TEKTRONIX INC
DEFR14A, 1995-09-06
INSTRUMENTS FOR MEAS & TESTING OF ELECTRICITY & ELEC SIGNALS
Previous: SUN GROWTH VARIABLE ANNUITY FUND INC, N-30D, 1995-09-06
Next: TSI INC /MT/, 10QSB/A, 1995-09-06



Tektronix, Inc. 
Corporate Headquarters 
26600 S.W. Parkway 
P.O. Box 1000, M/S 63-808 
Wilsonville, Oregon  97070-1000 
503 685-4100 
503 685-4104 FAX 


Tektronix Logo 



September 5, 1995 




Caroline M. Kim 
Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. 
7200 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 1001 
Bethesda, MD  20814 

Dear Ms. Kim: 

This letter addresses I.S.S.'s review of Tektronix' proposals to approve
its Non-Employee Directors Stock Compensation Plan and to amend its 1989
Stock Incentive Plan as set forth in the Tektronix Proxy Statement dated
August 3, 1995. I.S.S.'s key reason for recommending shareholders vote
against these proposals is their belief that the total "value transfer" and
resulting dilution potential is above their allowable cap.

Tektronix, Inc. has been and continues to be concerned about any potential
dilution from stock incentive plans. A Stock Repurchase Program was
approved by the Board of Directors in March 1993 to help reduce dilution
from stock incentive plans. To date, a total of 1.66 million common shares
have been repurchased in the open market for the purpose of offsetting
future share issuance's from the exercise of options under the stock
incentive plans.

The I.S.S. dilution potential assumes that all shares reserved for issuance
under the stock incentive plans, including the Non-Employee Directors plan,
will be granted as stock awards rather than options. During the period from
May 26, 1991 through July 24, 1995 82% of the Tektronix stock incentives
granted were options granted at prices at or above fair market value. Of
the remaining 18%, performance based stock awards compromised 12% and only
6% were time based stock awards, used
<PAGE>2
primarily for recruiting, with half of these awards vesting over a three
year or more period of time.

Going forward we intend to grant stock incentives in a similar manner and
don't expect that the proportion of shares used for stock awards is likely
to increase significantly. Thus, based upon our history and future
expectations, we believe that I.S.S.'s dilution conclusion differs
significantly from our past actions and future intentions.

As reflected in our Proxy Statement, on page 20, the number of stock
options issued by Tektronix benchmarks well against a comparative list of
companies. With respect to the Non-Employee Directors plan we feel we are
a leader in compensating our Directors with stock, consistent with the
current directions in corporate governance.

Sincerely, 

JEROME J.MEYER

Jerome J. Meyer 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission