As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 1999
Registration No. 333-45335
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------------------------
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
---------------------------
SOFTNET SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 11-1817252
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
650 Townsend Street, Suite 225
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 365-2500
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant's principal executive offices)
Dr. Lawrence B. Brilliant
Chief Executive Officer and President
SoftNet Systems, Inc.
650 Townsend Street, Suite 225
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 365-2500
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area
code, of agent for service)
---------------------------
Copy to: Scott Lester, Esq.
Spear Street Tower
One Market
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 442-0900
---------------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: From time
to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
---------------------------
If the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered pursuant
to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box. /__/
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a
delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box. /X/
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant
to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list
the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering./__/
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under
the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering./ /
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE
OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT
SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SEC, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY
DETERMINE.
<PAGE>
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form
S-3, Registration No. 333-45335 (the "Registration Statement") is being filed
pursuant to Rule 414 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act") by SoftNet Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("SoftNet
Delaware"), as the successor to SoftNet Systems, Inc., a New York corporation
(the "Company"). On April 13, 1999, the shareholders of the Company approved the
reincorporation of the Company in the state of Delaware through the merger of
the Company with and into SoftNet Delaware, which merger was effected on April
14, 1999. Pursuant to Rule 414(d) under the Securities Act, SoftNet Delaware, as
successor to the Company, hereby adopts the Registration Statement as its own
registration statement for all purposes of the Securities Act and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MAY 21, 1999
PROSPECTUS
SOFTNET SYSTEMS, INC.
2,697,320 Shares of Common Stock
The stockholders of SoftNet Systems, Inc. described on page 24 are
offering and selling up to 2,697,320 shares of SoftNet common stock under this
prospectus. SoftNet will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of
SoftNet common stock by the selling stockholders.
The SoftNet common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol "SOFN." On May 20, the last reported sales price of the SoftNet
common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $30.125 per share.
------------------------------------------
You should carefully consider the risk factors beginning on
page 1 of this prospectus before purchasing any of the SoftNet common
stock being offered by the selling stockholders.
------------------------------------------
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities
or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this Prospectus is May 21, 1999.
------------------------------------------
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer
to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
RISK FACTORS............................................................. 1
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION...................................... 23
USE OF PROCEEDS.......................................................... 24
THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS................................................. 24
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION..................................................... 28
LEGAL.................................................................... 29
EXPERTS.................................................................. 29
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones that
we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading
price of our common stock could decline. In such case, the trading price of our
common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
We cannot assure you that we will be profitable because we have operated our
Internet services business only for a short period of time
We are in the process of selling our non-Internet related subsidiaries
to focus on substantial expansion of our Internet subsidiary, ISP Channel, Inc.
We cannot assure you that our ability to develop or maintain strategies and
business operations for the ISP Channel services will achieve positive cash flow
and profitability. We acquired ISP Channel, Inc. in June 1996. As such, we have
very limited operating history and experience in the Internet services business.
The successful expansion of the ISP Channel services will require strategies and
business operations that differ from those we have historically employed. To be
successful, we must develop and market products and services that are widely
accepted by consumers and businesses at prices that provide cash flow sufficient
to meet our debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements.
Our business may fail if the industry as a whole fails or our products and
services do not gain commercial acceptance
It has become feasible to offer Internet services over existing cable
lines and equipment on a broad scale only recently. There is no proven
commercial acceptance of cable-based Internet services and none of the companies
offering such services are currently profitable. It is currently very difficult
to predict whether providing cable-modem Internet services will become a viable
industry.
The success of the ISP Channel service will depend upon the willingness
of new and existing cable subscribers to pay the monthly fees and installation
costs associated with the service and to purchase or lease the equipment
necessary to access the Internet. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether our
pricing model will prove to be viable, whether demand for our services will
materialize at the prices we expect to charge, or whether current or future
pricing levels will be sustainable. If we do not achieve or sustain such pricing
levels or if our services do not achieve or sustain broad market acceptance,
then our business, financial condition, and prospects will be materially
adversely affected.
Our continued negative cash flow and net losses may depress stock prices
Our continued negative cash flow and net losses may result in depressed
market prices for our common stock. We cannot assure you that we will ever
achieve favorable operating results or profitability. We have sustained
substantial losses over the last five fiscal years. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1998, we had a net loss of $17.3 million and for the six months
ended March 31, 1999, we had a net loss of $14.5 million. As of March 31, 1999,
<PAGE>
we had an accumulated shareholders' deficit of approximately $10.9 million. We
expect to incur substantial additional losses and experience substantial
negative cash flows as we expand the ISP Channel service. The costs of expansion
will include expenses incurred in connection with:
o inducing cable affiliates to enter into exclusive multi-year
contracts with us;
o installing the equipment necessary to enable our cable affiliates
to offer our services;
o research and development of new product and service offerings;
o the continued development of our direct and indirect selling and
marketing efforts; and
o possible charges related to acquisitions, divestitures, business
alliances or changing technologies, including the acquisition of
Intelligent Communications, Inc.
If we do not achieve cash flows sufficient to support our operations, we may be
unable to implement our business plan
The development of our business will require substantial capital
infusions as a result of:
o our need to enhance and expand product and service offerings to
maintain our competitive position and increase market share; and
o the substantial investment in equipment and corporate resources
required by the continued national launching of the ISP Channel
service.
In addition, we anticipate that the majority of cable affiliates with
one-way cable systems will eventually upgrade their cable infrastructure to
two-way cable systems, at which time we will have to upgrade our equipment on
any affected cable system to handle two-way transmissions. We cannot accurately
predict whether or when we will ultimately achieve cash flow levels sufficient
to support our operations, development of new products and services, and
expansion of the ISP Channel service. Unless we reach such cash flow levels, we
will require additional financing to provide funding for operations. In the
event we complete a long-term debt financing, we will be highly leveraged and
such debt securities will have rights or privileges senior to those of our
current stockholders. In the event that equity securities are issued to raise
additional capital, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be
reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution and such securities may
have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common stock. In
the event that we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or are
unable to borrow or otherwise obtain additional funds on favorable terms to
finance operations when needed, our business, financial condition, and prospects
would be materially adversely affected.
The unpredictability of our quarter-to-quarter results may adversely affect the
trading price of our common stock
We cannot predict with any significant degree of certainty our
quarter-to-quarter operating results. As a result, we believe that
period-to-period comparisons of our revenues and results of operations are not
necessarily meaningful and you should not rely upon them as indicators of future
performance. It is likely that in one or more future quarters our results may
fall below the expectations of analysts and investors. In such event, the
trading price of our common stock would likely decrease. Many of the factors
that cause our quarter-to-quarter operating results to be unpredictable are
largely beyond our control.
These factors include, among others:
o the number of subscribers who retain our Internet services;
o our ability and that of our cable affiliates to coordinate timely
and effective marketing strategies, in particular, our strategy
for marketing the ISP Channel service to subscribers in such
affiliates' local cable areas;
<PAGE>
o the rate at which our cable affiliates can complete the
installations required to initiate service for new subscribers;
o the amount and timing of capital expenditures and other costs
relating to the expansion of the ISP Channel service;
o competition in the Internet or cable industries; and
o changes in law and regulation.
We will record an expense related to our issuance of stock options pursuant to
our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan that may have a negative impact on our financial
condition
Between October 1998 and March 1999, we granted stock options under our
1998 Stock Incentive Plan. Because the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan was not adopted
until our annual meeting of stockholders held in April 1999, we are required to
recognize a compensation expense equal to the excess of the fair market price on
the date of stockholder approval over the exercise price of the committed option
grants. The compensation expense is approximately $82 million and will be
recognized over the vesting period of the options. The expense may have a
negative impact on our financial condition.
Existing contractual obligations allow for additional issuances of common stock
upon a market price decline, which could further adversely affect the market
price for our common stock
The total number of shares of our common stock underlying all of our
convertible securities, assuming the maximum amounts that we could be obligated
to issue without our consent, including common stock underlying unvested stock
options and grants made under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, is 7,634,348, which
would have been 42.3% of our outstanding common stock as of March 31, 1999
assuming such shares would have been issued as of such date. The issuance of
common stock as a result of these obligations could result in immediate and
substantial dilution to the holders of our common stock. We are obligated to
issue up to 4,216,761 shares of our common stock on the exercise of warrants and
options and the conversion of certain of our convertible debt. Our preferred
stock and 9% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2001 could convert into
an additional 3,417,587 shares of common stock without our consent. However, we
do not know the exact number of shares of our common stock that we will issue
upon conversion of these securities because they potentially have floating
conversion prices based on the average market prices of the common stock for a
number of trading days immediately prior to conversion.
The floating conversion price feature of the Series C Preferred Stock
and 9% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2001 begin May 31, 1999 and
July 1, 1999, respectively. Generally, decreases in the market price of the
common stock below their initial conversion prices would result in more shares
of common stock being issued upon their conversion.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of the outstanding preferred stock and our 9% senior
subordinated convertible notes due 2001 and percentage ownership (as determined
in accordance with the rules of the SEC) that each represents assuming:
o the market price of the common stock is 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of
the market price of the common stock on March 31, 1999, which was
$36.63 per share;
o the floating conversion price feature of the preferred stock and
9% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2001 was in effect;
o the maximum conversion prices of the preferred stock was not
adjusted as provided in our certificate of incorporation;
o the conversion price was equal to the market price at the time of
conversion in the event the market price was less than the maximum
conversion price; and
<PAGE>
o the 1,717,587 share limit with respect to the 9% senior
subordinated convertible notes was not in effect. See "Risks
associated with 9% senior subordinated convertible note
financing."
On March 31, 1999, there were 10,417,866 shares of common stock,
7,625.39 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and $12,000,000 principal amount
under the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2001 outstanding. In the
event that more than 2,000,000 shares of common stock would be required to fully
convert the Series C Preferred Stock, we must either honor conversion requests
over the 2,000,000 share limit or redeem the remaining Series C Preferred Stock
for cash, at its stated value of $1,000 per share plus accrued but unpaid
dividends.
Series C 9% Senior Subordinated
Preferred Stock Convertible Notes Total
--------------- ------------------ ---------------------
Percentage of Shares Shares Shares
Market Price Underlying % Underlying % Underlying %
- ------------- ---------- - ---------- - ---------- -
25% ($9.16) 847,266 7.5 1,310,044 11.2 2,157,310 17.2
50% ($18.32) 847,266 7.5 705,882 6.4 1,553,148 13.0
75% ($24.47) 847,266 7.5 705,882 6.4 1,553,148 13.0
100% ($36.63) 847,266 7.5 705,882 6.4 1,553,148 13.0
Dilution may result in a decrease in the market price of our common
stock
To the extent any of these shares of common stock are issued, the
market price of our common stock may decrease because of the additional shares
on the market. If the actual price of the common stock decreases, the holders of
our preferred stock and 9% senior subordinated convertible notes could convert
into greater amounts of common stock, the sales of which could further depress
the stock price. In addition, any significant downward pressure on the market
price of the common stock that may be caused by the holders of the preferred
stock or 9% senior subordinated convertible notes converting and selling
material amounts of common stock could encourage short sales by such holders or
others. Such short sales could place further downward pressure on the price of
our common stock. There are several factors that influence the market price of
our common stock. See " - Our stock price is volatile."
The ownership limitations in our certificate of incorporation may not
protect against dilution
Our certificate of incorporation and the terms of our 9% senior
subordinated convertible notes due 2001 do not allow us to issue shares of our
common stock to holders of our preferred stock or 9% senior subordinated
convertible notes, respectively, if such issuance would result in such holders
beneficially owning more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock. The 4.99%
ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from converting into common
stock and then selling such common stock to stay below the limitation.
Risks associated with 9% senior subordinated convertible note financing
The agreements with the purchasers of the 9% senior subordinated
convertible notes and warrants contain terms and covenants that could result in
substantial dilution to our stockholders. The financing could also make future
financings and loans and merger and acquisition activities more difficult and
could require us to expend substantial amounts of cash in order to satisfy our
obligations under the financing agreements.
Restrictions on Mergers and Consolidations
Certain provisions could discourage some potential purchasers by making
an acquisition of our Company or an asset sale more difficult and expensive,
including:
<PAGE>
o participation by the holders of the 9% senior
subordinated convertible notes due 2001 with the
holders of the common stock in the proceeds of a
merger or consolidation with a public company as
if the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes
due 2001 were fully converted into common stock on
the trading day immediately preceding the public
announcement of such merger or consolidation;
o similar participation by the holders of the
related warrants in the event our merger or
consolidation with another company would
constitute a dilutive event under the terms of the
warrants; and
o prohibition against selling or transferring all or
substantially all of our assets without prior
approval of the holders of the 9% senior
subordinated convertible notes due 2001.
Certain covenants made and default provisions agreed to, in connection
with the issuance of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes may also have
the effect of limiting our ability to obtain additional financing and issue
other securities. We have also agreed, until July 1, 1999, to grant the holders
of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes a right of first refusal with
respect to certain issuances of common stock or securities convertible,
exchangeable or exercisable for common stock. In addition, we are prohibited
from obtaining additional senior indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of an
aggregate of $12.0 million unless such indebtedness expressly provides that it
is not senior or superior to the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes.
Conversion of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes would result
in dilution to the holders of our common stock
After six months from the date of issuance, the 9% senior subordinated
convertible notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at variable
rates based on future trading prices of our common stock and on events that may
occur in the future. The number of shares of common stock that may ultimately be
issued upon conversion is therefore presently indeterminable and could fluctuate
significantly based on the issuance by us of other securities. The 9% senior
subordinated convertible notes and related warrants also have anti-dilution
protection and may require the issuance of more shares than originally
anticipated. These factors may result in substantial future dilution to the
holders of our common stock.
Certain provisions of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes may
have negative accounting consequences
In addition to the foregoing, the cross default provisions to our debt
instruments and other terms of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes,
under certain circumstances, could lead to a significant accounting charge to
earnings and could materially adversely affect our business, results of
operations and condition. Such a charge and potential other future charges
relating to the provisions of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes
financing agreements may negatively impact our earnings (loss) per share and the
market price of our common stock both currently and in future periods. The
convertibility features of such 9% senior subordinated convertible notes and
subsequent sales of the common stock underlying both it and the warrants could
materially adversely affect our valuation and the market trading price of our
shares of common stock.
We may be required to make cash payments to the holders of the 9%
senior subordinated convertible notes
In addition, the terms of the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes
prohibit their holders from converting such notes into more than 1,717,587
shares of our common stock. In the event that we cannot honor conversions of the
9% senior subordinated convertible notes because they would result in greater
than an aggregate of 1,717,587 shares of common stock being issued upon such
conversions, then we must convert such outstanding principal amount up to the
1,717,587 limit and prepay the remaining outstanding principal amount.
We may be required to prepay the 9% senior subordinated convertible
notes if:
o the holders of the 9% senior subordinated
convertible notes have already converted into
1,717,587 shares of common stock and there remains
a balance of such notes unconverted; or
<PAGE>
o the holders of the 9% senior subordinated
convertible notes cannot otherwise convert or
resell the common stock issued upon conversion.
Such cash payments would adversely affect our financial condition and
ability to implement the business plan for ISP Channel, Inc. In addition, we
would be required to raise funds elsewhere, and we cannot assure you that we
would be able to obtain adequate sources of additional capital.
We would not reach the 1,717,587 share limit unless the floating
conversion price feature were in effect and the market price of the common stock
fell below $6.99. In addition, if the holders of the 9% senior subordinated
convertible notes cannot convert or resell the common stock issued upon
conversion other than because the 1,717,587 share limit is reached, the terms of
the 9% senior subordinated convertible notes, in addition to other remedies,
permit the holders to require us to make cash payments. The maximum amount of
such cash payments, assuming the market price and the conversion price were
equal, is $13,440,000, without taking into account any interest that would
accrue. If the market price and the conversion price are not equal, then the
maximum amount of such cash payments could be significantly higher.
We may not be able to successfully implement our business plan if our
relationship with our cable affiliates is negatively impacted
The success of our business depends upon our relationship with our
cable affiliates. Therefore, our success and future business growth will be
substantially affected by economic and other factors affecting our cable
affiliates.
We do not have direct contact with our subscribers
Because subscribers to the ISP Channel service must subscribe through a
cable affiliate, the cable affiliate (and not us) will substantially control the
customer relationship with the subscriber. For example, under many of our
existing contracts, cable affiliates are responsible for important functions,
such as billing for and collecting ISP Channel subscription fees and providing
the labor and costs associated with distribution of local marketing materials.
Failure or delay by cable operators to upgrade their systems may
adversely affect subscription levels
Certain ISP Channel services are dependent on the quality of the cable
networks of our cable affiliates. Currently, most cable systems are capable of
providing only information from the Internet to the subscribers, and require a
telephone line to carry information from the subscriber to the Internet. These
systems are called "one-way" cable systems. Several cable operators have
announced and begun making upgrades to their systems to increase the capacity of
their networks and to enable traffic both to and from the Internet over their
networks, so-called "two-way capability." However, cable system operators have
limited experience with implementing such upgrades. These investments have
placed a significant strain on the financial, managerial, operational and other
resources of cable system operators, many of which already maintain a
significant amount of debt.
Further, cable operators must periodically renew their franchises with
city, county or state governments. These governmental bodies may impose
technical and managerial conditions before granting a renewal, and these
conditions may adversely affect the cable operator's ability to implement such
upgrades.
In addition, many cable operators may emphasize increasing television
programming capacity to compete with other forms of entertainment delivery
systems, such as direct broadcast satellite, instead of upgrading their networks
for two-way Internet capability. Such upgrades have been, and we expect will
continue to be, subject to change, delay or cancellation. Cable operators'
failure to complete these upgrades in a timely and satisfactory manner, or at
all, would adversely affect the market for our products and services in any such
operators' franchise area. In addition, cable operators may roll-out Internet
access systems that are incompatible with our high-speed Internet access
services. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and prospects.
<PAGE>
The unavailability of two-way capability in certain markets may negatively
affect subscription levels
We provide Internet services to both one-way and two-way cable systems.
For one-way cable systems, subscribers receive Internet services over cable
systems and transmit data to the Internet using a telephone line return path. In
those circumstances, our services may not provide the high speed access, quality
of experience and availability of certain applications necessary to attract and
retain subscribers to the ISP Channel service. Subscribers using a conventional
telephone line return path will experience upstream data transmission speeds to
the Internet that are provided by their analog modems which is typically 56 kbps
or less. It is not clear what impact the lack of two-way capability will have on
subscription levels for the ISP Channel service.
If we do not obtain exclusive access to cable subscribers, we may not be able to
sustain any meaningful growth
The success of the ISP Channel service is dependent, in part, on our
ability to gain exclusive access to cable consumers. Our ability to gain
exclusive access to cable customers depends upon our ability to develop
exclusive relationships with cable operators that are dominant within their
geographic markets. We cannot assure you that affiliated cable operators will
not face competition in the future or that we will be able to establish and
maintain exclusive relationships with cable affiliates. Currently, a number of
our contracts with cable operators do not contain exclusivity provisions. Even
if we are able to establish and maintain exclusive relationships with cable
operators, we cannot assure the ability to do so on favorable terms or in
sufficient quantities to be profitable. In addition, we will be excluded from
providing Internet over cable in those areas served by cable operators with
exclusive arrangements with other Internet service providers. Our contracts with
cable affiliates typically range from three to seven years, and we cannot assure
you that such contracts will be renewed on satisfactory terms. If the exclusive
relationship between either us and our cable affiliates or between our cable
affiliates and their cable subscribers is impaired, if we do not become
affiliated with a sufficient number of cable operators, or if we are not able to
continue our relationship with a cable affiliate once the initial term of its
contract has expired, our business, financial condition and prospects could be
materially adversely affected.
Failure to increase revenues from new products and services, whether due to lack
of market acceptance, competition, technological change or otherwise, would have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects
We expect to continue extensive research and development activities and
to evaluate new product and service opportunities. These activities will require
our continued investment in research and development and sales and marketing,
which could adversely affect our short-term results of operations. We believe
that future revenue growth and profitability will depend in part on our ability
to develop and successfully market new products and services. Failure to
increase revenues from new products and services, whether due to lack of market
acceptance, competition, technological change or otherwise, would have a
material adverse effect on our business financial condition and prospects.
If we fail to manage our expanding business effectively, our business, financial
condition and prospects could be adversely affected
To exploit fully the market for our products and services, we must
rapidly execute our sales strategy while managing anticipated growth through the
use of effective planning and operating procedures. To manage our anticipated
growth, we must, among other things:
o continue to develop and improve our operational, financial and
management information systems;
o hire and train additional qualified personnel;
o continue to expand and upgrade core technologies; and
o effectively manage multiple relationships with various
customers, suppliers and other third parties.
<PAGE>
Consequently, such expansion could place a significant strain on our
services and support operations, sales and administrative personnel and other
resources. We may, in the future, also experience difficulties meeting demand
for our products and services. Additionally, if we are unable to provide
training and support for our products, it will take longer to install our
products and customer satisfaction may be lower. We cannot assure that our
systems, procedures or controls will be adequate to support our operations or
that management will be able to exploit fully the market for our products and
services. Our failure to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.
If cable affiliates are unable to renew their franchises or we are unable to
affiliate with replacement operators, our business, financial condition and
prospects could be materially adversely affected
Cable television companies operate under non-exclusive franchises
granted by local or state authorities that are subject to renewal and
renegotiation from time to time. A franchise is generally granted for a fixed
term ranging from five to 15 years, but in many cases the franchise may be
terminated if the franchisee fails to comply with the material provisions of the
franchise. The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992
prohibits franchising authorities from granting exclusive cable television
franchises and from unreasonably refusing to award additional competitive
franchises. This Act also permits municipal authorities to operate cable
television systems in their communities without franchises. We cannot assure
that cable television companies having contracts with us will retain or renew
their franchises. Non-renewal or termination of any such franchises would result
in the termination of our contract with the applicable cable operator. If an
affiliated cable operator were to lose its franchise, we would seek to affiliate
with the successor to the franchisee. We cannot, however, assure an affiliation
with such successor. In addition, affiliation with a successor could result in
additional costs to us. If we cannot affiliate with replacement cable operators,
our business, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely
affected.
We may lose cable affiliates through their acquisition which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects
Under many of our contracts, if a cable affiliate is acquired and the
acquiring company chooses not to enter into a contract with us, we may lose our
ability to offer Internet services in the area served by such former cable
affiliate entirely or on an exclusive basis. Such a loss could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.
We depend on third-party technology to develop and introduce technology we use
and the absence of or any significant delay in the replacement of third-party
technology would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and prospects
The markets for the products and services we use are characterized by
the following:
o intense competition;
o rapid technological advances;
o evolving industry standards;
o changes in subscriber requirements;
o frequent new product introductions and
enhancements; and
o alternative service offerings.
Because of these factors, we have chosen to rely upon third parties to
develop and introduce technologies that enhance our current product and service
offerings. If our relationship with such third parties is impaired or
terminated, then we would have to find other developers on a timely basis or
develop our own technology. We cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain
the third-party technology necessary for continued development and introduction
<PAGE>
of new and enhanced products and services. In addition, we cannot predict
whether we will obtain third-party technology on commercially reasonable terms
or replace third-party technology in the event such technology becomes
unavailable, obsolete or incompatible with future versions of our products or
services. The absence of or any significant delay in the replacement of third-
party technology would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and prospects.
We depend on third-party suppliers for certain key products and services and any
inability to obtain sufficient key components or to develop alternative sources
for such components could result in delays or reductions in our product
shipments
We currently depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain key
products and services. In particular, we depend on Excite, Inc. for national
content aggregation, 3Com Corporation and Com21, Inc. for headend and cable
modem equipment, Cisco Systems, Inc. for specific network routing and switching
equipment, and, among others, MCIWorldCom, Inc. for national Internet backbone
services. Excite recently announced that it is being acquired by one of our
primary competitors, @Home. If, due to this acquisition, Excite were to
terminate its contract with us prior to the contract's expiration in November
1999, or not to extend the contract at that time, we would need to find a new
provider of national content aggregation. Additionally, certain of our cable
modem and headend equipment suppliers are in litigation over their patents. We
could experience disruptions in the delivery or increases in the prices of
products and services purchased from vendors as a result of this intellectual
property litigation. We cannot predict when delays in the delivery of key
components and other products may occur due to shortages resulting from the
limited number of suppliers, the financial or other difficulties of such
suppliers or the possible limited availability in the suppliers' underlying raw
materials. In addition, we may not have adequate remedies against such third
parties as a result of breaches of their agreements with us. The inability to
obtain sufficient key components or to develop alternative sources for such
components could result in delays or reductions in our product shipments. If
that were to happen, it could have a material adverse effect on our customer
relationships, business, financial condition, and prospects.
We depend on third-party carriers to maintain their cable systems which carry
our data and any interruption of our operations due to the failure to maintain
their cable systems would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and prospects
Our success will depend upon the capacity, reliability and security of
the network used to carry data between our subscribers and the Internet. A
significant portion of such network is owned by third parties, and accordingly
we have no control over its quality and maintenance. We rely on cable operators
to maintain their cable systems. In addition, we rely on other third parties to
provide a connection from the cable system to the Internet. Currently, we have
transit agreements with MCIWorldCom, Sprint, and others to support the exchange
of traffic between our network operations center, cable system and the Internet.
The failure of any other link in the delivery chain resulting in an interruption
of our operations would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and prospects.
Any increase in competition could reduce our gross margins, require increased
spending by us on research and development and sales and marketing, and
otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and
prospects
The markets for our products and services are intensely competitive,
and we expect competition to increase in the future. Many of our competitors and
potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and
marketing resources, larger subscriber bases, longer operating histories,
greater name recognition and more established relationships with advertisers and
content and application providers than we do. Such competitors may be able to
undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing
policies and devote substantially more resources to developing Internet services
or online content than we can. Our ability to compete may be further impeded if,
as evidenced by the recent merger between AT&T and TCI and the pending merger
between AT&T and MediaOne, competitors utilizing different or the same
technologies seek to merge to enhance their competitive strengths. We cannot
predict whether we will be able to compete successfully against current or
future competitors or that competitive pressures faced by us will not materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition, prospects or ability to
repay our debts. Any increase in competition could reduce our gross margins,
<PAGE>
require increased spending by us on research and development and sales and
marketing, and otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and prospects.
We face competition from many sources, which include:
o Other cable-based access providers;
o Telephone-based access providers; and
o Alternative technologies.
Cable-based access providers
In the cable-based segment of the Internet access industry, we compete
with other cable-based data services that are seeking to contract with cable
system operators. These competitors include:
o Systems integrators such as Convergence.com, Online
System Services, HSAnet and Frontier Communications'
Global Center business; and
o Internet service providers such as Earthlink
Network, Inc., MindSpring Enterprises, Inc., and IDT
Corporation.
Several cable system operators have begun to provide high-speed
Internet access services over their existing networks. The largest of these
cable system operators are CableVision, Comcast, Cox, MediaOne, TCI and Time
Warner. Comcast, Cox and TCI market through @Home, while Time Warner plans to
market the RoadRunner service through Time Warner's own cable systems as well as
to other cable system operators nationwide. In particular, @Home has announced
its intention to compete directly in the small- to medium-sized cable system
market.
Telephone-based access providers
Some of our most direct competitors in the access markets are
telephone-based access providers, including incumbent local exchange carriers,
national interexchange or long distance carriers, fiber-based competitive local
exchange carriers, ISPs, online service providers, wireless and satellite data
service providers, and local exchange carriers that use digital subscriber line
technologies. Some of these competitors are among the largest companies in the
country, including AT&T, MCIWorldCom, Sprint and Qwest. Other competitors
include BBN, Earthlink, Netcom, Concentric Network, and PSINet. The result is a
highly competitive and fragmented market.
Some of our potential competitors are offering diversified packages of
telecommunications services to residential customers. If these companies also
offer Internet access service, then we would be at a competitive disadvantage.
Many of these companies are offering (or may soon offer) technologies that will
attempt to compete with some or all of our Internet data service offerings. The
bases of competition in these markets include:
o transmission speed;
o security of transmission;
o reliability of service;
o ease of access;
o ratio of price to performance;
o ease of use;
o content quality;
<PAGE>
o quality of presentation;
o timeliness of content;
o customer support;
o brand recognition; and
o operating experience and revenue sharing.
Alternative technologies
In addition, the market for high-speed data transmission services is
characterized by several competing technologies that offer alternatives to
cable-modem service and conventional dial-up access. Competitive technologies
include telecom-related wireline technologies, such as integrated services
digital network ("ISDN") and digital subscriber line ("DSL") technologies, and
wireless technologies such as local multipoint distribution service,
multichannel multipoint distribution service and various types of satellite
services. Our prospects may be impaired by Federal Communications Commission
("FCC") rules and regulations, which are designed, at least in part, to increase
competition in video and related services. The FCC has also created a General
Wireless Communications Service in which licensees are afforded broad latitude
in defining the nature and service area of the communications services they
offer. The full impact of the General Wireless Communications Service remains to
be seen. Nevertheless, all of these new technologies pose potential competition
to our business. Significant market acceptance of alternative solutions for
high-speed data transmission could decrease the demand for our services.
We cannot predict whether and to what extent technological developments
will have a material adverse effect on our competitive position. The rapid
development of new competing technologies and standards increases the risk that
current or new competitors could develop products and services that would reduce
the competitiveness of our products and services. If that were to happen, it
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
prospects.
A perceived or actual failure by us to achieve or maintain high speed data
transmission could significantly reduce consumer demand for our services and
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
prospects
Because the ISP Channel service has been operational for a relatively
short period of time, our ability to connect and manage a substantial number of
online subscribers at high transmission speeds is unknown. In addition, we face
risks related to our ability to scale up to expected subscriber levels while
maintaining superior performance. While peak downstream data transmission speeds
across the cable network approaches 30 megabits per second in each 6 MHz
channel, the actual downstream data transmission speeds for each cable
subscriber will be significantly slower and will depend on a variety of factors,
including:
o actual speed provisioned for the subscriber's cable
modem;
o quality of the server used to deliver content;
o overall Internet traffic congestion;
o the number of active subscribers on a given 6 MHz
channel at the same time;
o the capability of cable modems used; and
o the service quality of the cable affiliates' cable
networks.
As the number of subscribers increases, it may be necessary for our
cable affiliates to add additional 6 MHz channels in order to maintain adequate
data transmission speeds from the Internet. These additions would render such
<PAGE>
channels unavailable to such cable affiliates for video or other programming. We
cannot assure you that our cable affiliates will provide additional capacity for
this purpose. On two-way cable systems, the transmission data channel to the
Internet is located in a range not used for broadcast by traditional cable
networks and is more susceptible to interference than the transmission data
channel from the Internet, resulting in a slower peak transmission speed to the
Internet. In addition to the factors affecting data transmission speeds from the
Internet, the interference level in the cable affiliates' data broadcast range
to the Internet can materially affect actual data transmission speeds to the
Internet. The actual data delivery speeds realized by subscribers will be
significantly lower than peak data transmission speeds and will vary depending
on the subscriber's hardware, operating system and software configurations. We
cannot assure you that we will be able achieve or maintain data transmission
speeds high enough to attract and retain our planned numbers of subscribers,
especially as the number of subscribers to our services grows. Consequently, a
perceived or actual failure by us to achieve or maintain high speed data
transmission could significantly reduce consumer demand for our services and
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
prospects.
Any damage or failure that causes interruptions in our operations could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects
Our operations are dependent upon our ability to support a highly
complex network and avoid damages from fires, earthquakes, floods, power losses,
telecommunications failures, network software flaws, transmission cable cuts and
similar events. The occurrence of any one of these events could cause
interruptions in the services we provide. In addition, the failure of an
incumbent local exchange carrier or other service provider to provide the
communications capacity we require, as a result of a natural disaster,
operational disruption or any other reason, could cause interruptions in the
services we provide. Any damage or failure that causes interruptions in our
operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and prospects.
We may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses and other
disruptive problems which may result in our liability to our subscribers and may
deter others from becoming subscribers
While we have taken substantial security measures, our networks or
those of our cable affiliates may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer
viruses and other disruptive problems. Internet service providers and online
service providers have experienced in the past, and may experience in the
future, interruptions in service as a result of the accidental or intentional
actions of Internet users. Unauthorized access by current and former employees
or others could also potentially jeopardize the security of confidential
information stored in our computer systems and those of our subscribers. Such
events may result in our liability to our subscribers and may deter others from
becoming subscribers, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and prospects. Although we intend to continue
using industry-standard security measures, such measures have been circumvented
in the past, and we cannot assure you that these measures will not be
circumvented in the future. Moreover, we have no control over the security
measures that our cable affiliates adopt. Eliminating computer viruses and
alleviating other security problems may cause our subscribers delays due to
interruptions or cessation of service. Such delays could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.
If the market for high-quality content fails to develop, or develops more slowly
than expected, our business, financial condition and prospects will be
materially adversely affected
A key part of our strategy is to provide Internet users a more
compelling interactive experience than the one currently available to customers
of dial-up Internet service providers and online service providers. We believe
that, in addition to providing high-speed, high-performance Internet access, to
be successful we must also develop and aggregate high-quality multimedia
content.
Our success in providing and aggregating such content will depend in part on:
o our ability to develop a customer base large enough
to justify investments in the development of such
content;
o the ability of content providers to create and
support high-quality multimedia content; and
<PAGE>
o our ability to aggregate content offerings in a
manner subscribers find attractive.
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in these endeavors.
In addition, the market for high-quality multimedia Internet content
has only recently begun to develop and is rapidly evolving, and there is
significant competition among Internet service providers and online service
providers for obtaining such content. If the market fails to develop, or
develops more slowly than expected, or if competition increases, or if our
content offerings do not achieve or sustain market acceptance, our business,
financial condition and prospects will be materially adversely affected.
Our failure to attract advertising revenues in quantities and at rates that are
satisfactory to us could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and prospects
The success of the ISP Channel service depends in part on our ability
to draw advertisers to the ISP Channel. We expect to derive significant revenues
from advertisements placed on co-branded and ISP Channel web pages and "click
through" revenues from products and services purchased through links from the
ISP Channel to vendors. We believe that we can leverage the ISP Channel to
provide demographic information to advertisers to help them better target
prospective customers. Nonetheless, we have not generated any significant
advertising revenue yet and we cannot assure you that advertisers will find such
information useful or will choose to advertise through the ISP Channel.
Therefore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract advertising
revenues in quantities and at rates that are satisfactory to us. The failure to
do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and prospects.
If we are unsuccessful in establishing and maintaining the ISP Channel brand, or
if we incur excessive expenses in promoting and maintaining our brand, our
business, financial condition and prospects would be materially adversely
affected
We believe that establishing and maintaining the ISP Channel brand are
critical to attract and expand our subscriber base. Promotion of the ISP Channel
brand will depend on several factors, including:
o our success in providing high-speed, high-quality
consumer and business Internet products, services
and content;
o the marketing efforts of our cable affiliates; and
o the reliability of our cable affiliates' networks
and services.
We cannot assure you that any of these factors will be achieved. We
have little control over our cable affiliates' marketing efforts or the
reliability of their networks and services.
If consumers and businesses do not perceive our existing products and
services as high quality or we introduce new products or services or enter into
new business ventures that are not favorably received by consumers and
businesses, then we will be unsuccessful in building brand recognition and brand
loyalty in the marketplace. In addition, to the extent that the ISP Channel
service is unavailable, we risk frustrating potential subscribers who are unable
to access our products and services.
Furthermore, we may need to devote substantial resources to create and
maintain a distinct brand loyalty among customers, to attract and retain
subscribers, and to promote and maintain the ISP Channel brand in a very
competitive market. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining the
ISP Channel brand or if we incur excessive expenses in promoting and maintaining
our brand, our business, financial condition and prospects would be materially
adversely affected.
<PAGE>
If we encounter significant problems with our billing and collections process,
our business, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely
affected
We have recently begun the process of designing and implementing our
billing and collections system for the ISP Channel service. We intend to bill
for our services over the Internet and, in most cases, to collect these invoices
through payments initiated via the Internet. Such invoices and payments have
security risks. Given the complexities of such a system, we cannot assure you
that we will be successful in developing and launching the system in a timely
manner or that we will be able to scale the system quickly and efficiently if
the number of subscribers requiring such a billing format increases. Currently,
our cable affiliates are responsible for billing and collection for our Internet
access services. As a result, we have little or no control over the accuracy and
timeliness of the invoices or over collection efforts.
Given our relatively limited history with billing and collection for
Internet services, we cannot predict the extent to which we may experience bad
debts or our ability to minimize such bad debts. If we encounter significant
problems with our billing and collections process, our business, financial
condition and prospects could be materially adversely affected.
We may face potential liability for defamatory or indecent content, which may
cause us to modify the way we provide services
Any imposition of liability on our company for information carried on
the Internet could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and prospects. The law relating to liability of Internet service
providers and online service providers for information carried on or
disseminated through their networks is currently unsettled. A number of lawsuits
have sought to impose such liability for defamatory speech and indecent
materials. Congress has attempted to impose such liability, in some
circumstances, for transmission of obscene or indecent materials. In one case, a
court has held that an online service providers could be found liable for
defamatory matter provided through its service, on the ground that the service
provider exercised active editorial control over postings to its service.
Because of the potential liability for materials carried on or disseminated
through our systems, we may have to implement measures to reduce our exposure to
such liability. Such measures may require the expenditure of substantial
resources or the discontinuation of certain products or services.
We may face potential liability for information retrieved and replicated that
may not be covered by our insurance
Our liability insurance may not cover potential claims relating to
providing Internet services or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all
liability that may be imposed. Any liability not covered by insurance or in
excess of insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and prospects. Because subscribers download and
redistribute materials that are cached or replicated by us in connection with
our Internet services, claims could be made against us or our cable affiliates
under both U.S. and foreign law for defamation, negligence, copyright or
trademark infringement, or other theories based on the nature and content of
such materials. You should know that these types of claims have been
successfully brought against online service providers. In particular, copyright
and trademark laws are evolving both domestically and internationally, and it is
uncertain how broadly the rights provided under these laws will be applied to
online environments. It is impossible for us to determine who the potential
rights holders may be with respect to all materials available through our
services. In addition, a number of third-party owners of patents have claimed to
hold patents that cover various forms of online transactions or online
technology. As with other online service providers, patent claims could be
asserted against us based upon our services or technologies.
Our success depends upon the development of new products and services in the
face of rapidly evolving technology
Our products and services may not be commercially successful
Our future development efforts may not result in commercially
successful products and services or our products and services may be rendered
obsolete by changing technology, new industry standards or new product
announcements by competitors.
<PAGE>
For example, we expect digital set-top boxes capable of supporting
high-speed Internet access services to be commercially available in the next 18
months. Set top boxes will enable subscribers to access the Internet without a
computer. Although the widespread availability of set-top boxes could increase
the demand for our Internet service, the demand for set-top boxes may never
reach the level we and industry experts have estimated. Even if set-top boxes do
reach this level of popularity, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
capitalize on such demand. If this scenario occurs or if other technologies or
standards applicable to our products or services become obsolete or fail to gain
widespread commercial acceptance, then our business, financial condition and
prospects will be materially adversely affected.
Our ability to adapt to changes in technology and industry standards,
and to develop and introduce new and enhanced products and service offerings,
will determine whether we can maintain or improve our competitive position and
our prospects for growth. However, the following factors may hinder our efforts
to introduce and sell new products and services:
o rapid technological changes in the Internet and
telecommunications industries;
o the lengthy product approval and purchase process of
our customers; and
o our reliance on third-party technology for the
development of new products and services.
Our suppliers' products may become obsolete, requiring us to purchase
additional inventory
The technology underlying our capital equipment, such as headends and
cable modems, continues to evolve and, accordingly, our equipment could become
out-of-date or obsolete prior to the time we originally intended to replace it.
If this occurs, we may need to purchase substantial amounts of new capital
equipment, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and prospects.
Our competitors' products may make our products less commercially
viable
The introduction by our competitors of products or services embodying,
or purporting to embody, new technology could also render our existing products
and services, as well as products or services under development, obsolete and
unmarketable. Internet, telecommunications and cable technologies are evolving
rapidly. Many large corporations, including large telecommunications providers,
regional Bell operating companies and telecommunications equipment providers, as
well as large cable system operators, regularly announce new and planned
technologies and service offerings that could impact the market for our
services. The announcements can delay purchasing decisions by our customers and
confuse the marketplace regarding available alternatives. Such announcements
could, in the future, adversely impact our business, financial condition and
prospects.
In addition, we cannot assure you that we will have the financial and
technical resources necessary to continue successful development of new products
or services based on emerging technologies. Moreover, due to intense
competition, there may be a time-limited market opportunity for our cable- based
consumer and business Internet services. Our services may not achieve widespread
acceptance before competitors offer products and services with speed and
performance similar to our current offerings. In addition, the widespread
adoption of new Internet or telecommuting technologies or standards, cable-based
or otherwise, could require substantial and costly modifications to our
equipment, products and services and could fundamentally alter the character,
viability and frequency of Internet-based advertising, either of which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
prospects.
Our purchase of Intelligent Communications, Inc. subjects us to risks in a new
market in which we have no experience
On February 9, 1999, we completed our purchase of Intelligent
Communications, Inc., a provider of two-way satellite Internet access options
using very small aperture terminal ("VSAT") technology. As with mergers
generally, this merger presents important challenges and risks. Achieving the
anticipated benefits of the merger will depend, in part, upon whether the
<PAGE>
integration of the two companies' businesses is achieved in an efficient,
cost-effective and timely manner, but we cannot assure that this will occur. The
successful combination of the two businesses will require, among other things,
the timely integration of the companies' product and service offerings and the
coordination of the companies' research and development efforts. Because we only
recently completed the acquisition of Intelligent Communications, we cannot
assure you that integration will be accomplished smoothly, on time or
successfully. Although the management teams of both SoftNet and Intelligent
Communications believe that the merger will benefit both companies, we cannot
assure you that the merger will be successful.
The purchase of Intelligent Communications involves other risks
including potential negative effects on our reported results of operations from
acquisition-related charges and amortization of acquired technology and other
intangible assets. As a result of the Intelligent Communications acquisition, we
anticipate recording a significant amount of intangible assets in the second
quarter of fiscal 1999 which will adversely affect our earnings and
profitability for the foreseeable future. If the amount of such recorded
intangible assets is increased or we have future losses and are unable to
demonstrate our ability to recover the amount of intangible assets recorded
during such time periods, the period of amortization could be shortened, which
may further increase annual amortization charges. In such event, our business
and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition,
the Intelligent Communications acquisition was structured as a purchase by us of
all of the outstanding stock of Intelligent Communications. As a result, we
could be adversely affected by direct and contingent liabilities of Intelligent
Communications. It is possible that we are not aware of all of the liabilities
of Intelligent Communications and that Intelligent Communications has greater
liabilities than we expected. In addition, we have very little experience in the
markets and technology in which Intelligent Communications is focused. As such,
we are faced with risks that are new to us, including the following:
Dependence on VSAT market
One of the reasons we purchased Intelligent Communications was to be
able to provide two-way satellite Internet access options to our customers using
VSAT satellite technology. However, the market for VSAT communications networks
and services may not continue to grow or VSAT technology may be replaced by an
alternative technology. A significant decline in this market or the replacement
of the existing VSAT technology by an alternative technology could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and prospects.
Risk of damage, loss or malfunction of satellite
The loss, damage or destruction of any of the satellites used by
Intelligent Communications, or a temporary or permanent malfunction of any of
these satellites, would likely result in interruption of Internet services we
provide over the satellites which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and prospects.
In addition, use of the satellites to provide Internet services
requires a direct line of sight between the satellite and the cable headend and
is subject to distance and rain attenuation. In certain markets which experience
heavy rainfall, transmission links must be engineered for shorter distances and
greater power to maintain transmission quality. Such engineering changes may
increase the cost of providing service. In addition, such engineering changes
may require FCC approval, and we cannot assure you that the FCC would grant such
approval.
Equipment failure and interruption of service
Our operations will require that our network, including the satellite
connections, operate on a continuous basis. It is not unusual for networks,
including switching facilities and satellite connections, to experience periodic
service interruption and equipment failures. It is therefore possible that the
network facilities we use may from time to time experience interruptions or
equipment failures, which would negatively affect consumer confidence as well as
our business operations and reputation.
Dependence on leases for satellites
Intelligent Communications currently leases satellite space from
General Electric. If for any reason, the leases were to be terminated, we cannot
assure you that we could renegotiate new leases with General Electric or another
satellite provider on favorable terms, if at all. We have not identified
<PAGE>
alternative providers and believe that any new leases would probably be more
costly to us. In any case, we cannot assure you that an alternative provider of
satellite services would be available, or, if available, would be available on
terms favorable to us.
Competition
The market for Internet access services is extremely competitive.
Intelligent Communications believes that its ability to compete successfully
depends upon a number of factors, including: market presence; the capacity,
reliability, and security of its network infrastructure; the pricing policies of
its competitors and suppliers; and the timing and release of new products and
services by Intelligent Communications and its competitors. We cannot assure
that Intelligent Communications will be able to successfully compete with
respect to these factors.
Government regulation
The VSAT satellite industry is a highly regulated industry. In the
United States, operation and use of VSAT satellites requires licenses from the
FCC. As a lessee of satellite space, we could in the future be indirectly
subject to new laws, policies or regulations or changes in the interpretation or
application of existing laws, policies or regulations, that modify the present
regulatory environment in the United States.
While we believe that our lessors will be able to obtain all U.S.
licenses and authorizations necessary to operate effectively, we cannot assure
you that we our lessors will be successful in doing so. Our failure to
indirectly obtain some or all necessary licenses or approvals could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.
If we are unable to successfully integrate future acquisitions into our
operations, then our results and financial condition may be adversely affected
In addition to the recent acquisition of Intelligent Communications,
Inc., we may acquire other businesses that we believe will complement our
existing business. We cannot predict if or when any prospective acquisitions
will occur or the likelihood that they will be completed on favorable terms.
Acquiring a business involves many risks, including:
o potential disruption of our ongoing business and diversion of
resources and management time;
o incurrence of unforeseen obligations or liabilities;
o possible inability of management to maintain uniform
standards, controls, procedures and policies;
o difficulty assimilating the acquired operations and personnel;
o risks of entering markets in which we have little or no direct
prior experience; and
o potential impairment of relationships with employees or
customers as a result of changes in management.
We cannot assure that we will make any acquisitions or that we will be
able to obtain additional financing for such acquisitions, if necessary. If any
acquisitions are made, we cannot assure that we will be able to successfully
integrate the acquired business into our operations or that the acquired
business will perform as expected.
<PAGE>
Loss of key personnel may disrupt our operations
The loss of key personnel may disrupt our operations. Our success
depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified
technical, marketing, sales and management personnel. With the expansion of the
ISP Channel service, we are currently seeking new employees. However,
competition for such personnel is intense in our business, and thus, we may be
unsuccessful in our hiring efforts. To launch the ISP Channel service concept on
a large-scale basis, we have recently assembled a new management team, most of
whom have been with us for less than six months. The loss of any member of the
new team, or failure to attract or retain other key employees, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.
Direct and indirect government regulation can significantly impact our business
Currently, neither the FCC nor any other federal or state
communications regulatory agency directly regulates Internet access services
provided by our cable systems. However, any changes in law or regulation
relating to Internet connectivity, cable operators or telecommunications markets
could affect the nature, scope and prices of our services. Such changes include
those that directly or indirectly affect costs, limit usage of subscriber-
related information or increase the likelihood or scope of competition from
telecommunications companies or other Internet access providers.
Possibility of changes in law or regulation
Because the provision of Internet access services using cable networks
is a relatively recent development, the regulatory classification of such
services remains unsettled. Some parties have argued that providing Internet
access services over a cable network is a "telecommunications service" and that,
therefore, Internet access service providers should be subject to regulation
which, under the Communications Act of 1934, apply to telephone companies. Other
parties have argued that Internet access services over the cable system is a
cable service under the Communications Act, which would subject such services to
a different set of laws and regulations. It is unclear at this time whether
federal, state, or local governing bodies will adopt one classification over
another, or adopt another regulatory classification altogether, for Internet
access services provided over cable systems. The FCC recently decided to address
Internet access issuers in its February 17, 1999 order approving the merger
between AT&T and TCI, which was announced by the two companies on June 24, 1998.
A number of parties had opposed the merger unless the FCC required the AT&T/TCI
combination to provide unaffiliated ISPs with unbundled, open access to the
cable platform whenever that platform is being used by an AT&T/TCI affiliate to
provide Internet service. Other parties argued that the FCC should examine
industry-wide issues surrounding open access to cable-provided Internet service
in a generic rulemaking, rather than in the specific, adjudicatory context of a
merger evaluation. The FCC decided that it would be imprudent to grant either
request for action at this time given the nascent stage in the development and
deployment of high-speed Internet access services. Certain local jurisdictions
that approved the AT&T/TCI merger have imposed open access conditions on such
approval, while other such local jurisdictions have rejected such conditions or
have reserved the right to impose such conditions in the future. We cannot
predict the outcome or scope of the local approval process. Nor can we predict
the impact, if any, that future federal, state or local legal or regulatory
changes, including open access conditions, might have on our business.
Regulations affecting the cable industry may discourage cable operators
from upgrading their systems
Regulation of cable television may affect the speed at which our cable
affiliates upgrade their cable infrastructures to two-way cable. Currently, our
cable affiliates have generally elected to classify the distribution of our
services as "additional cable services" under their respective franchise
agreements, and accordingly pay franchise fees. However, the election by cable
operators to classify Internet access as an additional cable service may be
challenged before the FCC, the courts or Congress, and any change in the
classification of service could have a potentially adverse impact on our
company.
Our cable affiliates may be subject to multiple franchise fees for
distributing our services
Another possible risk is that local franchise authorities may subject
the cable affiliates to higher or additional franchise fees or taxes or
otherwise require them to obtain additional franchises in connection with
<PAGE>
distribution of our services. There are thousands of franchise authorities in
the United States alone, and thus it will be difficult or impossible for us or
our cable affiliates to operate under a unified set of franchise requirements.
Possible negative consequences if cable operators are classified as
common carriers
If the FCC or another governmental agency classifies cable system
operators as "common carriers" or "telecommunications carriers" because they
provide Internet services, or if cable system operators themselves seek such
classification as a means of limiting their liability, we could lose our rights
as the exclusive ISP for some of our cable affiliates and we or our cable
affiliates could be subject to common carrier regulation by federal and state
regulators.
Import restrictions may affect the delivery schedules and costs of
supplies from foreign shippers
In addition, we obtain some of the components for our products and
services from foreign suppliers which may be subject to tariffs, duties and
other import restrictions. Any changes in law or regulation including those
discussed above, whether in the United States or elsewhere, could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.
Failure to sell MTC in a timely manner could adversely affect our ability to
implement our business plan
We have announced the planned sale of MTC. We intend to apply the
proceeds of such a sale toward the repayment of debt and the expansion of the
ISP Channel service. However, we cannot assure you that these efforts will be
successful. In the absence of such a sale, management's attention could be
substantially diverted to operate or otherwise dispose of MTC. If a sale of MTC
is delayed, its value could be diminished. Moreover, MTC could incur losses and
operate on a negative cash flow basis in the future. Thus, any delay in finding
a buyer or failure to sell this division could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and prospects.
We do not intend to pay dividends
We have not historically paid any cash dividends on our common stock
and do not expect to declare any such dividends in the foreseeable future.
Payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital
requirements, our debt obligations and other factors the board of directors
deems relevant. We currently intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance
the development and expansion of the ISP Channel service. Our certificate of
incorporation (1) prohibits the payment of cash dividends on our common stock,
without the approval of the holders of the preferred stock and (2) upon
liquidation of our company, requires us to pay the holders of the convertible
preferred stock before we make any payments to the holders of our common stock.
You should also know that some of our financing agreements restrict our ability
to pay dividends on our common stock.
Our stock price is volatile
The volatility of our stock price may make it difficult for holders of
the common stock to transfer their shares at the prices they want. The market
price for our common stock has been volatile in the past, and several factors
could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors
include:
o announcements of developments related to our business;
o fluctuations in our results of operations;
o sales of substantial amounts of our securities into the
marketplace;
o general conditions in our industries or the worldwide economy;
o an outbreak of war or hostilities;
o a shortfall in revenues or earnings compared to securities
analysts' expectations;
<PAGE>
o changes in analysts' recommendations or projections;
o announcements of new products or services by us or our
competitors; and
o changes in our relationships with our suppliers or customers.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in the
future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to our performance. General
market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect
the price of our common stock, and thus, the current market price may not be
indicative of future market prices.
Prospective anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our stockholders
We are a Delaware corporation. The Delaware General Corporation Law
contains certain provisions that may discourage, delay or make a change in
control of our company more difficult or prevent the removal of incumbent
directors. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws have certain
provisions that have the same effect. These provisions may have a negative
impact on the price of our common stock and may discourage third-party bidders
from making a bid for our company or may reduce any premiums paid to
stockholders for their common stock.
The Year 2000 issue could harm our operations
Many computer programs have been written using two digits rather than
four to define the applicable year. This poses a problem at the end of the
century because such computer programs would not properly recognize a year that
begins with "20" instead of "19." This, in turn, could result in major system
failures or miscalculations that could disrupt our business. We have formulated
a Y2K Plan to address our Y2K issues and have created a Y2K Task Force headed by
the Director of Information Systems and Data Services to implement the plan. Our
Y2K Plan has six phases:
1. Organizational Awareness: educate our employees, senior
management, and the board of directors about the Y2K issue.
2. Inventory: complete inventory of internal business systems and
their relative priority to continuing business operations. In
addition, this phase includes a complete inventory of critical
vendors, suppliers and services providers and their Y2K
compliance status.
3. Assessment: assessment of internal business systems and
critical vendors, suppliers and service providers and their
Y2K compliance status.
4. Planning: preparing the individual project plans and project
teams and other required internal and external resources to
implement the required solutions for Y2K compliance.
5. Execution: implementation of the solutions and fixes.
6. Validation: testing the solutions for Y2K compliance.
Our Y2K Plan will apply to two areas:
1. Internal business systems
2. Compliance by external customers and providers
<PAGE>
Internal business systems
Our internal business systems and workstation business applications
will be a primary area of focus. We are in the unique position of completing the
implementation of new enterprise-wide business solutions to replace existing
manual processes and/or "home grown" applications during 1999. These solutions
are represented by their vendors as being fully Y2K compliant. We have few, if
any, "legacy" applications that will need to be evaluated for Y2K compliance.
We completed the Inventory, Assessment and Planning Phases of
substantially all critical internal business systems. The Execution and
Validation Phases will be completed by August 31, 1999. We expect to be Y2K
compliant on all critical systems, which rely on the calendar year, before
December 31, 1999.
Some non-critical systems may not be addressed until after January
2000. However, we believe such systems will not cause significant disruptions in
our operations.
Compliance by external customers and providers
We are in the process of the inventory and assessment phases of our
critical suppliers, service providers and contractors to determine the extent to
which the our interface systems are susceptible to those third parties' failure
to remedy their own Y2K issues. We expect that assessment will be complete by
mid-1999. To the extent that responses to Y2K readiness are unsatisfactory, we
intend to change suppliers, service providers or contractors to those that have
demonstrated Y2K readiness. We cannot be assured that we will be successful in
finding such alternative suppliers, service providers and contractors. We do not
currently have any formal information concerning the status of our customers but
have received indications that most of our customers are working on Y2K
compliance.
Risks associated with Y2K
We believe the major risk associated with the Y2K issue is the ability
of our key business partners and vendors to resolve their own Y2K issues. We
will spend a great deal of time over the next several months, working closely
with suppliers and vendors, to assure their compliance.
Should a situation occur where a key partner or vendor is unable to
resolve their Y2K issue, we expect to be in a position to change to Y2K
compliant partners and vendors.
Costs to address Y2K issues
Because we are in the unique position of implementing new
enterprise-wide business solutions to replace existing manual processes and/or
"home grown" applications, there will be little, if any, Y2K changes required to
existing business applications. All of the new business applications implemented
(or in the process of being implemented in 1999) are represented as being Y2K
compliant.
We currently believe that implementing our Y2K Plan will not have a
material effect on our financial position.
Contingency Plan
We have not formulated a contingency plan at this time but expect to
have specific contingency plans in place prior to September 30, 1999.
Summary
We anticipate that the Y2K issue will not have a material adverse
effect on the financial position or results of our operations. There can be no
assurance, however, that the systems of other companies or government entities,
<PAGE>
on which we rely for supplies, cash payments, and future business, will be
timely converted, or that a failure to convert by another company or government
entities, would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or
results of operations. If third-party suppliers, service providers and
contractors, due to Y2K issues, fail to provide us with components, materials,
or services which are necessary to deliver our service and product offerings,
with sufficient electrical power and transportation infrastructure to deliver
our service and product offerings, then any such failure could have a material
adverse effect our ability to conduct business, as well as our financial
position and results of operations.
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties
This prospectus contains "forward-looking" statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including the risks faced by us described above and elsewhere in this
prospectus.
<PAGE>
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). You
may read and copy any document we file at the public reference facilities of the
SEC located at 450 Fifth Street N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the SEC's public reference facilities by calling
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also access copies of such material
electronically on the SEC's home page on the World Wide Web at
http://www.sec.gov.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement (Registration No.
333-45335) we filed with the SEC. The SEC permits us to "incorporate by
reference" the information we file with them, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to those documents. The
information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this
prospectus, and information that we file with the SEC after the date of this
prospectus will automatically update and supersede this information. We
incorporate by reference the following documents filed by us with the SEC (File
No. 1-5270). We also incorporate by reference any future filings made with the
SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, until the selling stockholders sell all of the shares of
common stock being registered or until such shares can be sold without being
registered.
1. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1998, as amended, filed with the SEC on February
2, 1999, and as further amended, filed with the SEC on March
4, 1999.
2. Our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the
SEC on March 17, 1999.
3. Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended December 31, 1998.
4. Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January
26, 1999.
5. Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February
24, 1999.
6. Our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on
February 26, 1999.
7. Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February
26, 1999.
8. Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5,
1999.
9. Our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on March
12, 1999.
If you request a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by
reference, then we will send to you the copies you requested at no charge.
However, we will not send exhibits to such documents, unless such exhibits are
specifically incorporated by reference in such documents. You should direct
requests for such copies to Mr. Steven M. Harris, Secretary, SoftNet Systems,
Inc., 650 Townsend Street, Suite 225, San Francisco, California 94103, (415)
365-2500.
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus
and incorporated by reference into this prospectus. We have not authorized
anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this
prospectus. The selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to
buy, shares of SoftNet common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales
are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as
of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this
prospectus or of any sale of the shares.
<PAGE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of our
common stock being offered by the selling stockholders under this prospectus.
THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
Selling Stockholders, including (i) the name of each Selling Stockholder, (ii)
the number of Shares beneficially owned by each Selling Stockholder as of
December 31, 1997, and (iii) the maximum number of Shares which may be offered
hereby. The information presented is based on data furnished to the Company by
the Selling Stockholders. Percentage ownership is based upon 6,970,546 shares of
Common Stock outstanding on December 31, 1997.
The number of shares that may be actually sold by each Selling
Stockholder will be determined by such Selling Stockholder. Because each Selling
Stockholder may sell all, some or none of the shares of Common Stock which each
holds, and because the offering contemplated by this Prospectus is not currently
being underwritten, no estimate can be given as to the number of shares of
Common Stock that will be held by the Selling Stockholders upon termination of
the offering.
Pursuant to Rule 416 of the Securities Act, Selling Stockholders may
also offer and sell additional shares of Common Stock issued with respect to
warrants and the Convertible Preferred Stock as a result of stock splits, stock
dividends and anti-dilution provisions (including by reason of the floating rate
conversion price mechanism of the Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with
the terms thereof).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Beneficially Owned Prior Shares Being
to Offering Offered
------------------------------ ------------
Number Percent
------------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
RGC International Investors, LDC 1,543,412(1) 18.1% 1,543,412(1)
John Jellinek 378,102(2 5.4% 251,500(3)
Joseph Rich 370,484(4) 5.3% 113,500(5)
Compania Di Investimento Italian 200,000(5) 2.8% 200,000(5)
Forsythe/McArthur 109,000(5) 1.6% 109,000(5)
Robert G. Lamphere 143,507(6) 2.1% 45,500(5)
Charles R. Lamphere 121,004(6) 1.7% 45,500(5)
Alpine Capital Partners, Inc. 50,000(7) * 50,000
Miami University Foundation 50,000 * 50,000
John G. Hamm 44,430(8) * 15,000
Christopher Moore 2,225(5) * 2,225
Donald Asher 37,200(9) * 26,000(5)
Alfred Ziegler 30,522(6) * 30,508(5)
E. Forbes Gordon 30,000(6) * 20,000(5)
Willard Aaron 21,800(5) * 21,800(5)
BWJ Partnership 21,800(5) * 21,800
Jeannette Von Witzenburg 20,000(10) * 20,000
CGRM Partnership 13,080(5) * 13,080
Michael I. Cleary 5,995(5) * 5,995
David Prokupek 5,995(5) * 5,995
Timothy P. Reiland 5,450(5) * 5,450
Christopher Barnes 2,180(5) * 2,180
Harlan P. Kleiman 12,800(5) * 12,800
Michael Sweeney 8,400(5) * 8,400
Robert Rubin 7,000(5) * 7,000
David Slater 7,000(5) * 7,000
<PAGE>
Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. 1,000(5) * 1,000
Russell Jeppesen 1,000(5) * 1,000
Phillip Kenny 178,102(11) * 51,500(5)
Irene F. Jellinek 2,500(12) * 2,500
David Garbus 1,000 * 1,000
Sean Kenlon 3,500(5) * 3,500
James L. Kropf 3,000(5) * 3,000
Steven Lamar 2,400(5) * 2,400
D&K Stores 43,600(5) * 43,600
Brian Feuer 2,000(5) * 2,000
Mark Rabkin 1,875(5) * 1,875
Joshua Breen 1,000(5) * 1,000
Thomas Griesel 800(5) * 800
<FN>
- ------------------------------
* Less than 1%.
(1) Includes 150,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
RGC Warrants and 1,393,412 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock. The actual number of shares
of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Preferred
Stock is indeterminate, and is subject to adjustment and could be
materially less or more than the 1,393,412 set forth above depending on
factors which cannot be predicted by the Company at this time,
including, among other factors, the future market price of the Common
Stock. The 1,393,412 shares of Common Stock included in the Selling
Stockholders table represents a good faith estimate of the number of
shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon conversion of the
Convertible Preferred Stock (including shares issuable as a result of
payment of premiums in Common Stock or as a result of conversion
default or other default payments). Pursuant to Rule 416 under the
Securities Act, the actual number of shares offered hereby, and
included in the Registration Statement of which this prospectus forms a
part, includes, such additional number of shares of Common Stock as may
be issued or issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Preferred
Stock by reason of the floating rate conversion price mechanism or
other adjustment mechanisms described therein, or by reason of any
stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction involving the Common
Stock, in order to prevent dilution. Pursuant to the terms of the
Certificate of Designation for the Convertible Preferred Stock, the
actual number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the
Convertible Preferred Stock will equal (i) the aggregate stated value
of the shares of Convertible Preferred Stock then being converted
(i.e., $1,000 per share), plus a premium in the amount of 5% per annum
accruing cumulatively from December 31, 1997, through the date of
conversion (unless the Company chooses to pay such premium in cash or
additional shares of Convertible Preferred Stock), divided by (ii) a
conversion price equal to the lower of $8.28 per share and the lowest
two-day average closing price of the Common Stock (as determined in
accordance with the Certificate of Amendment designating the
Convertible Preferred Stock) during a specified 20-day trading period
immediately prior to such conversion (subject to adjustment in
accordance with the Certificate of Amendment designating the
Convertible Preferred Stock). Except under certain limited
circumstances, the Convertible Preferred Stock is not convertible to
the extent that the shares to be received upon such conversion or
exercise would equal or exceed 20% of the outstanding Common Stock.
Therefore, the number of shares set forth herein and which a
stockholder may sell pursuant to this Prospectus may exceed the number
of shares of Common Stock such stockholder would otherwise beneficially
own as determined pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act.
Pursuant to the terms of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the shares of
Convertible Preferred Stock are convertible by any holder only to the
extent that the number of shares of Common Stock thereby issuable,
together with the number of shares of Common Stock owned by such holder
and its affiliates (but not including shares of Common Stock underlying
unconverted shares of Convertible Preferred Stock) would not exceed
4.99% of the then outstanding Common Stock as determined in accordance
with Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act unless such stockholder notifies
the Company of its intent to convert an amount of Convertible Preferred
Stock that causes such stockholder to own more than 4.99% of the Common
Stock at least sixty-one days prior to the date of such conversion.
Accordingly, the number of shares of Common Stock set forth in the
table for this Selling Stockholder exceeds the number of shares of
Common Stock that this Selling Stockholder beneficially owns as of
December 31, 1997. In that regard, beneficial ownership of this Selling
Stockholder set forth in the table is not determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.
<PAGE>
(2) Includes (i) 200,000 shares of Common Stock held by Jelco Ventures,
Inc., (ii) 126,602 shares of Common Stock held by Jelken LLC, and (iii)
51,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock purchase
warrants held by Jelken LLC. Mr. Jellinek shares voting power with
Phillip Kenny for all shares held by Jelken LLC.
(3) Includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock held by Jelco Ventures, Inc.
and 51,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock
purchase warrants held by Jelken LLC.
(4) Includes 113,500 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants.
(5) Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants.
(6) Includes shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants.
(7) Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of warrants held by Alpine
Capital Partners, Inc. for which Evan Bines has full voting and
dispositive power.
(8) Includes 29,430 shares of Common Stock held jointly with his wife.
(9) Includes (i) 26,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase
warrants that are held by DF Investments, for which Mr. Asher has full
voting and dispositive power, (ii) 5,600 shares held by Mr. Asher's
wife, and (iii) 5,600 shares held by Mr.
Asher.
(10) Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants
held in trust under which Ms. Van Witzenburg, as trustee, has full
dispositive and voting power.
(11) Consists of the shares described in note (2)(ii) and (iii) above.
(12) Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrant
held in trusts under which Ms. Jellinek, as trustee, has full
dispositive and voting power.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Relationships with the Company
On December 31, 1997, Registrant issued to RGC International Investors,
LDC ("RGC"), 5,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to
purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock ("RGC Warrants") pursuant to a
Securities Purchase Agreement. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at
a price based upon the market price for the Common Stock during the trading
period preceding conversion but not more than $8.28 per share. The RGC Warrants
are exercisable at $7.95 per share. Any Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding
on December 31, 2000 will be automatically converted into Common Stock and the
RGC Warrants expire on December 31, 2001. The RGC Warrants require adjustments
of the exercise price and the number of shares of Common Stock issuable if the
Company issues additional shares of Common Stock (other than pursuant to
presently outstanding warrants and other convertible securities, as well as
under Board approved employee/director option plans) at prices less than the
then market price. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory
redemption, at 118% of stated value per share ($1,000), and the Company is
subject to penalties, under a variety of circumstances, including failure to
list the underlying Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange and failure to
register the resale of the underlying Common Stock under the Securities Act. At
the Company's option, the Convertible Preferred Stock may be redeemed after
December 31, 1998 at the greater of Parity Value (as defined therein) or 130% of
its stated value. The Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to dividends, at
the rate of 5% per annum, payable in cash or, at the Company's election, in
additional shares of Convertible Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement, the Company has filed with the Commission a Registration
<PAGE>
Statement on Form S-3, of which this Prospectus forms a part, with respect to
the resale of the shares issued to RGC and Shoreline and agreed to use its best
efforts to keep such Registration Statement effective until such date as all of
the shares have been resold, or such time as all of the shares held by RGC can
be sold immediately without compliance with the registration requirement of the
Securities Act, pursuant to Rule 144 or otherwise. The sale of the Preferred
Stock and the RGC Warrants was arranged by Shoreline Pacific Institutional
Finance, the Institutional Division of Financial West Group ("Shoreline"), who
received a fee of $250,000 plus warrants, exercisable at $6.625 and expiring on
December 31, 2000, to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock. The warrants
issued to Shoreline have been allocated among Messrs. Kleiman, Kropf, Lamar and
Griesel.
Mr. Hamm has been a director of the Company since 1985. At September
30, 1994, the Company was owed approximately $4.1 million plus accrued interest
by Ozite Corporation ("Ozite"). John G. Hamm held a substantial interest in
Ozite. Mr. Hamm was a director of Ozite from 1984 to 1994, Vice
President-Finance of Ozite from 1990 to 1994 and a director of Plastic
Specialties & Technologies, Inc. ("PST"), a majority-owned subsidiary of Ozite,
from 1993 to January 1996. Due to uncertainties about collecting these funds,
the receivable from Ozite was written off and charged against earnings in 1991.
On July 26, 1995, Ozite shareholders approved a merger of Ozite with Pure Tech
International, Inc. ("Pure Tech") with Pure Tech being the surviving
corporation. As a condition of the merger, Ozite was required to secure a
general release from the Company and to surrender certain securities in
satisfaction of the amount owed to the Company. As a result, the Company
received 311,025 shares of Pure Tech common stock, 267,203 shares of ARTRA Group
Incorporated ("ARTRA") Common Stock, and approximately 932 shares of ARTRA
Preferred Stock. Subsequently, the Company sold all 311,025 shares of Pure Tech
for net proceeds of $1,027,466. During fiscal 1996, the remaining securities
consisting of ARTRA Common Stock and ARTRA Preferred Stock were sold for net
proceeds of $815,000, which were recorded as a capital contribution.
In 1994, the Board voted to compensate Mr. Hamm $150,000 for previously
uncompensated services as a consultant rendered to the Company over the prior
ten years. During that period, Mr. Hamm coordinated the preparation of public
filings made by the Company, reviewed acquisition proposals and was involved in
investor relations. The Board authorized Mr. Hamm to receive (i) $100,000 in
cash, and (ii) either $50,000 in shares of Common Stock (10,000 shares) or 10
year warrants to purchase 16,667 shares of Common Stock at $5.00 per share, as
Mr. Hamm elects. In May 1996, the Company paid Mr. Hamm $77,000 and signed a
promissory note for $88,000 payable in equal monthly installments of $15,000
beginning June 1, 1996. The cash payment and the promissory note fulfilled the
Company's entire obligation to Mr. Hamm. At the Company's request, payments to
Mr. Hamm were suspended on September 1, 1996 due to cash flow constraints. At
September 30, 1996, the unpaid compensation was $44,500. Payments to Mr. Hamm
resumed in fiscal 1997, and the Company's entire obligation to Mr. Hamm, with
respect to his unpaid compensation, was satisfied as of January 1998. In
connection with these payments, Mr. Hamm exercised his stock purchase warrants
to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock.
Mr. Jellinek was the Chief Executive Officer of the Company from June
1993 to September 1996 and a director of the Company from June 1993 to December
1996. Mr. Kenny was a director of the Company from June 1993 to December 1996.
In December 1997, Communicate Direct, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company ("CDI"), sold its operations that support its Fujitsu maintenance base
in the Chicago metropolitan area to a new company formed by Messrs. Jellinek and
Kenny. The buyer acquired certain assets in exchange for a $209,000 promissory
note and the assumption of trade payables of at least $624,000. In addition, at
the closing the buyer paid off $438,000 of existing Company bank debt and
entered into a sub-lease of CDI's facility in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. At the
closing, the buyer merged with Telecom Midwest, LLC. and Messrs. Jellinek and
Kenny and two other shareholders of the merged company personally guaranteed
trade payables. The personal guarantees of the promissory note are several. The
personal guarantees of the sub-lease are limited to $400,000 and are on a joint
and several basis. The personal guarantees of trade payables are on a joint and
several basis but are limited to Messrs. Jellinek and Kenny. Concurrent with
this transaction, Messrs. Jellinek and Kenny resigned from the Company's board.
The transaction was approved by the disinterested members of the Company's
board. In June 1996, the Company acquired the exclusive worldwide manufacturing
rights to IMNET Systems, Inc.'s ("IMNET") MegaSAR Microfilm Jukebox and
completed and amended its obligations under a previous agreement. In addition to
becoming the exclusive manufacturer of the MegaSAR for IMNET, the Company issued
a $2.9 million note for prepaid license fees, software inventory, the
manufacturing rights, and certain other payables. Approximately $2.5 million was
paid on this note during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996. The Company has a
receivable from IMNET of $176,000. The transaction was approved by the
disinterested members of the Company's board. Following the transaction, Messrs.
Jellinek and McDonough, a former director of the Company, resigned from IMNET's
board, and James Gordon, director of IMNET, resigned from the Company's Board.
<PAGE>
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company decided to
integrate the IMNET microfilm retrieval software with another software
developer's product, which the Company was already distributing. The integrated
product will require less IMNET software than previously assumed. As a result,
the Company recorded a one-time charge of $1.5 million to write-off software
inventory. Since the acquisition of the manufacturing rights from IMNET, the
transfer of all of the technical and manufacturing know-how has been delayed due
to technical difficulties. In July 1997, the Company and IMNET further amended
the June 1996 Agreement. In an attempt to facilitate the technology transfer,
the Company accepted an order from IMNET for the first 14 MegaSAR units to be
manufactured by the Company. A portion of the payment for these initial units
would be applied against the outstanding promissory note. The transfer of the
technology and the parts needed for production was to have occurred no later
than September 1, 1997. As of September 30, 1997, the transfer to the Company of
the technical and manufacturing know-how for this product offering has continued
to be delayed. Despite the ongoing negotiation and cooperation between the two
parties, the Company determined there was a potential material risk in
completing the technology transfer and getting the product to market. As a
result, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, the Company recorded a one-time
charge to write-off the remaining $1.0 million in assets associated with this
transaction. The Company is currently negotiating with IMNET to either complete
the transfer or seek an alternative solution. During fiscal 1996, the Company
sold its entire holdings in IMNET for net proceeds of $7.7 million. Accordingly,
the Company recorded a gain on the sale of the securities of $5.7 million. Mr.
Ziegler was the Vice President and Secretary of the Company from 1978 to
February 1996 and a director of the Company from 1977 to 1996.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the Shares
offered hereby. The Selling Stockholders have advised the Company that the
Shares may be sold by the Selling Stockholders or their respective pledgees,
donees, transferees or successors in interest, in one or more transactions
(which may involve one or more block transactions) on the Nasdaq National
Market, in sales occurring in the public market of such Exchange, in privately
negotiated transactions, through the writing of options on shares, short sales
or in a combination of such transactions; that each sale may be made either at
market prices prevailing at the time of such sale or at negotiated prices; that
some or all of the Shares may be sold through brokers acting on behalf of the
Selling Stockholders or to dealers for resale by such dealers; and that in
connection with such sales such brokers and dealers may receive compensation in
the form of discounts and commissions from the Selling Stockholders and may
receive commissions from the purchasers of Shares for whom they act as broker or
agent (which discounts and commissions are not anticipated to exceed those
customary in the types of transactions involved). Any broker or dealer
participating in any such sale may be deemed to be an "underwriter" within the
meaning of the Securities Act and will be required to deliver a copy of this
Prospectus to any person who purchases any of the Shares from or through such
broker or dealer. The Company has been advised that, as of the date hereof, none
of the Selling Stockholders have made any arrangements with any broker for the
sale of their Shares.
In offering the Shares covered hereby, the Selling Stockholders and any
broker-dealers and any other participating broker-dealers who execute sales for
the Selling Stockholders may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning
of the Securities Act in connection with such sales, and any profits realized by
the Selling Stockholders and the compensation of such broker-dealer may be
deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions. In addition, any Shares
covered by this Prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 may be
sold under Rule 144 rather than pursuant to this Prospectus.
In order to comply with certain states' securities laws, if applicable,
the Shares will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or
licensed brokers or dealers. In certain states, the Shares may not be sold
unless the Shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an
exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.
Under applicable rules and regulations under Regulation M, any person engaged in
the distribution of the shares may not simultaneously engage in market making
activities, subject to certain exceptions, with respect to the Common Stock of
the Company for a period of five business days prior to the commencement of such
distribution and until its completion. In addition and without limiting the
foregoing, each Selling Stockholder will be subject to the applicable provisions
of the Securities Act and Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder,
including, without limitation, Regulation M, which provisions may limit the
timing of purchases and sales of shares of the Company's Common Stock by the
Selling Stockholders.
<PAGE>
The Company will bear all expenses of the offering of the Shares,
except that the Selling Stockholders will pay any applicable underwriting
commissions and expenses, brokerage fees and transfer taxes, as well as the fees
and disbursements of counsel to and experts for the Selling Stockholders.
Pursuant to the terms of registration rights agreements with certain of
the Selling Stockholders, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless
such Selling Stockholders from certain liabilities under the Securities Act.
LEGAL
The validity of the securities of offered hereby will be passed upon
for the company by Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP, Palo Alto, California.
EXPERTS
The financial statements incorporated in this Prospectus by reference
to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1998 have
been so incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
The financial statements incorporated in this Prospectus by reference
to the Current Reports on Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on February 26 and
March 12, 1999, have been so incorporated in reliance on the reports of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Blanding, Boyer & Rockwell L.L.P, independent
accountants, given on the authority of said firms as experts in auditing and
accounting.
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The following are the expenses (estimated except for the SEC
registration fee) for the issuance and distribution of the securities being
registered, all of which will be paid by the Registrant.
SEC registration fee $ 5,123
Fees and expenses of counsel 20,000
Fees and expenses of accountants. 10,000
Listing fees 17,500
Transfer agent fees 5,000
Miscellaneous 17,500
------
Total $75,133
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
The Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation limits the liability of
directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides
that a director of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary
damages for breach of such individual's fiduciary duties as a director except
for liability for (i) any breach of such director's duty of loyalty to the
corporation, (ii) any acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) any unlawful
payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided
in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) any transaction
from which a director derives an improper personal benefit.
The Registrant's Bylaws provide that the Registrant will indemnify its
directors and may indemnify its officers, employees and other agents to the full
extent permitted by law. The Registrant believes that indemnification under its
Bylaws covers at least negligence and gross negligence on the part of an
indemnified party and permits the Registrant to advance expenses incurred by an
indemnified party in connection with the defense of any action or proceeding
arising out of such party's status or service as a director, officer, employee
or other agent of the Registrant upon an undertaking by such party to repay such
advances if it is ultimately determined that such party is not entitled to
indemnification.
The Registrant has entered into separate indemnification agreements
with each of its directors and officers. These agreements require the
Registrant, among other things, to indemnify such director or officer against
expenses (including attorney fees), judgments, fines and settlements
(collectively, "Liabilities") paid by such individual in connection with any
action, suit or proceeding arising out of such individual's status or service as
a director or officer of the Registrant (other than Liabilities arising from
willful misconduct or conduct that is knowingly fraudulent or deliberately
dishonest) and to advance expenses incurred by such individual in connection
with any proceeding against such individual with respect to which such
individual may be entitled to indemnification by the Registrant. The Registrant
believes that its Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw provisions and
indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons
as directors and officers.
The Registrant maintains directors and officers liability insurance
covering all directors and officers of the Registrant against claims arising out
of the performance of their duties.
<PAGE>
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
Exhibit Number Description of Exhibit
3.1* Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3.2* Bylaws
4.1 Articles Fifth and Sixth of Registrant's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (See exhibit 3.1)
5++ Opinion of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison L.L.P.
23.1++ Consent of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison L.L.P. (included
as part of Exhibit 5)
23.2+ Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
23.3++ Consent of Blanding, Boyer & Rockwell LLP
24.1++ Powers of Attorney (included on signature page of the
Registration Statement).
99.1** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to RGC
International Investors, LDC dated August 31, 1998
(Series C)
99.2** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Shoreline Pacific Equity, Ltd. dated August 31, 1998
(Series C)
99.3** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Steven M. Lamar dated August 31, 1998 (Series C)
99.4** Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Buyers (as defined therein), dated as of August 31,
1998 (Series C and Series D)
99.5** Registration Rights Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Initial Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
August 31, 1998 (Series C and Series D)
99.6** Escrow Agreement by and among SoftNet, the Buyers (as
defined therein), Shoreline Pacific Institutional
Finance and the Escrow Holder (as defined therein),
dated as of August 31, 1998 (Series C)
99.7** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Shoreline Pacific Equity, Ltd. dated August 31, 1998
(Series D)
99.8** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Steven M. Lamar dated August 31, 1998 (Series D)
99.9*** Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Buyers (as defined therein), dated as of May 28,
1998 (Series B)
99.10*** Registration Rights Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Initial Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
May 28, 1998 (Series B)
99.11*** Escrow Agreement by and among SoftNet, the Buyers (as
defined therein), Shoreline Pacific Institutional
Finance and the Escrow Holder (as defined therein),
dated as of May 28, 1998 (Series B)
99.12*** Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued
to purchasers of the Series B Preferred Stock dated May
28, 1998 (Series B)
99.13*** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Steven M. Lamar dated August 31, 1998 (Series B)
<PAGE>
99.14** List of recipients of Common Stock Purchase Warrants
issued in connection with the Series B Preferred Stock
transaction
99.15**** Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Buyers (as defined therein), dated as of December
31, 1997 (Series A)
99.16**** Registration Rights Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Initial Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
December 31, 1997 (Series A)
99.17**** Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued
to purchasers of the Series A Preferred Stock dated
December 31, 1997 (Series A)
99.18**** Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued
to assignees of Shoreline Pacific Institutional Finance
dated December 31, 1997 (Series A)
99.19** List of recipients of Common Stock Purchase Warrants
issued in connection with the Series A Preferred Stock
transaction
99.20** Action by Written Consent of the Sole Holder of the
Series E Preferred Stock
---------------
+ Filed herewith
++ Filed previously
* Filed as an exhibit to the SoftNet's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-74767)
** Filed as an exhibit to the SoftNet's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-65593)
*** Filed as an exhibit to the SoftNet's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-57337)
**** Filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 26, 1998
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.
1. (a) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to file, during any
period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to
this Registration Statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of
the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act");
(ii) To reflect, in the prospectus any facts or events arising
after the date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in any information in the
Registration Statement;
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the
plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration
Statement or any material change to such information in the
Registration Statement;
provided, however, that the undertakings set forth in paragraph (i) and
(ii) above do not apply if the information required to be included in a
post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports
filed by the Registrant pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act that are incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement.
<PAGE>
(b) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for determining
any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(c) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to file a
post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that
remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(d) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act, each filing of the
Registrant's annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act that- is incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed
to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
2. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons
of the undersigned Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, the undersigned Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In
the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than
the payment by the undersigned Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer or controlling person of the undersigned Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the undersigned Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its
counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court
of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all
of the requirements for filing on Form S-3, and has duly caused this
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized in San Francisco, California on May 20, 1999.
SOFTNET SYSTEMS, INC.
By: /s/ Douglas S. Sinclair
Douglas S. Sinclair
Chief Financial Officer
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below does hereby constitute and appoint, jointly and severally, Dr.
Lawrence B. Brilliant and Douglas S. Sinclair, or either of them, as his or her
true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Registration Statement filed herewith and
any and all amendments to said Registration Statement (including post-effective
amendments and registration statements filed pursuant to Rule 462 and
otherwise), and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney as of the date indicated.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities indicated.
Signature Title Date
/s/ Ronald I. Simon*
- ------------------------------
Ronald I. Simon Chairman of the Board March 22, 1999
/s/ Dr. Lawrence B. Brilliant*
- ------------------------------
Dr. Lawrence B. Brilliant Vice Chairman of the Board, March 22, 1999
President and
Chief ExecutiveOfficer
/s/ Douglas S. Sinclair*
- ------------------------------
Douglas S. Sinclair Chief Financial Officer March 22, 1999
/s/ Mark A. Phillips*
- ------------------------------
Mark A. Phillips Chief Accounting Officer March 22, 1999
/s/ Ian B. Aaron*
- ------------------------------
Ian B. Aaron Director March 22, 1999
/s/ Edward A. Bennett*
- ------------------------------
Edward A. Bennett Director March 22, 1999
/s/ Sean P. Doherty*
- ------------------------------
Sean P. Doherty Director March 22, 1999
/s/ Robert C. Harris, Jr*
- ------------------------------
Robert C. Harris, Jr. Director March 22, 1999
*by /s/ Douglas S. Sinclair May 20, 1999
- ------------------------------
Douglas S. Sinclair, Attorney-in-Fact
<PAGE>
Exhibit Number Description of Exhibit
3.1* Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3.2* Bylaws
4.1 Articles Fifth and Sixth of Registrant's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (See exhibit 3.1)
5++ Opinion of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison L.L.P.
23.1++ Consent of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison L.L.P. (included
as part of Exhibit 5)
23.2+ Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
23.3++ Consent of Blanding, Boyer & Rockwell LLP
24.1++ Powers of Attorney (included on signature page of the
Registration Statement).
99.1** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to RGC
International Investors, LDC dated August 31, 1998
(Series C)
99.2** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Shoreline Pacific Equity, Ltd. dated August 31, 1998
(Series C)
99.3** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Steven M. Lamar dated August 31, 1998 (Series C)
99.4** Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Buyers (as defined therein), dated as of August 31,
1998 (Series C and Series D)
99.5** Registration Rights Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Initial Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
August 31, 1998 (Series C and Series D)
99.6** Escrow Agreement by and among SoftNet, the Buyers (as
defined therein), Shoreline Pacific Institutional
Finance and the Escrow Holder (as defined therein),
dated as of August 31, 1998 (Series C)
99.7** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Shoreline Pacific Equity, Ltd. dated August 31, 1998
(Series D)
99.8** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Steven M. Lamar dated August 31, 1998 (Series D)
99.9*** Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Buyers (as defined therein), dated as of May 28,
1998 (Series B)
99.10*** Registration Rights Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Initial Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
May 28, 1998 (Series B)
99.11*** Escrow Agreement by and among SoftNet, the Buyers (as
defined therein), Shoreline Pacific Institutional
Finance and the Escrow Holder (as defined therein),
dated as of May 28, 1998 (Series B)
99.12*** Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued
to purchasers of the Series B Preferred Stock dated May
28, 1998 (Series B)
99.13*** Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued to
Steven M. Lamar dated August 31, 1998 (Series B)
<PAGE>
99.14** List of recipients of Common Stock Purchase Warrants
issued in connection with the Series B Preferred Stock
transaction
99.15**** Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Buyers (as defined therein), dated as of December
31, 1997 (Series A)
99.16**** Registration Rights Agreement by and among SoftNet and
the Initial Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
December 31, 1997 (Series A)
99.17**** Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued
to purchasers of the Series A Preferred Stock dated
December 31, 1997 (Series A)
99.18**** Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Certificate issued
to assignees of Shoreline Pacific Institutional Finance
dated December 31, 1997 (Series A)
99.19** List of recipients of Common Stock Purchase Warrants
issued in connection with the Series A Preferred Stock
transaction
99.20** Action by Written Consent of the Sole Holder of the
Series E Preferred Stock
---------------
+ Filed herewith
++ Filed previously
* Filed as an exhibit to the SoftNet's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-74767)
** Filed as an exhibit to the SoftNet's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-65593)
*** Filed as an exhibit to the SoftNet's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-57337)
**** Filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 26, 1998
Exhibit 23.2
Consent of Independent Accountants
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement of SoftNet Systems, Inc. on
Form S-3 (No. 333-45335) of our report dated December 1, 1998, except for Note
18 which is dated January 13, 1999, which appears on the 1998 Annual Report to
Shareholders of SoftNet Systems, Inc., which is incorporated by reference in
SoftNet's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1998. We
hereby further consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report on
Intelligent Communications, Inc. Financial Statements dated February 9, 1999,
which is incorporated by reference in SoftNet's Reports on Form 8-K/A filed with
the SEC on February 26, 1999 and March 12, 1999. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such prospectus and Form 8-K/A.
/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
May 21, 1999
San Jose, California
