MERRILL LYNCH & CO INC
DEF 14A, 1999-03-05
SECURITY BROKERS, DEALERS & FLOTATION COMPANIES
Previous: MERRILL LYNCH & CO INC, 424B3, 1999-03-05
Next: MERRILL LYNCH & CO INC, 10-K405, 1999-03-05



<PAGE>
 
 
                           SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

          Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
                    Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )
        
Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_] 

Check the appropriate box:

[_]  Preliminary Proxy Statement        [_]  Confidential, for Use of the 
                                             Commission Only (as permitted by
                                             Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]  Definitive Proxy Statement 

[_]  Definitive Additional Materials 

[_]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12

                         Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

   
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.

[_]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

   
     (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
         pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
         the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      

     (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (5) Total fee paid:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

[_]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
     
[_]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
     Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
     was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
     number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     
     (1) Amount Previously Paid:
 
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (3) Filing Party:
      
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (4) Date Filed:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:

<PAGE>
 
                                 LOGO
                                 Merrill Lynch


                              [ART APPEARS HERE]


                             1999 PROXY STATEMENT

                 Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
                           to be held April 14, 1999

                           Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
                         Conference and Training Center
                            Plainsboro, New Jersey

                            GRAPHICS APPENDIX LIST



PAGE WHERE
GRAPHIC
APPEARS               DESCRIPTION OF GRAPHIC OR CROSS REFERENCE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cover                Sphere with Merrill Lynch Bull Logo in blue
                        superimposed within such sphere.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>
 

[LOGO] MERRILL LYNCH
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
                                                                  March 5, 1999
 
Dear Stockholder:
 
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held at 10:00 A.M., local time, on Wednesday, April 14, 1999, at the Merrill
Lynch Conference and Training Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey.
 
Information regarding the business of the meeting is set forth in the Notice
of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement that follows this letter. There will be
an opportunity for stockholders to ask questions about our business and to
comment on any aspect of company affairs properly brought before the meeting.
 
We cannot stress strongly enough that your vote is important, regardless of
the number of shares you own. After you have read the Notice of Annual Meeting
and Proxy Statement, and even if you plan to attend the meeting, please
complete and return promptly the enclosed form of proxy to ensure that your
shares will be represented. A return envelope is enclosed for your
convenience.
 
Since mail delays may occur, it is important that the proxy be returned well
in advance of the meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is
exercised. Accordingly, you should sign and return your proxy even if you
think you may decide to attend the meeting and vote your shares in person.
Merrill Lynch will admit to the meeting stockholders of record, persons
holding proof of beneficial ownership or who have been granted proxies, and
any other persons that Merrill Lynch, in its sole discretion, may elect to
admit.
 
We look forward to receiving your vote and seeing you at the meeting. If you
need directions to the meeting, or have a disability that may require special
assistance, please contact our Corporate Secretary, Andrea L. Dulberg, at 100
Church Street, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10080-6512.
 
Sincerely,
 
                          
/s/ David H. Komansky                     /s/ Herbert M. Allison, Jr.

DAVID H. KOMANSKY                         HERBERT M. ALLISON, JR.
Chairman of the Board and                 President and Chief Operating
 Chief Executive Officer                  Officer
<PAGE>
 
[LOGO] MERRILL LYNCH
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                          NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
                                          STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD APRIL 14,
                                          1999
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MERRILL
LYNCH & CO., INC. ("Merrill Lynch"), a Delaware corporation, will be held on
Wednesday, April 14, 1999, at 10:00 A.M., local time, at the Merrill Lynch
Conference and Training Center, 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New
Jersey, for the following purposes:
 
  (1) To elect five directors to the Board of Directors to hold office for a
      term of three years;
 
  (2) To consider a stockholder proposal; and
 
  (3) To transact such other business as properly may come before the Annual
      Meeting and any adjournment thereof.
 
Only holders of Common Stock of record on the books of Merrill Lynch at the
close of business on February 24, 1999 are entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. A list of such
stockholders will be available from April 1, 1999 until prior to the meeting,
as required by law, at the offices of Merrill Lynch Asset Management L.P.
located at 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey. This list will also
be available at the Annual Meeting. The stock transfer books of Merrill Lynch
will not be closed.
 
Public notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was previously included in
Merrill Lynch's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
25, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on
November 9, 1998, and in Merrill Lynch's Report to Shareholders for the first
six months of 1998 mailed to stockholders on August 26, 1998.
 
                                    By Order of the Board of Directors
 
                                            ANDREA L. DULBERG
                                                Secretary
 
New York, New York
March 5, 1999
 
STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO VOTE, SIGN, AND DATE THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY AND
TO RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES.
 
The Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting follows this page. Except for those
who have previously received copies, included with this Proxy Statement and
Notice is Merrill Lynch's 1998 Annual Report, which is not considered proxy
soliciting material.
<PAGE>
 
 
[LOGO] MERRILL LYNCH
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
PROXY STATEMENT
 
                                     ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                                     APRIL 14, 1999
 
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation, on
behalf of the Board of Directors of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Merrill Lynch"), of proxies from those holders of Merrill Lynch
Common Stock, par value $1.33 1/3 per share (the "Common Stock"), eligible to
vote at the forthcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and at any adjournment
thereof, on the matters set forth in the foregoing Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 14, 1999, at
10:00 A.M., local time, at the Merrill Lynch Conference and Training Center,
800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey.
 
                               BENEFICIAL OWNERS
 
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 24, 1999 as
the record date for determining those stockholders entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment thereof. On that date,
there were 364,223,359 shares of Common Stock outstanding (excluding treasury
shares, and including 4,414,794 shares of a Merrill Lynch subsidiary that are
exchangeable at any time into, and carry voting rights equivalent to, the
Common Stock). Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share.
Holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting, present in person or by proxy, constitute a quorum. To the
knowledge of Merrill Lynch, except as provided below, no person is the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
 
                          BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TABLE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   AMOUNT AND NATURE
                 NAME AND ADDRESS                    OF BENEFICIAL     PERCENT
               OF BENEFICIAL OWNER                     OWNERSHIP     OF CLASS(1)
               -------------------                 ----------------- -----------
<S>                                                <C>               <C>
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE
 ("STATE STREET")
 225 Franklin Street
 Boston, Massachusetts 02110
  Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Employee Stock
   Ownership Plan (the "ESOP")....................    26,347,616(2)     7.2%
  Other Merrill Lynch employee benefit plans......    21,129,127(3)     5.8%
  Other...........................................     6,074,121(4)     1.7%
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
Footnotes to Beneficial Ownership Table
 
(1) Percentages are calculated based on the Common Stock outstanding as of
    February 24, 1999.
 
(2) Information concerning the amount and nature of the beneficial ownership
    of the Common Stock is as of February 24, 1999. As of that date,
    25,525,048 shares of Common Stock held by the ESOP were allocated to
    participants (representing 7.0% of the outstanding shares of Common
    Stock), and 822,568 shares of Common Stock held by the ESOP were
    unallocated (representing .2% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock).
    Participants have the right to direct the voting of allocated shares by
    State Street as a co-trustee of the ESOP. Subject to the provisions of the
    ESOP trust agreement, State Street is obligated to vote unallocated shares
    and allocated shares for which it has not received directions in the same
    proportion that allocated shares for which it has received directions are
    voted. The trust agreement also contains provisions regarding the
    allocation, vesting, and disposition of shares.
 
(3) Information concerning the amount and nature of the beneficial ownership
    of the Common Stock is as of February 24, 1999. Participants have the
    right to direct the voting of shares of Common Stock by State Street as a
    co-trustee of these plans. Subject to the provisions of the trust
    agreements relating to these employee benefit plans, State Street is
    obligated to vote shares for which it has not received directions in the
    same proportion that allocated shares for which it has received directions
    are voted. The trust agreements also contain provisions regarding the
    disposition of shares.
 
(4) Information concerning the amount and nature of the beneficial ownership
    of the Common Stock is as of December 31, 1998 and was supplied by means
    of a Schedule 13G Information Statement by State Street. As trustee or
    discretionary advisor for various personal trust accounts and various
    collective investment funds for employee benefit plans and other index
    accounts not affiliated with Merrill Lynch, State Street has sole voting
    power over 4,272,438 of such shares, sole dispositive power over 4,769,493
    of such shares, shared voting power over 1,427,783 of such shares, and
    shared dispositive power over 1,304,628 of such shares.
 
                                       2
<PAGE>
 
          VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING
 
The vote required for the election of directors is a plurality of the votes of
the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by
proxy and entitled to vote. The vote required for the approval of a
stockholder proposal as described herein (the "Stockholder Proposal") and all
other matters is the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common
Stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote.
 
All shares of Common Stock represented by valid proxies received pursuant to
this solicitation and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the choices
specified. Where no specification is made with respect to any item submitted
to a vote, such shares will be voted FOR the election as directors of Merrill
Lynch of the five persons named under the caption Election of Directors--
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors and AGAINST the Stockholder
Proposal. Since the proxy confers discretionary authority to vote upon other
matters that properly may come before the meeting, shares represented by
signed proxies returned to Merrill Lynch will be voted in accordance with the
judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies on any other matters that
properly may be brought before the meeting. Merrill Lynch's by-laws require
prior notification of a stockholder's intent to submit any business to the
meeting. The deadline for such notification has passed and no such
notification has been received.
 
With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor of the
specific candidates or withheld; votes that are withheld will have no effect
on the outcome of the election. With regard to other types of matters
requiring stockholder action, votes may be cast in favor or against, or a
stockholder may abstain. Abstentions will be counted as shares that are
represented at the meeting and entitled to vote. Abstentions on the
Stockholder Proposal will have the effect of a negative vote.
 
Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE"), brokers who
hold shares in street name for customers have the authority to vote on certain
items in the event that they have not received instructions from beneficial
owners. Brokers other than Merrill Lynch's subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("MLPF&S"), that do not receive instructions are
entitled to vote on the election of directors. Under NYSE policy, if MLPF&S
does not receive instructions on the election of directors, it is entitled to
vote shares held by it on behalf of customers only in the same proportion that
the shares voted by all other record holders are voted. With respect to the
Stockholder Proposal, neither MLPF&S nor any other broker may vote shares held
for customers without specific instructions from such customers. Under
applicable Delaware law, a broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome
of the vote on the election of directors or the Stockholder Proposal.
 
The execution of a proxy will not affect a stockholder's right to attend the
Annual Meeting and to vote in person. A stockholder who executes a proxy may
revoke it at any time before it is exercised at the meeting by giving proper
written notice to Darryl W. Colletti, Assistant Secretary of Merrill Lynch, at
100 Church Street, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10080-6512, or by filing another
proxy.
 
It is the policy of Merrill Lynch that all proxies, ballots, and voting
materials that identify the votes of specific stockholders be kept
confidential and not be disclosed to Merrill Lynch, its affiliates, directors,
officers, or employees, subject to limited exceptions, including (i)
disclosure to vote tabulators and
 
                                       3
<PAGE>
 
inspectors of election, (ii) disclosure required by law, (iii) where a
stockholder expressly requests disclosure, (iv) in the context of a bona fide
dispute as to the authenticity of the proxy, ballot or vote, and (v)
disclosure of aggregate vote totals at or in connection with the relevant
meeting of stockholders. This policy does not apply in the event of a
contested election for directors, the attempted removal of directors, any
solicitation of proxies in connection with a merger or business combination,
or a solicitation of proxies by anyone other than the Board of Directors. The
policy is not intended to prohibit stockholders from voluntarily disclosing
their votes to Merrill Lynch or the Board of Directors or to impair the free
and voluntary communication between Merrill Lynch and its stockholders.
 
The expenses involved in the preparation of proxy materials and the
solicitation on behalf of the Board of Directors of proxies for the Annual
Meeting will be borne by Merrill Lynch. In addition to the solicitation of
proxies by mail, solicitation may be made by certain directors, officers, and
other employees of Merrill Lynch or of its subsidiaries in person or by
telephone or other means of communication, for which no additional
compensation will be paid, and will be made by Georgeson & Co., Inc. for which
a fee of $22,000 plus expenses will be paid. Merrill Lynch will reimburse
brokers, including MLPF&S, and other nominees for costs incurred by them in
mailing soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of the Common Stock in
accordance with the rules of the NYSE.
 
The accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP has been selected by the Board of
Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit and Finance Committee of the
Board of Directors, as the independent public accountants of Merrill Lynch and
its subsidiaries during the 1999 fiscal year. Representatives of Deloitte &
Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the
opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to answer
stockholders' questions.
 
                             ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes. Each class serves for a
three-year term and one class of directors is elected each year.
 
The Board of Directors proposes the election as directors of the five persons
named below under Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors. These
persons are to hold office for a term of three years ending in 2002. The
remaining eight directors named below will continue to serve in accordance
with their previous elections. The biographical information presented for the
director nominees and for the directors continuing in office is based upon
information received from the nominees and directors. Unless otherwise
indicated, the offices listed are offices of Merrill Lynch.
 
It is intended that shares of Common Stock represented by proxies received in
response to this Proxy Statement will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees listed below unless otherwise directed by stockholders in their
proxies. While it is not anticipated that any of the nominees will be unable
to take office, if that is the case, such shares will be voted in favor of
such other person or persons proposed by the Board of Directors.
 
                                       4
<PAGE>
 
                NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
                    FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING IN 2002
 
JILL K. CONWAY (64)                                         DIRECTOR SINCE 1978
 
 Visiting Scholar, Massachusetts Institute of Technology since 1985; President
  of Smith College from July 1975 to June 1985. Mrs. Conway serves as a
  director of Allen Telecom Inc., Arthur D. Little, Inc., Colgate-Palmolive
  Company, and NIKE, Inc.
 
GEORGE B. HARVEY (67)                                       DIRECTOR SINCE 1993
 
 Corporate Director; Chairman of the Board of Pitney Bowes Inc., a provider of
  mailing, office and logistics systems and management and financial services,
  from 1983 to December 1996; President and Chief Operating Officer of Pitney
  Bowes Inc. from 1981 to May 1996. Mr. Harvey serves as a director of
  Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, The McGraw-Hill Companies,
  Inc., and Pfizer Inc.
 
DAVID H. KOMANSKY (59)                                      DIRECTOR SINCE 1995
 
 Chairman of the Board since April 1997; Chief Executive Officer since
  December 1996; President and Chief Operating Officer from January 1995 to
  April 1997; Executive Vice President, Debt and Equity Markets Group from May
  1993 to January 1995; Executive Vice President, Debt Markets Group from June
  1992 to April 1993.
 
JOHN L. STEFFENS (57)                                       DIRECTOR SINCE 1997
 
 Vice Chairman of the Board, Head of U.S. Private Client Group since April
  1997; Executive Vice President, Private Client Group from October 1990 to
  April 1997.
 
WILLIAM L. WEISS (69)                                       DIRECTOR SINCE 1993
 
 Corporate Director; Chairman Emeritus of Ameritech Corporation ("Ameritech"),
  a provider of communications and information services; Chairman of the Board
  of Ameritech from 1983 to April 1994; Chief Executive Officer of Ameritech
  from 1983 to December 1993. Mr. Weiss serves as a director of Abbott
  Laboratories, The Quaker Oats Company, and Tenneco Inc.
 
                                       5
<PAGE>
 
            MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
 
WITH TERMS EXPIRING IN 2000
 
W.H. CLARK (66)                                             DIRECTOR SINCE 1995
 
 Corporate Director; Chairman of the Board of Nalco Chemical Company
  ("Nalco"), a producer of specialty chemicals, from 1984 to 1994; Chief
  Executive Officer of Nalco from 1982 to 1994; President of Nalco from 1984
  to 1990. Mr. Clark serves as a director of Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Fort
  James Corporation, Millennium Chemicals Inc., Ultramar Diamond Shamrock
  Corporation, and USG Corporation.
 
STEPHEN L. HAMMERMAN (61)                                   DIRECTOR SINCE 1985
 
 Vice Chairman of the Board since April 1992; General Counsel since October
  1984; General Counsel of MLPF&S from March 1981 to June 1996.
 
AULANA L. PETERS (57)                                       DIRECTOR SINCE 1994
 
 Partner in the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher since 1988 and from 1980
  to 1984; Commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from
  1984 to 1988. Mrs. Peters serves as a director of Callaway Golf Company,
  Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M), Mobil Corporation, and
  Northrop Grumman Corporation.
 
JOHN J. PHELAN, JR. (67)                                    DIRECTOR SINCE 1991
 
 Corporate Director; Senior Adviser to the Boston Consulting Group since
  October 1992; Member of the Council on Foreign Relations since 1988;
  President of the International Federation of Stock Exchanges from January
  1991 to January 1993; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of New York Stock
  Exchange, Inc. from May 1984 to December 1990. Mr. Phelan serves as a
  director of Eastman Kodak Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and
  Sonat Inc.
 
                                       6
<PAGE>
 
 
WITH TERMS EXPIRING IN 2001
 
HERBERT M. ALLISON, JR. (55)                                DIRECTOR SINCE 1997
 
 President and Chief Operating Officer since April 1997; Executive Vice
  President, Corporate and Institutional Client Group from January 1995 to
  April 1997; Executive Vice President, Investment Banking Group from May 1993
  to January 1995; Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration from
  October 1990 to April 1993.
 
WILLIAM R. HOOVER (69)                                      DIRECTOR SINCE 1995
 
 Chairman of the Executive Committee of Computer Sciences Corporation ("CSC"),
  a provider of information technology consulting, systems integration and
  outsourcing to industry and government, since March 1997 and Consultant
  since March 1995; Chairman of the Board of CSC from November 1972 to March
  1997; President of CSC from November 1969 to March 1995; Chief Executive
  Officer of CSC from November 1972 until March 1995. Mr. Hoover serves as a
  director of CSC, Rofin-Sinar Technologies, Inc., and Storage Technology
  Corporation.
 
ROBERT P. LUCIANO (65)                                      DIRECTOR SINCE 1989
 
 Corporate Director; Chairman of the Board of Schering-Plough Corporation, a
  health and personal care products company, from January 1984 to November
  1998; Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough Corporation from February
  1982 to January 1996. Mr. Luciano serves as a director of Schering-Plough
  Corporation, AlliedSignal Inc., and C.R. Bard, Inc.
 
DAVID K. NEWBIGGING (65)                                    DIRECTOR SINCE 1996
 
 Chairman of the Board of Friends' Provident Life Office, a United Kingdom
  based life assurance company; Chairman of the Board of Equitas Holdings
  Limited, the parent company of a group of reinsurance companies based in the
  United Kingdom, from 1995 to 1998; Chairman of the Board and Senior Managing
  Director of Jardine, Matheson & Co. Limited, a Hong Kong-based international
  trading, industrial and financial services group, from 1975 to 1983;
  Chairman of the Board of Rentokil Group PLC, an international support
  services group based in the United Kingdom, from 1987 to 1994. Mr.
  Newbigging serves as the Chairman of the Board of Faupel Trading Group PLC,
  the Deputy Chairman of Benchmark Group PLC, and as a director of Ocean
  Energy, Inc. and Wah Kwong Shipping Holdings Ltd.
 
                             ---------------------
 
Earle H. Harbison, Jr., age 70, has served as a director since 1987 and will
continue to serve as a director until the 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Mr. Harbison has been Chairman of the Board of Harbison Corporation, a
manufacturer of molded plastic products, since September 1993. Mr. Harbison
serves as a director of Harbison Corporation, Angelica Corporation, Mutual of
America, National Life Insurance Company, and RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc.
 
                                       7
<PAGE>
 
               MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
During the 1998 fiscal year, the Board of Directors met twelve times.
 
In addition to an Executive Committee, the Merrill Lynch Board of Directors
has standing Audit and Finance, Management Development and Compensation,
Public Policy and Responsibility, and Nominating Committees.
 
The Audit and Finance Committee is comprised of Mr. Phelan, its Chairman, Mrs.
Peters and Messrs. Clark, Hoover, and Newbigging. This committee held nine
meetings during the 1998 fiscal year. This committee performs the following
functions, among others: monitoring Merrill Lynch's system of internal
accounting controls and overseeing and evaluating the internal audit function;
recommending the appointment and monitoring the performance, independence, and
fees of Merrill Lynch's independent public accountants and monitoring
professional services they provide; reviewing the scope of the annual audit
with the independent public accountants and reviewing their reports with
management; reviewing Merrill Lynch's annual consolidated financial
statements; overseeing Merrill Lynch's corporate funding policy, securities
offerings, financial commitments and related policies; and monitoring
compliance with risk management and compliance policies and procedures.
 
The Management Development and Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr.
Luciano, its Chairman, Mrs. Conway and Messrs. Harbison, Harvey, and Weiss.
This committee held nine meetings during the 1998 fiscal year. This committee
performs the following functions, among others: reviewing and recommending
employee compensation programs, policies, and practices, including salary,
cash incentive, long-term incentive compensation, stock purchase, retirement,
and health and welfare programs; making grants under the Merrill Lynch Long-
Term Incentive Compensation Plan and other stock-based compensation plans;
discharging the responsibilities described below under the caption Management
Development and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation; and
reviewing management development programs and executive succession plans.
 
The Public Policy and Responsibility Committee is comprised of Mr. Weiss, its
Chairman, Mrs. Peters and Mr. Newbigging. This committee held two meetings
during the 1998 fiscal year. This committee's function is to assist the Board
of Directors and senior management in overseeing Merrill Lynch's fulfillment
internationally of its principles of Respect for the Individual, Teamwork,
Responsible Citizenship, and Integrity by reviewing and, where appropriate,
making recommendations about: Merrill Lynch's political and charitable
contributions policies and practices and Merrill Lynch's policies and actions
as they relate to social and public policy issues that affect Merrill Lynch's
business throughout the world.
 
The Nominating Committee is comprised of Mrs. Conway, its Chairwoman, Messrs.
Harbison and Luciano (who are voting members) and Mr. Komansky (who is a non-
voting member). This committee did not meet during the 1998 fiscal year but
its members did conduct discussions over the course of the year. This
committee performs the following functions: identifying potential candidates
to serve on the Board of Directors with a view toward a desirable balance of
expertise among Board members and making recommendations to the Board relating
to the membership of committees of the Board and nominees to fill vacancies on
the Board. The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by
stockholders. Those wishing to submit recommendations for the 2000 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders should write to Andrea L. Dulberg, Secretary, Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc., 100 Church Street, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10080-6512.
 
                                       8
<PAGE>
 
           BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
The following table contains certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of Common Stock and Common Stock-linked units by each director,
director nominee, and executive officer named in the Summary Compensation
Table herein as well as by all current directors and executive officers as a
group. All information is provided as of February 24, 1999.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    COMMON STOCK
                                             COMMON STOCK(1)          UNITS(2)
                                             ---------------        ------------
<S>                                          <C>                    <C>
Herbert M. Allison, Jr. ....................    1,903,271(3)(4)        22,297
W.H. Clark..................................        5,154               1,828
Jill K. Conway..............................        7,753               1,828
Stephen L. Hammerman........................    1,159,591(3)(5)        13,032
Earle H. Harbison, Jr. .....................        7,098(4)            1,140
George B. Harvey............................        7,606               1,889
William R. Hoover...........................        5,290               1,828
David H. Komansky...........................    2,132,250(3)           28,157
Robert P. Luciano...........................        8,985               1,905
David K. Newbigging.........................        5,999               3,247
E. Stanley O'Neal...........................      308,174(3)           19,032
Jeffrey M. Peek.............................      494,819(3)           14,967
Aulana L. Peters............................        1,978               7,253
John J. Phelan, Jr. ........................        8,985               1,828
John L. Steffens............................    2,106,598(3)           18,812
William L. Weiss............................        5,793               1,484
All Merrill Lynch directors and executive
 officers as a group........................   11,948,808(3)(4)(5)    198,805
</TABLE>
 
- ----------------
 
(1) All nominees, directors, and executive officers have sole investment power
    and sole voting power over all shares of Common Stock listed, except as
    indicated in notes 3, 4, and 5 below. No individual director, director
    nominee, or executive officer beneficially owned in excess of 1% of the
    outstanding Common Stock. The group consisting of all directors and
    executive officers of Merrill Lynch beneficially owned approximately 3.1% of
    the outstanding Common Stock.
 
    The beneficial ownership information shown in this table for the following
    individuals and for the group consisting of all directors and executive
    officers of Merrill Lynch includes the indicated number of shares of Common
    Stock deliverable at the end of the restricted or deferral period applicable
    to (i) Deferred Stock Units issued under the Merrill Lynch Deferred Unit and
    Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors; (ii) Stock Units under the
    Merrill Lynch Program for Deferral of Stock Option Gains for a Select Group
    of Eligible Employees; or (iii) Restricted Units issued in 1999 under the
    Merrill Lynch Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan: Mr. Allison (150,772);
    Mr. Hammerman (7,239); Mr. Komansky (316,343); Mr. O'Neal (9,040); Mr. Peek
    (8,687); Mr. Steffens (10,947); Mrs. Conway (1,145); Mr. Harbison (458); Mr.
    Harvey (442); Mr. Luciano (1,145); Mr. Newbigging (1,499); Mr. Phelan
    (1,145); Mr. Weiss (221); and all directors and executive officers of
    Merrill Lynch as a group (543,036). These shares are not included for the
    purpose of calculating the percentages set forth in the first paragraph of
    this note 1 as they cannot be acquired within 60 days of February 24, 1999.
 
                                       9
<PAGE>
 
Footnotes to Directors and Executive Officers Beneficial Ownership Table
Continued
 
(2) Consists of units linked to the value of the Common Stock but payable only
    in cash at the end of the restricted or deferral period applicable to (i)
    Restricted Units issued prior to 1999 under the Merrill Lynch Long-Term
    Incentive Compensation Plan; (ii) Deferred Units issued under the Merrill
    Lynch Deferred Unit and Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors; (iii)
    Stock Units under the Merrill Lynch Fee Deferral Plan for Non-Employee
    Directors; or (iv) Cash Units under the Merrill Lynch Program for Deferral
    of Stock Option Gains for a Select Group of Eligible Employees.
 
(3) The beneficial ownership information in the table shown for the following
    individuals and for the group consisting of all directors and executive
    officers of Merrill Lynch includes the indicated number of shares of
    Common Stock that may be purchased upon the exercise (presently or within
    60 days of February 24, 1999) of Stock Options granted under the Merrill
    Lynch Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan: Mr. Allison (1,412,010); Mr.
    Hammerman (766,779); Mr. Komansky (1,371,825); Mr. O'Neal (215,741); Mr.
    Peek (299,155); Mr. Steffens (1,112,211); and all directors and executive
    officers of Merrill Lynch as a group (7,451,463).
 
(4) The beneficial ownership information shown for Messrs. Allison and
    Harbison excludes shares held by the wives of these individuals (13,800
    shares in the case of Mr. Allison, and 4,000 shares in the case of Mr.
    Harbison). Each has expressly disclaimed beneficial ownership of the
    shares held by his wife. Beneficial ownership for the group consisting of
    all directors and executive officers of Merrill Lynch excludes these
    amounts.
 
(5) The beneficial ownership information shown for Mr. Hammerman includes
    36,000 shares held in trusts as to which Mr. Hammerman has shared voting
    and investment power, and 3,000 shares held by a charitable foundation as
    to which Mr. Hammerman has shared voting and investment power. The
    beneficial ownership information shown for the group consisting of all
    directors and executive officers of Merrill Lynch reflects these shares
    and also includes the following shares: 12,329 shares held by charitable
    foundations as to which an executive officer has shared voting and
    investment power; and 5,232 shares held in custodial accounts as to which
    an executive officer has shared voting and investment power.
 
                                      10
<PAGE>
 
                             STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
 
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis, Watergate Office Building, 2600 Virginia Ave., N.W.,
Suite 215, Washington, D.C. 20037, holding 400 shares of Common Stock, has
given notice of her intention to propose the following resolution at the
Annual Meeting:
 
  RESOLVED: "That the stockholders of Merrill Lynch, assembled in Annual
  Meeting in person and by proxy, hereby request the Board of Directors to
  take the necessary steps to provide for cumulative voting in the election
  of directors, which means each stockholder shall be entitled to as many
  votes as shall equal the number of shares he or she owns multiplied by the
  number of directors to be elected, and he or she may cast all of such votes
  for a single candidate, or any two or more of them as he or she may see
  fit."
 
The following statement has been submitted by Mrs. Davis in support of the
resolution:
 
  REASONS: "Many states have mandatory cumulative voting, so do National
  Banks."
 
  "In addition, many corporations have adopted cumulative voting."
 
  "Last year the owners of 56,960,000 shares, representing approximately
  23.4% of shares voting, voted FOR this proposal."
 
  "If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution."
 
                             ---------------------
 
FOR THE REASONS STATED BELOW, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
THE ADOPTION OF THIS STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.
 
This proposal, which has been submitted by this proponent to Merrill Lynch's
Annual Meetings of Stockholders for the fourteenth time, has been consistently
opposed by the Board of Directors and has been defeated by stockholders by a
substantial majority of the votes cast on each occasion.
 
As previously discussed in past statements in opposition, the Board of
Directors opposes this proposal because it believes that it is contrary to the
best interests of all of the stockholders. Under the General Corporation Law
of Delaware, Merrill Lynch's state of incorporation, the general rule is that
each director must be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares
present in person or represented by proxy. Cumulative voting is permissible
only if specifically provided for in a corporation's certificate of
incorporation. Many public companies, including a substantial majority of the
thirty companies included in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, do not provide
for cumulative voting.
 
The Board of Directors believes that the current method of voting at
stockholders' meetings that is based on plurality of the votes cast better
serves the interests of the stockholders of Merrill Lynch as a whole. The
election of directors by plurality vote is consistent with the view that a
board of directors is accountable to stockholders generally.
 
                                      11
<PAGE>
 
In contrast, cumulative voting may enhance the ability of those seeking to
support a special interest group to elect one or more directors representing
the interests of that group. Any directors so elected may view themselves as
representatives of the special interest group that elected them and under an
obligation to represent that group's interests, regardless of whether the
furtherance of those interests would benefit all stockholders generally. This
could tend to promote adherence to more narrow interests rather than those of
stockholders at large.
 
In addition, the use of cumulative voting and the resulting election of
directors who represent particular groups of stockholders may create a risk of
promoting factionalism among members of the Board of Directors and may,
therefore, undermine their ability to work together effectively. In its
Statement on Corporate Governance, The Business Roundtable reports that the
adoption of cumulative voting is generally not recommended for large publicly-
owned corporations because of the concerns of promoting special interests and
the potential for factionalism. It is for these reasons that the Board of
Directors regards the proposed change in voting method as being contrary to
the best interests of Merrill Lynch stockholders.
 
                                      12
<PAGE>
 
               MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
                       REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERVIEW

Merrill Lynch operates in a highly competitive and dynamic industry, in which
a company's success is largely attributable to the quality of its leaders. To
attract, develop and retain the leadership needed to excel as a world-class
company in this industry, Merrill Lynch's executive compensation program is
designed to recognize individual and company results, and to reward superior
performance. The program encourages the creation of shareholder value by
linking executives' annual cash bonuses and stock bonuses to the year-to-year
change in the company's financial results.
 
POLICIES AND PROCESS
 
 GENERAL
 
The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the "MDCC") is
responsible for administering all executive officer compensation programs and
plans, including the determination and approval of base salaries, cash bonuses
and stock bonuses. The MDCC is comprised of five directors who have never been
employees of Merrill Lynch and who are not eligible to participate in any of
the MDCC-administered compensation programs or plans.
 
Each year, the MDCC conducts a broad review of Merrill Lynch's executive
compensation programs to ensure that they are aligned with Merrill Lynch's
long-term strategic and financial goals, annual financial plans, and other
short-term objectives. As part of this review, the MDCC assesses the impact of
changes in laws and regulations on the compensation programs for executive
officers. The MDCC has access to advice and counsel from independent third
parties. The MDCC also reviews executive management compensation with the
other non-employee members of the Board of Directors.
 
 TOTAL COMPENSATION
 
The three elements of total compensation for Merrill Lynch executives are base
salary, cash bonus and stock bonus. The MDCC has balanced these components of
executive pay to provide Merrill Lynch's top executives with a powerful
incentive to maximize the long-term shareholder value of Merrill Lynch.
 
 BASE SALARIES

Executive officer base salaries are typically reviewed every three to four
years based on factors determined by the MDCC at the time of review. Executive
officer salaries were not reviewed by the MDCC for 1998. As a portion of their
total annual cash compensation, the base salaries of executive officers named
in the Summary Compensation Table ranged from 7% to 13% of their total 1998
cash compensation levels (base salary plus annual bonus). This relationship of
salaries to total annual cash compensation is intended to maximize the
motivational value of the incentive compensation components of the program.
 
                                      13
<PAGE>
 
 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Merrill Lynch's incentive awards to executive officers are determined based on
a shareholder-approved performance goal formula that complies with Internal
Revenue Service regulations regarding the tax deductibility of executive
officer compensation in excess of $1 million. This formula is used to
determine the annual cash bonus and stock bonus of the Chief Executive Officer
(the "CEO") by increasing or decreasing the prior year's cash and stock bonus
formula amounts by the average year-over-year percentage change in Merrill
Lynch's Net Income and Return on Equity ("ROE"). The cash bonus and stock
bonus formula amounts for all other executive officers are established as a
percentage of the CEO's formula bonus amounts. These percentages, 80% for the
Chief Operating Officer (the "COO") and 70% for other executive officers,
reflect the relative responsibility and accountability of these individuals in
relation to that of the CEO. This approach provides an incentive for
executives to focus their efforts on achieving both a high return on
stockholders' equity and growth in profits.
 
The MDCC retains the discretion to determine actual awards that are less than
the formula amounts for each executive based on an assessment of the factors
influencing the formula and each executive's performance. Performance factors
taken into consideration include: strategic planning, quality of client
service, market share, corporate reputation, financial results, fixed expense
control, capital allocation, profit margins, compliance and risk control,
management development, workforce diversity, technology and innovation. The
MDCC also considers the extent to which individuals take a leadership role in
exemplifying and fostering Merrill Lynch's principles of Client Focus, Respect
for the Individual, Teamwork, Responsible Citizenship, and Integrity. These
factors are considered collectively by the MDCC and are not weighted in any
particular order of importance.
 
CASH BONUS. The cash bonus program provides a direct incentive for executive
officers to improve the financial performance of Merrill Lynch by varying
their formula bonus amounts with the change in Net Income and ROE. For the
1998 performance year, the MDCC determined cash bonuses for each executive
officer using the performance goal formula.
 
STOCK BONUS. The stock bonus program is a significant component of the total
compensation awarded each year to members of executive management. While the
amount of the stock bonus is based on the financial results of Merrill Lynch
for the performance year, the ultimate value of the stock bonus is dependent
on future stock price performance. As such, the stock bonus, consisting of
Restricted Units and Stock Options, aligns executive and stockholder financial
interests and encourages an appropriate balance between short-term goals and
long-term strategic planning.
 
Executive officers are also eligible to participate in broad-based plans
offered generally to Merrill Lynch employees, including retirement,
investment, health, and other employee benefit plans.
 
                                      14
<PAGE>
 
 APPROVAL PROCESS
 
Consistent with the executive compensation policies discussed above, the MDCC
assesses the performance of the CEO and all other executive officers and
recommends the annual cash and stock bonus amounts for these individuals to
the Board of Directors for approval.
 
COMPENSATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR 1998 PERFORMANCE
 
Following an examination in July of 1998 of the trend in the CEO's pay at
Merrill Lynch in relation to that of CEOs at other leading financial services
companies, the Board of Directors approved a special adjustment to the CEO's
1997 compensation formula amount to become effective with the 1998 performance
year. The adjustment was made to recognize that the compensation of Merrill
Lynch's CEO had fallen meaningfully behind the median amount provided to CEOs
at Merrill Lynch's public competitors. The approved adjustment was awarded in
the form of Stock Options to ensure that any value actually realized from this
adjustment is conditioned on future stock price appreciation.
 
The 1998 performance year cash and stock bonuses for the CEO were determined
in accordance with the performance goal formula referenced above. For 1998,
Merrill Lynch's Net Income as defined by the formula was $1,663 million.
Because the formula definition of Net Income excludes expenses related to all
unusual and non-recurring items, the Board decided to reduce Net Income for
the purpose of determining actual 1998 CEO compensation by an amount that
includes costs related to the 1998 staff reduction initiative. After this $293
million adjustment, the Net Income amount used to determine actual CEO
compensation was $1,370 million, producing a 1998 ROE of 14.9%. The average
change in this Net Income and ROE from 1997 rounded to the nearest whole
percentage point, represents a decrease of 36%. The 36% decrease applied to
the CEO's 1997 cash bonus of $7,086,439 produced an actual 1998 cash bonus of
$4,535,321.
 
Applying the same 36% decrease to the CEO's 1997 restricted stock award of
$1,657,312 produced a 1998 Restricted Unit award of $1,060,328. The actual
number of Restricted Units granted was calculated by dividing the dollar value
to be paid in Restricted Units by the average fair market value ($70.80) of a
share of Common Stock over the twenty business days preceding January 14,
1999, the date the MDCC met to review executive stock awards. Applying the 36%
formula decrease to the 1997 adjusted Stock Option award of $5,657,312
produced a 1998 Stock Option award of $3,621,032. The number of Stock Options
granted for 1998 performance was calculated by dividing the dollar value to be
paid in Stock Options by the same price of Common Stock used to determine the
Restricted Unit grant, and multiplying the result by four. The multiple of
four options to one share equivalent is used because the Black-Scholes value
of a Merrill Lynch Stock Option, taking into account the non-marketability of
employee stock options, has over time averaged approximately 25% of the value
of a share of Common Stock.
 
                                      15
<PAGE>
 
SUMMARY
 
The CEO's compensation for performance in 1998, based on the methodology
described above and valued when it was approved in January 1999, consisted of:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   SALARY     CASH BONUS     RESTRICTED UNITS*     STOCK OPTIONS*       TOTAL
   ------     ----------     -----------------     --------------     ----------
  <S>         <C>            <C>                   <C>                <C>
  $700,000    $4,535,321        $1,060,328           $3,621,032       $9,916,681
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
 
* The value of these awards is based on the average fair market value ($70.80)
  of Common Stock over twenty business days preceding January 14, 1999, the
  date the MDCC met to review the awards. These amounts differ from the
  amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table under the column headed
  "Restricted Stock Awards" and from the amounts shown in the table entitled
  Option Grants Made in Last Fiscal Year under the column headed "Grant Date
  Present Value" because the amounts in those tables are required to be based
  on the grant date Common Stock price.
 
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
ROBERT P. LUCIANO, CHAIRMAN
JILL K. CONWAY
EARLE H. HARBISON, JR.
GEORGE B. HARVEY
WILLIAM L. WEISS
 
                             ---------------------
 
          COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
 
The members of the MDCC are named above. None of these individuals has ever
been an officer or employee of Merrill Lynch or any of its subsidiaries and no
"compensation committee interlocks" existed during the 1998 fiscal year.
 
                                      16
<PAGE>
 
                   COMPENSATION TABLES AND OTHER INFORMATION
 
The following tables set forth information with respect to the Chief Executive
Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of
Merrill Lynch.
 
                          SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                LONG-TERM
                                  ANNUAL COMPENSATION    COMPENSATION AWARDS(1)
                                ------------------------ -----------------------
                                                         RESTRICTED
                                                         STOCK/UNIT  SECURITIES
                                                           AWARDS    UNDERLYING     ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION(2)  YEAR  SALARY   BONUS(1)   (3)(4)(5)  OPTIONS(6)  COMPENSATION(7)
- ------------------------------  ---- -------- ---------- ----------------------- ---------------
<S>                             <C>  <C>      <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>
David H. Komansky.......        1998 $700,000 $4,535,321 $  1,104,554   204,580     $ 35,725
 Chairman of the Board          1997  642,424  7,086,439    1,524,325    96,395       39,771
 and Chief Executive            1996  500,000  5,201,056    1,250,266   118,890       73,127 
 Officer                        
 
Herbert M. Allison, Jr..        1998 $500,000 $3,628,257 $    883,673   163,660     $ 35,350  
 President and Chief            1997  471,212  5,669,151    1,219,460   377,120       38,621
 Operating Officer              1996  400,000  4,200,000      925,039    87,970       68,607
 
John L. Steffens........        1998 $400,000 $3,385,000 $    807,341   131,355     $151,700
 Vice Chairman                  1997  400,000  4,750,000      988,724    62,525      120,634
                                1996  400,000  4,200,000      925,039    87,790      447,098
 
E. Stanley O'Neal.......        1998 $300,000 $2,830,000 $    666,700   108,475     $112,005
 Executive Vice                 1997  268,333  4,300,000      988,724    62,525       23,383
 President
 
Jeffrey M. Peek.........        1998 $210,000 $2,800,000 $    640,666   104,235     $199,645
 Executive Vice                 1997  210,000  3,840,000      965,828    40,715      162,293 
 President                      
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
 
(1) Awards were made in January or February of the succeeding fiscal year for
    performance in the year indicated.
 
(2) On April 15, 1997, Mr. Komansky became Chairman of the Board, Mr. Allison
    became President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Steffens became Vice
    Chairman, and Mr. O'Neal became an Executive Vice President. Mr. Peek
    became an Executive Vice President of Merrill Lynch effective December 10,
    1997. Mr. O'Neal became Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch effective
    March 1, 1998. No 1996 compensation information is reported for Messrs.
    O'Neal and Peek because they were not executive officers in that year.
 
(3) All awards have been valued for this table using closing prices of Common
    Stock on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System on the grant dates
    of such awards. The closing price on February 1, 1999, the effective date
    of the grants for performance in 1998, was $73.75. All Restricted Shares
    and Restricted Units vest three years following grant and all Restricted
    Shares and those Restricted Units granted in 1999 may not be transferred
    for an additional two years after vesting. Restricted Shares are shares of
    Common Stock that convey to the holder all the rights of a stockholder
    except that they are restricted from being sold, transferred, or assigned
    for a period
 
                                      17
<PAGE>
 
Footnotes to Summary Compensation Table Continued
 
    of time after they are granted. Restricted Units are similar to Restricted
    Shares but do not convey voting rights. Awards in 1999 consisted of
    Restricted Units, payable in cash or shares of Common Stock at the end of
    five years. Prior to 1999, awards were split equally between Restricted
    Shares and Restricted Units payable in cash at the end of a three-year
    vesting period.
 
(4) During the applicable vesting and/or restricted periods, dividends are
    paid on Restricted Shares and dividend equivalents are paid on Restricted
    Units. Such dividends and dividend equivalents are equal in amount to the
    dividends paid on shares of Common Stock.
 
(5) The number and value of Restricted Shares and Restricted Units held by
    executive officers named in the table as of December 25, 1998 are as
    follows: Mr. Komansky (60,648 shares and 43,846 units--$7,503,975); Mr.
    Allison (50,108 shares and 33,304 units--$5,990,024); Mr. Steffens (48,284
    shares and 31,480 units--$5,728,052); Mr. O'Neal (49,350 shares and 32,188
    units--$5,855,448); and Mr. Peek (40,413 shares and 23,249 units--
    $4,571,727). These amounts do not include Restricted Units awarded in 1999
    for performance in fiscal year 1998.
 
(6) In the case of Mr. Allison, the 1997 amount includes a grant of 300,000
    Stock Options to recognize Mr. Allison's increased accountability for
    creating shareholder value following his appointment as President and
    Chief Operating Officer on April 15, 1997.
 
(7) Amounts shown for 1998 consist of the following: (i) contributions made in
    1998 by Merrill Lynch to accounts of employees under the Merrill Lynch
    401(k) Savings & Investment Plan (including, where applicable, cash
    payments made because of limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue
    Code)--Mr. Komansky ($1,500); Mr. Allison ($1,500); Mr. Steffens ($1,500);
    and Mr. Peek ($1,500); (ii) allocations made in 1998 by Merrill Lynch to
    accounts of employees under the defined contribution retirement program--
    Mr. Komansky ($17,600); Mr. Allison ($17,600); Mr. Steffens ($19,200); Mr.
    O'Neal ($6,400); and Mr. Peek ($9,600); and (iii) distributions received
    in 1998 on investments by the named executives of their own personal funds
    in Merrill Lynch-sponsored employee partnerships--Mr. Komansky ($16,625);
    Mr. Allison ($16,250); Mr. Steffens ($131,000); Mr. O'Neal ($105,605); and
    Mr. Peek ($188,545).
 
                                      18
<PAGE>
 
               STOCK OPTION GRANTS MADE IN LAST FISCAL YEAR(/1/)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         NUMBER OF   % OF TOTAL
                         SECURITIES   OPTIONS
                         UNDERLYING  GRANTED TO  EXERCISE             GRANT DATE
                          OPTIONS   EMPLOYEES IN   PRICE   EXPIRATION  PRESENT
          NAME            GRANTED   FISCAL YEAR  PER SHARE DATE(/2/)  VALUE(/3/)
          ----           ---------- ------------ --------- ---------- ----------
<S>                      <C>        <C>          <C>       <C>        <C>
David H. Komansky.......  204,580       0.7%     $72.34375 1/25/2009  $5,144,300
Herbert M. Allison, Jr..  163,660       0.6       72.34375 1/25/2009   4,115,340 
John L. Steffens........  131,355       0.4       72.34375 1/25/2009   3,303,009
E. Stanley O'Neal.......  108,475       0.4       72.34375 1/25/2009   2,727,676
Jeffrey M. Peek.........  104,235       0.4       72.34375 1/25/2009   2,621,058
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
 
(1) Includes awards made in January 1999 for performance in 1998. Awards made
    in January 1998 for performance in 1997 are excluded (which awards, for
    Messrs. Komansky, Allison, Steffens, and O'Neal, were reflected in Merrill
    Lynch's 1998 Proxy Statement).
 
(2) All Stock Options become exercisable as follows: 20% after one year, 40%
    after two years, 60% after three years, 80% after four years, and 100%
    after five years.
 
(3) Valued using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The exercise
    price of each Stock Option ($72.34375) is equal to the average of the high
    and low prices on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System of a share
    of Common Stock on January 25, 1999, the date of grant. The assumptions
    used for the variables in the model were: 35.49% volatility (which is the
    volatility of the Common Stock for the 120 months preceding grant); a
    5.05% risk-free rate of return (which is the yield as of the date of grant
    on a U.S. Treasury Strip (zero-coupon bond) maturing in February 2009, as
    quoted in The Wall Street Journal); a 1.33% dividend yield (which was the
    dividend yield on the date of grant); and a 10-year option term (which is
    the term of the option when granted). A discount of 25% was applied to the
    option value yielded by the model to reflect the non-marketability of
    employee stock options. The actual gain that executives will realize on
    their Stock Options will depend on the future price of the Common Stock
    and cannot be accurately forecast by application of an option pricing
    model.
 
          AGGREGATED STOCK OPTION EXERCISES MADE IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
                       AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     NUMBER OF SECURITIES
                                                    UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED     VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
                                                    OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-    IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
                           SHARES                             END             AT FISCAL YEAR-END(/1/)
                         ACQUIRED ON     VALUE     ------------------------- -------------------------
          NAME            EXERCISE   REALIZED(/2/) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
          ----           ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S>                      <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>
David H. Komansky.......   220,000    $14,188,125   1,108,072     786,391    $57,994,330  $30,731,567
Herbert M. Allison, Jr.          0              0   1,275,120     541,908     76,651,882   10,427,336 
John L. Steffens........         0              0   1,128,240     227,313     66,737,260    7,340,373
E. Stanley O'Neal.......         0              0     165,800     163,917      8,530,922    4,602,376
Jeffrey M. Peek.........    32,000      2,106,998     274,592     138,823     15,535,967    4,254,692
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
 
(1) This valuation represents the difference between $71.81250, the closing
    price on December 24, 1998 on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting
    System of a share of Common Stock, and the exercise prices of these Stock
    Options.
 
(2) These valuations represent the difference between the average of the high
    and low prices on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System on the
    date of exercise of a share of Common Stock, and the exercise prices of
    the Stock Options exercised. Mr. Komansky elected to defer the gain
    received upon the exercise of certain Stock Options (net of shares
    withheld for taxes) pursuant to the Merrill Lynch Program for Deferral of
    Stock Option Gains for a Select Group of Eligible Employees and continues
    to hold 197,274 Stock Units which are payable in Common Stock.
 
                                      19
<PAGE>
 
PENSION PLAN ANNUITY
 
In 1988, the Merrill Lynch defined benefit pension plan (the "Pension Plan")
was terminated, and a group annuity contract to pay the Pension Plan benefits
to the vested participants was purchased from Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company with a portion of the terminated Pension Plan trust assets. This
annuity is payable at normal retirement (generally age 65) or at an early
retirement age in a reduced amount. Merrill Lynch participates in the
actuarial experience and investment performance of these annuity assets under
an agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
 
Under the arrangement described above, the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table will be eligible to receive an annuity upon
retirement. Those retiring at age 65 with at least 10 years of Pension Plan
participation will receive up to the annual statutory maximum applicable to
the year in which the annuity payments are made, which, during 1999, is
$121,334 (for those born between 1938 and 1954). These limits are adjusted
periodically by the Internal Revenue Service for increases in the cost of
living. The compounded annual growth rate of these cost of living increases
has been 3.2% since 1988, the year indexing began. Effective for 1995 and
later years, however, the cost of living adjustment calculation is subject to
rounding rules. The annuity payments, if payable as straight life annuities,
will not exceed the following annual amounts for the following executive
officers: Mr. Komansky ($103,655); Mr. Allison ($81,543); Mr. Steffens
($227,963); Mr. O'Neal ($5,679); and Mr. Peek ($54,825). These amounts reflect
an offset for estimated social security benefits in accordance with the
provisions of the terminated Pension Plan.
 
SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY AGREEMENT
 
Merrill Lynch has entered into an annuity agreement with Mr. Komansky,
effective January 27, 1997, to provide for supplemental defined benefit
annuity payments to him and his surviving spouse. Estimated amounts payable to
Mr. Komansky (when combined with retirement benefits from other sources
described in the paragraph below), assuming payment in the form of a straight
life annuity upon retirement at age 60 or thereafter, can be calculated using
the following table based on his highest consecutive five-year average
compensation and his years of service:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
              HIGHEST CONSECUTIVE                       YEARS OF SERVICE
                5-YEAR AVERAGE                  --------------------------------
                 COMPENSATION                       30         33         36
              -------------------               ---------- ---------- ----------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>
$3,250,000..................................... $1,218,750 $1,340,625 $1,462,500
 3,750,000.....................................  1,406,250  1,546,875  1,620,000
 4,250,000.....................................  1,593,750  1,620,000  1,620,000
 4,750,000.....................................  1,620,000  1,620,000  1,620,000
 5,250,000.....................................  1,620,000  1,620,000  1,620,000
</TABLE>
 
 
                                      20
<PAGE>
 
As of December 25, 1998, Mr. Komansky's highest consecutive five-year average
compensation was approximately $4.3 million and he had approximately 30 years
of service. The annuity is payable if Mr. Komansky retires at the age of 60 or
thereafter or dies while employed by Merrill Lynch. The annual amount of his
annuity will be equal to 1.25% of his highest consecutive five-year average
compensation (excluding stock-based compensation and certain non-recurring
cash compensation awards) multiplied by years of service up to age 65, as
reduced by Mr. Komansky's Pension Plan annuity described above and the
combined annuity value at retirement of his account balances attributable to
Merrill Lynch contributions to the Merrill Lynch 401(k) Savings & Investment
Plan and the Retirement Accumulation Plan, and to the allocations under the
ESOP and as further reduced by 50% of the annual social security retirement
benefit amount he would receive upon retirement at age 65 (computed as of his
actual retirement date if earlier than age 65). The amount of his annuity,
however, together with the combined annuity value described above, cannot
exceed $1,620,000 if payable as a straight life annuity or a 10-year certain
and life annuity, or $1,370,000 if payable as a 50% or 100% joint and survivor
life annuity, in each case subject to a semi-annual adjustment for inflation
until commencement of payment. The payment will be made monthly in the form of
a life annuity or, subject to reductions, a 10-year certain and life annuity,
or a 50% or 100% joint and survivor life annuity. The survivor benefits, if
applicable, are payable only to a spousal beneficiary.
 
SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
 
Merrill Lynch has severance agreements with certain members of executive and
senior management. These agreements provide for payments and other benefits if
there is a Change in Control (as defined below) of Merrill Lynch, and the
employee's employment is subsequently terminated by Merrill Lynch or its
successor without "Cause" or by the employee for "Good Reason", including a
detrimental change in responsibilities or a reduction in salary or benefits.
The term of each agreement does not exceed three years, which term is
automatically extended each year for an additional year until notice to the
contrary is given to the employee. Under each agreement, the employee will
receive a lump sum payment equal to the lesser of 2.99 times the employee's
average annual W-2 compensation for the five years immediately preceding the
year of the termination of employment or 2.99 times the employee's average
annual salary, bonus, and the grant value of stock-based compensation for the
five years immediately preceding the year of the termination of employment.
The employee shall also receive: (i) a lump sum payment approximating the
value of life, disability, accident, and medical insurance benefits for 24
months after termination of employment, and an amount sufficient to cover any
income taxes payable thereon; (ii) a lump sum payment equal to the retirement
contribution, and an amount sufficient to cover any income taxes payable
thereon, that the employee would have been eligible to receive from Merrill
Lynch under the terms of the Merrill Lynch retirement program (which consists
of the Retirement Accumulation Plan and the ESOP, and any applicable Merrill
Lynch contributions to the Merrill Lynch 401(k) Savings & Investment Plan, or
any successor program or plan that may be in effect at the time of the Change
in Control), such amount to be determined as if the employee were fully vested
thereunder and had continued after the date of termination to be employed for
an additional 24 months at the employee's highest annual rate of compensation
during the 12 months immediately preceding the date of termination for
purposes of determining the basic contributions and any applicable
supplemental contributions; and (iii) any legal fees and expenses incurred as
a result of the employee's termination of employment.
 
                                      21
<PAGE>
 
Under the terms of the agreements, a "Change in Control" of Merrill Lynch
means: (i) any change in control of a nature required to be reported under the
SEC's proxy rules; (ii) the acquisition by any person of the beneficial
ownership of securities representing 30% or more of the combined voting power
of Merrill Lynch's then outstanding voting securities; (iii) a change in the
composition of the Board of Directors such that, within a period of two
consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such two-year period
constituted the Board of Directors and any new directors elected or nominated
by at least 3/4 of the directors who were either directors at the beginning of
the two-year period or were so elected or nominated, cease for any reason to
constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors; or (iv) the
liquidation of all or substantially all of the assets of Merrill Lynch. In
addition, if Merrill Lynch enters into an agreement, the consummation of which
would result in a Change in Control, then a Change in Control shall be deemed
to have occurred with respect to any participant's termination without "Cause"
or for "Good Reason" occurring after the execution of such agreement and, if
such agreement expires or is terminated prior to consummation of the Change in
Control, before such expiration or termination.
 
Subject to certain limitations contained in the severance agreements, any
payments thereunder would be in addition to amounts payable under certain
stock-based plans, including the Merrill Lynch Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan, which, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in
that plan), provide for early vesting and payment if an employee is terminated
without cause or leaves for good reason.
 
                           COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
 
Those Merrill Lynch directors who are not full-time employees of Merrill Lynch
or an affiliated corporation receive monthly cash payments at a rate of
$55,000 per year in base compensation and receive transportation to meetings
or reimbursement of reasonable travel expenses incurred to attend the
meetings. In addition, non-employee directors receive $15,000 for chairing the
Audit and Finance Committee and the MDCC. The directors chairing the
Nominating Committee and the Public Policy and Responsibility Committee
receive $10,000 per year for providing this service. The other members of
committees receive no additional compensation.
 
Under the Merrill Lynch Fee Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors, non-
employee directors may defer all or a portion of their base compensation and
committee chair fees until a specified later date or until after retirement.
At the option of the participant, deferred fees (i) may be credited with a
return based on the performance of selected mutual funds (or a return based on
the performance of certain Merrill Lynch-sponsored employee partnerships), or
(ii) may be represented by Common Stock equivalents that are credited with
dividend equivalents equal to dividends declared on the Common Stock. All
distributions under the Fee Deferral Plan are payable in cash.
 
Under the Merrill Lynch Deferred Unit and Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (the "Unit Plan") non-employee directors receive grants of Deferred
Units (representing Merrill Lynch's obligation to pay an amount in cash equal
to the value of one share of Common Stock at the end of the deferral period)
and Deferred Stock Units (representing Merrill Lynch's obligation to deliver
one share of Common Stock at the end of the deferral period). Under the Unit
Plan, each non-employee director
 
                                      22
<PAGE>
 
receives an initial grant of Deferred Units and Deferred Stock Units upon
commencement of Board service and additional grants of Deferred Units and
Deferred Stock Units at the beginning of the month following the fifth Annual
Meeting subsequent to the most recent grant of Deferred Units or Deferred
Stock Units, as applicable. The Unit Plan replaced the Merrill Lynch Non-
Employee Directors' Equity Plan (the "Equity Plan"), described below.
Directors in service at the inception of the Unit Plan received their initial
Deferred Unit grants in August 1996 and receive their initial Deferred Stock
Unit grants at the beginning of the month following the date that their most
recent grants of restricted stock under the Equity Plan became fully vested.
The grant value of such grants of Deferred Units or Deferred Stock Units is
$50,000, except that grants to directors scheduled to retire prior to the
fifth Annual Meeting subsequent to grant are reduced proportionately. In
addition, commencing April 1998, each director became eligible for an annual
$10,000 grant of Deferred Units under the Unit Plan. Deferred Units and
Deferred Stock Units are payable in cash and Common Stock, respectively, at
the end of a five-year deferral period or upon earlier cessation of service
provided that payments are prorated if Board service ends prior to scheduled
retirement for any reason other than death. Participants in the Unit Plan have
the option to defer payment of Deferred Units and Deferred Stock Units, and,
in the case of Deferred Units, may choose to index their return after the
initial five-year deferral period to the performance of selected mutual funds.
Deferred Units and Deferred Stock Units are non-transferable and carry no
voting rights, but they receive dividend equivalents that are credited in the
form of additional Deferred Units or Deferred Stock Units, as applicable.
 
Under the predecessor of the Unit Plan, the Merrill Lynch Non-Employee
Directors' Equity Plan (the "Equity Plan"), each non-employee director who
commenced service prior to October 1996 received an initial grant of
restricted stock upon commencement of Board service or, in the case of
directors in service at the inception of the Equity Plan, on November 4, 1992.
The number of shares of restricted stock granted was based on a grant value of
$50,000, provided that grants to directors scheduled to retire prior to the
fifth Annual Meeting subsequent to grant were reduced proportionately.
Restricted stock granted under the Equity Plan vested and became transferable
in equal annual installments on the date of each of the five Annual Meetings
subsequent to grant (or, in the case of a director scheduled to retire
earlier, such lesser number of Annual Meetings remaining until retirement).
Unvested shares can not be transferred, assigned, pledged, or otherwise
encumbered, and are forfeited if Board service ends prior to scheduled
retirement for any reason other than death. In all other respects, holders of
restricted stock under the Equity Plan have the same rights as holders of
Common Stock, including the right to vote and receive dividends. The Equity
Plan was terminated in October 1996 and no further grants will be made
thereunder.
 
Each non-employee director who has served for five years (or has reached age
65 with at least one year of service), and who thereafter ceases to serve for
any reason other than removal for cause, is eligible to receive a pension
benefit. The beneficiary(ies) or estate of each non-employee director is
entitled to receive a death benefit in the event of such director's death
during his or her term. Both such benefits are based upon the annual base
compensation at the time of the director's cessation of service or death
(currently $55,000) plus the annual grant value of stock-based compensation
for non-employee directors at the time of the director's cessation of service
or death (currently $30,000), and the director's age and length of service.
Although the amount and method of payment of each such
 
                                      23
<PAGE>
 
benefit cannot be determined until the time of entitlement, it will not, on an
annualized basis, exceed an amount equal to the sum of the annual base
compensation for non-employee directors at the time of the director's
cessation of service or death plus the annual grant value of stock-based
compensation for non-employee directors at the time of the director's
cessation of service or death.
 
Merrill Lynch offers comprehensive medical insurance benefits to non-employee
directors and eligible family members, which are comparable to those offered
to Merrill Lynch employees generally except that these benefits are provided
on a non-contributory basis and with differences in deductible, coinsurance,
and lifetime benefits. Merrill Lynch also offers life and business travel
insurance benefits to non-employee directors.
 
From time to time, non-employee directors are offered the option of investing
their own personal funds in certain Merrill Lynch-sponsored employee
partnerships. The distributions on such investments received in 1998 by
persons who were non-employee directors participating during 1998 were as
follows: Earle H. Harbison, Jr. ($45,000) and Aulana L. Peters ($2,400).
 
                             CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
 
Since the beginning of the 1998 fiscal year, certain directors and executive
officers of Merrill Lynch and associates of such persons were, from time to
time, indebted to Merrill Lynch as customers in connection with margin account
loans, mortgage loans, revolving lines of credit, and other extensions of
credit by Merrill Lynch's subsidiaries. These transactions were in the
ordinary course of business and they were substantially on the same terms
(including as to interest rates and collateral provisions) as those prevailing
at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, except that for
some credit products, the interest rates charged were the same as the lowest
of the interest rates charged to other persons or were the same as those
charged to Merrill Lynch employees. In addition, these transactions did not
involve more than the normal risk of collectibility and did not present other
unfavorable features. Directors, officers, and employees of Merrill Lynch are
entitled to receive certain discounts or waivers of fees or commissions for
products and services offered by subsidiaries of Merrill Lynch.
 
From time to time since the beginning of the 1998 fiscal year, Merrill Lynch
and certain of its subsidiaries have engaged in transactions in the ordinary
course of business with the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock, State Street and certain of its
affiliates. Such transactions were on substantially the same terms as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons.
 
Since the beginning of the 1998 fiscal year, Merrill Lynch, through certain of
its subsidiaries, has from time to time performed, in the ordinary course of
its business, investment banking, financial advisory, and other services for
certain corporations with which certain of its directors are affiliated.
 
From time to time since the beginning of the 1998 fiscal year, legal services
were performed by the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher for business
activities of, and litigation matters on behalf of, Merrill Lynch and its
affiliates and for mutual funds advised by affiliates of Merrill Lynch. Aulana
L. Peters, a director, is a partner of this law firm.
 
                                      24
<PAGE>
 
In each of the following stockholder derivative actions, damages in an
unspecified amount are sought on behalf of Merrill Lynch.
 
The current directors have been named as defendants in a stockholder
derivative action commenced on October 13, 1998, purportedly brought on behalf
of Merrill Lynch in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York
County. The action alleges, among other things, that the defendants breached
their fiduciary duties in that they allegedly failed to prevent Merrill Lynch
from engaging in excessively risky business transactions with hedge funds.
 
In stockholder derivative actions, commenced October 11, 1991 and now
consolidated, purportedly brought on behalf of Merrill Lynch in the Supreme
Court of the State of New York, New York County, all current directors who
were also directors at the time of the transactions described in this
paragraph have been named as defendants. The plaintiffs allege, among other
things, breach of fiduciary duties in connection with a series of year-end
securities transactions between subsidiaries of Merrill Lynch and Guarantee
Security Life Insurance Company during the period from 1984 to 1988. On
January 5, 1999, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate
Division, reversed a lower court dismissal of this action.
 
                                      25
<PAGE>
 
                               PERFORMANCE GRAPH
 
The following performance graph compares the performance of the Common Stock
for Merrill Lynch's last five fiscal years to that of the S&P 500 Index, the
S&P Financial Index, and an index based on the common stock of the following
nine companies: A.G. Edwards, Inc., Bankers Trust New York Corporation, The
Bear Stearns Companies Inc., The Charles Schwab Corporation, Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter & Co., J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Holdings
Inc., Paine Webber Group Inc., and Citigroup Inc.* (the "Peer Group"). The
graph assumes that the value of the investment in Common Stock and each of the
three named indexes was $100 at December 31, 1993, and that all dividends were
re-invested. Points on the graph represent the performance as of the last
Friday in December of the specified year, the day of Merrill Lynch's fiscal
year-end. Stock price performances shown on the graph are not necessarily
indicative of future price performances.
 
                             [GRAPH APPEARS HERE]
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         1993         1994         1995         1996         1997         1998
                         ----         ----         ----         ----         ----         ----
<S>                      <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Merrill Lynch      100           87          127          214          348          374
      S&P 500 Index      100          101          139          174          219          288
S&P Financial Index      100           97          148          204          277          320
        Peer Group*      100           85          135          194          296          350
</TABLE>
- --------------------
* In 1998, Travelers Group Inc., which was part of the Peer Group, merged with
  Citicorp, which had not previously been part of the Peer Group, to form
  Citigroup Inc.
 
                                       26
<PAGE>
 
                                 OTHER MATTERS
 
The Board of Directors knows of no business that will be presented for
consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those items stated in the
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Should any other matters properly
come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, shares represented
by the enclosed form of proxy, if signed and returned, will be voted in
accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.
 
               STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2000 ANNUAL MEETING
 
In accordance with the rules of the SEC, stockholder proposals intended to be
presented at the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Merrill Lynch must be
received by Merrill Lynch at its principal executive offices not later than
November 8, 1999 in order to be included in Merrill Lynch's Proxy Statement
and form of proxy relating to that meeting.
 
The persons named as proxies for the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will
generally have discretionary authority to vote on any matter presented by a
stockholder for action at the meeting. In the event that Merrill Lynch
receives notice of (i) a nomination for the election of a director at least 50
and no more than 75 days prior to the Annual Meeting or (ii) any other type of
stockholder proposal at least 50 days prior to the Annual Meeting, then, so
long as Merrill Lynch includes in its proxy statement advice on the nature of
the matter and how the named proxies intend to vote the shares for which they
have received discretionary authority, such proxies may exercise discretionary
authority with respect to such matter, except to the extent limited by the
SEC's rules governing shareholder proposals.
 
                                    By Order of the Board of Directors
 
                                            ANDREA L. DULBERG
                                                Secretary
 
                                      27
<PAGE>
 
[LOGO] Merrill Lynch

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
World Financial Center
North Tower
New York, NY 10281-1332



www.ml.com
<PAGE>
 
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.           PROXY          ANNUAL MEETING-APRIL 14, 1999

              PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Herbert M. Allison, Jr., Stephen L. Hammerman
and E. Stanley O'Neal, and each of them individually, as proxies, with power of
substitution, to vote, as specified herein, all the shares of Common Stock of
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of
business                                on February 24, 1999, at the Annual     
                                        Meeting of Stockholders to be held on   
                                        April 14, 1999, and at any adjournment  
                                        thereof and, in their discretion, upon  
                                        other matters that properly may come    
                                        before the meeting. THE SHARES          
                                        REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED 
                                        IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN ON
                                        THE REVERSE OF THIS CARD. IF THIS PROXY 
                                        IS SIGNED AND RETURNED WITHOUT SPECIFIC 
                                        INSTRUCTIONS AS TO ANY ITEM OR ALL      
                                        ITEMS, IT WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION
                                        OF 5 DIRECTORS AND AGAINST THE          
                                        STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL. THE UNDERSIGNED   
                                        HEREBY REVOKES ANY PROXY HERETOFORE     
                                        GIVEN IN RESPECT OF THE SAME SHARES OF  
                                        STOCK.  

_____________________________________________   _________________________
        (Signature of Stockholder)                       (Date)

_____________________________________________   _________________________
        (Signature of Stockholder)                       (Date)

   PLEASE VOTE ON THE REVERSE OF THIS CARD. Sign, date and return this card
promptly using the enclosed envelope. Sign exactly as name appears above. Each
 joint tenant should sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, etc., give full 
                                    title.
<PAGE>
 
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
===================================================================================================================================
             THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR                      THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
                            PROPOSAL (1).                                                 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL (2).
===================================================================================================================================
<S>                                                                     <C> 
   (1) The election to the Board of Directors of the 5 nominees           (2) Institute cumulative voting    FOR   AGAINST  ABSTAIN
       named below for a term of 3 years                                                                     [ ]     [ ]     [ ]

[ ] FOR all nominees listed           [ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
    (except as marked to the              to vote for all
    contrary below)                       nominees listed

        Jill K. Conway, George B. Harvey, David H. Komansky,
               John L. Steffens and William L. Weiss

INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ONE OR MORE
INDIVIDUAL NOMINEES, WRITE THE NAME(S) OF SUCH PERSON(S) HERE:        __________________________________________________________
                                                 (To be signed on the other side)
</TABLE> 


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission