<PAGE>
================================================================================
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended April 30, 1997 OR
[_] TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________ to ____________________
Commission file number 333-20031
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE 77-0344424
[State or other jurisdiction [I.R.S. Employer Identification No.]
of incorporation or organization]
3260 Jay Street
Santa Clara, California 95054
[Address of principal executive offices] [Zip Code]
(408) 988-7020
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $.001 par value,
outstanding at May 25, 1997 was 23,822,000
================================================================================
Page 1 of 21
<PAGE>
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PAGE
PART I. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements:
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
April 30, 1997 and January 31, 1997 3
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
Three months ended April 30, 1997 and 1996 4
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Three months ended April 30, 1997 and 1996 5
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements 6-7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 8-19
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 20
Item 2. Changes in Securities 20
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 20
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 20
Item 5. Other Information 20
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 20
Signatures 21
Page 2 of 21
<PAGE>
Part I. Financial Information
Item I. Financial Statements
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
April 30, January 31,
1997 1997
------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 29,645 $ 13,458
Restricted cash equivalents - 2,224
Short term investments 17,831 -
Accounts receivable 6,175 2,205
Inventory 5,157 5,237
Other current assets 721 344
------------- --------------
Total current assets 59,529 23,468
Property, plant and equipment, net 3,714 3,395
Other assets 206 601
------------- --------------
Total assets $ 63,449 $ 27,464
============= ==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Working capital line of credit $ 10,193 $ 14,224
Accounts payable 4,667 5,175
Accrued expenses 2,347 1,617
Current obligations under capital leases 962 1,054
------------- --------------
Total current liabilities 18,169 22,070
Noncurrent obligations under capital leases 983 1,170
Other long-term liabilities 24 24
------------- --------------
Total liabilities 19,176 23,264
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Noncumulative convertible preferred stock - 12
Common stock 24 8
Additional paid-in-capital 58,321 20,471
Notes receivable from stockholders (822) (822)
Deferred compensation (1,759) (1,889)
Accumulated deficit (11,491) (13,580)
------------- --------------
Total stockholders' equity 44,273 4,200
------------- --------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 63,449 $ 27,464
============= ==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
Page 3 of 21
<PAGE>
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
April 30, April 30,
1997 1996
------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $18,281 $3,520
Cost of sales 11,171 2,818
------------- --------------
Gross profit 7,110 702
Operating expenses:
Research and development 2,467 2,009
Sales, general and administrative 2,277 996
------------- --------------
Total operating expenses 4,744 3,005
------------- --------------
Income (loss) from operations 2,366 (2,303)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest income and other 316 1,076
Interest expense (224) (160)
------------- --------------
Income (loss) before income taxes 2,458 (1,387)
Provision for income taxes 369 -
------------- --------------
Net income (loss) $ 2,089 $ (1,387)
============= ==============
Pro forma net income (loss) per share $.09 $ (.06)
============= ==============
Common and common equivalent shares used in
computing pro forma net income (loss) per share 23,715 22,009
============= ==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
Page 4 of 21
<PAGE>
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
---------------------------------------
April 30, April 30,
1997 1996
----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) $ 2,089 $ (1,387)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 338 169
Amortization of deferred compensation 130 53
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (3,970) (1,747)
Inventory 80 (482)
Other current assets (377) (990)
Other assets 395 (73)
Accounts payable (508) 429
Accrued expenses 730 211
----------------- ----------------
Net cash used in operating activities (1,093) (3,817)
================= ================
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (657) (504)
Purchases of short term investments (17,831) -
----------------- ----------------
Net cash used for investing activities (18,488) (504)
================= ================
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale leaseback liability - 238
Payments on lease liability (279) (242)
Proceeds from working capital line of credit 9,877 3,158
Payments on working capital line of credit (13,908) (132)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 37,854 123
Amounts held as restricted cash 2,224 -
----------------- ----------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 35,768 3,145
================= ================
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 16,187 (1,176)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 13,458 6,877
----------------- ----------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 29,645 $ 5,701
================= ================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
Page 5 of 21
<PAGE>
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation:
The unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and include the accounts of NeoMagic Corporation and its wholly owned
subsidiaries collectively ("NeoMagic" or the "Company"). Certain information and
footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company,
the financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
position at April 30, 1997 and January 31, 1997, and the operating results and
cash flows for the three months ended April 30, 1997 and 1996. These financial
statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited
financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended January 31, 1997,
included in the Company's Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The results of operations for the three months ended April 30, 1997 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
January 31, 1998.
The first fiscal quarters of 1998 and 1997 ended on April 27, 1997 and
April 28, 1996, respectively. For ease of presentation, the accompanying
financial statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar
month.
2. Inventory:
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is
determined by the first-in, first-out method.
April 30, January 31,
Inventory consists of: 1997 1997
--------------- --------------
(in thousands)
Raw materials $ 2,705 $ 464
Work in process 394 948
Finished goods 2,058 3,825
--------------- --------------
Total $ 5,157 $ 5,237
=============== ==============
3. Net Income (Loss) Per Share and Pro forma Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Except as noted below, net income (loss) per share is computed using
the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent
shares outstanding. Common equivalent shares from convertible preferred stock
(using the if-converted method) and from stock options and warrants (using the
treasury stock method) have been included in the computation when dilutive,
except that, pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
Bulletin, common and common equivalent shares issued by the Company at prices
below the initial public offering price during the twelve-month period prior to
the initial public offering have been included in the calculation as if they
were outstanding for all periods presented (using the treasury stock method and
the initial public offering price) through January 31, 1997. Per share
information calculated on this basis is as follows (in thousands except per
share information):
Page 6 of 21
<PAGE>
Three months ended
April 30, April 30,
1997 1996
------------------
Net income (loss) per share $ .09 $(.14)
====== =====
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share 23,715 9,749
The pro forma calculation of net loss per share presented in the
consolidated condensed statements of operations is computed as described above
and also gives retroactive effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of
convertible preferred stock into common stock, which took place upon the closing
of the Company's initial public offering using the as-if-converted method.
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement No. 128, "Earnings per Share", which the Company is required to adopt
on January 31, 1998. At that time, the Company will be required to change the
method currently used to compute earnings per share and to restate all prior
periods. Under the new requirements for calculating basic net income per share,
the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants will be excluded. Basic net
income per share computed in accordance with Statement 128 would have been $.01
greater than the net income per share as reported for the quarter ended April
30, 1997. The impact of Statement 128 on the calculation of fully diluted net
income per share for the quarter ended April 30, 1997 is not expected to be
material. Assuming the retroactive conversion of all outstanding shares of
convertible preferred stock into common stock, there is no impact on the
implementation of Statement 128 to the pro forma net loss per share as reported
for the quarter ended April 30, 1996.
4. Working Capital Line
The Company maintains a revolving credit agreement ("Credit Agreement")
with Mitsubishi International. The Credit Agreement is used to provide 60 day
extended credit terms to finance wafer inventory purchases. The Credit Agreement
was amended to provide that effective April 1, 1997 (i) the permitted borrowings
would be increased from $15 million to $18 million, (ii) the compensating
balance requirement was eliminated and (iii) that the credit agreement expires
on January 31, 1998.
Page 7 of 21
<PAGE>
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
When used in this discussion, the words "expects", "anticipates" and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such
statements, which include statements concerning the timing of availability and
functionality of products under development, product mix, trends in average
selling prices, the growth rate of the market for PCs, the percentage of export
sales and sales to strategic customers, the adoption or retention of industry
standards, and the availability and cost of products from the Company's
suppliers, are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those set forth
below under "Factors that May Affect Results," that could cause actual result to
differ materially from those projected. These forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date hereof. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or
undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking
statements contained herein to reflect any changes in the Company's expectations
with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on
which any such statement is based.
OVERVIEW
The Company designs, develops and markets multimedia accelerators for
sale to notebook computer manufacturers. The Company has developed the first
commercially available high performance silicon technology that integrates large
DRAM memory with analog and logic circuitry to provide a high performance
multimedia solution on a single chip. The Company's Magic Graph 128 family of
pin-compatible multimedia accelerators incorporates a 128-bit memory bus. The
Company believes these products enable notebook PC manufactures to deliver
state-of-the-art multimedia capabilities while decreasing power consumption,
size, system design complexity and cost.
The following information should be read in conjunction with the
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" on pages 19-25 of the Company's Prospectus dated March 13, 1997.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain financial
data as a percentage of net sales:
Three Months Ended
April 30, April 30,
1997 1996
------- -------
Net sales 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of sales 61.1 80.0
------- -------
Gross profit 38.9 20.0
Operating expenses:
Research and development 13.5 57.1
Selling, general and administrative 12.5 28.3
------- -------
Total operating expenses 26.0 85.4
------- -------
Income (loss) from operations 12.9 (65.4)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest income and other 1.7 30.6
Interest expense (1.2) (4.5)
------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes 13.4 (39.3)
Provision for income taxes 2.0 -
------- -------
Net income (loss) 11.4% (39.3)%
======= =======
Page 8 of 21
<PAGE>
NET SALES
The Company's net sales to date have been generated from the sale of
its multimedia accelerators. The Company's products are used in, and its
business is dependent on, the personal computer industry with sales primarily in
Asia, Japan, and the United States. Net sales were $18.3 million for the three
months ended April 30, 1997, compared to $3.5 million for the three months ended
April 30, 1996. Net sales increased primarily as a result of increased market
acceptance of the Company's products, introduction by the Company of additional
products in its MagicGraph128 product family which expanded the portion of the
market addressed by NeoMagic products, and the Company's investment in sales and
marketing activities. The Company expects that the percentage of its net sales
represented by any one product or type of product may change significantly from
period to period as new products are introduced and existing products reach the
end of their product life cycles. Due to competitive price pressures, the
Company's products experience declining unit average selling prices over time,
which at times can be substantial.
Export sales accounted for 80% and 100% of net sales in the three
months ended April 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company expects that
export sales will continue to represent a significant portion of net sales,
although there can be no assurance that export sales as a percentage of net
sales will remain at current levels. All sale transactions were denominated in
U.S. dollars.
Five customers accounted for 21%, 20%, 13%, 11% and 10% of net sales
for the three months ended April 30, 1997. Two customers accounted for 76% and
13% of net sales for the three months ended April 30, 1996. The Company expects
a significant portion of its future sales to remain concentrated within a
limited number of strategic customers. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to retain its strategic customers or that such customers
will not cancel or reschedule orders or, in the event orders are canceled, that
such orders will be replaced by other sales. In addition, sales to any
particular customer may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. The
occurrence of any such events or the loss of a strategic customer could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's operating results.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit was $7.1 million and $702,000 for the three months ended
April 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Gross profit percentages increased to
38.9% for the three months ended April 30, 1997 from 20% in the three months
ended April 30, 1996. The increase in gross profit percentage was due primarily
to lower wafer pricing and improved yields on higher production volumes.
In the future, the Company's gross margin percentages may be affected
by increased competition and related decreases in unit average selling prices
(particularly with respect to older generation products), timing of volume
shipments of new products, the availability and cost of products from the
Company's suppliers and changes in the mix of products sold.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Research and development expenses were $2.5 million and $2.0 for the
three months ended April 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company has made
and intends to continue to make significant investments in research and
development to remain competitive by developing new and enhanced products to
serve its identified markets. Research and development spending increases
primarily reflect additions to the Company's engineering staff. Research and
development spending is expected to increase in absolute dollars in fiscal 1998.
SALES, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Sales, general and administrative expenses were $2.3 and $1.0 million
in the three months ending April 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Sales, general
and administrative expenses increased as a result of
Page 9 of 21
<PAGE>
increased commissions associated with higher sales levels and additional
personnel. The Company anticipates that sales, general and administrative
expenses will increase in absolute dollars in fiscal 1998.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET.
Other income (expense), net decreased to $92,000 in the three months
ended April 30, 1997 from $916,000 in the three months ended April 30, 1996. The
decrease is due to $1.0 million of revenue during the three months ended April
30, 1996 from non-recurring engineering services. Such services consisted
primarily of consulting services and allowing a customer access to certain
technology, previously developed by the Company for its own use, to construct
complex logic. The Company does not expect such engineering services to be
provided on a regular basis, if at all, in future periods.
Therefore, the Company has classified such revenues in other income.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended April
30, 1997 was $1.1million compared to $3.8 million for the three months ended
April 30, 1996. The decrease in net cash used in operations is primarily due to
net income of $2.1 million in the three months ended April 30, 1997 compared to
a net loss of $1.4 million in the three months ended April 30, 1996 offset
partially by an increase in accounts receivable.
Net cash used for investing activities for the three months ended April
30, 1997 and 1996 was $18.5 million and $504,000, respectively. The increase was
primarily due to $17.8 million in purchases of short-term investments in the
period ended April 30, 1997 and additional investments in plant, property and
equipment. The timing and amount of future capital expenditures will depend
primarily on the growth of the Company's future revenues.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended
April 30, 1997 and 1996 was $35.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The
increase primarily represents the initial public offering net proceeds of $37.8
in the first quarter of fiscal 1998 and net repayments related to the Credit
Agreement of $4.0 million.
Working capital at April 30, 1997 was $41.4 million. At April 30, 1997
the Company's principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents
and short-term investments of $47.5 million and borrowings from Mitsubishi
International Corporation, under a working capital revolving credit agreement.
The Company believes these available funds and anticipated funds from operations
will satisfy the Company's projected working capital, and capital expenditure
requirements through the next 12 months, although the Company could be required,
or could elect, to seek to raise additional capital during such period. The
Company's future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the
rate of net sales growth, the timing and extent of spending to support research
and development programs, expansion of sales and marketing, the timing of
introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, and market
acceptance of the Company's products. The Company expects that it may need to
raise additional equity or debt financing in the future. There can be no
assurance that additional equity or debt financing, if required, will be
available on acceptable terms or at all.
INCOME TAXES
The Company's effective tax rate for the three months ended April 30,
1997 was 15%, compared to an effective tax rate for the three months ended April
30, 1996 of 0%. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate and the
statutory rate for the three months ended April 30, 1997 is primarily due to the
utilization of the Company's net operating loss carryforwards.
Page 10 of 21
<PAGE>
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT RESULTS
FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS
NeoMagic's quarterly and annual results of operations are affected by a
variety of factors that could materially adversely affect net sales, gross
profit and income from operations. These factors include, among others, demand
for the Company's products; changes in product or customer mix, (i.e., the
portion of the Company's revenues represented by the Company's various products
and customers); fluctuations in manufacturing yields; incorrect forecasting of
future revenues; availability and cost of manufacturing capacity; unanticipated
delays or problems in the introduction or performance of the Company's next
generation of products; the Company's ability to introduce new products in
accordance with OEM design requirements and design cycles; market acceptance of
the products of the Company's customers; changes in the timing of product orders
due to unexpected delays in the introduction of products of the Company's
customers or due to the life cycles of such customers' products ending earlier
than anticipated; new product announcements or product introductions by
NeoMagic's competitors; competitive pressures resulting in lower selling prices;
the volume of orders that are received and can be fulfilled in a quarter; the
rescheduling or cancellation of orders by customers which cannot be replaced
with orders from other customers; supply constraints for the other components
incorporated into its customers' notebook PC products; foreign exchange rate
fluctuations; the unanticipated loss of any strategic relationship; seasonality
associated with the tendency of PC sales to increase in the second half of each
calendar year; the level of expenditures for research and development and sales,
general and administrative functions of the Company; costs associated with
future litigation; and costs associated with protecting the Company's
intellectual property. Any one or more of these factors could result in the
Company failing to achieve its expectations as to future revenues. The Company
may be unable to adjust spending sufficiently in a timely manner to compensate
for any unexpected sales shortfall, which could materially adversely affect
quarterly operating results. Accordingly, the Company believes that
period-to-period comparisons of its operating results should not be relied upon
as an indication of future performance. In addition, the results of any
quarterly period are not indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal
year. In certain future quarters, the Company's operating results may be below
the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In such event, the
market price of the Common Stock would be materially adversely affected.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH DEPENDENCE ON THE NOTEBOOK PC MARKET
The Company's products are used only in notebook PCs. The notebook PC
market is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards, frequent new product introductions and significant price competition,
resulting in short product life cycles and regular reductions of average selling
prices over the life of a specific product. Although the notebook PC market has
grown substantially in recent years, there is no assurance that such growth will
continue. A reduction in sales of notebook PCs, or a reduction in the growth
rate of such sales, would likely reduce demand for the Company's products.
Moreover, such changes in demand could be large and sudden. Since PC
manufacturers often build inventories during periods of anticipated growth, they
may be left with excess inventories if growth slows or if they have incorrectly
forecast product transitions. In such cases, the PC manufacturers may abruptly
suspend substantially all purchases of additional inventory from suppliers such
as the Company until the excess inventory has been absorbed. Any reduction in
the demand for notebook PCs generally, or for a particular product that
incorporates the Company's multimedia accelerators, could have a material
adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The Company's ability to compete in the future will depend on its ability
to identify and ensure compliance with evolving industry standards.
Unanticipated changes in industry standards could render the Company's products
incompatible with products developed by major hardware manufacturers and
software developers, including Intel Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. The
Company could be required, as a result, to invest significant time and effort to
redesign the Company's products to ensure compliance with relevant standards. If
the Company's products are not in compliance with prevailing industry standards
for a significant period of time, the Company could miss opportunities to
achieve crucial design wins, which could result in a material adverse change in
the Company's business, financial condition and results of
Page 11 of 21
<PAGE>
operations. In addition, the Company's products are designed to afford the
notebook PC manufacturer significant advantages with respect to product
performance, power consumption and size. To the extent that future developments
in other notebook PC components or subassemblies incorporate one or more of the
advantages offered by the Company's products, the market demand for the
Company's products may be negatively impacted, which could result in a material
adverse change in the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
PRODUCT CONCENTRATION; RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIMEDIA PRODUCTS
The Company's revenues are entirely dependent on the market for
multimedia accelerators for notebook PCs, and on the Company's ability to
compete in that market. Since the Company has no other product line, the
Company's revenues and results of operations would be materially adversely
affected if for any reason it were unsuccessful in selling multimedia
accelerators. The notebook PC market frequently undergoes transitions in which
products rapidly incorporate new features and performance standards on an
industry-wide basis. If the Company's products are unable at the beginning of
each such transition to support the new feature sets or performance levels being
required by notebook PC manufacturers, the Company would be likely to lose
design wins and moreover, not have the opportunity to compete for new design
wins until the next product transition occurred. Thus, a failure to develop
products with required feature sets or performance standards or a delay as short
as a few months in bringing a new product to market could significantly reduce
the Company's net sales for a substantial period, which would have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The notebook PC multimedia market is characterized by extreme price
competition. Leading-edge products may command higher average selling prices but
prices decline throughout the product life cycle as comparable and more advanced
products are introduced into the market. As a result, the Company's ability to
maintain average selling prices and gross margins depends substantially on its
ability to continue introducing new products. Its ability to maintain gross
margins is also dependent, but to a lesser extent, upon its ability to reduce
product costs throughout a product life cycle by instituting cost reduction
design changes and yield improvements, persuading customers to adopt
cost-reduced versions of its products and successfully managing its
manufacturing and subcontract relationships. The failure of the Company to
continue designing and introducing advanced products in a timely manner or to
continue reducing product costs would have a material adverse effect on the
Company's net sales, gross margins and results of operations.
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
The Company's sales are concentrated within a limited customer base. The
Company expects that a small number of customers will continue to account for a
substantial portion of its net sales for the foreseeable future. Furthermore,
all of the Company's sales are made on the basis of purchase orders rather than
pursuant to long-term agreements. As a result, the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by
the decision of a single customer to cease using the Company's products or by a
decline in the number of notebook PCs sold by a single customer or by a small
number of customers.
EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN DRAM PRICING
The Company's MagicGraph128 products feature large DRAM memory
integrated with analog and logic circuitry on a single chip, while its
competitors provide only the graphics/video analog and logic circuitry on a
separate chip to be used in conjunction with DRAMs supplied by others. The
prices of the Company's products reflect many factors, including the prices of
DRAM chips. As a result, the Company's business, financial condition and results
of operations may be materially adversely and affected by unanticipated changes
in the price of DRAMs. Such changes are typically sudden and dramatic and can
extend over a significant period of time. For example, the average price of
4-Mbit DRAMs declined by more than 80% in 1996, and this decline affected the
average selling prices of the Company's products. A significant reduction in the
price of DRAMs could cause the Company's products to be less competitively
Page 12 of 21
<PAGE>
priced, potentially affecting ongoing product pricing as well as resulting in
the loss of design wins for new notebook PCs. In this circumstance, competitors
without embedded DRAM could be potentially benefited by DRAM price reductions,
and the Company could be forced to respond to pricing pressures precipitated by
changes in the DRAM market by reducing the average selling prices of its
products to current and prospective system manufacturer customers. Because the
Company's product costs cannot be adjusted as rapidly as changes in average
selling prices to system manufacturers, the Company's net sales and gross profit
would be materially and adversely impacted.
DEPENDENCE ON MANUFACTURING RELATIONSHIPS
The Company's products require wafers manufactured with state-of-the-art
fabrication equipment and techniques. All of the Company's products are
currently manufactured by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation ("Mitsubishi
Electric") in Japan under the terms of a five-year wafer supply agreement.
Mitsubishi Electric is currently producing six-inch wafers for the Company and
expects to begin producing eight-inch wafers utilizing Mitsubishi Electric's
next generation of manufacturing technologies for certain of the Company's new
products in calendar 1997. The Company also has entered into a five-year wafer
supply agreement with Toshiba Corporation ("Toshiba") in Japan to commence
production of the Company's next generation multimedia accelerator products.
NeoMagic does not expect that a significant portion of the Company's wafer
requirements will be met by Toshiba before calendar 1998. The Company expects
that, for the foreseeable future, each of its products will be single source
manufactured. Because the lead time needed to establish a strategic relationship
with a new DRAM partner is at least 12 months and the estimated time for
Mitsubishi Electric to switch to a new product line is four to six months, there
is no readily available alternative source of supply for any specific product. A
manufacturing disruption experienced by either of the Company's manufacturing
partners would impact the production of the Company's business, financial
condition and result of operations. Furthermore, in the event that the
transition to the next generation of manufacturing technologies at Mitsubishi
Electric or the relationship with Toshiba is unsuccessful or delayed, the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be
materially and adversely affected.
There are many other risks associated with the Company's dependence upon
third party manufacturers, including: reduced control over delivery schedules,
quality assurance, manufacturing yields and cost; the potential lack of adequate
capacity during periods of excess demand; limited warranties on wafers supplied
to the Company; and potential misappropriation of NeoMagic intellectual
property. The Company is dependent on Mitsubishi Electric, and expects in the
future to be dependent upon Toshiba as well, to produce wafers of acceptable
quality and with acceptable manufacturing yields, to deliver those wafers to the
Company and its independent assembly and testing subcontractors on a timely
basis and to allocate to the Company a portion of their manufacturing capacity
sufficient to meet the Company's needs. On occasion, the Company has experienced
some of these difficulties. The Company's wafer requirements represent a very
small portion of the total production of these companies. Although the Company's
products are designed using the process design rules of the particular
manufacturer, there can be no assurance that either Mitsubishi Electric or
Toshiba will be able to achieve or maintain acceptable yields or deliver
sufficient quantities of wafers on a timely basis or at an acceptable cost.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that either Mitsubishi Electric or
Toshiba will continue to devote resources to the production of the Company's
products or continue to advance the process design technologies on which the
manufacturing of the Company's products are based. Any such difficulties would
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The Company's products are assembled and tested by third party
subcontractors. The Company does not have long term agreements with any of these
subcontractors. Such assembly and testing is conducted on a purchase order
basis. As a result of its reliance on third party subcontractors to assemble and
test its products, the Company cannot directly control product delivery
schedules, which could lead to product shortages or quality assurance problems
that could increase the costs of manufacturing or assembly of the Company's
products. Due to the amount of time normally required to qualify assembly and
test subcontractors, product shipments could be delayed significantly if the
Company is required to find alternative subcontractors. Any problems associated
with the delivery, quality or cost of the assembly and
Page 13 of 21
<PAGE>
test of the Company's products could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
INVENTORY RISK
Under its wafer supply agreements with Mitsubishi Electric and Toshiba,
the Company is obligated to provide rolling 12-month forecasts of anticipated
purchases and to place binding purchase orders four months prior to shipment. If
the Company cancels a purchase order, it must pay cancellation penalties based
on the status of work in process or the proximity of the cancellation to the
delivery date. Forecasts of monthly purchases may not increase or decrease by
more than a certain percentage from the previous month's forecast without the
manufacturer's consent. Thus, the Company must make forecasts and place purchase
orders for wafers long before it receives purchase orders from its own
customers. This limits the Company's ability to react to fluctuations in demand
for its products, which can be unexpected and dramatic, and from time-to-time
will cause the Company to have an excess or a shortage of wafers for a
particular product. As a result of the long lead time for manufacturing wafers,
semiconductor companies such as the Company from time-to-time must take charges
for excess inventory. For example, the Company booked charges totaling $1.5
million for excess inventory in fiscal 1997. Significant write-offs of excess
inventory could materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition
and results of operations. Conversely, failure to order sufficient wafers would
cause the Company to miss revenue opportunities and, if significant, could
impact sales by the Company's customers, which could adversely affect the
Company's customer relationships and thereby materially adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
MANUFACTURING YIELDS
The fabrication of semiconductors is a complex and precise process.
Because NeoMagic's products feature the integration of large DRAM memory with
analog and logic circuitry on a single chip, a manufacturer must obtain
acceptable yields of both the memory and logic portions of such products,
compounding the complexity of the manufacturing process. As a result, the
Company may face greater manufacturing challenges than its competitors. Minute
levels of contaminants in the manufacturing environment, defects in masks used
to print circuits on a wafer, difficulties in the fabrication process or other
factors can cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or a
significant number of die on each wafer to be nonfunctional. Many of these
problems are difficult to diagnose and time consuming or expensive to remedy. As
a result, semiconductor companies often experience problems in achieving
acceptable wafer manufacturing yields, which are represented by the number of
good die as a proportion of the total number of die on any particular wafer. The
Company purchases wafers, not die, and pays an agreed price for wafers meeting
certain acceptance criteria. Accordingly, the Company bears the risk of final
yield of good die. Poor yields would materially adversely affect the Company's
net sales, gross margins and results of operations.
Semiconductor manufacturing yields are a function both of product design,
which is developed largely by the Company, and process technology, which is
typically proprietary to the manufacturer. Since low yields may result from
either design or process technology failures, yield problems may not be
effectively determined or resolved until an actual product exists that can be
analyzed and tested to identify process sensitivities relating to the design
rules that are used. As a result, yield problems may not be identified until
well into the production process, and resolution of yield problems would require
cooperation by and communication between the Company and the manufacturer. For
example, a design error that resulted in lower than expected yields of finished
products caused the Company to take a $1.2 million charge for the three months
ended July 31, 1996. This risk is compounded by the offshore location of the
Company's manufacturers, increasing the effort and time required to identify,
communicate and resolve manufacturing yield problems. As the Company's
relationships with Toshiba and any additional manufacturing partners develop,
yields could be adversely affected due to difficulties associated with adopting
the Company's technology and product design to the proprietary process
technology and design rules of each manufacturer. Because of the Company's
limited access to wafer fabrication capacity from its manufacturers, any
decrease in manufacturing yields could result in an increase in the Company's
per unit
Page 14 of 21
<PAGE>
costs and force the Company to allocate its available product supply among its
customers, thus potentially adversely impacting customer relationships as well
as revenues and gross profit. There can be no assurance that the Company's
manufacturers will achieve or maintain acceptable manufacturing yields in the
future. The inability of the Company to achieve planned yields from its
manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the Company also
faces the risk of product recalls resulting from design or manufacturing defects
which are not discovered during the manufacturing and testing process. In the
event of a significant number of product returns, the Company's net sales and
gross profit could be materially adversely affected.
DEPENDENCE ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
The Company's business, financial condition and results of operations
will depend to a significant extent on its ability to maintain its position in
the market for multimedia accelerator products that integrate large DRAM with
analog and logic circuitry on a single chip. As a result, the Company believes
that significant expenditures for research and development will continue to be
required in the future. The notebook PC market for which the Company's initial
products are designed is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapidly
changing technology, evolving industry standards and declining average selling
prices. Notebook PC manufactures demand products incorporating rich features and
functionality in order to achieve product differentiation. The Company must
anticipate the features and functionality that the consumer of notebook PCs will
demand, incorporate those features and functionality into products that meet the
exacting design requirements of the notebook PC manufacturers, price its
products competitively, and introduce the products to the market within the
limited window of market demand. The success of new product introductions is
dependent on several factors, including proper new product definition, timely
completion and introduction of new product designs, the ability of Mitsubishi
Electric, Toshiba and any additional strategic manufacturing partners to
effectively design and implement the manufacture of new products, quality of new
products, differentiation of new products from those of the Company's
competitors and market acceptance of NeoMagic's and its customers' products.
There can be no assurance that the products the Company expects to introduce
will incorporate the features and functionality demanded by system manufacturers
and consumers of notebook PCs, will be successfully developed or will be
introduced within the appropriate window of market demand. The failure of the
Company to successfully introduce new products and achieve market acceptance for
such products would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The integration of large DRAM memory with analog and logic circuitry on a
single chip is highly complex and is critical to the Company's success. Because
of the complexity of its products, however, NeoMagic has experienced delays from
time to time in completing development and introduction of new products. In the
event that there are delays in the completion of development of future products,
including the products currently expected to be announced over the next year,
the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be
materially adversely affected. Although the development cycles for the memory
and logic portions of the Company's products have been relatively synchronized
to date, there can be no assurance that this synchronization will continue in
the future. In addition, there can be no assurance that fundamental advances in
either the memory or logic components of the Company's products will not
significantly increase the complexity inherent in the design and manufacture of
MagicGraph128 products, rendering the Company's product technologically
infeasible or uncompetitive. The multiple chip solutions offered by the
Company's competitors are less complex to design and manufacture than the
Company's integrated MagicGraph128 products. As a result, these competitive
solutions may be less expensive, particularly during periods of depressed DRAM
prices. The time required for competitors to develop and introduce competing
products may be shorter and manufacturing yields may be better than those
experienced by the Company.
As the markets for the Company's products continue to develop and
competition increases, NeoMagic anticipates that product life cycles will
shorten and average selling prices will decline. In particular, average selling
prices and, in some cases, gross margin for each of the Company's products will
decline as such products mature. Thus, the Company will need to introduce new
products to maintain average selling prices. There can be no assurance that the
Company will successfully identify new product
Page 15 of 21
<PAGE>
opportunities and develop and bring new products to market in a timely manner,
that products or technologies developed by others will not render NeoMagic's
products or technologies obsolete or uncompetitive, or that the Company's
products will be selected for design into the products of its targeted
customers. The failure of the Company's new product development efforts would
have a material adverse effect on NeoMagic's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
COMPETITION
The market for multimedia accelerators for notebook PCs in which the
Company competes is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapid
technological change, evolving industry standards and declining average selling
prices. NeoMagic believes that the principal factors of competition in this
market are performance, price, features, power consumption, size and software
support. The ability of the Company to compete successfully in the rapidly
evolving notebook PC market depends on a number of factors, including success in
designing and subcontracting the manufacture of new products that implement new
technologies, product quality, reliability, price, the efficiency of production,
design wins for NeoMagic's integrated circuits, ramp up of production of the
Company's products for particular system manufacturers, end-user acceptance of
the system manufacturers' products, market acceptance of competitors' products
and general economic conditions. There can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to compete successfully in the future.
NeoMagic competes with major domestic and international companies, most
of which have substantially greater financial and other resources than the
Company with which to pursue engineering, manufacturing, marketing and
distribution of their products. The Company's principal competitors include
Chips & Technologies, Inc. ("Chips & Technologies"), Cirrus Logic, Inc. ("Cirrus
Logic"), S3 Incorporated ("S3"), and Trident Microsystems, Inc. ("Trident").
NeoMagic may also face increased competition from new entrants into the notebook
PC multimedia accelerator market including from companies currently selling
products designed for desktop PCs. Furthermore, the Company expects that many of
its competitors will seek to develop and introduce products that integrate large
DRAM with analog and logic circuitry on a single chip. For example, Chips &
Technologies and Trident have recently announced separate programs to introduce
in conjunction with Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. ("Samsung"), the world's
largest DRAM manufacturer, an integrated multimedia accelerator solution for the
notebook PC market that would compete directly with the Company's products.
Potential competition also could come from manufacturers that integrate a
microprocessor with a multimedia controller. Although Intel has not announced
any such product, Cyrix Corporation ("Cyrix") recently announced such a product.
To the Company's knowledge, the Cyrix product does not eliminate the need for
multimedia accelerators in notebook PCs. The successful commercial introduction
of such a product that eliminates the need for a separate multimedia accelerator
in notebook PCs could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Some of the Company's current and potential competitors operate their own
manufacturing facilities. Since the Company does not operate its own
manufacturing facility and must make binding commitments to purchase products,
it may not be able to reduce its costs and cycle time or adjust its production
to meet demand as rapidly as companies that operate their own facilities, which
could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, the prices of the Company's products reflect
many factors, including the prices of DRAM chips and non-integrated graphics
chips. Therefore, in some cases, the Company's products may be more expensive
than competitive multiple chip solutions. The Company in the past has lost and
in the future may lose design wins due to this price difference. Furthermore, a
significant reduction in the price of DRAMs could cause the Company's products
to be less competitively priced, potentially affecting ongoing product pricing
as well as resulting in the loss of design wins for new notebook PCs.
Page 16 of 21
<PAGE>
UNCERTAINTY REGARDING PATENTS AND PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
The Company relies in part on patents to protect its intellectual
property. In the United States, the Company has been issued two patents, each
covering certain aspects of the design and architecture of the Company's
multimedia accelerators. In addition, the Company has several patent
applications pending in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the
"PTO"). There can be no assurance that the Company's pending patent applications
or any future applications will be approved, or that any issued patents will
provide the Company with competitive advantages or will not be challenged by
third parties, or that the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on
the Company's ability to do business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance
that others will not independently develop similar products, duplicate the
Company's products or design around any patents that may be issued to the
Company.
The Company also relies on a combination of mask work protection,
trademarks, copyrights, trade secret laws, employee and third-party
nondisclosure agreements and licensing arrangements to protect its intellectual
property. Despite these efforts, there can be no assurance that others will not
independently develop substantially equivalent intellectual property or
otherwise gain access to the Company's trade secrets or intellectual property,
or disclose such intellectual property or trade secrets, or that the Company can
meaningfully protect its intellectual property. A failure by the Company to
meaningfully protect its intellectual property could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a general matter, the semiconductor industry is characterized by
substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights.
The Company in the past has been, and in the future may be, notified that it may
be infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. In November
1994, Cirrus Logic filed suit against the Company and certain of its employees
claiming, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of and
interference with contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. The Company
and Cirrus Logic settled the lawsuit in June 1996, but the Company incurred an
aggregate of $703,000 in expenses in connection with such litigation during
fiscal 1995 and fiscal 1996. This settlement did not involve cash payments but
did include a non-solicitation provision and certain contingent cross-licensing
provisions. In late February 1997, the Company received a written notice from
Cirrus Logic asserting that the Company's MagicGraph128, MagicGraph128V and
MagicGraph128ZV products infringe three United States patents held by Cirrus
Logic. The Company believes that the Company's MagicGraph128, MagicGraph128V and
MagicGraph128ZV products do not infringe any of the claims of these patents.
However, there can be no assurance that Cirrus Logic will not file a lawsuit
against the Company or that the Company would prevail in any such litigation.
In October 1996 the Company was notified by two of its customers that
they had received a letter from the holder of a United States patent asserting
that the video/graphics subsystem in such customers' notebook PCs, which use the
Company's MagicGraph128 and MagicGraph128V products, infringe certain claims of
the patent. The Company has certain indemnification obligations to customers
with respect to the infringement of third-party intellectual property rights by
its products. There can be no assurance that the Company's potential obligations
to indemnify such customers will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company
believes that the Company's MagicGraph128 and MagicGraph128V products do not
infringe any of the claims of such patent. The Company's belief is based upon a
legal opinion from its patent counsel, Townsend. Although there have been no
further communications regarding this matter since October 1996, there can be no
assurance that the holder of such patent will not file a lawsuit against the
Company or its customers, that the Company or such customers would prevail in
any such litigation, or that such customers will continue to purchase the
Company's products under the threat of potential litigation.
Any patent litigation, whether or not determined in the Company's favor
or settled by the Company, would at a minimum be costly and could divert the
efforts and attention of the Company's management and technical personnel from
productive tasks, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no
assurance that current or future infringement claims by third parties or claims
for indemnification by other customers or end users of the
Page 17 of 21
<PAGE>
Company's products resulting from infringement claims will not be asserted in
the future or that such assertions, if proven to be true, will not materially
adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations. In the event of any adverse ruling in any such matter, the Company
could be required to pay substantial damages, which could include treble
damages, cease the manufacturing, use and sale of infringing products,
discontinue the use of certain processes or to obtain a license under the
intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement. There can
be no assurance, however, that a license would be available on reasonable terms
or at all Any limitations on the Company's ability to market its products, or
delays and costs associated with redesigning its products or payments of license
fees to third parties, or any failure by the Company to develop or license a
substitute technology on commercially reasonable terms could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
DEPENDENCE ON INTERNATIONAL SALES AND SUPPLIERS
Export sales are a critical part of the Company's business. Sales to
customers located outside the United States (including sales to foreign
operations customers headquartered in the United States and foreign system
manufacturers that sell to United States-based OEMs) accounted for 90.0% and
96.2% of the Company's net sales for fiscal 1996 and fiscal 1997, respectively.
The Company expects that net sales derived from international sales will
continue to represent a significant portion of its total net sales. Some of the
Company's international sales are supported by letters of credit issued by its
customers. Because the Company's international sales have to date been
denominated in United States dollars, increases in the value of the United
States dollar could increase the price in local currencies of the Company's
products in foreign markets and make the Company's products relatively more
expensive than competitors' products that are denominated in local currencies.
All of the Company's wafers are and for the foreseeable future will be produced
by foreign manufacturers. In addition, many of the components used by the
Company are procured from international sources. Under the Company's wafer
supply agreements with Mitsubishi Electric and Toshiba, products are priced in
Japanese yen. As a result, the Company's cost of goods sold are subject to
fluctuations in the yen-dollar exchange rates. The Company has in the past
hedged its exposure to fluctuations in such foreign currency exchange rate by
purchasing forward contracts and may continue to do so in the future. However,
there can be no assurance that such hedging will be adequate. Significant wafer
or component price increases, fluctuations in currency exchange rates or the
Company's hedging against currency exchange rate fluctuations could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
International sales and manufacturing operations are subject to a variety
of risks, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, tariffs, import
restrictions and other trade barriers, unexpected changes in regulatory
requirements, longer accounts receivable payment cycles, potentially adverse tax
consequences and export license requirements. In addition, the Company is
subject to the risks inherent in conducting business internationally including
foreign government regulation, political and economic instability and unexpected
changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. Moreover, the laws of certain
foreign countries in which the Company's products may be developed, manufactured
or sold, including various countries in Asia, may not protect the Company's
intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United
States, thus increasing the possibility of piracy of the Company's products.
There can be no assurance that one or more of these risk will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
The Company requires substantial working capital to fund its business,
particularly to finance inventories and accounts receivable and for capital
expenditures. The Company believes that the net proceeds of this offering,
together with its existing capital resources, will be sufficient to meet the
Company's capital requirements through the next 12 months, although the Company
could be required, or could elect, to seek to raise additional capital during
such period. The Company's future capital requirements will depend on many
factors, including the rate of net sales growth, the timing and extent of
spending to support research and development programs and expansion of sales and
marketing, the timing
Page 18 of 21
<PAGE>
of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, and
market acceptance of the Company's products. The Company expects that it may
need to raise additional equity or debt financing in the future. There can be no
assurance that additional equity or debt financing, if required, will be
available on acceptable terms or at all.
MANAGEMENT OF EXPANDED OPERATIONS
The Company has experienced, and may continue to experience, periods of
rapid growth and expansion, which have placed, and could continue to place, a
significant strain on the Company's limited personnel and other resources. To
manage these expanded operations effectively, the Company will be required to
continue to improve its operational, financial and management systems. Given its
relatively early stage of development, the Company is dependent upon its ability
to successfully hire, train, motivate and manage its employees, especially its
management and development personnel. If the Company's management is unable to
manage its expanded operations effectively, the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
DEPENDENCE ON QUALIFIED PERSONNEL
The Company's future success depends in part on the continued service of
its key engineering, sales, marketing, manufacturing, finance and executive
personnel, and its ability to identify, hire and retain additional personnel.
There is intense competition for qualified personnel in the semiconductor
industry, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
continue to attract and train qualified personnel necessary for the development
of its business. The Company's anticipated growth is expected to place increased
demands on the Company's resources and will likely require the addition of new
management personnel and the development of additional expertise by existing
management personnel. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit in a timely
manner, key technical and management personnel could be significantly
detrimental to the Company's product development programs or otherwise have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Page 19 of 21
<PAGE>
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
- - ------
None.
ITEM 2. Changes in Securities
- - ------
None.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
- - ------
None.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
- - ------
None.
ITEM 5. Other Information
- - ------
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
- - ------
(a) Exhibits
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
11.1 Computation of Pro Forma
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the three
months ended April 30, 1997.
Page 20 of 21
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NEOMAGIC CORPORATION
(Registrant)
/s/ MERLE MC CLENDON
----------------------------
MERLE MC CLENDON
Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
June 3, 1997
Page 21 of 21
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11.1
EXHIBIT 11.1 COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
April 30, April 30,
1997 1996
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
PRO FORMA NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Weighted average shares outstanding 15,727 6,917
Common equivalent shares from common stock, stock option
and preferred stock warrants granted or issued during the
twelve-month period prior to the Company's initial public
offering related to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4D - 2,832
Dilutive common stock equivalents:
Common stock options, using treasury stock method 1,462
Common stock warrants, using treasury stock
method 274
Convertible preferred stock using the as-if converted method 6,252 -
Adjustment to reflect the effect of the retroactive conversion of
convertible preferred stock from the date of issuance - 12,260
---------- ----------
Common and common equivalent shares used in
the calculation of pro forma net income (loss) per share 23,715 22,009
========== ==========
Net income (loss) $2,089 $(1,387)
Pro forma net income (loss) per share $.09 $(.06)
========== ==========
FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Weighted average shares outstanding 15,727 6,917
Common equivalent shares from common stock, stock option
and preferred stock warrants granted or issued during
the twelve-month period prior to the Company's initial
public offering related to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4D - 2,832
Dilutive common stock equivalents
Common stock options, using treasury stock method 1,630 -
Common stock warrants, using treasury stock method 282 -
Convertible preferred stock using the as-if converted method 6,252 -
Adjustment to reflect the effect of the retroactive conversion of
convertible preferred stock from the date of issuance - 12,260
---------- ----------
Common and common equivalent shares used in
the calculation of net income (loss) per share 23,891 22,009
========== ==========
Net income (loss) $2,089 $(1,387)
Pro forma net income (loss) per share $.09 $(.06)
========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 3 MONTH PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END> APR-27-1997
<CASH> 29,645
<SECURITIES> 17,831
<RECEIVABLES> 6,175
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 5,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 721
<PP&E> 5,720
<DEPRECIATION> 2,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 63,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 18,169
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 24
<OTHER-SE> 44,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 63,449
<SALES> 18,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 18,281
<CGS> 11,171
<TOTAL-COSTS> 11,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 4,744
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 224
<INCOME-PRETAX> 2,458
<INCOME-TAX> 369
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 2,089
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 2,089
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.09
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.09
</TABLE>
