<PAGE>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-4101
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE 74-1056569
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF IDENTIFICATION NO.)
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
77002
TENNECO BUILDING, HOUSTON, TEXAS (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (713) 757-2131
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C>
6% Debentures due 2011; 9 1/4% Notes due 1996; 9%
Notes due 1997....................................... New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: None
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE
REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH
FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES X NO
---- ----
STATE THE AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF THE VOTING STOCK HELD BY NON-AFFILIATES
OF THE REGISTRANT. THE AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE SHALL BE COMPUTED BY REFERENCE TO
THE PRICE AT WHICH THE STOCK WAS SOLD, OR THE AVERAGE BID AND ASKED PRICES OF
SUCH STOCK, AS OF A SPECIFIED DATE WITHIN 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF FILING.
None
INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING OF EACH OF THE REGISTRANT'S CLASSES
OF COMMON STOCK, AS OF THE CLOSE OF THE LATEST PRACTICABLE DATE. Common stock,
par value $5 per share, 200 shares outstanding as of March 28, 1995.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY MEETS THE CONDITIONS OF GENERAL INSTRUCTION
J(1)(A) AND (B) TO THE FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS REPORT WITH A
REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT AS PERMITTED BY SUCH INSTRUCTION.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<C> <S> <C>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.................................................... 1
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.............................. 1
Contributions of Major Businesses........................... 1
Natural Gas Pipelines....................................... 3
Automotive Parts............................................ 8
Packaging................................................... 10
Shipbuilding................................................ 12
Farm and Construction Equipment............................. 13
Chemicals................................................... 15
Other....................................................... 15
Business Strategy........................................... 15
Environmental Matters....................................... 16
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.................................................. 16
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS........................................... 16
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS......... 18
PART II
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
ITEM 5. STOCKHOLDER MATTERS........................................ 19
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA..................................... 19
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.................................. 19
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA................. 28
Index to Financial Statements of Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries...................... 28
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE................................... 60
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.......... *
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION...................................... *
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT................................................. *
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.............. *
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K........................................................ 60
Financial Statements Included in Item 8..................... 60
Index to Financial Statements and Schedules Included in Item
14......................................................... 60
Schedules Omitted as Not Required or Inapplicable........... 60
Reports on Form 8-K......................................... 68
Exhibits.................................................... 68
</TABLE>
--------
* No response to this item is included herein for the reason that no response
is required pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General
Instruction J to Form 10-K.
i
<PAGE>
PART I
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Tenneco Inc. As used herein, "Tennessee" refers to
the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The major businesses of Tennessee are the transportation and sale of natural
gas; manufacture and sale of automotive exhaust system parts and ride control
products; construction and repair of ships; and manufacture and sale of
packaging materials, cartons, containers and specialty packaging products. On
December 13, 1994, Tenneco Inc. announced that it intended to sell its
chemicals business through an initial public offering of Albright & Wilson plc
primarily in the United Kingdom in the first quarter of 1995. The transaction
was completed on March 8, 1995. For more information see "Chemicals". Also, at
December 31, 1994, Tennessee owned approximately 2% of Case Corporation, a
manufacturer of farm and construction equipment. For more information see "Farm
and Construction Equipment". See also "Business Strategy".
At December 31, 1994, Tennessee had approximately 54,000 employees (excluding
employees of Albright & Wilson plc and Case Corporation and their respective
subsidiaries).
CONTRIBUTIONS OF MAJOR BUSINESSES
Information concerning Tennessee's principal industry segments and geographic
areas is set forth in Note 13 of the Financial Statements of Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries. The following tables summarize
(i) net sales and operating revenues from continuing operations, (ii) income
(loss) from continuing operations before interest expense, income taxes and
minority interest and (iii) capital expenditures for continuing operations of
the major business groups of Tennessee for the periods indicated.
NET SALES AND OPERATING REVENUES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas pipelines.................... $2,378 28% $2,862 30% $2,183 23%
Farm and construction equipment(a)....... 518 6 1,014 11 1,256 14
Automotive parts......................... 1,850 21 1,628 17 1,616 17
Shipbuilding............................. 1,753 20 1,861 20 2,265 24
Packaging................................ 2,184 25 2,042 22 2,078 22
Other.................................... -- -- 1 -- 2 --
Intergroup sales......................... (7) -- (8) -- (6) --
------ --- ------ --- ------ ---
Total.................................. $8,676 100% $9,400 100% $9,394 100%
====== === ====== === ====== ===
</TABLE>
1
<PAGE>
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST EXPENSE, INCOME TAXES
AND MINORITY INTEREST
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ -----
(MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas pipelines.............................. $ 415 $ 411 $ 360
Farm and construction equipment(a)................. (1) 49(b) (264)(b)
Automotive parts................................... 205 198 210
Shipbuilding....................................... 200 225 249
Packaging.......................................... 209 139 221
Other.............................................. 193 219 211
------ ------ -----
Total............................................ $1,221 $1,241 $ 987
====== ====== =====
</TABLE>
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- --------
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN
MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas pipelines............................. $331 51% $170 39% $251 56%
Farm and construction equipment(a)................ 4 -- 11 3 5 1
Automotive parts.................................. 106 16 89 21 58 13
Shipbuilding...................................... 29 5 36 8 35 8
Packaging......................................... 166 26 124 29 97 22
Other............................................. 14 2 1 -- 2 --
---- --- ---- --- ---- ---
Total........................................... $650 100% $431 100% $448 100%
==== === ==== === ==== ===
</TABLE>
The interest expense, income taxes and minority interest from continuing
operations which are not allocated to the major businesses were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
(MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Expense (net of interest capitalized)............ $265 $278 $358
Income Tax Expense........................................ 290 329 325
Minority Interest......................................... 1 -- --
</TABLE>
--------
Notes: (a) In July 1994, Tennessee's accounting for its Farm and construction
equipment segment changed due to a reduction in its ownership
percentage. For the last six months of 1994, the Farm and
construction equipment segment was reflected in Tennessee's
financial statements using the cost method of accounting.
Accordingly, the segment's revenues are included in Tennessee's
reported revenues for six months only. For additional information,
see Notes 1 and 3 to the Financial Statements of Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries.
(b) Includes restructuring charge of $241 million related to Farm and
construction equipment in 1992 reduced by $62 million in 1993. For
additional information concerning these charges, see Note 14 to the
Financial Statements of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and
Consolidated Subsidiaries and Item 7, "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
2
<PAGE>
NATURAL GAS PIPELINES
Tennessee is engaged in the interstate and intrastate transportation and
marketing of natural gas. Its natural gas operations are conducted by Tenneco
Gas Inc. and other subsidiaries of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
(collectively, "Tenneco Gas"). In addition, Tenneco Gas has started building
new business units that are not generally subject to regulation by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") and that Tenneco Gas believes have the
potential to generate higher returns than its regulated businesses. The
principal activities of these business units include development of and
participation in international natural gas pipeline and international and
domestic gas-fired power generation projects; and establishment of natural gas
production financing programs for producers.
INTERSTATE PIPELINE OPERATIONS
Historically, interstate pipeline companies served primarily as merchants of
natural gas, purchasing gas under long-term contracts with numerous producers
and reselling gas to local distribution companies under long-term sales
agreements. Interstate pipelines were not required to transport gas for
customers who did not purchase the gas from the pipeline company.
Commencing in 1984, the FERC issued a series of orders that have resulted in
a major restructuring of the natural gas transmission industry and its business
practices. This restructuring, coupled with a nationwide excess of deliverable
natural gas, resulted in increased competition for markets and decreased prices
for natural gas, and dramatically increased the ratio that pipelines'
transportation volumes bear to their total throughput. With full implementation
of the FERC's Order No. 636 (discussed below under the caption "Federal
Regulation"), most interstate pipeline companies now serve primarily as gas
transporters rather than gas merchants.
During this period, pipeline customers have turned more and more to marketers
of natural gas to secure natural gas supplies for them, make transportation
arrangements and provide other services. Generally, these gas marketers are not
subject to the extensive FERC regulations that apply to interstate pipelines,
and may be affiliates of regulated interstate pipeline companies. To respond to
the changing natural gas industry, Tenneco Gas has been providing natural gas
marketing services since 1984.
Tenneco Gas's interstate pipeline operations include the pipeline systems of
the Company, Midwestern Gas Transmission Company ("Midwestern") and East
Tennessee Natural Gas Company ("East Tennessee"), which are engaged in the
transportation, storage and, to a limited extent, sale of natural gas primarily
to or for other gas transmission or distribution companies for resale.
The Company's multiple-line system begins in gas-producing regions of Texas
and Louisiana, including the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico, and
extends into the northeastern section of the United States, including the New
York City and Boston metropolitan areas. Midwestern's pipeline system extends
from Portland, Tennessee, to Chicago, and principally serves the Chicago
metropolitan area. East Tennessee's pipeline system serves the states of
Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia.
At December 31, 1994, Tennessee's interstate gas transmission systems
included approximately 16,300 miles of pipeline, gathering lines and sales
laterals, together with related facilities that include 91 compressor stations
with an aggregate of approximately 1.5 million horsepower. These systems also
include underground and above-ground gas storage facilities to permit increased
deliveries of gas during peak demand periods. The total design delivery
capacity of Tennessee's interstate systems at December 31, 1994, was
approximately 4,822 million cubic feet ("MMCF") of gas per day, and
approximately 5,628 MMCF on peak demand days, which includes gas withdrawal
from storage.
3
<PAGE>
Joint Ventures
Tennessee also has interests in several joint ventures formed to own and
operate interstate pipeline systems. These interests include a 50% interest in
Kern River Gas Transmission Company ("Kern River") and a 13.2% interest in
Iroquois Gas Transmission Company ("Iroquois").
Kern River, which owns a 904-mile pipeline system extending from Wyoming to
California with a design capacity of 700 MMCF of gas per day, completed its
third year of operations in 1994. In 1993, Kern River implemented Order No. 636
with no adverse effect to the pipeline's normal business flow. In 1994, Kern
River successfully settled its rate case which was originally filed in August
1992. The settlement will become effective upon the issuance date of a final
FERC order, no longer subject to rehearing, which is expected during the second
quarter of 1995. An order approving the settlement was issued by the FERC on
January 25, 1995 and is currently pending rehearing. The settlement will not
have an impact on Tennessee's net income.
The 370-mile Iroquois pipeline began initial operation in late 1991 and
became fully operational in January 1992. The pipeline extends from the
Canadian border at Waddington, New York, to Long Island, New York, and, with
additional compression added in 1994, is designed to deliver (directly or
through interconnecting pipelines such as Tennessee Gas Pipeline) 714 MMCF of
gas per day to local distribution companies and electric generation facilities
in six states. For more information on Iroquois, see Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings."
Gas Sales and Transportation Volumes
The following table sets forth the volumes of gas, stated in billions of
British thermal units ("BBtu"), sold and transported by Tennessee's interstate
pipeline systems for the periods shown.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales*......................................... 131,097 213,210 239,287
Transportation*................................ 2,183,944 2,118,936 2,015,440
--------- --------- ---------
Total........................................ 2,315,041 2,332,146 2,254,727
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
--------
* These sales and transportation volumes include all natural gas sold or
transported by Tennessee's interstate pipeline companies. The table includes
Tennessee's proportionate share of sales and transportation volumes of the
joint ventures in which it has interests; of the total volumes shown,
167,961 BBtu was attributable to these joint venture interests in 1994,
169,871 BBtu in 1993 and 128,263 BBtu in 1992. Intercompany deliveries of
natural gas have not been eliminated from the table.
Federal Regulation
Tennessee's interstate natural gas pipeline companies are "natural gas
companies" as defined in the Natural Gas Act of 1938, as amended (the "Natural
Gas Act"). As such, these companies are subject to the jurisdiction of the
Department of Energy, including the FERC. Tennessee's interstate pipeline
operations are operated pursuant to certificates of public convenience and
necessity issued under the Natural Gas Act and pursuant to the Natural Gas
Policy Act of 1978. The FERC regulates the interstate transportation and
certain sales of natural gas, including, among other things, rates and charges
allowed natural gas companies, extensions and abandonments of facilities and
service, rates of depreciation and amortization and the accounting system
utilized by the companies.
Prior to the FERC's industry restructuring initiatives in the 1980's,
Tennessee's interstate pipeline companies operated primarily as merchants,
purchasing natural gas under long-term contracts and reselling the gas to
customers, again under long-term contracts. With the FERC mandated conversion
from a primarily merchant to a primarily transportation business, the Company's
sales, and hence its purchases of gas for resale, declined precipitously, and
the Company incurred significant liability to its producers under its long-term
gas supply contracts, many of which specified prices at above market levels. In
1992, pursuant to Order
4
<PAGE>
636 issued by the FERC, the Company implemented revisions to its tariff which
put into effect on September 1, 1993, the restructuring of its transportation,
storage and sales services. Pursuant to the provisions of Order 636 allowing
for the recovery of transition costs related to the restructuring, the Company
has made filings to recover gas production costs related to its Bastian Bay
facilities, the remaining balance of purchased gas ("PGA") costs, stranded
transportation ("TBO") costs, and gas supply realignment ("GSR") costs
resulting from remaining gas purchase obligations.
The Company's filings to recover production costs related to its Bastian Bay
facilities have been rejected by the FERC based on the continued use of the gas
production from the field; however, the FERC recognized the ability of the
Company to file for the recovery of losses upon disposition of these assets.
The Company has filed for appellate review of the FERC actions and believes
that the Bastian Bay costs will ultimately be recovered as transition costs
directly related to Order 636, and no FERC order has questioned the ultimate
recoverability of these costs.
The filings implementing the Company's recovery mechanisms for the following
transition costs were accepted effective September 1, 1993, and made subject to
refund pending FERC review: 1) direct-billing of unrecovered PGA costs to its
former sales customers over a twelve-month period; 2) recovery of TBO costs,
which the Company is obligated to pay under existing contracts, through a
surcharge from firm transportation customers, adjusted annually; and 3) GSR
cost recovery of 90% of such costs over a period of up to 36 months from firm
transportation customers and recovery of 10% of such costs from interruptible
transportation customers.
Following negotiations with its customers, the Company filed in July 1994
with the FERC a Stipulation and Agreement (the "PGA Stipulation"), which
provides for the recovery of PGA costs of approximately $100 million and the
recovery of costs associated with the transfer of storage gas inventory to new
storage customers in the Company's restructuring proceeding. The PGA
Stipulation eliminates all challenges to the PGA costs, but establishes a cap
on the charges that may be imposed upon former sales customers. On November 15,
1994, the FERC issued an order approving the PGA Stipulation and resolving all
outstanding issues. However, certain customers have requested a rehearing and
the FERC has deferred action on their issues to a later date. The Company
implemented the terms of the PGA Stipulation on December 1, 1994, and expects
to make refunds in 1995. The Company has recorded a liability which it believes
is adequate to cover the PGA refunds.
The Company is recovering TBO costs formerly incurred to perform its sales
functions, subject to refund, pending review of data submitted by the Company
through technical conference proceedings. On November 18, 1994, the FERC issued
an order on the Company's initial TBO surcharge filing to recover TBO costs for
the twelve-month period beginning September 1, 1993. The order required the
Company to remove certain costs from this surcharge, subject to FERC's review
at a second technical conference and FERC's consideration of a request for
rehearing. On November 30, 1994, the Company filed for a surcharge to recover
approximately $25 million of TBO costs in compliance with the FERC's order, and
in a separate filing, the Company filed to recover its projected annual TBO
costs of approximately $21 million for the twelve-month period beginning
September 1, 1994, through a new TBO surcharge. The FERC accepted the Company's
filing to recover its projected TBO costs, subject to refund, pending review
through technical conference proceedings.
In connection with the Company's GSR cost recovery discussed below, the
Company, along with three other pipelines, executed four separate settlement
agreements with Dakota Gasification Company and the U.S. Department of Energy
and initiated four separate proceedings at the FERC seeking approval to
implement the settlement agreements. The settlement resolved litigation
concerning purchases made by the Company of synthetic gas produced from the
Great Plains Coal Gasification plant ("Great Plains"). On October 18, 1994, the
FERC consolidated the four proceedings and set them for hearing before an
administrative law judge who is to issue his initial decision by December 31,
1995. The FERC has committed to a final order by December 31, 1996. The FERC
order stated that the costs related to the Great Plains
5
<PAGE>
project are eligible for recovery through GSR and other special recovery
mechanisms and that the costs are eligible for recovery for the duration of the
term of the original gas purchase agreements. The hearing will be limited to
the issue of whether the settlement agreements are prudent.
Also in connection with the Company's GSR cost recovery proceedings discussed
below, on October 14, 1993, the Company was sued in the State District Court of
Ector County, Texas by ICA Energy, Inc. ("ICA") and TransTexas Gas Corporation
("TransTexas"). In that suit, ICA and TransTexas contended that the Company had
an obligation to purchase gas production which TransTexas thereafter attempted
to add unilaterally to the reserves originally dedicated to a 1979 gas
contract. On two subsequent occasions, TransTexas gave the Company notice that
it was adding new production and/or acreage "to the contract." An amendment to
the pleadings seeks $1.5 billion from the Company for alleged damages caused by
the Company's refusal to purchase gas produced from the TransTexas leases
covering the new production and lands. Neither ICA nor TransTexas were original
parties to that contract. However, they contend that any stranger acquiring a
fractional interest in the original committed reserves thereby obtains a right
to add to the contract unlimited volumes of gas production from locations in
South Texas. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims of
ICA and TransTexas, which defenses it will vigorously assert.
As of December 31, 1994, the Company has deferred GSR costs yet to be
recovered from its customers of approximately $177 million, net of $187 million
previously collected from its customers, subject to refund. Proceedings have
commenced to review the recovery of these GSR costs; however, the FERC has also
generally encouraged pipelines to settle such issues through negotiations with
customers. Although Order 636 contemplates the complete recovery by pipelines
of qualified transition costs, the Company has initiated settlement discussions
with its customers concerning the amount of recoverable GSR costs in response
to recent FERC and customer statements acknowledging the desirability of such
settlements. The Company is also engaged in separate settlement and contract
reformation discussions with holders of certain gas purchase contracts who have
sued the Company, although the Company believes that its defenses in the
underlying gas purchase contract actions are meritorious.
Given the uncertainty over the results of ongoing discussions between the
Company and its customers related to the recovery of GSR costs and the
uncertainty related to predicting the outcome of its gas purchase contract
reformation efforts and the associated litigation, Tennessee is unable to
predict the timing or the ultimate impact the resolution of these issues will
have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. For
additional information, see Note 6 in the "Notes to Financial Statements".
The FERC issued final orders approving the Company's Stipulation and
Agreement partially resolving its 1991 rate case. Pursuant to these final FERC
orders, rates for the period February 1, 1992, through August 31, 1993, were
approved, and the Company paid refunds for this period on June 3, 1994. The
refunds had no material effect on reported net income. Also pursuant to these
orders, rates for the period after September 1, 1993, were approved and the
Company paid refunds for the period September 1, 1993 to October 31, 1994, in
February 1995. As of December 31, 1994, the Company had recorded a liability
which was adequate to cover its estimated refund obligations.
On December 30, 1994, the Company filed a general rate increase in Docket No.
RP95-112 which reflected an increase in the Company's revenue requirement of
$118 million, including recovery of certain environmental costs as discussed in
Note 15 in the "Notes to Financial Statements". On January 25, 1995, the FERC
accepted the filing, suspended its effectiveness for the maximum period of five
months pursuant to normal regulatory process, and set the matter for hearing.
This order also required the convening of a technical conference to address
various concerns raised by the FERC and the Company's customers over, among
other issues, the Company's ability to provide its shippers with timely and
accurate operating and billing information, and the associated systems costs.
The ultimate resolution of these issues may result in adjustments to customer
billings. Subject to the outcome of these issues and certain modifications
identified in the FERC order, the increased rates will become effective on July
1, 1995, subject to refund.
6
<PAGE>
Competition
The natural gas pipeline industry is experiencing increasing competition in
virtually every aspect of operations, which is the result of actions by the
FERC to strengthen market forces throughout the industry. In a number of key
markets, Tennessee's interstate pipelines face competitive pressure from other
major pipeline systems, enabling local distribution companies and end users to
choose a supplier or switch suppliers based on the short term price of the gas
and the cost of transportation. Competition between pipelines is particularly
intense in Midwestern's Chicago and Northern Indiana markets, in East
Tennessee's Roanoke, Chattanooga and Atlanta markets, and in Tennessee's supply
area, Louisiana and Texas. Even in other markets, such as the Company's New
England market, displacement of load to other pipelines is possible during
summer or other low demand seasons. Tenneco Gas pipelines have frequently been
required to discount their transportation rates to maintain market share.
Gas Supply
With full implementation of Order No. 636, the Company's firm sales
obligations requiring maintenance of long-term gas purchase contracts have
declined from over a 1.4 billion dekatherm maximum daily delivery obligation to
less than a 200 million dekatherm maximum daily delivery obligation. As
discussed above under the caption "Federal Regulation", the Company has
substantially reduced its natural gas purchase portfolio in line with these
requirements through termination and assignment to third parties. Although the
Company's requirements for purchased gas are substantially less than prior to
its implementation of Order No. 636, Tenneco Gas is pursuing the attachment of
gas supplies to, and transportation by others through, the Company's system.
Current gas supply activities include development of offshore and onshore
pipeline gathering projects and utilization of production financing programs to
spur exploration and development drilling in areas adjacent to the Company's
system. Major gathering systems in the Mobile Bay and Viosca Knoll area of the
Gulf of Mexico were completed during the fourth quarter of 1994.
GAS MARKETING AND INTRASTATE PIPELINES
Tenneco Energy Resources Corporation ("TERC") was established in 1993 as the
holding company for several subsidiaries of Tenneco Gas engaged in nonregulated
businesses, including Tenneco Gas Marketing Company, Tenneco Gas Gathering
Company, Tenneco Gas Trading Company, Tenneco Gas Processing Company and the
companies that collectively comprise the Tenneco Gas Intrastate Group. Together
these companies provide the gas industry with a wide range of products and
services, including buying, selling, gathering and shipping of natural gas;
price risk management services; and liquids processing.
The Tenneco Gas Intrastate Group owns approximately 1,200 miles of intrastate
pipelines in Texas and manages the buying, selling and transportation services
for a volume of approximately 1.1 Bcf of natural gas per day. Within the
Intrastate Group is an ownership in the Oasis Pipe Line which serves the Texas
Gulf Coast and West Texas markets. This group also provides swing storage
services and access to major intrastate and interstate pipelines in Texas.
The following table sets forth the volumes of gas, stated in BBtu, sold by
subsidiaries of TERC and transported by Tennessee's nonregulated pipelines for
the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
--------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales.............................................. 739,432 741,800 494,445
Transportation..................................... 273,587 235,940 168,776
--------- ------- -------
Total............................................ 1,013,019 977,740 663,221
========= ======= =======
</TABLE>
In 1994, TERC issued stock to Ruhrgas AG, resulting in dilution of
Tennessee's ownership interest in TERC from 100% to 80%.
7
<PAGE>
TENNECO VENTURES
Tenneco Gas Production Corporation ("TGPC") and Tenneco Ventures Corporation
("Ventures"), subsidiaries of the Company, together with institutional
investors and partners, invest in oil and gas properties by acquiring interests
in properties or providing financing to producers for exploration and
development. As of December 31, 1994, Ventures and TGPC hold various ownership
interests in offshore oil and natural gas fields in the Gulf of Mexico and in
onshore Texas and Louisiana properties and own reserves estimated at over 100
Bcf equivalent.
OTHER
Tenneco Gas International Inc. ("Tenneco Gas International") and Tenneco
Power Generation Company were formed to extend Tennessee's traditional
interests in North American pipelines to pipeline, power, and energy-related
projects throughout the world, with a current focus on activities in four
regions: South America, Southeast Asia, Australia, and Europe. Tenneco Gas
International, through an Australian affiliate, has been selected to construct,
own and operate a 470 mile natural gas pipeline in Queensland, Australia;
subject to the completion of all agreements, construction of the pipeline is
expected to commence in mid 1995 and be completed by the end of 1996. Tenneco
Gas International also has interests in two consortiums pursuing the
development of two natural gas projects in South America (Argentina to Chile
and Bolivia to Brazil) including both pipelines and gas-fired electric
generation plants. Tenneco Power Generation Company has a 17.5% interest in a
240 megawatt power plant in Springfield, Massachusetts, and is in the process
of completing the acquisition of a 50% interest in two additional cogeneration
projects with 224 megawatts capacity.
AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
The principal business operations of Tenneco Automotive and its affiliates
are Walker Manufacturing Company and Monroe Auto Equipment Company.
Walker Manufacturing Company and its affiliates ("Walker") manufacture a
variety of automotive exhaust systems and emission control products. In the
United States, Walker operates eight manufacturing facilities and seven
distribution centers, three of which are located at manufacturing facilities,
and also has two research and development facilities. In addition to the
facilities included in the Gillet acquisition described below, Walker operates
ten manufacturing facilities located in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom,
Mexico, Denmark, Germany, France, Portugal and Sweden.
Walker's products are sold to automotive manufacturers for use as original
equipment and to wholesalers and retailers for sale as replacement equipment.
Sales to the original equipment market are directly dependent on new car sales,
and sales to the replacement market are related to the service life of original
equipment and to the level of maintenance by individual owners of their
automobiles. The service life of exhaust systems has increased in recent years,
resulting in a longer time period for the exhaust replacement rate.
8
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth information relating to Walker's sales:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
SALES
----------------
1994* 1993 1992
----- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States Sales
Automotive replacement equipment (primarily exhaust
system parts)......................................... 48% 52% 53%
Automotive original equipment.......................... 52 48 47
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
Foreign Sales
Automotive replacement equipment....................... 74% 78% 81%
Automotive original equipment.......................... 26 22 19
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
Total Sales by Geographic Area
United States.......................................... 65% 67% 65%
European Community..................................... 27 26 31
Canada................................................. 0 0 0
Other areas............................................ 8 7 4
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
</TABLE>
--------
* Does not include sales of Gillet (described below), which was acquired on
November 30, 1994.
On November 30, 1994, Walker acquired ownership of Heinrich Gillet GmbH &
Company and its affiliates ("Gillet"), a manufacturer of exhaust systems
headquartered at Edenkoben, Germany. The combination of Gillet, Europe's
largest original equipment exhaust supplier, and Walker's European division,
which is Europe's biggest replacement market supplier, is expected to more than
double Walker's European business.
Gillet operates 14 plants in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Spain,
Portugal and the Czech Republic and operates an engineering and technology
center in Edenkoben. As a part of Tenneco Automotive's European consolidation
plan, Tenneco Automotive plans to consolidate its headquarters and engineering
center in Europe with the Gillet facilities by the end of the second quarter of
1995. A consolidation of Tenneco Automotive's and Gillet's manufacturing
facilities will occur later in 1995 and in early 1996.
In addition to the "Walker" line, Walker manufactures and distributes exhaust
systems under a number of other brand names in the United States and foreign
countries.
Monroe Auto Equipment Company and its affiliates ("Monroe") are engaged
principally in the design, manufacture and distribution of ride control
products. Monroe ride control products consist of hydraulic shock absorbers,
air adjustable shock absorbers, spring assisted shock absorbers, gas charged
shock absorbers, struts, replacement cartridges and electronically adjustable
suspension systems. Monroe manufactures and markets replacement shock absorbers
for virtually all domestic and most foreign makes of automobiles. In addition,
Monroe manufactures and markets shock absorbers and struts for use as original
equipment on passenger cars and trucks, as well as for other uses. Monroe has
six manufacturing facilities in the United States and eight foreign
manufacturing operations in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the
United Kingdom and Spain.
9
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth information relating to Monroe's sales:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
SALES
----------------
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States Sales
Automotive replacement equipment...................... 72% 72% 77%
Automotive original equipment......................... 28 28 23
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
Foreign Sales
Automotive replacement equipment...................... 66% 65% 61%
Automotive original equipment......................... 34 35 39
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
Total Sales by Geographic Area
United States......................................... 55% 58% 52%
European Community.................................... 36 33 35
Canada................................................ 0 0 0
Other areas........................................... 9 9 13
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
</TABLE>
Tenneco Automotive is actively pursuing opportunities to expand its business
by entering additional geographic areas, including countries in Eastern Europe,
Asia and South America. It is anticipated that this expansion will occur
through a variety of means, including joint ventures and acquisitions.
On December 23, 1994, the automotive parts business completed the sale of its
brakes business. The brakes business consisted of the manufacture of non-
asbestos friction material for brakes for cars and light trucks and the
manufacture of non-asbestos friction brakes for heavy-duty vehicles. For
additional information, see Note 3 in the "Notes to Financial Statements."
The operations of Tenneco Automotive face intense competition from other
manufacturers of automotive equipment.
PACKAGING
Packaging Corporation of America and other Tennessee subsidiaries ("PCA")
manufacture and sell containerboard, paperboard, corrugated shipping
containers, folding cartons, disposable plastic and aluminum containers, molded
fiber products, and other related products. Its shipping container products are
used in the packaging of food, paper products, metal products, rubber and
plastics, automotive products and point of purchase displays. Its folding
cartons are used in the packaging of soap and detergent, food products and a
wide range of other consumer goods. Uses for its molded fiber products include
produce and egg packaging, food service items and institutional and consumer
disposable dinnerware, as well as a wide range of other consumer and industrial
goods. Its disposable plastic and aluminum containers are sold to the food
service, food processing and related industries. In addition to products
bearing the name "Packaging Corporation of America", PCA manufactures and
distributes products under the names "EZ POR", "Packaging Company of
California", "Revere Foil Containers", "Dahlonega Packaging", "Dixie
Container," "Agri-Pak" and "Pressware International."
10
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth information with respect to PCA's sales during
the past three years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
SALES
----------------
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales by Product Type
Corrugated shipping containers and containerboard products. 56% 53% 53%
Disposable plastic and aluminum products................... 20 22 21
Molded fiber products...................................... 9 9 10
Folding cartons and recycled paperboard mill products...... 9 10 10
Paper stock and other...................................... 6 6 6
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
Total Sales by Geographic Area
United States.............................................. 90% 88% 88%
European Community......................................... 5 7 8
Canada..................................................... 2 2 1
Other areas................................................ 3 3 3
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1994, PCA operated 55 container plants, seven folding carton
plants and 14 corrugated containerboard and paperboard machines at eight mills.
Two of the mills (located in Georgia and Wisconsin), including substantially
all of the equipment associated with both mills, are leased from third parties.
PCA also has eight molded fiber products plants, one pressed paperboard plant,
one lumber plant, three paper stock plants, and 10 disposable plastic and
aluminum container plants. PCA's plants are located primarily in the United
States. Its foreign plants are located in Great Britain, Spain, Canada,
Switzerland, Germany and Hungary. In 1994, PCA increased its ownership in a
Hungarian paperboard mill and folding carton plant from 30% to 100%, expanding
the number of foreign plants owned by PCA. In the United States, PCA has a 50%
ownership interest in a molded fiber distribution company and in a hardwood
chip mill. In addition, PCA has a 50% interest in a folding carton plant in
Dongguan, China, and a 50% interest in a folding carton plant in Bucharest,
Romania.
Generally, PCA faces intense competition from numerous competitors and
alternative products in each of its geographic and product markets.
The principal raw materials used by PCA in its mill operations are virgin
pulp and reclaimed paper stock and, in its specialty products operations,
aluminum and plastics. PCA obtains virgin pulp and reclaimed paper stock from
independent logging contractors, from timberlands owned or controlled by it,
from operation of its reclaimed paper stock collecting and processing plants
and from other sources. PCA obtains aluminum rolling stock and plastic feed
stock from various suppliers.
At December 31, 1994, PCA owned 183,000 acres of timberland in Alabama,
Michigan, Mississippi and Tennessee and leased, managed or had cutting rights
on an additional 820,000 acres of timberland in those states and in Florida,
Wisconsin and Georgia. During the years 1994, 1993 and 1992 approximately 20%,
22% and 18%, respectively, of the virgin fiber and timber used by PCA in its
operations was obtained from timberlands controlled by it.
11
<PAGE>
SHIPBUILDING
Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company ("Newport News"), a Tennessee
subsidiary located in Newport News, Virginia, is the largest privately owned
shipbuilding company in the United States. Its primary business is constructing
and overhauling nuclear-powered aircraft carriers for the United States Navy.
Newport News also overhauls and repairs U.S. Navy and commercial vessels and
refuels nuclear-powered ships. In recent months, Newport News has returned to
the commercial shipbuilding market with the October 1994 award of a two-ship
product tanker contract from a foreign owner. In addition, Newport News is
pursuing international sales of its fast frigate. Newport News' shipbuilding
facilities are located on the James River on approximately 475 acres of
property which it owns.
At December 31, 1994, the aggregate amount of Newport News' backlog of work
to be completed was approximately $5.6 billion (substantially all of which is
U.S. Navy-related), an increase from the backlog of $3.7 billion as of December
31, 1993. Although the cuts in naval shipbuilding following the end of the cold
war have continued to put pressure on the Newport News backlog, Newport News
was awarded the U.S. Navy contract in December 1994 to build Ronald Reagan, the
next aircraft carrier for the United States. At December 31, 1994, Newport
News anticipated that it would complete approximately $1.5 billion of the
current backlog by December 31, 1995, and an additional $1.0 billion in 1996.
The December 31, 1994, backlog of Newport News included contracts for the
construction of three Nimitz-class aircraft carriers and four Los Angeles-class
attack submarines. Also included in that backlog is a contract for the
conversion of two Sealift ships. The present backlog extends into 2002. Subject
to new orders, this existing backlog will decline as two submarines per year,
on average, are delivered through 1996, and the aircraft carriers are delivered
in 1995, 1998 and 2002.
Newport News has various other contracts for U.S. Navy design work and for
industrial projects. As is typical for similar Government contracts, all of
Newport News' contracts with the U.S. Navy are unilaterally terminable by the
U.S. Navy at its convenience with compensation for work completed and costs
incurred.
With respect to all U.S. Navy work, Newport News faces intense business
pressures in the future because of expected declines in the United States'
defense budget and excess ship building and repair capacity in the United
States. Due to uncertainties as to future defense spending levels and the
allocation of amounts appropriated for such spending to the various defense
programs involved, Tenneco is unable to predict the number or timing of
subsequent contracts for U.S. Navy construction or refueling and overhaul which
may be awarded.
To increase its competitiveness worldwide and in response to the anticipated
decline in U.S. Navy budgets, Newport News has reduced its workforce by
approximately 9,000 or 31% between December 31, 1990 and December 31, 1994.
Newport News is aggressively pursuing new business opportunities and
attempting to expand its business base in light of the declining U.S. Navy
backlog, although there is no assurance that it will be able to do so to a
material extent. Newport News recently executed contracts for two product
tankers and has been selected to build and manage a shipyard in Abu Dhabi.
These are examples of the early success in this diversification strategy. While
the mix of jobs between U.S. Navy and commercial work is expected to change
somewhat, the U.S. Navy will continue to be the leading customer of the
shipyard. Newport News is pursuing major U.S. Navy overhaul and repair work and
foreign military sales. For additional information, see Item 7, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
12
<PAGE>
FARM AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Case Corporation and its subsidiaries ("Case"), manufacture, market and
distribute farm equipment and light- and medium-sized construction equipment.
Case incorporated on April 22, 1994, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tenneco
Inc. ("Tenneco") for the purpose of acquiring Tenneco's farm and construction
equipment business (the "Case Business").
Case is a leading worldwide manufacturer and distributor of farm equipment
and of light- and medium-sized construction equipment. Case's market position
is particularly significant in several product categories, including
loader/backhoes and large, high-horsepower farm tractors and self-propelled
combines.
Case also manufactures and distributes replacement parts for various models
of its farm and construction equipment. Case supplies over 350,000 parts, many
of which are proprietary, to support products it has sold. Case distributes
these parts to dealers and distributors through a network of parts depots
throughout the world.
Case products are distributed through a network of approximately 4,100
independent dealers and 113 company-owned retail stores located in all 50
states and in approximately 150 countries throughout the world.
The farm equipment industry is highly competitive. Case competes with
several large national and international full-line suppliers, as well as
numerous short-line and specialty manufacturers with differing manufacturing
and marketing methods. The construction equipment industry has a broad
spectrum of competitors which specialize in various product lines and which
are globally dispersed.
REORGANIZATION AND PUBLIC OFFERINGS
In June 1994, pursuant to a Reorganization Agreement between Tenneco Inc.,
Case and Tenneco Equipment Corporation (the "Reorganization Agreement"), Case
and its subsidiaries acquired the business and assets of the farm and
construction equipment business (other than approximately $1.2 billion of U.S.
retail receivables) of Tenneco and its subsidiaries in exchange for the
following: (i) the assumption by Case and/or certain of its subsidiaries of
all liabilities of the Case Business existing prior to the acquisition of the
Case Business by Case and its subsidiaries (the "Reorganization"), except as
described below, (ii) demand notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1.552
billion (the "Demand Notes"), (iii) 70 million shares of Common Stock of Case,
(iv) 1,500,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock of
Case, and (v) $250 million aggregate principal amount of 10 1/2% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2002 (the "Subordinated Notes") (accrued interest on
which is payable in additional Subordinated Notes in lieu of cash until the
second anniversary of issuance). Case and its subsidiaries became responsible
and solely liable for all liabilities of the Case Business except for the
following liabilities retained by Tenneco and its subsidiaries:
(i) liabilities for pension benefits accrued by Case's then current and former
employees in the United States, both salaried and hourly, through the date of
the Reorganization, (ii) liabilities for postretirement health and life
insurance benefits for employees of the Case Business in the United States who
retired on or before July 1, 1994, and their dependents, in each case to the
extent that the Case Business was obligated on the date of the Reorganization,
(iii) certain liabilities for U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income
and franchise taxes as agreed by Tenneco and Case, (iv) approximately $1.9
billion of debt of Tenneco's finance subsidiaries not sold to Case arising
from the wholesale and retail financing programs historically offered by the
Case Business, and (v) certain remaining cash advances from affiliated
companies to subsidiaries that transferred net assets to Case but which
remained as subsidiaries of Tenneco. The Demand Notes were issued by Case and
certain of its subsidiaries in an aggregate principal amount equal to the
estimated fair market value of the business and assets transferred to them in
exchange for the Demand Notes and were paid in full contemporaneously with the
closing on June 30, 1994, of the initial public offering of Case's Common
Stock by certain subsidiaries of Tenneco, including the Company (the "Initial
Offering"), from the proceeds of a term loan and other available cash.
As a part of the Reorganization, the Company transferred all of its farm and
construction equipment net assets to Case for consideration of common stock
and cash.
13
<PAGE>
On June 30, 1994, Tenneco and certain of its subsidiaries, including the
Company, sold approximately 29% of Case Corporation's common stock in an
underwritten initial public offering and shares of Case Corporation Series A
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to unaffiliated investors in a
negotiated transaction, resulting in gross proceeds to Tenneco and its
subsidiaries of approximately $457,000,000. On November 22, 1994, Tenneco and
certain of its subsidiaries, including the Company, sold an additional
approximately 24% of the Case Corporation common stock in an underwritten
secondary public offering (the "Secondary Offering"). On December 8, 1994,
Tenneco Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries sold an additional 3% of the Case
Corporation common shares when the underwriters involved in the Secondary
Offering exercised their option to purchase additional shares to cover over-
allotments. The Secondary Offering resulted in gross proceeds to Tenneco and
its subsidiaries of approximately $368,000,000. The Company received proceeds
of $103,000,000 on the sale of the portion of its Case common shares included
in the initial and secondary public offerings.
In addition, as part of the Reorganization, Tenneco Credit Corporation, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Tenneco Inc., retained ownership of approximately
$1.2 billion of Case's U.S. retail receivables and related debt existing at the
time of the Reorganization which is not redeemable prior to maturity. At
December 31, 1994, approximately $879 million of the retail receivables
remained outstanding.
RESTRUCTURING OF CASE OPERATIONS
On March 21, 1993, the Board of Directors of Tenneco Inc. adopted a
comprehensive restructuring program for Case (the "Case Restructuring Program")
which resulted in a pre-tax charge of $920 million ($843 million after taxes,
or $5.85 per average common share), all of which was reflected in the 1992 loss
from continuing operations before interest expense, income taxes and minority
interest. Such pre-tax charge was reduced by $20 million and $16 million in
1993 and 1994, respectively. Implementation of the Case Restructuring Program
was commenced in 1993, and various restructuring actions in the program were
completed in 1993 and 1994 and others are in process. The Case Restructuring
Program is expected to be substantially completed by 1997.
The Case Restructuring Program is highly complex, and effectively
implementing it continues to be a major undertaking. The specific restructuring
measures were based on management's best business judgment under prevailing
circumstances and on assumptions which may be revised over time and as
circumstances change. Case continues to believe that the successful completion
of the Case Restructuring Program will enhance its operating income and pre-tax
cash flow over 1992 levels by approximately $200 million annually by 1997. For
additional information about Case's restructuring program, see Note 14 to
"Notes to the Financial Statements."
14
<PAGE>
CHEMICALS
On December 13, 1994, Tenneco announced its intention to sell its Albright &
Wilson Chemicals division in an initial public offering in the United Kingdom.
The offering was completed on March 8, 1995.
Albright & Wilson plc, a British-based chemical company, and its subsidiaries
("Albright & Wilson"), are engaged in the chemical business. Albright & Wilson
has four manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom, five manufacturing
facilities in the United States and, together with joint ventures, 26
additional manufacturing facilities in 14 other countries (Canada, Colombia,
Australia, Italy, France, Spain, Mexico and seven countries in Asia). In the
years 1994, 1993 and 1992, approximately 82%, 81% and 84%, respectively, of
Albright & Wilson's sales were made outside the United States.
The principal products of Albright & Wilson are phosphorus chemicals and
surfactants and a range of specialty chemicals for water management, flame
retardants and intermediates for pharmaceuticals and agricultural chemicals.
The following table sets forth sales of Albright & Wilson by product lines for
the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992*
---- ---- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Surfactants.................................................. 39% 40% 44%
Phosphorus chemicals......................................... 35 35 35
Specialty chemicals.......................................... 26 25 21
--- --- ---
Totals................................................... 100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
</TABLE>
--------
* Sales by Albright & Wilson's pulp chemicals business, which was sold
in 1992 have not been included.
Albright & Wilson has a 50% interest in a joint venture that owns and
operates a purified wet-process phosphoric acid plant in Aurora, North
Carolina, which has largely displaced the use of phosphorus as a feedstock for
phosphoric acid manufactured by Albright & Wilson in North America.
In December 1994, Albright & Wilson acquired a 50% interest in Troy Grupo
Industrial S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation whose principal subsidiary is
engaged in the manufacture of purified wet phosphoric acid and other phosphate
based chemicals.
OTHER
Tennessee has several wholly-owned finance subsidiaries which purchase
interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing trade receivables from its operating
subsidiaries. Prior to the Reorganization, Tenneco International Finance
Limited purchased wholesale receivables primarily generated by the sale or
lease of Case farm and construction equipment to its domestic and foreign
dealers and was funded primarily through private debt markets. Tenneco
International Finance Limited continues to be an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Since September 1991 Tenneco Inc., Tennessee's parent company, has focused on
various initiatives and taken steps designed to strengthen its financial
results and improve its financial flexibility and thereby generate greater
returns to its stockholders. Asset evaluation and redeployment have been and
will continue to be important parts of this strategy. Tenneco continues to
study opportunities for the strategic repositioning and restructuring of its
operations (including through acquisitions, dispositions, divestitures, spin-
offs and joint venture participation, wholly and partially, of various
businesses).
15
<PAGE>
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company estimates that its subsidiaries will make capital expenditures
for environmental matters of approximately $90 million in 1995 and that capital
expenditures for environmental matters will range from approximately $290
million to $484 million in the aggregate for the years 1996 through 2006.
For information regarding environmental matters see Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings--Environmental Proceedings" and "--Potential Superfund Liability",
Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations--Environmental Matters" and Note 15 "Commitments and
Contingencies" in the "Notes to Financial Statements." See also Note 1 "Summary
of Accounting Policies--Environmental Liabilities" in the "Notes to Financial
Statements."
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Reference is made to Item 1 for a description of Tennessee's properties.
Tennessee believes that substantially all of its plants and equipment are, in
general, well maintained and in good operating condition. They are considered
adequate for present needs and as supplemented by planned construction are
expected to remain adequate for the near future.
Tennessee is of the opinion that its subsidiaries have generally satisfactory
title to the properties owned and used in their respective businesses, subject
to liens for current taxes and easements, restrictions and other liens which do
not materially detract from the value of such property or the interests therein
or the use of such properties in their businesses.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
(1) Environmental Proceedings.
The Company is a party in proceedings involving federal and state authorities
regarding the past use by the Company of a lubricant containing polychlorinated
biphenyls ("PCBs") in its starting air systems.
The Company has executed a consent order with the United States Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") governing the remediation of its compressor stations
in Regions IV, V and VI. With respect to the stations in Regions II and III,
the EPA has advised the Company that it is deferring to the Pennsylvania and
New York environmental agencies to specify the remediation requirements
applicable to the Company. The Company anticipates that it will soon reach an
agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources ("PaDER")
and will enter into a consent order on remediation at the Pennsylvania stations
(under which the Company also agrees to pay a civil penalty and, in addition,
to make a contribution for environmental projects); meanwhile, the Company will
continue its negotiations with the New York Department of Environmental
Conservation on remediation at the New York stations. Tennessee believes that
the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse effect
on the financial position or results of operations of the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries. See Notes 6 and 15 to "Notes to Financial
Statements" for additional information.
In Commonwealth of Kentucky, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection
Cabinet v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (Franklin County Circuit Court, Docket
No. 88-C1-1531, November 16, 1988), the Kentucky environmental agency alleges
that the Company discharged pollutants into the waters of the state without a
permit and seeks an injunction against future discharges and a civil penalty.
Counsel for Tennessee are unable to express an opinion as to its ultimate
outcome. Tennessee believes that the resolution of this issue will not have a
material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
A subsidiary of the Company owns a 13.2% general partnership interest in
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ("Iroquois"), which owns an interstate
natural gas pipeline from the Canadian border through
16
<PAGE>
the states of New York and Connecticut to Long Island. The operator of the
pipeline is Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company ("the Operator"), a subsidiary
of TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd., an affiliate of TransCanada Iroquois, Ltd.,
which is also a partner in Iroquois.
In early 1992, Iroquois was informed by U.S. Attorneys' Offices for the
Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of New York that a civil
investigation had been initiated to determine whether civil environmental
violations occurred during construction of the pipeline. In February 1992, 26
alleged violations were identified to Iroquois in writing. In response,
Iroquois denied that such violations had occurred and asserted that all
concerns raised by governmental authorities during construction had been fully
addressed. Iroquois subsequently was informed that the alleged violations
included certain matters referred to in field reports prepared by a
Federal/State Inter-Agency Task Force which surveyed the right-of-way in
connection with the right-of-way restoration program. Iroquois responded to the
appropriate U.S. Attorneys' Offices that none of the matters referenced in
field reports issued to date represent violations of any law or governmental
authorization. As of March 28, 1995, no proceedings in connection with this
civil investigation have been commenced against Iroquois by the federal
government.
On December 3, 1993, Iroquois received notification from the Enforcement
Staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Office of the General
Counsel ("Enforcement") that Enforcement has commenced a preliminary, non-
public investigation concerning the construction of certain of Iroquois'
pipeline facilities. That office has requested certain information regarding
such construction. In addition, on December 27, 1993, Iroquois received a
similar request for information from the Army Corps of Engineers requesting
certain information regarding permit compliance in connection with certain
aspects of the pipeline's construction. By a notice issued on February 6, 1995,
the Public Service Commission of the State of New York (the "NYPSC") also has
requested Iroquois to respond to certain allegations set out in a petition
filed by GASP Coalition and Anne Marie Mueser in January 1995 with the NYPSC
requesting an investigation by the NYPSC of aspects of the construction of the
pipeline. Iroquois has been evaluating and responding to these agencies'
requests for information. No proceedings have been commenced against Iroquois
in connection with these agency inquiries.
A criminal investigation relating to the construction of the pipeline
facilities has been initiated by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern
District of New York in conjunction with the EPA and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation ("FBI"). According to a press release issued by the FBI in June
1992, areas under investigation include possible environmental violations, wire
fraud, mail fraud and providing false information or concealment of information
from federal agencies in conjunction with construction of the pipeline. While
no criminal charges have been filed to date, counsel for Iroquois and counsel
for the Operator have met with the Assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the
investigation and plan to meet with him again in the near future in order to
discuss the issues under investigation and to explore the possibility of a
negotiated resolution of the issues raised in the criminal, civil and
administrative inquiries (a "global resolution"). In the absence of a
negotiated resolution, Iroquois deems it probable that the U.S. Attorney will
seek indictments and, in them, substantial fines and other sanctions.
As a general partner, the Company's subsidiary may be jointly and severally
liable with the other partners for the liabilities of Iroquois. The Company has
a contract to provide gas dispatching as well as post-construction field
operation and maintenance services for the Operator of Iroquois, but the
Company is not the Operator and is not an affiliate of the Operator. Moreover,
the foregoing proceedings and investigations have not affected pipeline
operations. Based upon information available to the Company at March 28, 1995,
Tennessee believes that neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a
target of the criminal investigation described above. Further, while a global
resolution of these inquiries could have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of Iroquois, Tennessee believes that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
17
<PAGE>
On August 2, 1993, the Department of Justice filed suit against Packaging
Corporation of America ("PCA") in the Federal District Court for the Northern
District of Indiana, alleging that wastewater from PCA's molded fiber products
plant in Griffith, Indiana interfered with or damaged the Town of Griffith's
municipal sewage pumping station on two occasions in 1991 and 1993, resulting
in discharges by the Town of Griffith of untreated wastewater into a river. PCA
and the Department of Justice have agreed in principle to settle the suit.
Specifics of the consent decree are still being negotiated by PCA and the
Department of Justice.
(2) Potential Superfund Liability.
At December 31, 1994, Tennessee has been designated as a potentially
responsible party in 66 "Superfund" sites. With respect to its pro rata share
of the remediation costs of certain sites, Tennessee is fully indemnified by
third parties. With respect to certain other sites, Tennessee has sought to
resolve its liability through payments to the other potentially responsible
parties. For the remaining sites, Tennessee has estimated its share of the
remediation costs to be between $13 million and $72 million or 0.4% to 2.2% of
the total remediation costs for those sites and has provided reserves that it
believes are adequate for such costs. Because the clean-up costs are estimates
and are subject to revision as more information becomes available about the
extent of remediation required, Tennessee's estimate of its share of
remediation costs could change. Moreover, liability under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act is joint and several,
meaning that Tennessee could be required to pay in excess of its pro rata share
of remediation costs. Tennessee's understanding of the financial strength of
other potentially responsible parties has been considered, where appropriate,
in Tennessee's determination of its estimated liability. Tennessee does not
believe that the costs associated with its current status as a potentially
responsible party in the Superfund sites described above will be material to
its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
For additional information concerning environmental matters, see the caption
"Environmental Matters" under Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations", and the caption "Environmental
Matters" under Note 15 to the Financial Statements.
(3) Other Proceedings.
On October 14, 1993, the Company was sued in the State District Court of
Ector County, Texas, by ICA Energy, Inc. ("ICA") and TransTexas Gas Corporation
("TransTexas"). In that suit, ICA and TransTexas contended that the Company had
an obligation to purchase gas production which TransTexas thereafter attempted
to add unilaterally to the reserves originally dedicated to a 1979 gas
contract. On two subsequent occasions, TransTexas gave the Company notice that
it was adding new production and/or acreage "to the contract". An amendment to
the pleadings seeks $1.5 billion from the Company for alleged damages caused by
the Company's refusal to purchase gas produced from the TransTexas leases
covering the new production and lands. Neither ICA nor TransTexas were original
parties to that contract. However, they contend that any stranger acquiring a
fractional interest in the original committed reserves thereby obtains a right
to add to the contract unlimited volumes of gas production from locations in
South Texas. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims of
ICA and TransTexas, which defenses it will vigorously assert. For additional
information, see Note 6 in the "Notes to Financial Statements".
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to numerous other legal
proceedings arising from their operations. The Company believes that the
outcome of these other proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will
have no material effect on Tennessee's consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.
18
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS.
All of the capital stock of the Company is owned by Tenneco Inc. and,
therefore, there is no trading market for such securities.
Except as set forth below, such dividends as may be determined by the Board
of Directors may be declared and paid on the Common Stock from time to time out
of any funds legally available therefor.
Agreements under which certain indebtedness of the Company is outstanding
contain provisions restricting the Company's right to pay dividends and make
other distributions on its Common Stock. At December 31, 1994, under its most
restrictive dividend provision, the Company had approximately $2.9 billion of
retained earnings available for the payment of dividends on its Common Stock.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
Item 6, "Selected Financial Data", has been omitted from this report pursuant
to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction J to Form 10-
K.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
The following review of the results of operations and financial condition of
the Company and consolidated subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.
YEARS 1994 AND 1993
1994 STRATEGIC ACTIONS
During 1994, Tennessee completed or initiated several strategic objectives.
These actions included the following:
. In June 1994, Tenneco completed an IPO of approximately 29 percent of the
common stock of Case. In November 1994, a secondary offering of Case common
stock reduced Tenneco's ownership interest in Case to approximately 44
percent. Tenneco's combined proceeds from the two transactions were $694
million, net of commissions and expenses. Prior to the IPO, Tenneco
reorganized this segment resulting in Tennessee selling all of its farm and
construction equipment net assets to Case Corporation for consideration of
Case Corporation common stock and cash. In connection with the
reorganization, IPO and secondary offering, Tennessee received net proceeds
of $204 million and recognized a loss of $33 million, including $35 million
of income tax benefit. Although Tennessee recorded a loss on these
transactions, Tenneco in the aggregate recorded a gain of $36 million,
including a $7 million tax benefit. (Reference is made to Note 3,
"Discontinued Operations, Disposition of Assets and Extraordinary Loss," in
the "Notes to Financial Statements" for additional information.)
. In December, Tenneco announced its intent to offer 100 percent of Albright &
Wilson, its chemical segment, in an IPO offered primarily in the United
Kingdom. This resulted in an after-tax loss on the sale of $166 million and
net proceeds of $707 million. The offering was completed in early March 1995.
. New projects or acquisitions have been announced representing capital
commitments of approximately $600 million over the next three years as a part
of the strategy to redeploy assets from slower-growth cyclical businesses
into higher-growth areas. These commitments include new international
projects in Australia, India, China and Germany, as well as domestic
opportunities in packaging and natural gas.
19
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
REVENUES
Revenues for 1994 were $8.68 billion, down from $9.40 billion in 1993.
Natural gas pipelines revenues were down $484 million or 17 percent as
customers shifted from sales to transportation service in the regulated
business and gas prices fell in the nonregulated gas marketing business.
Revenues for farm and construction equipment were $518 million, compared with
$1.01 billion in 1993. Case revenues were down in 1994 compared to 1993 due to
the sale of Case prior to the IPO in June 1994. Automotive parts revenues were
$1.85 billion, a $222 million or 14 percent increase, compared with 1993
primarily due to improved sales in both the aftermarket and original equipment
market. Revenues for shipbuilding decreased to $1.75 billion, or six percent,
due to a drop in carrier and submarine construction work and the fourth quarter
1993 divestiture of Sperry Marine. Packaging revenues increased $142 million,
or seven percent, to $2.18 billion in 1994, as prices in the containerboard
business recovered from the seven-year low reached in the third quarter of
1993.
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST EXPENSE, INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST (OPERATING
INCOME)
Operating income was $1,221 million for 1994. This was a decrease of $20
million over 1993's operating income of $1,241 million. Excluding gains and
losses from asset sales and other special items including plant consolidations,
1994 operating income increased $119 million, or 10 percent, compared with 1993
primarily due to improved pricing in packaging's containerboard business and
higher sales volumes in the automotive parts segment.
NATURAL GAS PIPELINES
REVENUES
Revenues for natural gas pipelines decreased $484 million to $2,378 million
in 1994. This primarily is a result of the implementation of Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission ("FERC") Order 636 during the fall of 1993, which
essentially ended natural gas sales by regulated pipelines. Additionally, the
decline in natural gas prices in 1994 lowered revenues in the nonregulated
segment. Revenues from the regulated businesses decreased $384 million to $918
million in 1994, while revenues from nonregulated businesses decreased
$100 million to $1,460 million in 1994.
OPERATING INCOME
Natural gas pipelines operating income for 1994 was $415 million, compared
with $411 million in 1993. Special items, including gains on asset sales along
with regulatory and litigation settlements, amounted to $34 million in 1994 and
$28 million in 1993. Special items in 1994 included a $23 million gain on the
sale of a 20 percent interest in Tenneco Energy Resources Corporation to
Ruhrgas AG. When non-recurring items in both years are excluded, operating
income in 1994 declined slightly, compared with 1993. Significant growth in the
nonregulated businesses, including an increase in Tenneco Ventures' operating
income, was offset by declines in the regulated business caused by implementing
Order 636.
OUTLOOK
Tenneco Gas' strategy for future growth is to utilize its regulated pipelines
to provide a substantial base of income as well as monetize non-strategic
assets and redeploy those resources into more profitable, nonregulated
businesses. During 1994, Tenneco Gas achieved record transportation volumes in
both its regulated and nonregulated pipelines, and plans to continue
maintaining its market strength in the future. Tenneco Gas' regulated pipelines
moved to expand its markets by proposing to build the 350-mile Mid-Atlantic
Pipeline. In addition, Tenneco Gas has committed approximately one-half of its
capital budget for 1995 to investments in the nonregulated businesses, compared
with three percent in 1992. Also, during 1994,
20
<PAGE>
Tenneco Gas was chosen to participate in constructing a pipeline from Bolivia
to Brazil and to conduct final feasibility studies for an offshore pipeline in
Taiwan. Tenneco Gas also was selected by the government of Queensland,
Australia, to develop, own and operate a 470-mile, $170 million pipeline, which
is expected to be on-line in 1996. In addition, Tenneco Gas is engaged in a
feasibility study for the construction, ownership, and operation of a 750-mile
pipeline from Argentina to Chile.
In October 1994, Tenneco Gas announced the acquisition of ARK Energy, Inc., a
privately-owned power generation company, for approximately $60 million in
Tenneco Inc. common stock and other consideration. Tenneco Gas is scheduled to
complete the acquisition by midyear 1995.
On December 30, 1994, the Company filed a general rate increase in Docket No.
RP95-112 which reflected an increase in the Company's revenue requirement of
$118 million, including recovery of certain environmental costs. On January 25,
1995, the FERC accepted the filing, suspended its effectiveness for the maximum
period of five months pursuant to normal regulatory process, and set the matter
for hearing. This order also required the convening of a technical conference
to address various concerns raised by the FERC and the Company's customers
over, among other issues, the Company's ability to provide its shippers with
timely and accurate operating and billing information and the associated
systems costs. The ultimate resolution of these issues may result in
adjustments to customer billings. Subject to the outcome of these issues and
certain modifications identified in the FERC order, the increased rates will
become effective on July 1, 1995, subject to refund. (Reference is made to Note
15, "Commitments and Contingencies--Environmental Matters," in the "Notes to
Financial Statements" for additional information.)
AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
REVENUES
Revenues for automotive parts increased to $1,850 million in 1994 from $1,628
million in 1993 because of increased sales in both the aftermarket and original
equipment market. Major North American promotion efforts in support of Monroe's
new Sensa-Trac product were a big factor in the revenue increase in the
worldwide replacement market for ride control products.
Increased new car and truck production in North America contributed to the
increase in worldwide original equipment sales. European revenues improved 19
percent as the economy rebounded from the recession.
OPERATING INCOME
Automotive parts operating income for 1994 was $205 million, compared with
$198 million in 1993. The 1994 operating income included a $17 million charge
for plant consolidations in Europe associated with acquiring Heinrich Gillet
GmbH & Company ("Gillet") in Germany and a $5 million charge taken in the
second quarter for closing a plant in Ohio. Excluding special items, operating
income increased $29 million, or 15 percent, compared with 1993. This increase
is a result of higher volumes in North America and Europe and was partially
offset by higher costs for new product development and new facility start-up.
In November 1994, Tenneco announced that its Tenneco Automotive subsidiary
completed the acquisition of Gillet for $44 million in cash and $69 million in
assumed debt. Gillet is the leading manufacturer of original equipment exhaust
systems and components for European auto makers.
As part of the European consolidation plan, Tennessee consolidated the
headquarters and engineering center in Europe with the Gillet facilities in the
first quarter of 1995. The manufacturing facilities consolidation will occur
later in 1995.
21
<PAGE>
OUTLOOK
The Gillet acquisition added to Tenneco Automotive's global manufacturing and
engineering network. It also brought many new original equipment customers and
orders to Walker, making it the market share leader in the European original
equipment exhaust market.
Tenneco Automotive's future growth will also come from new product
introductions. Sensa-Trac shocks and struts were introduced in North America,
France, and Australia in 1994 with immediate positive customer response. In
1995 Sensa-Trac products will be introduced in South America and the rest of
Europe.
PACKAGING
REVENUES
Revenues for the packaging segment increased to $2,184 million in 1994 from
$2,042 million in 1993. Containerboard prices improved significantly, and
Packaging achieved record productivity levels despite tightening supply
conditions. Revenues from the containerboard business were up 11 percent to
$1,529 million in 1994 while revenues from the specialty business were
essentially flat.
OPERATING INCOME
Packaging's operating income for 1994 was $209 million, compared with $139
million in 1993. The 1993 operating income included $29 million from gains
related to asset realignment. Excluding these gains, operating income increased
$99 million, or 90 percent, compared with 1993 primarily because of improved
containerboard pricing.
The containerboard business earned $139 million, up $104 million compared
with 1993, excluding the 1993 asset realignment gains. Prices rose from
depressed levels in 1993 and contributed $125 million, excluding the recycling
business, of increased operating income. This was partially offset by higher
raw material costs of $32 million, but improved productivity helped counter
rising raw material costs. Containerboard productivity rose 1.6 percent, with
mill operating rates exceeding rated capacity for the full year.
The specialty business operating income for 1994 declined $5 million to $70
million, excluding the asset realignment gains in 1993. Both the aluminum and
plastic packaging businesses reported improved operating income. Plastic
packaging volumes grew seven percent in 1994 and demand continues to be strong.
Operating income for plastics rose 40 percent in 1994, reflecting increased
volumes and higher pricing. The increase in operating income provided by the
aluminum and plastic businesses was more than offset by weak performance in the
molded fiber business, where higher raw material costs had a negative effect on
operating income. Prices for recycled newspaper, a major raw material for
molded fiber, rose to over $100 per ton, compared with $26 per ton in 1993.
OUTLOOK
Containerboard production increased six percent throughout the industry in
1994 and, with industry inventory levels at less than four weeks' supply in
December, Packaging expects demand to remain strong in 1995. Despite strong
demand overseas, export shipments during the fourth quarter of 1994 dropped
sharply, as producers worked to meet domestic demand. Packaging expects both
domestic and export demand to remain strong in 1995, and combined with limited
capacity additions, this should keep industry production at or near capacity.
In October 1994, Tenneco announced a $73 million upgrade at the Counce,
Tennessee, mill. This upgrade should be completed by the end of the second
quarter of 1996 and increase production capacity by
22
<PAGE>
120,000 tons annually. The upgrade will allow production of lighter weight
linerboard with higher recycled content and a smoother surface suitable for
higher quality printing.
The specialty business also offers opportunities for growth and higher
margins. The aluminum foil container market is growing at four percent per
year, and the plastic food service business has expanded at five to eight
percent per year over the past five years, a pace Packaging expects to
continue. To take advantage of these growth markets, Packaging is aggressively
managing its costs, developing new products and adding capacity as required.
Packaging also consistently reviews acquisition candidates, both domestic and
foreign, for additional sources of growth.
SHIPBUILDING
REVENUES
Revenues for shipbuilding of $1,753 million in 1994 were six percent below
revenues of $1,861 million in 1993. This decrease was due to the 1993
divestiture of Sperry Marine and lower volumes on carrier and submarine work.
OPERATING INCOME
Shipbuilding's operating income for 1994 was $200 million compared with $225
million in 1993. Special items in 1993 included a $15 million gain on the sale
of Sperry Marine and a $12 million benefit from recovering a portion of the
postretirement benefit costs reserve that was established when Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 106 was adopted in 1992. If these
special items were excluded, operating income increased $2 million in 1994 on
revenues that were six percent lower due to aggressive efforts to improve
productivity and control costs.
OUTLOOK
Shipbuilding will continue to seek U.S. Navy work, but at the same time will
focus more on the large, global commercial and military markets. The target is
for Navy work to provide 60 percent of total revenues by 1999, with 40 percent
coming from commercial and international military sectors. U.S. Navy work was
more than 90 percent of total revenues for 1994. Newport News is making capital
investments in support of its efforts to capture future U.S. Navy work and its
expansion into commercial and international military markets, and to improve
its productivity. Major investments now underway include substantial
modifications to its steel production capability to achieve world class
efficiency, expansion of Dry Dock 12 (already the largest in the western
hemisphere) and construction of a consolidated nuclear powered ship refueling
facility.
The backlog at the end of 1994 was $5.6 billion, compared with $3.7 billion
at the end of 1993. The next aircraft carrier, RONALD REAGAN (CVN-76), a
defueling and deactivation contract for the nuclear cruiser LONG BEACH, and two
"Double Eagle" product tankers were added to the backlog in 1994. Newport News
became the first American shipyard since 1957 to obtain a commercial
construction contract from a foreign shipowner with the export order for two
"Double Eagle" product tankers, with an option for two more. The shipyard is
also a finalist for the possible sale of two to six fast frigates to the United
Arab Emirates.
In addition to the three new projects mentioned above, the 1994 backlog
included four LOS ANGELES-class submarines, two NIMITZ-class aircraft carriers
(JOHN C. STENNIS and HARRY S. TRUMAN) and the SEALIFT conversion contract
involving two ships. In addition, Newport News has ongoing engineering
contracts as the lead design yard for the LOS ANGELES-class and SEAWOLF-class
submarines. Newport News also has contracts to plan upcoming overhauls for the
carriers EISENHOWER and ROOSEVELT. Subject to new orders, this existing backlog
will decline as two submarines per year, on average, are delivered through
1996, and the aircraft carriers are delivered in 1995, 1998 and 2002.
23
<PAGE>
FARM AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
In 1994 Tenneco reduced its ownership in Case to approximately 44 percent, of
which Tennessee now owns approximately two percent, through an initial public
offering in June and a secondary public offering of Case's stock in November.
As a result, the method of reporting Case's financial results changed in July
1994 to the cost method of accounting. In the months of January through June,
Tennessee recorded 100 percent of Case's revenues, operating income, interest
expense and taxes. (For additional information, see "1994 Strategic Actions"
above and Notes 1 and 3, "Control and Summary of Accounting Policies" and
"Discontinued Operations, Disposition of Assets and Extraordinary Loss," in the
"Notes to Financial Statements".)
REVENUES
Revenues for Case decreased to $518 million in 1994 from $1,014 million in
1993 primarily due to the sale of Case. Revenues for Case included only the
first six months of 1994 because of Tennessee's sale of its farm and
construction equipment net assets prior to the IPO that was completed in June
1994.
OPERATING INCOME
Case reported an operating loss of $1 million in 1994, compared with an
operating loss of $13 million reported in 1993, excluding the 1993 reduction of
restructuring charges of $62 million. The $12 million improvement in 1994
results (excluding the 1993 restructuring charge reduction) was due to
improving conditions in European markets.
OUTLOOK
Tenneco intends to review its ownership position of Case periodically and may
consider future dispositions through sales of shares through public or private
offerings, through dividends or distributions to its stockholders, or
otherwise. Any such future dispositions will depend upon a number of factors,
including existing market conditions and the tax consequences of the
transactions in question.
OTHER
Tennessee's other operations reported operating income of $193 million in
1994, compared with $219 million for 1993. Other operating income is primarily
attributable to affiliated interest income. The decrease in operating income is
due primarily to the 1994 loss of $68 million from the Case reorganization and
initial and secondary public offerings.
INTEREST EXPENSE (NET OF INTEREST CAPITALIZED)
Net interest incurred declined $13 million from $278 million in 1993 to $265
million in 1994. The decrease was a result of lower debt levels, continued
emphasis on managing for cash flow and working capital and changing Case
reporting to the cost method in July 1994. Interest capitalized increased to $4
million in 1994 from $3 million in 1993 due to higher levels of major capital
projects.
Finance charges (interest expense related to finance subsidiaries classified
as an operating expense) were $7 million in 1994 versus $22 million in 1993.
This lower expense was due to lower average debt levels resulting from the Case
reorganization and IPO.
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for 1994 was $290 million versus $329 million reported for
1993. The decrease in tax expense in 1994 was from lower pre-tax income and tax
benefits from the realization of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets
resulting from consolidation of Tennessee's German operations and the sale of
businesses. (Reference is made to Note 7 "Income Taxes," in the "Notes to
Financial Statements" for additional information.)
24
<PAGE>
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND EXTRAORDINARY LOSS
Loss from discontinued operations in 1994 of $162 million, net of income tax
expense of $118 million, resulted from the sale of Tennessee's chemicals and
brakes businesses. The loss of $191 million, net of $103 million income tax
expense, on the sale of these businesses included a $166 million loss, net of
income tax expense of $117 million, from the sale of the chemicals business,
and a $25 million loss from the sale of the brakes business, net of income tax
benefit of $14 million. Net income from the chemicals operations in 1994 was
$32 million, net of income tax expense of $19 million. Net loss in 1994 from
the brakes operations was $3 million, net of income tax benefit of $4 million.
Income from discontinued operations in 1993 of $59 million, net of income tax
expense of $12 million, was attributable to the sale of Tennessee's brakes
business and chemical operations in 1994. Net loss for 1993 for the brakes
business was $4 million, net of income tax benefit of $3 million. Net income
for the chemicals business was $63 million, net of income tax expense of $15
million.
Extraordinary loss for 1993 was $24 million, net of income tax benefit of $12
million. This was the result of redemption premiums from prepaying high
interest-bearing long-term debt. (Reference is made to Note 3 "Discontinued
Operations, Disposition of Assets and Extraordinary Loss," in the "Notes to
Financial Statements" for additional information regarding these discontinued
operations.)
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
Effective January 1, 1994, Tennessee adopted FAS No. 112, "Employers'
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits." This new standard was adopted using
the cumulative catch-up method and requires employers to account for
postemployment benefits for former or inactive employees after employment but
before retirement on the accrual basis rather than the "pay-as-you-go" basis.
As a result of adopting this statement, the 1994 Statement of Income (Loss)
reflected an after-tax charge of $13 million for the cumulative effect of the
accounting change. (Reference is made to Note 1, "Control and Summary of
Accounting Policies--Changes in Accounting Principles," in the "Notes to
Financial Statements" for additional information.)
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Expenditures for plant, property and equipment from continuing operations for
1994 were $650 million, compared with $431 million for 1993. Increased
expenditures for natural gas pipelines ($161 million), automotive parts ($17
million), packaging ($42 million) and other ($13 million) were partially offset
by declines for farm and construction equipment ($7 million) and shipbuilding
($7 million). (See Note 13, "Segment and Geographic Area Information," in the
"Notes to Financial Statements" for a complete breakdown of capital
expenditures by operating segment.)
FERC MATTERS
The Company has deferred certain costs associated with renegotiating gas
supply contracts as a result of FERC Order 636 ("GSR costs"). The amount to be
recovered from its customers is approximately $177 million, net of $187 million
previously collected subject to refund, at December 31, 1994. Proceedings have
commenced to review the recovery of these GSR costs; however, the FERC has also
generally encouraged pipelines to settle such issues through negotiations with
customers. Although Order 636 contemplates complete recovery by pipelines of
qualified transition costs, the Company has initiated settlement discussions
with its customers concerning the amount of recoverable GSR costs in response
to recent FERC and customer statements acknowledging the desirability of such
settlements. The Company is also engaged in separate settlement and contract
reformation discussions with holders of certain gas purchase contracts who have
sued the Company, although the Company believes that its defenses in the
underlying gas purchase contract actions are meritorious.
25
<PAGE>
In connection with the Company's GSR cost recovery, the Company, along with
three other pipelines, executed four separate settlement agreements with Dakota
Gasification Company and the U.S. Department of Energy and initiated four
separate proceedings at the FERC seeking approval to implement the settlement
agreements. The settlement resolved litigation concerning purchases made by the
Company of synthetic gas produced from the Great Plains Coal Gasification plant
("Great Plains"). On October 18, 1994, the FERC consolidated the four
proceedings and set them for hearing before an administrative law judge who is
to issue his initial decision by December 31, 1995. The FERC has committed to a
final order by December 31, 1996. The FERC order stated that the costs related
to the Great Plains project are eligible for recovery through GSR and other
special recovery mechanisms and that the costs are eligible for recovery for
the duration of the term of the original gas purchase agreements. The hearing
will be limited to the issue of whether the settlement agreements are prudent.
Also in connection with the Company's GSR cost recovery proceedings, on
October 14, 1993, the Company was sued in the State District Court of Ector
County, Texas, by ICA Energy, Inc. ("ICA") and TransTexas Gas Corporation
("TransTexas"). In that suit, ICA and TransTexas contended that the Company had
an obligation to purchase gas production which TransTexas thereafter attempted
to add unilaterally to the reserves originally dedicated to a 1979 gas
contract. On two subsequent occasions, TransTexas gave the Company notice that
it was adding new production and/or acreage "to the contract." An amendment to
the pleadings seeks $1.5 billion from the Company for alleged damages caused by
the Company's refusal to purchase gas produced from the TransTexas leases
covering the new production and lands. Neither ICA nor TransTexas were original
parties to that contract. However, they contend that any stranger acquiring a
fractional interest in the original committed reserves thereby obtains a right
to add to the contract unlimited volumes of gas production from locations in
South Texas. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims of
ICA and TransTexas, which defenses it will vigorously assert.
Given the uncertainty over the results of ongoing discussions between the
Company and its customers related to the recovery of GSR costs and the
uncertainty related to predicting the outcome of its gas purchase contract
reformation efforts and the associated litigation, Tennessee is unable to
predict the timing or the ultimate impact the resolution of these issues will
have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Following issuance of the final order by the FERC approving the Company's
partial settlement of its 1991 rate case, the Company has made refunds to its
customers of approximately $200 million in February 1995 related to rates
collected since September 1, 1993, to October 31, 1994. (Reference is made to
Note 6, "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") Regulatory Matters," in
the "Notes to Financial Statements" for additional information.)
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Expenditures for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that
relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.
Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and
that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed.
Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments indicate that remedial
efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of
the liability are based upon currently available facts, existing technology,
and presently enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration the likely
effects of inflation and other societal and economic factors. All available
evidence is considered, including prior experience in remediation of
contaminated sites, other companies' cleanup experience, and data released by
the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") or other
organizations. These liabilities are included in the balance sheet at their
undiscounted amounts. Recoveries are evaluated separately from the liability
and, when recovery is assured, are recorded separately from the associated
liability in the financial statements.
26
<PAGE>
The Company is a party in proceedings involving federal and state authorities
regarding the past use by the Company of a lubricant containing polychlorinated
biphenyls ("PCBs") in its starting air systems.
The Company has executed a consent order with the EPA governing the
remediation of its compressor stations in Regions IV, V and VI. With respect to
the stations in Regions II and III, EPA has advised the Company that it is
deferring to the Pennsylvania and New York environmental agencies to specify
the remediation requirements applicable to the Company. The Company anticipates
that it will soon reach an agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources ("PaDER") and will enter into a consent order on
remediation at the Pennsylvania stations (under which the Company also agrees
to pay a civil penalty and, in addition, to make a contribution for
environmental projects); meanwhile, the Company will continue its negotiations
with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation on remediation at
the New York stations. Tennessee believes that the ultimate resolution of this
matter will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or
results of operations of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. (See
Note 6, "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") Regulatory Matters" in
the "Notes to Financial Statements" for additional information.)
A subsidiary of the Company owns a 13.2% general partnership interest in
Iroquois Gas Transmission Systems, L.P. ("Iroquois"), which owns an interstate
natural gas pipeline from the Canadian border through the states of New York
and Connecticut to Long Island. The operator of the pipeline is Iroquois
Pipeline Operating Company ("the Operator"), a subsidiary of TransCanada
Pipelines, Ltd., an affiliate of TransCanada Iroquois, Ltd. which is also a
partner in Iroquois.
In early 1992, Iroquois was informed by U.S. Attorney's Offices for the
Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of New York that a civil
investigation had been initiated to determine whether civil environmental
violations occurred during construction of the pipeline. In February 1992, 26
alleged violations were identified to Iroquois in writing. In response,
Iroquois denied that such violations had occurred and asserted that all
concerns raised by governmental authorities during construction had been fully
addressed. Iroquois subsequently was informed that the alleged violations
included certain matters referred to in field reports prepared by a
Federal/State Inter-Agency Task Force which surveyed the right-of-way in
connection with the right-of-way restoration program. Iroquois responded to the
appropriate U.S. Attorneys' Offices that none of the matters referenced in
field reports issued to date represent violations of any law or governmental
authorization. As of March 28, 1995, no proceedings in connection with this
civil investigation have been commenced against Iroquois by the federal
government.
On December 3, 1993, Iroquois received notification from the Enforcement
Staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Office of the General
Counsel ("Enforcement") that Enforcement has commenced a preliminary, non-
public investigation concerning the construction of certain of Iroquois'
pipeline facilities. That office has requested certain information regarding
such construction. In addition, on December 27, 1993, Iroquois received a
similar request for information from the Army Corps of Engineers requesting
certain information regarding permit compliance in connection with certain
aspects of the pipeline's construction. By a notice issued on February 6, 1995,
the Public Service Commission of the State of New York (the "NYPSC") also has
requested Iroquois to respond to certain allegations set out in a petition
filed by GASP Coalition and Anne Marie Mueser in January 1995 with the NYPSC
requesting an investigation by the NYPSC of aspects of the construction of the
pipeline. Iroquois has been evaluating and responding to these agencies'
requests for information. No proceedings have been commenced against Iroquois
in connection with these agency inquiries.
A criminal investigation relating to the construction of the pipeline
facilities has been initiated by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern
District of New York in conjunction with the EPA and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation ("FBI"). According to a press release issued by the FBI in June
1992, areas under investigation include possible environmental violations, wire
fraud, mail fraud and providing false information or concealment of information
from federal agencies in conjunction with construction of the pipeline. While
27
<PAGE>
no criminal charges have been filed to date, counsel for Iroquois and counsel
for the Operator have met with the Assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the
investigation and plan to meet with him again in the near future in order to
discuss the issues under investigation and to explore the possibility of a
negotiated resolution of the issues raised in the criminal, civil and
administrative inquiries (a "global resolution"). In the absence of a
negotiated resolution, Iroquois deems it probable that the U.S. Attorney will
seek indictments and, in them, substantial fines and other sanctions.
As a general partner, the Company's subsidiary may be jointly and severally
liable with the other partners for the liabilities of Iroquois. The Company has
a contract to provide gas dispatching as well as post-construction field
operation and maintenance services for the Operator of Iroquois, but the
Company is not the Operator and is not an affiliate of the Operator. Moreover,
the foregoing proceedings and investigations have not affected pipeline
operations. Based upon information available to the Company at March 28, 1995,
Tennessee believes that neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a
target of the criminal investigation described above. Further, while a global
resolution of these inquiries could have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of Iroquois, Tennessee believes that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
At December 31, 1994, Tennessee has been designated as a potentially
responsible party in 66 "Superfund" sites. With respect to its pro rata share
of the remediation costs of certain sites, Tennessee is fully indemnified by
third parties. With respect to certain other sites, Tennessee has sought to
resolve its liability through payments to the other potentially responsible
parties. For the remaining sites, Tennessee has estimated its share of
remediation costs to be between $13 million and $72 million or 0.4% to 2.2% of
the total remediation costs for those sites and has provided reserves that it
believes are adequate for such costs. Because the cleanup costs are estimates
and are subject to revision as more information becomes available about the
extent of remediation required, Tennessee's estimate of its share of
remediation costs could change. Moreover, liability under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act is joint and several,
meaning that Tennessee could be required to pay in excess of its pro rata share
of remediation costs. Tennessee's understanding of the financial strength of
other potentially responsible parties has been considered, where appropriate,
in Tennessee's determination of its estimated liability. Tennessee does not
believe that the costs associated with its current status as a potentially
responsible party in the Superfund sites described above will be material to
its financial position or results of operations. (For further information,
reference is made to Note 15, "Commitments and Contingencies--Environmental
Matters," in the "Notes to Financial Statements.")
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of independent public accountants.................................. 29
Statements of income (loss) for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1994.................................................. 30
Balance sheets--December 31, 1994 and 1993................................ 31
Statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1994........................................................ 33
Statements of changes in stockholder's equity for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1994.................................... 34
Notes to financial statements............................................. 35
</TABLE>
28
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tenneco Inc.)
and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and consolidated subsidiaries as of December
31, 1994 and 1993, and the related statements of income (loss), cash flows and
changes in stockholder's equity for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1994. These financial statements and the schedule referred to
below are the responsibility of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and consolidated subsidiaries as of December
31, 1994 and 1993, and the results of their operations, cash flows and changes
in stockholder's equity for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
As more fully discussed in Note 6 to the financial statements, Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company is a party to litigation, the outcome of which impacts its
ongoing customer settlement discussions over the recoverability of its contract
reformation costs. The ultimate outcome of the litigation and the extent of its
recoverability cannot be presently determined. Accordingly, no provisions for
the resolution of these matters have been made in the accompanying financial
statements.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, effective January 1, 1994,
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company changed its method of accounting for
postemployment benefits. Also as discussed in Note 1 to the financial
statements, effective January 1, 1992, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company changed
its methods of accounting for income taxes and postretirement benefits other
than pensions.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental schedule listed in the
index to Part IV, Item 14 relating to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and
consolidated subsidiaries is presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic
financial statements. The supplemental schedule has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements
of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and consolidated subsidiaries taken as a
whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Houston, Texas
February 16, 1995
29
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
----------------------
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Net sales and operating revenues--
Natural gas pipelines.............................. $2,378 $2,862 $2,183
Farm and construction equipment.................... 518 1,014 1,256
Automotive parts................................... 1,850 1,628 1,616
Shipbuilding....................................... 1,753 1,861 2,265
Packaging.......................................... 2,184 2,042 2,078
Other.............................................. (7) (7) (4)
------ ------ ------
8,676 9,400 9,394
Other income--
Interest income
Affiliated companies............................. 251 215 261
Other............................................ 38 26 44
Gain (loss) on sale of businesses and assets, net.. (61) 112 --
Gain on the sale by a subsidiary of its stock...... 23 -- --
Other income, net.................................. 29 32 38
------ ------ ------
8,956 9,785 9,737
------ ------ ------
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation shown be-
low)................................................ 4,901 5,253 5,775
Operating expenses................................... 1,880 2,265 1,628
Selling, general and administrative.................. 640 688 665
Finance charges of Tennessee's finance subsidiaries.. 7 22 62
Depreciation, depletion and amortization............. 307 378 379
Restructuring costs.................................. -- (62) 241
------ ------ ------
7,735 8,544 8,750
------ ------ ------
Income Before Interest Expense, Income Taxes and Minor-
ity Interest.......................................... 1,221 1,241 987
------ ------ ------
Interest Expense (net of interest capitalized):
Affiliated companies................................. 101 66 46
Other................................................ 164 212 312
------ ------ ------
265 278 358
------ ------ ------
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest....... 956 963 629
Income Tax Expense..................................... 290 329 325
------ ------ ------
Income Before Minority Interest........................ 666 634 304
Minority Interest...................................... 1 -- --
------ ------ ------
Income From Continuing Operations...................... 665 634 304
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations, Net of In-
come Tax.............................................. (162) 59 134
------ ------ ------
Income Before Extraordinary Loss....................... 503 693 438
Extraordinary Loss, Net of Income Tax.................. -- (24) (9)
------ ------ ------
Income Before Cumulative Effect of Changes in
Accounting Principles................................. 503 669 429
Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principles,
Net of Income Tax..................................... (13) -- (436)
------ ------ ------
Net Income (Loss)...................................... $ 490 $ 669 $ (7)
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
statements of income (loss).)
30
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
DECEMBER 31,
---------------
ASSETS 1994 1993
------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments.......................... $ 459 $ 220
Receivables--
Customer notes and accounts (net).......................... 644 783
Affiliated companies....................................... 297 716
Gas transportation and exchange............................ 214 228
Other...................................................... 164 88
Notes receivable from Tenneco Inc............................ 3,201 745
Inventories.................................................. 909 932
Deferred income taxes........................................ 43 26
Prepayments and other........................................ 301 321
------- -------
6,232 4,059
------- -------
Investments and Other Assets:
Investment in affiliated companies........................... 523 410
Other investments, at cost................................... 49 60
Long-term notes and other receivables (net).................. 157 221
Notes receivable from other affiliates....................... -- 1,770
Investment in subsidiaries in excess of fair value of net
assets at date of acquisition, less amortization............ 329 273
Deferred income taxes........................................ 49 38
Other........................................................ 733 901
------- -------
1,840 3,673
------- -------
Plant, Property and Equipment, at cost......................... 11,009 10,345
Less--Reserves for depreciation, depletion and amortization.. 5,851 5,573
------- -------
5,158 4,772
------- -------
$13,230 $12,504
======= =======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
balance sheets.)
31
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY 1994 1993
------------------------------------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Liabilities:
Short-term debt (including current maturities on long-term
debt)..................................................... $ 298 $ 121
Payables--
Trade.................................................... 1,029 1,010
Affiliated companies..................................... 244 258
Gas transportation and exchange.......................... 159 136
Taxes accrued.............................................. 49 218
Interest accrued........................................... 37 43
Restructuring liability.................................... -- 95
Natural gas pipeline revenue reservation................... 190 291
Other...................................................... 787 815
------- -------
2,793 2,987
------- -------
Long-term Debt............................................... 793 1,086
------- -------
Deferred Income Taxes........................................ 1,408 1,262
------- -------
Postretirement Benefits...................................... 380 417
------- -------
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities....................... 422 404
------- -------
Commitments and Contingencies
Minority Interest............................................ 475 2
------- -------
Stockholder's Equity:
Common stock, par value $5 per share, authorized, issued
and outstanding 200 shares................................ -- --
Premium on common stock and other capital surplus.......... 3,494 3,494
Cumulative translation adjustments......................... (174) (297)
Retained earnings.......................................... 3,639 3,149
------- -------
6,959 6,346
------- -------
$13,230 $12,504
======= =======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
balance sheets.)
32
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
-----------------------
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Activities:
Income from continuing operations................... $ 665 $ 634 $ 304
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing
operations to net cash provided (used) by
continuing operations--
Depreciation, depletion and amortization.......... 307 378 379
Deferred income taxes............................. 28 28 (393)
(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets, net. 38 (112) --
Changes in components of working capital--
(Increase) decrease in receivables.............. 551 236 200
(Increase) decrease in inventories.............. (139) 44 110
(Increase) decrease in prepayments and other
current assets................................. 10 23 16
Increase (decrease) in payables................. 25 (167) (257)
Increase (decrease) in taxes accrued............ (151) (22) 91
Increase (decrease) in interest accrued......... (17) (29) (20)
Increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.. (5) (85) (72)
Increase (decrease) in natural gas pipeline
revenue reservation............................ (91) 136 144
Increase (decrease) in other current
liabilities.................................... (9) (18) 101
(Increase) decrease in long-term notes and
receivables...................................... 1 3 34
Take-or-pay (refunds to customers) recoupments,
net.............................................. 26 (34) 92
Other............................................. (29) (53) 72
------ ------ -------
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations..... 1,210 962 801
Cash provided (used) by discontinued operations... 36 23 (47)
------ ------ -------
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities...... 1,246 985 754
------ ------ -------
Investing Activities:
Net proceeds (expenditures) related to the sale of
discontinued operations............................ (17) (54) 653
Net proceeds from sale of businesses and assets..... 301 249 105
Expenditures for plant, property and equipment--
Continuing operations............................. (650) (431) (448)
Discontinued operations........................... (67) (62) (88)
Acquisitions of businesses.......................... (51) (33) (10)
(Increase) decrease in Tenneco Inc. receivables..... (2,456) 472 357
(Increase) decrease in notes receivable from other
affiliates......................................... 1,770 151 (280)
Investments and other............................... 91 (24) 16
------ ------ -------
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities...... (1,079) 268 305
------ ------ -------
Financing Activities:
Capital contribution from Tenneco Inc............... -- -- 100
Issuance of equity securities by a subsidiary....... 294 -- --
Issuance of long-term debt.......................... -- 3 --
Retirement of long-term debt........................ (156) (977) (637)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt excluding
current maturities on long-term debt............... (70) (163) (474)
Dividends........................................... -- -- (75)
------ ------ -------
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities...... 68 (1,137) (1,086)
------ ------ -------
Effect of Foreign Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and
Temporary Cash Investments........................... 4 (4) (18)
------ ------ -------
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Temporary Cash
Investments.......................................... 239 112 (45)
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments, January 1........ 220 108 153
------ ------ -------
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments, December 31
(Note)............................................... $ 459 $ 220 $ 108
====== ====== =======
Cash Paid During the Year for Interest................ $ 284 $ 330 $ 440
Cash Paid During the Year for Income Taxes (net of
refunds)............................................. $ 427 $ 334 $ 862
</TABLE>
--------
NOTE: Cash and temporary cash investments include highly liquid investments
with a maturity of three months or less at date of purchase.
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
statements of cash flows.)
33
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------
1994 1993 1992
------------- ------------- -------------
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock:
Balance January 1 and December
31............................. 200 $ -- 200 $ -- 200 $ --
=== ------ === ------ === ------
Premium on Common Stock and Other
Capital Surplus:
Balance January 1............... 3,494 3,494 3,394
Capital contribution from
Tenneco Inc.................. -- -- 100
------ ------ ------
Balance December 31............. 3,494 3,494 3,494
------ ------ ------
Cumulative Translation
Adjustments:
Balance January 1............... (297) (218) (26)
Translation of foreign
currency statements.......... 124 (83) (211)
Hedges of net investment in
foreign subsidiaries (net of
income taxes)................ (1) 4 19
------ ------ ------
Balance December 31............. (174) (297) (218)
------ ------ ------
Retained Earnings:
Balance January 1............... 3,149 2,480 2,562
Net income (loss)............. 490 669 (7)
Dividends..................... -- -- (75)
------ ------ ------
Balance December 31............. 3,639 3,149 2,480
------ ------ ------
Total....................... $6,959 $6,346 $5,756
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
statements of changes in stockholder's equity.)
34
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) CONTROL AND SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Control
All of the outstanding common stock of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the
"Company") is owned by Tenneco Inc. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and
consolidated subsidiaries ("Tennessee") are thus members of an operating group
under the control of Tenneco Inc. As such, Tennessee engages in transactions
characteristic of group administration and operation with other members of the
group.
Consolidation and Presentation
The financial statements of Tennessee include all majority-owned subsidiaries
including wholly-owned finance subsidiaries. Companies in which at least a 20%
to a 50% voting interest is owned are carried at cost plus equity in
undistributed earnings since date of acquisition (except for Tennessee's Farm
and construction equipment segment as noted below) and cumulative translation
adjustments. At December 31, 1994, equity in undistributed earnings and
cumulative translation adjustments amounted to $117 million and $(20) million,
respectively; at December 31, 1993, the corresponding amounts were $67 million
and $(27) million, respectively. All significant intercompany transactions have
been eliminated.
Reference is made to Note 8 for summarized financial information of
Tennessee's finance subsidiaries.
In June 1994, Tenneco Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Tenneco") completed an
initial public offering ("IPO") of approximately 29% of the common stock of
Case Corporation ("Case"), the holder of Tenneco's Farm and construction
equipment segment. In November 1994, a secondary offering of Case's common
stock reduced Tenneco's ownership to approximately 44%. Prior to the IPO,
Tenneco reorganized this segment resulting in Tennessee selling all of its Farm
and construction equipment net assets to Case Corporation for consideration of
Case Corporation common stock and cash. From January through June, Tennessee's
Farm and construction equipment segment was fully consolidated; for the last
six months of 1994, it was reflected in Tennessee's financial statements using
the cost method of accounting. Tennessee's remaining investment in Case is not
significant to its consolidated financial position. For further information on
this subject, reference is made to Note 3, "Discontinued Operations,
Disposition of Assets and Extraordinary Loss."
Gains or losses on the sale by a subsidiary of its stock are included in the
Statements of Income (Loss).
Environmental Liabilities
Expenditures for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that
relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.
Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations,
and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are
expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments indicate that
remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
Estimates of the liability are based upon currently available facts, existing
technology and presently enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration
the likely effects of inflation and other societal and economic factors. All
available evidence is considered including prior experience in remediation of
contaminated sites, other companies' cleanup experience and data released by
the Environmental Protection Agency or other organizations. These liabilities
are included in the balance sheet at their undiscounted amounts. Recoveries are
evaluated separately from the liability and, when recovery is assured, are
recorded and reported separately from the associated liability in the financial
statements.
For further information on this subject, reference is made to Note 15,
"Commitments and Contingencies--Environmental Matters."
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation of Tennessee's properties is provided on a straight-line basis
in amounts which, in the opinion of management, are adequate to allocate the
cost of properties over their estimated useful lives.
35
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The excess of investment in subsidiaries over fair value of net assets at
date of acquisition is being amortized over periods ranging from 15 years to 40
years. Such amortization relative to continuing operations amounted to $9
million, $10 million and $5 million for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively, and
is included in the income statement caption, "Other income, net."
Revenue Recognition
Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company ("Newport News"), a wholly-
owned subsidiary, reports profits on its long-term shipbuilding contracts on
the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, determined on the basis of
total costs incurred to date to estimated final total costs. Losses on
contracts are reported when first estimated. The performance of contracts
usually extends over several years, requiring periodic reviews and revisions of
estimated final contract prices and costs during the term of the contracts. The
effect of these revisions is included in income in the period the revisions are
made.
Sales by Case to independent dealers are recorded at the time of shipment to
those dealers. Sales through company-owned retail stores are recorded at the
time of sale to retail customers. Case grants certain sales incentives to
stimulate sales of the farm and construction equipment products to retail
customers. The expense for such incentive programs is recorded at the time of
sale.
Tennessee's other divisions recognize revenue on the accrual method when
title passes to the customer or when the service is performed.
Risk Management Activities
Tennessee has utilized financial instruments for many years to mitigate its
exposure to various risks. Tennessee is currently a party to financial
instruments to hedge its exposure to changes in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates and natural gas prices. These activities are summarized
in the following paragraphs.
Tennessee is a party to various interest rate swaps under which it has agreed
with other parties to pay or receive, at specified intervals, the difference
between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference
to agreed notional principal amounts. The amount paid or received under these
agreements is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.
Tennessee utilizes a combination of forward exchange contracts and
currency/interest rate swaps to hedge the translation effects of its net
investment in certain foreign subsidiaries. The after-tax translation gains
(losses) incurred are included in the balance sheet caption "Cumulative
translation adjustments." Various foreign currency purchase and sale contracts
are also utilized to minimize the transaction effect in the income statement of
exchange rate movement on receivables and payables denominated in foreign
currencies. Tennessee identifies naturally occurring offsetting positions and
then hedges residual exposures.
Tennessee also utilizes various financial instruments to hedge firm
commitments and transactions associated with its natural gas business. Gains
and losses related to hedges are recognized in income when the hedged
transaction occurs. As of December 31, 1994 and 1993, Tennessee's deferred
gains and losses associated with these transactions were not significant.
Changes in Accounting Principles
Effective January 1, 1994, Tennessee adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits." This new accounting rule requires employers to account for
postemployment benefits for former or inactive employees after employment but
before retirement on the accrual basis rather than the "pay-as-you-go" basis.
Tennessee recorded an after-tax charge of $13 million which was reported as a
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.
36
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Tennessee elected early adoption of FAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions," for its domestic operations and
FAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Both standards were adopted
effective January 1, 1992, using the cumulative catch-up method.
Under FAS No. 106, Tennessee is required to accrue the estimated costs of
retiree benefits other than pensions (primarily health care benefits and life
insurance) during the employees' active service period. Prior to 1992,
Tennessee expensed the cost of these benefits as medical and insurance claims
were paid. Tennessee will adopt the new standard for its non-U.S. plans in the
first quarter of 1995 but does not expect that the adoption will have a
material effect on Tennessee's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The adoption of FAS No. 109 changed Tennessee's method of accounting for
income taxes from the deferred method to the liability method. The liability
method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial
statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.
In 1992, Tennessee recorded an after-tax charge of $436 million for the
cumulative effect of the accounting changes consisting of $199 million for FAS
No. 106 and $237 million for FAS No. 109.
Reference is made to Note 7, "Income Taxes," and Note 11, "Postretirement and
Postemployment Benefits," for further information regarding these changes.
Inventories
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, inventory by major classification was as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
----- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods..................................................... $ 333 $ 433
Work in process.................................................... 91 104
Long-term contracts in progress, less progress billings............ 138 66
Raw materials...................................................... 191 180
Materials and supplies............................................. 156 149
----- -----
$ 909 $ 932
===== =====
</TABLE>
A portion of domestic inventories are valued using the "last-in, first-out"
method, which is not in excess of market. All other inventories are valued at
the lower of cost (determined on the "first-in, first-out" ("FIFO") or
"average" methods) or market based on estimated realizable value. If the FIFO
or average method of inventory accounting had been used by Tennessee for all
inventories, inventories would have been $54 million, $47 million and $57
million higher at December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Notes Receivable
Short-term notes receivable of $37 million and $139 million were outstanding
at December 31, 1994 and 1993, respectively. These notes receivable are
presented net of unearned finance charges of $0 and $5 million at December 31,
1994 and 1993, respectively. At December 31, 1994 and 1993, unearned finance
charges related to long-term notes and other receivables were $0 and $4
million, respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Notes Receivable
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, the allowance for doubtful accounts and notes
receivable was $48 million and $66 million, respectively.
37
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Restrictions on Payment of Dividends
At December 31, 1994, under its most restrictive dividend provision contained
in indentures under which certain of its notes and debentures have been issued,
the Company has approximately $2.9 billion of retained earnings available for
the payment of dividends on common stock.
Certain of the Company's subsidiaries have provisions under financing
arrangements and statutory requirements which limit the amount of their
retained earnings available for dividends. The restriction of the ability to
pay dividends by such subsidiaries would not affect the amount of retained
earnings of the Company available for dividends on common stock.
Reclassifications
Prior years' financial statements have been reclassified where appropriate to
conform to 1994 presentations.
(2) ACQUISITIONS
On October 6, 1994, Tenneco announced that Tenneco Power Generation Company,
a division of Tenneco Gas, signed a letter of intent to complete the
acquisition of ARK Energy, Inc., for approximately $60 million in Tenneco Inc.
common stock and other consideration. The acquisition is expected to be
completed by midyear 1995. ARK Energy, Inc. is a privately-owned power
generation company.
On November 30, 1994, Tenneco announced that its Tenneco Automotive
subsidiary completed the acquisition of Heinrich Gillet GmbH & Company for $44
million in cash and $69 million in assumed debt. Heinrich Gillet GmbH & Company
is the leading manufacturer of original equipment exhaust systems and
components for European automakers.
On December 29, 1994, Tenneco International Holding Corp. ("TIHC"), a
majority-owned subsidiary, acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common
stock of Tenneco Canada Inc. from a Tenneco Inc. subsidiary in exchange for
TIHC common stock. Tenneco Canada Inc. primarily manufactures ride control and
exhaust systems. For additional information concerning TIHC, reference is made
to Note 9, "Minority Interest."
(3) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, DISPOSITION OF ASSETS AND EXTRAORDINARY LOSS
Discontinued Operations
In December 1994, Tenneco announced its intent to offer 100% of its Albright
& Wilson chemicals segment in an IPO. The offering was underwritten in the
United Kingdom and was offered primarily in the United Kingdom. Also in 1994,
Tenneco sold its brakes operation.
Net proceeds from the sale of the chemicals operations are expected to be
$707 million when the sale is completed in early March 1995. Proceeds from the
sale of the brakes operations were $17 million. The sales of these discontinued
operations resulted in a loss of $166 million and $25 million, net of income
tax expense (benefit) of $117 million and $(14) million, respectively.
Revenues for the chemicals discontinued operations were $986 million, $914
million and $951 million for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. Net income was
$32 million, $63 million and $57 million, net of income tax expense of $19
million, $15 million and $18 million for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. Net
assets for the chemicals operations were $639 million and $558 million at
December 31, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
Revenues for the brakes discontinued operations were $57 million, $48 million
and $39 million for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. Net loss was $3 million,
$4 million and $4 million, net of income tax benefit of $4 million, $3 million
and $3 million for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. Net assets of the brakes
operations were $61 million at December 31, 1993.
38
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
During 1992, Tennessee sold its minerals and pulp chemicals operations for
proceeds of $500 million and $202 million, respectively. The sales of these
discontinued operations resulted in a gain (loss) of $96 million and $(25)
million, net of income tax expense of $45 million and $0, respectively.
Revenues for the minerals discontinued operations were $55 million for 1992.
Net income was $9 million, net of income tax expense of $5 million for 1992.
Revenues for the pulp chemicals discontinued operations were $54 million for
1992. Net income was $1 million, net of income tax expense of $1 million for
1992.
Disposition of Assets
In June 1994, Tenneco completed an IPO of approximately 29% of the common
stock of Case. In November 1994, a secondary offering of Case common stock
reduced Tenneco's ownership interest in Case to approximately 44%. Tenneco's
combined proceeds from the two transactions was $694 million, net of
commissions and expenses. Prior to the IPO, Tenneco reorganized this segment
resulting in Tennessee selling all of its Farm and construction equipment net
assets to Case Corporation for consideration of Case Corporation common stock
and cash. In connection with the reorganization, IPO and secondary offering,
Tennessee received net proceeds of $204 million and recognized a loss of $33
million, including $35 million of income tax benefit. Although Tennessee
recorded a loss on these transactions, Tenneco in the aggregate recorded a gain
of $36 million, including a $7 million tax benefit.
Tennessee disposed of several other assets and investments during 1994
including a facility, machinery and equipment at its Packaging segment ("PCA")
and facilities and equipment at Case. Proceeds from these dispositions were $56
million resulting in a pre-tax gain of $7 million.
In 1994, Tenneco Energy Resources Corporation, a subsidiary which operates
non-regulated gas marketing and intrastate pipeline businesses, issued 50
shares of its common stock diluting Tennessee's ownership in this subsidiary to
80%. Cash proceeds were $41 million resulting in a gain of $23 million. No
taxes were provided on the gain because management expects that the recorded
investment will be recovered in a tax-free manner.
During 1993, Tennessee disposed of a number of assets and investments
including its Newport News' Sperry Marine business; several PCA operations; two
wholly-owned pipeline companies, Viking Gas Transmission Company and Dean
Pipeline Company; and facilities and land of two foreign Case operations. The
proceeds from dispositions were $249 million and the pre-tax gain was $112
million.
Extraordinary Loss
In April 1993, the Company's parent, Tenneco Inc., issued 23.5 million shares
of common stock for approximately $1.1 billion, a portion of which was loaned
to the Company and used to retire approximately $688 million of long-term debt.
In November 1993, Tennessee retired DM250 million bonds. The redemption premium
related to the retirement of long-term debt resulting from these two
transactions ($24 million, net of income tax benefits of $12 million) was
recorded as an extraordinary loss.
In December 1992, Tennessee deposited cash with a trustee to defease $310
million of its high interest-bearing long-term debt. Accordingly, this amount
was excluded from long-term debt on the balance sheet at December 31, 1992.
This debt was prepaid in January and February 1993. Tennessee recorded an
extraordinary loss of $9 million (net of income tax benefit of $5 million) for
the redemption premium resulting from this transaction.
39
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(4) LONG-TERM DEBT, SHORT-TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Long-Term Debt
A summary of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 1994 and 1993, is set
forth in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company--
Debentures due 2011, effective interest rate 15.1% in 1994 and
1993 (net of $219 million in 1994 and $222 million in 1993 of
unamortized discount)......................................... $ 181 $ 178
Notes due 1995 through 1997, average effective interest rate
10.1% in 1994 and 1993 (net of $8 million in 1994 and $11
million in 1993 of unamortized discount)...................... 808 805
Tenneco International Finance Ltd.(a)--
Notes due through 1996, average interest rate 5.5%............. -- 123
Other subsidiaries--
Notes due 1995 through 2014, average effective interest rate
8.6% in 1994 and 6.2% in 1993 (net of $20 million in 1994 and
1993 of unamortized discount)................................. 51 24
------ ------
1,040 1,130
Less--Current maturities......................................... 247 44
------ ------
$ 793 $1,086
====== ======
</TABLE>
--------
Note: (a) These notes were prepaid as part of the actions taken pursuant to the
Case IPO.
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, approximately $84 million and $66 million,
respectively, of gross plant, property and equipment was pledged as collateral
to secure $1 million and $1 million, respectively, principal amounts of long-
term debt.
The aggregate maturities and sinking fund requirements applicable to the
issues outstanding at December 31, 1994, are $247 million, $271 million, $327
million, $1 million and $1 million for 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999,
respectively.
Short-Term Debt
Information for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993, regarding lines
of credit, including borrowings under both committed and uncommitted lines of
credit and similar arrangements, follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
----- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding borrowings at end of year............................ $ 42 $ 77
Average interest rate on outstanding borrowings at end of year... 9.8% 7.2%
Approximate maximum month-end outstanding borrowings during year. $ 167 $ 154
Approximate average month-end outstanding borrowings during year. $ 65 $ 121
Weighted average interest rate on approximate average month-end
outstanding borrowings during year.............................. 7.3% 7.4%
</TABLE>
Tennessee had other short-term borrowings of $9 million at December 31, 1994.
Financing Arrangements
Tennessee has arranged $88 million of committed lines of credit ($35 million
of which expire in 1995) with various banks to provide short-term financing
which provide for borrowings at various rates. TIHC has an additional $50
million committed line of credit with Tenneco Credit Corporation, a Tenneco
Inc.
40
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
subsidiary. The credit facilities generally provide for commitment fees on the
unused portion of the total commitment and some credit facilities also provide
for facility fees on the total commitment. In addition, Tennessee has arranged
for $106 million of uncommitted lines of credit.
(5) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values of Tennessee's financial instruments at December
31, 1994 and 1993, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
--------------- ---------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- ------ -------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash and temporary cash investments.......... $ 459 $ 459 $ 220 $ 220
Receivables (customer and long-term)......... 801 801 1,004 1,004
Other investments............................ 41 41 43 43
Short-term debt (excluding current
maturities)................................. 51 51 77 77
Long-term debt (including current maturities
of $247 million and $44 million)............ 1,040 1,175 1,130 1,399
Interest rate swaps:
In a net receivable position............... -- -- -- --
In a net payable position.................. -- (10) -- (78)
Foreign currency contracts receivable
(payable)................................... 1 2 (1) 1
</TABLE>
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
financial instruments:
CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS--Fair value was considered to be the same
as the carrying amount.
RECEIVABLES--Tennessee believes that in the aggregate, the carrying amount of
its receivables, both current and non-current, was not materially different
from the fair value of those receivables. Customer notes and accounts
receivable are concentrated in the Automotive parts (28%), Chemicals (26%) and
Shipbuilding (24%) segments at December 31, 1994. At December 31, 1993,
Tennessee's Farm and construction equipment segment accounted for 36% and its
Shipbuilding segment accounted for 20% of total customer receivables.
OTHER INVESTMENTS--At December 31, 1994, these investments included preferred
stock ($17 million) in Steerage Corporation (the acquiror of Newport News'
Sperry Marine Business) and venture capital investments ($5 million). At
December 31, 1993, these investments included preferred stock ($17 million) in
Steerage Corporation and venture capital investments ($8 million). Because of
the nature of these investments, it was not practicable to estimate their fair
value.
SHORT-TERM DEBT--Fair value was considered to be the same as the carrying
amount.
LONG-TERM DEBT--The fair value of fixed-rate long-term debt was based on the
market value of debt with similar maturities and interest rates; the carrying
amount of floating-rate long-term debt was assumed to approximate its fair
value.
INTEREST RATE SWAPS--The fair value of interest rate swaps was based on the
cost that would have been incurred to buy out those swaps in a loss position
and the consideration that would have been received to terminate those swaps in
a gain position. At December 31, 1994 and 1993, Tennessee was a party to swaps
with a notional value of $750 million and $809 million, respectively, which
were in a net payable position and none which were in a net receivable
position. The amount paid or received on interest rate swap agreements was
recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.
41
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Consistent with its overall policy, Tennessee uses these instruments from
time to time only to hedge known, quantifiable risks arising from fluctuations
in interest rates. The counterparties to these interest rate swaps are major
international financial institutions. The risk associated with counterparty
default on interest-rate swaps is measured as the cost of replacing, at the
prevailing market rates, those contracts in a gain position. In the event of
non-performance by the counterparties, the cost to replace outstanding
interest-rate swaps at December 31, 1994 and 1993, would have been immaterial.
FOREIGN CURRENCY CONTRACTS--At December 31, 1994 and 1993, Tennessee had
entered into currency/interest rate swaps totaling $0 and $59 million,
respectively. These instruments hedged certain translation effects of
Tennessee's investment in net assets in Great Britain. Pursuant to these
arrangements, Tennessee recognized aggregate after-tax translation gains
(losses) of $(1) million, $4 million and $19 million for 1994, 1993 and 1992,
respectively, which have been included in the balance sheet caption "Cumulative
translation adjustments."
In the normal course of business, Tennessee and its foreign subsidiaries
routinely enter into various foreign currency purchase and sale contracts to
hedge the transaction effect of exchange rate movements on receivables and
payables denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts generally mature in
one year or less. At December 31, 1994, Tennessee had net purchase contracts
(primarily Australian Dollars, Belgian Francs, French Francs, Dutch Guilders,
Danish Krone, Spanish Pesetas, Italian Lira and Swedish Krona) with a notional
value of $278 million and net sale contracts (primarily Canadian Dollars,
German Marks and British Pounds) with a notional value of $276 million. At
December 31, 1993, Tennessee had net purchase contracts (primarily Belgian
Francs, French Francs, Dutch Guilders, Danish Krone, Italian Lira and Swedish
Krona) with a notional value of $308 million and net sale contracts (primarily
Canadian Dollars, U.S. Dollars and British Pounds) with a notional value of
$315 million. Based on exchange rates at December 31, 1994 and 1993, the cost
of replacing these contracts in the event of non-performance by the
counterparties would not have been material.
Subsequent to the Case IPO and secondary offering, Tennessee has continued to
perform certain administrative functions for Case, including certain foreign
currency management activities. At December 31, 1994, Tennessee had net
purchase contracts (primarily Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars, Spanish
Pesetas, German Marks and British Pounds) with a notional value of $152 million
and net sale contracts (primarily U.S. Dollars) with a notional value of $152
million with Case which is now reflected in Tennessee's financial statements
using the cost method of accounting.
PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT--Tennessee enters into short-term price swap agreements
to hedge against the price risk associated with natural gas sales and supply
contracts. Tennessee also hedges anticipated injections and withdrawals from
gas storage expected to occur within a year. Consistent with its overall
policy, Tennessee uses these instruments from time to time to mitigate
quantifiable risks arising from fluctuations in gas prices. Tennessee had swap
agreements to exchange monthly payments on notional quantities amounting to
70.2 Bcf and 19.3 Bcf as of December 31, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Based
upon natural gas prices at December 31, 1994, Tennessee would be required to
pay approximately $0.4 million related to these swap agreements. Tennessee is
exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by
counterparties to financial instruments. However, Tennessee believes that these
counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under these
contracts.
GUARANTEES--At December 31, 1994 and 1993, Tennessee had guaranteed payment
and performance of approximately $50 million and $85 million, respectively,
primarily with respect to guarantees supporting various financing and operating
activities.
42
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(6) FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ("FERC") REGULATORY MATTERS
Restructuring Proceedings
Pursuant to Order 636 issued by the FERC on April 8, 1992, the Company
implemented revisions to its tariff which put into effect on September 1, 1993,
the restructuring of its transportation, storage and sales services. Pursuant
to the provisions of Order 636 allowing for the recovery of transition costs
related to the restructuring, the Company has made filings to recover gas
production costs related to its Bastian Bay facilities, the remaining balance
of purchased gas ("PGA") costs, stranded transportation ("TBO") costs and gas
supply realignment ("GSR") costs resulting from remaining gas purchase
obligations.
The Company's filings to recover production costs related to its Bastian Bay
facilities have been rejected by the FERC based on the continued use of the gas
production from the field; however, the FERC recognized the ability of the
Company to file for the recovery of losses upon disposition of these assets.
The Company has filed for appellate review of the FERC actions and is confident
that the Bastian Bay costs will ultimately be recovered as transition costs
directly related to Order 636, and no FERC order has questioned the ultimate
recoverability of these costs.
The filings implementing the Company's recovery mechanisms for the following
transition costs were accepted effective September 1, 1993, and made subject to
refund pending FERC review: 1) direct-billing of unrecovered PGA costs to its
former sales customers over a twelve-month period, 2) recovery of TBO costs,
which the Company is obligated to pay under existing contracts, through a
surcharge from firm transportation customers, adjusted annually and 3) GSR cost
recovery of 90% of such costs over a period of up to thirty-six months from
firm transportation customers and recovery of 10% of such costs from
interruptible transportation customers.
Following negotiations with its customers, the Company filed in July 1994
with the FERC a Stipulation and Agreement (the "PGA Stipulation"), which
provides for the recovery of PGA costs of approximately $100 million and the
recovery of costs associated with the transfer of storage gas inventory to new
storage customers in the Company's restructuring proceeding. The PGA
Stipulation eliminates all challenges to the PGA costs, but establishes a cap
on the charges that may be imposed upon former sales customers. On November 15,
1994, the FERC issued an order approving the PGA Stipulation and resolving all
outstanding issues. However, certain customers have requested a rehearing and
the FERC has deferred action on their issues to a later date. The Company
implemented the terms of the PGA Stipulation on December 1, 1994, and expects
to make refunds in 1995. The Company has recorded a liability which it believes
is adequate to cover the PGA refunds.
The Company is recovering TBO costs formerly incurred to perform its sales
functions, subject to refund, pending review of data submitted by the Company
through technical conference proceedings. On November 18, 1994, the FERC issued
an order on the Company's initial TBO surcharge filing to recover TBO costs for
the twelve-month period beginning September 1, 1993. The order required the
Company to remove certain costs from this surcharge, subject to FERC's review
at a second technical conference and FERC's consideration of a request for
rehearing. On November 30, 1994, the Company filed for a surcharge to recover
approximately $25 million of TBO costs in compliance with the FERC's order, and
in a separate filing, the Company filed to recover its projected annual TBO
costs of approximately $21 million for the twelve-month period beginning
September 1, 1994, through a new TBO surcharge. The FERC accepted the Company's
filing to recover its projected TBO costs, subject to refund, pending review
through technical conference proceedings.
In connection with the Company's GSR cost recovery discussed below, the
Company, along with three other pipelines, executed four separate settlement
agreements with Dakota Gasification Company and the U.S. Department of Energy
and initiated four separate proceedings at the FERC seeking approval to
implement the settlement agreements. The settlement resolved litigation
concerning purchases made by the Company of synthetic gas produced from the
Great Plains Coal Gasification plant ("Great Plains"). On
43
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
October 18, 1994, the FERC consolidated the four proceedings and set them for
hearing before an administrative law judge who is to issue his initial decision
by December 31, 1995. The FERC has committed to a final order by December 31,
1996. The FERC order stated that the costs related to the Great Plains project
are eligible for recovery through GSR and other special recovery mechanisms and
that the costs are eligible for recovery for the duration of the term of the
original gas purchase agreements. The hearing will be limited to the issue of
whether the settlement agreements are prudent.
Also in connection with the Company's GSR cost recovery proceedings discussed
below, on October 14, 1993, the Company was sued in the State District Court of
Ector County, Texas, by ICA Energy, Inc. ("ICA") and TransTexas Gas Corporation
("TransTexas"). In that suit, ICA and TransTexas contended that the Company had
an obligation to purchase gas production which TransTexas thereafter attempted
to add unilaterally to the reserves originally dedicated to a 1979 gas
contract. On two subsequent occasions, TransTexas gave the Company notice that
it was adding new production and/or acreage "to the contract." An amendment to
the pleadings seeks $1.5 billion from the Company for alleged damages caused by
the Company's refusal to purchase gas produced from the TransTexas leases
covering the new production and lands. Neither ICA nor TransTexas were original
parties to that contract. However, they contend that any stranger acquiring a
fractional interest in the original committed reserves, thereby obtains a right
to add to the contract unlimited volumes of gas production from locations in
South Texas. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims of
ICA and TransTexas, which defenses it will vigorously assert.
As of December 31, 1994, the Company has deferred GSR costs yet to be
recovered from its customers of approximately $177 million, net of $187 million
previously collected from its customers, subject to refund. Proceedings have
commenced to review the recovery of these GSR costs; however, the FERC has also
generally encouraged pipelines to settle such issues through negotiations with
customers. Although Order 636 contemplates complete recovery by pipelines of
qualified transition costs, the Company has initiated settlement discussions
with its customers concerning the amount of recoverable GSR costs in response
to recent FERC and customer statements acknowledging the desirability of such
settlements. The Company is also engaged in separate settlement and contract
reformation discussions with holders of certain gas purchase contracts who have
sued the Company, although the Company believes that its defenses in the
underlying gas purchase contract actions are meritorious.
Given the uncertainty over the results of ongoing discussions between the
Company and its customers related to the recovery of GSR costs and the
uncertainty related to predicting the outcome of its gas purchase contract
reformation efforts and the associated litigation, Tennessee is unable to
predict the timing or the ultimate impact the resolution of these issues will
have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Rate Proceedings
The FERC issued final orders approving the Company's Stipulation and
Agreement partially resolving its 1991 rate case. Pursuant to these final FERC
orders, rates for the period February 1, 1992, through August 31, 1993, were
approved, and the Company paid refunds for this period in June 1994. The
refunds had no material effect on reported net income. Also pursuant to these
orders, rates for the period after September 1, 1993, were approved and the
Company paid refunds for the period September 1, 1993, to October 31, 1994, in
February 1995. As of December 31, 1994, the Company had recorded a liability
which is adequate to cover estimated refund obligations.
The approved Stipulation and Agreement discussed above also established
procedures for resolving the recovery of certain environmental expenditures.
These environmental costs are currently being collected in the Company's rates
subject to further review and possible refund. The Company intends to pursue
full recovery of the costs at issue. The Company is also currently pursuing the
possibility of a global settlement
44
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
with its customers that would not only address recovery of the environmental
costs currently being recovered in its rates, but would also establish a
mechanism for recovering a substantial portion of the environmental costs
discussed in Note 15, "Commitments and Contingencies--Environmental Matters,"
that will be expended in the future. The total amount of and timing for any
recovery pursuant to such a global settlement will depend upon the results of
the Company's negotiations with its customers and will be subject to FERC
approval.
On December 30, 1994, the Company filed a general rate increase in Docket No.
RP95-112 which reflected an increase in the Company's revenue requirement of
$118 million, including recovery of certain environmental costs as discussed in
Note 15. On January 25, 1995, the FERC accepted the filing, suspended its
effectiveness for the maximum period of five months pursuant to normal
regulatory process, and set the matter for hearing. This order also required
the convening of a technical conference to address various concerns raised by
the FERC and the Company's customers over, among other issues, the Company's
ability to provide its shippers with timely and accurate operating and billing
information, and the associated systems costs. The ultimate resolution of these
issues may result in adjustments to customer billings. Subject to the outcome
of these issues and certain modifications identified in the FERC order, the
increased rates will become effective on July 1, 1995, subject to refund.
(7) INCOME TAXES
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and its parent, Tenneco Inc., together with
certain of their respective subsidiaries which are owned 80% or more, have
entered into an agreement to file a consolidated federal income tax return.
Such agreement provides, among other things, that (1) each company in a taxable
income position will be currently charged with an amount equivalent to its
federal income tax computed on a separate return basis and (2) each company in
a tax loss position will be currently reimbursed to the extent its deductions,
including general business credits, are utilized in the consolidated return.
Effective January 1, 1992, Tennessee changed its method of accounting for
income taxes from the deferred method to the liability method required by FAS
No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" using the cumulative catch-up method.
This standard requires that a deferred tax be recorded to reflect the tax
expense (benefit) resulting from the recognition of temporary differences.
Temporary differences are differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements that will
result in differences between income for tax purposes and income for financial
statement purposes in future years. No provision has been made for U.S. income
taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries ($409 million at December
31, 1994) since it is the present intention of management to reinvest a major
portion of such unremitted earnings in foreign operations.
The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. income before income taxes..................... $ 828 $ 792 $ 823
Foreign income (loss) before income taxes........... 128 171 (194)
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes........................ $ 956 $ 963 $ 629
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Following is an analysis of the components of consolidated income tax expense
applicable to continuing operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current--
U.S............................................. $ 197 $ 225 $ 599
State and local................................. 32 46 71
Foreign......................................... 38 31 58
-------- -------- --------
267 302 728
-------- -------- --------
General business credits (U.S.)--
Current......................................... (5) (1) (10)
Deferred........................................ -- -- 10
-------- -------- --------
(5) (1) --
-------- -------- --------
Deferred--
U.S............................................. 46 43 (380)
State and local................................. 10 11 (23)
Foreign......................................... (28) (26) --
-------- -------- --------
28 28 (403)
-------- -------- --------
Income tax expense................................ $ 290 $ 329 $ 325
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
In August 1993, the U.S. federal income tax rate was increased from 34% to
35%, retroactive to January 1, 1993. For 1992, this rate was 34%. Following is
a reconciliation of income taxes computed at the U.S. federal income tax rate
to the income tax expense from continuing operations reflected in the
Statements of Income (Loss):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax expense computed at the U.S. federal income
tax rate........................................ $335 $337 $ 214
Increases (reductions) in income tax expense
resulting from:
Foreign income taxed at different rates and
foreign losses with no tax benefit............ 15 4 49
Restructuring costs............................ -- -- 33
Permanent differences on sale of businesses.... (44) (6) --
State and local taxes on income, net of U.S.
federal income tax benefit.................... 27 37 32
U.S. federal income tax rate change............ -- 11 --
Realization of unrecognized deferred tax assets
resulting from consolidation of Tennessee's
German operations............................. (12) (37) --
Other.......................................... (31) (17) (3)
-------- -------- --------
Income tax expense............................... $290 $329 $325
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The components of Tennessee's net deferred tax liability at December 31, 1994
and 1993, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets--
Tax loss carryforwards....................................... $ 217 $ 211
Restructuring costs.......................................... -- 61
Postretirement benefits other than pensions.................. 90 90
Environmental reserve........................................ 83 82
Other........................................................ 163 136
Valuation allowance.......................................... (235) (188)
------ ------
Net deferred tax asset..................................... 318 392
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities--
Tax over book depreciation................................... 781 749
Asset related to environmental costs relative to operations
regulated by the FERC....................................... 56 59
Pension...................................................... 107 132
Long-term shipbuilding contracts............................. 54 91
Interest capitalized......................................... 23 28
Debt related items........................................... 44 44
Book versus tax gains and losses on asset disposals.......... 418 306
Other........................................................ 151 181
------ ------
Total deferred tax liability............................... 1,634 1,590
------ ------
Net deferred tax liability..................................... $1,316 $1,198
====== ======
</TABLE>
As reflected in the table above, Tennessee had potential tax benefits of $235
million and $188 million which were not recognized in the Statements of Income
(Loss) when generated. These benefits resulted primarily from tax loss
carryforwards which are available to reduce future tax liabilities. During 1994
and 1993, $12 million and $37 million, respectively, were realized as a result
of consolidation of Tennessee's German operations. The remainder of the change
from 1993 to 1994 resulted primarily from the Case reorganization, IPO and
secondary offering, and the acquisition of Tenneco Canada Inc. by TIHC from a
subsidiary of Tenneco Inc.
At December 31, 1994, Tennessee had unrecognized tax benefits of $128 million
related to U.S. capital loss carryforwards which expire in 1999 and had $89
million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards which will carry forward
indefinitely.
47
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(8) SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF TENNESSEE'S FINANCE SUBSIDIARIES
Summarized financial information of Tennessee's finance subsidiaries at
December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992, and for the years then ended is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Notes and accounts receivable (net)............................. $160 $455 $937
Other current assets............................................ 212 3 21
Long-term receivables (net)..................................... -- 75 97
Non-current assets.............................................. 5 5 6
Short-term debt................................................. 229 235 685
Long-term debt.................................................. -- 130 171
Other liabilities............................................... 2 15 38
Equity in net assets............................................ 146 158 167
Interest and other income....................................... 38 71 145
Interest, taxes and other expenses.............................. 28 66 134
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle............. -- -- (1)
Net income...................................................... 10 5 10
</TABLE>
(9) MINORITY INTEREST
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, Tennessee reported minority interest in the
balance sheet of $475 million and $2 million, respectively. At December 31,
1994, $300 million of minority interest resulted from the December 1994 sale by
Tennessee of a 25% preferred stock interest in TIHC to a financial investor.
Additionally, $156 million of minority interest resulted from the December 1994
issuance of TIHC common stock to a Tenneco Inc. subsidiary in exchange for 100%
of the issued and outstanding common stock of Tenneco Canada Inc. TIHC is a
separate legal entity from the Company and holds certain assets including the
capital stock of Tenneco Canada Inc., S.A. Tenneco Belgium, Monroe Australia
Pty. Limited, Walker France and other subsidiaries included in Tennessee's
Automotive parts segment. TIHC also holds financial obligations of Tenneco Inc.
or guaranteed by Tenneco Inc. At December 31, 1994, TIHC had loans of $264
million to Tenneco Inc. For financial reporting purposes, the assets,
liabilities and earnings of TIHC and its subsidiaries have continued to be
consolidated in Tennessee's financial statements, and the financial investor's
preferred stock interest and the Tenneco Inc. subsidiary's common stock
interest have been recorded as minority interest.
Dividends on the TIHC preferred stock are based on the issue price ($300
million) times a rate per annum equal to 1.12% over LIBOR and are payable
quarterly in arrears on the last business day of each quarter commencing on
March 31, 1995. Additionally, beginning in 1996, the holder of the 12,000,000
shares of preferred stock will be entitled to receive, when and if declared by
the Board of Directors of TIHC, participating dividends based on the operating
income growth rate of TIHC.
48
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(10) PLANT, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, AT COST
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, plant, property and equipment, at cost, by
major segment was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Natural gas pipelines.......................................... $ 5,654 $ 5,246
Farm and construction equipment................................ -- 348
Automotive parts............................................... 1,313 910
Shipbuilding................................................... 1,494 1,527
Packaging...................................................... 1,661 1,468
Discontinued chemicals operations.............................. 780 739
Other.......................................................... 107 107
------- -------
$11,009 $10,345
======= =======
</TABLE>
(11) POSTRETIREMENT AND POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
Postretirement Benefits
Tennessee has postretirement health care and life insurance plans which cover
substantially all of its domestic employees. For salaried employees, the plans
cover employees retiring from Tennessee on or after attaining age 55 who have
had at least 10 years service with Tennessee after attaining age 45. The
salaried plans were amended during 1993 to reduce the cost of providing future
benefits. For hourly employees, the postretirement benefit plans generally
cover employees who retire pursuant to one of Tennessee's hourly employee
retirement plans. All of these benefits may be subject to deductibles,
copayment provisions and other limitations, and Tennessee has reserved the
right to change these benefits.
Effective January 1, 1992, for its domestic operations, Tennessee adopted FAS
No. 106 which requires employers to account for the cost of these
postretirement benefits on the accrual basis rather than on the "pay-as-you-go"
basis which was Tennessee's previous practice. Tennessee elected to recognize
this change in accounting principle on the cumulative catch-up basis. The
effect on 1992 income of immediately recognizing the transition obligation was
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
----------
<S> <C>
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation........................ $ 302
Income tax benefit................................................... (103)
-----
Decrease in net income............................................... $ 199
=====
</TABLE>
Tennessee will adopt FAS No. 106 for its international operations in the
first quarter of 1995 but does not expect the adoption to have a material
effect on Tennessee's financial position or results of operations.
The majority of Tennessee's postretirement benefit plans are not funded. In
June 1994, two trusts were established to fund postretirement benefits for
certain plan participants of the Natural gas pipelines segment. The
contributions are collected from customers in FERC approved rates. As of
December 31, 1994, cumulative contributions were $5 million. Plan assets
consist principally of fixed income securities.
49
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The funded status of the domestic plans reconciles with amounts recognized on
the balance sheet at December 31, 1994 and 1993, as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993
----- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation at September 30:
Retirees....................................................... $ 271 $ 247
Fully eligible active plan participants........................ 45 54
Other active plan participants................................. 60 68
----- -----
Total accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.............. 376 369
Plan assets at fair value at September 30........................ 2 --
----- -----
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets at September 30.......................................... (374) (369)
Claims paid during the fourth quarter............................ 8 7
Unrecognized reduction of prior service obligations resulting
from plan amendments............................................ (34) (35)
Unrecognized net loss resulting from plan experience and changes
in actuarial assumptions........................................ 95 89
----- -----
Accrued postretirement benefit cost at December 31............... $(305) $(308)
===== =====
</TABLE>
In conjunction with the Case IPO in June 1994, active Case salaried employees
were transferred from the Tenneco Inc. plans to new Case salaried plans, and
Case hourly retirees were transferred from the Case hourly plans to the Tenneco
Inc. plans. Amendments to reduce the cost of providing future benefits for Case
hourly retirees were reflected at that time. In January 1995, the liability
related to Case retirees covered by Tenneco Inc. plans, $251 million at
December 31, 1994, was transferred, with an equal amount of cash, from Tenneco
Inc. to Tenneco Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Prior to the June 1994 IPO, Tennessee sold all of its Farm and construction
equipment net assets to Case Corporation. Therefore, all Case liabilities for
the new Case plans are excluded from the Tennessee disclosure information
beginning in 1994. Benefit costs for these plans have been included up to the
date of the sale (for six months of 1994). For additional information
concerning Tennessee's changing ownership in Case, reference is made to Note 1,
"Control and Summary of Accounting Policies" and Note 3, "Discontinued
Operations, Dispositions of Assets and Extraordinary Loss."
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost from continuing operations for
the years 1994, 1993 and 1992 consists of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost for benefits earned during the year................. $ 7 $ 9 $ 7
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation... 28 31 24
Net amortization of unrecognized amounts......................... (2) (2) --
--- --- ---
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost......................... $33 $38 $31
=== === ===
</TABLE>
Curtailments, settlements and special termination benefits under these plans
were not significant for 1994, 1993 and 1992.
The initial weighted average assumed health care cost trend rate used in
determining the 1994, 1993 and 1992 accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation was 8%, 9% and 12%, respectively, declining to 5% in 1997 and
remaining at that level thereafter.
50
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage-point in
each year would increase the 1994, 1993 and 1992 accumulated postretirement
benefit obligations by approximately $24 million, $19 million and $47 million,
respectively, and would increase the aggregate of the service cost and interest
cost components of the net postretirement benefit cost for 1994, 1993 and 1992
by approximately $3 million, $4 million and $6 million, respectively.
The discount rates (which are based on long-term market rates) used in
determining the 1994, 1993 and 1992 accumulated postretirement benefit
obligations were 8.25%, 7.50% and 8.75%, respectively.
Postemployment Benefits
Tennessee adopted FAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits," in the first quarter of 1994. This new accounting rule requires
employers to account for postemployment benefits for former or inactive
employees after employment but before retirement on the accrual basis rather
than the "pay-as-you-go" basis. Implementation of this new rule reduced 1994
net income by $13 million, net of income tax benefits of $7 million, which was
reported as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
(12) PENSION PLANS
Tennessee has retirement plans which cover substantially all of its
employees. Benefits are based on years of service and, for most salaried
employees, on final average compensation. Tennessee's funding policies are to
contribute to the plans amounts necessary to satisfy the funding requirements
of federal laws and regulations. Plan assets consist principally of listed
equity and fixed income securities.
The funded status of the plans reconciles with amounts recognized on the
balance sheet at December 31, 1994 and 1993, as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
PLANS IN WHICH PLANS IN WHICH
ASSETS EXCEED ACCUMULATED
ACCUMULATED BENEFITS
BENEFITS EXCEED ASSETS ALL PLANS (NOTE)
---------------- ---------------- ------------------
1994 1993 1994 1993 1994 1993
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value
of benefits based on
service to date and
present pay levels at
September 30:
Vested benefit
obligation........... $ 1,729 $ 1,879 $ 18 $ 118 $ 1,747 $ 1,997
Non-vested benefit
obligation........... 86 89 2 3 88 92
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Accumulated benefit
obligation........... 1,815 1,968 20 121 1,835 2,089
Additional amounts
related to projected
salary increases....... 222 247 2 5 224 252
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Total projected benefit
obligation at September
30..................... 2,037 2,215 22 126 2,059 2,341
Plan assets at fair
value at September 30.. 2,310 2,584 4 33 2,314 2,617
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Plan assets in excess of
(less than) total
projected benefit
obligation at September
30..................... 273 369 (18) (93) 255 276
Contributions during the
fourth quarter......... 17 3 -- 1 17 4
Unrecognized net (gain)
loss resulting from
plan experience and
changes in actuarial
assumptions............ 96 48 1 3 97 51
Unrecognized prior
service obligations
resulting from plan
amendments............. 99 158 1 4 100 162
Remaining unrecognized
net obligation (asset)
at initial application. (165) (189) 1 2 (164) (187)
Adjustment recorded to
recognize minimum
liability.............. -- -- (1) (10) (1) (10)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Prepaid (accrued)
pension cost at
December 31............ $ 320 $ 389 $ (16) $ (93) $ 304 $ 296
======= ======= ======= ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
--------
NOTE: Assets of one plan may not be utilized to pay benefits of other plans.
51
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
In December 1993, all liabilities and assets were transferred from the Case
Corporation Pension Plan for Hourly-Paid Employees ("Case Plan") to the
Tenneco Inc. Retirement Plan. These liabilities are currently overfunded and
in January 1995, plan assets and liabilities (totaling a $133 million asset)
were transferred, in exchange for cash, from Tenneco Inc. to Tenneco
Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In June 1994, all
future accruals for the salaried and hourly active Case employees were
transferred from the Tenneco Inc. Retirement Plan to new Case plans. Prior to
the June 1994 IPO, Tennessee sold all of its Farm and construction equipment
net assets to Case Corporation. Therefore, all domestic and foreign Case
liabilities and assets in the new Case plans are excluded from the Tennessee
disclosure information beginning in 1994. Pension cost (income) for these
plans has been included up to the date of the sale (for six months of 1994).
Net periodic pension costs (income) from continuing operations for the years
1994, 1993 and 1992 consist of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
1994 1993 1992
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost--benefits earned during the
year...................................... $ 59 $ 56 $ 52
Interest accrued on prior year's projected
benefit obligation........................ 131 134 124
Expected return on plan assets--
Actual (return) loss..................... 140 (315) (178)
Unrecognized excess (deficiency) of
actual return over expected return...... (330) 126 (3)
---- ---- ----
(190) (189) (181)
Net amortization of unrecognized amounts... (9) (9) (12)
---- ---- ----
Net periodic pension costs (income)........ $ (9) $ (8) $(17)
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
Curtailments, settlements and special termination benefits under these plans
were not significant in 1994, 1993 and 1992.
The weighted average discount rates (which are based on long-term market
rates) used in determining the 1994, 1993 and 1992 actuarial present value of
the benefit obligations were 8.5%, 7.7% and 8.9%, respectively. The rate of
increase in future compensation was 5.1%, 5.1% and 6.6% for 1994, 1993 and
1992, respectively. The weighted average expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets was 10.0%, 9.8% and 10.0% for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
52
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(13) SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEGMENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATURAL FARM AND RECLASS.
GAS CONSTRUCTION AUTOMOTIVE AND
PIPELINES EQUIPMENT(C) PARTS SHIPBUILDING PACKAGING CHEMICALS OTHER ELIMINATION CONSOLIDATED
--------- ------------ ---------- ------------ --------- --------- ------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AT DECEMBER 31,
1994, AND FOR THE
YEAR THEN ENDED
Net sales and
operating
revenues(a)........ $2,378 $ 518 $1,850 $1,753 $2,184 $ -- $ -- $ (7) $8,676
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Operating profit
(loss)............. 431 (1) 214 213 217 -- 193 -- 1,267
General corporate
expenses........... (16) -- (9) (13) (8) -- -- -- (46)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Income (loss) before
interest expense,
income taxes and
minority interest.. 415 (1) 205 200 209 -- 193 -- 1,221
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Identifiable assets. 3,241 -- 1,477 1,353 1,884 -- 4,056 (149) 11,862
Investment in
affiliated
companies.......... 359 56 2 -- 3 -- -- -- 420
Identifiable assets
related to
discontinued
operations......... -- -- -- -- -- 849 -- (4) 845
Investment in
affiliated
companies related
to discontinued
operations......... -- -- -- -- -- 103 -- -- 103
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Total assets..... 3,600 56 1,479 1,353 1,887 952 4,056 (153) 13,230
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Depreciation,
depletion and
amortization....... 100 7 45 70 82 -- 3 -- 307
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Capital expenditures
for continuing
operations......... 331 4 106 29 166 -- 14 -- 650
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
AT DECEMBER 31,
1993, AND FOR THE
YEAR THEN ENDED
Net sales and
operating
revenues(a)........ $2,862 $1,014 $1,628 $1,861 $2,042 $ -- $ 1 $ (8) $9,400
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Operating profit.... 425 49 206 238 148 -- 219 -- 1,285
General corporate
expenses........... (14) -- (8) (13) (9) -- -- -- (44)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Income before
interest expense,
income taxes and
minority interest.. 411 49 198 225 139 -- 219 -- 1,241
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Identifiable assets. 2,953 911 1,044 1,277 1,712 -- 3,392 (77) 11,212
Investment in
affiliated
companies.......... 307 (44) 4 -- 6 -- 75 -- 348
Identifiable assets
related to
discontinued
operations......... -- -- 69 -- -- 815 -- (2) 882
Investments in
affiliated
companies related
to discontinued
operations......... -- -- -- -- -- 62 -- -- 62
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Total assets..... 3,260 867 1,117 1,277 1,718 877 3,467 (79) 12,504
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Depreciation,
depletion and
amortization....... 166 16 44 72 77 -- 3 -- 378
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Capital expenditures
for continuing
operations......... 170 11 89 36 124 -- 1 -- 431
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
AT DECEMBER 31,
1992, AND FOR THE
YEAR THEN ENDED
Net sales and
operating
revenues(a)........ $2,183 $1,256 $1,616 $2,265 $2,078 $ -- $ 2 $ (6) $9,394
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Operating profit
(loss)............. 374 (264) 217 262 229 -- 211 -- 1,029
General corporate
expenses........... (14) -- (7) (13) (8) -- -- -- (42)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Income (loss) before
interest expense,
income taxes and
minority interest.. 360 (264) 210 249 221 -- 211 -- 987
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Identifiable assets. 3,119 1,391 861 1,469 1,406 -- 3,983 (107) 12,122
Investment in
affiliated
companies.......... 296 (34) 1 -- 23 -- 74 -- 360
Identifiable assets
related to
discontinued
operations......... -- -- 69 -- -- 724 -- -- 793
Investment in
affiliated
companies related
to discontinued
operations......... -- -- -- -- -- 61 -- -- 61
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Total assets..... 3,415 1,357 931 1,469 1,429 785 4,057 (107) 13,336
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Depreciation,
depletion and
amortization....... 156 32 41 74 73 -- 3 -- 379
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Capital expenditures
for continuing
operations......... 251 5 58 35 97 -- 2 -- 448
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
</TABLE>
(See notes on the following page.)
53
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
--------
NOTES: (a) Contracts with U.S. government agencies (primarily shipbuilding
contracts with the U.S. Navy) accounted for $1.7 billion, $1.8
billion and $2.2 billion for 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
(b) Products are transferred between geographic areas on a basis intended
to reflect as nearly as possible the "market value" of the products.
(c) In July 1994, Tennessee's accounting for its Farm and construction
equipment segment changed due to the June 1994 reorganization and
IPO. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 3.
Tennessee is engaged in the sale of products for export from the United
States. Such sales are reflected in the table below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
GEOGRAPHIC AREA PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS 1994 1993 1992
--------------- ------------------ ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Canada.................. Exhaust and ride control systems, natural gas,
paperboard products, molded and pressed pulp
goods, corrugated boxes $75 $115 $ 63
European Community...... Navigation aids, molded and pressed
pulp goods, paperboard products 23 36 47
Other Foreign........... Ride control systems, molded and pressed
pulp goods, paperboard products,
corrugated boxes 49 60 58
---- ---- ----
Total Export Sales..... $147 $211 $168
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
54
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
----------------------------------------------------------
GEOGRAPHIC AREA(C)
---------------------------------
RECLASS.
UNITED EUROPEAN OTHER AND
STATES CANADA COMMUNITY FOREIGN ELIMINATION CONSOLIDATED
------- ------ --------- ------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AT DECEMBER 31, 1994,
AND FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED
Net sales and operating
revenues:
External(a)............ $ 7,327 $ 16 $1,056 $277 $ -- $ 8,676
Intergeographic
area(b)............... 19 -- 58 37 (114) --
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Total.................. 7,346 16 1,114 314 (114) 8,676
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
Operating profit........ 1,141 2 83 41 -- 1,267
General corporate
expenses............... (46) -- -- -- -- (46)
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Income before interest
expense, income taxes
and minority interest.. 1,095 2 83 41 -- 1,221
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
Identifiable assets..... 10,151 155 1,339 327 (110) 11,862
Investment in affiliated
companies.............. 417 -- -- 3 -- 420
Identifiable assets
related to discontinued
operations............. 177 43 602 42 (19) 845
Investment in affiliated
companies related to
discontinued
operations............. 26 -- 3 74 -- 103
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Total assets........... 10,771 198 1,944 446 (129) 13,230
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
AT DECEMBER 31, 1993,
AND FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED
Net sales and operating
revenues:
External(a)............ $ 7,608 $ 11 $1,467 $314 $ -- $ 9,400
Intergeographic
area(b)............... 31 -- 61 27 (119) --
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Total.................. 7,639 11 1,528 341 (119) 9,400
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
Operating profit........ 1,113 1 104 67 -- 1,285
General corporate
expenses............... (44) -- -- -- -- (44)
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Income before interest
expense, income taxes
and minority interest.. 1,069 1 104 67 -- 1,241
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
Identifiable assets..... 9,321 7 1,520 396 (32) 11,212
Investment in affiliated
companies.............. 313 -- 27 8 -- 348
Identifiable assets
related to discontinued
operations............. 219 64 565 43 (9) 882
Investment in affiliated
companies related to
discontinued
operations............. 26 -- 5 31 -- 62
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Total assets........... 9,879 71 2,117 478 (41) 12,504
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
AT DECEMBER 31, 1992,
AND FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED
Net sales and operating
revenues:
External(a)............ $ 7,283 $ 9 $1,811 $291 $ -- $ 9,394
Intergeographic
area(b)............... 22 -- 69 27 (118) --
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Total.................. 7,305 9 1,880 318 (118) 9,394
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
Operating profit (loss). 1,198 -- (182) 13 -- 1,029
General corporate
expenses............... (42) -- -- -- -- (42)
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Income (loss) before
interest expense,
income taxes and
minority interest...... 1,156 -- (182) 13 -- 987
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
Identifiable assets..... 9,944 39 1,853 328 (42) 12,122
Investment in affiliated
companies.............. 298 -- 14 48 -- 360
Identifiable assets
related to discontinued
operations............. 215 70 482 34 (8) 793
Investment in affiliated
companies related to
discontinued
operations............. 23 -- 8 30 -- 61
------- ---- ------ ---- ----- -------
Total assets........... 10,480 109 2,357 440 (50) 13,336
======= ==== ====== ==== ===== =======
</TABLE>
(See notes on the previous page.)
55
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(14) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
To respond to depressed market conditions facing the farm and construction
equipment business and to improve Case's performance, aggressive measures were
taken at Case since September 1991, resulting in significant improvement in
Case's performance. However, the worldwide farm and construction equipment
market continued to deteriorate during 1992, and Tenneco Inc. Management and
the Board of Directors determined that major structural and strategic changes
were necessary in order to (1) rationalize certain component production
operations to reduce the fixed cost portion of the manufacturing process; (2)
reduce excess capacity; (3) focus, discontinue or replace unprofitable and
noncompetitive product lines; and (4) restructure and refocus product and
component parts distribution to strengthen Case's competitive position in the
global marketplace.
Consequently, on March 21, 1993, the Board of Directors of Tenneco Inc.
adopted a comprehensive restructuring program for Case. Adoption of this
program resulted in a pre-tax restructuring charge of $241 million, all of
which was reflected in the 1992 income from continuing operations before
interest expense and income taxes. The $241 million pre-tax charge was recorded
as a $104 million reduction of net plant, property and equipment, an $11
million reduction of inventory, a $5 million reduction of intangibles and other
accounts and a $121 million reserve for the future cost of implementing the
various restructuring actions.
The specific restructuring measures were based on management's best business
judgement under prevailing circumstances and on assumptions which may be
revised over time and as circumstances change. As the initial actions were
implemented and plans progressed for measures to be taken over the next three
years, Tenneco Inc. determined that it was appropriate to reallocate its
estimate of the overall pre-tax restructuring charge among the companies in the
Tenneco Inc. Farm and construction equipment group, not all of which were
subsidiaries of Tennessee. During 1993, this resulted in a $62 million
reduction of the $241 million pre-tax charge recorded by Tennessee in 1992 with
a corresponding increase in the amounts attributable to other Tenneco Inc. Farm
and construction equipment group affiliates which were not included in the
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company consolidation. The estimated costs associated
with such measures may require further revision in the future.
(15) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Capital Commitments
Tennessee estimates that expenditures aggregating approximately $1.0 billion
will be required after December 31, 1994, to complete facilities and projects
authorized at such date, and substantial commitments have been made in
connection therewith.
Purchase Obligations
In connection with the financing commitments of certain joint ventures,
Tennessee has entered into unconditional purchase obligations for products and
services of $190 million ($139 million on a present value basis) at December
31, 1994. Tennessee's annual obligations under these agreements are $27 million
for 1995, $27 million for 1996, $25 million for 1997, $23 million for 1998 and
$23 million for 1999. Payments under such obligations, including additional
purchases in excess of contractual obligations, were $34 million, $31 million
and $33 million for the years 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. In addition,
in connection with the Great Plains coal gasification project (Dakota
Gasification Company), the Company has contracted to purchase 30% of the output
of the plant's original design capacity for a remaining period of 15 years. The
Company is in the process of settling this contract as a part of its Gas Supply
Realignment negotiations discussed in Note 6.
56
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Lease Commitments
Tennessee holds certain of its facilities and equipment under long-term
leases. The minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases
with lease terms in excess of one year are $146 million, $129 million, $125
million, $125 million and $115 million for the years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and
1999, respectively, and $1,032 million for subsequent years. Of these amounts,
$79 million for 1995, $81 million for 1996, $84 million for 1997, $93 million
for 1998, $86 million for 1999 and $781 million for subsequent years are lease
payment commitments to GECC, John Hancock and Metropolitan Life for assets
purchased from Georgia-Pacific in January 1991 and leased to Tennessee.
Commitments under capital leases were not significant to the accompanying
financial statements. Total rental expense for continuing operations for the
years 1994, 1993 and 1992, was $168 million, $173 million and $177 million,
respectively, including minimum rentals under non-cancelable operating leases
of $168 million, $173 million and $175 million for the corresponding periods.
Litigation
Reference is made to Note 6, "FERC Regulatory Matters," for information
concerning gas supply litigation. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and its
subsidiaries are parties to numerous other legal proceedings arising from their
operations. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company believes that the outcome of these
proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will have no material effect on
the financial position or results of operations of Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Environmental Matters
The Company is engaged in an internal project to identify and deal with the
presence of 1) polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs") and 2) other substances of
concern, including substances on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
("EPA") List of Hazardous Substances ("HS List") at compressor stations and
other facilities operated by both its interstate and intrastate natural gas
pipeline systems. While conducting this project, the Company is in frequent
contact with federal and state regulatory agencies, both through informal
negotiation and formal entry of consent orders, in order to assure that its
efforts meet regulatory requirements.
Tennessee has established a reserve for the Company's environmental expenses,
which includes: 1) expected remediation expense and associated onsite, offsite
and groundwater technical studies, 2) legal fees and 3) settlement of third
party and governmental litigation, including civil penalties. Through December
31, 1994, Tennessee has charged approximately $88 million against the
environmental reserve. Of the remaining reserve, $30 million has been recorded
on the balance sheet under "Payables-Trade" and $145 million under "Deferred
Credits and Other Liabilities."
Due to the current uncertainty regarding the further activity necessary for
the Company to address the substances on the HS List and other substances of
concern, including the requirements for site characterization, the actual
presence of such substances at the sites, and the final, site-specific cleanup
decisions to be made with respect to cleanup levels and remediation
technologies, the Company cannot at this time project what additional costs, if
any, may result from such activity. While there are still many uncertainties
relating to the ultimate costs which may be incurred, based upon the Company's
continuing evaluation and experience to date, Tennessee continues to believe
that the amount of the reserve is adequate.
Tennessee believes that a substantial portion of these costs, which will be
expended over the next five to ten years, will be recovered from customers of
its natural gas pipelines. The Company is currently recovering environmental
expenses annually in its rates. Reference is made to Note 6 for more
information regarding
57
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
recovery of environmental costs. A significant portion of these expenses
remains subject to review and refund in the Company's 1991 rate case. Tennessee
is also currently pursuing the possibility of a global settlement with its
customers that would not only address recovery of the environmental costs
currently being recovered in its rates, but would also establish a mechanism
for recovering a substantial portion of the environmental costs that will be
expended in the future. The total amount of and timing for any recovery
pursuant to such a global settlement will depend upon the results of
Tennessee's negotiations with its customers and will be subject to FERC
approval. As of December 31, 1994, the asset balance is $135 million.
Tennessee believes that its liability insurance policies in effect during the
period in which the environmental issues occurred provide coverage for
remediation costs and related claims. The Company has pending litigation in a
Louisiana state court against its insurance carriers during this period,
seeking recovery of costs which the Company incurred. The issues in dispute
involve determining: 1) whether the presence of PCBs and other substances at
each compressor station constituted a separate occurrence for purposes of the
per-occurrence limits of the policies; 2) the applicability of the pollution
exclusions in certain policies issued after 1971; 3) the applicability of
provisions which exclude the environmental impacts located solely on the
insured's property; 4) whether the term "property damage" in the policies will
cover the cost of compliance with governmental cleanup directives; 5) the
allocation of costs to the various policies in effect during the period the
environmental impact occurred; 6) the applicability of provisions excluding
pollution that is "expected or intended" and 7) the adequacy of notice of
claims to insurance carriers. Tennessee has completed settlements with and
received payment from several of the defendant carriers and believes that the
likelihood of recovery of a portion of its remediation costs and claims against
the remaining defendant carriers is reasonably possible. Any such recovery
would likely be considered in resolving environmental cost recoveries with the
Company's customers.
In July 1994, the Company commenced litigation in a Kentucky state court
against the manufacturer of the PCB-containing lubricant used by the Company,
seeking reimbursement of sums the Company has and will incur in the defense and
settlement of PCB-related claims brought by state and federal agencies, private
individuals and others. The Company anticipates that the defendant will raise a
variety of issues in dispute of the Company's claims.
While Tennessee believes its legal position to be meritorious, Tennessee has
not adjusted its environmental reserve to reflect any anticipated insurance
recoveries or recoveries from the manufacturer of the PCB-containing lubricant.
Tennessee has identified other sites in its various operating divisions where
environmental remediation expense may be required should there be a change in
ownership, operations or applicable regulations. These possibilities cannot be
predicted or quantified at this time and accordingly, no provision has been
recorded. However, provisions have been made for all instances where it has
been determined that the incurrence of any material remedial expense is
reasonably possible.
58
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(16) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUMULATIVE
INCOME BEFORE INCOME EFFECT OF
INTEREST (LOSS) FROM CHANGE IN
NET SALES EXPENSE, INCOME DISCONTINUED ACCOUNTING
AND INCOME TAXES FROM OPERATIONS, EXTRAORDINARY PRINCIPLE,
OPERATING AND MINORITY CONTINUING NET OF LOSS, NET OF NET OF NET
QUARTER REVENUES INTEREST OPERATIONS INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME
------- --------- ------------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1994
1st................... $2,257 $ 265 $122 $ 6 $ -- $(13) $115
2nd................... 2,378 275 97 (8) -- -- 89
3rd................... 2,011 376 216 7 -- -- 223
4th................... 2,030 305 230 (167) -- -- 63
------ ------ ---- ----- ---- ---- ----
$8,676 $1,221 $665 $(162) $ -- $(13) $490
====== ====== ==== ===== ==== ==== ====
1993
1st................... $2,391 $ 321 $138 $ 10 $ -- $ -- $148
2nd................... 2,402 276 122 15 (22) -- 115
3rd................... 2,282 306 170 7 (2) -- 175
4th................... 2,325 338 204 27 -- -- 231
------ ------ ---- ----- ---- ---- ----
$9,400 $1,241 $634 $ 59 $(24) $ -- $669
====== ====== ==== ===== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
--------
Note: Reference is made to Notes 1, 3, and 14 for discussion of items affecting
quarterly results.
(The preceding notes are an integral part of the foregoing financial
statements.)
59
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
There has been no change in accountants during 1994 or 1993, nor has there
been any disagreement on any matter of accounting principles or practices or
financial disclosure which is required to be reported pursuant to this Item 9.
PART III
Item 10, "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant," Item 11,
"Executive Compensation," Item 12, "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management," and Item 13, "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions," have been omitted from this report pursuant to the reduced
disclosure format permitted by General Instruction J to Form 10-K.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 8
See "Index to Financial Statements of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and
Consolidated Subsidiaries" set forth in Item 8, "Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data."
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES INCLUDED IN ITEM 14
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company--
Statements of income (loss) for the three years ended December 31, 1994. 62
Statements of cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 1994.... 63
Balance Sheets--December 31, 1994 and 1993.............................. 64
Notes to financial statements........................................... 66
Schedule of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries--
Schedule II--Valuation and qualifying accounts--three years ended
December 31, 1994...................................................... 67
</TABLE>
SCHEDULES OMITTED AS NOT REQUIRED OR INAPPLICABLE
Schedule I--Condensed financial information of registrant
Schedule III--Real estate and accumulated depreciation
Schedule IV--Mortgage loans on real estate
Schedule V--Supplemental Information Concerning Property--Casualty
Insurance Operations
60
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
61
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
----------------------
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Net sales and operating revenues--
Natural gas pipelines.............................. $1,040 $1,212 $1,104
Automotive parts................................... 621 559 543
------ ------ ------
1,661 1,771 1,647
Interest income
Affiliated companies............................... 92 39 55
Other.............................................. 16 9 15
Gain on sale of investments and other assets......... 4 11 --
Other income, net.................................... 18 42 11
------ ------ ------
1,791 1,872 1,728
------ ------ ------
Costs and Expenses:
Costs of sales (exclusive of depreciation shown
below).............................................. 424 362 357
Operating expenses................................... 591 688 592
Selling, general and administrative.................. 224 219 208
Depreciation and amortization........................ 97 170 152
Interest expense (net of interest capitalized)
Affiliated companies............................... 118 52 11
Other.............................................. 158 198 280
------ ------ ------
1,612 1,689 1,600
------ ------ ------
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Tax
Expense and Equity in Net Income From Continuing
Operations of Affiliated Companies.................... 179 183 128
------ ------ ------
Income Tax Expense (Benefit):
Current.............................................. 43 53 59
Deferred............................................. (1) 8 (12)
------ ------ ------
42 61 47
------ ------ ------
Equity in Net Income From Continuing Operations of
Affiliated Companies.................................. 528 512 223
------ ------ ------
Income From Continuing Operations...................... 665 634 304
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations, Net of
Income Tax............................................ (162) 59 134
------ ------ ------
Income Before Extraordinary Loss....................... 503 693 438
Extraordinary Loss, Net of Income Tax.................. -- (24) (9)
------ ------ ------
Income Before Cumulative Effect of Changes in
Accounting Principles................................. 503 669 429
Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principles,
Net of Income Tax..................................... (13) -- (436)
------ ------ ------
Net Income (Loss)...................................... $ 490 $ 669 $ (7)
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
statements of income (loss).)
62
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1994 1993 1992
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Activities:
Income from continuing operations....................... $ 665 $ 634 $ 304
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing
operations to net cash provided (used) by operating
activities--
Depreciation and amortization......................... 97 170 152
Deferred income taxes................................. (1) 8 (12)
Undistributed earnings of affiliated companies........ (528) (480) 9
Gain on sale of investments and other assets.......... (4) (11) --
Changes in components of working capital:
(Increase) decrease in receivables.................. (4) 201 (24)
(Increase) decrease in inventories.................. (7) (6) 1
(Increase) decrease in prepayments and other current
assets............................................. 20 14 49
Increase (decrease) in payables..................... 4 (258) (337)
Increase (decrease) in taxes accrued................ (18) 37 21
Increase (decrease) in interest accrued............. (7) (21) (6)
Increase (decrease) in natural gas pipeline revenue
reservation........................................ (103) 141 150
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities.... (21) (60) 130
Take-or-pay (refunds to customers) recoupments, net... 26 (34) 92
Other................................................. (87) (58) (115)
----- ----- -----
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations......... 32 277 414
Cash provided (used) by discontinued operations....... (3) (5) (7)
----- ----- -----
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities.......... 29 272 407
----- ----- -----
Investing Activities:
Net proceeds related to sale of discontinued operations. 5 -- --
Net proceeds from sale of investments and other assets.. 18 12 --
Expenditures for plant, property and equipment--
Continuing operations................................. (254) (172) (257)
Discontinued operations............................... (1) (2) (4)
Acquisitions of businesses.............................. (4) (10) (10)
(Increase) decrease in Tenneco Inc. receivables......... 203 716 356
Investments in affiliated companies and other........... 47 (161) (425)
----- ----- -----
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities.......... 14 383 (340)
----- ----- -----
Financing Activities:
Capital contribution from Tenneco Inc................... -- -- 100
Retirement of long-term debt............................ -- (795) (628)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt excluding
current maturities on long-term debt................... (123) (76) 152
Increase in notes payable to Tenneco Inc. .............. 181 -- --
Net increase (decrease) in advances from affiliated
companies.............................................. (101) 213 387
Dividends............................................... -- -- (75)
----- ----- -----
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities.......... (43) (658) (64)
----- ----- -----
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Temporary Cash
Investments.............................................. -- (3) 3
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments, January 1............ -- 3 --
----- ----- -----
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments, December 31 (Note)... $ -- $ -- $ 3
===== ===== =====
Cash Paid During the Year for Interest.................... $ 276 $ 271 $ 297
Cash Paid During the Year for Income Taxes (net of
refunds)................................................. $ 50 $ 15 $ 46
</TABLE>
--------
Note: Cash and temporary cash investments include highly liquid investments
with a maturity date of three months or less at date of purchase.
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
statements of cash flows.)
63
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
ASSETS 1994 1993
------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Receivables--
Customers................................................. $ 64 $ 37
Affiliated companies...................................... 207 156
Gas transportation and exchange........................... 178 199
Other..................................................... 50 31
Allowance for doubtful accounts........................... (11) (21)
Notes receivable from Tenneco Inc........................... -- 203
Inventories--
Raw materials, work in process and finished products...... 46 45
Materials and supplies.................................... 18 20
Gas stored underground...................................... -- 41
Deferred income taxes....................................... 18 --
Prepaid pension............................................. 55 42
Prepayments and other....................................... 54 49
------- -------
679 802
------- -------
Investments and Other Assets:
Investment in affiliated companies.......................... 11,697 11,234
Other....................................................... 288 367
------- -------
11,985 11,601
------- -------
Plant, Property and Equipment, at cost:
Natural gas pipelines....................................... 5,027 4,751
Automotive parts............................................ 285 291
------- -------
5,312 5,042
Less--Reserves for depreciation and amortization............ 3,207 3,154
------- -------
2,105 1,888
------- -------
$14,769 $14,291
======= =======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
balance sheets.)
64
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(MILLIONS)
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY 1994 1993
------------------------------------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities on long-term debt....................... $ 242 $ --
Notes payable to Tenneco Inc............................... 181 --
Subordinated demand note payable to Tenneco Corporation.... 4,495 4,618
Payables--
Trade and other.......................................... 178 159
Affiliated companies..................................... 17 53
Gas transportation and exchange.......................... 118 106
Taxes accrued.............................................. 54 93
Deferred income taxes...................................... -- 14
Interest accrued........................................... 35 40
Natural gas pipeline revenue reservation................... 187 290
Other...................................................... 143 143
------- -------
5,650 5,516
------- -------
Long-term Debt............................................... 748 983
------- -------
Advances from Affiliated Companies........................... 755 855
------- -------
Deferred Income Taxes........................................ 357 363
------- -------
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities....................... 300 228
------- -------
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholder's Equity:
Common stock, par value $5 per share, authorized, issued
and outstanding 200 shares................................ -- --
Premium on common stock and other capital surplus.......... 3,494 3,494
Cumulative translation adjustments......................... (174) (297)
Retained earnings.......................................... 3,639 3,149
------- -------
6,959 6,346
------- -------
$14,769 $14,291
======= =======
</TABLE>
(The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these
balance sheets.)
65
<PAGE>
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting Policies
The financial statements of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and
Consolidated Subsidiaries presented in this document.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company charged corporate overhead expenses to its
subsidiaries in the amount of $31 million, $36 million and $35 million for the
years 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Majority-owned subsidiaries and companies in which at least a 20% voting
interest is owned are carried at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings
since date of acquisition and cumulative translation adjustments. At December
31, 1994, equity in undistributed earnings and cumulative translation
adjustments amounted to $1,244 million and $(150) million, respectively; at
December 31, 1993, the corresponding amounts were $1,294 million and $(274)
million, respectively.
Dividends received from companies accounted for on an equity basis amounted
to $0, $32 million and $232 million for the years 1994, 1993 and 1992,
respectively.
Income Taxes
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company's pre-tax earnings from continuing operations
(excluding equity in net income from continuing operations of affiliated
companies) for the years 1994, 1993 and 1992 are principally domestic. The
differences between the U.S. income tax expense, reflected in the Statements of
Income (Loss), of $42 million, $61 million and $47 million for the years 1994,
1993 and 1992 and the income tax expense computed at the U.S. federal income
tax rate of $247 million, $243 million and $119 million, respectively,
consisted principally of the tax effect of equity in net income from continuing
operations of affiliated companies.
Long-Term Debt and Current Maturities
The aggregate maturities and sinking fund requirements applicable to the
long-term debt issues outstanding at December 31, 1994, are $242 million, $250
million and $325 million for 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively, and $0 for 1998
and 1999.
Financial Instruments
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company has agreed to cause and enable Newport News
Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary) to perform its
covenants and agreements under certain major shipbuilding contracts.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company has guaranteed the performance of certain
affiliates pursuant to arrangements under which receivables are factored on a
nonrecourse basis with Tenneco Credit Corporation.
(The preceding notes are an integral part of the foregoing financial
statements.)
66
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(MILLIONS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS
-----------------
CHARGED
BALANCE AT TO COSTS CHARGED BALANCE
BEGINNING AND TO OTHER DEDUCTIONS AT END
DESCRIPTION OF YEAR EXPENSES ACCOUNTS (NOTE) OF YEAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts Deducted from
Assets to Which it Applies:
Year Ended December 31,
1994...................... $66 $16 $ 2 $36 $48
=== === === === ===
Year Ended December 31,
1993...................... $51 $39 $ 1 $25 $66
=== === === === ===
Year Ended December 31,
1992...................... $57 $22 $ 2 $30 $51
=== === === === ===
</TABLE>
--------
NOTE: For 1994, 1993 and 1992, primarily uncollectible accounts written off,
net of recoveries on accounts previously written off. For 1994, the
result of the reorganization and sale of Case is included.
67
<PAGE>
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, the
Company did not file with the Securities and Exchange Commission any Current
Reports on Form 8-K.
EXHIBITS
Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by an
asterisk; all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference
to a prior filing as indicated.
<TABLE>
<C> <S>
*3(a) --Certificate of Incorporation as amended and supplemented as of
January 31, 1995.
3(b) --Copy of By-Laws of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company as amended
October 2, 1989 (Exhibit 3(b) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended
December 31, 1992, File No. 1-4101).
4 --Included in Exhibits 3(a) and 3(b).
9 --None.
10(b)(1) --Lease Agreement, Tomahawk, dated as of January 30, 1991, between
The Connecticut National Bank, as Owner Trustee, and Packaging
Corporation of America (Exhibit 10(b)(1) to Form 10-K of Tenneco
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-
9864).
10(b)(2) --Lease Agreement, Valdosta, dated as of January 30, 1991, between
The Connecticut National Bank, Philip G. Kane, Jr., Frank
McDonald, Jr., and William R. Monroe, as Owner Trustee, and
Packaging Corporation of America (Exhibit 10(b)(2) to Form 10-K
of Tenneco Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990, File
No. 1-9864).
10(b)(3) --Timberland Lease dated January 31, 1991, by and between Four
States Timber Venture and Packaging Corporation of America
(Exhibit 10(b)(3) to Form 10-K of Tenneco Inc. for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-9864).
11 --None.
12 --None.
13 --None.
16 --None.
18 --None.
21 --None.
22 --Omitted pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by
General Instruction J to Form 10-K.
23 --None.
24 --None.
*27(a) --Financial Data Schedule.
*27(b) --Restated Financial Data Schedule for quarter ended September 30,
1994.
28 --None.
99 --None.
</TABLE>
UNDERTAKING.
The undersigned, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, hereby undertakes pursuant
to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4)(iii), to furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request all constituent instruments
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries not filed herewith for the reason
that the total amount of securities authorized under any of such instruments
does not exceed 10% of the total consolidated assets of Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
68
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED
ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
S. D. Chesebro'
By___________________________________
S. D. Chesebro',
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: March 30, 1995
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE
REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
S. D. Chesebro' March 30, 1995
------------------------------------
S. D. Chesebro' Principal Executive Officer
and Director
Robert T. Blakely March 30, 1995
------------------------------------
Robert T. Blakely Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer
Dana G. Mead March 30, 1995
------------------------------------
Dana G. Mead Director
</TABLE>
69
<PAGE>
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
3(a) --Copy of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as
amended and supplemented as of March 27, 1995.
*3(b) --Copy of By-Laws of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company as amended
October 2, 1989 (Exhibit 3(b) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended
December 31, 1992, File No. 1-4101).
*10(b)(1) --Lease Agreement, Tomahawk, dated as of January 30, 1991, between
The Connecticut National Bank, as Owner Trustee, and Packaging
Corporation of America (Exhibit 10(b)(1) to Form 10-K of Tenneco
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-9864).
*10(b)(2) --Lease Agreement, Valdosta, dated as of January 30, 1991, between
The Connecticut National Bank, Philip G. Kane, Jr., Frank McDonald,
Jr., and William R. Monroe, as Owner Trustee, and Packaging
Corporation of America (Exhibit 10(b)(2) to Form 10-K of Tenneco
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-9864).
*10(b)(3) --Timberland Lease dated January 31, 1991, by and between Four
States Timber Venture and Packaging Corporation of America (Exhibit
10(b)(3) to Form 10-K of Tenneco Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1990, File No.1-9864).
27(a) --Financial Data Schedule.
27(b) --Restated Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended September
30, 1994.
</TABLE>
--------
* Exhibit incorporated by reference.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 3(a)(3)
RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
ORIGINALLY INCORPORATED AS
TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY
ON
JUNE 9, 1947
This Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted pursuant to the
provisions of Sections 245 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.
FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (herein
sometimes referred to as the "Corporation").
SECOND: The address of its registered office in the state of Delaware is
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County
of New Castle. The name of its registered agent at such address is The
Corporation Trust Company.
THIRD: The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted is
to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized
under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.
FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have
authority to issue is two hundred (200) and the par value of each of such shares
is Five Dollars ($5.00) amounting in the aggregate to One Thousand Dollars
($1,000).
FIFTH: All corporate powers shall be exercised by the Board of Directors,
except as provided by statute or by this Certificate of Incorporation, as
amended.
The Board of Directors shall have the power to make, amend, alter, change, add
to or repeal by-laws for the Corporation, without any action on the part of the
stockholders. The by-laws made by the Board of Directors may be amended,
altered, changed, added to or repealed by the stockholders.
The number of directors of the Corporation shall be fixed from time to time by
the by-laws and may be altered as the by-laws provide.
SIXTH: The Corporation is to have perpetual existence.
SEVENTH: Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of
Delaware, as the by-laws may provide. The books of the Corporation may be kept
(subject to any provision contained in the statutes) outside the State of
Delaware at such
<PAGE>
place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors
or in the by-laws of the Corporation.
EIGHTH: The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal
any provision contained in this Certificate of Incorporation, in the manner now
or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders
herein are granted subject to this reservation.
NINTH: A director of this Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation
or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a
director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of
loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not
in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
the law, (iii) under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY has caused this
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and
attested by its Corporate Secretary, this 2nd day of November, 1992.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
[SEAL]
BY: /s/ R. C. Thomas
_____________________________
R. C. Thomas
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
ATTEST:
BY: /s/ Karl A. Stewart
--------------------------
Karl A. Stewart, Secretary
2
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATE OF
OWNERSHIP AND MERGER MERGING
TENNECO TURKIYE, INC.
INTO AND WITH
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:
FIRST: That it is the owner of all the issued and outstanding stock of TENNECO
TURKIYE, INC., a Delaware corporation, incorporated on August 20, 1973.
SECOND: That, in accordance with the provisions of Section 141(f) of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors of
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, by written consent, adopted the following
resolutions to merge TENNECO TURKIYE, INC. into and with TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE
COMPANY:
RESOLVED, that the Company merge into itself and it hereby does merge into
itself its wholly-owned subsidiary Tenneco Turkiye, Inc. and assume all of
said corporation's liabilities and obligations; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company be, and they hereby are,
authorized, empowered and directed to execute, under the corporate seal of the
Company, a Certificate of Ownership and Merger setting forth a copy of the
resolutions to merge said Tenneco Turkiye, Inc. into the Company, pursuant to
which the Company will assume all of the liabilities and obligations of the
said Tenneco Turkiye, Inc., and to cause the same to be filed, in the manner
provided by law, and to do all acts and things whatsoever, whether within or
without the State of Delaware, which may be in anywise necessary or proper to
effect said merger.
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY has caused its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and this Certificate to be signed by E. J.
Milan, its Vice President, and James D. Gaughan, its Assistant Secretary, as of
February 2, 1993.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
BY: /s/ E. J. Milan
-----------------------------
E. J. Milan, Vice President
ATTEST:
/s/ James D. Gaughan
----------------------------
James D. Gaughan
Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATE OF
OWNERSHIP AND MERGER MERGING
TENNECO CHINA TRADE INC.
AND
TENNECO INTERNATIONAL MARKETING & SOURCING, INC.
INTO AND WITH
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:
FIRST: That it is the owner of all the issued and outstanding stock of
TENNECO CHINA TRADE INC., a Delaware corporation, incorporated on January 10,
1986; and TENNECO INTERNATIONAL MARKETING & SOURCING, INC., a Delaware
corporation, incorporated on July 16, 1985.
SECOND: That, in accordance with the provisions of Section 141(f) of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors of
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, by written consent dated as of January 17, 1995,
adopted the following resolutions to merge TENNECO CHINA TRADE INC. and TENNECO
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING & SOURCING, INC. into and with TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE
COMPANY:
RESOLVED, that the Company merge into itself and it hereby does merge
into itself its wholly-owned subsidiary Tenneco China Trade Inc. and
assume all of said corporation's liabilities and obligations; and it is
further
RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company be, and they hereby
are, authorized, empowered and directed to execute, under the corporate
seal of the Company, a Certificate of Ownership and Merger setting forth
a copy of the resolutions to merge said Tenneco China Trade Inc. into the
Company, pursuant to which the Company will assume all of the liabilities
and obligations of the said Tenneco China Trade Inc., and to cause the
same to be filed, in the manner provided by law, and to do
<PAGE>
all acts and things whatsoever, whether within or without the State of
Delaware, which may be in anywise necessary or proper to effect said
merger.
* * *
RESOLVED, that the Company merge into itself and it hereby does merge
into itself its wholly-owned subsidiary Tenneco International Marketing &
Sourcing, Inc. and assume all of said corporation's liabilities and
obligations; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company be, and they hereby
are, authorized, empowered and directed to execute, under the corporate
seal of the Company, a Certificate of Ownership and Merger setting forth
a copy of the resolutions to merge said Tenneco International Marketing &
Sourcing, Inc. into the Company, pursuant to which the Company will
assume all of the liabilities and obligations of the said Tenneco
International Marketing & Sourcing, Inc., and to cause the same to be
filed, in the manner provided by law, and to do all acts and things
whatsoever, whether within or without the State of Delaware, which may be
in anywise necessary or proper to effect said merger.
2
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY has caused its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and this Certificate to be signed by
Robert G. Simpson, its Vice President, and James D. Gaughan, its Assistant
Secretary, as of January 31, 1995.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
By: [SIGNATURE OF ROBERT G. SIMPSON
APPEARS HERE]
-------------------------------
Robert G. Simpson
Vice President
ATTEST:
[SIGNATURE OF JAMES D. GAUGHAN
APPEARS HERE]
------------------------------
James D. Gaughan,
Assistant Secretary
3
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries Financial
Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1994
<CASH> 459
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 644
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 909
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 6,232
<PP&E> 11,009
<DEPRECIATION> 5,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 13,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,793
<BONDS> 793
<COMMON> 0
0
0
<OTHER-SE> 6,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 13,230
<SALES> 8,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 8,676
<CGS> 6,781
<TOTAL-COSTS> 6,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 954
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 265
<INCOME-PRETAX> 956
<INCOME-TAX> 290
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 665
<DISCONTINUED> (162)
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> (13)
<NET-INCOME> 490
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries Financial
Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END> SEP-30-1994
<CASH> 413
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 694
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 812
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 5,896
<PP&E> 10,484
<DEPRECIATION> 5,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 12,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,866
<BONDS> 874
<COMMON> 0
0
0
<OTHER-SE> 6,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 12,778
<SALES> 6,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 6,646
<CGS> 5,243
<TOTAL-COSTS> 5,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 711
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 199
<INCOME-PRETAX> 717
<INCOME-TAX> 282
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 435
<DISCONTINUED> 5
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> (13)
<NET-INCOME> 427
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
