GPU INC /PA/
U-1/A, 2000-03-22
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: GENERAL MOTORS CORP, S-4/A, 2000-03-22
Next: HARRIS BANKCORP INC, 10-K405, 2000-03-22






                                                          Amendment No. 3 to
                                                          SEC File No. 70-9599




                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                    FORM U-1

                                   APPLICATION

                                      UNDER

            THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ("Act")

                              GPU, INC. ("GPU")
                              GPX Acquisition Corp.
                               300 Madison Avenue
                          Morristown, New Jersey 07962
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Names of companies filing this statement and
                  addresses of principal executive offices)


                                    GPU, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        (Name of top registered holding company parent of applicants)



S.L. Guibord, Secretary                 Douglas E. Davidson, Esq.
M.J. Connolly, Vice President-          Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP
   Law                                  120 West 45th Street
D.C. Brauer, Vice President             New York, New York  10036
GPU Service, Inc.
300 Madison Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey  07962


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Names and addresses of agents for service)


<PAGE>




            GPU and GPX Acquisition Corp.  ("Acquisition  Corp." and, together
with GPU,  "Applicants"),  hereby  amend  their  Application  on Form U-1,  as
heretofore amended, docketed in SEC File No. 70-9599, as follows:

      I.    By amending  paragraph D of Item 1 thereof to read in its entirety
as follows:

      The merger  agreement  further  provides that following  completion of the
Tender  Offer,  Acquisition  Corp.  will be merged with and into MYR pursuant to
Section 251 of the Delaware  General  Corporation Law ("DGCL") and that MYR will
survive the merger.  If, following  completion of the Tender Offer,  Acquisition
Corp.  has  acquired  ownership  of 90% or more of MYR's  outstanding  shares of
common  stock,  the merger  would be  consummated  pursuant  to the "short  form
merger"  provisions of Section 253 of the DGCL. In such event,  MYR would not be
required  to  convene  a  meeting  of its  stockholders  to vote on the  merger.
Following  completion  of the Tender  Offer,  MYR would,  however,  provide  its
shareholders with an information  circular  pursuant to the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act") prior to the merger.

      Should  Acquisition  Corp. not acquire  ownership of at least 90% of MYR's
outstanding  common stock prior to the merger,  then MYR would convene a meeting
of its shareholders pursuant to Section 251(c) of the DGCL. MYR would distribute
to its shareholders a notice of meeting, proxy statement and forms of proxy, and
may provide other proxy solicitation  materials in accordance with Section 14 of
the Exchange Act and the  Commission's  regulations  thereunder.  Since, at that
time,  MYR would be a "subsidiary  company" of GPU under Section  2(a)(8) of the
Act,  Applicants  request that the Commission's  order  authorizing the proposed
transactions  include  authorization  to solicit  proxies in connection with the
merger pursuant to Section 12 of the Act and Rules 61 and 65 thereunder.

      At the  effective  time of the merger,  each MYR  shareholder  (other than
Acquisition Corp. and any shareholders  exercising statutory  dissenters' rights
to which they may be entitled) will be entitled to receive $30.10 per share upon
surrender  of their  shares of MYR common  stock.  Following  completion  of the
merger,  MYR will be a direct,  wholly-owned  subsidiary of GPU. On February 24,
2000, GPU and Acquisition  Corp.  extended the Tender Offer expiration date from
February 29, 2000 to March 24,  2000.  Applicants  intend to further  extend the
Tender Offer expiration date to a date which occurs as soon as practicable after
issuance  of the  Commission  order  in this  docket  authorizing  the  proposed
transactions.

                                      - 2 -


<PAGE>


      II.   Item 2 thereof is hereby  amended to read in its  entirety to read
as follows:

Item 2.     Fees, Commissions and Expenses
            ------------------------------

      The estimated fees, commissions and expenses Applicants expect to incur in
connection with the proposed transactions are as follows:

      SEC Filing Fee                                                  $ 48,569
      Hart Scott Rodino Act Filing Fee                                  45,000

      Legal Fees:
            Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP                            225,000
            Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson                   300,000
            Ryan Russell Ogden Seltzer LLP                               1,000

      Accounting Fees                                                   10,000
      Tender Offer Information Agent Fees and Expenses                  25,000
      Proxy Solicitation Agent                                          15,000
      Depository                                                        25,000
      Printing and Mailing                                             150,000
      Miscellaneous                                                     30,431
                                                                       -------

            Total                                                     $875,000
                                                                      ========

      III.  Item 3 thereof is hereby amended by adding the following thereto:

      "In  addition,  Rules 61 and 65 are  applicable to certain of the proposed
transactions. "

      4.    By filing the following exhibits in Item 6 thereof:

            F-1   -   Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP

            F-2   -   Opinion of Ryan Russell Ogden Seltzer LLP
















                                      - 3 -


<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

            PURSUANT TO THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY
ACT OF 1935,  THE  UNDERSIGNED  COMPANIES  HAVE DULY CAUSED THIS STATEMENT TO BE
SIGNED ON THEIR BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

                                    GPU, INC.




                                    By:   /s/ T. G. Howson
                                          ----------------------------
                                          T. G. Howson, Vice President
                                          and Treasurer


                                    GPX ACQUISITION CORP.




                                    By:   /s/ T. G.Howson
                                          ----------------------------
                                          T. G. Howson, Treasurer




Date:  March 22, 2000






















                                      - 4 -



                          Exhibits to be filed by Edgar

Exhibits:


            F-1   -     Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP

            F-2   -     Opinion of Ryan Russell Ogden Seltzer LLP









                                                                     Exhibit F-1
                                                                     -----------

                                          March 22, 2000


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

            Re:   SEC File No. 70-9599
                  --------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

            We have examined the  Application  on Form U-1,  dated  December 30,
1999,  under the Public  Utility  Holding  Company Act of 1935,  as amended (the
"Act"),  filed by GPU, Inc. ("GPU") and GPX Acquisition  Corp.  ("GPX") with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  and docketed in SEC File No.  70-9599,  as
amended by Amendment  No. 1 thereto,  dated  January 18, 2000,  Amendment  No. 2
thereto,  dated March 6, 2000, and Amendment No. 3 thereto,  dated this date, of
which this opinion is to be a part. (The Application,  as so amended and as thus
to be amended, is hereinafter referred to as the "Application").

            The  Application  contemplates,  among other  things,  that GPU will
acquire,  through GPX, its direct subsidiary,  all of the issued and outstanding
shares of MYR Group, Inc. ("MYR"),  a Delaware  corporation.  Pursuant to a Plan
and Agreement of Merger dated as of December 21, 1999 ("Merger Agreement"),  GPU
has agreed to pay MYR shareholders  $30.10 per share in cash for their shares of
MYR common  stock and, in  connection  therewith,  has  commenced a tender offer
("Tender  Offer") for these shares pursuant to Rule 51 under the Act. The Merger
Agreement also provides,  among other things,  that (i) following  completion of
the Tender  Offer GPX will be merged with and into MYR  ("Merger"),  pursuant to
which each  shareholder  of MYR other than GPX will receive  $30.10 per share in
cash, with the result that MYR will be a direct wholly-owned  subsidiary of GPU,
and (ii) GPU may issue shares of GPU common stock (the "GPU Exchange Shares") to


<PAGE>


Securities and Exchange Commission
March 22, 2000
Page 2



the holders of MYR stock options and MYR  restricted  stock upon the election of
those  holders.  MYR is a  publicly-held  utility  infrastructure  services  and
electrical  contracting  company.  MYR's business  consists of providing utility
transmission  and  distribution,   infrastructure  and  related  commercial  and
industrial electrical (and some mechanical) contracting services.

            We have been counsel to GPU and to its  subsidiaries for many years.
In such capacity,  we have participated in various  proceedings  relating to GPU
and its  subsidiaries,  and we are  familiar  with the terms of the  outstanding
securities of the corporations comprising the GPU holding company system.

            We have examined  copies,  signed,  certified or otherwise proven to
our  satisfaction,  of the  charter  documents  and by-laws of GPU. We have also
examined such other documents,  instruments and agreements, including the Merger
Agreement,  and have made such further investigation as we have deemed necessary
as a basis for this opinion.

            We are  members  of the  Bar of the  State  of New  York  and do not
purport to be experts on the laws of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the
State of New York and the federal laws of the United States.  We have,  however,
reviewed the General  Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware,  the applicable
provisions  of the Delaware  Constitution  and the reported  judicial  decisions
interpreting those laws to the extent required to express the opinions set forth
herein.  As to  all  matters  herein  which  are  governed  by the  laws  of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,  we have relied upon the opinion of Ryan, Russell,
Ogden & Seltzer LLP which is being filed as Exhibit F-2 to the Application.

            We have assumed that (i) MYR has been validly  organized and is duly
existing  in  accordance  with  the  laws of the  State  of  Delaware;  (ii) all
necessary  corporate  action required on the part of GPU, GPX and MYR shall have
been duly taken;  (iii) the  Commission  shall have  entered an order  forthwith
granting the Application;  and (iv) all action under the Federal securities laws
and state  "Blue Sky" laws to permit the  proposed  transaction  shall have been
completed.


<PAGE>


Securities and Exchange Commission
March 22, 2000

Page 3



            Based  upon and  subject to the  foregoing,  and  assuming  that the
transactions   therein   proposed  are  carried  out  in  accordance   with  the
Application, we are of the opinion that:

                  (a)  all  State  laws   applicable   to  the  proposed
            transactions will have been complied with;

                  (b) GPX will legally  acquire the common stock of MYR pursuant
            to the Tender Offer and, upon  consummation of the Merger,  GPU will
            legally acquire all outstanding shares of MYR common stock;

                  (c) (i) GPU is validly  organized and duly subsisting and (ii)
            the GPU  Exchange  Shares  will be  validly  issued,  fully paid and
            nonassessable,  and the  holders  thereof  will be  entitled  to the
            rights and privileges pertaining thereto set forth in GPU's articles
            of incorporation and by-laws; and

                  (d)  the  consummation  of the  transactions  proposed  in the
            Application  will not violate the legal rights of the holders of any
            securities  issued by GPU or any  "associate  company"  thereof,  as
            defined in the Act.

            We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Application  and in any  proceedings  before the Commission  that may be held in
connection therewith.

                                    Very truly yours,


                                    BERLACK, ISRAELS & LIBERMAN LLP







                                                                     Exhibit F-2
                                                                     -----------

               Letterhead of RYAN, RUSSELL, OGDEN & SELTZER LLP







                                          March 22, 2000


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

            Re:   SEC File No. 70-9599
                  --------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

            We have examined the  Application  on Form U-1,  dated  December 30,
1999,  under the Public  Utility  Holding  Company Act of 1935,  as amended (the
"Act"),  filed by GPU, Inc. ("GPU") and GPX Acquisition  Corp.  ("GPX") with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  and docketed in SEC File No.  70-9599,  as
amended by Amendment  No. 1 thereto,  dated  January 18, 2000,  Amendment  No. 2
thereto,  dated March 6, 2000, and Amendment No. 3 thereto,  dated this date, of
which this opinion is to be a part. (The Application,  as so amended and as thus
to be amended, is hereinafter referred to as the "Application").

            The  Application  contemplates,  among other  things,  that GPU will
acquire,  through GPX, its direct subsidiary,  all of the issued and outstanding
shares of MYR Group, Inc. ("MYR"),  a Delaware  corporation.  Pursuant to a Plan
and Agreement of Merger dated as of December 21, 1999 ("Merger Agreement"),  GPU
has agreed to pay MYR shareholders  $30.10 per share in cash for their shares of
MYR common  stock and, in  connection  therewith,  has  commenced a tender offer
("Tender  Offer") for these shares pursuant to Rule 51 under the Act. The Merger
Agreement also provides,  among other things,  that (i) following  completion of
the Tender  Offer GPX will be merged with and into MYR  ("Merger"),  pursuant to
which each  shareholder  of MYR other than GPX will receive  $30.10 per share in
cash, with the result that MYR will be a direct wholly-owned  subsidiary of GPU,
and (ii) GPU may issue shares of GPU common stock (the "GPU Exchange Shares") to
the holders of MYR stock


<PAGE>


Securities and Exchange Commission
March 22, 2000
Page 2



options and MYR restricted  stock upon the election of those  holders.  MYR is a
publicly-held  utility   infrastructure   services  and  electrical  contracting
company.   MYR's  business  consists  of  providing  utility   transmission  and
distribution,  infrastructure and related  commercial and industrial  electrical
(and some mechanical) contracting services.

            We have been  Pennsylvania  counsel  to GPU and to its  Pennsylvania
subsidiaries for many years. In such capacity,  we have  participated in various
proceedings relating to GPU and its Pennsylvania subsidiaries.

            We have examined  copies,  signed,  certified or otherwise proven to
our  satisfaction,  of the  charter  documents  and by-laws of GPU. We have also
examined such other documents,  instruments and agreements, including the Merger
Agreement,  and have made such further investigation as we have deemed necessary
as a basis for this opinion.

            We are members of the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and do
not purport to be experts on the laws of any other jurisdiction.

            We have assumed that (i) MYR has been validly  organized and is duly
existing  in  accordance  with  the  laws of the  State  of  Delaware;  (ii) all
necessary  corporate  action required on the part of GPU, GPX and MYR shall have
been duly taken;  (iii) the  Commission  shall have  entered an order  forthwith
granting the Application;  and (iv) all action under the Federal securities laws
and state  "Blue Sky" laws to permit the  proposed  transaction  shall have been
completed.

            Based  upon and  subject to the  foregoing,  and  assuming  that the
transactions   therein   proposed  are  carried  out  in  accordance   with  the
Application,  we are of the opinion,  insofar as matters of Pennsylvania law are
concerned, that:

                  (a) all  Pennsylvania  laws applicable to the proposed
            transactions will have been complied with;

                  (b) GPU will legally  acquire all  outstanding  shares
            of MYR common stock;






<PAGE>


Securities and Exchange Commission
March 22, 2000
Page 3



                  (c) (i) GPU is validly  organized  and duly  subsisting in the
            Commonwealth of  Pennsylvania  and (ii) the GPU Exchange Shares will
            be validly  issued,  fully paid and  nonassessble,  and the  holders
            thereof  will be  entitled to the rights and  privileges  pertaining
            thereto set forth in GPU's  articles of  incorporation  and by-laws;
            and

                  (d)  the  consummation  of the  transactions  proposed  in the
            Application  will not violate the legal rights of the holders of any
            securities  issued by GPU or any  "associate  company"  thereof,  as
            defined in the Act.

            We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Application  and in any  proceedings  before the Commission  that may be held in
connection therewith.

                                    Very truly yours,



                                    RYAN, RUSSELL, OGDEN & SELTZER LLP





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission