MEDISCIENCE TECHNOLOGY CORP
8-K, 1997-01-13
SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS
Previous: MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INC, 10-K/A, 1997-01-13
Next: MEDISCIENCE TECHNOLOGY CORP, 10QSB, 1997-01-13



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) January 3, 1997 



                         Mediscience Technology Corporation
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)



     New Jersey                       0-7405                       22-1937826
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (State or other            (Commission File Number)            (IRS Employer
  jurisdiction of                                                Identification
  incorporation)                                                    Number)



               1235 Folkestone Way, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


                                 (609) 428-7952
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Registrant's telephone number, including area code


                                       N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


<PAGE>
Item 5.  Other Materially Important Events

         In a  letter  dated  January  3,  1997  from  the  U.S.  Food  and Drug
Administration (FDA), Registrant,  Mediscience Technology Corp. (OTC: MDSC), was
notified  that the FDA  approved  its  Investigational  Device  Exemption  (IDE)
application to initiate phase II clinical trials with its CD Scan medical device
for early stage detection of cancer.  Attached hereto  and made a part hereof as
exhibit A, is the three page letter from the FDA.
<PAGE>
[GRAPHIC-LOGO}
       DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES        Public Health Service
                                                    Food and Drug Administration
                                                    9200 Corporate Boulevard
                                                    Rockville, MD 20850

Mr. Herbert L. Hugill
President and CEO
Mediscience Technology Corp.
160 Turtle Creek Circle
Oldsmar, Florida 34677

RE:  G960245
     CD-Scan(TM)for early stage, minimally invasive
        detection of aerodigestive cancer
     Dated: December 5, 1996
     Received: December 6, 1996
     HCFA Reimbursement Category : B2

     G960245/A001                            G960245/A002-A004      
     Dated: December 12, 1996                Dated: December 18, 1996
     Received: December 19, 1996             Received: December 19, 1996

     G960245/A005                            G960245/A006-A007
     Dated: December 20, 1996                Dated: December 23, 1996
     Received: December 27, 1996             Received: December 27, 1996

Dear Mr. Hugill:

The food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your investigational  device
exemptions (IDE) application.  Your application is conditionally  approved,  and
you may begin your  investigation,  using a revised  informed  consent  document
which corrects deficiency number one, at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
New York,  New York,  where you have obtained  institutional  review board (IRB)
approval and submitted  certification of IRB approval to FDA. Your investigation
is limited to one institution and 47 subjects.

This approval is being granted on the  condition  that,  within 45 days from the
date  of  this  letter,   you  submit   information   correcting  the  following
deficiencies.

         1. Please revise the informed consent  statement to reflect the present
         state of knowledge with regard to the safety of the device. There is no
         conclusive  scientific  basis to  support  the  connection  that the UV
         radiation  levels  used  with  the  device  are  not  carcinogenic  for
         compromised  tissues.  The informed consent statement should be amended
         as follows:

         "Although preliminary tests conducted on animal and human subjects have
         not revealed any adverse  effects,  the safety of long term exposure to
         ultraviolet  light itself and  ultraviolet  light  combined with 13-cis
         retinoic  acid on the  lining of the mouth  have not been  definitively
         established."

         2. Your protocol  indicates  that some of the subjects will be replaced
         if subsequent clinical and histopathological  evaluation disqualify the
         subjects for  randomization  to drug  treatment.  The protocol does not
         appear to provide follow-up patients who are replaced.
<PAGE>
Page 2 - Mr. Herbert Hugill

         Please  review the  protocol to provide  follow-up  of patients who are
         disqualified  for  randomization.   Until  the  safety  of  ultraviolet
         radiation  exposure is established we believe all patients subjected to
         UV scans with the  CD-Scan(TM)  device  should be followed for the same
         one-year period provided for the randomized subjects.

         3. We were unable to find a discussion  or analysis in your  submission
         to document the accuracy of the data provided on the optical  radiation
         emissions from the device. Please provide an analysis of the sources of
         measurement  error along with a statement of the total  uncertainty  in
         the data.

         4. You  state  that the  probe of the  device  will be  disinfected  by
         immersion in  a 2.4%  glutaraldehyde  solution for 30 minutes  prior to
         application  and  following  each use. This process will be preceded by
         removing the  stainless  steel  encasement  from the optical  fiber and
         physically  cleaning  with alcohol  soaked  swabs.  The process will be
         followed by rinsing the  disinfectant  from the probe in sterile  water
         for one minute.

         Please provide a set of written  instructions  for the user  describing
         the disinfection  process.  The instructions  should contain a detailed
         description  of  how  the  device  is  wiped  of  any  visible  debris,
         disassembled,  an enzymatic  detergent soak (for the appropriate length
         of time), a mechanical  cleaning step using an enzymatic  detergent,  a
         risne step,  the  glutaraldehyde  soak (for the  appropriate  length of
         time), a final rinse step, and finally, reassembly.

         5.  Please  change  the  third  sentence  in the  "Right  to  Refuse or
         Withdraw"  section of the Consent  Form to read,  "If you decide not to
         participate,  the choice of  further  therapy  or  observation  only is
         available to you without  prejudice."  We do not believe the meaning of
         the current statement will be clear to the patient.

         6. Your submission does not identify the two-component heat-cured epoxy
         used to seal the probe fibers inside the stainless steel ferrule.

         Please  provide  the  chemical  composition  of the  epoxy  and  submit
         evidence  that the  material,  in its cured state,  has been tested for
         cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation. We require this testing to
         deomonstrate  the   biocompatibility   of  materials  used  in  mucosal
         tissue-contacting devices.

This information  should be identified as an IDE supplement  referencing the IDE
number above, and must be submitted in triplicate to:

          IDE Document Main Center (HFZ-401)
          Center for Devices and Radiological Health
          Food and Drug Administration
          9200 Corporate Boulevard
          Rockville, MD  20850

If you do not  provide  this  information  within  45 days from the date of this
letter,  we may take  steps  to  propose  withdrawal  of  apporoval  of your IDE
application.
<PAGE>
Page 3 - Mr. Herbert Hugill

We would like to point out that FDA  approval of your IDE  application  does not
imply that this  investigation  will develop sufficient safety and effectiveness
data to assure FDA approval of a premarket  approval (PMA)  application for this
device.  You may obtain the guideline for the preparation of a PMA  application,
entitled   "Premarket  Approval  (PMA)  Manual,"  from  the  Division  of  Small
Manufacturers  Assistance  at its  toll-free  number  (800)  638-2041  or  (301)
443-6597.

We do not believe the proposed feasibility study will provide sufficient data to
support a PMA. The data and information  provided in your IDE  application  does
not  conclusively  or  definitely  establish  safety with  regard to exposure of
compromised tissue to ultraviolet (UV) radiation  emissions from the device. You
have indicated an intent to follow this study with a pivotal clinical trial. For
approval of a future pivotal study,  we will require the completion of an animal
study that clearly demonstrates the safety of UV exposure on compromised tissue.
We also believe a study of human subjects, with a follow-up of at least 3 years,
and a concurrent  control of high risk,  non-UV exposed  subjects,  is needed to
document the safety of the device.

We have enclosed the guidance document entitled "Sponsor's  Responsibilities for
a Significant  Risk Device  Investigation"  to help you understand the functions
and duties of a sponsor. Also enclosed is the guidance document  "Investigators'
Responsibilities for a Significanat Risk Device  Investigation" which you should
provide to participatiang investigators.

If you have any questions, please contact J.Edward Warren at (301) 594-2080.

                                      Sincerely yours,

                                      /s/Lillian Yin, Ph.D.
                                      ---------------------
                                      Lillian Yin, Ph.D.
                                      Director, Division of Reproductive,
                                        Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat,
                                        and Radiological Devices
                                      Offfice of Device Evaluation
                                      Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosures
(1) Sponsors Responsibilities for a Significant Risk Device Investigation
(2) Investigator's Responsibilities for a Significant Risk Device Investigation


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission