TCI COMMUNICATIONS INC
10-Q/A, 1994-12-07
CABLE & OTHER PAY TELEVISION SERVICES
Previous: SUN CITY INDUSTRIES INC, 10-Q/A, 1994-12-07
Next: UNION PACIFIC CORP, DEFA14A, 1994-12-07



<PAGE>   1


                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                           WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

                                F O R M 10-Q/A
   
                              (Amendment No. 2)
    

( X )    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
         For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1994

                                       OR

(   )    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
         For the transition period from _____ to _____


Commission File Numbers 0-20421 and 0-5550


                           TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                      and
                           TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                    
           ----------------------------------------------------------
           (Exact name of Registrants as specified in their charters)


<TABLE>
<S>                                                              <C>
             State of Delaware                                         84-1260157 and 84-0588868     
- ------------------------------------------                       -------------------------------------
     (State or other jurisdiction of                             (I.R.S. Employer Identification Nos.)
      incorporation or organization)


              5619 DTC Parkway
            Englewood, Colorado                                                      80111       
- -------------------------------------------                                     ----------------
 (Address of principal executive offices)                                          (Zip Code)
</TABLE>


       Registrants' telephone number, including area code: (303) 267-5500



         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  X     No 
                                                  ---       ---


         The number of shares outstanding of Tele-Communications, Inc.'s common
stock (net of shares held in treasury), as of October 31, 1994, was:

                 Class A common stock - 485,117,335 shares; and
                   Class B common stock - 85,976,717 shares.
<PAGE>   2
                                  SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                    TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                      (Registrant)



Date: December 7, 1994              By: /s/ Stephen M. Brett
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Stephen M. Brett
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                            Secretary


                                    TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                    (Registrant)



                                    By: /s/ Stephen M. Brett
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Stephen M. Brett
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                            General Counsel
<PAGE>   3
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


Management's Discussion and Analysis of
 Financial Condition and Results of Operations


(1)     Material changes in financial condition:

        On August 4, 1994, TCIC and Liberty consummated the Mergers. The
        transaction was structured as a tax free exchange of Class A and Class
        B shares of both companies and preferred stock of Liberty for like
        shares of TCI. TCIC shareholders received one share of TCI for each of
        their shares. Liberty common shareholders received 0.975 of a share of
        TCI for each of their common shares. TCI has not assumed any of TCIC's
        or Liberty's indebtedness or other obligations that were outstanding at
        the time the Mergers were consummated. The Mergers were accounted for
        using predecessor cost due to related party considerations.

        On August 5, 1994, Liberty, Comcast and QVC announced that they had
        entered into the QVC Merger Agreement pursuant to which Comcast and
        Liberty would acquire QVC. In accordance with the QVC Merger Agreement,
        Comcast and Liberty commenced a tender offer for all shares of stock of
        QVC at a net cash price of $46 per share of QVC common stock and a net
        cash price of $460 per share of QVC preferred stock.  Following
        expiration of the tender offer, a corporation controlled by both
        Comcast and Liberty will merge with QVC and any remaining shares of QVC
        will be converted into cash at the same price as offered in the tender
        offer.

        The total cost of the acquisition of the QVC stock not currently owned
        by Comcast or Liberty will be approximately $1.42 billion.  Comcast and
        Liberty have agreed to fund approximately $267 million and $20 million,
        respectively, of the acquisition with the balance expected to be
        provided through debt financing which, after the merger, will be an
        obligation of QVC. The transaction is conditioned upon Comcast and
        Liberty obtaining the requisite financing on satisfactory terms to
        purchase all of the outstanding shares of QVC, upon receipt of certain
        governmental approvals and other customary conditions. Liberty expects
        that the funds required to make Liberty's $20 million cash contribution
        will come from a combination of working capital and general corporate
        funds and existing credit facilities of Liberty and/or TCIC.

        As of August 8, 1994, TCI, TCIC and TeleCable entered into a merger
        agreement, whereby TeleCable will be merged with and into TCIC. The
        aggregate purchase price of $1.6 billion will be paid with shares of
        TCI Class A common stock (currently estimated to be approximately 42
        million shares), assumption of liabilities amounting to approximately
        $300 million and 1 million shares of a new TCI convertible preferred
        stock with an aggregate initial liquidation value of $300 million. Such
        preferred stock shall accrue dividends at 5-1/2% per annum, shall be
        convertible at the option of its holders into 10 million shares of TCI
        Class A common stock and shall be redeemable by TCI after 5 years or
        the holder can cause TCI to redeem after 10 years. The merger requires
        the approval of the shareholders of TeleCable and various franchise and
        other governmental authorities.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-28

<PAGE>   4
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        Subsequent to September 30, 1994, subsidiaries of the Company, Comcast,
        Cox and Sprint formed WirelessCo to engage in the business of providing
        wireless communications services on a nationwide basis. Through
        WirelessCo, the partners intend to bid for PCS licenses in PCS Auctions
        to be conducted by the FCC. WirelessCo has applied for eligibility to
        bid for licenses in 39 of the 51 MTAs for which PCS licenses will be
        auctioned by the FCC commencing in December 1994. WirelessCo may also
        invest in, affiliate with or acquire licenses from successful bidders
        in the PCS Auctions. The Company owns a 30% interest in WirelessCo.
        Subsidiaries of Cox, Sprint and the Company have also formed a separate
        partnership, in which the Company owns a 35.3% interest, to bid for PCS
        licenses for the Philadelphia MTA.  The Company cannot predict the cost
        of obtaining licenses in the PCS Auctions or the likelihood that
        WirelessCo and the Philadelphia partnership will be successful bidders
        for any of the PCS licenses for which they have applied to bid. If the
        respective bidding strategies of WirelessCo and the Philadelphia
        partnership are successful, however, the capital required to fund the
        license costs and the construction of the PCS systems will be
        substantial and the Company's share thereof would represent a material
        increase in its capital requirements. The Company anticipates that it
        would finance its share of the required capital through borrowings
        under existing new credit facilities, although there can be no
        assurance that additional financing would be available on terms desired
        by the Company.

        The Cable Partners and Sprint have also agreed upon the basis upon
        which they would negotiate a definitive agreement for the formation of
        NewTelco to engage in the business of providing local wireline
        communications services to residences and businesses on a nationwide
        basis, using cable television facilities of the Cable Partners and
        other cable television operators that agree to affiliate with NewTelco.
        The parties intend that the Cable Partners would contribute their
        interests in TCG and its affiliated entities and other competitive
        access businesses to NewTelco. The Company currently owns an
        approximately 29.9% interest in TCG and would own a 30% interest in
        NewTelco. The modification or repeal of existing regulatory and
        legislative barriers to competition in the local telephony market will
        be necessary in order for NewTelco to provide its proposed services in
        most states. Formation of NewTelco is subject to certain conditions
        including the negotiation of a definitive partnership agreement and
        contribution agreement. The contributions of TCG and other competitive
        access businesses to NewTelco will be subject, among other things, to
        the receipt of necessary regulatory and other consents and approvals.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-29

<PAGE>   5
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        The Company is a holding company and its assets consist solely of
        investments in its subsidiaries. The Company's rights, and therefore
        the extent to which the holders of the Company's Preferred Stocks will
        be able to participate in the distribution of assets of any subsidiary
        upon the latter's liquidation or reorganization, will be subject to
        prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors, including trade creditors,
        except to the extent that the Company may itself be a creditor with
        recognized claims against such subsidiary (in which case the claims of
        the Company would still be subject to the prior claims of any secured
        creditor of such subsidiary and of any holder of indebtedness of such
        subsidiary that is senior to that held by the Company).

        The Company's ability to pay dividends on any classes or series of
        Preferred Stock is dependent upon the ability of the Company's
        subsidiaries to distribute amounts to the Company in the form of
        dividends, loans or advances or in the form of repayment of loans and
        advances from the Company. The subsidiaries are separate and distinct
        legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay
        the dividends on any class or series of preferred stock or to make any
        funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans or their
        payments. The payment of dividends, loans or advances to the Company by
        its subsidiaries may be subject to statutory or regulatory
        restrictions, is contingent upon the cash flows generated by those
        subsidiaries and is subject to various business considerations.
        Further, certain of the Company's subsidiaries are subject to loan
        agreements that prohibit or limit the transfer of funds by such
        subsidiaries to the Company in the form of dividends, loans, or
        advances and require that such subsidiaries' indebtedness to the
        Company be subordinate to the indebtedness under such loan agreements.
        The Company's subsidiaries currently have the ability to transfer funds
        to the Company in amounts exceeding the Company's dividend requirement
        on any class or series of preferred stock. The amount of net assets of
        subsidiaries subject to such restrictions exceeds the Company's
        consolidated net assets.

        The Company's subsidiaries generally finance acquisitions and capital
        expenditures through net cash provided by operating and financing
        activities. Although amounts expended for acquisitions and capital
        expenditures exceed net cash provided by operating activities, the
        borrowing capacity resulting from such acquisitions, construction and
        internal growth has been and is expected to continue to be adequate to
        fund the shortfall. See the Company's consolidated statements of cash
        flows included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

        Subsidiaries of the Company had approximately $1.9 billion in unused
        lines of credit at September 30, 1994, excluding amounts related to
        lines of credit which provide availability to support commercial paper.
        Although such subsidiaries of the Company were in compliance with the
        restrictive covenants contained in their credit facilities at said
        date, additional borrowings under the credit facilities are subject to
        the subsidiaries' continuing compliance with the restrictive covenants
        (which relate primarily to the maintenance of certain ratios of cash
        flow to total debt and cash flow to debt service, as defined in the
        credit facilities) after giving effect to such additional borrowings.
        TCI has not assumed any of TCIC's or Liberty's indebtedness or other
        obligations that were outstanding at the time the Mergers were
        consummated. See note 8 to the accompanying consolidated financial
        statements for additional information regarding the material terms of
        the subsidiaries' lines of credit.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-30

<PAGE>   6
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

   
        One measure of liquidity is commonly referred to as "interest 
        coverage". Interest coverage, which is measured by the ratio of
        Operating Cash Flow (operating income before depreciation, amortization
        and other noncash credits or charges) ($1,339 million and $1,409
        million for the nine months ended September 30, 1994 and 1993,
        respectively) to interest expense ($568 million and $549 million for
        the nine months ended September 30, 1994 and 1993, respectively), is
        determined by reference to the consolidated statements of operations.
        The Company's interest coverage ratio was 236% and 257% for the nine
        months ended September 30, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Management of
        the Company believes that the foregoing interest coverage ratio is
        adequate in light of the consistent and nonseasonal nature of its cable
        television operations and the relative predictability of the Company's
        interest expense, more than half of which results from fixed rate
        indebtedness. Operating Cash Flow is a measure of value and borrowing
        capacity within the cable television industry and is not intended to be 
        a substitute for cash flows provided by operating activities, a measure
        of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted 
        accounting principles, and should not be relied upon as such.
    

        In July 1994, Rainbow purchased a 49.9% general partnership interest in
        AMC from Liberty under the terms of a buy/sell provision contained in
        the AMC partnership agreement for total cash proceeds of $180 million.
        Liberty used a portion of these proceeds to repay debt to TCI totaling
        $105 million of principal plus $7 million of accrued interest.

        The Company's various partnerships and other affiliates accounted for
        under the equity method generally fund their acquisitions, required
        debt repayments and capital expenditures through borrowings under and
        refinancing of their own credit facilities (which are generally not
        guaranteed by the Company) and through net cash provided by their own
        operating activities.

        Approximately thirty-five percent of the franchises held by TCIC,
        involving approximately 3.8 million basic subscribers, expire
        within five years. There can be no assurance that the franchises for
        TCIC's systems will be renewed as they expire although TCIC
        believes that its cable television systems generally have been
        operated in a manner which satisfies the standards established by the
        Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended (the "1984 Cable
        Act") for franchise renewal. However, in the event they are renewed,
        TCIC cannot predict the impact of any new or different conditions 
        that might be imposed by the franchising authorities in connection 
        with such renewals. To date, they have not varied significantly from
        the original terms.
        
        The Company is obligated to pay fees for the license to exhibit certain
        qualifying films that are released theatrically by various motion
        picture studios from January 1, 1993 through December 31, 2002. The
        aggregate minimum liability under certain of the license agreements is
        approximately $368 million. The aggregate amount of the Film License
        Obligations under other license agreements is not currently estimable
        because such amount is dependent upon the number of qualifying films
        produced by the motion picture studios, the amount of United States
        theatrical film rentals for such qualifying films, and certain other
        factors. Nevertheless, the Company's aggregate payments under the Film
        License Obligations could prove to be significant.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-31

<PAGE>   7
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        The Company is upgrading and installing optical fiber in its cable
        systems at a rate such that in three years TCIC anticipates that it will
        be serving the majority of its customers with state-of-the-art fiber
        optic cable systems. Through September 30, 1994, TCIC's capital 
        expenditures amounted to $944 million. However, the Company is 
        continually reevaluating its capital expenditures and such expenditures
        are subject to change based upon the effects to the Company's liquidity
        arising from rate regulation.

        The Company competes with operators of alternative methods of
        distribution of the same or similar video programming as that offered
        by its cable systems. Technologies competitive with cable television
        have been encouraged by Congress and the FCC to offer services in
        direct competition with existing cable systems. One such competitor is
        direct broadcast satellite ("DBS"). DBS services are offered directly
        to subscribers owning home satellite dishes that vary in size depending
        upon the power of the satellite; one DBS operator recently began
        offering nationwide video services that can be received by a satellite
        that measures approximately eighteen inches in diameter. DBS operators
        can acquire the right to distribute over satellite all of the
        significant cable television programming currently available on the
        Company's cable systems. As the cost declines of equipment needed to 
        receive these transmissions, it is expected that the Company will 
        experience increased and substantial competition from DBS operators. The
        1984 Cable Act, the regulations of the FCC and the Modification of
        Final Judgment entered in United States v. AT&T currently prohibit
        Regional Bell operating companies from providing video programming and
        other information services directly to subscribers in their telephone
        service areas (except in limited circumstances in rural areas). In
        separate decisions, four United States District Courts have held that
        the cross-entry prohibition in the 1984 Cable Act is unconstitutional
        as a violation of the telephone companies First Amendment right to free
        expression. All four decisions have been appealed (or are expected to
        be appealed). If the current cross-entry restrictions are removed to
        relaxed, the Company could face increased competition from telephone
        companies which, in most cases, have greater financial resources than
        the Company.
        
        The FCC has authorized the provision of so-called "video-dialtone"
        services by which independent video programmers may deliver services to
        the home over telephone-provided circuits, thereby by-passing the local
        cable system or other video providers. Although local exchange
        telephone carriers, providing "video-dialtone" under the existing rules
        are allowed only a limited financial interest in programming services
        and must limit their role largely to that of a traditional "common
        carrier," the current status of these rules is uncertain under the
        court decisions referred to above. Numerous local exchange telephone
        carriers have filed applications with the FCC for authorization to
        construct video-dialtone systems and to provide such services. This
        alternative means of distribution of video services to consumer's
        homes, could eventually become a substantial competitor to the
        Company's cable and other video delivery systems.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-32

<PAGE>   8
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        Management believes that net cash provided by operating activities, the
        ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to obtain additional
        financing (including the subsidiaries available lines of credit and
        access to public debt markets) and proceeds from disposition of assets
        will provide adequate sources of short-term and long-term liquidity in
        the future.

(2)     Material changes in results of operations:

        On October 5, 1992, Congress enacted the 1992 Cable Act. In 1993 and
        1994, the FCC adopted certain rate regulations required by the 1992
        Cable Act and imposed a moratorium on certain rate increases. As a
        result of such actions, the Company's Regulated Services are subject to
        the jurisdiction of local franchising authorities and the FCC. 

        Based on its analysis and interpretation of the FCC's 1993 and 1994
        rate regulations, the Company estimates that the implementation of such
        regulations will result in an aggregate annualized reduction of revenue
        and operating income ranging from $280 million to $300 million. The
        estimated annualized reduction in revenue assumes that the FCC will not
        require further reductions beyond the current regulations and is prior
        to any possible mitigating factors (none of which is assured) such as
        (i) the provision of alternate service offerings (ii) the
        implementation of rate adjustments to non-regulated services and (iii)
        the utilization of cost-of-service methodologies, as described below.

        Subject to certain limitations, the FCC's rate regulations generally
        permit cable operators to adjust rates to account for inflation and
        increases in certain external costs, including increases in programming
        costs and compulsory copyright fees and any increase in the number of
        regulated channels. 


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-33

<PAGE>   9
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(2)     Material changes in results of operations (continued):

        Cable operators may justify rates higher than the benchmark
        rates established by the FCC through demonstrating unusually high costs
        based upon a cost-of-service showing. Under this methodology, cable
        operators may be allowed to recover through the rates they charge for
        Regulated Services, their normal operating expenses plus an interim
        rate of return of 11.25%, which rate may be subject to change in the
        future. 

        The Company believes that it has complied, in all material respects,
        with the provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, including its rate setting
        provisions. However, the Company's rates for Regulated Services are
        subject to adjustment upon review, as described above. If, as a result
        of the review process, a system cannot substantiate its rates, it could
        be required to retroactively reduce its rates to the appropriate
        benchmark and refund the excess portion of rates received. Any refunds
        of the excess portion of tier service rates would be retroactive to the
        date of complaint. Any refunds of the excess portion of all other
        Regulated Service rates would be retroactive to the later of September
        1, 1993, or one year prior to the certification date of the applicable
        franchise authority. The amount of refunds, if any, which could be
        payable by the Company in the event that any system's rates were to be
        successfully challenged, is not considered to be material.

        Based on the foregoing, the Company believes that the 1993 and 1994
        rate regulations have had a material effect on its results of 
        operations.

        The "must carry" provisions mandate that cable companies within a
        broadcast television station's reach, retransmit its signal. On July 2,
        1993, the FCC voted to extend "must carry" rules to broadcast
        television stations with shop-at-home formats. "Must carry"
        requirements went into effect on October 6, 1993, and  HSN, a
        consolidated subsidiary of Liberty, experienced growth in carriage as a
        result. The new law was challenged in the courts, and on June 27, 1994,
        the United States Supreme Court in Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v.
        F.C.C. vacated the Federal District Court's decision upholding the law
        as constitutional because genuine issues of material fact remained
        unresolved. The "must carry" statute and regulations remain in place
        pending the outcome of further proceedings before the Federal District
        Court. If "must carry" ultimately is ruled unconstitutional, a portion
        of this growth in cable carriage may be reversed and HSN's revenues may
        be adversely effected.
        

                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-34

<PAGE>   10
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(2)     Material changes in results of operations (continued):

        Revenue increased by approximately 10% for the nine months ended 
        September 30, 1994 compared to the corresponding period of 1993. Such 
        increase was the result of the Mergers (7%), the growth in subscriber 
        levels within the Company's cable television systems (4%), the effect
        of certain acquisitions (2%) and certain new services (1%), net of a
        decrease in revenue (4%) due to rate reductions required by rate
        regulation implemented pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act. In the third
        quarter of 1994, the Company experienced a decrease in the price
        charged for those services that are subject to rate regulation under
        the 1992 Cable Act.

        Operating costs and expenses increased by 18% for the nine months ended
        September 30, 1994 compared to the corresponding period of 1993. The
        consolidation of Liberty in the Mergers resulted in an increase
        of $205 million in operating, selling, general and administrative
        expenses. Due to the aforementioned program to upgrade and install
        optical fiber in its cable systems, the Company's capital expenditures
        and depreciation expense have increased. Additionally, the Company
        incurred $30 million of programming and marketing costs associated with
        the launch in 1994 of a new premium programming service to its
        subscribers. The Company cannot determine whether and to what extent
        increases in the cost of programming will effect its operating costs.
        Additionally, the Company cannot predict how these increases in the
        cost of programming will affect its revenue but intends to recover
        additional costs to the extent allowed by the aforementioned FCC rate
        regulations. The Company recorded an adjustment of $8 million in 1994
        to reduce its liability for compensation relating to stock appreciation
        rights resulting from a decline in the market price of the Company's
        Class A common stock.

   
        The Company is a shareholder of TeleWest Communications plc (formerly  
        TCI/US West Cable Communications Group) ("TeleWest UK"), a company that
        is currently operating and constructing cable television and telephone
        systems in the United Kingdom ("UK"). TeleWest UK, which is accounted 
        for under the equity method, had a carrying value at September 30, 1994
        of $296 million and accounted for $32 million and $17 million of the 
        Company's share of its affiliates' losses in 1994 and 1993, 
        respectively. In February 1994, the Company acquired a consolidated 
        investment in Flextech plc ("Flextech"), a programming and video 
        distribution company located in the UK. Flextech accounted for 
        $135 million of the Company's total assets and $65 million of the
        Company's equity investments at September 30, 1994 and has generated
        losses in 1994 of $18 million (before deducting the minority interests'
        40% share of such losses). In addition, the Company has other less
        significant investments in video distribution and programming
        businesses located in the UK, other parts of Europe, Asia and certain
        other foreign countries. In the aggregate, such other investments had a
        carrying value of $46 million at September 30, 1994 and accounted for
        $14 million of the Company's share of its affiliates' losses in 1994.
    

       
        In connection with its investments in the above-described foreign 
        entities, the Company is exposed to the risk that unfavorable and 
        potentially volatile fluctuations in exchange rates with respect to the
        UK pound and other foreign currencies will cause the Company to 
        experience unrealized foreign currency translation losses. To a much 
        lesser extent, the Company is exposed to the risk that unfavorable and
        potentially volatile foreign currency fluctuations will cause the
        Company to experience realized and unrealized losses with respect to
        transactions denominated in currencies other than the respective
        functional currencies of the Company and its various foreign affiliates.
        Because the Company views its foreign assets as long-term investments,
        the Company generally does not hedge its exposure to short-term
        movements in foreign currencies. Due to the difficulty in accurately
        predicting the timing and amount of future cash inflows and outflows
        associated with the Company's foreign investments, the Company
        presently does not believe that it is prudent to hedge its exposure to
        currency risk on a long-term basis. 
    

        The Company's net earnings (before preferred stock dividends)of $25
        million for the three months ended September 30, 1994 represented an
        increase of $90 million as compared to the Company's net loss (before
        preferred stock dividends) of $65 million for the corresponding period
        of 1993. Such increase is principally the result of the effect of
        improved share of earnings from Liberty prior to the Mergers
        (principally resulting from the gain recognized by Liberty upon the
        sale of its investment in AMC) and the reduction in income tax expense
        (principally resulting from the required recognition in the third 
        quarter of 1993 of the cumulative effect of the change in the Federal
        income tax rate from 34% to 35%), net of the effect of the 
        aforementioned reduction in rates charged for Regulated Services.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-35

<PAGE>   11
                   TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     (formerly TCI/Liberty Holding Company)


(2)     Material changes in results of operations (continued):

        The Company's net earnings (before preferred stock dividends) of $63
        million for the nine months ended September 30, 1994 represented an
        increase of $49 million as compared to the Company's net earnings
        (before preferred stock dividends) of $14 million for the corresponding
        period of 1993. Such increase is principally the result of the
        aforementioned increase in share of earnings of Liberty prior to the
        Mergers, the decrease in income tax expense, net of the aforementioned
        reduction in rates charged for Regulated Services and the decrease in
        gain on disposition of assets.





                                      I-36

<PAGE>   12
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)


Management's Discussion and Analysis of
 Financial Condition and Results of Operations


(1)     Material changes in financial condition:

        On August 4, 1994, TCIC and Liberty consummated the Mergers. The
        transaction was structured as a tax free exchange of Class A and Class
        B shares of both companies and preferred stock of Liberty for like
        shares of TCI. TCIC shareholders received one share of TCI for each of
        their shares. Liberty common shareholders received 0.975 of a share of
        TCI for each of their common shares. TCI has not assumed any of TCIC's
        indebtedness or other obligations that were outstanding at the time the
        Mergers were consummated.

        As of August 8, 1994, TCI, TCIC and TeleCable entered into a merger
        agreement, whereby TeleCable will be merged into TCIC. The aggregate
        purchase price of $1.6 billion will be paid with shares of TCI Class A
        common stock (currently estimated to be approximately 42 million
        shares), assumption of liabilities amounting to approximately $300
        million and 1 million shares of a new TCI convertible preferred stock
        with an aggregate initial liquidation value of $300 million. Such
        preferred stock shall accrue dividends at 5-1/2% per annum, shall be
        convertible at the option of its holders into 10 million shares of TCI
        Class A common stock and shall be redeemable by TCI after 5 years or
        the holder can cause TCI to redeem after 10 years. The merger requires
        the approval of the shareholders of TeleCable and various franchise and
        government authorities.

         Subsequent to September 30, 1994, subsidiaries of TCI, Comcast, Cox 
         and Sprint formed WirelessCo to engage in the business of providing 
         wireless communications services on a nationwide basis.  Through 
         WirelessCo, the partners intend to bid for PCS licenses in PCS 
         Auctions to be conducted by the FCC. WirelessCo has applied for
         eligibility to bid for licenses in 39 of the 51 MTAs for which PCS
         licenses will be auctioned by the FCC commencing in December 1994.
         WirelessCo may also invest in, affiliate with or acquire licenses from
         successful bidders in the PCS Auctions. The Company owns a 30%
         interest in WirelessCo. Subsidiaries of Cox, Sprint and the Company
         have also formed a separate partnership, in which the Company owns a
         35.3% interest, to bid for PCS licenses for the Philadelphia MTA.  The
         Company cannot predict the cost of obtaining licenses in the PCS
         Auctions or the likelihood that WirelessCo and the Philadelphia
         partnership will be successful bidders for any of the PCS licenses for
         which they have applied to bid. If the respective bidding strategies
         of WirelessCo and the Philadelphia partnership are successful,
         however, the capital required to fund the license costs and the
         construction of the PCS systems will be substantial and the Company's
         share thereof would represent a material increase in its capital
         requirements. The Company anticipates that it would finance its share
         of the required capital through borrowings under existing and new
         credit facilities, although there can be no assurance that additional
         financing would be available on terms desired by the Company.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-54
<PAGE>   13
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        The Cable Partners and Sprint have also agreed upon the basis upon
        which they would negotiate a definitive agreement for the formation of
        NewTelco to engage in the business of providing local wireline
        communications services to residences and businesses on a nationwide
        basis, using cable television facilities of the Cable Partners and
        other cable television operators that agree to affiliate with NewTelco.
        The parties intend that the Cable Partners would contribute their
        interests in TCG and its affiliated entities and other competitive
        access businesses to NewTelco. The Company currently owns an
        approximately 29.9% interest in TCG and would own a 30% interest in
        NewTelco. The modification or repeal of existing regulatory and
        legislative barriers to competition in the local telephony market will
        be necessary in order for NewTelco to provide its proposed services in
        most states. Formation of NewTelco is subject to certain conditions
        including the negotiation of a definitive partnership agreement and
        contribution agreement. The contributions of TCG and other competitive
        access businesses to NewTelco will be subject, among other things, to
        the receipt of necessary regulatory and other consents and approvals.

        TCIC generally finances acquisitions and capital expenditures through
        net cash provided by operating and financing activities. Although
        amounts expended for acquisitions and capital expenditures exceed net
        cash provided by operating activities, the borrowing capacity resulting
        from such acquisitions, construction and internal growth has been and
        is expected to continue to be adequate to fund the shortfall. See
        TCIC's consolidated statements of cash flows included in the
        accompanying consolidated financial statements.

        TCIC had approximately $1.8 billion in unused lines of credit at
        September 30, 1994, excluding amounts related to lines of credit which
        provide availability to support commercial paper. Although TCIC was in
        compliance with the restrictive covenants contained in its credit
        facilities at said date, additional borrowings under the credit
        facilities are subject to TCIC's continuing compliance with the
        restrictive covenants (which relate primarily to the maintenance of
        certain ratios of cash flow to total debt and cash flow to debt
        service, as defined in the credit facilities) after giving effect to
        such additional borrowings. See note 7 to the accompanying consolidated
        financial statements for additional information regarding the material
        terms of TCIC's lines of credit.

   
        One measure of liquidity is commonly referred to as "interest 
        coverage". Interest coverage, which is measured by the ratio of
        Operating Cash Flow (operating income before depreciation, amortization
        and other noncash credits or charges) ($1,325 million and $1,409 million
        for the nine months ended September 30, 1994 and 1993, respectively) to
        interest expense ($566 million and $549 million for the nine months
        ended September 30, 1994 and 1993, respectively), is determined by
        reference to the consolidated statements of operations. TCIC's interest
        coverage ratio was 234% and 257% for the nine months ended September
        30, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Management of TCIC believes that the
        foregoing interest coverage ratio is adequate in light of the
        consistent and nonseasonal nature of its cable television operations
        and the relative predictability of TCIC's interest expense, more than
        half of which results from fixed rate indebtedness. Operating Cash Flow
        is a measure of value and borrowing capacity within the cable
        television industry and is not intended to be a substitute for cash
        flows provided by operating activities, a measure of performance 
        prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, 
        and should not be relied upon as such.
    

                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-55
<PAGE>   14
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        In July 1994, Rainbow purchased a 49.9% general partnership interest in
        AMC from Liberty under the terms of a buy/sell provision contained in
        the AMC partnership agreement for total cash proceeds of $180 million.
        Liberty used a portion of these proceeds to repay debt to TCIC totaling
        $192 million of principal plus $7 million of accrued interest.

        TCIC's various partnerships and other affiliates accounted for under
        the equity method generally fund their acquisitions, required debt
        repayments and capital expenditures through borrowings under and
        refinancing of their own credit facilities (which are generally not
        guaranteed by TCIC) and through net cash provided by their own
        operating activities.

        Certain subsidiaries' loan agreements contain restrictions regarding
        transfers of funds to the parent company in the form of loans, advances
        or cash dividends. The amount of net assets of such subsidiaries
        exceeds TCIC's consolidated net assets. However, net cash provided by
        operating activities of other subsidiaries which are not restricted
        from making transfers to the parent company have been and are expected
        to continue to be sufficient to enable the parent company to meet its
        cash obligations.

        Approximately thirty-five percent of the franchises held by TCIC,
        involving approximately 3.8 million basic subscribers, expire within
        five years. There can be no assurance that the franchises for TCIC's
        systems will be renewed as they expire although TCIC believes that its
        cable television systems generally have been operated in a manner which
        satisfies the standards established by the 1984 Cable Act for franchise
        renewal. However, in the event they are renewed, TCIC cannot predict 
        the impact of any new or different conditions that might be imposed by 
        the franchising authorities in connection with such renewals. To date,
        they have not varied significantly from the original terms.

        TCIC competes with operators of alternative methods of distribution
        of the same or similar video programming as that offered by its
        cable systems. Technologies competitive with cable television
        have been encouraged by Congress and the FCC to offer services in
        direct competition with existing cable systems. One such competitor is
        DBS. DBS services are offered directly to subscribers owning home
        satellite dishes that vary in size depending upon the power of the
        satellite; one DBS operator recently began offering nationwide video
        services that can be received by a satellite that measures
        approximately eighteen inches in diameter. DBS operators can acquire
        the right to distribute over satellite all of the significant cable
        television programming currently available on TCIC's cable systems. As 
        the cost declines of equipment needed to receive these transmissions,
        it is expected that TCIC will experience increased and substantial
        competition from DBS operators. The 1984 Cable Act, the regulations of
        the FCC and the Modifications of Final Judgment entered in United
        States v. AT&T currently prohibit Regional Bell operating companies
        from providing video programming and other information services
        directly to subscribers in their telephone service areas (except in
        limited circumstances in rural areas). In separate decisions, four
        United States District Courts have held that the cross-entry
        prohibition in the 1984 Cable Act is unconstitutional as a violation
        of the telephone companies First Amendment right to free expression.
        All four decisions have been appealed (or are expected to be
        appealed). If the current cross-entry restrictions are removed or
        relaxed, TCIC could face increased competition from telephone
        companies which, in most cases, have greater financial resources than
        TCIC.


                                                                     (continued)




                                     I-56
<PAGE>   15
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)


(1)     Material changes in financial condition (continued):

        The FCC has authorized the provision of so-called "video-dialtone"
        services by which independent video programmers will deliver services
        to the home over telephone-provided circuits, thereby by-passing the
        local cable systems or other video providers. Although local exchange
        telephone carriers providing "video-dialtone" under the existing rules
        are allowed only a limited financial interest in programming services
        and must limit their role largely to that of a traditional "common
        carrier," the current status of these rules is uncertain under the
        court decisions referred to above. Numerous local exchange telephone
        carriers have filed applications with the FCC for authorization to
        construct video-dialtone systems and to provide such services. This
        alternative means of distribution of video services to consumer's
        homes, could eventually become a substantial competitor to TCIC's 
        cable and other video delivery systems.

        TCIC is obligated to pay fees for the license to exhibit certain
        qualifying films that are released theatrically by various motion
        picture studios from January 1, 1993 through December 31, 2002. The
        aggregate minimum liability under certain of the license agreements is
        approximately $105 million. The aggregate amount of the Film License
        Liability under other license agreements is not currently estimable
        because such amount is dependent upon the number of qualifying films
        produced by the motion picture studios, the amount of United States
        theatrical film rentals for such qualifying films, and certain other
        factors. Nevertheless, TCIC's aggregate payments under the Film License
        Liability could prove to be significant.

        TCIC is upgrading and installing optical fiber in its cable
        systems at a rate such that in three years TCIC anticipates that it
        will be serving the majority of its customers with state-of-the-art
        fiber optic cable systems. Through September 30, 1994, TCIC's capital
        expenditures amounted to $944 million. However, TCIC is continually
        reevaluating its capital expenditures and such expenditures are 
        subject to change based upon the effects to TCIC's liquidity arising 
        from rate regulation.
   
        Subsequent to September 30, 1994, the Company was reorganized based 
        upon four lines of business: Domestic Cable and Communications; 
        Programming; International Cable and Programming; and 
        Technology/Venture Capital. Upon reorganization, certain of the assets 
        of TCIC were transferred to the other operating units (e.g. TBS, QVC, 
        Discovery, TeleWest UK, etc.).
    
        Management believes that net cash provided by operating activities,
        TCIC's ability to obtain additional financing (including its available
        lines of credit and its access to public debt markets) and proceeds
        from disposition of assets will provide adequate sources of short-term
        and long-term liquidity in the future.


                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-57

<PAGE>   16
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)


(2)     Material changes in results of operations:

        On October 5, 1992, Congress enacted the 1992 Cable Act. In 1993 and
        1994, the FCC adopted certain rate regulations required by the 1992
        Cable Act and imposed a moratorium on certain rate increases. As a
        result of such actions, TCIC's Regulated Services are subject to the
        jurisdiction of local franchising authorities and the FCC. 

        Based on its analysis and interpretation of the FCC's 1993 and 1994
        rate regulations, TCIC estimates that the implementation of such
        regulations will result in an aggregate annualized reduction of revenue
        and operating income ranging from $280 million to $300 million.  The
        estimated annualized reduction in revenue assumes that the FCC will not
        require further reductions beyond the current regulations and is prior
        to any possible mitigating factors (none of which is assured) such as
        (i) the provision of alternate service offerings (ii) the
        implementation of rate adjustments to non-regulated services and (iii)
        the utilization of cost-of-service methodologies, as described below.

        Subject to certain limitations, the FCC's rate regulations generally
        permit cable operators to adjust rates to account for inflation and
        increases in certain external costs, including increases in programming
        costs and compulsory copyright fees and any increase in the number of
        regulated channels. 

        Cable operators may justify rates higher than the benchmark
        rates established by the FCC through demonstrating unusually high costs
        based upon cost-of-service showing. Under this methodology, cable
        operators may be allowed to recover through the rates they charge for
        Regulated Services, their normal operating expenses plus an interim
        rate of return of 11.25%, which rate may be subject to change in the
        future.        

        

                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-58

<PAGE>   17
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)


(2)     Material changes in results of operations (continued):

        TCIC believes that it has complied, in all material respects, with the
        provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, including its rate setting
        provisions. However, TCIC's rates for Regulated Services are subject to
        adjustment upon review, as described above. If, as a result of the
        review process, a system cannot substantiate its rates, it could be
        required to retroactively reduce its rates to the appropriate benchmark
        and refund the excess portion of rates received. Any refunds of the
        excess portion of tier service rates would be retroactive to the date
        of complaint. Any refunds of the excess portion of all other Regulated
        Service rates would be retroactive to the later of September 1, 1993,
        or one year prior to the certification date of the applicable franchise
        authority. The amount of refunds, if any, which could be payable by
        TCIC in the event that any system's rates were to be successfully
        challenged, is not considered to be material.

        Based on the foregoing, TCIC believes that the 1993 and 1994 rate
        regulations have had a material effect on its results of operations.

        Revenue increased by approximately 4% for the nine months ended 
        September 30, 1994 compared to the corresponding period of 1993. Such 
        increase was the result of growth in subscriber levels within TCIC's 
        cable television systems (4%), the effect of certain acquisitions (2%) 
        and certain new services (2%), net of a decrease in revenue (4%) due 
        to rate reductions required by rate regulation implemented pursuant to 
        the 1992 Cable Act. In the third quarter of 1994, TCIC experienced a 
        decrease in the price charged for those services that are subject to 
        rate regulation under the 1992 Cable Act.

        Operating costs and expenses have increased by 9% for the nine
        months ended September 30, 1994 compared to the corresponding period of
        1993. Due to the aforementioned program to upgrade and install optical
        fiber in its cable systems, capital expenditures and depreciation
        expense have increased. Additionally, TCIC incurred $30 million of
        programming and marketing  costs associated with the launch in February
        1994 of a new premium programming service to its subscribers. TCIC
        cannot determine whether  and to what extent increases in the cost of
        programming will effect its operating costs. Additionally, TCIC cannot
        predict how these increases  in the cost of programming will affect its
        revenue but intends to  recover additional costs to the extent allowed
        by the aforementioned  FCC rate regulations. TCIC recorded an adjustment
        of $6 million in 1994 to reduce its liability for compensation relating
        to stock appreciation rights resulting from a decline in the market
        price of TCI's Class A  common stock.
   
        At September 30, 1994, TCIC had an investment in TeleWest UK, a 
        company that is currently  operating and constructing cable television
        and telephone systems in  the UK. TeleWest UK, which is accounted for
        under the equity method,  had a carrying value at September 30, 1994 of
        $296 million and  accounted for $32 million and $17 million of TCIC's
        share of its affiliates' losses in 1994 and 1993, respectively. In
        February 1994, TCIC acquired a consolidated investment in Flextech, a
        programming and video distribution company located in the UK. Flextech
        accounted for $135 million of TCIC's total assets and $65 million of
        TCIC's equity investments at September 30, 1994 and has generated
        losses in 1994 of $18 million (before deducting the minority interests'
        40% share of such losses). In addition, at September 30, 1994, TCIC had
        other less significant investments in video distribution and
        programming businesses located in the UK, other parts of Europe, Asia
        and certain other foreign countries. In the aggregate, such other
        investments had a carrying value of $46 million at September 30, 1994
        and accounted for $14 million of TCIC's share of its affiliates' losses
        in 1994. As previously discussed, the Company was restructured
        subsequent to September 30, 1994. In connection with such
        restructuring, TCIC's ownership in the aforementioned entities will be
        transferred to another operating unit and TCIC will no longer be
        exposed to the risk associated with unfavorable fluctuations in foreign
        currency exchange rates. 
    
                                                                     (continued)





                                     I-59

<PAGE>   18
                   TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      (formerly Tele-Communications, Inc.)

(2)     Material changes in results of operations continued):

        TCIC's net earnings of $23 million for the three months ended
        September 30, 1994 represented an increase of $88 million as compared
        to TCIC's net loss (before preferred stock dividends) of $65
        million for the corresponding period of 1993. Such increase is
        principally the result of the effect of improved share of earnings from
        Liberty prior to the Mergers (principally resulting from the gain
        recognized by Liberty upon the sale of its investment in AMC) and the
        reduction in income tax expense (principally resulting from the
        required recognition in the third quarter of 1993 of the cumulative 
        effect of the change in the Federal income tax rate from 34% to 35%),
        net of the effect of the aforementioned reduction in rates charged for 
        Regulated Services.

        TCIC's net earnings of $61 million for the nine months ended
        September 30, 1994 represented an increase of $47 million as compared
        to TCIC's net earnings (before preferred stock dividends) of $14
        million for the corresponding period of 1993. Such increase is
        principally the result of the aforementioned increase in share of
        earnings of Liberty prior to the Mergers, the decrease in income tax
        expense, net of the aforementioned reduction in rates charged for
        Regulated Services and the decrease in gain on disposition of assets.





                                      I-60







© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission