2
OLT-21-001320
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
[1]
This Decision and Order of the Tribunal determines the Appeal brought by the
Appellant, appealing the decision of the Committee of Adjustment (“Committee”) on July
22, 2021, which authorized minor variances requested by the Applicant.
[2]
The Applicant proposed an industrial development of the property located at
1047-1049 Barton Street in Stoney Creek (“Site”), intending to develop a six-unit, 41-
loading bay warehouse, with related office space and parking areas. Conditional Site
Plan Approval had been obtained from the City on December 11, 2019, but due to the
Applicant’s view that there had been changes in market demand for the proposed units,
a prohibition on truck traffic on Barton Street to the south, and certain factors affecting
ingress and egress, the site plan and concept plan were subsequently altered. With the
changes, loading bays were located on the west side of the building, and office space
and parking were located on the east side. These changes necessitated the request for
minor variances.
[3]
The decision of the Committee was filed at Tab 9 of Exhibit 2. A total of eleven
variances were applied for. The Public Notice listed 12 Variances following the review
of Planning Staff. The variances identified by the Committee, and authorized, were
subject to one condition relating to a Noise Study. The Committee decision also
included five “Notes”, which made reference to a contingent requirement for the
issuance of a building permit. There was also a reference by the Committee to three
barrier free parking spaces being permitted “instead of the minimum required ten (10)
barrier free parking spaces, which was identified in the Public Notice, but ultimately not
required with the variation in the standard parking space regulation and the fact that the
number of barrier free parking spaces is the ratio of that required parking, as varied.
The decision of the Committee further made reference to additional requirements, one
of which appeared to be worded as a condition and two of which suggested that
additional variances might be required. The background to the variances requested,
referred to in the Public Notice and dealt with by the Committee, and the Variances now
before the Tribunal, are addressed below.