NETTAXI INC
8-K, 2000-04-20
BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC
Previous: BE FREE INC, PRE 14A, 2000-04-20
Next: WORDCRUNCHER INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES, PRE 14A, 2000-04-20



                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K



                                 CURRENT REPORT


                         Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date  of  Report  (Date  of  earliest  event  reported):  March  31,  2000


                                   NETTAXI.COM
                                   -----------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                                    000-26109
                                    ---------
                            (Commission File Number)

             Nevada                                    82-0486102
             ------                                    ----------
  (State or other jurisdiction             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 of incorporation or organization)

                      1696 Dell Avenue, Campbell, CA  95008
                      -------------------------------------
           (Address of Principal Executive Offices Including Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408)879-9880
                                                           -------------


<PAGE>
ITEM  5.     OTHER  EVENTS

     On  March 31, 2000, we filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State
of  California for the County of Santa Clara against RGC International Investors
LDC and certain RGC affiliates, seeking declaratory relief regarding our ability
to  prepay  the  outstanding  balance  of  our  5%  convertible debentures  held
by  RGC. Prior to filing the Complaint, we tendered to RGC the sum of $2,558,800
as  payment in full of the outstanding principal and interest of the convertible
debentures.  The Complaint also seeks damages in excess of $20,000,000 for fraud
and  breach  of  fiduciary  duty  and  rescission of the  underlying  securities
purchase  agreement  and  restitution,  and  requests  injunctive relief against
further wrongful conduct by RGC as well as  an  award  of  attorneys'  fees  and
costs.

     The  factual  basis  for  our  Complaint  stems  from  the  March  31, 1999
securities  purchase agreement between RGC and Nettaxi.com whereby RGC loaned us
the  sum  of  $5,000,000  in  exchange for convertible debentures containing our
promise  to  repay  this sum, convertible into shares of our common stock at the
applicable conversion price, conversion options giving RGC the right to purchase
the  same  number  of  shares as are converted at the same price and warrants to
purchase  up  to  150,000  shares  of  our  common  stock.

     The debentures were convertible at the  option  of  the  holder  into  that
number  of  shares  of  our  common  stock  equal to the principal amount of the
debentures  to  be  converted  including  accrued  interested,  divided  by  the
conversion price, which  is  equal  to the "applicable percentage" multiplied by
the lesser of (i) the  average  of the lowest closing bid prices for our  common
stock on any three trading  days,  which need not be consecutive, during  the 22
consecutive trading day period ending one trading day prior to the conversion of
the  debentures or (ii) $11.88, subject to adjustment  for  stock  splits, stock
dividends, and similar  events.  Initially, the applicable percentage was  100%;
however, it was reduced to  80% when  we did not secure the listing or quotation
of our common stock  on  the Nasdaq National Market by September  27,  1999.  In
addition, at the time  that  a  holder  converts  all  or  any  portion  of  the
debentures, such holder has  an  "investment  option"  which  gives the holder a
right to purchase one additional share of common stock for every share of common
stock issuable as a result  of such conversion at an exercise price equal to the
applicable conversion  price.

     Our  Complaint  alleges  that  we were induced to enter into the securities
purchase agreement and accompanying agreements in reliance upon certain promises
and representations made by RGC, including representations that (i) RGC would be
our  "partner"  for  future rounds of financing; (ii) RGC would avoid taking any
action  which  might  harm  us or our stockholders; (iii) RGC would use its best
efforts  to  promote  our growth and expansion; (iv) RGC would not place its own
interests  above  ours; (v) RGC, when converting the debentures to common stock,
would  not  detrimentally  impact the value of our common stock; (vi) RGC  would
only  sell  our  common  stock in a strong market; (vii) RGC would assist us  in
listing  our  common  stock  on NASDAQ and positioning our stock for a secondary
public offering; (viii) RGC would provide  us  with  additional  financing  when
needed;  and  (ix)  we  could  prepay any debt to RGC, including the convertible
debentures,  using  outside  financing.


                                        2
<PAGE>
     Our  Complaint  alleges  that  at  the  time  RGC  made  these promises and
representations,  it  knew  them to be false and did not intend to perform them.
Rather,  we  believe that RGC's actual intent was to manipulate the price of our
common  stock  through  short sales and cause the common stock price to decline,
thus  obtaining a more favorable conversion price.  Beginning in April 1999, the
price of a share of our common stock declined from $32.00 to approximately $5.00
in November 1999. During the same period, RGC denied our requests for additional
financing  and  refused  to  approve  financing  proposals  from  third parties.

     Commencing  in  November  1999,  RGC  began  to  convert  the  convertible
debentures  and exercise its investment option.  We believe RGC immediately sold
the  resulting  common  stock  into the open market. We believe that as a direct
result  of  this  conduct, the price of our common stock fell dramatically.  The
conversion  price  decreased  accordingly.  Given this impact of the convertible
debentures,  the formula for determining the conversion price, and the lack of a
fixed  conversion  price,  NASDAQ  refused  to  list  our  common  stock.

     As  of  March 31, 2000, $2,600,000 principal amount of the debentures, plus
accrued  interest thereon had been converted into 1,434,695 shares of our common
stock  by  RGC  and  RGC  had  exercised  its  investment options to purchase an
additional  1,434,695  shares  of  common  stock.  As  of  March  15,  2000, the
$2,400,000  principal amount of the convertible debentures, plus an amount equal
to  5%  of  such  principal amount accrued since March 15, 1999, could have been
converted  into  common  stock  at  a  conversion  price  of  $1.1416 per share.

     Shortly  after  tendering  the  funds  to  RGC  to  repay  the  convertible
debentures and filing the Complaint, we received from RGC a mandatory redemption
notice  demanding  immediate  redemption  by us of RGC's outstanding convertible
debentures.  In  its  notice,  RGC claimed that its right to redemption is based
upon  our  alleged  failure to maintain registration under the Securities Act of
1933,  as  amended,  of  the  shares  of Nettaxi.com common stock underlying the
convertible debentures or otherwise issuable under the investment option.     In
May  1999,  we  filed  a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-78129)
covering  approximately  200%  of  the  number  of  shares  of common stock then
issuable  upon  conversion  of  the convertible debentures and exercise of RGC's
investment  option  and  warrants.  This  registration  statement  was  declared
effective  on  August  13,  1999.  Due  to the steep decline in our stock price,
which  we  believe resulted from the actions of RGC, the conversion price of the
convertible   debentures   has   decreased  since  the  effective  date  of  the
registration  statement, and the number of shares issued or issuable pursuant to
the  convertible  debentures  and investment option has increased significantly.
In  fact,  conversions  of the convertible debentures by RGC depleted the shares
available in the first registration statement, and between February 18, 2000 and
February 23, 2000, additional  RGC  conversions  resulted  in  the  issuance  of
734,026 shares of restricted common stock to RGC.  Accordingly, we filed  a  new
registration  statement  on Form S-1  (File No. 333-30074)  covering  additional
shares  of  common stock.  This registration statement was declared effective by
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  April  6,  2000.


                                        3
<PAGE>
     Under the terms of the convertible debentures and accompanying registration
rights  agreement,  the  failure  to make available  shares of registered common
stock  upon  such  conversions  may  have  been  deemed  a  default and may have
constituted  grounds for mandatory redemption of the convertible debentures with
accompanying  financial  penalties.  The  mandatory redemption amount, including
the penalty, claimed by RGC is equal to the  "parity value" of the debentures to
be  redeemed, where the parity value means the product of (i) the highest number
of  shares  of  our  common  stock issuable upon conversion of or otherwise with
respect  to  the  debentures,  including  shares  issuable  upon exercise of the
investment option, immediately preceding the redemption date, multiplied by (ii)
the highest closing bid price of our common stock during the period beginning on
the  date  of the event triggering mandatory redemption and ending one day prior
to the redemption date; provided, however, that in no event would the redemption
price  be less than 120% of  the sum of the then-outstanding principal amount of
the  debentures  and  all accrued  and  unpaid  interest  thereon at the time of
the  redemption. RGC claims that the mandatory redemption amount under the terms
of  the  convertible  debentures,  including  penalties,  equals $33,239,116.41.

     On  April  13,  2000,  RGC  International  Investors, LDC filed a Notice of
Removal  which had the automatic effect of removing the litigation to the United
States  District  Court  for  the  Northern  District  of  California  (Case No.
C-0020404 JF PVT.  On April 14, 2000, RGC and certain  of its affiliates filed a
complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Case
No.  00-405)  against  us,  seeking  declaratory relief regarding the respective
rights  of  RGC  and Nettaxi.com under the securities purchase agreement and the
convertible  debentures.  The Complaint also seeks damages in an amount not less
than   $33,239,116   for  breach  of  the  securities  purchase  agreement,  the
convertible   debentures   and   the   registration  rights  agreement  and  the
accompanying  duty  of  good faith and fair dealing and fraud, rescission of our
February  2000  private placement for the alleged breach of RGC's right of first
refusal  in  the  securities  purchase  agreement  and injunctive relief against
registration  of  Nettaxi.com  common stock in accordance with the February 2000
private  placement.  The  Complaint also requests damages for allegedly libelous
statements  made  by  Nettaxi.com  with  reference  to  RGC  in our registration
statement  on  Form  S-1  filed  on  April  3,  2000  (File  No.  333-30074).

     On  April  18, 2000 we filed an Application for Temporary Restraining Order
and  Order  to  Show  Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction seeking a temporary
restraining  order  restraining RGC from seeking to convert their debenture into
common  stock  and  from selling shares of our common stock in their possession.
The  court  has  ordered  RGC to file its opposition papers on or before Monday,
April 24, 2000.  The court presently intends to take the matter under submission
and  decide  without  oral  argument.

     We intend to vigorously pursue our action against RGC, including our belief
that  we  have the right to prepay the convertible debentures. We also intend to
vigorously  defend  against  the  allegations  set  forth  in  RGC's  complaint.
However,  there  can  be  no assurance that we will be successful in our claims,
that  RGC  will  fail  in  its  attempt  to effect a mandatory redemption of the
convertible  debentures,  or  that  if  successful, that RGC will not be able to
obtain  the  mandatory  redemption  amount it seeks and other damages and relief
sought.


                                        4
<PAGE>
     The  foregoing has included a brief description of some of the terms of the
debentures  and  warrants.  For a more detailed description of the rights of the
holders  of  the  debentures  and  warrants,  please  see  the  actual  form  of
convertible  debenture,  securities  purchase  agreement and registration rights
agreement that have been filed as exhibits to our registration statement on Form
S-1 (No. 333-78129) declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission
on  August  13,  1999.

ITEM  7.     FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND  EXHIBITS

(c)     Exhibits.  The  following  Exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated
herein  by  reference:

Exhibit Number    Description  of  Exhibit
- --------------    ------------------------


*4.3              Convertible  Debenture  dated  March  31, 1999 in favor of RGC
                  International  Investors,  LDC

*10.30            Securities  Purchase  Agreement  dated  March  31, 1999 by and
                  among RGC International  Investors,  LDC  and  the  Company

*10.31            Stock Purchase Warrant dated  March  31, 1999 by and among RGC
                  International  Investors,  LDC  and  the  Company

*10.32            Registration  Rights  Agreement dated March 31,  1999  by  and
                  among RGC International  Investors,  LDC  and  the  Company

*     Incorporated  by  reference  to  the  exhibits filed with the Registrant's
      Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-78129) which was declared
      effective  on  August  13,  1999.


                                        5
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  Section  13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its  behalf  by  the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly  authorized.

                                           NETTAXI.COM

Date: April 20, 2000               By: /s/ Robert  A.  Rositano,  Jr.
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Robert A. Rositano, Jr.,
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                        6
<PAGE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission