would be antidilutive.
BUSINESS SYSTEM AND CORPORATE RESIZING CHARGES
During the third quarter of 1998, the Company recorded special pretax charges
totaling $13.8 million. The charges consisted of $8.0 million to write-off the
investment and provide for related commitments for the discontinuance of the use
and development of the SAP business system for continuing operations. (The
Company also wrote-off approximately $3.0 million of SAP business system costs
associated with the Graphics business which were charged to discontinued
operations). Additionally, the Company recorded a special pretax charge of $5.8
million for employee separation and related exit costs associated with a
resizing program for electronics ($3.9 million) and corporate operations ($1.9
million). In association with the resizing, the Company reduced its work force
by approximately 85 employees primarily in management and support positions.
Approximately $4 million relating to the resizing program was paid during the
quarter.
PROPOSED SALE OF ELECTRONICS DISTRIBUTION GROUP
On October 1, 1998, the Company agreed to sell its Electronics Distribution
Group ("EDG"). The purchase price is approximately $185 million in cash and the
assumption of substantially all of the liabilities of EDG, subject to post
closing adjustments. The sale requires the approval of the Company's
shareholders, along with customary regulatory review and is expected to close in
early 1999.
SALE OF GRAPHICS IMAGING GROUP
On September 14, 1998, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its
Graphics Imaging Group ("Graphics"). The net purchase price is approximately $40
million, subject to post closing adjustments and results in a $3 million pre-tax
gain ($1.7 million net of tax). The Company does not anticipate that the post
closing adjustments will have a significant impact on the recorded gain. The
results of Graphics have been classified as discontinued operations in the
accompanying financial statements. For the nine months
F-22
<PAGE> 85
ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, Graphics had sales of $99.6 million and
$118.2 million, respectively. For 1998, sales are included through the date of
sale.
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
For the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and in connection with the sale of
Graphics, non-cash investing activities included the recording of a net
receivable, totaling $12,257 at September 30, 1998, collectible over the 90 day
period following the sale. During the nine months ended September 30, 1997,
non-cash investing and financing activities included the acquisition of a
265,000 square foot electronics distribution center in Ontario, California,
which was financed through the assumption of Adjustable Tender Industrial
Revenue Bonds due in 2015. The distribution center and related bonds were
recorded at their estimated fair market values of $6.2 million.
F-23
<PAGE> 86
(LINCOLN PARTNERS LLC LETTERHEAD)
APPENDIX
December 1, 1998
The Board of Directors
Bell Industries, Inc.
2201 El Segundo Boulevard
El Segundo, California 90245-4608
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to Bell Industries, Inc. ("Bell") of the consideration being paid for
Bell's Electronic Components Distribution business ("EDG") as set forth in the
Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated October 1, 1998 between Bell and Arrow
Electronics, Inc. ("Arrow") (the "Acquisition Agreement"). As more fully
described in the Acquisition Agreement, Bell will sell to Arrow substantially
all of the assets and related liabilities of EDG to Arrow (the "Sale").
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed the Acquisition Agreement and certain
related documents, and held discussions with certain senior officers and other
representatives of Bell concerning the operations and prospects of EDG. We
examined certain available business and financial information relating to EDG as
well as certain financial forecasts and other information and data for EDG which
were provided to us by the management of Bell, including certain strategic
implications and cost reductions anticipated to result from the Sale. We
reviewed the financial terms of the Sale as set forth in the Acquisition
Agreement and certain related documents in relation to, among other things, the
historical and projected earnings and other operating data of EDG and the
financial condition of EDG. We analyzed certain financial, stock market and
other publicly available information relating to the businesses of other
companies whose operations we considered relevant in evaluating EDG. We compared
financial terms of the Sale to the financial terms of certain other merger &
acquisition transactions we deemed relevant. In addition to the foregoing, we
conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered such other
financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate in arriving at
our opinion.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without assuming any
responsibility for independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness
of all financial and other information and data publicly available or furnished
to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us. With respect to financial
forecasts and other information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or
discussed with us by Bell, we have been advised by the management of Bell that
such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Bell as to the future financial performance of EDG. We have not
made or been provided with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets
or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of EDG nor have we made any physical
inspection of the properties or assets of EDG.
<PAGE> 87
(LINCOLN LOGO)
In connection with our engagement, we were not requested to, and we did not,
solicit third party indications of interest in all or part of EDG. We were not
requested to consider, and our opinion does not address, the relative merits of
the Sale as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for
Bell or the effect of any other Sale in which Bell might engage. Our opinion is
necessarily based upon information available to us, and financial, stock market
and other conditions and circumstances existing and disclosed to us, as of the
date hereof.
Lincoln Partners LLC ("Lincoln Partners") is not acting as financial advisor to
Bell in connection with the proposed Sale other than providing this opinion as
to whether the proposed Sale is fair, from a financial point of view, to Bell.
Lincoln Partners has provided investment banking services to Bell unrelated to
the proposed Sale, for which Lincoln Partners has received compensation.
Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided for the
information of the Board of Directors of Bell in its evaluation of the proposed
Sale, and our opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote on the
proposed Sale. Our opinion may not be published or otherwise used or referred
to, nor shall any public reference to Lincoln Partners be made, without our
prior written consent, except in connection with Bell's proxy statement
regarding the Sale.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as investment bankers,
our work as described above and other factors we deemed relevant, we are of the
opinion that, as of the date hereof, the consideration being paid for EDG is
fair, from a financial point of view, to Bell.
Very truly yours
/s/ Lincoln Partners LLC
Lincoln Partners LLC
<PAGE> 88
PROXY PROXY
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
2201 E. EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245-4608
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1999
The undersigned hereby appoints Gordon Graham and Tracy A. Edwards, or
either of them, as Proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and
hereby authorizes each of them to represent and to vote, as designated below,
all the shares of common stock of Bell Industries, Inc. ("Bell") held of record
by the undersigned on December 4, 1998 at the special meeting of shareholders
to be held on January 26, 1999, and at any adjournments and/or postponements
thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner
directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this
proxy will be voted FOR the matters set forth in Item 1.
IMPORTANT -- THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE
(continued on the reverse side)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
<PAGE> 89
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN OVAL IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY. []
[ ]
THE BOARD OF BELL RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ITEM 1.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. Approval of the sale (the "Sale") by Bell Industries, [] [] []
Inc. to Arrow Electronics, Inc. ("Arrow") of Bell's
Electronics Distribution Group pursuant to an Agreement
of Purchase and Sale between Bell and Arrow, dated as
of October 1, 1998, and the transactions and other
agreements (including the Stock Option Agreement)
contemplated thereby.
Please sign exactly as name appears below.
When shares are held by joint tenants, both
should sign. When signing as attorney,
executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such.
If a corporation, please sign in full
corporate name by President or other
authorized officer. If a partnership,
please sign in partnership name by
authorized person. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE
AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY BY USING
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
-------------------------------------------
Signature
-------------------------------------------
Signature (if held jointly)
Dated: _____________________________, 199__
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
