FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000_______________________________
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________________ to _______________________
Commission file number 0-27562______________________________________________
ATLANTIC REALTY TRUST_________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland 13-3849655
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer-
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
747 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
212-702-8561_____________
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No __
---
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
The number of shares of beneficial interest, par value $.01 per share,
outstanding on August 4, 2000 was 3,561,553.
<PAGE>
I N D E X
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains historical information and
forward-looking statements. Statements looking forward in time are included in
this Form 10-Q pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They involve known and unknown risks
and uncertainties that may cause the Trust's actual results in future periods to
be materially different from any future performance suggested herein. In the
context of forward-looking information provided in this Form 10-Q and in other
reports, please refer to the discussion of risk factors detailed in, as well as
the other information contained in, the Trust's Form 10 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 1996 as well as the Trust's
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the past 12 months.
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION PAGE NO.
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation
June 30, 2000 and December 31, 1999....................................1
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation Periods
April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000 and January 1, 2000 through June
30, 2000 and April 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999 and January 1, 1999
through June 30, 1999.................................................2
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................3
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Liquidation Activities................................................6
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.............7
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.....................................................8
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.............................8
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.......................................8
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...................8
Item 5. Other Information.....................................................9
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................................9
Signatures...................................................................10
<PAGE>
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ATLANTIC REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Liquidation Basis of Accounting)
June 30, 2000 December 31, 1999
------------- -----------------
ASSETS
Investment in Real Estate..............$ 37,700,000 $ 37,775,000
Cash and Short Term Investments........ 24,547,180 23,039,132
Other Assets. ...................... 1,100,000 1,012,000
----------- ------------
Total Assets............... 63,347,180 61,826,132
LIABILITIES
Estimated Costs of Liquidation............4,195,128 4,394,443
----------- ------------
Total Liabilities................4,195,128 4,394,443
------------ ------------
Net Assets in Liquidation...............$59,152,052 $57,431,689
=========== ===========
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1
<PAGE>
ATLANTIC REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Liquidation Basis of Accounting)
For the Period For the Period
April 1, 2000 January 1, 2000
to June 30, 2000 to June 30, 2000
---------------- -----------------
Net Assets in Liquidation
Beginning of Period..............$58,829,137 $57,431,689
Adjustments to Reflect
Liquidation Basis of Accounting.. 322,915 1,720,363
----------- ------------
Net Assets in Liquidation
End of Period.............. $59,152,052 $ 59,152,052
=========== ============
For the Period For the Period
April 1, 1999 January 1, 1999
to June 30, 1999 to June 30, 1999
---------------- -----------------
Net Assets in Liquidation
Beginning of Period..............$56,313,419 $56,211,889
Adjustments to Reflect
Liquidation Basis of Accounting......259,423 360,953
----------- ------------
Net Assets in Liquidation
End of Period................ $56,572,842 $ 56,572,842
=========== ============
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2
<PAGE>
ATLANTIC REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies:
Atlantic Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the
"Trust"), was formed on July 27, 1995 for the purpose of liquidating its
interests in real properties, its mortgage loan portfolio and certain other
assets and liabilities which were transferred to the Trust from Ramco-Gershenson
Properties Trust (formerly named RPS Realty Trust) ("RPS") on May 10, 1996 (the
"Spin-Off Transaction"). The Trust had no operations from the date of formation
to the date of the Spin-Off Transaction. The Trust adopted the liquidation basis
of accounting as of the date of the Spin-Off Transaction based on its originally
stated intention to liquidate its assets or merge or combine operations with
another real estate entity within eighteen months from the date of the Spin-Off
Transaction. The Trust intends to conduct its operations with the intent of
meeting the requirements applicable to a real estate investment trust ("REIT")
under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"). As a result, the Trust will have no current or deferred income tax
liabilities.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial
statements, which have not been audited, include all adjustments necessary to
present fairly the results for the interim periods. Such adjustments consists
only of normal recurring accruals.
The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the annual financial statements and notes thereto included in the Trust's annual
report on form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the
year ended December 31, 1999. The results of interim periods may not be
indicative of the results for the entire year.
Liquidation Basis of Accounting
As a result of the Spin-Off Transaction, the Trust has adopted the
liquidation basis of accounting. The liquidation basis of accounting is
appropriate when liquidation appears imminent and the Trust is no longer viewed
as a going concern. Under this method of accounting, assets are stated at their
estimated net realizable values and liabilities are stated at the anticipated
settlement amounts.
The valuations presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Net
Assets in Liquidation represent the estimates at the dates shown, based on
current facts and circumstances, of the estimated net realizable value of the
assets and estimated costs of liquidating the Trust. In determining the net
realizable values of the assets, the Trust considered each asset's ability to
generate future cash flows, offers to purchase received from third parties, if
any, and other general market information. Such information was considered in
conjunction with operating the Trust's plan for disposition of assets. The
estimated costs of liquidation represent the estimated costs of operating the
Trust through its anticapted termination. These costs primarily include payroll,
consulting and related costs, rent, shareholder relations, legal and auditing.
Changes in these costs during the periods presented are reflected in the
adjustments to reflect liquidation basis of accounting. Computations of net
realizable value necessitate the use of certain assumptions and estimates.
Future events, including economic conditions that relate to real estate markets
in general, may differ from those assumed or estimated at the time such
computations are made. Because of inherent uncertainty of valuation when an
3
<PAGE>
entity is in liquidation, the amounts ultimately realized from assets disposed
and costs incurred to settle liabilities may materially differ from amounts
presented.
Pursuant to the terms of the Trust's Amended and Restated Declaration of
Trust, the Trust was to continue for a period of 18 months from the date of the
Spin-Off Transaction, subject to, among certain other things, satisfactory
resolution of the RPS Tax Issues (as such term is defined in footnote 5 below).
Because the RPS Tax Issues have not yet been satisfactorily resolved, the Trust
has continued its business past that date. The Trust cannot currently estimate
the timing of the future satisfactory resolution of the RPS Tax Issues.
Accordingly, the Trust will continue until there is a final determination of
these issues.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Trust and
its subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
2. Investment in Real Estate:
Estimated Net Estimated Net
Property Location Realizable Value 6/30/00(a) Realizable Value 12/31/99(a)
Hylan
Shopping
Center Staten Island,
NY $37,700,000 $37,775,000
--------------
(a) Includes estimated cash flows using a disposition period of 9 months.
Realized value may differ depending on actual disposition results and
time period.
3. Shares Outstanding:
The weighted average number of shares of beneficial interest outstanding
for the periods ending June 30, 2000 and December 31, 1999 was 3,561,553.
4. Cash and Short-Term Investments:
Cash and short-term investments at June 30, 2000 consist primarily of a
Certificate of Deposit at a major New York bank of $24,000,000 bearing interest
at a fixed rate of 5.30%.
5. Income Taxes:
During the third quarter of 1994, RPS held more than 25% of the value of
its gross assets in overnight Treasury Bill reverse repurchase transactions
which the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") may view as non-qualifying assets
for the purposes of satisfying an asset qualification test applicable to REITs,
based on a Revenue Ruling published in 1977 (the "Asset Issue"). RPS requested
that the IRS enter into a closing agreement with RPS that the Asset Issue would
not impact RPS' status as a REIT. The IRS declined such request. In February
1995, the IRS initiated an examination of the 1991-1995 income tax returns of
RPS (the "RPS Audit" and, together with the Asset Issue, the "RPS Tax Issues").
Based on developments in the law which occurred since 1977, RPS' tax counsel at
that time, Battle Fowler LLP, rendered an opinion that RPS' investment in
Treasury Bill repurchase obligations would not adversely affect its REIT status.
However, such opinion is not binding upon the IRS.
4
<PAGE>
In connection with the Spin-Off Transaction, the Trust assumed all tax
liability arising out of the RPS Tax Issues (other than liability that relates
to events occuring or actions taken by RPS following the date of the Spin-Off
Transaction) pursuant to a tax agreement, dated May 10, 1996, by and between RPS
and the Trust. Such agreement provides that RPS (now named Ramco-Gershenson
Properties Trust), under the direction of four trustees, three of whom are also
trustees of the Trust (the "Continuing Trustees") and not the Trust, will
control, conduct and effect the settlement of any tax claims against RPS
relating to the RPS Tax Issues. Accordingly, the Trust does not have any control
as to the timing of the resolution or disposition of any such claims and no
assurance can be given that the resolution or disposition of any such claims
will be on terms or conditions as favorable to the Trust as if they were
resolved or disposed of by the Trust. During the third quarter of 1999, Herbert
Liechtung, one of the Continuing Trustees, resigned as a trustee of both RPS and
the Trust.
RPS and the Trust have also received an opinion from Wolf, Block, Schorr
and Solis-Cohen LLP (the "Special Tax Counsel") that, to the extent there is a
deficiency in RPS' distributions arising out of the IRS examination, and
provided RPS timely makes a deficiency dividend (i.e. declares and pays a
distribution which is permitted to relate back to the year for which each
deficiency was determined to satisfy the requirement that a REIT distribute
ninety-five percent (95%) of its taxable income), the classification of RPS as a
REIT for the taxable years under examination would not be affected.
As of June 30, 2000, the Trust has not been required to perform its
indemnity obligation with respect to the RPS Tax Issues other than with respect
to the payment of legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with the IRS'
ongoing examination. On March 1, 1999, the IRS revenue agent conducting the
examination issued his examination report (the "Revenue Agent's Report") with
respect to the tax issues in the RPS Tax Audit, including the RPS Tax Issues.
The Revenue Agent's Report sets forth a number of positions which the IRS
examining agent has taken with respect to the RPS Tax Issues for the years that
are subject to the RPS Audit, which Special Tax Counsel to the Continuing
Trustees believes are not consistent with applicable law and regulations of the
IRS. One of the positions, the acquisition of assets by RPS that could be viewed
as non-qualifying assets for REIT purposes, has been addressed in the opinion
letter of counsel referred to above. In addition, the IRS revenue agent has
proposed to disallow the deductions for bad debts and certain other items
claimed by RPS in the years under examination. In reaching his conclusion with
respect to the deduction for bad debts, the IRS revenue agent has disregarded
the fact that the values actually obtained for the assets corresponded to the
values used by RPS in determining its bad debt deductions. If all of the
positions taken in the Revenue Agent's Report were to be sustained, RPS, with
funds supplied by the Trust, would have to distribute up to approximately $16.5
million to its shareholders, in accordance with the procedures for deficiency
dividends, in order to preserve its status as a REIT and could, in addition, be
subject to taxes, interest and penalties up to approximately $29 million through
June 30, 2000. The issuance of the Revenue Agent's Report constitutes only the
first step in the IRS administrative process for determining whether there is
any deficiency in RPS' tax liability for the years at issue and any adverse
determination by the IRS revenue agent is subject to administrative appeal with
the IRS and, thereafter, to judicial review. As noted above, the Revenue Agent's
Report sets forth a number of positions which Special Tax Counsel to RPS and the
Trust believe are not consistent with applicable law and regulations of the IRS.
The Trust filed an administrative appeal (the "Protest") challenging the
findings contained in the Revenue Agent's Report. The appellate conferee to whom
the administrative appeal was assigned reviewed the Revenue Agent's Report and
the Protest and, rather than considering the appeal further, has returned the
case to the revenue agent for further factual development. During a meeting with
the Special Tax Counsel to the Continuing Trustees, the appellate conferee
indicated that, even assuming the
5
<PAGE>
assertions in the Revenue Agent's Report
justified the disallowances, he was required to return the case to the revenue
agent because the facts necessary to sustain the assertions in the Report had
not been established to the degree necessary to permit the consideration of the
case on appeal. The revenue agent has requested information in accordance with
the directions of the appellate conferee and, although much of the information
was examined by the agent previously, the Trust has responded to the new
request.
6. Other Assets:
Other assets include the projected income from the Trust's short-term
investments.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Liquidation Activities.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
At June 30, 2000, the Trust owned one retail property (Hylan Plaza Shopping
Center, located in Staten Island, New York) as well as cash and certain other
assets, which include furniture, fixtures and equipment. The Trust does not
intend to make new loans or actively engage in either the mortgage lending or
the property acquisition business.
The Trust's primary objective has been to liquidate its assets in an
eighteen-month period from the date of the Spin-Off Transaction while realizing
the maximum values for such assets; however because the RPS Tax Issues have not
been satisfactorily resolved, the Trust has continued its business beyond such
period. Although the Trust considers its assumptions and estimates as to the
values and timing of such liquidations to be reasonable, the period of time to
liquidate the assets and distribute the proceeds of such assets is subject to
significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies,
many of which are beyond the Trust's control. There can be no assurance that the
net values ultimately realized and costs actually incurred for such assets will
not materially differ from the Trust's estimates.
The Trust believes that cash and cash equivalents on hand, proceeds
generated by the real estate property that it owns and operates (the Hylan
Center) and proceeds from the eventual sale of such property will be sufficient
to support the Trust and meet its obligations. As of June 30, 2000, the Trust
had approximately $24,547,000 in cash and short-term investments.
Inflation
Inflation has been consistently low during the periods presented in the
consolidated financial statements and, as a result, has not had a significant
effect on the operations on the Trust or its investment.
Year 2000 Issue
As of June 30, 2000, the Trust did not discover any Year 2000 or similar
computer problems in its internal systems or with regard to any vendor, tenant
or other third party computer systems. The Trust will continue to assess all of
its internal systems for operational effectiveness and efficiency beyond Year
2000 concerns. In the event that the Trust discovers Year 2000 or similar
computer problems in its internal
6
systems, the Trust will endeavor to resolve these problems by making
modifications to its systems or purchasing new systems on a timely basis.
Results of Operations
As a result of the Trust adopting the liquidation basis of accounting in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of May 10, 1996 and
thus not reporting results of operations thereafter, there is no management
discussion comparing the corresponding periods.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
Not Applicable.
7
<PAGE>
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Trust was held on May 18, 2000
(i) to elect seven trustees to sit on the Board of Trustee's of the Trust (the
"Board") until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified and (ii) to ratify the selection by
the Board of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of the Trust for
the fiscal year commencing January 1, 2000.
On the first proposal, the vote of the Shareholders was as follows:
NOMINEE FOR WITHHELD ABSTAIN
Stephen R. Blank 3,106,180 17,595 --
Edward Blumenfeld 3,106,127 17,648 --
Samuel M. Eisenstat 3,105,985 17,790 --
Edwin J. Glickman 3,105,737 18,038 --
Arthur H. Goldberg 3,106,053 17,722 --
Joel M. Pashcow 3,106,197 17,578 --
William A. Rosoff 3,106,165 17,610 --
On the second proposal, the Shareholders voted to ratify the selection by
the Board of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of the Trust.
There were 3,106,155 votes for, 8,042 against and 9,578 votes abstained.
8
<PAGE>
Item 5. Other Information.
Pursuant to the terms of the Trust's Amended and Restated Declaration of
Trust, the Trust was to continue for a period of 18 months from the date of the
Spin-Off Transaction (which 18-month period ended on November 10, 1997), subject
to, among certain other things, satisfactory resolution of the RPS Tax Issues.
Because the RPS Tax Issues have not yet been satisfactorily resolved, the Trust
has continued its business past that date. The Trust cannot currently estimate
the timing of the future satisfactory resolution of the RPS Tax Issues.
Accordingly, the Trust will continue until there is a final determination of
these issues.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
1. Exhibits: The registrant has filed the following exhibit as a part of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
Exhibit Number Description
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
2. The registrant has not filed any reports on Form 8-K for the three month
period ended June 30, 2000.
9
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ATLANTIC REALTY TRUST
(Registrant)
Date: August 8, 2000 /s/ Joel M. Pashcow
--------------------------------------
Name: Joel M. Pashcow
Title: Chairman and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 8, 2000 /s/ Edwin R. Frankel
------------------------------------
Name: Edwin R. Frankel
Title: Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
10
