Ontario Land Tribunal  
Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement  
du territoire  
ISSUE DATE: July 11, 2022  
CASE NO(S).:  
OLT-22-002109  
Formerly PL030514)  
OLT-22-003806  
Formerly PL030412)  
OLT-22-002672  
(
(
(
Formerly PL101091)  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Appellant:  
Subject:  
See Schedule “1”  
New Official Plan for the City of Toronto, as  
adopted by By-law No. 1082-2002  
City of Toronto  
Municipality:  
OLT Case No.:  
OLT-22-003806  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
PL030412 (various files see Schedule “1”)  
OLT-22-003806  
PL030412  
OLT Case Name:  
3C Lakeshore Inc. v. Toronto (City)  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Appellant:  
See Schedule “2”  
Subject:  
Municipality:  
Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 257  
City of Toronto  
OLT Case No.:  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
OLT-22-002109  
PL030514-O030096  
OLT-22-002109  
PL030514  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
2
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Appellant:  
See Schedule “3”  
Subject:  
Municipality:  
By-law No. 1049-2006  
City of Toronto  
OLT Case No.:  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
OLT-22-002112  
PL030514-R060297  
OLT-22-002109  
PL030514  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Applicant and Appellant:  
Subject:  
3C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home Depot)  
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of  
City of Toronto to adopt the requested  
amendment  
Existing Designation:  
Proposed Designation:  
Purpose:  
Central and East Bayfront  
Site Specific (To be determined)  
To permit Commercial and Residential uses  
429 Lakeshore Boulevard and 324 Cherry  
Street  
Property Address/Description:  
Municipality:  
City of Toronto  
Approval Authority File No.:  
OLT Case No.:  
05 171818 STE 28 OZ  
OLT-22-002113  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
PL060106-O060034  
OLT-22-002109  
PL030514  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Applicant and Appellant:  
Subject:  
3C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home Depot)  
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 438-  
8
6 Neglect of application by City of Toronto  
Existing Zoning:  
Proposed Zoning:  
Purpose:  
Mixed Industrial-commercial category  
Site Specific (To be determined)  
To permit Commercial and Residential uses  
429 Lakeshore Boulevard and 324 Cherry  
Street  
Property Address/Description:  
Municipality:  
City of Toronto  
Municipal File No.:  
OLT Case No.:  
05 171818 STE 28 OZ  
OLT-22-002117  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
PL060106- Z060015  
OLT-22-002109  
PL030514  
3
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Appellant:  
Subject:  
Municipality:  
See Schedule “4”  
Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 388  
City of Toronto  
Municipal File No.  
OLT Case No.:  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
10 117319 SPS 00 OZ  
OLT-22-002672  
PL101091  
OLT-22-002672  
PL101091  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, C. P. 13, as amended  
1
Appellant:  
Subject:  
Municipality:  
See Schedule “5”  
Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 389  
City of Toronto  
Municipal File No.  
OLT Case No.:  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
10 117319 SPS 00 OZ  
OLT-22-002673  
PL101092  
OLT-22-002672  
PL101091  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Appellant:  
Subject:  
Municipality:  
OLT Case No.:  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
See Schedule “6”  
By-law No. 1174-2010  
City of Toronto  
OLT-22-002674  
PL101093  
OLT-22-002672  
PL101091  
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.  
990, c. P. 13, as amended  
1
Applicant and Appellant:  
CASTAN Waterfront Development Inc.,  
147390 Ontario Limited, 161774 Ontario  
1
Limited, 2017919 Ontario Limited and Marland  
III Corporation (“Castan”)  
Subject:  
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 438-  
8
6 Neglect of application by City of Toronto  
Existing Zoning:  
Industrial IC  
4
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Proposed Zoning:  
Purpose:  
Property Address/Description:  
Site Specific (To be determined)  
To permit Commercial and Residential uses  
351 & 369 Lake Shore Boulevard East  
(Victory Soya Silo Site)  
Municipality:  
Municipal File No.:  
OLT Case No.:  
Legacy Case No.:  
OLT Lead Case No.:  
Legacy Lead Case No.:  
City of Toronto  
07 143093 STE 28 OZ  
OLT-22-002675  
PL101094  
OLT-22-002672  
PL101091  
Schedule “1”  
Appellants to the City of Toronto New Official Plan (PL030412):  
Legacy File  
No.  
Appeal  
No.  
APPELLANT NAME  
Schedule  
O030146 Pier 27 Toronto Inc. (formerly Avro Quay Limited)  
O030219 Castan Waterfront Development Inc.  
O030138 Harbour Remediation and Transfer Inc.  
O030275 3C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home Depot)  
O030167 Lafarge Canada Inc.  
27  
42  
66  
68  
77  
99  
B
B
E
B
E
D
O030121 Ontario Power Generation  
Schedule “2”  
Appellants to the Official Plan Amendment No. 257 of the City of Toronto  
PL030514 O030096):  
(
Legacy File  
No.  
APPELLANT NAME  
Site  
O030219 1147390 Ontario Limited  
215 Lake Shore Blvd. E. and 178 & 180  
and Queen’s Quay Avante Queens Quay East (“Fedex South Site”)  
Limited  
(“Fedex North Site”)  
Greenland Lakeside  
Development Company  
2
017919 Ontario Limited  
351 & 369 Lake Shore Blvd. E.  
and Marland III Corporation (“Victory Soya Silo Site”)  
Marland I Corporation and 20 Polson St. and 176 Cherry St.  
Marland II Corporation  
(“Polson Quay”)  
O030275 3C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly 429 Lake Shore Blvd. and 324 Cherry St.  
Home Depot)  
O030146 Pier 27 Toronto Inc.  
formerly Avro Quay  
Limited)  
25 Queens Quay East  
(
5
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Canadian Pacific Express & 150 Commissioners St. & 155 Villers St.  
Transport Ltd.  
Concord Adex  
Development Corp.  
Railway Land Central & West  
Korex Don Valley ULC  
21 Don Valley Parkway  
O030167 Lafarge Canada Inc.  
54 Polson St and 535 Commissioners St  
Ontario Film and Television Central Waterfront Secondary plan area  
Studio Owners Association  
O030121 Ontario Power Generation 440 Unwin Avenue  
Michael Shapcott (Toronto General appeal  Housing Policy  
Disaster Relief Committee)  
Schedule “3”  
Appellants to the Zoning By-law No. 1049-2006 of the City of Toronto  
(PL030514 R060297):  
APPELLANT NAME  
Site  
Redpath Sugar Ltd. (formerly Tate & Lyle) 95 Queens Quay East  
QQE 162 Inc. (formerly Gemess  
Investments Ltd.)  
162 Queens Quay East  
Kintork (Ontario) Limited and Nuko  
Investments Limited  
143-177 Lake Shore Blvd E & 130  
Queens Quay E.  
1
147390 Ontario Limited  
215 Lake Shore Blvd. E. and 178 &  
180 Queens Quay East (“Fedex South  
Site”)  
Queen’s Quay Avante Limited  
Greenland Lakeside Development  
Company  
(“Fedex North Site”)  
Schedule “4”  
Appellants to the Official Plan Amendment No. 388 of the City of Toronto  
PL101091):  
(
APPELLANT NAME  
Site  
3
1
C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home Depot) 429 Lakeshore Blvd. & 324 Cherry St.  
307547 Ontario Limited, 1341665  
15-55 Polson St. & 222-238 Cherry St.  
Ontario Limited, & 1536165 Ontario  
Limited  
Royal Canadian Yacht Club  
Lafarge Canada Inc.  
11 Parliament St.; 130 & 150 Cherry St.  
54 Polson St.  
Toronto Waterfront Studios Inc.  
225 Commissioners St.  
2
017919 Ontario Limited and Marland III 351 & 369 Lake Shore Blvd. E.  
Corporation  
Marland I Corporation and Marland II  
Corporation  
(“Victory Soya Silo Site”)  
20 Polson Street and 176 Cherry Street  
(“Polson Quay”)  
6
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
1
337194 Ontario Inc. & 2034055 Ontario 309 Cherry Street  
Limited  
Schedule “5”  
Appellants to the Official Plan Amendment No. 389 of the City of Toronto  
PL101092):  
(
APPELLANT NAME  
Site  
3
C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home 429 Lakeshore Blvd. & 324 Cherry St.  
Depot)  
Royal Canadian Yacht Club  
Toronto Port Authority  
11 Parliament St.; 130 & 150 Cherry St.  
30 Bay St. & 60 Harbour St.  
Schedule “6”  
Appellants to the Zoning By-law No. 1174-2010 of the City of Toronto (PL101093):  
APPELLANT NAME  
Site  
3
C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home 429 Lakeshore Blvd. & 324 Cherry St.  
Depot)  
Royal Canadian Yacht Club  
Lafarge Canada Inc.  
Joseph Haupert  
11 Parliament St.; 130 & 150 Cherry St.  
54 Polson St.  
307 Lakeshore Blvd. E.  
2
017919 Ontario Limited and  
351 & 369 Lake Shore Blvd. E.  
(“Victory Soya Silo Site”)  
Marland III Corporation  
Marland I Corporation and Marland 20 Polson St. and 176 Cherry St.  
II Corporation  
(“Polson Quay”)  
1
337194 Ontario Inc. & 2034055 309 Cherry St.  
Ontario Limited  
Heard:  
May 19, 2022 by Video Hearing  
APPEARANCES:  
Parties  
Counsel/Representative*  
City of Toronto  
R.A. Robinson  
S. O’Connor  
J. Jakubowski  
Toronto Waterfront Revitalization C. Kapelos  
Corporation  
7
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
2
1
034055 Ontario Ltd. and  
337194 Ontario Inc.  
P. Harrington  
S. Tomasella  
(309 Cherry St.)  
Watching Brief Status  
Toronto District School Board  
Toronto Port Authority  
J. Lesage  
R. Blunt* (Planner)  
(Ports Toronto)  
Pinewood Toronto Studios  
L. English  
Toronto Waterfront Studios Inc.  
Lafarge Canada Inc.  
K. Mullin  
J. Fraser  
Manufactures Life Insurance  
Company  
CRH Canada Group Inc.  
J. Kahn  
Sprackman Estates 1307547  
N. Macos  
Ontario Ltd. et. al.  
Hydro One Networks Inc.  
R. Dhillon  
J. Debono  
Toronto Hydro-Electric System  
Ltd.  
INTERIM DECISION DELIVERED BY G.C.P. BISHOP AND T.F. NG ON MAY 19,  
2
022 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL  
[
1]  
The Tribunal convened a settlement hearing on the majority of the Phase 2  
outstanding appeals related to the City of Toronto’s (“City”) approval of the proposed  
modifications to the City’s Official Plan (“Toronto OP”) being the Central Waterfront  
Secondary Plan (“CWSP”) and the Port Lands Official Plan Modification (“PLOPM”) that  
modified the CWSP as it applies to the Port Lands. The CWSP was approved by City  
Council on April 24, 2003. The appeal is pursuant to s. 17(24) of the Planning Act  
(“Act”).  
8
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
[
2]  
This settlement hearing is attended by 13 Parties, nine Parties of which held  
watching briefs. All Parties were canvased as to their concurrence of the settlement to  
be presented. With all Parties agreeing with the proposed amendments and additions to  
the policy documents, the Tribunal qualified Anthony Kittel to proffer expert opinion  
evidence in the discipline of Land Use Planning.  
[
3]  
In previous decisions, as issued in January and March 2021, this Tribunal  
provided extensive background on the history of the Port Lands related planning  
initiatives, the structure and content of both the CWSP and the PLOPM, a detailed  
description of the area context and a go forward strategy for Phase 2 of the Merits  
hearing.  
[
4]  
The Tribunal notes that the terminology for the PLOPM was renamed as part of  
the March 2021 decision using the standard Toronto OP policy terminology being the  
Port Lands Area Specific Policies (“PLASP”). Both terms may be used interchangeably  
in this Decision depending on how they are described by Anthony Kittel, either in his  
Witness Statement or oral evidence.  
MINUTES OF SETTLEMENT (“MOS”)  
[
5]  
Counsel for the City, Robert A. Robinson, provided the Tribunal two MOS that  
served to further define and clarify the basis of settlements for two of the Parties. The  
MOS are between the City and:  
a. Toronto Waterfront Studios Development Inc.; PT Studios Inc. (“Pinewood”)  
marked as Exhibit 13;  
b. Ontario Power Generation/Port Lands Energy Centre (“OPG/PEC”) marked  
as Exhibit 14.  
9
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
WITNESS  
[
6]  
The City called Mr. Kittel to provide evidence in support of the proposed  
settlements. He is an experienced planner with the City and is qualified as an expert in  
Land Use Planning. His affidavit was marked as Exhibit 11 to this proceeding. Mr.  
Kittel relied and built upon the planning evidence of Cassidy Ritz, Planner for the City,  
who has supplied the Tribunal with extensive evidence through the two previous  
settlement hearing events that settled all of the Phase 1 issues.  
[
7]  
Mr. Kittel informed the Tribunal that since the May 18, 2021 OLT Decision and  
Order resulting from Phase 1 of the PLOPM Settlement Hearing, the City and  
Waterfront Toronto continued settlement discussions with the remaining Appellants of  
the Phase 2 of the PLOPM Hearing to resolve or further narrow the remaining issues.  
These discussions proved successful, resulting in the resolution of the majority of the  
remaining built form, heritage, community services and facilities, views, sustainability,  
and biodiversity issues, thereby enabling most of the PLOPM to be brought into full  
force.  
[
8]  
In his evidence, Mr. Kittel ensured the proposed settlements are categorized in  
keeping with their relationship to the subject planning instrument. The Tribunal will  
follow the same approach in its review of proposed modifications found in this Decision.  
PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS  
[
9]  
At the outset of his evidence, Mr. Kittel stated that in formulating his opinion on  
the policies of the PLOPM, as modified through settlement discussions with the Parties,  
he considered the applicable legislative and policy context as set out in the Affidavit of  
Ms. Ritz. In his opinion, the PLOPM, as modified, meets all of the applicable provincial  
policy tests. The PLOPM policies, as modified, have regard to the matters of provincial  
interest in s. 2 of the Planning Act, conform and do not conflict with the Growth Plan  
2
019, and are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2020 (“PPS 2020”).  
1
0
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
[
10] The majority of the proposed policy modifications are found within the PLASP.  
Mr. Kittel provided detailed oral evidence and a comprehensive witness statement to  
describe the recommended changes.  
PROPOSED POLICY MODIFICATIONS  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (“CWSP”)  
[
11] The proposed policy modifications presented as settlements to the CWSP serve  
to:  
a. clarify that new development will be located, organized, and massed to  
protect important view corridors (Policy P32). This is achieved through the  
support of view studies consistent with revisions found throughout the  
PLASP;  
b. a policy framework focusing on precinct implementation strategies to  
provide comprehensive and orderly development while addressing  
important issues found in the PLASP (s. 2.4); and,  
c.  
a new section that provides specifics on what development contributions  
may be required with respect to the delivery of community infrastructure  
either through new, temporary or a contribution to a facility (s. 2.4.1).  
Port Lands Area Specific Policy (“PLASP”)  
Objectives  
[
12] Mr. Kittel explained the minor changes to the PLASP’s objectives found in  
Section 3. Changes focused on ensuring a diversity of development, excellence in  
design and the adaptive reuse of buildings and materials. A new objective is introduced  
that specifies that opportunities for community infrastructure be identified and protected  
as development proceeds, which is consistent with CWSP policy.  
1
1
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Cultural Heritage and Views  
[
13] Mr. Kittel described that an important objective of the Port Lands vision is to  
‘celebrate and conserve’ its unique history. Therefore, there are a number of key policy  
directions expressed in Section 6. Important to this objective is ensuring that the new  
experiences created, build upon the past cultural and industrial heritage of the area. The  
regeneration and renewal of the Port Lands will focus on conserving and adapting the  
areas heritage and cultural heritage features. A cultural Heritage Resource  
Assessment was completed, which identified both potential built and cultural resources  
that merit further evaluation. Cultural Heritage policies of the PLASP focus on the  
‘preservation, conservation or commemoration of the cultural heritage buildings,  
landscapes, and views’ by providing direction that include:  
a. guidance on the alteration, development, and any public work on or  
adjacent to an identified heritage building;  
b. protection of key views to important heritage features; and,  
c.  
guidance on archaeological assessments for development in the Port  
Lands.  
[
14] Mr. Kittel assured the Tribunal that the proposed modifications to the Cultural  
Heritage and Views policy are minor in nature and serve to provide further clarification  
in keeping with the Toronto OP and its existing practices and standards.  
[
15] Therefore, his recommended policy modifications include:  
a. a reference to the Toronto OP thereby providing additional guidance with  
regard to the application of relevant policy;  
b. clarity on the elements of an appropriate transition to be considered by new  
development in proximity of a heritage resource. Completion of view  
1
2
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
studies are required to be consistent with City practice. It is important that  
heritage resources continue to have a visual prominence;  
c.  
specific policy with respect to Old Cherry Street and Keating Channel is  
divided into two separate policies to better reflect the low rise street wall  
along Old Cherry Street and the cultural heritage feature along the Keating  
Channel Promenade;  
d. providing assurance that policies are not intended to impede in any way in  
the continued operation of electricity transmission or distribution  
infrastructure; and,  
e. the removal of certain redundant policies that are found in the Toronto OP.  
Community Infrastructure  
[
16] Mr. Kittel emphasized the critical importance of providing Community  
Infrastructure as a central component of the transformation of the Port Lands (Section  
). A 2015 Community Infrastructure Strategy for the Port Lands was undertaken to  
7
inform the policies in this section. Implementation of the policies in this section of the  
PLASP will result in a series of connected communities that will have the services and  
facilities necessary for a high quality of life for future residents and people who are  
employed in the area. The effect of the proposed modifications is to make policies less  
prescriptive and encourage appropriate community infrastructure in a compact urban  
form or integrated into mixed-use buildings. These changes will allow for greater  
flexibility to explore innovative opportunities that may present themselves as  
development proceeds.  
[
17] Program related changes include the assurance of dedicated access to open  
space in shared use public parks and school facilities and the provision of non-profit  
childcare facilities in Villiers Island.  
1
3
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Inclusive Communities  
[
18] Mr. Kittel noted that the development of the Port Lands represents an opportunity  
to provide both a significant amount and range of new housing both in form and tenure  
Section 8). A central policy objective found both in the Toronto OP and the CWSP, is  
(
the importance of providing ‘a full range of housing in terms of form, tenure and  
affordability.’ These themes are continued and reinforced within the PLASP by ensuring  
a variety of unit sizes; a healthy balance of different housing types, tenures and  
affordability levels and the fostering of a high quality living environment.  
[
19] Modifications presented to the Tribunal relate to the removal of minimum unit  
sizes to allow for greater flexibility with respect to unit size and configuration.  
[
20] Some policies of Section 8, in areas they are contested, are not brought into  
effect yet, in light of the City-wide work.  
Movement and Access  
[
21] The majority of Movement and Access policies (Section 9) have been brought  
into force through previous Tribunal decisions. Mr. Kittel advised that the only  
modification to this policy section relates to ensuring that servicing and utility  
infrastructure needs are taken into account when designing streets, with respect to  
appropriate movement and access.  
Built Form  
[
22] Mr. Kittel’s evidence demonstrated that much of the settlement discussions  
centred around the various Built Form policies in the PLASP (Section 10). The existing  
policies provide a ‘high-level’ built form direction for the CWSP and the Port Lands. The  
intention is that the Port Lands are to be developed at a medium scale with some lower  
elements and higher buildings at appropriate locations. Design objectives are identified  
in the Port Lands Planning Framework and policies, which serve to speak to the six  
1
4
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
design principles that apply either broadly across the area or within a smaller  
geographic area.  
[
23] Mr. Kittel’s evidence is that the majority of the proposed built form modifications  
were arrived at collaboratively, with the remaining Parties, in an effort to provide a more  
flexible policy framework needed to address built form solutions. He made specific note  
that all suggested changes are in keeping with the original policy intent, built form  
criteria and vision as articulated in the relevant precinct plans.  
[
24] Proposed modifications included:  
a. removing the reference to tall building zones and clarifying the placement of  
buildings to preserve and frame views and heritage resources. Defines how  
the appropriate location for tall buildings will be determined;  
b. ensuring the provision of high standards for sun on public streets, parks,  
and open spaces.  
c.  
allowing the exemption of public utility buildings from adaptive reuse policies  
because of the atypical design to ensure safety and the ability to meet  
operational requirements. Policy continues to provide direction on the  
design of new buildings to be capable of being adapted for reuse. Also,  
secure perimeters for operational or safety reasons of the existing utilities  
located in the Port Lands is addressed;  
d. urban street edge relationships to the built form are important design  
considerations. Policy modifications serve to further clarify and provide  
some additional flexibility by including a greater focus on strategies to  
animate the public realm and clarify that the policies apply to retail, service,  
office, and other permitted activation uses;  
e. provisions to ensure a dynamic and distinctive sky-line is an outcome and  
ensuring the visual prominence of the existing heritage resources; and,  
1
5
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
f.  
a series of minor modifications that include minimum floor to ceiling heights  
for retail and service uses; a specified floors plate for residential or mixed-  
use buildings to enable greater design flexibility; a clarification of where  
building separation distances apply; and the separation distances may then  
be determined at the precinct planning stage; and stepback requirements  
for the tower component of a tall building.  
[
25] Mr. Kittel advised the Tribunal that because of the size and diversity of the Port  
Lands, the PLASP consists of a number of precincts which have specific policies to  
guide the long term vision of each. In this Hearing, policy modifications for five  
precincts are introduced for: Villiers Island, (Section 10.8), Polson Quay/South River  
(Section 10.10) and Media City (Section 10.11).  
Villiers Island Built Form  
[
26] Mr. Kittel described the vision of Villiers Island as a sustainable island community  
located close to the City’s downtown that is surrounded by water on all sides. The  
precinct plan established built form principles, a street and block network, height,  
massing standards for a mid-rise community with some tall buildings of moderate height  
and the public realm.  
[
27] The evidence of Mr. Kittel demonstrates that the proposed policy modifications  
are minor in nature and serve to provide the appropriate flexibility in built form and  
height and are best achieved within the context of ‘the very specific and detailed PLASP  
policies.’ All are consistent with the Council adopted PLOPM. Proposed modifications  
include:  
a. clarifying the built form along the Old Cherry Street Corridor and Keating  
Channel;  
b. provisions to permit a modern, compact urban elementary school adjacent  
to the Keating Channel;  
1
6
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
c.  
clarification and provision of flexibility with respect to the permitted heights  
of mid-rise buildings and the provision of above grade parking structures;  
and,  
d. clarity with respect to the locations for tall buildings in keeping with the  
precinct plan.  
[
28] These changes include the removal of the specific tall building height regime and  
identifies potential areas where there are opportunities for tall buildings that exceed the  
heights originally contemplated. It is anticipated that height limits will be included in the  
area-specific zoning by-law.  
Polson Quay/South River  
[
29] Mr. Kittel testified that built form policies in these two precincts were not  
addressed in any detail within the PLASP as it is expected that further detail would  
come during a subsequent precinct planning stage. Hence, general policy direction is  
provided with respect to ensuring that building massing and siting does not obstruct and  
maintains a high degree of visibility of existing heritage buildings from the existing public  
promenade located at the base of Yonge Street eastward to Sherbourne Common. To  
achieve this objective, care in the siting of local parks and building heights are important  
policy considerations.  
[
30] Again, Mr. Kittel testified that the proposed policy modifications are minor and  
intended to provide an appropriate level of flexibility in how built form and heights are  
achieved in keeping with the overall PLASP policy framework. Proposed modifications  
include:  
a. clarification that view studies will be completed to ensure the Hearn  
Chimney Stack, or the Canada Cement Company silo are appropriately  
considered. Mid-rise and tall building placement will be determined at the  
precinct planning stage in keeping with the robust heritage, views and built  
form policy direction of the PLASP; and,  
1
7
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
b. a recognition that the Lafarge Cement Company Terminal located on Polson  
Quay will continue for the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is prudent to add  
two new policies that provide greater flexibility in this precinct’s built form to  
manage potential land use and compatibility issues that may arise as the  
Port Lands evolve, including the potential for re-location of the Lafarge  
Cement Company Terminal. Policy additions note that the Precinct Plan for  
Polson Quay is the appropriate time to deal with more detailed phasing and  
compatibility issues.  
Media City  
[
31] Mr. Kittel advised the Tribunal that new built form policies specific to the Media  
City Precinct are based on a collaboration with Pinewood Toronto Studios Development  
and Toronto Waterfront Studios (collectively “Pinewood”) as the draft Production,  
Creative and Interactive Core Urban Design Guidelines are established. All of the  
proposed modifications are the result of an iterative planning process and the build on  
both the settlements of Phase 1 of this matter and the evolution of the Pinewood’s  
Master Plan.  
[
32] Mr. Kittel introduced both minor policy revisions and new policies that include  
permission for a limited number of tall buildings in strategic locations, subject to shadow  
and height criteria and a recognition of such in policy. After considerable testing of tall  
buildings, City staff are satisfied as to their appropriateness adjacent to the frontages of  
the Don Roadway, Commissioners Street, and the future Broadview Extension.  
Collaboration will continue as the Creative and Interactive Core Urban Design  
Guidelines are further refined.  
Arts and Culture  
[
33] Mr. Kittel described how the Port Lands have been identified as an area with  
significant potential to include significant major cultural sites (Section 11). To implement  
this vision, City Council adopted a coordinated Central Waterfront Public Art Program  
1
8
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
(“Public Art Program”) intended to inspire public art installations within the public realm.  
The PLASP maintains this policy direction for both public and private lands by defining  
funding, management of funds and potential locations where they permanently could be  
located.  
[
34] In discussions with the representatives of 309 Cherry Street, wording changes  
specifically referencing “significant public investment” in publicly owned parks, open  
spaces and streets is proposed to be removed. Mr. Kittel assured the Tribunal that the  
removal of this reference in no way ‘change the intent or effect’ of this policy or funding  
or the City’s Public Art Program.  
Innovation and Sustainability  
[
35] Mr. Kittel, in his evidence, observed that the vision of a fully developed Port  
Lands is ‘to be a globally-significant, sustainable and resilient new Toronto city district in  
close proximity to Downtown Toronto.’ Innovation and sustainability policies found in  
the PLASP build upon the CWSP principles to promote a ‘clean and green  
environment.’ Much has changed since the original construct of the CWSP policies and  
the PLASP policy framework is informed by considerable research and analysis.  
[
36] Mr. Kittel testified that the proposed policy modifications are generally minor in  
nature, serve to update sustainability terminology, clarify the City’s sustainably  
expectations and allow greater flexibility in how sustainability objectives are achieved in  
the Port Lands. All of the proposed modifications are consistent with the evolution of  
the City’s overall sustainability policies and practices. He is confident that these  
changes adhere to current best practices and proven innovation technologies and  
approaches.  
[
37] Proposed modifications include:  
a. changes to how district wide net zero may be achieved. Flexibility is  
introduced so as to not constrain innovation while being responsive to the  
1
9
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Toronto Green Standard and Waterfront Toronto’s Green Building  
Requirements, to provide further specifics on the City’s evolving energy  
efficiency standards;  
b. clarity within Media City on how development can be passively designed  
and meet City Green Standards. A new policy is introduced to provide policy  
guidance on a thermal network and urban forest requirements of the  
Production, Creative and Interactive Core Urban Design Guidelines and  
Pinewood’s Master Plan. Additional clarity and flexibility with respect to  
meeting the challenges of the Port Landsinnovation and policy objectives  
on either a campus-wide or district scale; and,  
c. a number of detailed modifications with respect to passive design and  
maximizing daylight within the interior of buildings; recognizing that a variety  
of approaches may be appropriate in the minimization of heat transfer  
through the façade; flexibility in the use of advanced window options; the  
recognition of different approaches to stormwater management; a broader  
suite of low-impact development strategies and the encouragement of on-  
site generation of renewable energy.  
Biodiversity  
[
38] Mr. Kittel demonstrated how the Port Lands are important to the City’s overall  
natural system (Section 13). The main components of this rich biodiversity are the  
naturalization of the mouth of the Don River, the Environmentally Significant Area south  
of Unwin Avenue and Tommy Thompson Park. He explained how the City met the  
challenges of creating a policy framework to support both the rich natural diversity and  
the continued evolution of the Port Lands by making use of a biodiversity working group.  
Policy direction came from the efforts of this working group along with a series of  
strategies to ensure successful implantation.  
2
0
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
[
39] Mr. Kittel assured the Tribunal that the proposed modifications to the Biodiversity  
policies are minor, consistent with the Port Lands Planning Framework biodiversity  
principles, structural layers and strategies and are in keeping with the intent of the  
original PLOPM policies. Recommended changes include clarity of when a  
Naturalization Plan is required, and the introduction of greater flexibility when  
determining the appropriateness of habitat and wildlife corridors. Within Media City,  
biodiversity objectives are focused primarily along the Don Roadway and Ship Channel  
including recognizing the challenges of introducing a biodiverse landscape and urban  
canopy in a dense and urban film studio campus.  
Other Policy Modification Considerations  
[
40] Mr. Kittel described a number of minor policy modifications to:  
a. Municipal Servicing Utilities and Green infrastructure (Section 14) that  
spoke to clarity regarding the City’s green infrastructure and district energy  
connection expectations, replacing the term “green infrastructure” with low  
impact development infrastructure (Policy 14.6.2) and replacing the  
reference to the City’s Thermal Network Design Guidelines with a “district  
energy developer’s connection specifications to allow for greater  
implementation flexibility.  
b. Implementation (Section 15) includes the requirement for an applicant to  
submit a Community Services and Facility Study as part of a complete  
application; and that policies related to the requirement to submit a  
Business and Implementation Plan prior to a rezoning only applies to  
publicly owned lands; and,  
c.  
a series of clarifications with respect to PLASP, Appendix 1 Views Map 3F  
that provides a description of the views that are to be considered in a  
development application and where the view is to be taken from.  
2
1
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
[
41] In conclusion, Mr. Kittel opined that the revisions to the PLASP and CWSP,  
which are not contested at this settlement hearing, “are good planning and by and large  
retain the original intent and purpose of the PLOPM policies while appropriately  
addressing a number of the Parties’ issues”. The Tribunal agrees.  
OUTSTANDING POLICY MATTERS  
[
42] Mr. Robinson advised the Tribunal that with the proposed modifications  
presented at this hearing, the vast majority of the CWSP and the PLOPM stand either to  
be approved or are already in full force and effect through previous decisions of the  
Tribunal. He outlined how the City is dealing with a number of legislative changes to the  
Planning Act and identified what sections of the CWSP and PLOPM remain under  
appeal. It is the assessment of all Parties that these remaining policies appropriately  
await the conclusion of the City-wide policy changes, presently being refined by City  
staff and reviewed by Council. At that time, further discussion will resume to determine  
how best to proceed.  
[
43] The policy areas that remain in dispute relate to:  
a. the provision of affordable rental housing, low-end market housing and other  
housing options;  
b. Parkland dedication policy parameters, extent of parkland provision and  
alternative parkland dedication policies; and,  
c.  
required s. 37 community benefit contribution requirements and rates;  
provision or public art and how these rates will increase over time.  
[
44] Mr. Robinson noted that the policies that are identified with grey shading in  
Exhibit C of Mr. Kittel’s Affidavit, contained in Exhibit 11 to this proceeding, may be  
subject to change pending the completion of City-wide work on these important policy  
initiatives and are not properly adjudicated within the context of this settlement hearing.  
With the Consent of all Parties, the City is not seeking to have these outstanding  
2
2
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
policies approved in the areas where they remain in dispute, which include 309 Cherry  
and the Polson Quay Precinct. The Tribunal agrees it is prudent to allow these  
outstanding policies to be informed with and updated as required upon completion of  
City-wide efforts. Considering the lengthy time that has passed and extensive Tribunal  
engagement in this particular matter, a conclusion of these few but important  
outstanding matters needs to be finalized.  
TRIBUNAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MODIFICATIONS  
[
45] The Tribunal accepts the uncontested evidence of the City’s Planner in its  
entirety and finds the policy modifications found in the proposed settlement, meet all the  
relevant policy tests of the Planning Act, PPS 2020, Growth Plan 2019, the Toronto OP,  
and all relevant foundational policies of the CWSP and the PLOPM. City expert  
witnesses have been clear and consistent in their testimony through three separate and  
distinct settlement hearings. Each affidavit presented to the Tribunal built upon the  
basic tenets of having regard to, being consistent with or in conformity with statutory  
provincial documents. From the detailed evidence of Mr. Kittel, none of the proposed  
modifications result in a deviation from previous Tribunal approvals. They represent  
good planning and are in the public interest.  
[
46] The Tribunal is pleased to see this important City Building initiative come so near  
to a conclusion. This Decision will bring all involved close to completing an extremely  
long arduous and iterative process that included the City, many interested development  
partners and a vast array of interested and diverse public. To say the process was  
robust is somewhat of an understatement but the resulting planning framework will  
produce communities that will bring pride to all level of those involved. The City has  
done a good job in what could be considered a ‘fine balance’ of creating new  
communities, protecting, and enhancing important employment areas and the  
maintenance of a working port.  
[
47] The Tribunal finds that most, if not all, of the suggested policy modifications serve  
to either update, allow appropriate flexibility in interpretation, provide clarity to the intent  
2
3
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
of the policy, allow for the necessary innovation as the various precincts of the Port  
Lands evolve over time or bring an appropriate level of consistency to the wide variety  
of policy directions enabling them to ‘nest together’ in a helpful, constructive, and  
understandable manner. Therefore, all policy modifications are accepted in their  
entirety.  
[
48]  
With this Tribunal Order, the efforts of all Parties have served to bring the vast  
majority of the CWSP and PLASP into full force and effect. This has been done by way  
of a series of non-contested modifications that have been presented during the course  
of three settlement hearings. A credit to all involved.  
[
49] That being said, the approval of these important policy documents represents the  
start of the long and potentially arduous journey of implementation. The Tribunal  
continues to be impressed with the efforts of the City and all Parties to find common  
ground. One would hope that this spirit of cooperation will continue as the Port Lands  
continues its evolution.  
[
50] The Tribunal finds that the outstanding policies relating to provision of housing,  
parkland dedication and s. 37 requirements are best informed by and reviewed within  
the context of completed ongoing City-wide efforts. The Tribunal finds it prudent as part  
of its Order to require the City to provide a written status report no later than February 1,  
2
023. The Tribunal will be expecting as part of this status report a go-forward strategy  
on how and what is needed for the City and remaining parties to finalize both the CWSP  
and the PLOPM.  
ORDER  
[
51] THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT in accordance with s. 17(39) and s. 17(50) of  
the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13 as amended, and on the consent of the Parties:  
1
.
The appeals are allowed in part, and:  
2
4
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
a. Subject to (b) below, the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (OPA  
57) as amended by the Port Lands Official Plan Modification and  
2
appended to this Decision as Attachment 1, is hereby partially  
approved and declared to be in full force and effect for the entire Port  
Lands Area as shown on Attachment 2;  
b. Those policies that are shown in grey shading in Attachment 1 are not  
yet approved for any lands within the Port Lands Area that are shown  
in grey on Attachment 2, and as such, shaded policies are hereby  
deferred for further disposition by the Tribunal.  
2
.
THAT the partial approval and bringing into force of the policies set out in  
Attachment 1 shall be strictly without prejudice to, and shall not have the  
effect of limiting the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to consider and approve  
modifications, deletions or additions to the unapproved and/or deferred  
policies on a general or site-specific basis as the case may be, for any lands  
for which they remain in dispute such that the Tribunal may render future  
decisions and approve modifications that deviate from or are inconsistent  
with those policies shown in grey shading and partially approved pursuant to  
this Order, including approving on a site or area specific basis modifications  
to the policies in the future.  
3
4
.
.
THAT the Tribunal may be spoken to in the event that any issues should  
arise in connection with the implementation of this Order.  
THAT the City shall provide a written status report through the City Solicitor  
to the Tribunal and the Parties with respect to the status of the policies  
shown in grey shading in Attachment 1 on or before Wednesday, February  
1
, 2023. As part of this report, the Tribunal is expecting a go-forward  
2
5
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
strategy on how the City and remaining parties expect to finalize both the  
CWSP and the PLOPM.  
“G.C.P. Bishop”  
G.C.P. BISHOP  
ALTERNATE-CHAIR  
T.F. Ng”  
T.F. NG  
MEMBER  
Ontario Land Tribunal  
Website: olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248  
The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local  
Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and  
continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding  
tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the  
Tribunal.  
2
6
OLT-22-002109 et. al.  
Attachment 1  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan as modified by the  
Port Lands Official Plan Modification  
Policies highlighted in grey are deferred and are not being brought into effect at this time [for  
3
09 Cherry Street and Polson Quay, as noted on Attachment 2], pending ongoing City-wide  
work.  
Policies to be brought into full force and effect for the Port Lands are not highlighted.  
Maps A to E of the CWSP to be brought into full force for the Port Lands area as shown on  
Attachment 2.  
Maps 3A, 3B, 3C and 3G of Schedule C to the CWSP Port Lands Area Specific Policy to  
be brought into full force. Maps 3D, 3E and 3F are subject to future phases of the Port Lands  
LPAT hearing and are provided for context purposes only.  
“OPA 257 Adopted by Toronto City Council on April 16, 2003; further approved in part as mod-  
ified for the West Don Lands in 2005 by OMB Decision/Order No. 3227; further approved in  
part as modified for the First Waterfront Place lands in 2007 by OMB Decision/Order No.1905,  
further approved in part as modified for the lands south of Queens Quay by the OMB Decision/  
Order delivered on November 16, 2007, issued on November 27, 2007, further approved in  
part as modified for the Parkside, Quayside and Sherbourne Common North lands by OMB  
Decision/Order delivered on December 6, 2011, issued on January 16, 2012, further approved  
in part as modified for the lands north of Queens Quay East in East Bayfront (West) known  
municipally on April 4, 2014 as 130-132 Queens Quay East, 143-177 Lakeshore Boulevard  
East and 26 Richardson Street by OMB Decision/Order delivered on June 2, 2014, issued on  
April 6, 2016, and further approved in part as modified for the lands known municipally as 307  
Lake Shore Boulevard East, 11 and 11R Small Street and 3-7 Parliament, 333 Lake Shore  
Boulevard East and 324 Cherry Street and 429 Lake Shore Boulevard East by OMB Decision/  
Order delivered on June 22-24, 2016, issued on December 22, 2017; further approved in  
part as modified for the lands west of Yonge Street by OMB Decision/Order delivered on May  
1
, 2017, issued on August 2, 2017; further approved in part as modified for the lands known  
as 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East and 178-180 Queens Quay East by LPAT Decision/Order  
issued on October 23, 2018; and further approved in part as modified for the Port Lands by  
LPAT Decision/Order issued on May 16, 2021; and further approved in part as modified for the  
Port Lands by LPAT Decision/Order issued on [INSERT DATE, 2022].”  
SECTION ONE:  
CORE PRINCIPLES  
Waterfront renewal will not be treated as a specific project with a defined finishing point.  
Rather, it will be managed as an ongoing, phased effort, part of the much larger city-wide  
context that will carry on over decades. The principles of this Plan will act as a framework for  
the renewal activities and will be as valid 30 years from now as they are today.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
2
7
OLT-22-002109  
The Central Waterfront Plan is built on four core principles. These are:  
A. Removing Barriers/Making Connections  
B. Building a Network of Spectacular Waterfront Parks and Public Spaces  
C. Promoting a Clean and Green Environment  
D. Creating Dynamic and Diverse New Communities  
The Plan expands on these core principles. Each principle is divided into two parts: the “Big  
Moves” that will define the new Central Waterfront and the “Policies” that will bring the vision  
to life.  
In describing the planning framework for the Central Waterfront, words such as “will” and  
“must” are used in the Plan. It is recognized that the implementation of this Plan will take  
place over time and the use of these words should not be construed as Council’s commitment  
to proceed with all of these undertakings immediately. This will be done in a phased manner,  
subject to budgeting and program availability and the active participation of other stakeholders  
and all levels of government.  
A) REMOVING BARRIERS/MAKING CONNECTIONS  
If waterfront renewal is to be truly successful, the waterfront will have to feel like and function  
as part of the city fabric. The first principle of the Plan is to remove barriers and reconnect the  
city with Lake Ontario and the lake with the city. This is the key to unlocking the unrealized  
potential of Toronto’s waterfront. The new connections will be north/south and east/west.  
They are functional, thematic and symbolic in nature. The following “Big Moves” will support  
the removal of barriers and the creation of new connections across the Central Waterfront:  
A1_REDESIGNING THE GARDINER CORRIDOR  
The elevated Gardiner Expressway is a major physical barrier that cuts off the city from the  
waterfront. To ensure the success of a redesigned Gardiner Corridor, funding for major  
improvements to the road system and GO Transit/TTC services including Union Station must  
be in place. The final configuration of the Gardiner/Lake Shore Corridor will depend on the  
outcome of detailed study.  
A2_A NEW WATERFRONT TRANSIT NETWORK  
Public transit will be a top priority for connecting people and places to and within the renewed  
waterfront. An extended Waterfront Light Rapid Transit line will stretch across the Central  
Waterfront from Exhibition Place to the Port Lands with excellent connections into the city  
as generally illustrated on Map B. Expanding GO Transit rail services and upgrading Union  
Station will be critical elements of the new waterfront transit plan.  
A3_LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD, AN URBAN WATERFRONT AVENUE  
Lake Shore Boulevard will be transformed into an urban avenue through the Central  
Waterfront to accommodate its function as an arterial road. The new boulevard will be  
generously landscaped; will maximize the opportunities for pedestrian crossings through  
frequent intersections with streets connecting into the downtown core; and will provide ample  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
2
8
OLT-22-002109  
room for commuter cycling and pedestrians.  
A4_QUEENS QUAY, TORONTO’S WATER VIEW DRIVE  
Queens Quay will become a scenic water view drive and an important component of the  
Toronto street network from Bathurst Street to Cherry Street providing ready access to the  
public activities on the waterfront and pedestrian connections to the water’s edge. It will be  
designed to meet the diverse needs of motorists, transit users, cyclists and pedestrians as  
well as providing opportunities for vistas to the harbour and lake.  
A5_COMPLETING THE WATERFRONT TRAIL  
The Martin Goodman/Waterfront Trail will be completed through the Central Waterfront and  
connected to the city-wide trail or pathway system, including the Garrison Creek, Humber  
Valley and Don Valley trails as generally illustrated on Map C. Upgrades to various parts  
of the trails or pathways will ensure a high standard throughout. Floating boardwalks may  
provide public access along the head of slips and water’s edge in areas where access cannot  
be achieved in other ways.  
A6_WATERFRONT CULTURAL AND HERITAGE CORRIDORS  
Key cultural and heritage corridors will link the assets of the city with the water’s edge.  
Central Waterfront corridors extend north/south and east/west to form a waterfront cultural  
grid. Each of these corridors has a unique identity that will be promoted and reinforced.  
POLICIES  
(P1) The redesign of the Gardiner Expressway Corridor with a modified road network is one of  
the most important ingredients in revitalizing the Central Waterfront. Modifications to the road  
and transit infrastructure outside this corridor will be required to ensure the success of any  
expressway redesign. These modifications will have to be identified and substantially in place  
prior to reconfiguring the corridor.  
(P2) Required rights-of-way to accommodate the proposed waterfront road and transit  
network over time appear on Schedule A of this Plan. The rights-of-way will be sufficient  
to accommodate travel lanes, transit, pedestrian and cycling requirements as well as  
landscaping and other urban design elements. The exact location of road alignments will be  
refined through further detailed study.  
(P3) Union Station will be redeveloped to maximize its capacity as a transportation centre and  
restore its historic grandeur. The rail corridors will be upgraded to provide more GO Transit  
rail service and a possible rail link to Pearson Airport. As a separate, but related project,  
Union Subway Station will be enlarged by adding a new platform.  
(P4) New streetcar and some bus routes will operate in exclusive rights-of-way on existing  
and proposed streets to ensure efficient transit movement.  
(P5) Waterfront streets will be remade as “places” with distinct identities. Streets will act as  
lively urban connections as well as traffic arteries. The needs of motorists will be balanced  
with efficient transit service and high-quality amenities for pedestrians and cyclists.  
(P6) A water-based transportation system utilizing water taxis and ferries will become another  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
2
9
OLT-22-002109  
way of moving people from one end of the waterfront to the other. The Ferry Docks will be  
revitalized as the hub of water-based transportation activities.  
(P7) Physical connections between the Central Waterfront, the downtown core and adjacent  
neighbourhoods will be enhanced through high-quality urban design and landscaping on the  
north/south connector streets.  
(P8) Railway underpasses will be transformed into more pedestrian-friendly corridors.  
(P9) Streets that extend to the water’s edge will create opportunities to see the lake from the  
city and the city from the lake. The design of buildings and public and private spaces that  
frame these streets will be of high architectural quality and take advantage of these views.  
New streets will be laid out to reinforce visual connections between the city and the water.  
B) BUILDING A NETWORK OF SPECTACULAR WATERFRONT PARKS AND PUBLIC  
SPACES  
The second principle of the Plan recognizes the significance of the public realm in  
transforming the Central Waterfront into a destination for international tourism, national  
celebration and local enjoyment. The Plan promotes the remaking of the Central Waterfront  
as a special place imbued with spectacular waterfront parks and plazas and inviting natural  
settings that pleases the eye and captures the spirit. The following “Big Moves” will help  
transform the Central Waterfront into an area renowned for its outstanding waterfront parks  
and public spaces (see Map C):  
B7_RESERVING THE WATER’S EDGE FOR PUBLIC USE  
As renewal takes place, a continuous and highly accessible public water’s edge promenade  
will connect a series of parks, open spaces, squares and plazas, at times intimate and at  
times generous, which are linked back to the city along existing and extended street corridors.  
The public promenade will be of varying width and design such that a variety of primarily  
pedestrian activities can be accommodated and be integrated with a range of parks and  
public spaces which would allow for outdoor cafes, areas of respite, play areas, public art,  
gatherings and celebrations. Key objectives in designing the public water’s edge promenade  
will include: the creation of a diversity of spaces in scale, form and character that respond to  
their distinct context; the creation of accessible and marvelous places designed to encourage  
year round use and the creation of a remarkable public realm. This band of public space  
will be reserved as an amenity and legacy for future generations. To this end, the Plan  
designates a series of Inner Harbour Special Places.  
B8_ FOOT OF YONGE SPECIAL STUDY AREA  
The foot of Yonge Street should be treated as a special place on the waterfront, as the place  
where Yonge Street meets the lake, and be designed to include major public amenities of  
high quality containing distinctive cultural buildings, appropriate tourist facilities and a range  
of public uses and other development that will contribute to the special nature of this area.  
A dramatic new pier should be built at the foot of Toronto’s historic main street, recognizing  
and celebrating this area as the centre of Toronto’s waterfront. The Yonge Street Slip, a new  
public plaza and the pier will draw residents, tourists, boaters and cruise ships to the Central  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
0
OLT-22-002109  
Waterfront and become a waterfront icon, visible from both land and water. This distinctive  
gateway to the city will accommodate a major cultural, entertainment and tourist destination,  
possibly including ancillary hotel uses. Further detailed study will be required as a special  
study at the precinct implementation stage to review the lands available and the relationship  
between the proposed uses.  
B9_HARBOURFRONT CENTRE, AN EVEN STRONGER DRAW  
Harbourfront Centre will continue to be recognized as an area for the arts, education,  
recreation and entertainment in a magnificent waterfront setting. New public squares will be  
created between Queens Quay Terminal and York Quay Centre removing surface parking lots  
and replacing them with underground parking. The public water’s edge will be improved and  
expanded. New year-round pavilion structures will be introduced in a number of locations  
expanding the range of cultural and commercial uses. An integrated nautical centre for  
marine activities may be established.  
B10_CREATING NEW EAST BAYFRONT PARKS AND PUBLIC SPACES  
A bold new system of connected waterfront parks and public spaces will be developed,  
reflecting the industrial heritage and dockwall legacy of the area and anticipating its  
extraordinary future. Public spaces at the foot of Jarvis, Sherbourne and Parliament Streets  
will include both intimate and active public plazas, designed to preserve views towards the  
lake. The reuse of the existing Marine Terminal buildings should be investigated as a link to  
the industrial heritage of the area.  
B11_A NEW LAKE ONTARIO PARK  
A new Lake Ontario Park will give Toronto a much enhanced continuous urban park system  
in the tradition of the city’s great parks like High Park and Edwards Gardens. Extending  
from Clarke (Cherry) Beach to Balmy Beach, the new park will encompass a considerably  
improved North Shore Park, Tommy Thompson Park and the Base Lands, and will incorporate  
upgrades to the Martin Goodman/Waterfront Trail system in this area. Through judicious  
lakefilling, new parkland may be created south of the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant and  
on the shores of the Outer Harbour, subject to an environmental assessment and taking into  
consideration comments from interested parties, including the recreational boating community.  
The parks will be designed to serve the diverse recreational needs of the emerging waterfront  
communities. The lakefilling will help stabilize the Lake Ontario shoreline, reduce siltation and  
establish new aquatic and terrestrial habitats. The requirements of recreational boating will  
continue to be met within the new park system.  
B12_A NEW FORT YORK PARK  
A new park of national prominence (Fort York Park) will be created with a larger and more  
visible public space, thereby regaining the Fort’s status as Toronto’s most significant heritage  
resource. The new Fort York Park will be a national, regional and local draw for public events  
and for the celebration of its military history central to the story of Toronto.  
B13_AN EXPANDED MARILYN BELL PARK  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
1
OLT-22-002109  
Almost three hectares will be added to Marilyn Bell Park by carefully consolidating the road  
network at the west end of Exhibition Place. This will allow the park to be redesigned and  
improved as a gateway to the waterfront. The expanded park will be much more accessible to  
South Parkdale residents as well as to visitors, workers and new residents at Exhibition Place.  
B14_ONTARIO PLACE, A WATERFRONT DESTINATION  
Ontario Place will be woven into the waterfront park system with better access for the public to  
enjoy its facilities and paid attractions. A new trail system, with connections to the north, east  
and west, will bring pedestrians and cyclists to Ontario Place. With improved public access,  
Ontario Place will be reaffirmed as an important waterfront destination for major festivals and  
tourism events and for the celebration of innovative architecture and landscape design.  
B15_CANADA MALTING, A LANDMARK SITE AND SPECIAL PLACE  
The Canada Malting Silos, a landmark and important heritage feature on the Central  
Waterfront, will be retained and improved. The City will pursue innovative proposals for a mix  
of public and private activities and uses that can successfully transform the silos building into  
a unique special place on the Toronto waterfront.  
POLICIES  
DEFINING THE PUBLIC REALM  
(P10) The design of the public realm will be of a standard of excellence characteristic of the  
great city waterfronts of the world.  
(P11) The public realm will be defined by a coherent framework of streets, parks, plazas,  
buildings, viewing areas, walkways, boardwalks, promenades, piers, bridges and other public  
infrastructure and open space elements. Its design will reflect its exceptional waterfront  
setting and integrate and interpret the rich natural and cultural heritage of Toronto’s waterfront,  
its industrial dockwall legacy, as well as including the historic Lake Ontario Shoreline, Taddle  
Creek and Garrison Creek alignments.  
(P12) Parks and plazas strategically located along the water’s edge will become centres of  
public activity  in effect, windows on the lake. The termination of each of the north-south  
th  
streets within East Bayfront, or on the Quays, adjacent to the early 20 Century dockwall,  
will be celebrated by the creation of a series of unique public places (Inner Harbour Special  
Places) to reflect their history and the character of the surrounding community. They will  
provide a focal point for their neighbourhood.  
(P13) A unifying approach to landscaping and wayfinding (e.g., signs, kiosks) that is evocative  
of the Central Waterfront will tie together its various components.  
(P14) There will be a coordinated Central Waterfront public art program for both public and  
private developments.  
PARK DESIGN  
(P15) Parks in the Central Waterfront will be diverse, well maintained, animated and safe,  
accommodating a full range of recreational experiences from areas for active play, enjoyment  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
2
OLT-22-002109  
of sports and entertainment to areas for quiet solitude and relaxation. These experiences will  
be provided in a comfortable setting during all seasons of the year.  
(P16) Public community, cultural and entertainment facilities will form part of the fabric of the  
waterfront park system. A limited number of private cultural, restaurant and entertainment  
facilities may also be located in the park system provided their associated open spaces  
remain publicly accessible.  
(P17) Sustainable management practices and design and construction techniques that have  
minimal environmental impacts and return the greatest ecological rewards will be utilized in  
waterfront parks.  
C) PROMOTING A CLEAN AND GREEN ENVIRONMENT  
The third principle of the Plan is aimed at achieving a high level of environmental health in  
the Central Waterfront. A wide variety of environmental strategies will be employed to create  
sustainable waterfront communities. The following “Big Moves” will showcase the City’s  
commitment to a clean and green waterfront that is safe and healthy and contributes to a  
better environment for the city as a whole:  
C19_PRIORITY FOR SUSTAINABLE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION  
A sustainable transportation system that gives priority to transit, cycling, walking and water  
transport and reduces the need for car use will form the basis for transportation planning in  
the Central Waterfront. Future travel demand will be mainly met by non-auto means. Road  
capacity will be added only to meet local traffic needs.  
C20_PROTECTING THE WEST DON LANDS FROM FLOODING  
A flood protection berm will be built along the Don River to assist in eliminating flooding  
problems in the West Don Lands and surrounding neighbourhoods to the west. It will also  
provide naturalized open space and active parkland along its edge for use by the emerging  
West Don Lands communities and fulfill a crucial stormwater management function. The  
adjacent King-Parliament and St. Lawrence neighbourhoods will benefit from this increase in  
active parkland.  
POLICIES  
(P18) As part of the strategy to reduce car dependence and shape people’s travel patterns  
early, a comprehensive range of efficient and competitive transportation alternatives will be  
provided in tandem with the development of new waterfront communities. These include a  
new transit system as generally illustrated on Map B, as well as pedestrian, cycling and water  
transportation opportunities as generally illustrated on Map D.  
(P19) New waterfront communities will offer opportunities to live and work close together,  
leading to fewer and shorter commuter trips.  
(P20) New traffic management approaches will be pursued to accommodate non-auto modes  
of transportation, make more efficient use of existing roads (i.e., “smart” technology) and  
discourage the use of single-occupant vehicles.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
3
OLT-22-002109  
(P21) Pedestrian and cycling routes will be safe, attractive, comfortable and generously  
landscaped.  
(P22) The health and biodiversity of the Central Waterfront will be enhanced and restored by  
protecting and regenerating wetlands, fish and wildlife habitats, rare plant and animal species,  
shorelines, beach areas, woodlots and lands designated “Natural Heritage Areas” (in the  
Official Plan) and “Natural Areas” (see Map C).  
(P23) Development will contribute to the improvement of water quality in Toronto’s rivers and  
streams, as well as in Toronto Bay, the Outer Harbour and Lake Ontario.  
(P24) Stormwater will be managed as close to its source as possible.  
(P25) Combined sewer outfalls that discharge into Lake Ontario, Toronto Harbour and the Don  
River will be progressively reduced consistent with the City’s environmental policies.  
(
P26) The Central Waterfront will be a model of leading-edge environmental technologies.  
Alternative sources of generating electricity, including co-generation, anaerobic digestion, wind  
turbines and solar power, will be pursued as well as district heating and cooling.  
(P27)* The Central Waterfront will showcase successful redevelopment of brownfield sites into  
sustainable residential and employment areas. Where applicable, remediation requirements  
will be balanced by the need to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Development in  
Regeneration Areas will have regard to current Provincial guidelines and legislation with lands  
being appropriately buffered and mitigated to prevent adverse effects from odour, noise and  
other contaminants.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (P27) DEFERRED FOR ALL LANDS SOUTH OF QUEENS  
QUAY EAST EXCEPT FOR FWP LANDS BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER  
ISSUED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2007.  
(P28) Lakefilling will be considered only for stabilizing shorelines, improving open spaces,  
creating trail connections, preventing siltation and improving natural habitats and is subject to  
Provincial and Federal Environmental Assessment processes. Consideration will be given to  
the impact of such lakefilling on recreational uses.  
(P29) The creation of parkland south of the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant will be  
compatible with, and closely co-ordinated with, any future plans to expand the facility.  
D) CREATING DYNAMIC AND DIVERSE NEW COMMUNITIES  
The fourth and final principle of the Plan is focused on the creation of dynamic and diverse  
waterfront communities unique places of beauty, quality and opportunity for all citizens.  
New water’s edge communities will accommodate a range of development forms and  
be of sufficient scale to establish a “critical mass” of people both living and working in a  
neighbourhood setting. These new waterfront neighbourhoods will be acclaimed for their high  
degree of social, economic, natural and environmental health and cultural vibrancy, which  
collectively will contribute to the long-term sustainability of the area and the entire city. The  
following “Big Moves” implement this principle:  
D22_OPENING UP THE PORT LANDS TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
4
OLT-22-002109  
The Port Lands will transform into a number of new, vibrant districts with unique and  
memorable local identities and character that promote social interaction, cultural enrichment,  
ecological health, a low-carbon future, and a prosperous local economy. Each district will take  
its cue from the naturalized river valley and wild natural areas, spectacular waterfront parks  
and open spaces, and rich cultural heritage.  
The Port Lands will have an eclectic mix of uses, offering diverse opportunities for  
Torontonians to live, work and play. Intrinsic to this mix of uses is the energy, vibrancy and  
theatre of the working port and nurturing the growth of creative and innovative industries.  
A resilient urban structure will be set in place, connecting the Port Lands to the city and  
providing sustainable options for moving in and through the area. The urban structure will  
provide a robust legacy of fine-grained streets and blocks to allow the Port Lands to continue  
to evolve and transform over time.  
D23_A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE WEST DON LANDS  
With the construction of the flood protection berm, the West Don Lands will be redeveloped  
into diverse mixed-use communities. These communities will capitalize on their strategic  
downtown location and their historic roots as part of the original town of York.  
D24_THE EAST BAYFRONT, A PROMINENT NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD*  
The East Bayfront will become a prominent waterfront address for working and living amid the  
energy and abundance of waterfront activities, including a new water’s edge promenade and  
other public activities in the series of new East Bayfront public spaces. Development adjacent  
to the water’s edge promenade shall consist of low and medium scale buildings that will  
reinforce the safety and usability of the public spaces.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (D24) DEFERRED FOR FWP LANDS BY OMB PURSUANT  
TO DECISION/ORDER NO. 1905.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (D24) DEFERRED FOR BLOCKS 1 AND 2 SOUTH  
OF QUEENS QUAY EAST BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON  
NOVEMBER 27, 2007.  
D25_EXHIBITION PLACE, A PLACE FOR WORK, CELEBRATION AND LIVING  
Exhibition Place, historically a place for celebration and exhibition, will expand into a dynamic  
area where people work, visit and live. Housing at select peripheral locations will not detract  
from Exhibition Place’s primary role. The proposed realignment of Lake Shore Boulevard will  
add to the land available for development and make it easier to integrate Exhibition Place with  
Ontario Place.  
The National Trade Centre will continue to function as a magnet to attract new businesses  
and support facilities. Synergies may also be created by the presence of the new media  
businesses of Liberty Village.  
The remade Exhibition Place will feature a significant open plaza capable of hosting large  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
5
OLT-22-002109  
gatherings and festivals.  
New development will respect and celebrate Exhibition Place’s existing heritage architecture  
and views of heritage buildings from the water. Opportunities for adaptive reuse of heritage  
buildings will be explored.  
POLICIES  
DESIGNING THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT  
(P30) Development of the Central Waterfront will maintain Toronto’s successful tradition of  
city building at a compact scale combining the best of urban living, amenities and built form.  
The treatment of the development sites abutting the water’s edge, public promenade along  
the traditional urban dockwall will require particular sensitivity to create a front of publicly  
accessible and marvelous buildings of appropriate low to moderate scale to complement the  
character of the neighbourhoods and in keeping with good planning principles. The precinct  
implementation strategies will specifically address these design issues while defining their  
scale, range of uses and ensuring that the individual building design meets high standards of  
excellence through peer review, or a Design Review Board.  
(P31) Excellence in the design of public and private buildings, infrastructure (streets, bridges,  
promenades, etc.), parks and public spaces will be promoted to achieve quality, beauty and  
worldwide recognition.  
(
P32) New development will be located, organized and massed to protect view corridors, sup-  
ported by view studies, frame and support the adjacent public realm and discourage privatiza-  
tion of public spaces. Built form will result in comfortable micro-climates on streets, plazas and  
other parts of the public realm.  
NURTURING A HIGH STANDARD OF COMMUNITY LIVING  
(P33) A balance of places to live and work will contribute to the morning-to-evening vitality of  
new waterfront communities.  
(
P34) Schools and other community services and facilities (including places of worship) will be  
integral components of new waterfront communities and will be provided in conjunction with  
new development (Appendix I).  
(P35) Local parks will enrich new waterfront communities. Parks planning will take into ac-  
count such factors as park size, land availability, neighbourhood accessibility, safety and qual-  
ity of experience in park spaces (Appendix I).  
(P36) Innovative approaches for providing the necessary community infrastructure will be  
explored, including shared use of schools, community services and facilities and local parks as  
well as integrating community facilities into private developments.  
(P37) Public spaces, parks, transportation facilities and other public and private buildings in  
the Central Waterfront will be designed to ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities.  
HOUSING OPTIONS  
(P38) A mix of housing types, densities and tenures will accommodate a broad range of house-  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
6
OLT-22-002109  
hold sizes, composition, ages and incomes contributing to the vitality of the Central Waterfront  
as well as the opportunity for residents to remain in their communities throughout their lives.  
(P39) The overall goal for the Central Waterfront is that affordable rental housing and low-end-  
of-market housing comprise 25 per cent of all housing units (see Definitions in Schedule B).  
To the extent possible, and subject to the availability of funding programs and development  
cross-subsidization, the greatest proportion of this housing will be affordable rental with at least  
one-quarter in the form of two-bedroom units or larger. Senior government funding programs  
to assist in the delivery of affordable rental housing will be aggressively pursued, and appropri-  
ate opportunities identified to take advantage of such programs.  
CREATING SPECIAL PLACES TO WORK  
(P40) The Central Waterfront will accommodate a variety of maritime activities, including  
cargo shipping, cross-lake ferry service, local ferry and water taxi terminals, excursion boats,  
cruise ships, berthing areas and marinas, maritime support services and the Port of Toronto.  
(P41)* Land, dockwall and rail service will be sufficient to meet the needs of industry, cargo  
shipping, passenger cruise ships, ferries, excursion boats, recreational boating and other  
water-dependent activities.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (P41) DEFERRED FOR LANDS SOUTH OF QUEENS  
QUAY EAST EXCEPT FOR FWP LANDS BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ ORDER  
ISSUED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2007.  
*
(
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (P41) DEFERRED FOR LANDS IN EAST BAYFRONT  
WEST) LOCATED NORTH OF QUEENS QUAY EAST AND EAST OF SHERBOURNE  
STREET BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY 16, 2012.  
(P42) Development in the Port Lands will be in accordance with the vision established in Big  
Move D22 and the Port Lands Area Specific Policy attached as Schedule C.  
(P43) Large scale, stand-alone retail stores and/or “power centres” are not part of the vision  
for the Central Waterfront. New retail development will only be considered within the context  
of the City’s urban planning principles and must be supportive of the other core principles and  
policies of this Plan. Retail and other uses which require large areas of unscreened surface  
parking will not be permitted. In regards to the lands within the West Don Lands, this policy  
does not supersede S. 10.2 and S. 5.3 of the King Parliament Secondary Plan.  
(P44) Companies that rely on lake access for their operations will remain important maritime  
industries on the waterfront to the extent that they can be accommodated within emerging  
communities.  
CREATING SPECIAL PLACES TO VISIT, RELAX, PLAY AND LEARN  
(P45) The Central Waterfront will become the face of Toronto to the world, with a quality  
of experience and environment comparable to that of other international cities, a place to  
express the future of the city with confidence and imagination.  
(P46) Strategies to attract high-value tourism to the Central Waterfront will receive top  
priority in order to strengthen Toronto’s role as the cultural capital of the nation. The Central  
Waterfront will be the future location of major international-caliber cultural, entertainment and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
7
OLT-22-002109  
other tourist attractions.  
P47) A wide variety of year-round experiences for visitors will be offered. Emphasis will be  
(
placed on developing new facilities that are enduring, creative and unique to Toronto and its  
waterfront. Winter conditions will be an important consideration in developing the Central  
Waterfront’s tourism infrastructure.  
(P48) Boating opportunities will be expanded to draw city residents, workers and tourists  
to the waterfront. The Central Waterfront offers an opportunity to provide internationally  
acclaimed boating facilities, particularly in the Outer Harbour. The design, location and  
viability of such facilities will be developed further in the Precinct Implementation Strategies, in  
consultation with the appropriate stakeholders.  
(
P49) Toronto’s story will be told by preserving the waterfront’s cultural and natural heritage in  
the development of new private and public spaces, some of which are designated as the Inner  
Harbour Special Places.  
(P50) Heritage properties listed on the City’s Inventory of Heritage Property will be protected  
and improved where feasible. Designated heritage buildings will be conserved for creative  
reuse in their original locations.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (P51) DEFERRED FOR LANDS WEST OF YONGE STREET  
BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON AUGUST 2, 2017.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (P51) DEFERRED FOR THE LANDS KNOWN AS 162  
QUEENS QUAY EAST BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON APRIL 6,  
016.  
2
(P51) The Redpath facility is an important feature of the Toronto Waterfront that should be  
maintained. It is a symbol of the Waterfront’s industrial heritage and an important employment  
generator relying on lake access and the dockwall for its operations. This Plan recognizes  
that the Redpath facility refines a significant amount of raw sugar for Canadian distribution  
and encourages its retention. Future developments should ensure that there are no undue  
negative impacts on Redpath’s activities.  
As a result of consultations with Redpath and the Ministry of the Environment concerning  
land-use compatibility issues between the Redpath facility and future land uses in the vicinity  
of the plant, the following additional policies will apply to: (i) the lands south of Queens  
Quay East in East Bayfront (West); (ii) the lands north of Queens Quay East and east of  
Sherbourne Street in East Bayfront (West); and (iii) the lands north of Queens Quay East in  
East Bayfront (West) known municipally in the year 2014 as 143-177 Lake Shore Boulevard  
East, 130-132 Queens Quay East and 26 Richardson Street, and 162 Queens Quay East,  
notwithstanding any conflicts with other policies of this Plan.  
When considering development approval applications and public realm initiatives, regard shall  
be had to all applicable provincial and municipal policies, regulations and guidelines to ensure  
that compatibility will be achieved and maintained with regard to noise, dust, odour, and air  
quality so as to achieve the goals of:  
(i)  
preventing undue adverse impacts from the proposed land use on the Redpath lands  
designated as an Existing Use Area; and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
8
OLT-22-002109  
(ii)  
preventing undue adverse impacts on the new land use from the Redpath lands desig-  
nated as an Existing Use Area.  
Sensitive land uses may be prohibited in the implementing zoning, limited and/or protected,  
through phasing, massing and siting, buffering and design mitigation measures in proximity to  
Redpath to ensure compatibility. In addition, noise and air emissions reports shall be required  
in support of development approval requests. Such environmental reports are to specify  
how compatibility will be achieved and maintained between Redpath and the proposed  
development and may include measures aimed at minimizing impacts.  
Council acknowledges the important role of the Ministry of the Environment in reviewing and  
providing comments and recommendations on such reports. The City shall consult with both  
the Ministry of the Environment and Redpath during the development approval process and  
during the design process for public spaces in the vicinity of the Redpath property to ensure  
compatibility.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (P52) DEFERRED FOR THE LANDS KNOWN AS 162  
QUEENS QUAY EAST BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON APRIL6,  
016.  
2
(P52) Relating to lands known municipally in the year 2014 as 143-177 Lake Shore Boulevard  
East, 130-132 Queens Quay East and 26 Richardson Street, and 162 Queens Quay East:  
(i)  
Site specific built form permissions, including height, density and massing, are to be  
approved in accordance with a comprehensive approach based on the principles and  
intent of the Precinct Implementation Strategies.  
(ii)  
New development in the East Bayfront will be mid-rise, punctuated by taller buildings  
where Lake Shore Boulevard East intersects with major north/south streets. Tall build-  
ing locations, heights, floorplate size and separation distances are defined in the at-  
tached site specific maps.  
(iii)  
Specific locations of taller and base buildings shall be carefully designed and organized  
to ensure that they do not overwhelm or undermine the quality of the adjacent public  
street, and public and private open spaces. The street wall shall include breaks in the  
massing to allow sunlight to penetrate onto Lake Shore Boulevard East, as well as  
public or private open space. Upper level step-backs shall be utilized to reduce building  
scale adjacent to the public sidewalk.  
(
iv)  
v)  
Queens Quay will be the East Bayfront’s primary street and the central spine of the  
Precinct’s public realm. Buildings fronting Queens Quay will reinforce this role and the  
street’s importance with a consistent street wall of buildings at a robust mid-rise scale,  
and provide active animation uses with doors and windows at grade along the street.  
(
Individual building heights adjacent to Queens Quay will reference common datum  
lines, one at 38 metres emphasizing the predominant height of the street, and a lower  
datum line at the more intimate scale of approximately 25 metres, where appropriate.  
This will give Queens Quay a unified and coordinated appearance at a scale that will  
not overwhelm the adjacent streets. The intermittent 25 metre lower building height will  
soften the visual impact of the 38m high buildings, and permit sunlight to penetrate into  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
3
9
OLT-22-002109  
the blocks to the north. Where building heights are in excess of 38m along the Queens  
Quay frontage, any increases to the height and numbers of buildings have been careful-  
ly considered based on site specific review.  
P53 (DEFERRED)  
P54) This area-specific policy applies to the lands shown on Maps H1 and H2, generally  
(
described in this section as the Keating Channel West precinct  
a)  
The Keating Channel West precinct will be a vibrant, mixed-use waterfront community  
that builds on the legacy and amenity of the historic Keating Channel. The precinct  
will provide transitions and connections between and be compatible with the adjacent  
West Don Lands, East Bayfront, and Villiers Island precincts.  
b)  
Public streets, public parks (including the water’s edge promenade), and a range of  
well-distributed publicly accessible open space will comprise a comprehensive and  
coherent public realm. The public realm will define individual development sites, pro-  
vide public amenity, and be sufficient to support the level of development anticipated in  
the Keating Channel West precinct. Development will complement the character and  
quality of the adjacent public realm and reinforce its public nature. The planned pub-  
lic realm network is generally shown on Map H1; key elements of the public realm will  
include the following:  
1
. Queens Quay will extend from the Parliament Street slip to Cherry Street and will  
be the Keating Channel West precinct’s primary street and its central spine;  
2
3
4
. a water’s edge street and promenade will provide public access, amenity, and an  
animated public space immediately adjacent to the waterfront;  
. a realigned Cherry Street will provide an important north-south connection through  
the precinct to the West Don Lands and to the Port Lands;  
. new public local streets will provide access to development blocks for vehicles,  
pedestrians, and cyclists and contribute to a fine-grained, well-connected public  
realm; and  
5
. privately-owned, publicly accessible open spaces, walkways, and streets will create  
intimate public spaces and permeability through development blocks and comple-  
ment other key elements of the public realm.  
c)  
d)  
Development with frontage on Queens Quay and development facing the water’s edge  
will complement the character and quality of the adjacent public realm by providing a  
fine-grain and high-quality mix of ground-floor animation uses, with doors and windows  
at grade level, which promote pedestrian activity and facilitate a spectacular and highly  
accessible public realm, and support the objectives set out in Sections A4 and B7, and  
Policies P30, P31, and P32 of this Plan.  
New development in the Keating Channel West precinct will be mid-rise, punctuated  
by tall buildings in locations determined within the context of this Secondary Plan and  
shown on Map H2. Development will:  
1
. locate and mass new buildings to frame the public realm with good proportion to  
adjacent public spaces and to provide pedestrian comfort and safety within adja-  
cent streets, parks, and publicly accessible open spaces;  
2
. provide sunlight and comfortable wind conditions for pedestrians on adjacent  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
0
OLT-22-002109  
streets, parks, and open spaces;  
3
. utilize upper-level step-backs to reduce building scale adjacent to the public side-  
walks along the north side of Queens Quay; south side of Queens Quay east of the  
new Trinity Street; the new Cherry Street; and the water’s edge street;  
4
5
. exemplify excellence in design and materials; and  
. provide consistently massed mid-rise buildings and base buildings.  
e)  
f)  
Development adjacent to the water’s edge street and facing Keating Channel will  
consist of low- and medium-scaled built form that will reinforce the pedestrian comfort,  
safety and usability of adjacent public spaces. Development will generally transition  
upward from a height of approximately 11 metres adjacent to the water’s edge street.  
Development fronting onto Queens Quay will reinforce its role as the Keating Channel  
Precinct’s primary street by providing a consistent street wall of buildings at a robust  
mid-rise scale. Further to this purpose:  
1
. Building height limits for mid-rise buildings and base buildings adjacent to Queens  
Quay will reference two common datum lines, one at a maximum height of 23 me-  
tres and one at a maximum height of 38 metres. Building heights of 23 metres will  
frame the public street as a comfortable pedestrian space. Building heights of 38  
metres will generally express the principle of a 1:1 ratio of building height to right-  
of-way width and will be stepped back above a height of 23 metres. The zoning  
by-law will limit those areas subject to the 38 metre height limit, in order to ensure  
that the 23 metre datum line is predominant.  
2
. Notwithstanding the policy objective expressed in paragraph f) and otherwise in  
h) above, to achieve a consistent street wall of new buildings along Queens Quay,  
breaks in the streetwall may be made to accommodate high-quality parks and pub-  
licly accessible open spaces that give prominence to the heritage Victory Soya Mills  
silos, that provide publicly accessible open space in association with significant  
cultural or institutional uses, support ground-related uses, or in connection with the  
water’s edge.  
g)  
h)  
Tall buildings will be limited in number and located in accordance with this plan. The  
general locations and maximum permitted heights of tall buildings are shown on Map  
H2.  
1
. Tall buildings will be located to be broadly separated and associated with major  
intersections, particularly intersections with Lake Shore Boulevard East.  
Development in the specific areas shown on Map 1 will be limited as follows:  
1
. To a maximum of 53,350 square metres of gross floor area in Area A1 ( 307 Lake  
Shore Blvd. E., 7 and 11 Parliament Street)  
2
3
. To a maximum of 89,000 square metres of gross floor area in Area A (333 Lake  
Shore Blvd. El.)  
. To a maximum of 234,500 square metres of gross floor area in Area C (429 Lake  
Shore Blvd. E. and 324 Cherry St.)  
i)  
In addition to the general location and maximum permitted heights of tall buildings  
shown on Map H2, and the prescription of building heights in paragraphs h and i, the  
City will adopt implementing zoning by-laws and utilize Site Plan Control to ensure ap-  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
1
OLT-22-002109  
propriate implementation of this plan’s built form policies.  
j)  
Development of these lands will contribute to the implementation of Policy 39 of this  
plan, with the objective that 20% of all housing units, measured by a percentage of res-  
idential gross floor area rather than a percentage of units, be affordable rental housing.  
Affordable housing will be secured through implementing zoning by-laws with provi-  
sions that are consistent with the following:  
1
. Affordable rental housing may be delivered through one or a combination of: deliv-  
ery of affordable rental housing units, dedication of land to the City or cash-in-lieu  
of land for affordable rental housing.  
2
3
. The amount of the requirement for each of the three delivery methods for affordable  
rental housing may be varied in the zoning by-laws to recognize the different costs  
and characteristics of each, and may result in the total achievement of affordable  
rental housing below 20% of all housing.  
. Implementing zoning by-laws will require one or more agreements pursuant to  
Section 37 of the Planning to secure and implement the provision of affordable  
rental housing in compliance with this Plan. A Master Section 37 agreement will  
set out the parameters of a phased affordable rental housing strategy consistent  
with the requirements of the implementing zoning by-law. In conjunction with this  
area-specific policy (P54) and any implementing zoning by-law, the Master Section  
3
7 agreement may be relied upon to understand the intent of requirements and  
landowner obligations related to affordable rental housing. With respect to afford-  
able rental housing, a phase-specific Section 37 agreement will be used to imple-  
ment and elaborate on the affordable rental housing provisions in the implementing  
zoning bylaw and the Master Section 37 agreement.  
k)  
l)  
Dedication of land for public streets, parks, and open spaces will be secured through  
development approval, except in specific instances where the City in its sole discretion  
determines other tools to be more appropriate, efficient, and/or expeditious. As such,  
tools to secure such matters may include, but not be limited to, agreements pursuant to  
Sections 37, 41, 51, and 53 of the Planning Act.  
Landowners within the alignment of the extension of Queens Quay East from the  
Parliament Street slip to its intersection with the existing Cherry Street will be request-  
ed to convey to the City, for less than fair market value, lands for the laying out of the  
Queens Quay East right-of-way in this location in accordance with the Municipal Class  
Environmental Assessment approved for this alignment. In addition, landowners will  
be requested to convey lands to support the new Cherry Street realignment from Lake  
Shore Boulevard East to the Keating Channel in accordance with the Municipal Class  
Environmental Assessment approved for this alignment. As an alternative to agree-  
ments pursuant to the Planning Act, the City and the owner(s) may enter into Agree-  
ments pursuant to Section 30 of the Expropriations Act to facilitate the comprehensive  
acquisition of the Queens Quay East extension and the future alignment of Cherry  
Street.  
m)  
The City will consider the use of appropriate cost-sharing agreements on an equitable  
basis among benefiting Owners related to the provision of timely delivery of transporta-  
tion and servicing infrastructure. The creation and dedication of roads shall normally be  
created through a Plan of Subdivision for future development blocks unless it can be  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
2
OLT-22-002109  
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City that a Plan of Subdivision is not required.  
Agreements among benefitting Owners may include cost sharing arrangements among  
the Owners with the City for the laying out and construction of any shared public rights-  
of-way and servicing, which are required to serve new development on a lot.  
n)  
Where development incorporates privately owned, publicly-accessible open space as  
part of the public realm, public access to such spaces will be secured through Plan of  
Subdivision and/or Site Plan Approval by way of easement and development approval  
will secure on-going maintenance.  
o)  
p)  
Site-specific built form permissions are to be implemented in accordance with the prin-  
ciples and intent of this Secondary Plan, with consideration for appropriate distribution  
of density and for comprehensive planning of the Keating West precinct.  
Where the implementing zoning by-law does not limit development density of an indi-  
vidual parcel or building, and where multiple parcels or buildings are subject to a single  
density limit, development proposals will nonetheless distribute the permitted density to  
ensure that later development phases will be left with appropriate density permission  
to express the zoning by-law’s building envelopes. Phasing plans submitted in support  
of the removal of the holding symbol may be used to ensure appropriate distribution of  
density.  
q)  
The Keating Channel West precinct is located to the northwest of the Port Lands. Not-  
withstanding the Keating Channel West precinct Regeneration Area designation, uses  
within the Port Lands currently include existing industrial facilities and operations which  
may have emissions such as noise and vibration. When considering development ap-  
plications and public realm initiatives within the Keating Channel West precinct, appli-  
cable provincial and municipal policies, regulations and guidelines will be appropriately  
applied to ensure that land use compatibility will be achieved.  
r)  
Appropriate environmental reports, such as noise and vibration reports, shall be re-  
quired in support of applications to remove holding provisions. Such environmental  
reports are to specify how compatibility will be achieved and maintained between the  
relevant industrial operation(s) and the proposed development, including any proposed  
noise mitigation in order to comply with MOECC NPC 300, as may be amended from  
time to time, or any alternative method of noise assessment and/or noise mitigation  
proposed by the noise study. The noise study shall be to the satisfaction of the City.  
s)  
Any alternative method of noise assessment and/or noise mitigation proposed by the  
noise study filed in support of applications for the removal of holding provisions will re-  
quire MOECC approval prior to the removal of the holding provision. MOECC approval  
means that the MOECC has advised in writing that the proposed alternative method of  
noise assessment and/or noise mitigation is acceptable and that industry can rely on  
same in determining its compliance with MOECC requirements applicable to the in-  
dustry, notwithstanding that such alternative method of noise assessment and/or noise  
mitigation may not be in compliance with existing MOECC noise regulations and/or  
guidelines, such as NPC-300.  
t)  
This Official Plan policy and the implementing zoning by-laws are generally intended  
to reflect the development standards and planning criteria for lands within the Keating  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
3
OLT-22-002109  
Channel West precinct so that the neighbourhood is developed in a comprehensively  
planned manner.  
P55 (DEFERRED)  
SECTION TWO:  
MAKING IT HAPPEN  
1
) A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO LAND USE REGULATION  
The Central Waterfront will have four types of land use designations (Map E):  
Parks and Open Space Areas are areas for use as parks, open spaces, natural areas  
and plazas, and can include compatible community, recreation, cultural, restaurant and  
entertainment facilities. Lands designated Parks and Open Space Areas in the vicinity of  
Regeneration Areas may be subject to Precinct Implementation Strategies.  
*Regeneration Areas are blocks of land that may be subdivided into smaller areas for a  
wide variety of mixed-use development ranging from industries to housing to community  
services and parks; from offices to stores to hotels and restaurants. Regeneration  
Areas will generally be subject to Precinct Implementation Strategies. The water’s edge  
development sites located adjacent to the water’s edge promenade and along the urban  
dockwall will be subject to the highest quality of design excellence. Development within  
water’s edge sites should be designed to create a wonderful juncture of the city and the  
Inner Harbour or Ship Channel. Development along the Public Promenade (Dockwall/  
Water’s edge) should be generally of low to moderate scale and views of the lake from  
the city protected in accordance with good planning principles. This new development can  
incorporate a wide mix of uses both public and private, including residential, and should be  
designed at ground floor level to complement the activities anticipated in adjacent public  
spaces. These sites will be subject to particular attention in the precinct implementation  
strategies to ensure that they achieve the highest quality of built form and design expected.  
The precinct implementation strategies will specifically address these design issues while  
defining their scale, range of uses and ensuring that the individual building design meets  
high standards of excellence through peer review.  
*
APPROVAL OF REGENERATION AREAS POLICY DEFERRED FOR FWP LANDS BY  
OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER NO. 1905.  
*
APPROVAL OF REGENERATION AREAS POLICY DEFERRED FOR BLOCKS 1 AND 2  
SOUTH OF QUEENS QUAY EAST BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ ORDER ISSUED  
ON NOVEMBER 27, 2007.  
Regeneration Areas (Qualified) are lands in proximity to Existing Use Areas. Regeneration  
Areas (Qualified) are subject to the policies applicable to Regeneration Areas with  
the exception that neither residential land uses nor any commercial, institutional or  
community service uses that may be analogous to residential in that they involve overnight  
accommodation or sleeping facilities of any kind, are permitted.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
4
OLT-22-002109  
Existing Use Areas are areas currently covered by planning controls that are consistent  
with the direction put forward in this Plan. These lands will continue to be governed by  
existing Official Plan and zoning controls and related Planning Act processes and will not  
be subject to Precinct Implementation Strategies.  
2
) IMPLEMENTATION  
The implementation of the principles and policies contained in this Plan will rely on a wide  
array of planning and financing tools. Planning tools may include the adoption of zoning by-  
laws, use of holding provisions, temporary use by-laws, agreements under Section 37 of the  
Planning Act, site plan control and various means of subdividing land. In addition, the City  
of Toronto has been granted the opportunity to apply a Development Permit System in the  
Central Waterfront area as an alternative zoning and development control process.  
2.1 Planning at a Precinct Level  
The precinct implementation strategies are intended to provide for comprehensive and  
orderly development and to implement the policies of this Plan. This review process will  
also deal with issues of soil cleanup, flood control and servicing, urban design, community  
improvement, heritage and environmental performance standards. Approval of new zoning for  
lands within the Regeneration Areas will generally take place at a precinct level. Prior to the  
preparation of zoning by-laws or development permit by-laws of lands not designated Existing  
Use Areas, Precinct Implementation Strategies will be prepared in accordance with the  
policies contained in Section 2.2 below. The boundaries of each precinct will be determined  
as part of the preparation of the Precinct Implementation Strategies and the related zoning by-  
laws(s) or development permit by-law(s). Elements of the precinct implementation strategies  
may be incorporated into the Secondary Plan for the Central Waterfront by way of Official  
Plan Amendment.  
Rezoning of individual sites within Regeneration Areas will generally only be entertained once  
a context has been established for the evaluation of specific rezoning applications, through  
the Precinct Implementation Strategies. In addition, area-wide infrastructure requirements will  
have to have been determined, including a fair and equitable means for ensuring appropriate  
financial contributions for their provision, prior to the approval of rezoning applications.  
Because of the area-wide, integrated, nature of developing an effective transit network, transit  
implementation must be managed on a broader area-planning basis. It cannot be managed  
effectively through precinct planning, or a sub-area planning process. To achieve the  
objectives of the Central Waterfront Plan, a high level of transit use is required in each of the  
four development areas, and it is essential that transit-oriented travel patterns be established  
from the outset. For this reason, the implementation of transit improvements will require a  
separate financial planning and approval process.  
For each of the four development areas, a staged implementation schedule and accompany-  
ing financial plan for the construction and operation of transit facilities, will be required before  
development can proceed in that development area. This will ensure that high-order transit  
services are constructed at an early stage in the development process and that the transit-ori-  
ented objectives of the plan are achieved from the outset.  
2.2 Precinct Implementation Strategies**  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
5
OLT-22-002109  
Precinct Implementation Strategies will include, but not be limited to, the following elements  
(
(
(
i)  
a streets and blocks structure that supports a broad range of development and provides  
appropriate connections to adjacent communities;  
ii)  
iii)  
minimum and/or maximum standards regarding the height and massing of buildings and  
the provision of parking;  
strategies to ensure a balance between residential and employment-based develop-  
ment;  
(
iv)  
v)  
strategies by which affordable housing targets can be achieved;  
(
the location and phasing of local and regional parks, open spaces, public use areas,  
trails and access linkages;  
(vi)  
the location and phasing of elementary schools and high schools, libraries, community  
and recreation centres, day care centres, emergency services, places of worship and  
other community facilities and services;  
(
vii) a comprehensive set of environmental performance standards for public and private  
infrastructure, buildings, and activities including, but not limited to, energy efficiency,  
reduction of CO2 emissions, water conservation, clean air and waste (reduction, reuse  
and recycling);  
(
viii) provisions for securing the retention of heritage buildings within new developments and  
an archaeological resource assessment, as identified in the Archaeological Master Plan  
for the Central Waterfront, of high-potential sites prior to development;  
(ix)  
urban design provisions dealing with the unique microclimatic conditions of the water-  
front, quality of waterfront streets, the public realm, urban plazas, parks, schools, other  
community services and facilities, and signage;  
(x)  
public art and urban design standards and guidelines;  
(xi)  
provisions for protecting and securing necessary road, transit, trails and bicycle route  
alignments; and  
(xii) mechanisms, financial and otherwise, to ensure the above matters are implemented.  
**APPROVAL OF SUBSECTION 2.2 DEFERRED IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR FWP LANDS BY  
OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER NO. 1905.  
**APPROVAL OF SUBSECTION 2.2 DEFERRED IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR LANDS SOUTH  
OF QUEENS QUAY EAST PURSUANT TO OMB DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON  
NOVEMBER 27, 2007.  
2.3 The Central Waterfront as a Development Permit Area  
The City of Toronto has been granted the authority to implement a Development Permit  
System in the Central Waterfront. This system allows a streamlined municipal approval  
process by consolidating the zoning by-law, minor variance and site plan approval processes  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
6
OLT-22-002109  
into one through the enactment of development permit by-laws.  
.3.1 The Central Waterfront Secondary Plan area, as delineated on Map E, is designated a  
2
Development Permit Area. Within this area, City Council may enact development permit by-  
laws based on the following objectives:  
to enable the revitalization of the Central Waterfront to move forward in a timely and  
strategic fashion;  
to provide certainty for matters of public concern and the achievement of city building  
objectives, while providing flexibility in the means to achieve these objectives; and  
to streamline the approval process while providing the opportunity for public input into  
development.  
2.3.2  
When determining whether any class, or classes of development, or use of land may  
be permitted, several types of criteria may be used in the development permit by-law in order  
to ensure high quality urban development. These criteria relate to built-form, use, intensity of  
use, compatibility with adjacent uses and other uses within the precinct, parking requirements,  
relationship to parks, open spaces and the water’s edge, proximity and availability of  
supporting hard and soft services, location relative to public transit and consistency with the  
policies of the Secondary Plan.  
In addition, the by-law may permit the continued use, enlargement or extension of a legal non-  
conforming use or a change in use of a legal non-conforming use, provided that the proposal  
is desirable, avoids hardship, will have no unacceptable impacts on adjoining properties, and  
is consistent with the policies of this Plan.  
2.3.3  
The following types of conditions may be included in a development permit by-law and  
may be imposed prior to the issuance of a development permit.  
requirements for the provision of bicycle trails, walkways, protecting and securing  
necessary road widenings and transit rights-of-way, parking, parkland, land grading or  
filling, storm water management and/or any other types of conditions permitted under s.40,  
4
1, or 42 of the Planning Act;  
environmental conditions related to air quality, water and sewers, flood protection, soil  
cleanup, groundwater protection, storm water management, natural heritage features and  
functions, and construction-phase environmental impacts, for defined uses or classes  
of development in areas including hazard lands, contaminated lands, significant natural  
feature areas and/or any other types of environmentally sensitive areas listed in s.34(3)  
(3.1) and (3.2) of the Planning Act; and  
the execution of agreements respecting site alteration, grading, filling and/or the removal of  
vegetation.  
2.3.4 As with Site Plan Approval, when enacting a development permit by-law Council may  
delegate its authority to an employee of the municipality, to:  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
7
OLT-22-002109  
a)  
b)  
c)  
d)  
approve or refuse an application for a development permit;  
issue a development permit;  
attach conditions to the approval of a development permit; and/or  
enter into agreements with respect to a development permit.  
2.4 Contributions to Infrastructure and Community Facilities  
The creation of new communities will necessitate major investment in roads, transit, servicing,  
flood proofing measures, soil remediation, parks and public spaces, and community facilities  
and services.  
Prior to enacting a zoning by-law or development permit by-law on lands designated as Re-  
generation Areas, arrangements will be made whereby benefiting landowners will be required  
to pay a fair and equitable share of the costs of any new infrastructure and community facilities  
required for such development, through one or more of the following means:  
(i)  
the payment of an area-specific development charge pursuant to the Development  
Charges Act;  
(
(
(
ii)  
a contribution made pursuant to an agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act;  
a cost sharing agreement involving landowners; and/or  
iii)  
iv)  
such other arrangements as may be appropriate.  
2.4.1 Development may be required to contribute to the delivery of community service facilities  
through:  
(i)  
new community service facility space on or off-site;  
(ii)  
a contribution towards the delivery of a specific community service facility that meets  
identified needs; and/or  
(iii)  
provision or contribution of temporary community service facilities until such time as the  
permanent community service facilities are constructed.  
2.5 Increases in Height and/or Density  
In order to assist in the achievement of the full implementation of the policies of this Plan,  
contributions to one or more community benefits, facilities, or services may be requested in  
exchange for a height and/or density increase above the existing height and/or density limits,  
pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, provided that the increase in height and/or density  
is appropriate, and enhances the Central Waterfront. The benefit will be secured through an  
appropriate legal agreement that will be registered on title to the lands. Increases are to be  
measured from the height and/or density for the use permitted in the zoning by-law.  
2.6 Holding By-laws  
In order to provide for the orderly development of lands in the Central Waterfront, to secure  
professional or technical studies to assess potential development impacts, to address  
issues of environmental sustainability, design excellence, soil remediation, flood control,  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
8
OLT-22-002109  
infrastructure requirements and servicing and to ensure an equitable sharing of associated  
costs, Council may enact zoning by-laws pursuant to Sections 34 and 36 of the Planning Act  
with an “h” holding symbol. After the necessary studies, plans and other matters specified in  
the zoning bylaw have been provided and/or secured through an agreement or agreements  
entered into pursuant to the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended or  
replaced from time to time, as appropriate, the holding symbol may be removed.  
*
APPROVAL OF PARAGRAPH (2.6.1) DEFERRED FOR LANDS WEST OF YONGE  
STREET BY OMB PURSUANT TO DECISION/ORDER ISSUED ON AUGUST 2, 2017.  
2.6.1 Holding Provisions Related to East Bayfront (West)  
In addition to the matters specified in Section 2.6, where sensitive land uses such as  
residential, child care centres, primary and secondary schools, community/recreational  
centres, nursing homes, hotels, private and commercial schools, or other quasi-residential  
and/or institutional uses, are proposed on: (i) lands south of Queens Quay East in East  
Bayfront (West); (ii) lands north of Queens Quay East and east of Sherbourne Street in East  
Bayfront (West); and (iii) lands north of Queens Quay East in East Bayfront (West) known  
municipally in the year 2014 as 143-177 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 130-132 Queens Quay  
East and 26 Richardson Street, and 162 Queens Quay East, the holding symbol may be  
removed after Council is satisfied, having had regard for applicable environmental regulations  
and guidelines and receiving or securing necessary technical studies, that compatibility will be  
achieved and maintained between any proposed land use and lands designated as Existing  
Use Area (even if external to East Bayfront) with regard to noise, dust, odour, and air quality  
so as to achieve the goals of:  
(i)  
preventing undue adverse impacts from the proposed land use on the Redpath lands  
designated as an Existing Use Area; and  
(ii)  
preventing the potential for undue adverse impacts on the new land use from the Red-  
path lands designated as an Existing Use Area.  
3
) SUBDIVISION OF LANDS  
The subdivision of lands within precincts may occur through a simplified Plan of Subdivision  
and the lifting of Part Lot Control, or the taking of public streets directly and lifting Part  
Lot Control where an underlying Plan of Subdivision already exists. Severance of lots in  
Regeneration Areas by application to the Committee of Adjustment generally will only be  
considered upon completion of the Precinct Implementation Strategies.  
4
) ENCOURAGING EXCELLENCE IN DESIGN  
Excellence in design will be promoted through design competitions and design review panels.  
These processes will encourage the participation of both the local and international design  
community.  
A Design Review Board will be established to review and advise the City on all design aspects  
of all development applications on lands adjacent to the Public Promenade (Dockwall/ Water’s  
Edge). The objective of this process will be to ensure the excellence in design of new public  
and private buildings, infrastructure, parks and public spaces adjacent to Toronto’s waterfront.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
4
9
OLT-22-002109  
5
) DESIGNATING THE CENTRAL WATERFRONT AS A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT  
PROJECT AREA  
The Central Waterfront is proposed to be designated a Community Improvement Project Area  
under Section 28 of the Planning Act. In order to expedite revitalization efforts, Community  
Improvement Plans will be developed to identify specific revitalization projects.  
The Community Improvement Project Area designation allows the City to provide grants or  
loans for rehabilitating land or buildings. Under the Municipal Act, the City may include tax  
incentives to encourage development in a Community Improvement Project Area. It also  
helps focus government funding and investment on well-defined, pre-approved community  
improvement projects and initiatives such as brownfield redevelopment, heritage restoration,  
affordable housing, soil and groundwater remediation, infrastructure, parkland acquisition,  
façade improvements and/or general community beautification projects.  
6
6
) TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT  
.1_Environmental remediation, flood protection measures, early construction of transit  
infrastructure, and the timely provision of community services and facilities will be essential to  
achieving the revitalization of the Central Waterfront.  
6
.2_Where applicable under provincial or federal legislation, environmental assessments of  
Central Waterfront projects will be undertaken. The Environment Assessment process will be  
an opportunity to integrate Toronto’s environmental and sustainability goals into project design  
and implementation.  
7
) INTERPRETATION OF THE PLAN  
7
7
.1_The Central Waterfront Secondary Plan consists of the Core Principles, Big Moves and  
Policies, Maps A to E and Schedules A to C. The Port Lands Area-Specific Policy (Schedule  
C) prevails over the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan where any conflict may arise.  
7
.2 _Maps A, B and D cover an area beyond the boundary of the Central Waterfront and will  
prevail over the Official Plan and any Secondary Plans for the matters covered in these maps.  
.3_Appendix I is part of the Plan for the purpose of illustration only and is not to be interpreted  
as prescriptive. Appendix II is part of the Plan for the purposes of documenting areas City  
Council have classified as Class 4 areas under the under the Ministry of Environment (now  
Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks) Environmental Noise Guideline, Stationary  
and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning, Publication NPC- 300, August 2013.  
7
.4_The Toronto City Centre Airport and Toronto Islands are not part of the Plan.  
7
. 5_The transportation alignments, Parks and Open Space Areas and Regeneration Areas  
shown in this Plan are intended to provide a basic framework for the Central Waterfront.  
Minor adjustments and additions to any of these elements may be made without amendment,  
including the final configuration of the future naturalized mouth of the Don River to be  
established through detailed design, the Queens Quay East alignment at its current  
intersection with Cherry Street and Lake Shore Boulevard East.  
7
. 6_The text and maps of the Official Plan continue to apply except in cases where the text  
and maps are in conflict with this Secondary Plan, in which case the text and maps of this  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
0
OLT-22-002109  
Secondary Plan shall prevail.  
.7 _For further clarification, the land use designation of “Regeneration Area” in the area to  
7
the south of Mill Street as set out in the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan shall prevail over  
the King Parliament Secondary Plan.  
7
.8 _ Notwithstanding Section 7.6, in cases where the text and maps of the Fort York  
Neighbourhood Secondary Plan are in conflict with this Secondary Plan, or where this  
Secondary Plan would impose additional financial obligations or Section 37 contributions  
on the blocks identified on Map B to the Fort York Neighbourhood Secondary Plan beyond  
those obligations or contributions imposed by the Fort York Neighbourhood Secondary Plan,  
the text and maps of the Fort York Neighbourhood Secondary Plan shall prevail.  
7
.9 _ Section 2.6 of this Secondary Plan does not apply to the lands in the Fort York  
Neighbourhood Secondary Plan.  
SCHEDULE A: PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY (ROW) FOR MAJOR ROADS  
Streetcar  
in own ROW  
Roadway(1)  
From  
To  
ROW  
Bayview Av  
Mill St  
Queen St E  
30 m  
26 m  
No  
No  
Basin St (new)  
Cherry St  
Don Roadway (new)  
Basin Street (Re-  
aligned)  
Don Roadway  
Carlaw Av  
20 m  
No  
Broadview Av (new) (5) Eastern Av  
Commissioners St  
Ship Channel  
Unwin Av  
35 m  
Yes  
Broadview Av (new)  
Broadview Av (new)  
Carlaw Av (new)  
Cherry St  
Commissioners St  
35 m  
Protected  
Protected  
No  
Ship Channel  
Basin St  
35 m  
30.5 m (6)  
Commissioners St  
Front St E  
Eastern Av  
36 m  
Yes  
Cherry St  
Front St E  
Mill Street  
35 m  
Yes  
Cherry St  
Mill St  
CN Railway Corridor  
Ship Channel  
Unwin Av  
varies  
40 m  
Yes  
Cherry St  
CN Railway Corridor  
Ship Channel  
Cherry St  
Yes  
Cherry St  
30.5 m  
No  
Commissioners St  
Commissioners St  
Don Roadway  
Don Roadway (new)  
Don Roadway (new)  
Dufferin St (new)  
Don Roadway  
Leslie St  
40 m  
Yes  
Don Roadway  
Lake Shore Blvd E  
Commissioners St  
Ship Channel  
Front St W (new)  
42 m (3)  
40 m  
35 m (7)  
Yes  
Commissioners St  
Ship Channel  
Unwin Av  
Protected  
Protected  
Protected  
Yes  
35 m  
Lake Shore Blvd W  
30 m  
East-West north of  
Commissioners St  
Don Roadway  
Carlaw Av  
23 m  
No  
(new)  
Front St E  
Trinity St  
Cherry St  
Cherry St  
30 m  
20 m  
Yes  
No  
a point 70 m east of  
Cherry St  
Front St E  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
1
OLT-22-002109  
a point 70 m east of  
Cherry St  
Front St E  
Bayview Av (new)  
42 m  
No  
No  
No  
a point 170 m east of  
Strachan Av  
Front St W (new)  
Front St W (new)  
Bathurst St  
33 m  
27 m  
a point 170 m east of  
Strachan Av  
Dufferin St  
Leslie St  
Commissioners St  
Commissioners St  
Strachan Av  
Lake Shore Blvd E  
Unwin Av  
40 m  
Yes  
No  
Leslie St  
26 m  
Manitoba Dr (new)  
Mill St  
Fraser Av (new)  
Bayview Av (new)  
Front St E  
Varies  
25 m  
Yes  
No  
Cherry St  
Parliament St  
Parliament St (new)  
Princes’ Blvd (new)  
Queens Quay E  
Strachan Av  
King St E  
Varies  
24 m  
Yes  
No  
Lake Shore Blvd E  
Saskatchewan Rd  
Yonge St  
Queens Quay E  
Manitoba Dr  
45+ m  
40 m  
No  
Cherry St  
Yes  
No  
Lake Shore Blvd W  
Cherry St  
Front St W (new)  
Leslie St  
30 m  
22 m (4)  
Unwin Av (new)  
Yonge St  
Yes  
No  
Queens Quay  
Lake Shore Blvd  
30 m  
(
1) Existing or currently planned roads (e.g. Bremner Boulevard) that are not listed in this  
schedule will maintain current right-of-way designation.  
(
2) RESERVED  
(
3) Includes a wide, landscaped stormwater management and linear open space feature. A 4.76  
metre widening is required on the south side of Commissioners Street. A 7.0 metre widening is  
required on the north side of Commissioners Street.  
(
(
(
(
4) The required 4.6 metre widening is required on the north side of Unwin Avenue between Cherry  
Street and the Broadview Extension.  
5) Official Plan Amendment no. 387 (By-law 87-2018) to the Toronto Official Plan will prevail north  
of Lake Shore Boulevard.  
6) The right-of-way width includes the 15 metre Public Promenade in accordance with Policy 5.4.2  
of the Port Lands Area Specific Policy.  
7) The alignment of the Don Roadway south of Commissioners Street will be shifted to the west to  
the extent possible while taking into consideration grading; ensuring that the protected transit  
corridor and vehicular travel lanes will not be located within the 10 m setback from the top of  
bank of the Don Greenway; and achievement of a functional design with the Don Roadway north  
of Commissioners Street and the protected connection across the Ship Channel.  
Notes:  
a)  
b)  
c)  
Rights-of-way will be protected to accommodate road, transit, pedestrian and cycling require-  
ments, as well as landscaping and other urban design elements.  
The rights-of-way of local streets not listed above are to be addressed in conjunction with the  
subdivision planning process.  
Council may require additional right-of-way widenings (e.g. at intersection locations) in order to  
accommodate appropriate design geometry.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
2
OLT-22-002109  
d)  
Rights-of-way requirements may be amended in the future to take into account environmental  
as-sessments, detailed design work, plans of subdivision, as well as traffic and development  
needs.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
3
OLT-22-002109  
SCHEDULE B  
HOUSING DEFINITIONS*  
Affordable Housing: Rental and Ownership  
Affordable rental housing means housing where the total monthly shelter cost (gross monthly  
rent including utilities heat, hydro and hot water but excluding parking and cable tele-  
vision charges) is at or below one times the average City of Toronto rent, by unit type (num-  
ber of bedrooms), as reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.  
Affordable ownership housing is housing which is priced at or below an amount where the  
total monthly shelter cost (mortgage principle and interest based on a 25-year amortization,  
1
5
0% down payment and the chartered bank administered mortgage rate for a conventional  
-year mortgage as reported by the Bank of Canada at the time of application plus property  
taxes calculated on a monthly basis) equals the average City of Toronto rent, by unit type, as  
reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Affordable ownership  
price includes GST and any other mandatory costs associated with purchasing the unit.  
Rental Housing  
The term rental housing means a building or related group of buildings containing one or  
more rented residential units, but does not include a condominium, registered life lease, or  
other ownership forms.  
Low-End-Of-Market Housing  
The term low-end-of-market housing means small private ownership housing units suitable  
for households of various sizes and composition, the price of which would not be monitored  
or controlled, but which, by virtue of their modest size relative to other market housing units,  
would be priced for households up to the 60th percentile of the income distribution for all  
households in the Toronto CMA, where total annual housing costs do not exceed 30 per cent  
of gross annual household income.  
*To be read in conjunction with Policy (P39).  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
4
OLT-22-002109  
APPENDIX 1  
COMMUNITY SERVICES, FACILITIES AND LOCAL PARKS  
Based on full build-out of approximately 40,000 new residential units and 900,000 sq. m. of  
non-residential development  
GENERAL CRITERIA  
Facility/site requirements  
-
-
-
shared use and/or multi-purpose facilities  
capacity to adapt to changing needs of the community over time  
all of the community facilities could be integrated as part of a mixed-use development site  
Location criteria  
-
-
-
-
accessible by public transit  
barrier-free  
grade-related  
good visibility from the street  
Guidelines  
-
timely provision of social infrastructure facilities as development proceeds within each com-  
munity precinct  
-
monitoring and review of adequacy of the community facilities shall occur once one-third of  
the potential development is achieved in each community  
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS  
6 to 10 at full build-out)  
Facility/site requirements  
(
-
-
1.2 hectares if a single elementary school is located next to a public park  
1.82 hectares if a joint TDSB/TCDSB elementary school is located next to a public park  
Location criteria  
-
-
pupils should travel no more than 1.6 km to school  
minimize children crossing arterial roads  
Guidelines  
-
-
optimal facility must be sufficient to accommodate between 400 and 500 students  
pupil generation rates should be monitored in coordination with both the TDSB and TCDSB  
SECONDARY SCHOOLS  
one at full build-out)  
Facility/site requirements  
(
-
stand alone requires four hectares, or two hectares if located next to a public park with  
adult-sized ball field and soccer pitch  
Location criteria  
locations on arterial roads with direct transit access are preferable  
Guidelines  
-
-
-
facility size will be determined by pupil generation rates within the Waterfront  
pupil generation rates should be monitored in coordination with both the TDSB and TCDSB  
LOCAL PARKLAND  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
5
OLT-22-002109  
Facility/site requirements  
-
-
-
neighbourhood oriented passive and active recreational opportunities  
size and shape will vary depending on community size and facility requirements  
each residential community shall contain at least one local park a minimum two hectares in  
size  
Location criteria  
-
-
-
intended to serve communities within a reasonable walking distance  
where appropriate, regional parkland can also meet local parkland needs  
barrier free, grade-related and good visibility from streets  
Guidelines  
-
-
distribution, size and facility mix should be relative to population distribution and demo-  
graphics  
capacity to adapt to changing needs of the community over time  
DAYCARE CENTRES  
10 to 12 at full build-out)  
Facility/site requirements  
licensed capacities of 72 children each, with 735 m of interior space and 401 m of contig-  
uous outdoor space  
Location criteria  
(
2
2
-
-
-
-
grade location is preferable  
compliance with appropriate provincial regulation and city policies  
sun, air and noise studies must be completed prior to final selection of sites  
Guidelines  
-
Daycare demand will be assessed as follows:  
number of children up to 4 years of age, multiplied by the labour participation rate for wom-  
en aged 20 to 45 years, reduced to 50-70% to reflect patterns of parental choice with re-  
spect to licensed care  
LIBRARIES  
one to three at full build-out)  
Facility/site requirements  
(
2
2
-
650 m to 1,115 m preferably located at grade  
Location criteria  
-
-
good pedestrian and public transit access  
highly visible from the street  
Guidelines  
-
one library for every community with a population of at least 25,000 residents or a compa-  
rable combined residential and office worker population  
-
residents should have access to a library within 1.6 km  
RECREATION CENTRES  
four to six at full build-out)  
Facility/site requirements  
size is dependent demand  
Location criteria  
(
-
-
good pedestrian and public transit access  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan  
5
6
OLT-22-002109  
-
-
highly visible from the street  
ready access to outdoor playing fields and playgrounds (preferably a public park)  
Guidelines  
-
one recreation centre for every 21,000 residents or a comparable combined  
residential and  
office worker population  
COMMUNITY SERVICE/HUMAN SERVICE SPACE  
Facility/site requirements  
2
-
1
929 m to  
2
,858 m of  
space Location  
criteria  
-
-
good pedestrian and public transit access  
highly  
visible from the  
street  
Guidelines  
-
one facility for each community  
5
7
OLT-22-002109  
5
8
OLT-22-002109  
5
9
OLT-22-002109  
6
0
OLT-22-002109  
6
1
OLT-22-002109  
6
2
OLT-22-002109  
6
3
OLT-22-002109  
6
4
OLT-22-002109  
6
5
OLT-22-002109  
6
6
OLT-22-002109  
Schedule C  
Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1. General  
This Port Lands Area Specific Policy applies to the lands shown on Map 3A, herein referred to as the  
Port Lands. The Port Lands Area Specific Policy will be read in conjunction with the Port Lands  
Planning Framework, dated September 2017, to provide context and to assist in clarifying intent and  
purpose.  
2
.
The Vision  
.1. Seven Big Moves that will unlock the Port Lands potential:  
2
2.1.1. The River and Don Greenway:  
a) The mouth of the Don River will be renaturalized and rerouted through the  
Lower Don Lands, south of the Keating Channel. It will restore and improve the  
ecological function of the river; provide flood protection, a variety of active and  
passive recreational uses, and wildlife and aquatic habitat; enable appropriate  
sediment management; and complement the broader city’s ravine system. It will  
provide a comprehensive system of open spaces, with municipal parkland located  
above top of bank, and will be integrated with adjacent development areas, the  
Inner Harbour, and Don Greenway.  
b) A new green Natural Heritage corridor will be created adjacent to the Don  
Roadway from Lake Shore Boulevard south to Unwin Avenue, referred to as the  
Don Greenway. The Don Greenway will function as an important natural area and  
open space connection, linking the Don River to the future Lake Ontario Park,  
Tommy Thompson Park and Lake Ontario, as well as provide flood protection  
north of the Ship Channel.  
2.1.2. Six signature north-south streets that will connect the Port Lands to the city. Each  
street will have a distinctive character and function within the overall street network:  
a) Cherry Street will be a gateway street into the Port Lands and to the recreational  
area and beach south of the Ship Channel. North of the Ship Channel,  
Cherry Street will be a key transit spine into the Port Lands and will provide a  
comfortable pedestrian environment and continuous multi-use pathway. South of  
the Ship Channel, the street will be activated and complemented by the Maritime  
Hub. The design of the street in this area should reinforce the character of the  
historic sand bar and integrate innovative stormwater management practices. It will  
also complete the multi-use pathway and include enhanced streetscaping;  
b) The Don Roadway will be extended to the Ship Channel and provide a continuous  
linear park along the western edge of the street overlooking the naturalized mouth  
of the Don River and Don Greenway. A portion of the linear park may be utilized  
for future dedicated transit expansion if required. An extension of the street  
across the Ship Channel will be protected for;  
c) The extension of Broadview Avenue will be a centrally-located civic spine into and  
through the Port Lands that includes dedicated transit and is intended to cross  
the Ship Channel, linking destinations along its way and terminating at the Hearn  
Generating Station. From the north, the street will be aligned on axis with the  
Hearn chimney stack generally to Commissioners Street, creating a view corridor  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
6
7
OLT-22-002109  
to this iconic piece of Toronto history. The exact location and design of the  
Broadview extension south of Commissioners Street will be determined in Phases  
3
and 4 of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process. This process  
will develop and consider alternatives that would require the reconfiguration and/  
or the relocation of the Basin Transformer Station, as well as alternatives that  
enable the Basin Transformer Station to remain in its present location. Phases 3  
and 4 of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process will protect for the  
continued functionality of the Ship Channel for port purposes and its ability to  
accommodate the efficient movement of ships;  
d) Carlaw Avenue will extend southward to the Basin Street extension as a  
promenade street that capitalizes on its adjacency to the Turning Basin;  
e) The Caroline Extension will terminate at the Turning Basin. The street will be  
designed to perform diverse functions with an employment area, while also  
minimizing potential impacts to existing stable residential areas to the north. The  
design of the street will incorporate wide pedestrian clearways, raised, separated  
cycle tracks, street trees, urban bioswales and on-street parking that could  
accommodate production crews; and  
f) Leslie Street will be a green portal to Tommy Thompson Park with expanded  
green space on either side of the street. The wild, natural qualities of the Leslie  
Spit and Tommy Thompson Park will extend through the street and adjacent  
green spaces. South of Commissioners Street, the street will be configured to  
enable an expanded public realm.  
2.1.3. Four east-west connections that will unite the Inner Harbour to the natural areas in the  
eastern end of the Port Lands:  
a) An urbanized Lake Shore Boulevard with a wide, landscaped multi-use pathway  
east of the Don River and the Keating Channel Promenade west of the Don  
River will unite Toronto east and west of the Don River. Additional north-south  
permeability and connectivity will be created across Lake Shore Boulevard;  
b) Commissioners Street will connect key public spaces and provide address to the  
naturalized mouth of the Don River. The street will be redesigned and widened  
into a complete, tree-lined street that integrates transit in a dedicated right-of  
way; a wide, open landscaped stormwater channel east of the Don Roadway;  
enhanced pedestrian and cycling amenity; and appropriate conservation of  
cultural heritage landscapes;  
c) The Ship Channel is a unique waterfront amenity and transportation spine. It is  
a powerful focal point around which new communities and areas of employment  
will be built. The needs of existing port uses requiring dockwall space will be  
prioritized while providing opportunities to capitalize on the Channel as a public,  
recreational amenity where possible. Along its northern edge, continuous  
water’s edge promenades and a high-quality built form interface adjacent to  
the promenades with attention to ground-floor uses to animate and activate the  
Channel will be introduced. The design of the water’s edge promenades will consider  
and accommodate the berthing of laid up industrial and commercial vessels, where  
required. Along its southern edge, areas associated with planned parks and open  
spaces will be strategically opened up for public enjoyment; and  
d) Unwin Avenue is, and will continue to be, the seam between industry and natural  
areas to the south. The street’s existing ‘wild’ quality will be enhanced with new  
pedestrian, cycling and stormwater infrastructure that hugs the treed edge and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
6
8
OLT-22-002109  
integrates existing rail lines, while accommodating continued truck traffic. The  
street will be realigned in the vicinity of the Hearn and Port Lands Energy Centre,  
with the final alignment in this area determined through the completion of Phases  
3
and 4 of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process.  
2
.1.4. A blue-green park network will be established that creates new and varied public  
spaces and capitalizes on the numerous adjacent water bodies and features to  
support year-round activation and a remarkable public realm. The blue-green park  
network will consist of:  
a) Large areas of multi-functional, public parkland (located above top-of-bank) and  
other open spaces as identified on Map C. These major parks and open spaces  
will be city-wide destination parks that will fulfill a variety of functions;  
b) A series of continuous, publicly-accessible water’s edge promenades that  
capitalize on the historic channels, the Turning Basin and Inner Harbour;  
c) Natural areas which integrate sensitively designed passive recreation  
opportunities to ensure the integrity of natural functions and habitat;  
d) Water recreation features, such as boat launches and public spaces on floating  
and/or moveable barges, that capitalize on the various waterways, while also  
ensuring the safety of recreational users and enabling continued port functions;  
e) Local public parks in Mixed-Use Residential and Productions, Interactive and  
Creative Mixed Use districts. Local parks will also be pursued for non-residential  
districts to supplement and complement major parks and open spaces and  
provide amenity for area workers.  
f) Linear open spaces that expand on the major and local public parkland and/or  
create green linkages between parks and open spaces; and  
g) Publicly accessible, privately owned open spaces within developments to  
supplement and further contribute to the Port Lands public realm.  
2
.1.5. The Port Lands will offer a number of destinations (Inner Harbour Special Places).  
These destinations will provide a wide range of cultural infrastructure, attractions,  
events and activities, both permanent and experimental. These destinations will  
take advantage of and harness surrounding open spaces and heritage buildings and  
structures to create unique draws that will attract tourism and enable local enjoyment.  
These destinations are identified on Map E.  
2
.1.6. A series of unique and memorable districts will be created in the Port Lands with  
exciting contrasts and a carefully managed interface. The active port and important  
city-serving industries will be maintained, and new, diverse communities and  
employment clusters created. Each district will take its cue from the Port Lands’  
exceptional qualities, and be conceived to have its own distinct character with land  
use, built form, and street and block fabric as key organizing and differentiating  
elements. The design and layout of new, reconfigured or relocated port and city-  
serving industrial uses on publicly-owned land will meet operational and regulatory  
needs while judiciously using land to minimize land consumption.  
2
.1.7. An urban structure, consisting of the major public streets, and the varied urban,  
open and natural spaces, will be set in place that will create a high quality physical  
environment with a coherent spatial structure. The urban structure will support the  
series of unique and memorable districts and enable the establishment of a fine-  
grained and resilient local street and block pattern capable of supporting a wide  
variety of uses well into the future.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
6
9
OLT-22-002109  
3
.
Objectives  
The following objectives will guide public works and development in the Port Lands:  
3.1. Ensure land use across the Port Lands and associated development is diverse and  
exemplifies excellence in design and the use of materials;  
3
.2. Actively pursue land uses that will shape prosperity and increase Toronto’s global  
competitiveness and drive a strong, production oriented, digitally-connected, innovative and  
diverse economy;  
3
3
3
3
.3. Optimize maritime industries and support the working port while managing the  
neighbourhood interface;  
.4. Create a diverse and multi-functional public realm with activated public spaces, the highest  
caliber of urban design and that showcases stormwater as a resource;  
.5. Celebrate and conserve the unique history of the Port Lands to create new experiences and  
bolster character both within and from afar;  
.6. Connect the Port Lands to the city and achieve a fine-grained public street network over  
time for easy, seamless access with an emphasis on transit and active transportation while  
maintaining goods movement;  
3
3
3
.7. Create inclusive, social places with a range of housing choice, rich amenity and activity for  
healthy, prosperous and resilient lifestyles for all Torontonians;  
.8. Embrace the wild, natural areas and provide access for wildlife to enable abundant  
biodiversity;  
.9. Ensure the transformation is globally significant and showcases approaches embodying the  
cultural and technological shifts necessary for climate change resiliency and mitigation;  
3.10. Ensure orderly development in lock-step with infrastructure improvements;  
3.11. Ensure that opportunities for community infrastructure facilities are identified and protected  
as appropriate as development proceeds;  
3.12. Create destinations for Torontonians, building on legacies and implement early activation  
projects to kick-start the transformation and enhance public access; and  
3
.13. Strategically consolidate and relocate some existing uses where necessary to enable major  
public works and key parks and open spaces shown on Map C, such as the naturalized  
river valley, the Don Greenway south of the Ship Channel and a continuous water’s edge  
promenade on the north of the Ship Channel west of the Turning Basin. The strategic  
consolidations and relocations will also improve public access to the water’s edge and  
support consolidating land uses in appropriate areas while also wisely managing land to  
support future evolution of the Port Lands.  
4
.
Land Use  
4
.1. The Port Lands are an important location for Productions, Interactive and Creative (PIC)  
uses, with a focus on screen based industries, as well as an important location for Port and  
Industrial uses that assist in growing and maintaining the broader city. These uses will be  
protected from displacement, where possible. Strategies for relocation elsewhere in the Port  
Lands will be developed where existing PIC, Port and Industrial uses may be required to be  
relocated to accommodate major public works and the Parks and Open Space system.  
4.2. Land use permissions and direction within the different Districts in the Port Lands (as  
identified on Map 3B Port Lands Districts) will be in accordance with the following:  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
0
OLT-22-002109  
4.2.1. Villiers Island (Mixed-Use Residential District)  
a) Mixed-use Residential land uses are permitted in Villiers Island.  
b) A Destination and/or Catalytic use will be encouraged and permitted in  
Promontory Park, and as part of the adaptive reuse of the historic silos.  
c) Source and/or receptor mitigation will be required for areas in Villiers Island  
impacted by the Cement Terminal operation on Polson Quay to mitigate adverse  
effects. Source mitigation must be practicable from a technical and reasonable  
operational perspective for the Cement Terminal operator to implement and will  
require the agreement of the operator of the Cement Terminal. Detailed Noise  
and Air Quality Assessments submitted for site-specific development applications  
will confirm the specific type(s) of mitigation to be used.  
d) A mix of residential and non-residential uses will be required in Villiers Island. A  
minimum of 15 per cent of the Island’s total gross floor area will consist of non-  
residential uses excluding retail and service uses. In addition, a minimum of five  
per cent of the Island’s total gross floor area will consist of retail and service  
uses or other non-residential uses. Combined, the minimum non-residential  
requirements will result in at least 20 per cent of the Island’s gross floor area.  
The precise location of the required non-residential uses is not prescribed by this  
policy and will be determined as zoning is advanced for the Island in accordance  
with any Council-endorsed precinct plan. For added clarity, the 20% requirement  
is not a requirement for each individual site, but is an overall requirement to be  
achieved within the Island.  
4.2.2. Polson Quay and South River (PIC Mixed-Use District)  
a) Productions, Interactive and Creative (PIC) Mixed-Use land uses in a compact  
urban form with active ground floor uses on Priority Retail Streets and Frontages  
are permitted in the Polson Quay and South River districts. Residential and other  
sensitive uses are permitted subject to policy 4.2.2 c) and applicable policies in  
section 4.7 of this Area Specific Policy.  
b) The Cement Terminal on Polson Quay is an important operation for the broader  
city. The Terminal provides cement powder delivered by vessel for distribution  
throughout the city and region, reducing truck traffic on the city’s and region’s  
streets and contributing to building and maintaining the city. It is a symbol of  
the Waterfront’s industrial heritage and an important economic activity relying  
on lake access and the dockwall for its operations. The continued operation of  
the Cement Terminal is permitted. Expansion of and changes to the operation  
is permitted in accordance with the Planning Act and subject to appropriate  
technical studies and meeting regulatory requirements. In the event that the  
Cement Terminal operation relocates elsewhere or permanently ceases to  
operate on the site, new Port and Industrial uses on the site will not be permitted.  
c) Mitigation will be required for residential and other sensitive land uses on  
Polson Quay impacted by the Cement Terminal, Port uses, and other industrial  
operations on the south side of the Ship Channel in the Ports Toronto Marine  
Terminal and South Port Districts. District-wide Comprehensive Noise and Air  
Quality Assessments, and Detailed Noise and Air Assessments submitted with a  
rezoning application submitted concurrently with the precinct planning process,  
will determine the appropriate measures, such as buffer uses, source and/or  
receptor mitigation, needed to mitigate any unacceptable adverse effects from the  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
1
OLT-22-002109  
Cement Terminal and Port uses on the south side of the Ship Channel. Vibration  
and traffic studies may also be required.  
d) Any at source mitigation proposed at the Cement Terminal on Polson Quay and  
Port uses on the south side of the Ship Channel will require the agreement of  
the operators, and will need to be practicable from a technical and reasonable  
operational perspective to implement.  
e) Any local parks located in proximity to the Cement Terminal on Polson Quay  
will be designed to limit longer-stay park facilities and amenities, such as  
playgrounds, within 70 metres of the Cement Terminal, as long as the Cement  
Terminal is operational.  
f) A minimum of 25 per cent of the total gross floor area within a block will consist of  
PIC Core land uses excluding retail and service uses. In addition, a minimum of  
five per cent of the districts’ total gross floor areas will consist of retail and service  
uses or other PIC Core land uses. Combined, the minimum non-residential  
requirements will result in at least 30 per cent of all gross floor area in each of the  
districts.  
g) The minimum 25% PIC Core land use requirement on a block may be transferred  
to another block in the district subject to demonstrating the receiving block is  
capable of accommodating the land uses from a built form perspective to the  
City’s satisfaction and rezoning the receiving block prior to or at the same time as  
rezoning the donor block. Following the transfer, no amendments to the Zoning  
By-law for the receiving block that would have the effect of reducing the PIC Core  
gross floor area will be permitted.  
h) Production studio uses, as defined in the Zoning By-law, proposed as part of  
satisfying the minimum non-residential gross floor area requirement will have the  
floor area pro-rated based on the site area associated with the studio use and  
application of a comparable floor area based on the typical floor area that would  
be generated for other non-residential uses.  
i) In addition to PIC Core uses, entertainment uses, such as nightclubs,  
entertainment places of assembly and recreation uses, will be permitted in Polson  
Quay as an interim measure in accordance with any existing zoning permissions  
in recognition that the PIC Mixed Use vision for the District may take time to be  
fully realized. Expansion of existing uses and new entertainment uses may be  
considered where the expanded or new use is in a form and scale that would not  
prevent the realization of the PIC Mixed Use vision for the District, and that noise  
impacts on nearby existing and planned residential areas are reasonable.  
4.2.3. McCleary District (PIC Mixed-Use District)  
a) Productions, Interactive and Creative (PIC) Mixed-Use land uses in a compact  
urban form with active ground floor uses on Priority Retail Streets and Frontages  
are permitted in the McCleary District.  
b) Residential and other sensitive uses may be permitted in the McCleary District  
subject to addressing compatibility issues with the Commissioners Waste  
Transfer Station, or if the Waste Transfer Station is relocated or reconfigured into  
a modernized, urban format while appropriately conserving the heritage resource  
in a park setting and demonstrating to the City’s satisfaction that a high-quality of  
life in the McCleary District would be attained. Additionally, appropriate mitigation  
of noise sources associated with the Cement Terminal on Polson Quay may be  
required.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
2
OLT-22-002109  
c) A minimum of 25 per cent of the total gross floor area within a block will consist of  
PIC Core land uses excluding retail and service uses. In addition, a minimum of  
five per cent of the district’s total gross floor area will consist of retail and service  
uses or other PIC Core land uses. Combined, the minimum non-residential  
requirements will result in at least 30 per cent of all gross floor area in the district.  
d) The minimum 25 per cent PIC Core land use requirement on a block may be  
transferred to another block in the district subject to demonstrating the receiving  
block is capable of accommodating the land uses from a built form perspective  
to the City’s satisfaction and rezoning the receiving block prior to or at the same  
time as rezoning the donor block. Following the transfer, no amendments to the  
Zoning By-law for the receiving block that would have the effect of reducing the  
PIC Core gross floor area will be permitted.  
e) Production studio uses, as defined in the Zoning By-law, proposed as part of  
satisfying the minimum non-residential gross floor area requirement will have the  
floor area pro-rated based on the site area associated with the studio use and  
application of a comparable floor area based on the typical floor area that would  
be generated for other non-residential uses.  
f) In order to buffer the film studios to the south, PIC Core land uses will be provided  
directly adjacent to Commissioner’s Street. Residential uses will not be permitted.  
4.2.4. Media City (PIC Core District)  
a) Media City is a film, television and media District with a critical mass of production  
studio and related uses, making this District an established and important location  
for the film and television sector in Toronto. PIC Core land uses are permitted  
in the Media City to further contribute to and enhance Toronto’s economic  
competitiveness, and capitalize on the District’s unique location at the juncture of  
the Don Greenway, Ship Channel and water’s edge promenade. Residential uses  
are not permitted.  
b) Active uses, in accordance with Policy 4.8.1, are required along Commissioners  
Street at key nodes in the vicinity of the Don Roadway and Broadview Extension.  
Active uses or ground floor uses that animate the Don Roadway and water’s  
edge promenade frontages will be required. Retail at grade and other active uses  
will be protected for along the balance of the Broadview Extension.  
c) Permitted entertainment uses in Media City include small-scale bars and  
nightclubs; and event spaces. Appropriately-scaled fitness centres are also  
permitted provided the fitness centre is within a mixed-use non-residential  
building and is designed to animate any public street or water’s edge frontages  
if located at grade. Other permitted cultural uses include concert halls, cinemas,  
museums and galleries integrated within mixed-use non-residential buildings.  
These entertainment and cultural uses are intended to provide additional amenity  
for area employees and to showcase the District as a hub for film, television and  
media activities.  
d) A single hotel use, with accessory meeting rooms and/or conference spaces, is  
permitted as a supporting function for the critical mass of production studios and  
related uses in Media City, subject to the following conditions:  
i. The hotel use will be located within the general vicinity of the Don Roadway  
and Commissioners Street;  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
3
OLT-22-002109  
ii. There is at least 25,000 square metres of production studio uses within Media  
City;  
iii. The hotel use is integrated in a mixed-use building with production offices and  
related uses;  
iv. The hotel use, excluding meeting rooms and conference spaces, will not  
exceed the lesser of 15,000 square metres or 25 per cent of the total gross  
floor of the building; and  
v. The hotel use will be sited and designed to attenuate potential noise impacts  
from production studio uses.  
e) Sensitive uses should be located and designed within Media City to minimize and  
mitigate adverse effects from Port and industrial uses, and energy transformer  
stations. Where this is not possible, receptor mitigation may be sufficient for the  
introduction of sensitive uses in Media City. Any required receptor mitigation  
will be confirmed through the submission of Detailed Noise and Air Quality  
Assessment(s) in support of required development approvals for such sensitive  
uses in Media City. Source mitigation is not expected to be required to achieve  
land use compatibility.  
4.2.5. Turning Basin District (PIC Core District)  
a) The focus in this District will include growing Toronto’s screen-based industries,  
interactive and digital media, and arts, design and other creative enterprises. PIC  
Core land uses are permitted in the Turning Basin districts. Residential and hotel  
uses are not permitted.  
b) Commissioners Street and any street and/or promenade frontages associated  
with the Inner Harbour Special Place are Priority Retail Streets and Frontages  
where active uses, in accordance with Policy 4.8.1, are required. Active uses  
or ground floor uses that animate the water’s edge promenade will be required.  
Retail at grade and other active uses will be protected for along the Broadview  
Extension.  
c) A single self-storage warehouse use is permitted at 495 Commissioners Street,  
provided that the self-storage use:  
i. is not located on Priority Retail Streets and Frontages where active uses, in  
accordance with Policy 4.8.1, are required;  
ii. is integrated in a mixed-use building with desirable and permitted PIC Core  
land uses;  
iii. does not exceed a total gross floor area of 5,000 square metres; and  
iv. is only permitted where the warehouse is designed as a minimum three-storey  
facility that is capable of being converted to a permitted PIC Core land use.  
d) The existing courier service use at 475 Commissioners Street is permitted and  
may be replaced or expanded in accordance with the Planning Act and subject to  
appropriate technical studies and meeting regulatory requirements. In the event  
the existing courier service use permanently ceases to operate, new courier  
service uses on the site will not be permitted.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
4
OLT-22-002109  
4.2.6. Warehouse District (Light Industrial and Productions District)  
a) The Warehouse District will transition to an area with Light Industrial and  
Productions uses as properties redevelop to complement the South of Eastern  
Employment Area to the north. New medium- and heavy-intensity industrial uses  
will not be permitted. Production studios, workshops, arts and design related  
uses, and green and knowledge-based industry uses are desirable uses and will  
be encouraged in this area.  
b) Retail and service uses, in accordance with other policies in this Area Specific  
Policy, will be permitted on Leslie Street north of Commissioners Street, and  
fronting Commissioners Street.  
c) Existing large scale, stand-alone retail stores and “power centres” legally  
established through a Zoning By-law Amendment prior to the enactment of this  
Area Specific Policy are recognized. Redevelopment of any sites with existing  
large-scale retail use permissions will be in accordance with the policies of this  
Area Specific Policy; and  
d) The existing concrete batching plant at 650 Commissioners Street is permitted  
and may be replaced or expanded in accordance with the Planning Act and  
subject to appropriate technical studies and meeting regulatory requirements.  
In the event that the existing concrete batching plant use permanently ceases  
to operate on the site, new heavy industrial uses, such as asphalt, cement or  
concrete batching plants, on the site will not be permitted.  
4.2.7. East Port, South Port East and South Port (Port and Industrial Districts)  
a) Port uses are permitted in the East Port, South Port East and South Port districts.  
b) Industrial uses may be permitted adjacent to the Ship Channel’s dockwall in  
the East Port and South Port districts provided that it is demonstrated to City  
Council’s satisfaction that lands are not required for port functions over the long-  
term and that proposed uses would not impact the quality of life of residents in  
proposed neighbourhoods.  
c) Industrial uses are permitted on lands that are not located directly adjacent to  
the Ship Channel’s dockwall in the East Port and South Port districts, and are  
permitted in the South Port East district.  
d) Existing energy generation facilities are permitted in the South Port East District.  
Any new or expanded energy generation facilities will be encouraged to utilize  
renewable energy sources to support achieving the long-term net zero energy  
district objective.  
4.2.8. Hearn (Destination and Catalytic District)  
a) Destination and/or Catalytic uses are desired and permitted. A full range of  
Destination and/or Catalytic uses will be provided within any adaptive reuse of the  
historic Hearn Generating Station. Sports and recreation facilities, office uses and  
vertical urban farms for the cultivation of fruits or vegetables are also permitted.  
b) Retail and service uses up to a maximum floor area of 20 per cent of the total  
floor area are only permitted as an ancillary use and subject to the provision of  
Destination and/or Catalytic uses.  
4.2.9. Maritime Hub (Destination and Catalytic District)  
a) Non-sensitive Destination and/or Catalytic uses and active uses and amenities,  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
5
OLT-22-002109  
such as retail stores, service uses, restaurants, outdoor patios, cafés, at grade will  
be permitted to create a gateway to Cherry Beach and provide amenity for the  
public, area businesses and employees.  
b) Other supportive and/or ancillary uses to the Port and Industrial uses in the South  
Port area are also permitted in multi-storeyed buildings with active uses at grade.  
4.2.10.The Ports Toronto Marine Terminals District (Port and Industrial District)  
a) Port uses and facilities to provide marine services for Toronto’s harbour are  
permitted, and are the only permitted uses directly adjacent to the dockwall.  
Facilities to provide marine services for Toronto’s harbour include maintenance,  
repair services, and emergency and patrol services. Should any non-Port uses  
be proposed directly adjacent to the dockwall, it will need to be demonstrated that  
such lands are not required for, and would not materially adversely impact, Port  
uses and the berthing of ships over the long-term.  
b) Industrial uses, production studio and related uses, and parks and open spaces  
are permitted on lands that are not located directly adjacent to the dockwall.  
c) Notwithstanding a) and b) above, additional employment uses may be permitted  
subject to the preparation of a comprehensive land use plan that justifies the  
proposed uses, demonstrates the lands are not required for Port and Industrial  
uses over the long-term, and includes a net gain to the Parks and Open Space  
Plan in the area.  
4
.2.11.Interim uses may be considered on lands designated as Parks and Open Space  
Areas within the boundary of this Area Specific Policy where the timing and funding  
of a future public park has not been determined, and provided that the interim use  
consists of a temporary structure; a special short term installation and/or event; or  
would temporarily support nearby uses.  
4
.2.12.Public utility uses, such as premises used for the transmission and distribution of  
energy, are permitted in all Districts, except lands in the South Port and East Port  
Districts reserved exclusively for Port uses. Public utility uses will be enclosed in  
buildings and/or attractively screened by structures, such as walls or decorative  
fencing, to integrate the uses into the urban fabric. Additional urban design attention  
will be paid to public realm frontages, such as providing landscape and aesthetic  
treatments.  
4.3. The land uses for the Districts identified in the policies 4.2.1 to 4.2.10 have the following  
meanings:  
4
.3.1. Districts identified for Mixed-Use Residential land uses will include a broad range of  
uses in a compact urban form, that include residential uses, commercial uses, such  
as office, retail, service uses and hotels, media uses, Destination and/or Catalytic  
uses, local parks and open spaces, local and/or city-serving institutional uses, such  
as community centres, post-secondary schools, public schools regulated under the  
Education Act and child care centres, and essential city services, such as transit  
stations and/or stops. Vehicle dealerships, service shops, self-storage warehouses  
and drive-through establishments are not permitted.  
4
.3.2. Districts identified for Productions, Interactive and Creative (PIC) Core land uses  
will support the growth of key economic sectors and maintain Toronto as a place  
for creativity and innovation. Desirable and permitted uses consist of production  
studios, carpenter’s shops, workshops, artist and performing arts studios, and other  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
6
OLT-22-002109  
cultural-related and office uses associated with productions or creative sectors. Other  
permissible uses include light manufacturing, offices, warehouses (excluding self-  
storage warehousing), printing and binding, retail and service uses (excluding drive-  
through facilities), financial, laboratory, computer-related, education (excluding post-  
secondary schools, schools regulated under the Education Act and religious schools)  
uses, and other essential city services, such as transit stations and/or stops. Some  
entertainment uses may be permitted where the uses align with the vision for the  
particular District and in accordance with any performance standards established or  
size limitations. Accessory child care centres and post-secondary schools are  
permitted subject to addressing any District-specific land use compatibility policies,  
policy 4.4, and applicable policies in section 4.7 of this Area Specific Policy. PIC Core  
areas can accommodate larger floor plates and more intense PIC activities.  
4
.3.3. Districts identified for PIC Mixed-Use land uses permit the full range of desirable  
and permissible PIC Core uses in a compact urban form and multi-storied buildings.  
In addition, residential uses and other uses needed to directly support a complete  
community are permitted subject to achieving a minimum amount of floor area for PIC  
Core uses as identified in policies 4.2.2 f) and 4.2.3 c), policy 4.4, and addressing this  
Area Specific Policy’s land use compatibility policies. Other uses needed to support  
a complete community include local and/or city-serving institutional uses, such as  
community centres, public schools regulated under the Education Act and child care  
centres.  
4
.3.4. District identified for Light Industrial and Productions land uses permit PIC Core uses,  
except child care centres, and the full range of land uses within light industrial areas,  
excluding uses that are vehicle-oriented such as vehicle dealerships, service shops  
and drive-through establishments. Ancillary uses to Light Industrial and Productions  
uses, and essential city services, such as transit stations and/or stops are also  
permitted.  
4
.3.5. Lands identified for Port uses within Districts permit marine facilities that require  
dockwall access, and include, but are not limited to, marine terminals, silos and  
container terminals for the loading/unloading and storage, bulk or otherwise, of cargo  
by vessel, ferry or marine passenger terminals, ship building and repair, and ancillary  
uses to Port uses. Industrial uses that are directly dependent on marine shipping for  
the transportation of raw material or finished product are permitted subject to policy  
4.7.12 and include:  
a) Light and medium-intensity manufacturing uses;  
b) Asphalt plants, cement plants and concrete batching plants; and  
c) Outdoor bulk storage.  
4.3.6. Lands identified for Industrial land uses within Districts permit a range of light and  
medium-intensity industrial land uses and some heavy-intensity industrial land uses:  
a) Desired and permitted light and medium-intensity industrial uses include  
warehouses, public works yards, and light- and medium-intensity manufacturing  
uses.  
b) Permitted heavy-intensity industrial uses include asphalt plants, cement plants,  
concrete batching plants and relocated municipal waste transfer stations; and  
c) Ancillary uses to Port and Industrial uses are permitted.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
7
OLT-22-002109  
4
.3.7. Districts or sites identified for Destination and/or Catalytic land uses are uses that  
are intended to entertain, educate or elevate culture. Desired and permitted uses  
include arts, design and cultural-related uses, artisanal light-intensity manufacturing,  
entertainment places of assembly, parks and open spaces, community centres  
and recreational uses, media uses, post-secondary education uses, renewable energy,  
marine passenger terminals, other community uses and accessory retail and service  
uses. Other essential city services, such as transit stations and/or stops are also  
permitted. Residential uses are not permitted. Nightclubs and casinos are not  
Destination and/or Catalytic uses. This Area’s Specific Policy’s land use compatibility  
policies and policy 4.4 may need to be addressed prior to permitting sensitive uses.  
4
.4. Development consisting of PIC Core, Light Industrial and Productions, Port and Industrial  
land uses in advance of the implementation of the required flood remedial protection works  
may require the implementation of appropriate flood-proofing measures in accordance  
with the policies of the Lower Don Special Policy Area and to the satisfaction of the City  
in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Any flood- proofing  
measures may not preclude the implementation of the required flood remedial  
protection works in the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project  
Environmental Assessment (DMNP EA). Development consisting of new and/or intensified  
land uses provided for in the Mixed-Use Residential and PIC Mixed-Use land use typologies  
identified in policies 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 requires the implementation of the flood remedial  
protection works in the DMNP EA.  
4.5. In the interim period while the flood protection works are under construction, flood risk for  
specific developments will be determined by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority  
(
TRCA) based on floodplain mapping produced by the TRCA when identifying the limits of  
development for a proposed project.  
4
.6. PIC Core, Light Industrial and Productions, Port and Industrial Districts are areas for clusters  
of business and economic uses and are essential cornerstones for a diverse and thriving  
civic economy required for the foreseeable future. Conversion of these Districts or individual  
sites to non-employment uses will only be considered through a municipal comprehensive  
review or as may otherwise be set out in provincial legislation, plans and/or policies, and  
will require the preparation of a precinct plan. Temporary, major international events may be  
permitted subject to City Council’s direction and appropriate accommodation of existing  
operations.  
4.7. Land Use Compatibility  
4
.7.1. The Port Lands has a number of existing port and industrial uses, lands designated  
for future Port uses, and an energy generation facility. Land use compatibility issues  
associated with the introduction of sensitive uses in Villiers Island, Polson Quay/  
South River and the McCleary District have been identified. Land use compatibility  
issues have also been identified associated with the introduction of noise-sensitive  
institutional uses in the Media City, Turning Basin, Warehouse and Hearn Districts.  
Receptor mitigation may be insufficient to appropriately mitigate noise and air  
quality impacts. Prior to permitting sensitive uses in the Zoning By-law, a package  
of measures, such as separation distances, buffer uses, source mitigation and/or  
receptor mitigation, may be required. Mitigation is not required for spaces in noise  
sensitive uses that are not noise-sensitive, such as lobbies and administrative areas.  
4
.7.2. In order to address land use compatibility, there will be a need for a collaborative  
approach between development proponents introducing new sensitive uses, existing  
and planned major facilities in the Port Lands, and the City. Proponents of new  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
8
OLT-22-002109  
sensitive uses, and port, industrial and energy generation facility operators are  
encouraged to exchange relevant information, provide access to sites to complete more  
detailed assessment, and work together to achieve source mitigation measures, where  
practicable.  
4
.7.3. Where sensitive uses are expressly or conditionally-permitted by this Area Specific  
Policy and a development approval application is submitted for sensitive uses, the  
proponent of the sensitive use is responsible for:  
a) The cost of studies, inclusive of the cost of producing relevant information for the  
studies;  
b) Protecting confidentiality where port and industrial operations exchange relevant  
information for the purposes of completing more detailed studies;  
c) The cost of peer reviews of the studies by the City;  
d) Demonstrating compatibility;  
e) Implementing any required receptor mitigation measures; and  
f) The cost of mitigation measures, inclusive of any source mitigation required to  
introduce new sensitive uses. Any source mitigation will need to be practicable  
from a technical and reasonable operational perspective for port and industrial  
operations to implement. Where source mitigation is proposed and agreed to, the  
mitigation measures will be reflected in legally binding agreements between the  
proponents of the sensitive use(s) and impacted port and/or industrial operations.  
4.7.4. Development proponents will be encouraged to collaborate and share costs where  
source mitigation is used and benefits multiple development sites and/or Districts.  
4
.7.5. For the purposes of this Area Specific Policy, sensitive uses are defined as follows:  
a) A noise sensitive use means noise sensitive spaces within:  
i. a place of residence, such as a building with dwelling units, dwelling rooms or  
bed-sitting rooms except where a residence is located within the property of a  
stationary source;  
ii. any outdoor living area with a place of residence;  
iii. a noise sensitive commercial use, such as a hotel with rooms or suites; or  
iv. a noise sensitive institutional use, such as public schools, health care facilities  
or child care centres; and  
b) An air quality sensitive use means a place of residence including outdoor living  
areas, a child care facility, a health care facility, a senior citizen’s residence, a  
long-term care facility, or school including certain learning institutions such as  
universities and colleges.  
4
.7.6. Where sensitive uses are permitted, Detailed Noise and Air Quality Assessments  
will be required, and vibration and lighting studies may be required, in support of  
development approval requests for sensitive uses. Such assessments and studies  
will be prepared in accordance with any applicable Port Lands specific terms of  
references and are to specify how compatibility will be achieved and maintained  
between existing industrial uses, energy generation facilities, and existing and  
planned Port uses, and the proposed development to:  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
7
9
OLT-22-002109  
a) Minimize and mitigate adverse impacts to port, industrial and energy generation  
operations and protect their long-term operational and economic viability; and  
b) support the creation of high-quality living and working environments.  
1.1.1. The assessments and studies will detail measures to mitigate adverse effects. The  
City will have the assessments and studies peer reviewed.  
4.7.7. To support achieving compatibility, sensitive uses in proximity to existing industrial  
uses, energy generation facilities, and existing and planned Port uses may be:  
a) Limited by imposing restrictions to the location, heights, massing and/or siting of  
sensitive use developments and reflected in implementing Zoning By-laws;  
b) Required to be buffered by non-sensitive uses with buffer uses reflected in  
implementing Zoning By-laws; or  
c) Required to implement other source and/or receptor mitigation measures as  
appropriate.  
4
.7.8. Energy transformer stations in the Port Lands may have the potential to have adverse  
noise impacts on sensitive uses. Detailed Noise Assessments for sensitive uses  
introduced within 500 metres of an existing transformer station and any planned  
transformer stations will be undertaken in support of development applications for  
residential or other sensitive uses. Sensitive uses will be appropriately designed and  
buffered to minimize impacts, where required.  
4
.7.9. Noise limits that will be demonstrated in District-wide Comprehensive and Detailed  
Noise Assessments for steady and impulse sources, as well as shipping activity,  
associated with port, industrial, and energy generation and transformer stations will be  
in accordance with provincial regulations and guidelines, and the Port Lands specific  
Noise Assessment terms of reference.  
4.7.10.To support achieving compatibility between development proposals and operations/  
facilities, the City will:  
a) Circulate development applications submitted in the Port Lands to the Toronto  
Port Authority for their detailed technical review and comment in accordance with  
City practices; and  
b) Consult, as necessary, with the Toronto Port Authority, existing port and industrial  
operators, and public utilities during the development approval process for any  
new sensitive uses within geographic proximity and/or the area of influence of the  
operations to respective operations.  
4
.7.11.Where sensitive land uses are permitted, suitable warning clauses will be included, as  
required, in Offers of Purchase and Sale, lease/rental agreements and condominium  
declarations advising residents of:  
a) The proximity of film and television production studios, where sound levels  
associated with gunfire, explosions and/or other noisy activities occurring within  
studio compounds may at times be audible within the development;  
b) The proximity of the Billy Bishop Airport and potential impacts;  
c) The proximity of Port and Industrial uses, with associated heavy truck traffic;  
d) Moored ships which may obstruct views, and create noise and odour;  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
0
OLT-22-002109  
e) the proximity of energy generation facilities and transformer stations; and  
f) if the area is classified as Class 4 in accordance with NPC-300, an  
acknowledgment to that effect.  
The City will secure the requirement for the warning clauses in municipal agree-  
ment(s), such as Plan of Subdivision, Consent, Site Plan or Plan of Condominium,  
associated with development approvals as appropriate.  
4
.7.12.All new or expanded Industrial uses will be required to submit detailed noise and air  
quality reports, or other environmental reports as appropriate, at the development  
review stage and implement source mitigation measures to reduce and/or minimize  
impacts on future mixed-use areas.  
4
.7.13.Relocated and new Port uses should be designed, to the extent possible from a  
practical and reasonable operational perspective, to minimize impacts on Districts  
with residential and noise-sensitive commercial purpose and institutional buildings  
permissions.  
4.7.14.To minimize potential compatibility issues associated with laid-up shipping vessels,  
preferred zones for the berthing of shipping vessels are shown on Map 3G.  
4
.7.15.If there are District-specific land use compatibility policies in section 4.2 of this Area  
Specific Policy and there is a conflict between the District-specific and general  
compatibility policies in this section, the District-specific policies will prevail.  
4.8. Retail and Animation  
4.8.1. At-grade street-related retail and service uses will be required for buildings fronting on  
Priority Retail Streets and Frontages shown on Map 3C with exceptions for:  
a) Permitted publicly-accessible institutional uses, large-scale cultural uses, such as  
art galleries and museums, and radio and television broadcasting uses provided  
the uses on the ground floor are spaces that activate and animate the street  
frontage;  
b) Permitted small-scale cultural and entertainment uses;  
c) Small-scale breweries, distilleries and specialty food manufacturing uses  
associated with a retail store or eating establishment; and  
d) Lobbies and entrances for other permitted uses where a site and/or building only  
has frontage on a Priority Retail Street and Frontage.  
4
4
4
.8.2. Where an existing heritage building and/or structure is appropriately conserved and  
the existing building does not have its ground floor flush with existing or future grades,  
the requirement in Policy 4.8.1 may be satisfied on the first floor of the heritage  
building and/or structure.  
.8.3. At-grade street-related retail and services uses will be protected for and encouraged  
on Secondary Retail Streets and water’s edge animation areas shown on Map 3C  
by requiring approximately five (5) metre at grade floor to ceiling heights for new  
buildings.  
.8.4. Large-scale retail stores in stand-alone buildings or in a power centre format are  
2
not permitted. Large-scale retail stores exceeding a gross floor area of 3,500 m in a  
building with a mix of other uses may be permitted through the enactment of a zoning  
by-law amendment in Villiers Island, McCleary District, Polson Quay or South River  
subject to:  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
1
OLT-22-002109  
a) a fine-grain pattern of fully-functional small-scale retail stores and/or services  
uses at street level being established along Priority and Secondary Retail Streets  
to maintain continuity and consistency of retail streets and support a vibrant retail  
environment;  
b) the floor area of the large-scale retail store will be distributed on multiple floors,  
wholly located above the ground floor, or wrapped with fully-functioning small-  
scale retail stores on Priority and Secondary Retail Streets;  
c) the large-scale retail use would not preclude achieving a grocery store in each  
new community to enable people to walk or cycle for daily necessities;  
d) the large-scale retail use would not adversely impact the planned function of the  
Priority and Secondary Retail Streets and Frontages demonstrated through the  
submission of a retail and market study, as may be required by the City, as part of  
a complete application that may be peer reviewed at the expense of the applicant;  
e) the large-scale retail use does not require substantial parking and would support  
a vibrant active transportation environment; and  
f) the large-scale retail use(s) does not consist of a shopping centre or mall which  
means a group of retail stores wholly enclosed within a building or structure with  
common entry points, interior common walkways and a combined leasable floor  
2
area exceeding 20,000 m .  
4
.8.5. Large-scale retail (stand-alone, in mixed-use buildings or in a power centre format  
2
and exceeding 3,500 m of gross floor area) is not permitted in PIC Core and Light  
Industrial and Production Districts.  
2
4
.8.6. A large-scale retail store exceeding a gross floor area of 3,500 m in the Hearn may  
be permitted through the enactment of a zoning by-law amendment subject to:  
a) A range of small- and medium-scale retail stores also being provided in an indoor  
market format;  
b) the large-scale retail use would not adversely impact the planned function of the  
Priority and Secondary Retail Streets and Frontages demonstrated through the  
submission of a retail and market study, as may be required by the City, as part of  
a complete application that may be peer reviewed at the expense of the applicant;  
and  
c) the large-scale retail use does not require substantial parking and would support  
a vibrant active transportation environment.  
5
.
Parks and Open Spaces  
5
.1. The parks and open system for the Port Lands will beautify the Port Lands landscape,  
provide year round passive and active recreational opportunities, and contribute to  
enhancing the environment and natural heritage in the Port Lands.  
5.2. The design of parks and open spaces will:  
5.2.1. Incorporate and appropriately conserve any cultural heritage resources and their  
associated values and attributes to the satisfaction of the City;  
5
.2.2. Incorporate, where appropriate, areas for native, naturalized tree and understorey  
plantings to support the biodiversity objectives of this Area Specific Policy, and  
particularly within major parks and open spaces;  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
2
OLT-22-002109  
5.2.3. Include other amenities and features to support high-quality living and working  
environments; and  
5
.2.4. Consider the local context in the design of parks and open spaces. In particular, parks  
and open spaces adjacent or within close to proximity to Environmental Significant  
Areas or Natural Heritage features will be sensitively designed to minimize any  
negative impacts to these areas and features or their ecological functions.  
5.3. The major public parkland and other open spaces identified for the Port Lands consists of:  
5
.3.1. River Park (north and south) and Promontory Park which will be key signature  
public parks. They will include a wide variety of park programming and amenities,  
including paths, planted woodlands, a water’s edge promenade, upland prospects,  
playgrounds, as well as opportunities for active recreation such as multi-purpose  
courts and fields.  
5
.3.2. Silo Square and the Keating Channel promenade as an integrated, central major  
park for Villiers Island and the Keating Channel Precinct to the north. Silo Square  
will consist of an urban square that will feature the adaptive reuse of the existing  
historic silos and a potential Destination and/or Catalytic use or a low-carbon energy  
generation facility sensitively designed to conserve the silo’s industrial legacy. The  
Keating Channel promenade, which will extend from New Cherry to the river in the  
east, will be a generous and varied civic promenade adjacent to the Channel lined  
with waterside cafes, restaurants and small retail stores.  
5
.3.3. McCleary Park will be expanded and reconfigured subject to the relocation of  
the existing waste transfer station. Any reconfiguration of the existing park will be  
determined through Phase 3 and 4 of Class EA process for the Broadview extension,  
and will ensure no net loss of park space and achieve a net overall increase in park  
size. McCleary park will continue to be utilized for active recreational uses and be  
designed to continue to accommodate regulation-sized sports fields.  
5
.3.4. An apron of generous parkland and publicly-accessible open space will be provided  
adjacent to the west and south facades of the Hearn Generating Station building and  
any associated adaptive reuse of this building. The parkland and open spaces will  
provide, but not be limited to the following:  
a) Public event gathering space;  
b) Space for naturalized plantings, particularly adjacent to Unwin Avenue; and  
c) Other features, such as passive green lawns and/or seating areas.  
A flexible and adaptable open space adjacent to the east façade of the Hearn Gener-  
ating Station building should also be provided to provide additional event space and  
programmable open space, while also supporting parking. The size and programming  
of the parkland and publicly-accessible open space will be determined at the precinct  
planning stage.  
5
.3.5. The Turning Basin Square will provide space for gatherings, special events and a  
passive green space. Stormwater management facilities may be permitted (e.g.  
pumping stations or treatment facilities) to be located within the Turning Basin Square  
subject to being designed to have a minimal footprint and ensure high-quality finishes  
and landscaping are incorporated to enhance the beauty and utility of the space.  
Any new or reconfigured below-grade infrastructure will enable landscaping and tree  
planting within the park and be designed as an integrated facility; and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
3
OLT-22-002109  
5
.3.6. The Leslie Green Portal will be a wide, green spine on the east and west sides  
of Leslie Street and will act as a major pedestrian and cycling gateway to Tommy  
Thompson Park with different conditions:  
a) On the west side of Leslie Street between Commissioners Street and the Leslie  
Slip Outlook, a generous landscape setback adjacent to Leslie Street that will  
be designed to complement the public realm of Leslie Street and should be  
approximately 8 metres in width. The width of park on the east side of Leslie  
Street between Commissioners Street and the Leslie Slip Outlook will be a  
minimum of 50 metres wide;  
b) Between the Leslie Slip Lookout and Unwin Avenue, the width of the park on  
the west side of Leslie Street will be a minimum of 50 metres. The width of the  
existing park on the east side of Leslie Street will be maintained at least at its  
current width; and  
c) Permitted uses will include agricultural uses subject to meeting environmental  
and regulatory requirements, park and recreational uses, and cogeneration  
energy uses associated with the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant and provided  
the use is not within a wholly enclosed building and the design complements  
the Portal. Where rail access into the Port Lands is required to be maintained,  
the rail sidings will be integrated with the park design. A small retail store and/  
or restaurant use may be considered on the west side of Leslie Street subject to  
demonstrating that the use will complement the overall park function and design.  
5.3.7. The Leslie Slip Lookout west will provide a naturalized plaza and lookout down the  
Ship Channel at the terminus of the Leslie Street Slip; and  
5
.3.8. The Cherry Lookout which will be a public park space on either side of Cherry Street  
on the south side of the Ship Channel will have a minimum depth of 30 metres and be  
designed to accommodate public uses.  
5.4. Public Promenades identified on Map C will be destination open spaces for active, year-  
round use. The Public Promenades will have varied conditions, consisting of:  
5
.4.1. Promenades that will act as broad terraces for a range of activities such as, but not  
limited to, outdoor dining, strolling, festivals and special events. The promenades will  
be no less than 18 metres wide with landscaping, seating and multi-use pathways,  
and where required, provide safety measures and maintenance access associated  
with hydro infrastructure in the vicinity of the promenade. The need for a wider  
promenade would be determined during precinct planning; and  
5
.4.2. Promenades that will integrate with streets in the overall design and be lined with  
buildings with active uses at grade. The combined promenade and public street width  
will be no less than 28 metres and depending on the role and function of the public  
street. Open space amenities adjacent to the dockwall within these promenades will  
be no less than 15 metres wide associated with the Carlaw Avenue extension and 12  
metres wide for promenades with local or shared streets.  
5
.5. The Hearn District Promenade will have a different character to promenades on the north  
side of the Ship Channel, and will be designed to integrate the existing heritage buildings  
and make allowances for hydro transmission towers and related infrastructure. Further  
study, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, is required to determine the ultimate  
width(s) of the promenade which may be less than 18 metres. The study will also explore  
opportunities enabling safe public access between the dockwall and the northern boundary  
of the Hearn Switching Station while ensuring continued access for the maintenance and  
safety of hydro infrastructure.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
4
OLT-22-002109  
5
.6. Future Water’s Edge Promenades are lands adjacent to waterways that will continue to  
have Port uses for the foreseeable future. These areas will be protected for water’s edge  
promenades. New buildings or structures will generally not be permitted within 18 metres of  
the dockwall. In the event that a non-Port use is proposed adjacent to the dockwall, a water’s  
edge promenade in accordance with Policy 5.3 will be secured.  
5.7. A local park will be provided within each of the Mixed-Use Residential and PIC Mixed Use  
districts. The local public parkland will be:  
5
.7.1. Configured to accommodate a range of locally-oriented active and passive  
opportunities; Located so as to serve as a central neighbourhood landmark or located  
to enable an expansion of a major park or open space or Public Promenade adjacent  
to the naturalized river or Inner Harbour; and  
5.7.2. Designed and programmed for neighbourhood use and to enable community  
gatherings and socializing.  
5
.8. The precise size and configuration of the local parkland within each district will be  
2
determined during precinct planning, but will be no less than 7,500 m in area and configured  
to enable a range of local parkland opportunities such as playgrounds, passive lawns,  
seating areas, mid-sized multi-use play fields and local active amenity.  
5
.9. Local parkland and publicly-accessible, privately-owned open spaces will also be pursued  
in the PIC Core and Light Industrial and Productions Districts to provide amenity for area  
workers.  
5.10. Development will be set back by a minimum of 10 metres from the stable top of bank of  
the naturalized mouth of the Don River and Don Greenway north of the Ship Channel.  
5
.11. In addition to the lakefilling considerations identified in Policy 28 of the Central  
Waterfront Secondary Plan, lakefilling is permitted in the area shown on Map C in  
recognition of the new high-quality aquatic and natural habitat and open spaces that  
will be created associated with the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood  
Protection Project Environmental Assessment.  
5.12. On land that is municipally owned, including land owned by Waterfront Toronto, as of the  
date of adoption of this Area Specific Policy:  
5
.12.1. Parkland dedication for residential uses will be provided by way of the dedication  
of land, determined and dedicated on a district wide basis. Cash-in-lieu will not be  
accepted. Lands dedicated for parkland will be utilized to support the establishment of  
local parks in each district; and  
5
.12.2. Irrespective of the size of a net development site, the parkland provision rate for  
residential development and the residential portion of mixed use development will not  
be less than 20 per cent of the area of the development site. The dedication of land  
may occur off-site within the district which the development site is located and as  
determined through precinct planning to create functional and suitably-sized local  
public parks for the district.  
5.12.3. Major parks and open spaces and Public Promenades, as shown on Map C, will:  
a) Be excluded from net development sites for the purposes of calculating parkland  
dedication rates; and  
b) Not be counted towards satisfying the 20 per cent requirements for parkland  
dedication.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
5
OLT-22-002109  
5.13. On privately-owned land as of the date of adoption of this Area Specific Policy:  
5
.13.1. Parkland dedication will be utilized to support the delivery of local public parkland as a  
priority. An alternative parkland dedication will be applied to proposals for residential  
and for the residential portion of mixed-use development as follows:  
a) 15 per cent of the net site area, net of any streets (public or private), for proposals  
with a residential component that is less than a net FSI of 4.0;  
b) 30 per cent of the site area, net of any streets (public or private), for proposals  
with a residential component that is equal to or exceeds a net FSI of 4.0;  
c) 50 per cent of the site area, net of any streets (public or private), for proposals  
with a residential component that is equal to or exceeds a net FSI of 8.0.  
5.13.2. Cash-in-lieu may be accepted at the sole discretion of the City and will only be applied  
towards the acquisition, design and construction of public parks within the Port Lands.  
6
.
Cultural Heritage  
6
.1. Heritage resources will be appropriately conserved as vital to the cultural heritage landscape  
of the Port Lands, Toronto waterfront and symbols of the waterfront’s industrial heritage in  
accordance with the City of Toronto Official Plan heritage policies and the policies in this  
Section 6.0:  
6
.1.1. Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained consistent with  
the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, as  
revised from time to time and as adopted by Council; and  
6
.1.2. When a City-owned property on the Heritage Register is sold, leased or transferred  
to another owner, it will be designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. A Heritage  
Easement Agreement will be secured and monitored, and public access maintained to  
its heritage attributes, where feasible.  
6
.2. Buildings, structures and/or landscapes with cultural heritage value or interest are identified  
on Map 3D and 3E and will be appropriately conserved and celebrated as important features  
of the Port Lands. This will include, but not be limited to:  
6
.2.1. Evaluating the cultural heritage values, attributes and character of a site, resource  
or landscape not currently listed on the City’s Heritage Register or designated under  
the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with relevant legislation and City policies and  
practices to establish the values and attributes of the resources and, if appropriate,  
conserving the site and/or resource;  
6
.2.2. Ensuring transitions of new development adjacent to or in proximity to a heritage  
resource in order to protect and mitigate negative impacts to heritage properties and/  
or corridors and to reinforce and distinguish the historic character, setting and scale of  
the resources, which will be achieved through appropriate setbacks, stepbacks and/or  
heights of new buildings;  
6
.2.3. Where it is supported by the cultural heritage values and attributes of a property on  
the Heritage Register and/or identified on Map 3D, conserving whole or substantial  
portions of buildings, structures and landscapes on those properties is desirable and  
encouraged. The retention of facades alone is discouraged;  
6
.2.4. Reinforcing views and viewsheds of heritage resources and their attributes that  
includes, among others, the silos and chimney stacks as prominent landmarks, and  
reinforcing termini of long views along key public streets and/or public parks and open  
spaces, all through the thoughtful placement, orientation and control of buildings and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
6
OLT-22-002109  
building heights, subject to the completion of view studies, to the satisfaction of the  
City and the land owner.  
6
.2.5. Completing view studies during precinct planning and the development application  
review process to demonstrate how the proposed siting and scale of proposed  
buildings:  
a) Maintain views as specified on Map 3F and in Appendix 1 to important heritage  
resources from the public realm;  
b) Enable important heritage resources to be visually prominent elements within the  
overall skyline of the Port Lands as viewed from the promenade of the Central  
Waterfront between Yonge Street and Sherbourne Common; and  
c) Ensure the existing scale, character and attributes of the heritage resources  
and landmarks are not negatively impacted by development within the identified  
views.  
6.2.6. Giving silos, chimney stacks and other heritage resources address or frontage on/in  
major public open spaces and streets; and  
6.2.7. Ensuring that the low-rise character along Old Cherry Street is respected and  
complemented by requiring any proposed new development above 3 storeys  
(
approximately 12 metres) that fronts onto the east side of the existing Cherry Street  
to be stepped back a minimum of 14 metres from the Old Cherry Street property line.  
6
.2.8. Ensuring that the character of the Keating Channel Public Promenade in Villiers  
Island is respected and complemented by maintaining the low-rise character in any  
proposed development lining the Keating Channel Public Promenade.  
6
.2.9. None of the policies of this Section 6.2 is intended to impede the ongoing operation,  
maintenance, repair or replacement of any existing operational electricity transmission  
and distribution infrastructure.  
6
.3. Prior to detailed design of the River and Promontory Park for the Marine Terminal 35 site,  
an assessment of the heritage values and attributes of the site consistent with provincial  
regulations and City practices will be undertaken by the City, or to the City’s satisfaction, to  
inform an appropriate commemoration strategy.  
6
.4. Heritage Impact Assessments will be required prior to alteration of heritage buildings,  
structures and/or landscapes identified on Map 3D and 3E. The Heritage Impact Assessment  
will be undertaken and completed to the satisfaction of the City.  
6
.5. Heritage buildings and/or structures should be conserved in their original location, including  
minimization of any grade changes needed to flood protect lands. A heritage building and/  
or structure may be relocated, where technically possible, to accommodate a major public  
work project, such as the naturalization of the mouth of the Don River or widening major  
public streets to accommodate transit in dedicated rights-of-way, subject to a completed  
Environmental Assessment process and securing appropriate conditions in a Heritage  
Easement Agreement prior to relocation.  
6.6. The 2008 Waterfront Toronto Archaeological Conservation and Management Strategy  
(
ACMS) will serve as the basis for future planning decisions with respect to the  
archaeological assessment process, including:  
6.6.1. Documentation during construction monitoring for identified Grade 2 resources in the  
ACMS; and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
7
OLT-22-002109  
6
.6.2. Interpretation and commemoration of all archaeological resources identified, and in  
consultation with any First Nations/Aboriginal community that may be interested in  
identifying opportunities to commemorate the historical relationship that First Nations/  
Aboriginal communities have with the waterfront and the Port Lands.  
6
.7. In the event that First Nations/Aboriginal archaeological sites are encountered, consultation  
with First Nations/Aboriginal communities will take place during the archaeological  
assessment process when site parameters and significance are determined.  
7
.
Community Infrastructure  
7
.1. New community infrastructure will be developed in the Port Lands in a timely and  
coordinated manner to achieve the amount and range of community infrastructure necessary  
to serve future growth and support some city-wide needs. Community infrastructure refers  
to public spaces and buildings that accommodate a range of services and facilities, such as  
educational, indoor recreational, cultural and health-related services, to support people in  
meeting their social needs and enhance their well-being and quality of life.  
7.2. The following principles will guide the provision of community infrastructure in the Port  
Lands:  
7
.2.1. Recognizing that community infrastructure in the Port Lands needs to meet both local  
and some city-wide needs. It can also serve as emergency reception centres during  
emergencies;  
7.2.2. Conveniently locating locally-oriented community infrastructure to promote walkability  
and create hubs of activity;  
7
.2.3. Geographically distributing community infrastructure across new communities,  
but also locating some suitable community infrastructure in identified areas of  
employment to promote animation and activity;  
7
7
7
.2.4. Providing locally-oriented community infrastructure to coincide with new development  
and ensuring the infrastructure is designed to be multi-functional;  
.2.5. Siting community infrastructure to front on public streets and ensuring good visibility  
and access;  
.2.6. Locating and designing community infrastructure to ensure compatibility with future  
neighbourhoods. Community infrastructure with a more regional draw and substantial  
vehicular parking requirements should be located in non-residential areas;  
7
7
7
.2.7. Ensuring that community infrastructure will have a compact urban form, be integrated  
in mixed-use buildings and/or utilize innovative delivery models, where appropriate;  
.2.8. Encouraging community infrastructure to provide high quality design and/or leverage  
unique resources to contribute to placemaking in the Port Lands; and  
.2.9. Recognizing the high-costs required to redevelop the Port Lands and consideration  
of future operational costs of service providers by ensuring efficient and cost-effective  
delivery of community infrastructure.  
7
.3. Innovative approaches for providing the required community infrastructure will be explored,  
including shared use of schools, vertical integration of community infrastructure in mixed-use  
buildings, and/or the co-location of multiple services and facilities to create a community hub.  
7.4. Local school boards will maximize outdoor play space on school property to ensure students  
and staff have dedicated access to open space that is designed for their needs.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
8
OLT-22-002109  
7
.5. The City and local school boards may cooperate where appropriate, to secure shared use  
of public parks and school facilities and outdoor spaces, in order to pursue their greater  
utilization for community access and recreational pursuits.  
7.6. The community infrastructure priorities and approximate facility size, based on population  
and employment estimates, for the Port Lands are as follows:  
7.6.1. Villiers Island:  
2
a) One (1) small 3,250 m Community Recreation Centre containing an indoor pool  
and multi-purpose space;  
b) A minimum of two (2) licensed non-profit child care facilities with a minimum of  
124 total spaces provided;  
2
c) One 1,850 m centre for human services space; and  
d) One (1) public (TDSB) elementary school, with the appropriate site size, location,  
shape and frontage to be determined through the precinct planning process.  
7.6.2. McCleary District:  
2
a) One (1) large 4,650m Community Recreation Centre with multipurpose space  
and a double gymnasium that will both serve the McCleary District and entire Port  
Lands area;  
2
b) One (1) 1,850 m centre for human services space;  
c) One (1) public (TDSB) elementary school, with the appropriate site size, location,  
shape and frontage to be determined through the precinct planning process; and  
d) Two (2) licensed non-profit child care facilities with a minimum of 62 spaces each;  
.6.3. Emergency Services:  
7
a) One (1) Fire Station integrated into a mixed-use development in either Villiers  
Island or the McCleary District; and  
b) One (1) Emergency Medical Services building, with an urban character and  
entrance fronting onto a public street, in the Warehouse District or East Port area.  
7.6.4. Other city-wide community infrastructure priorities for the Port Lands include:  
a) Cultural facilities in Villiers Island, and as part of the adaptive re-use of the Hearn  
and Commissioners Waste Transfer building; and  
b) A twin-pad arena and/or sports complex in a compact, urban form consisting of a  
multi-storeyed building and limited surface parking at grade located either in the  
Warehouse District, the Hearn or south of Unwin Avenue to the west of the Cherry  
Beach Sports Fields.  
7.6.5. Other facilities that will be encouraged as either transitional or permanent community  
infrastructure include:  
a) A discovery centre to showcase and educate residents, employees and visitors  
on the naturalized river valley and other natural features in the Port Lands;  
b) A destination or cultural facility as part of the Polson Point and Turning Basin  
Plazas identified as Inner Harbour Special Places on Map E;  
c) Institutional and post-secondary uses; and  
d) Public boat clubs and launches.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
8
9
OLT-22-002109  
7
.6.6. Where residential uses are permitted in the Polson Quay and South River Districts, a  
full range of community infrastructure will be required. Priorities and the approximate  
size of facilities are:  
a) One (1) public (TDSB) elementary school, with the appropriate site size, location,  
shape and frontage to be determined through the precinct planning process;  
b) One (1) public (TCDSB) elementary school;  
2
c) One (1) 1,850 m centre for human services space;  
2
d) One (1) 1,595 m public library with multi-purpose space; and  
e) Two (2) licensed non-profit child care facilities (one in Polson Quay and one in  
South River) with a minimum of 62 spaces each.  
7
.7. Secondary school programming may be required in the Port Lands to support one or more of  
the mixed-use communities. The secondary school programming is permitted to be located  
in a mixed-use building, community hub or associated with an elementary school. Access to  
City-owned and operated sports fields may be considered through appropriate agreement  
with the City.  
7
.8. The specific type of community infrastructure may be refined and/or revised at precinct  
planning or through a city-wide review of recreational facilities without the need to amend  
this Area Specific Policy and at the discretion of the City. Refinements to the community  
infrastructure priorities during precinct planning will be based on, but not limited to, the  
following:  
7.8.1. the actual land uses and densities proposed, or that has been developed, in each  
district;  
7
.8.2. the identification of any changes in need and demand; and  
.8.3. consultation with service providers and the public.  
7
7.9. Revision of a priority public school in Policy 7.6 or 7.7 will only occur if supported by the  
applicable public school board.  
8
.
Inclusive Communities  
8
.1. New mixed-use communities in the Port Lands will be complete, inclusive communities  
that accommodate a range of housing opportunities in terms of type, size, tenure and  
affordability.  
8.2. Housing will be provided that accommodates larger households, families, seniors, students,  
and people with low and moderate incomes and other special needs.  
8.3. Residential developments will provide:  
8
.3.1. 10 per cent of the total residential units as three-bedrooms or larger; and,  
.3.2. 15 percent of the total residential units built as two-bedroom units or larger.  
8
8.4. New residential developments will provide affordable rental housing at the pace of and  
proportional to market developments.  
8
.5. On land that is publicly owned, as of the date of adoption of this Area Specific Policy and in  
Mixed Use Residential and PIC Mixed-Use areas where residential uses are permitted, land  
sufficient to accommodate 20 per cent of the residential gross floor areas will be set aside for  
affordable rental housing. The land will be to the City’s satisfaction and ready and available  
for development. Land can consist of a site identified specifically for an affordable housing  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
0
OLT-22-002109  
project, or a strata arrangement in a mixed-use development. Funding to construct the  
affordable rental housing on said land will be proactively pursued to ensure that affordable rental  
housing is developed concurrently with market development.  
8
.6. Additional effort will be made on publicly-owned land to ensure that the affordable rental  
housing in the Port Lands will also include supportive and special needs housing, and rent  
geared to income housing to accommodate households of lower incomes. Additional effort  
will also be made to provide other housing models, such as mid-range purpose-built rental  
housing, over and above the minimum requirements established in policy 8.5.  
8
.7. On land that is privately owned, as of the date of adoption of this Area Specific Policy, and  
in Mixed Use Residential and PIC Mixed-Use areas where residential uses are permitted,  
affordable rental housing will be provided in the form of one of the following methods or a  
combination thereof:  
8.7.1. Affordable rental units:  
a) 5 per cent of the total residential gross floor area constructed and conveyed to the  
City as permanent affordable housing; and/or  
b) 10 per cent of the total residential gross floor area for a minimum period of 25  
years; and/or  
8.7.2. 20 per cent of the total residential gross floor area as land, ready and available for  
development, and dedicated to the City for development of affordable rental housing.  
8
.8. On land that is privately owned, as of the date of the adoption of this Area Specific Policy,  
cash-in-lieu, calculated as the cost to construct and maintain affordable rental housing, may  
only be used to supplement the other methods identified in policy 8.7.  
8
.9. The acceptance of 8.7.1 a), 8.7.2, or 8.8 will be at the City’s sole discretion. A combination  
of the above may be considered to satisfy the overall affordable rental housing requirement  
in which case the overall percentage would be pro-rated depending on the proposed  
combination of delivery options. The majority of the affordable rental housing will consist of  
units or land.  
8.10.The City will explore opportunities with private landowners and encourage the provision of  
affordable ownership housing and mid-range affordable rental housing.  
8
.11.A Housing Issues Report, as well as plans and drawings for affordable rental housing  
proposed to be delivered as units or land, will be required for a complete development  
application, as well as for the lifting of any holding provisions. The report will provide  
information on the affordable housing and other housing policy matters in the context of the  
residential developments on the lands.  
8.12.High-quality living environments will be created to support physical and mental health and  
active living that includes:  
8
8
8
.12.1.Indoor and outdoor amenity spaces suitable for a range of unit types, including  
amenity suitable for families and pet owners;  
.12.2.Storage spaces both within units and common areas that are convenient, secure and  
fully accessible; and  
.12.3.Bedrooms with closets and access to natural light and, where appropriate,  
windows, and preferably operable windows where this can be accommodated.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
1
OLT-22-002109  
9. Movement and Access  
9
.1. The following complete street principles will inform the design of public streets in the Port  
Lands, recognizing that different streets will have different purposes, constraints and  
character. The overall objective is to create a well-functioning public street network that is  
designed to provide a vibrant public realm, safe access and efficient operation for all street  
activities. The design of private streets, where they are permitted to support the operation of  
studio complexes, will ensure the width of the private streets will enable achievement of the  
complete street principles in recognition that private streets may become public streets over  
time:  
9
9
9
.1.1. Transit will be prioritized, where appropriate, with an emphasis on dedicated transit  
right-of-ways on key major streets as shown on Map B;  
.1.2. Lane widths will be minimized in consideration of the role and function of an individual  
street to assist in making streets safer and more pedestrian friendly;  
.1.3. Raised, physically separated cycle tracks and multi-use pathways will be prioritized  
on key major streets identified on Map D to create a well-connected, robust and safe  
cycling network. Raised, separated cycle tracks will be encouraged on all other major  
streets;  
9
.1.4. Wide sidewalks with unobstructed, accessible pedestrian clearways will be provided  
to encourage walking and contribute to the overall public realm vibrancy of the Port  
Lands;  
9
.1.5. Goods movement will be ensured to provide for the continued economic vitality  
of industry. Critical goods movement corridors will be identified and designed with  
suitable conditions for truck access balanced with other complete street objectives;  
9.1.6. Stormwater and green infrastructure will be integrated in street design to improve air  
quality, provide habitat corridors and add visual interest;  
9
.1.7. Permeable surfaces for roadways and sidewalks will be encouraged and pursued,  
where possible, to reduce flooding, preserve capacity in storm drains and sewers and  
add visual interest;  
9.1.8. Street trees and understorey plantings will be provided on all streets with adequate  
room to grow and suitable soil conditions/techniques;  
9
.1.9. Pedestrian and cycling amenities will be provided on all streets, including, but not  
limited to, bike parking infrastructure, street furniture, pedestrian scaled lighting,  
weather protection, waste management infrastructure and public art;  
9
.1.10.Place-making features, such as, but not limited to, public art, cultural heritage  
landscapes and sustainability features, will be incorporated in street design to  
contribute to the character of the area; and  
9
.1.11.Consideration will be given to the placement, operation and maintenance of existing  
and planned municipal services and utilities, together with electricity transmission and  
distribution infrastructure.  
9
.2. New and/or improved segments of the public street network as identified on Map A will be  
provided to support development and maintain the functional integrity of the transportation  
system.  
9.3. The section of the east-west street north of Commissioners Street that extends through  
the extended McCleary Park will be further reviewed during precinct planning and/or  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
2
OLT-22-002109  
during Phases 3 and 4 of the Municipal Class EA process. The design of the street will be  
integrated into the overall design of the park and prioritize pedestrians.  
9
.4. The east-west street south of Commissioners Street between the Don Roadway and Carlaw  
Avenue is needed to provide east-west capacity and connectivity to support intensification  
and redevelopment in Media City and the Turning Basin District. Phases 3 and 4 of the  
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process will review alternative alignments and  
designs for this street in association with the Broadview extension south of Commissioners  
Street, including alternatives that enable the Basin Transformer Station to remain in its  
present location. The alignment, as currently depicted on Map A and its planned right-of-way  
width, will be protected for as part of development approvals while Phases 3 and 4 of the  
Environmental Assessment process are completed.  
9
.5. The reconstruction of streets and expansion of the transportation network in the Port  
Lands will be realized over time as part of the revitalization efforts, as Districts redevelop  
and intensify, or as needed to support other required infrastructure upgrades. Some  
transportation network improvements may be required for new intensified uses. If a required  
transportation network improvement is not in place at the time of a development application,  
development proponents may need to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the  
transportation network will function appropriately until the required improvements are able to  
be implemented.  
9
.6. A potential future extension of the Don Roadway across the Ship Channel to Unwin Avenue  
will be protected for. Buildings and/or permanent structures will not be permitted to located  
where the public street would be located.  
9
.7. A fine grain of local public streets will be required in Mixed-use Residential areas to provide  
address, access and amenity for development. In PIC Mixed-Use areas, development will  
be located and sited to enable the long-term objective of achieving a fine-grained network  
of local public streets. In other districts, a network of local public streets will be secured as  
appropriate, and in consideration of land use.  
9
.8. The location, alignment and design of local public streets and any private streets associated  
with studio complexes within a particular District will be determined at the precinct planning  
stage or during development review where precinct planning does not apply. Considerations  
for the location and alignment of local public streets and private streets will include:  
9
9
9
.8.1. alignment with streets in other districts to enhance visual connections and facilitate  
future physical connections between districts;  
.8.2. reinforcement of visual connections between the city and the water, and to provide  
visual connections of important natural or human-made features; and  
.8.3. avoidance of block lengths greater than 150m. Where a block exceeds a length of 150  
metres, development will be sited and configured to enable permeability and porosity  
through the block.  
9
.9. Shared local public streets are specially designed streets where pedestrians, cyclists and  
motorists share the street. They will be provided in key locations and identified during  
precinct planning.  
9
.10.Laneways will be provided as appropriate for loading and servicing access for buildings,  
and to serve as secondary pedestrian and cycling routes. Locations for laneways will be  
determined during precinct planning or during development review. They will be well lit and  
will be designed to accommodate both vehicles and pedestrians/cyclists.  
9.11.The use of permeable materials and the design of shared streets and laneways will ensure  
a balance between the objective of providing high-quality, pedestrian-friendly, sustainable  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
3
OLT-22-002109  
streets and operational and maintenance considerations.  
9
.12.Streets will be public streets, and owned and maintained by the City. Land conveyed to  
the City for public streets will be free and clear, above and below grade, of all physical  
obstructions and easements, encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and  
subsurface easements.  
9.13.Transit  
9.13.1.Cherry Street (New), Commissioners Street and Broadview Avenue will have  
dedicated public transit right-of-ways.  
9
.13.2.The precise location of a dedicated transit right-of-way within the streets will be  
determined through the completion of the Environmental Assessment process and  
identification of a preferred design.  
9
.13.3.The expansion of bus service within portions of the Port Lands will be encouraged  
to provide enhanced transit access for employment uses, future destinations and  
recreational amenity.  
9
.13.4.Transit hubs will be provided where transit routes converge. These hubs will have  
a pedestrian friendly design and will be integrated with streetscaping and/or plaza  
design.  
9.14.  
Pedestrians and Cyclists  
9
.14.1.A well-connected network of on- and off-street cycling routes will be provided for in  
accordance with Map D. The location and design of these routes and facilities may be  
further refined at the precinct planning stage or detailed design without amendment to this  
Area Specific Policy.  
9.14.2. Publicly accessible mid-block connections will supplement the network of streets in  
the Port Lands. Mid-block connections will:  
a) be positioned to form a comprehensive network of linkages with the system of  
streets;  
b) complete pedestrian and cycling linkages;  
c) be conceived as part of an overall parks and open space system;  
d) be wide enough to accommodate the installation of street furniture, lighting and  
identity features that reinforce the character of the particular district; and  
e) have activated building frontages along the edges for informal surveillance.  
9.14.3.Additional pedestrian and cycling bridges across the Don Greenway and the Keating  
Channel will be protected for as shown on Map D with further assessment to be  
undertaken to ensure no impacts to flood conveyance or high-quality wetlands.  
Goods Movement  
9.15.  
9
.15.1.Providing for goods movement in and through the area is required, while ensuring that  
potential conflicts associated with the mix of Port and Industrial uses and new mixed-  
use communities are minimized. Dedicated truck routes that enable convenient and  
reliable routes for the movement of goods in and through the area will be determined  
as part of a Port Lands Wide Truck Management Strategy to be completed in  
consultation with the Toronto Port Authority, industrial operators and port users.  
9.15.2.In PIC, Light Industrial and Productions, Port and Industrial areas, the design of  
streets will serve the needs and access requirements and the staging of trucks  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
4
OLT-22-002109  
balanced with maintaining a safe pedestrian environment and minimizing rights-of-  
way widths and corner radii.  
9.16.  
Parking and loading  
9
.16.1.Parking policies and standards developed at precinct planning, through a  
comprehensive zoning review, or during development review where appropriate, will  
improve the quality of districts, and strive to reduce congestion and private vehicle  
trips by encouraging travel by non-auto modes.  
9
.16.2.Maximum parking standards are to be developed and introduced for all uses permitted  
in the Port Lands. Minimum parking standards, if provided, will support achievement  
of shifts to transit and active transportation as the primary means of moving in and  
through the area.  
9.16.3.Parking arrangements that make efficient use of space will be encouraged and  
pursued in all developments, particularly where cars will not be used on a daily basis.  
9.16.4.On-street parking will be managed to:  
a) more efficiently use street parking space and increase turnover and parking  
availability supporting access to parks and open spaces;  
b) provide an adequate amount of short-term, on-street curbside freight loading  
spaces; and  
c) accommodate goods movement, where appropriate, and the staging of  
production vehicles, particularly in PIC and Light Industrial and Productions  
districts; and  
d) ensure that the movement of trucks can be made safely and efficiently at, or near,  
intersections or when maneuvering in or out of driveways from adjacent land uses  
balanced with minimizing curb radii.  
9.16.5.Opportunities to provide shared transportation options, such as car-pooling and car-  
sharing, will be encouraged.  
9
.16.6.At grade parking lots will generally be prohibited. Parking, to the extent possible, will  
be accommodated in below-grade parking structures, parking structures internalized  
within a development, or shared multi-storey parking structures. Interim at-grade  
surface parking to temporarily support nearby uses may be permitted. Where  
consideration is given to at-grade parking, the parking area will:  
a) not be located between a building and major public street;  
b) be designed as an extension of the public realm; and  
c) incorporate sustainable design features.  
9
.16.7.Structured parking will efficiently use space, have a high-quality design, be faced with  
active uses at grade on major streets and Priority and Secondary Retail Street and  
Frontages. They will be designed to enable adaptive re-use through the provision of a  
minimum floor to ceiling of 3.0 metres and flat, level surfaces.  
9.16.8.Parking, servicing and loading facilities will be located to:  
a) minimize their visual and functional impact on street edges, on surrounding  
properties, open spaces and pedestrian routes; and  
b) located in the interior of development blocks and accessed from laneways  
or local public streets. Generally, access will not be taken from major public  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
5
OLT-22-002109  
streets identified on Map A. Where this is not possible, accesses to sites will be  
consolidated to minimize interruptions to the public realm.  
1
0.Built Form  
10.1.Development in the Port Lands will contribute to the identity of the Port Lands by:  
a) Responding to surrounding context and character defining features, including  
but not limited to, heritage resources, the river, waterways and the large tracts of  
renaturalizing wilderness;  
b) Framing the naturalized mouth of the Don River adjacent to Commissioners  
Street and the Basin Street extension with a built form condition that reinforces a  
coherently scaled mid-rise character; and  
c) Providing a naturalized, landscaped setback adjacent to Unwin Avenue of not  
less than nine (9) metres in the South Port East, Hearn and South Port Districts.  
Buildings, structures, surface parking and other port/industrial functions will not be  
permitted within the setback.  
10.2.A legible environment will be created that will enable ease of movement and orientation by:  
a) Ensuring the heights and placement of new buildings will preserve or create  
views to specific focal points and heritage resources, as identified on Map 3F and  
described in Appendix 1 to this Area Specific Policy. The heights and placement  
of buildings will frame the respective views and, where applicable, reinforce the  
scale of heritage resources;  
b) Organizing and siting all development to permit the extension of the public street  
network, and in particular to break-up large sites and increase permeability in and  
through the area;  
c) Adequately limiting shadows on public streets, parks and open spaces;  
d) Providing a human-scaled streetwall condition that relates to the proportion of  
streets and planned development on either side of a street; and  
e) Providing on-site landscaping that complements the built form; contributes to an  
overall consistent character of any particular district; and assists in achieving the  
biodiversity objectives of this Area Specific Policy.  
10.3. Development will contribute to creating diverse places in the Port Lands, and also achieve  
variation and visual interest at the block scale.  
10.3.1.A variety of approaches will be utilized for new buildings to achieve visual interest,  
including, but not limited to:  
a) Utilizing vertical and horizontal articulation for building mass to relieve the  
expansiveness of large and undifferentiated blocks and sustain pedestrian  
interest and activity;  
b) Providing variety in the heights of buildings up to any height limits established in  
other policies of the Area Specific Policy; and.  
c) Providing varied building materials and/or colours, among others, with an  
attention to detail to support architectural variety.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
6
OLT-22-002109  
1
0.3.2.The provision of attractive, enclosed storage structures or screening for the bulk  
storage of salt, aggregate or other materials in Port and Port and Industrial districts  
will be utilized, where technically possible, to provide visual interest and reduce  
environmental impacts.  
10.4. Buildings, irrespective of use, need to leave a legacy and be capable of adaptive reuse. This  
will be achieved by:  
a) Requiring buildings to be a minimum of three-storeys adjacent to major public  
streets, with the exception of:  
i. Sites adjacent to Cherry Street south of the Ship Channel that are part of the  
Maritime Hub, where alternative building/structures will be encouraged to  
contribute to the character of the Hub;  
ii. The site on the west side of Leslie Street between Commissioners Street and  
the Leslie Slip Outlook, where buildings may be one- to two-storeys in height;  
iii. Sites adjacent to the east side of Cherry Street (Old) in Villiers Island, where  
building heights may be one- or two-storeys to complement the scale of  
heritage resources; and  
iv. Buildings required for public utility uses and infrastructure.  
b) Designing buildings with high quality architectural finishes and landscaping;  
c) Using robust and durable materiality for buildings that enables longevity of  
the buildings, to withstand deterioration and contribute to the sustainability  
of buildings. Avoiding the waste and pollution of new production, will also be  
encouraged. Development proposals, through the submission of a Sustainability  
Strategy, will be required to demonstrate how the building materiality supports  
longevity and sustainability objectives; and  
d) Providing an urban street-edge relationship for buildings in the McCleary, Media  
City and Turning Basin Districts and for buildings in the Warehouse District with  
buildings built to the lot line adjacent to public streets, with the exception of  
buildings that require a secure perimeter or a setback for safety or operational  
needs, such as some public utility uses and infrastructure.  
10.5. Activity at grade will be provided to enliven areas, and provide day-to-night vibrancy and  
eyes on the street. This may be achieved by:  
a) Animating the public realm with retail and other active uses through design  
strategies including narrow frontages at grade and a wealth of details such as  
recessed entrances, signage, weather protection, and architectural detailing and  
finishes that complement the character of the building and create visual unity of  
the streetscape;  
b) Making the ground-level facades of new buildings transparent for retail, service  
and office uses and the activation uses specified in Policy 4.8.1 a), b), c) and d)  
to allow for two-way visual exchange. In the Priority Retail Streets and Frontages  
and Secondary Retail Street areas, façades shall maximize transparency along  
the horizontal plane at eye level to permit a clear view inward from the street; and  
c) Providing a minimum ground floor height of 5 metres from floor to ceiling in new  
buildings on Priority Retail Streets and Frontages as shown on Map 3C and  
protecting for at-grade street-related retail and service uses on Secondary Retail  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
7
OLT-22-002109  
Streets and Water’s Edge Animation areas shown on Map 3C. To protect for retail  
in these areas:  
i. Floor to ceiling heights will be a minimum of 5 metres in height in new  
buildings; and  
ii. Ground floors in new buildings along key frontages identified on Map 3C will  
be designed to accommodate retail and service uses, including potential future  
conversion to fine-grained retail, by ensuring the ability for entrances at-grade,  
suitable layout with regularized column spacing or ability to subdivide a ground  
floor, suitable depth to accommodate retail and service uses and convenient  
access to loading and storage.  
1
0.6. Development will positively contribute to the creation of a distinct and dynamic skyline  
topography for the Port Lands for the views identified on Map 3F and in Appendix 1. This will  
be achieved by sculpting built form to:  
a) Enhance and diversify the Port Lands’ existing skyline in a way that varies from  
that of Downtown Toronto, while allowing for the continued visual prominence of  
heritage buildings and structures within the Port Lands, subject to view studies;  
b) Contribute to the objectives of diversity and the creation of unique and  
memorable districts by applying different approaches to tall buildings in the  
different districts, and where tall buildings are permitted, including, but not limited  
to, distinct height regimes for each particular district; and  
c) Include a variety of building types within the districts that are full of contrasts –  
high and low, dense and open that both differentiate the Port Lands from the  
rest of the city and differentiate the districts from each other. Building types will  
also be informed by the land use mix permitted in the Port Lands and diverse  
street and block patterns.  
10.7. Tall buildings are buildings that exceed the mid-rise heights identified in this Area Specific  
Policy. Where tall buildings are permitted:  
2
1
0.7.1.Residential tall building floorplates will generally not exceed 750 m measured  
from the exterior of the main walls at each floor above the base building, excluding  
balconies, except where new building typologies are advanced as part of precinct  
planning or a district-wide review of building typologies, to achieve sustainability  
objectives and/or differentiate built form both within the different districts in the Port  
Lands and from the rest of the city. Where new typologies are proposed they will:  
a) ensure that high standards for sunlight on the public realm will be achieved; and  
b) permit larger floorplates provided the impacts of a larger floorplate, such as  
reduction of sunlight, increase in shadow, transition, skyview and wind, can be  
sufficiently mitigated.  
10.7.2.Their design, in terms of form and profile, will make a positive contribution to the Port  
Lands skyline topography.  
1
0.7.3.In order to achieve excellent sky view, light penetration and a predominant mid-rise  
character, a minimum separation distance of 40 metres between the tower component  
of tall buildings is required, or as determined by precinct planning. Additional  
separation distance will be encouraged to maximize skyview.  
10.7.4.To ensure space around taller heritage structures, a minimum separation distance  
of 40 metres is required between the tower component of tall buildings and the  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
8
OLT-22-002109  
predominant face of heritage buildings/structures, that rise above the heights of a base  
building. A minimum separation distance less than 40 metres may be determined by  
precinct planning or a conservation strategy identified through a Heritage Impact  
Assessment to the satisfaction of the City.  
10.7.5.The tower component of the tall building will be stepped back from the base building  
frontage by a minimum of:  
a) 10 metres adjacent to Villers Street in Villiers Island;  
b) 6 metres adjacent to Cherry Street (Old) and Centre Street in Villiers Island, and  
the new East-West street in the McCleary District; and  
c) at least 3 metres on all other public streets, or as determined through precinct  
planning to limit shadowing on key parks and open spaces and to minimize the  
perception of tall buildings at grade from the public realm.  
Balconies projecting into the stepback requirements required in c) above shall gen-  
erally be limited to no more than 1.5m, for no more than 40% of the façade.  
10.7.6.Tall buildings will be located, oriented and massed to:  
a) Maximize sunlight access on streets, and parks and open spaces;  
b) Not shadow the Don Greenway and naturalized river valley below top of bank  
during the spring and fall equinoxes between 10:18 am and 4:18pm; and  
c) Mitigate pedestrian wind impacts to enable comfortable climatic conditions in  
all seasons. Adjustments to building design may relate to the form, setbacks or  
stepbacks of building mass to mitigate impacts. Protective screens and other  
incidental add-ons or landscaping within public spaces may be utilized, but should not  
be relied upon as the preferred wind mitigation.  
10.8. Villiers Island  
10.8.1.The overall character of Villiers Island will be mid-rise in nature, punctuated by a  
limited number of tall buildings in strategic locations.  
1
0.8.2.New Buildings fronting onto the east side of Old Cherry Street will be consistent  
with the low-rise scale of heritage resources. Taller portions of buildings of up to  
approximately 27 metres are permitted provided that they are stepped back a  
minimum of 14 metres from the Old Cherry Street property line. Buildings will be sited  
and articulated to reinforce and showcase the heritage resources of these areas.  
10.8.3.Buildings adjacent to the Keating Channel will be low-rise and complement the scale  
of heritage resources, and will not exceed a height of three storeys (approximately  
11 metres). A five-storey (approximately 17 metres) building may be permitted on  
the west side of the re-aligned Cherry Street (New) adjacent to the Keating Channel  
provided the building does not significantly obscure the historic silos. A school  
building with a maximum height of 18 metres may be permitted on the east side New  
Munitions Street and adjacent to the Keating Channel and Villiers Park, provided  
the building does not significantly shadow Villiers Park. Buildings will be sited and  
articulated to reinforce and showcase the heritage resources of the area.  
1
0.8.4.Mid-rise buildings and base buildings of tall buildings will ensure an appropriate  
human-scale and will be designed to enable sunlight on public streets, solar gain, and  
daylighting within the interior of blocks. They will have a height no greater than:  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
9
9
OLT-22-002109  
a) Ten storeys (approximately 32 metres) for mid-rise buildings and eight storeys  
approximately 26 metres) for base buildings on the south side of Villiers Street;  
(
b) Eight storeys (approximately 26 metres) on New Cherry Street, Munitions Street,  
Centre Street, Trinity Boulevard and Villiers Park Street;  
c) Seven storeys (approximately 23 metres) on Commissioners Street; and  
d) Notwithstanding the above, if above grade parking is provided, an additional  
height of one storey (approximately 4 metres) is permitted above the height  
limits set out in subsections (a), (b) and (c), provided that the additional height  
is stepped back a minimum of 3 metres from the building face along the streets  
noted above.  
1
0.8.5.Tapering of buildings heights and/or stepbacks will be utilized to:  
a) Ensure high standards of sunlight on public streets;  
b) Enable sunlight penetration to interior outdoor amenity spaces and south façades  
of buildings within a development block in support of liveability and sustainability  
objectives; and  
c) Contribute to a consistent street wall condition.  
1
0.8.6.Tall buildings will be located within the development blocks bounded by Centre Street  
to the south and Villiers Street to the north. Tall buildings located south of Centre  
Street are permitted if they are consistent with the policies of this Site and Area  
Specific Policy. Additional considerations for locating tall buildings within this zone  
include:  
a) Marking the New Cherry Street and Munitions Street gateways;  
b) Staggering and sculpting tall buildings to reduce the negative impacts of closely  
spaced tall buildings and the perception of tall buildings at grade, and to prevent  
the appearance of a wall of towers;  
c) Marking Promontory Park and Villiers Park at either end of the Island;  
d) Mitigating pedestrian wind impacts;  
e) Providing a sensitive transition to heritage buildings;  
f) Promoting high standards of sunlight on east-west streets, the Keating Channel  
promenade, Promontory Park, Villiers Park and the river/Don Greenway;  
g) Situating the tall buildings to maximize separation distance to the Cement  
Terminal on Polson Quay;  
h) Responding to site specific considerations, including adaptive reuse of heritage  
buildings;  
i) Situating the highest permitted tall buildings in areas closest to transit stops; and  
j) Leveraging passive solar gain.  
10.8.7.A variety of tall building heights will be provided to punctuate the skyline in accordance  
with the policies of this Area Specific Policy.  
1
0.8.8.Notwithstanding the policy above, one tall building may be permitted in the high  
twenties (up to 29 storeys or approximately 89 metres) at Cherry Street (New) and  
Villiers Street without amendment to this Area Specific Policy to contribute to  
overall built form variability of the Island and provided the building has exceptional  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
00  
OLT-22-002109  
architectural features to positively reinforce the building identity within the overall Port  
Lands skyline.  
10.9. McCleary District  
1
0.9.1.The overall character of the McCleary District will be a lively, dense, mixed-use area  
with an overall mid-rise character that contributes to broader economic objectives for  
the Port Lands and complements the employment destination north of Lake Shore  
Boulevard.  
10.9.2.Development in the District will be organized around a centrally-located local park.  
10.9.3.Tall buildings are permitted within the development blocks adjacent to the Don  
Roadway and Lake Shore Boulevard East.  
1
0.9.4.A height peak that is not to exceed 39 storeys (approximately 119 metres) is permitted  
at the corner of the Don Roadway and Lake Shore Boulevard East and subject to  
appropriate source and receptor mitigation of industrial operations. South and east of  
the height peak, the heights of tall buildings will terrace down in height to the low-  
twenties at Commissioners Street and Bouchette Street respectively.  
10.9.5.Mid-rise buildings and the base of tall buildings will have a height no greater than, unless  
otherwise determined through a Council endorsed precinct planning exercise:  
a) Ten storeys (approximately 30 metres) immediately adjacent to the Lake  
Shore Boulevard and the Don Roadway and terracing down to eight storeys  
(
approximately 26 metres) to the east and south;  
b) Eight storeys (approximately 24 to 26 metres) immediately adjacent to  
Commissioners Street, the Broadview Extension and on the north side of Villiers  
Street; and  
c) Six storeys (approximately 18 to 20 metres) on all remaining streets.  
10.9.6.The siting of tall buildings adjacent to the new east-west street north of  
Commissioners Street will ensure long-views to the Commissioners Incinerator Stack  
from Centre Street in Villiers Island and skyview around the stack.  
10.10. Polson Quay and South River  
10.10.1. Building type and form will be differentiated between Polson Quay and South  
River to assist in achieving diversity and variety.  
1
0.10.2. Buildings will be massed and sited to allow for views to the Hearn chimney  
stack and Canada Cement Company silos, as well as to maintain a high  
degree of visibility surrounding the Hearn chimney stack as viewed from the  
public promenade at the foot of Yonge and eastward to Sherbourne Common,  
subject to the completion of view studies.  
10.10.3. Considerations for the placement, height and location of mid-rise and tall  
buildings at precinct planning will include:  
a) Maintaining the visual prominence of heritage landmarks, and in particular  
the Hearn’s chimney stack, by ensuring heights complement and frame the  
stack with sufficient skyview as viewed from the public promenade at the  
foot of Yonge Street;  
b) Creating distinct identities that differentiate the two districts both from  
themselves and other districts within the Port Lands; and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
01  
OLT-22-002109  
c) Assessing noise and air quality impacts and limiting building heights  
accordingly.  
An Official Plan Amendment implementing the resultant built form directions  
from the Precinct Plan will be required to be adopted by City Council prior to  
considering any applications to amend the Zoning By-law.  
1
0.10.4. In addition to identifying specific measures to mitigate noise and air quality  
impacts, precinct plans may also use development phasing to address land  
use compatibility between the Cement Terminal and sensitive land uses, public  
realm uses and open space uses.  
1
0.10.5. For greater certainty, policy 10.10.4 above shall not have the intent or effect  
of removing, minimizing or contradicting the existing land use permissions  
approved for the Cement Terminal as set out in policy 4.2.2 or the land use  
compatibility policies of section 4.7.  
10.11. Media City  
10.11.1. Up to a maximum of five (5) tall buildings are permitted in Media City in  
strategic locations to support transit-oriented development and activation of the  
public realm, in accordance with applicable provisions under Policy 10.7.  
1
0.11.2. A height peak that is not to exceed 34 stories (approximately 138 metres)  
is permitted in proximity to both the intersection of the Don Roadway and  
Commissioners Street and the intersection of Commissioners Street and  
Broadview Avenue. South of the height peak, the heights of tall buildings will  
terrace down to 17 stories (approximately 73 metres) at the Ship Channel.  
1
0.11.3. Tall buildings in Media City will maintain the intent of Policy 10.7.6 b) by  
ensuring that any shadow on the Don Greenway and naturalized river valley  
is confined to the area just below the top of bank during the spring and fall  
equinoxes for a maximum of 30 minutes between 10:18 AM and 11:18 AM.  
1
1.Arts and Culture  
1
1
1
1.1. Development on land that is privately owned, as of the date of adoption of this Area  
Specific policy, will be encouraged to participate in the City’s Percent for Public Art  
Program. Public art contributions will be encouraged to be pooled toward a larger  
coordinated public program within publicly owned parks, open spaces and streets.  
1.2. Permanent public art installations and/or contributions will be secured for all development  
on land that is municipally owned as of the date of adoption of this Area Specific Policy,  
and for major public works projects in accordance with the City of Toronto’s Percent for  
Public Art Program.  
1.3. Public art is to be located in publicly accessible areas on sites visible from public streets,  
intersections, public plazas, parks or other publically accessible civic spaces. Opportunity  
sites, areas and themes for locating public art include:  
a) Gateways and bridges;  
b) Sites with heritage resources or Destination and/or Catalytic uses;  
c) Parks and natural areas; and  
d) Waterways and the port.  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
02  
OLT-22-002109  
1
1.4. Public art installations should be diverse, including installations that reflect the history of  
the Port Lands and First Nation’s history and culture. Artists will also be encouraged to  
use sustainable materials and/or practices.  
11.5. Public Art Strategies developed during precinct planning will:  
a) Outline more detailed goals and/or principles for public art as they apply to the  
precinct;  
b) Identify priority locations for public art in recognition of the precinct’s vision, the  
local street and block pattern and approach for the public realm;  
c) Identify different types of potential public art installations and themes in  
recognition of precinct features and characteristics, as well as potential target  
audiences;  
d) Identify temporary public art opportunities, including potential strategic  
partnerships and alternative funding sources to be secured; and  
e) Identify a phasing plan and budgetary strategies.  
11.6. Public Art Plans, in accordance with the City’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and  
alignment with any applicable Public Art Strategies, will be required for:  
a) Permanent public art installations associated with development on municipally-  
owned lands or for major capital works. Public Art Plans will be developed when  
development will occur within the district or for each phase of development, and/  
or when a major capital works project is at detailed design; and  
b) Permanent public art installations on privately owned sites secured through the  
development review process. The Public Art Plan will be developed at the time of  
Site Plan Control or prior to the issuance of above-grade building permits.  
11.7. The City will encourage and facilitate:  
a) The development of a range of tourist attractors, high profile events, street  
festivals, permanent destinations, venues for performing arts, and cultural  
attractions and centres capable of drawing visitors both in large and small  
numbers;  
b) New cultural facilities in the Port Lands that both complement the desired mix of  
uses and activate areas;  
c) Affordable rental housing that caters specifically to artists or other creative sector  
employees/entrepreneurs to attract creative practitioners to live in the new  
communities; and  
d) Arts and cultural companies to locate in the area.  
1
2.Innovation and Sustainability  
1
2.1. The objective for the Port Lands is for the area to be a net zero energy district. A net  
zero energy district is a district where no more energy is consumed than is supplied  
by non-fossil fuel sources. All development and public works will support this objective  
through the application of passive and low-impact site, building and street design. It is  
recognized that in addition to site specific approaches, District wide solutions will need to be  
employed to realize the net zero objective.  
12.2. All development on privately-owned land will incorporate passive design approaches and  
will meet the minimum requirements in the applicable Toronto Green Standard.  
Development on publicly-owned land, as of the date of the adoption of this Area Specific  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
03  
OLT-22-002109  
Policy, will be passively designed and be required to meet the Toronto Green Standards  
highest performance measures and include new and emerging approaches for advancing  
a progressive sustainability agenda and showcasing innovation.  
12.2.1.  
While development in Media City will be generally consistent with Policy 12.2,  
alternative approaches for the District will be permitted as follows:  
a) New development will be designed to be district energy ready to allow  
for potential connection to a low-carbon thermal energy network when  
available, in accordance with Policy 14.6.3 and to satisfy the District Energy  
requirements of the Toronto Green Standards;  
b) New development will integrate building-specific low-carbon energy systems  
such as ground-source heating, to help eliminate fossil fuel use on site,  
where feasible, to satisfy the Energy Efficiency requirements of the Toronto  
Green Standards; and,  
c) Urban Forest requirements of the Toronto Green Standards will be pursued  
on a District-wide basis to support resilience in Media City.  
12.3. Passive design approaches and low-impact site design employed in a development will  
include:  
1
1
1
2.3.1. Providing an efficient building shape, scale and massing, location and orientation  
that balances daylighting and reducing incidences of heat loss and energy  
demand;  
2.3.2. Incorporating design features to minimize thermal bridging and heat transfer  
through the façade, including attention to south and west façades to reduce  
summer cooling loads;  
2.3.3. Minimizing the ratio of windows on a façade. Windows should not exceed 50%  
of a façade and a minimum sill height should be provided unless otherwise  
demonstrated through achieving passive design;  
12.3.4. Utilizing advanced windows, where possible with a demonstrated ability to  
minimize heat loss; and  
12.3.5. Retaining stormwater on site through naturalized, low impact approaches at grade  
to the extent possible in an urbanized context.  
1
2.4. Passive design approaches and other measures that will be required for development on  
publicly-owned lands, will be encouraged in development on privately-owned land and  
encouraged in development to be used for the generation, transmission, or distribution of  
energy, or required should legislation enable such elements, include:  
1
2.4.1. Providing high levels of insulation and thermal mass performance to minimize heat  
loss through the selection and use of appropriate building materials internal to the  
building;  
1
2.4.2. Enabling natural ventilation (such as operable windows) where possible and in  
consideration of any receptor mitigation required to ensure compatibility with  
industrial operations;  
12.4.3. Providing dedicated car share parking spaces or parking spaces for other  
emerging technologies, and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure;  
12.4.4. Providing on-site renewable energy, such as solar photovoltaics (PV) and  
other low-carbon on-site energy generation and back-up power, while ensuring  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
04  
OLT-22-002109  
residential amenity and greening potential; and  
1
2.5. Ensuring a high level of airtightness to minimize heat loss from air infiltration and  
minimizing incidences of thermal-bridging that create pathways for heat to move from the  
inside of a building to the outside.  
1
2.6. Where possible and in consideration of existing soil conditions, developments will use  
low impact development strategies to reduce storm water runoff. The following will be  
incorporated into the design of streets where technically feasible:  
12.6.1. locations for bike parking, and in particular, at transit stops and major destinations;  
12.6.2. the provision of dedicated, on-street electric vehicle parking and charging stations;  
and  
12.6.3. the provision of dedicated, on-street car-share parking locations.  
1
3.Biodiversity  
13.1. The following will be required for all development and/or public works, as applicable, to  
ensure a biodiverse Port Lands:  
1
1
1
1
3.1.1. protecting, restoring and enhancing natural heritage features and functions,  
including Environmentally Significant Areas;  
3.1.2. creating new, connected natural areas and greenways and net environmental  
gains associated with Environmentally Significant Areas;  
3.1.3. integrating large areas of naturalized plantings and/or habitat as a component of  
the design for larger parks and open spaces;  
3.1.4. supporting wildlife movement through the Port Lands by creating habitat linkages,  
built landscapes and by retaining decommissioned rail corridors into the Port  
Lands as landscape features;  
1
3.1.5. providing habitat at the site level, including retention or replacement of existing  
natural cover, enhanced landscaped setbacks, naturalized planting, hedgerows,  
and/or integrated stormwater management;  
1
3.1.6. ensuring buildings contribute to biodiversity through measures such as, but not  
limited to, biodiverse green roofs designed to meet the City’s Guidelines for  
Biodiverse Green Roofs, green walls and enhanced bird collision deterrence  
measures;  
1
1
1
3.1.7. providing dedicated spaces within new communities for dog off-leash areas that  
are physically separated from natural areas;  
3.1.8. siting trails/public spaces to maximize functional core habitat within large natural  
areas to avoid bisecting and fragmenting habitat; and  
3.1.9. using exterior site lighting, street lighting or lighting for any recreational uses within  
or adjacent to natural areas that is fully cut-off and designed to minimize excess  
light, skyglow, glare and light spillage.  
13.2. At precinct planning or prior to rezoning land in a precinct, or at Site Plan Control where a  
rezoning is not required, a Naturalization Plan will be prepared, if required by the City.  
13.3. Infrastructure and capital projects, such as new streets, street reconstruction, bikeways,  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
05  
OLT-22-002109  
and multi-use pathways, will provide habitat and wildlife corridors, where appropriate,  
and will include, but not be limited to eco-passages, wildlife crossings and naturalized  
landscaping including understorey plantings and enhancements to the tree canopy.  
Interpretative signage will also be incorporated to educate the public on any biodiversity  
features.  
13.4. In Media City, biodiversity objectives will be focused primarily along the Don Roadway and  
Ship Channel promenade, contributing to a biodiverse Port Lands.  
1
4.Municipal Servicing, Utilities and Green Infrastructure  
1
1
1
4.1. The provision of municipal servicing, utilities and green infrastructure will be coordinated with  
the design of streets and open spaces, and ensure the integrity of flood protection features is  
maintained.  
4.2. The future design of municipal servicing systems will need to ensure space for the provision  
of utilities and undergrounding of hydro transmission wires located along the Don Roadway,  
Commissioners Street and Bouchette Street.  
4.3. The Port Lands has a long history of being an important location for energy generation,  
transmission and distribution facilities to support powering both the Port Lands and  
broader city, connected by a complex web of transmission and distribution lines. Existing  
transmission and distribution facilities in the Port Lands include the Basin Transformer  
Station and Hearn Switching Station. The revitalization of the Port Lands requires ensuring  
these types of facilities can continue to operate as the area transforms. In the event that the  
Stations are relocated and/or reconfigured to support the revitalization:  
14.3.1.Existing facilities must be able to continue to operate while any new/modified facilities  
are relocated and/or reconfigured; and  
1
4.3.2.Strategies will be developed in consultation with the public utilities to address the  
connecting transmission and distribution lines and other associated infrastructure to  
ensure continued and reliable energy supply.  
1
4.4. Infrastructure and energy production facilities needed to support the introduction of a low-  
carbon thermal network or electrical microgrid and information communication technology  
will be protected for and/or incorporated, as applicable, in the design parks and open  
spaces, streets, fixed bridges and/or municipal servicing during precinct planning, Phase 3  
of the Municipal Class Environmental process for streets and municipal servicing and/or at  
detailed design, and should be incorporated and/or protected for in the design of buildings.  
4.5. Development, new utilities or new hydro electric infrastructure will not impede achievement  
of any planned infrastructure corridors or preferred street and transit alignments determined  
through the Environmental Assessment Act process and identified on Maps A or B.  
4.6. Development will be required to:  
1
1
14.6.1.Contribute to the sustainable design of streets;  
1
4.6.2.Provide and pay for local municipal servicing, utilities and streets on-site and  
associated low impact development infrastructure in the abutting boulevard space, to  
service proposed developments; and  
1
4.6.3.Where appropriate, provide proper fit-outs, including necessary above and  
below-grade infrastructure informed by a district energy developer’s connection  
specifications, to ensure connection to future low-carbon thermal energy network, such  
as deep lake water cooling, geo-exchange systems, and/or sewer heat recovery.  
14.7. Development will be encouraged to:  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
06  
OLT-22-002109  
1
4.7.1.Install dual plumbing systems that allow use of harvested rainwater and gray water for  
landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and other uses, as permitted from a public health  
perspective and Building Codes, to reduce the use of potable water;  
14.7.2.Utilize native and low water-use vegetation that does not require permanent irrigation  
systems to reduce the requirement for irrigation; and  
1
4.7.3.Utilize harvested rainwater for landscape irrigation, as permitted from a public health  
perspective and Building Codes, rather than a potable water source. Building roofs  
should incorporate one or more devices for rainfall collection, storage and reuse,  
which could include, but are not limited to green roofs and equipment to harvest, filter  
and/or store rainfall; and  
14.7.4.Install ducting for information communication technology within individual new  
residential and commercial developments.  
1
5.Implementation  
1
1
1
5.1. This Area Specific Policy should be read as a whole with the Central Waterfront Secondary  
Plan to understand its comprehensive and integrative intent as a policy framework for priority  
setting and decision making in the Port Lands.  
5.2. In the case of a conflict between this Area Specific Policy and the policies in the Central  
Waterfront Secondary Plan or in-force Official Plan, the policies in this Area Specific Policy  
will prevail.  
5.3. Precinct Implementation Strategies (commonly referred to as Precinct Plans) will be  
developed by the City and/or its waterfront revitalization partner and adopted by Council for  
Mixed-Use Residential and PIC Mixed-use districts, as well as for the Hearn District, prior to,  
or concurrent with, applications to rezone lands.  
1
5.4. In addition to the requirements set out in Policy 2.2 of the Central Waterfront Secondary  
Plan, the following will be addressed in Precinct Implementation Strategies (or Precinct  
Plans), or concurrent with area wide rezonings and/or site specific rezonings for the Villiers  
Island:  
15.4.1.Detailed noise and air quality studies, or other environmental studies as may be  
required, where sensitive uses are proposed;  
15.4.2.Heritage Evaluation Reports for potential cultural heritage resources identified on Map  
3D and 3E;  
1
5.4.3.View studies in accordance with Policy 6.2.5 of this Area Specific Policy; and  
5.4.4.Naturalization Plans in accordance with the following:  
1
a) Identification and evaluation of any natural features, natural cover and habitat  
(
terrestrial, aquatic and wetland) within or adjacent to the precinct/site and wildlife  
species (migratory and colonizers);  
b) Identification of enhancement strategies to improve existing natural features and  
habitat as part of development;  
c) Identification of parks and open spaces, nodes and patches and opportunities  
and approaches for integrating habitat opportunities alongside other  
programmatic elements in these areas;  
d) Identification of the location and depth of landscaped setbacks and amount of  
landscaped open space at grade on development sites;  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
07  
OLT-22-002109  
e) Identification of any opportunities for integrating existing natural cover or  
hedgerows;  
f) Identification of the wildlife linkages within the district or site, and approaches for  
landscaping and accommodating wildlife movement, including concept designs  
for linkages with plant lists for achieving species diversity within a waterfront  
context;  
g) Identification of the specific strategies to be employed in the precinct or site  
for naturalizing development or to achieve a net environmental gain where  
applicable.  
1
5.5. Development in PIC Core, Light Industrial and Productions, Port and Industrial Districts may  
proceed without the need for a Precinct Implementation Strategy (or Precinct Plan). The  
submission of a Context Area Plan will be required as part of a Complete Application and  
prior to permitting development to demonstrate how the pattern of development and built  
form will implement the requirements and provisions of this Area Specific Policy. Context  
Area Plans will:  
1
5.5.1.Include an area of sufficient size to provide the relationship of the location and  
massing of the proposed development to surrounding buildings, streets, parks, open  
spaces, natural heritage features and heritage resources;  
1
5.5.2.Identify the location of public streets and pedestrian and cycling connections that  
link to the broader networks and support the objectives of this Area Specific Policy,  
or how the development would protect for a fine-grained public street network and  
connections;  
15.5.3.Demonstrate consistency with any Council approved urban design guidelines with  
city-wide application or developed specifically for PIC Core areas;  
15.5.4.Include supporting studies and materials to support the objectives of this Area Specific  
Policy, that may include, but are not limited to:  
a) Heritage Evaluation Reports and/or Heritage Impact Assessments where  
development is on or adjacent to a heritage resource or potential heritage  
resource;  
b) View studies in accordance with Policy 6.2.5 of this Area Specific Policy;  
c) Naturalization Plans in accordance with the requirements identified in policy  
15.4.4;  
d) On-site mitigation plans for new production studios uses operating 24/7 with  
associated truck activities, and Port and Industrial uses that demonstrate, through  
accepted practices, the potential adverse effects and proposed design measures  
at the site proposed to mitigate the effects on sensitive uses and planned  
residential neighbourhoods; and  
e) Infrastructure strategies where a development will proceed in advance of  
implementation of infrastructure determined through an Environmental  
Assessment process. The strategies will identify how a development will  
be serviced, maintained and operated, and demonstrate that the ultimate  
infrastructure as identified in any Environmental Assessment, as may be  
amended, will not be precluded.  
15.6. All development applications will submit relevant drawings, plans and supporting studies and  
materials in accordance with relevant terms of references and as determined during pre-  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
08  
OLT-22-002109  
application consultations to support the policies and objectives of this Area Specific Policy.  
Relevant supporting studies and materials may include, but are not limited to:  
a) A Planning rationale;  
b) Sun/shadow and pedestrian-level wind studies;  
c) Building mass model and view studies;  
d) Heritage impact assessments;  
e) Green Development Standards Checklist and any other reporting required to  
meet the requirements of the Toronto Green Standard;  
f) Energy strategies;  
g) Sustainability strategies, prepared by qualified individuals and to supplement  
reporting requirements associated with the Toronto Green Standard and energy  
strategy, that describe and demonstrate how the proposed development meets  
the sustainability policies of this Area Specific Policy;  
h) Contaminated site assessments;  
i) Arborist tree preservation reports;  
j) Geotechnical studies;  
k) Housing issues reports for residential developments;  
l) Natural heritage impact studies for development proposals adjacent to lands  
identified as Natural Heritage;  
m) Fiscal impact analysis and/or phasing plans where a major development is  
considered to have impacts on the cost of the provision of infrastructure. The  
fiscal impact analysis will be reviewed by Corporate Finance and/or peer  
reviewed at the expense of the applicant;  
n) Servicing and stormwater management reports;  
o) Detailed Noise and/or Air Quality Assessments, and/or other environmental  
studies as appropriate. The Assessments will be peer reviewed at the expense of  
the applicant;  
p) Transportation impact studies and/or traffic operations assessments which  
will identify the demands and impacts of new development and include a  
Travel Demand Management strategy and/or other mitigating measures to  
accommodate travel generated by the development;  
q) Parking and loading studies;  
r) Community services and facilities study; and  
s) Any other information or material that may be needed to review the application  
and depending on the nature or context of the proposed development.  
15.7. Plans of subdivision or rezoning applications for new and/or intensified land use permissions  
in Mixed-Use Residential or PIC Mixed-use districts will not be considered until:  
a) A firm funding commitment has been secured for the necessary flood protection  
measures and associated enabling infrastructure;  
b) A Development Charges By-law has been adopted that includes the necessary  
infrastructure to support the proposed uses; and  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
09  
OLT-22-002109  
c) A Business and Implementation Plan(s), prepared by the City and/or its waterfront  
revitalization partner(s), has been adopted by City Council for publicly owned lands  
that outlines the funding mechanisms and timing for the provision of necessary  
infrastructure to support the proposed uses. For clarity, a City-initiated Business and  
Implementation Plan is not required for privately owned lands.  
15.8. Section 37 of the Planning Act will be required for any area-wide or site-specific rezonings for  
residential uses, and used to secure:  
1
5.8.1.Equitable monetary contributions towards, or the construction and outfitting of, the  
eligible locally-oriented community infrastructure priorities for each district identified  
in Policy 5.5 and as may be refined through the precinct planning process or through  
a city-wide review. Contributions towards community infrastructure will be determined  
on a district basis and by:  
a) establishing the capital cost of the facility(s) and the total value of the monetary  
contribution after Development Charge contributions are determined; and  
b) proportionately distributing the total value of the monetary contribution on a per  
square metre of residential gross floor area in the district; and  
1
5.8.2.The implementation of the affordable rental housing policies of this Area Specific  
Policy, and any additional affordable housing that may be provided over and above  
the minimum affordable rental housing requirements.  
15.9. Section 37 of the Planning Act will also be used to secure:  
15.9.1.Permanent public art installations and/or contributions provided as part of the City’s  
Percent for Public Art Program; and  
15.9.2.Other matters as a legal convenience.  
1
5.10. Established monetary contributions in policy 15.8.1 will be increased over time in accordance  
with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto published by Statistics  
Canada.  
1
5.11. Where a land owner elects to construct and outfit a community infrastructure priority that  
benefits the entire district within which the facility is located, or front-ends growth-related  
infrastructure, fair and equitable cost-sharing arrangements will be secured in a landowner  
agreement and/or front-ending agreement with the City.  
1
5.12. A holding provision may be placed on lands where the ultimate desired use of the lands is  
specified but development cannot take place until conditions set out in this Area Specific  
Policy or by-law are satisfied. In addition to the matters listed in Policy 2.6 of the Central  
Waterfront Secondary Plan, conditions to be met prior to the removal of the holding provision  
may include:  
a) The remedial flood protection works necessary to flood protect a site and/  
or area as required in the approved Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands  
Flood Protection EA are deemed complete and functional from a floodplain  
management perspective with the effect of permanently removing the flooding  
hazard to the satisfaction of the City in consultation with applicable regulatory  
bodies. The City may consider requests to remove a holding provision in situations  
where the construction of buildings are proposed to proceed concurrent with the  
completion of required remedial flood protection works provided occupancy of the  
building can be legally controlled until the required works are complete and  
functional from a floodplain management perspective, Building Code requirements  
can be met to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official,  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
10  
OLT-22-002109  
and life safety risks are adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the City in  
consultation with applicable regulatory bodies.  
b) The provision of adequate street, transit and municipal servicing infrastructure,  
and that parking supply is commensurate with development;  
c) Requirements to determine specific source and/or receptor mitigation as  
established through District-wide Comprehensive Assessments; or the  
specific source and/or receptor mitigation/attenuation measures required to  
enable sensitive land uses as determined in Detailed Noise and Air Quality  
Assessments completed in accordance with relevant terms of references, or other  
environmental studies, accepted by the City during the development approval  
process, including provisions related to how the mitigation/attenuation measures  
will be implemented;  
d) Measures to satisfy the biodiversity objectives of this Area Specific Policy, and to  
protect a natural heritage area or environmentally sensitive natural features;  
e) Measures to protect heritage buildings, properties with archaeological potential  
and archaeological sites;  
f) The provision, timing and appropriateness of affordable rental housing;  
g) The provision of, confirmation of, and/or contributions towards, the necessary  
parks and open spaces and community infrastructure; and/or  
h) Entering into any agreements under the Planning Act, or to secure equitable  
sharing of associated costs for any of the required matters, or to front-end any  
required infrastructure.  
1
5.13. As a condition of development approval, the City will advise development proponents  
in the Lower Don SPA of the risks associated with the construction of buildings and/or  
structures in advance of flood protection infrastructure being complete and functional.  
15.14. The City will require that development proponents seeking approvals in advance of flood  
protection infrastructure being complete and functional to:  
1
5.14.1. Prepare an Emergency Management Plan to the satisfaction of the City, in  
consultation with the TRCA, addressing the protection of human health and  
safety and the protection of property (site, buildings, equipment) during and  
after construction until the TRCA has confirmed in writing that the site is  
permanently flood protected; and  
15.14.2. Enter into an agreement(s) with the City that:  
a) Addresses the protection of public health and safety, the protection of property,  
the acceptance of all risk by the proponent and the removal of any liability for  
public authorities; and  
b) Includes a complete indemnification, to the satisfaction of the City in  
consultation with the TRCA and MMAH/MNRF, of all public authorities from any  
liability and costs, including those due to (i) property damage, injury or loss of  
life due to flooding during and after construction until the flood protection  
infrastructure is complete and functional from a flood plain management  
perspective; and, (ii) losses due to delay caused by a failure of the flood  
protection infrastructure to be completed or to be completed within the  
anticipated time frame.  
15.15. The City and other public agencies shall monitor and maintain the flood protection  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
11  
OLT-22-002109  
infrastructure to confirm its continued function in accordance with the approved  
design, such that it provides permanent protection against future increases in  
regulatory flows and levels in the Lower Don area.  
1
5.16. The Port Lands represents a unique revitalization opportunity for the City. As  
the area transforms, new solutions to pressing challenges facing cities may  
emerge. The City may initiate an amendment(s) to address these where the  
solution(s) would have positive contributions in meeting the vision and  
objectives for the Port Lands as set out in the Central Waterfront Secondary  
Plan and this Area Specific Policy.  
15.17. Maps 3A to 3G and Appendix 1  Views are part of this Area Specific Policy.  
Appendices 2 and 3 are non-statutory.  
1
12  
OLT-22-002109  
1
13  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
14  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
15  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
16  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
17  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
18  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
19  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
20  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
21  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
22  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
23  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
24  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
25  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
26  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
27  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
28  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
29  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
30  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
31  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
32  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
33  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
34  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
35  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
36  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
37  
OLT-22-002109  
Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Schedule C Port Lands Area Specific Policy  
1
38  
OLT-22-002109  
ATTACHMENT 2  
1
39  
OLT-22-002109  


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission