<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
-------------------
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from to
------------ ------------
Commission File Number 1-5492-1
--------
NASHUA CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware 02-0170100
- ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
(State of incorporation) I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
44 Franklin Street
P.O. Box 2002
Nashua, New Hampshire 03061-2002
- ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (603) 880-2323
---------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
------------------- ---------------------
Common Stock, par value $1.00 New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.(X)
Continued
<PAGE> 2
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----- -----
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of March 12, 1997 was approximately $82,790,000. The number of
shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of March 12, 1997 was
6,623,225 (excluding 24,030 shares held in treasury).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement dated March 25, 1997 for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 1997 are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this report.
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
- ------- --------
GENERAL
- -------
Nashua Corporation conducts business in three segments: The Commercial
Products Group, the Photo Group and Cerion Technologies Inc. ("Cerion").
Consolidated sales for 1996 were $389.7 million. Foreign sales and export sales
from the United States totaled $123.5 million and represented 31.7 percent of
the Company's total sales in fiscal 1996.
Nashua was incorporated in Massachusetts in 1904 and changed its state of
incorporation to Delaware in 1957. The Company has its principal executive
offices at 44 Franklin Street, P.O. Box 2002, Nashua, New Hampshire 03061-2002
(Telephone: (603) 880-2323). References to the "Company" or to "Nashua" refer to
Nashua Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context
otherwise requires.
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company completed the sale of its
Tape Products Division. The Company received $28 million for the net assets of
the business resulting in an after tax gain of $8.4 million. The results of the
Tape Products Division's operations and the gain on the sale are reported as a
discontinued operation. Also during 1996, the Company recorded an after tax
charge of $1.3 million associated with the extinguishment of debt.
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company and Cerion completed the
initial public offering of common stock of Cerion at a price of $13.00 per
share. A total of 4,416,000 shares were sold, of which 1,615,000 were sold by
Cerion and 2,801,000 were sold by the Company. The Company received net proceeds
of $33.1 million and recorded a $32 million pretax gain on its sale of Cerion
shares and a $7.3 million pretax gain from the Company's interest in the shares
sold by Cerion. As a result of the sale, the Company's ownership of Cerion was
reduced to 37.1 percent, and accordingly, the Company no longer consolidates the
results of Cerion and has accounted for its remaining interest under the equity
method of accounting since the completion of the initial public stock offering.
On March 1, 1996, Cerion distributed a dividend to Nashua in the form of a
promissory note payable to the Company in the principal sum of $10 million
bearing interest at the rate of 7.32 percent per annum from March 1, 1996 to
September 30, 1996. The promissory note was repaid on May 31, 1996.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company completed the sale of its
mainland European photo business. The Company received proceeds of approximately
$7 million and recorded a pretax loss of $1.7 million. During the second quarter
of 1996, the Company recorded a $7 million charge in the mainland European photo
business to write-down the value of its goodwill.
The Company recorded net restructuring and other unusual charges of $7.2
million in 1996 including a $7 million charge in the second quarter for the
write-down of goodwill in the mainland European photo business, a $1.7 million
net pretax loss on the sale of that business in the fourth quarter, $1.2 million
for the cost of divesting the organic photoconductor ("OPC") drum product line,
and $1.3 million and $.2 million for other business unit and functional
realignments in Corporate and the Photo Group, respectively. These charges were
partially offset by $4.2 million of income associated with reassessments in 1996
of certain charges recorded in 1995 for product and channel rationalizations in
the Commercial Products Group.
-2-
<PAGE> 4
During 1996, the Company renegotiated its unsecured $75 million revolving
credit facility and its senior note agreement. Since September 29, 1995, the
Company had not been in compliance with certain financial covenants and the
lenders provided the Company with a forbearance during which time the parties
negotiated amendments to the lending agreements in order to allow the Company to
remain in compliance. As a result of the 1996 negotiations, the revolving credit
facility was replaced by a bank facility (the "Bank Facility"). The Bank
Facility designated $48 million that was outstanding under the previous
revolving credit facility as a term loan with the remainder as outstanding under
a new revolving credit facility. The Bank Facility has a total of $10 million of
credit available under its revolving credit facility, of which $5 million is
available exclusively for letters of credit. At December 31, 1996, the Company
was obligated under approximately $3.7 million in standby letters of credit.
Interest on amounts outstanding under this Bank Facility is payable at prime
rate plus .5 percent. The revised senior note agreement increased the interest
rate from 9.67 percent to 11.85 percent per annum. The Bank Facility requires a
commitment fee of .5 percent per annum on unused amounts, as well as a 2 percent
per annum fee on letters of credit.
As a result of the Cerion stock offering, the Tape Products Division sale
and the sale of the mainland European photo business, the term loan portion of
the Bank Facility and the revised senior notes were repaid during 1996, and as
of December 31, 1996, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit
facility portion of the Bank Facility, which expires on December 31, 1997.
Borrowings under the Bank Facility are collateralized by a security
interest in the Company's receivables and inventory, assets of the domestic and
certain foreign subsidiaries and the stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. The
agreements contain certain financial covenants with respect to tangible net
worth, capital expenditures, cash flows and the ratio of cash flows to fixed
charges. In addition, without prior consent of the lenders, the agreement does
not allow the payment of dividends and restricts, among other things, the
incurrence of additional debt, guarantees, lease arrangements or the sale of
certain assets. As of December 31, 1996, the Company was in compliance with
these covenants.
The Note entitled "Information About Operations" in the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements, which appears on page 33 of this Form 10-K,
contains financial information concerning Nashua's business segments.
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this
report, the words "expects," "believes," "can," "will" or similar expressions
are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual
results to differ materially from those anticipated. Such risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in customer demand,
intensity of competition from other vendors, timing and acceptance of new
product introductions, and general economic and industry conditions. For
additional discussion of factors that may affect the Company's performance,
refer to Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K and those described from time to time
in the Company's other filings with the Securities Exchange Commission, press
releases and other communications.
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS GROUP
- -------------------------
The Commercial Products Group has three divisions: Imaging Supplies,
Specialty Coated Products and Label Products.
-3-
<PAGE> 5
IMAGING SUPPLIES The Imaging Supplies Division manufactures and sells a
variety of consumable products used in the process of reproducing and
transferring readable images. Nashua's imaging supplies are comprised of toners,
developers, remanufactured laser printer cartridges, facsimile paper and copy
paper. The Imaging Supplies Division sales were approximately $98 million for
1996, $137 million for 1995 and $143 million for 1994.
Nashua markets its toners, developers, facsimile paper, copy paper and
remanufactured laser printer cartridges to its national and government accounts
through a network of approximately 150 dealers located throughout the United
States. These dealers also purchase Nashua's imaging supplies for resale
directly to end-users. The Company also sells certain of these products through
its own sales force to office supply distributors, and to original equipment
manufacturers and private label distributors.
Nashua's competitors for toners and developers include Xerox Corporation,
Canon, Inc., Ricoh Corporation and Eastman Kodak Company, which sell supplies
for use in machines manufactured by them. The Company also competes with other
smaller independent manufacturers of toner and developer products. This market
segment is competitive, with more sophisticated toner formulas and shorter
copier machine life cycles requiring timely product development and marketing.
The Division's primary competitor for its remanufactured laser printer
cartridges is Canon, Inc. which manufactures both new and remanufactured laser
printer cartridges principally for sale to large original equipment
manufacturers, including Hewlett Packard Company, for resale under their brand
names. In addition, there are approximately 4,000 small laser printer cartridge
rechargers who provide low volumes to small customers.
SPECIALTY COATED PRODUCTS The Specialty Coated Products Division
manufactures and sells thermal and non-thermal, thermosensitive label,
Davac[Registered Trademark] dry-gummed label and carbonless papers. Specialty
Coated Products Division sales were approximately $46 million for 1996, $54
million for 1995 and $62 million for 1994.
Thermal papers develop an image upon contact with either a heated stylus or
a thermal print head. Thermal papers are used in point of sale printers,
airline and package identification systems, gaming and ticketing systems,
medical and industrial recording charts and for conversion to labels. Another
application for these papers is for use in thermal facsimile machines. The
Division's competitors include major integrated companies such as Appleton
Papers, Inc., Kanzaki Paper Mfg. Co., Ltd., Jujo Paper Co., Ltd. and Ricoh
Corporation, as well as several other manufacturers in Japan and Europe.
The Division's thermosensitive label papers are coated with an adhesive
that is activated when heat is applied. These products are usually sold through
fine paper merchants who, in turn, resell these products to printers who convert
the papers into labels for use primarily in the pharmaceutical industry. The
Division's thermosensitive label papers are also used in the bakery industry and
the meat packaging industry.
Davac[Registered Trademark] dry-gummed label paper is a paper which is
coated with a moisture-activated adhesive. Davac[Registered Trademark]
dry-gummed label paper is sold primarily to fine paper merchants and business
forms manufacturers. It is ultimately converted into various types of labels
and stamps.
Competitors in the thermosensitive and dry-gummed label industries include
Brown-Bridge Company (a division of Spinnaker Industries, Inc.) and Ivex
Corporation.
-4-
<PAGE> 6
Carbonless paper is a coated paper used in the production of multi-part
business forms which produce multiple copies without carbon paper. The product
is sold in sheet form through fine paper merchants and in roll form directly to
the printing industry, where it is converted into multi-part business forms.
Within the carbonless paper market, Nashua generally competes with large
integrated manufacturers including Appleton Papers, Inc., The Mead Corporation
and Imation Corporation.
LABEL PRODUCTS The Label Products Division sells pressure sensitive
labels through distributors and directly to end-users. Significant uses of
labels include grocery scale marking, inventory control and address labels. The
Label Products Division is a major supplier of labels to the supermarket
industry and labels for use in the distribution and manufacture of products. The
label industry is price sensitive and competitive, and includes competitors such
as Moore, Rittenhouse, Hobart, Avery Dennison Corporation and Uarco, Inc. plus
numerous small regional converters. A majority of the pressure-sensitive,
thermal and non-thermal roll stock used by the Label Division is manufactured by
Nashua's Specialty Coated Products Division. Label Division sales were
approximately $55 million for 1996, $54 million for 1995 and $54 million for
1994.
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS Success of the Commercial Products Group
depends in part on its continued ability to develop and market new products.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop and introduce
new products in a timely manner or that such products, if developed, will
achieve market acceptance. In addition, the Group's growth is dependent on its
ability to penetrate new markets and sell through alternative channels of
distribution. There can be no assurance that the markets being served by the
Commercial Products Group will continue to grow; that existing and new products
will meet the requirements of such markets; that the Group's products will
achieve customer acceptance in such markets; that competitors will not force
prices to an unacceptably low level or take market share from the Commercial
Products Group; or that the Group can achieve or maintain profits in these
markets.
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS The Commercial Products Group depends on outside
suppliers for most of the raw materials used to produce toners and developers,
labels and label papers, carbonless papers and thermal papers, including paper
to be converted and chemicals to be used in producing the various coatings
Nashua applies. The Group purchases these materials from several suppliers and
believes that adequate supplies are available. Products purchased in finished
form (including certain toners, developers and papers) are readily available
from a variety of sources. There are no assurances that the Group's operating
results will not be adversely affected, however, by future increases in cost of
raw materials or sourced products.
MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS The Commercial Products Group operates
manufacturing facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire; Merrimack, New Hampshire;
Omaha, Nebraska; and Nogales, Mexico. All of these sites are unionized, except
for the Nogales, Mexico plant. There can be no assurance that future operating
results will not be adversely affected by labor, political and regulatory risks
in Mexico, or changes in labor wage rates or productivity.
PHOTO GROUP
- -----------
The Photo Group traditionally has provided mail-order photo services to
amateur photographers under the tradenames York Photo Labs in the United
States, Truprint and York Photo Labs in the United Kingdom and Scot Foto and
York Photo in Canada. Through an acquisition in 1995, Nashua entered the
wholesale
-5-
<PAGE> 7
photo business in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, using the
Belmont tradename. The Photo Group develops and prints films received by mail
at its processing facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom and
Canada, and also sells film, cameras and associated products to its base of
customers. The wholesale business consists of a major processing facility in
Northern Ireland where film is received directly from retailers, processed and
returned the following day, and the operation of minilabs through contracts
with retailers. The Photo Group is the market leader in the mail-order photo
business in all three countries and is the wholesale business market leader in
Northern Ireland.
In both the mail-order and wholesale businesses, demand is strongest during
the third quarter due to increased picture-taking by amateur photographers
during the summer months.
In November 1996, the Company sold its mainland European photo business
which provided photo services in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain.
These mainland European businesses, along with a film-processing operation in
Northern Ireland, were purchased by the Company in January, 1995. The Company
believes that the sale of the mainland European business will enable the
Company to concentrate on the opportunities in the North American and United
Kingdom-based photo markets.
COMPETITORS The Photo Group's major competitors include District Photo,
Inc., Mystic Color Labs Inc. and Seattle FilmWorks, Inc. in the United States,
Grunwick Processing Laboratories Limited in the United Kingdom, Chas. Abel Photo
Services, Ltd. in Canada, as well as numerous other national, regional and local
processors in countries in which the Company operates. The proliferation of
mini-labs, discount stores and mass merchandisers offering reduced price
processing could adversely impact the mail-order segment of the photo market.
REGULATION The Photo Group's direct mail operations are subject to
regulation by the national and local government agencies with jurisdiction over
the areas in which they operate. In general, these regulations govern the manner
in which orders may be solicited, the form and content of advertisements,
information which must be provided to prospective customers, the time within
which orders must be filled, obligations to customers if orders are not shipped
within a specified period of time and the time within which refunds must be paid
if the ordered merchandise is unavailable or if it is returned. From time to
time the Photo businesses have modified their methods of doing business and
marketing operations in response to inquiries and requests from regulatory
authorities. To date, such changes have not had an adverse effect on the
businesses. However, there can be no assurance that future regulatory
requirements or actions will not have an adverse effect on the Photo businesses'
marketing programs or operations.
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT Although the Photo Group's businesses are
continually developing new marketing programs and new production techniques,
there can be no assurance that the businesses will be able to anticipate
technological advances within the photography industry. For example, digital
imaging systems are currently being developed within the industry. To the extent
the industry was to move toward this new technology and the Photo Group's
businesses were unable to adapt to this change, their results of operations
and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIERS The principal supplies and materials used by the
Photo Group's businesses include color print paper, photo developing chemicals
and color print films, all of which are available from several manufacturers.
Sales of the Photo Group's products and services on a direct-to-consumer mail-
-6-
<PAGE> 8
order basis are largely dependent on national postal services for receipt of
orders and delivery of processed film or other products. Any significant changes
in the operations or rates of these postal services or extended interruptions in
postal deliveries could have an adverse effect on the Photo operations.
CERION TECHNOLOGIES
- -------------------
Cerion, based in Champaign, Illinois, manufactures and markets
precision-machined aluminum disk substrates that are used in the production of
magnetic thin-film disks for hard disk drives of portable and desktop computers.
On May 23, 1996, the Company and Cerion completed an initial public offering of
common stock of Cerion. As a result of the offering, the Company's ownership of
Cerion was reduced to 37.1 percent and, accordingly, no longer consolidates the
results of Cerion and accounts for its remaining interest under the equity
method of accounting.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
- ------------------------
Nashua's research and development efforts have been instrumental in the
development of many of the products it markets. Nashua's research and
development expenditures were $9.6 million in 1996, $9.2 million in 1995 and
$9.1 million in 1994.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
- ---------------------
The Company (and its competitors) are subject to various environmental laws
and regulations. These include the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act ("CERCLA"), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
("RCRA"), the Clean Water Act and other state and local counterparts of these
statutes. The Company believes that its operations have been and continue to be
operating in compliance in all material respects with applicable environmental
laws and regulations. (Violation of these laws and regulations could result in
substantial fines and penalties.) Nevertheless, in the past and potentially in
the future, the Company has and could receive notices of alleged environmental
violations. The Company has endeavored to promptly remedy any such violations
upon notification.
For the past three years, the Company has spent approximately $1 million
per year for compliance with pertinent environmental laws and regulations. In
addition, for those sites which the Company has received notification of the
need to remediate, the Company has assessed its liability and has established a
reserve for estimated costs associated therewith. At December 31, 1996 the
reserve for potential environmental liabilities was $1.6 million. Liability of
"potentially responsible parties" (PRP) under CERCLA and RCRA, however, is joint
and several, and actual remediation expenses at sites where the Company is a PRP
may exceed current estimates. The Company believes that based on the facts
currently known and the environmental reserve recorded, its remediation expense
with respect to those sites and on-going costs of compliance are not likely to
have a material adverse effect on its liquidity, consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
-7-
<PAGE> 9
EMPLOYEES
- ---------
Nashua and its subsidiaries had approximately 2,340 full-time employees at
March 1, 1997. Approximately 500 employees of Nashua's Commercial Products Group
segment are members of one of several unions, principally the United
Paperworkers International Union. There are three agreements with the United
Paperworkers International Union covering a majority of the Commercial Products
Group's hourly employees. These agreements generally have a duration of two
years and expiration dates in the first quarter of the respective year.
FOREIGN OPERATIONS
- ------------------
During 1996, Nashua's Photo Group had subsidiaries and/or branches in
Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Belgium, Spain and the Netherlands.
In November 1996, in respect to the mainland European photo business sale,
Nashua sold substantially all of the assets of the foreign subsidiaries
operating in France, Belgium, Spain and the Netherlands. Nashua had export
sales of approximately $30.5 million in 1996, $36.4 million in 1995 and $33.1
million in 1994.
Nashua includes revenues and other financial data from its foreign
operations in its business segment reporting according to the nature of the
product sold. The Note to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
entitled "Information About Operations," which appears on page 33 of this Form
10-K, contains additional information regarding Nashua's foreign operations
during the last three years, including identifiable assets, net sales and income
(loss) from continuing operations by geographic area.
Nashua's international sales are subject to risks that generally do not
affect businesses operating wholly within a single country. These include
political risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, exchange
control and import limitations which may impede the free movement of goods and
funds from one country to another and currency exchange rate risks. Nashua's
results generally are adversely affected as the United States dollar strengthens
against the foreign currencies of the countries in which it does business. From
time-to-time Nashua enters into various foreign exchange contracts to mitigate
the risk of foreign currency fluctuations with respect to foreign currency
denominated transactions.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
- ------- ----------
Nashua's manufacturing facilities are located in the United States, Canada,
the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and Mexico. Nashua considers its properties
to be in good operating condition and suitable for the production of its
products.
The principal manufacturing facilities of the Company are listed by
industry segment, location and principal products produced. Except as otherwise
noted, each of these facilities is owned by the Company.
-8-
<PAGE> 10
<TABLE>
PRINCIPAL PROPERTIES
--------------------
<CAPTION>
SQUARE PRINCIPAL
LOCATION FOOTAGE PRODUCTS PRODUCED
- -------- ------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
- -------------------
Merrimack, New Hampshire 435,000 carbonless paper, facsimile paper,
thermosensitive and dry-gummed label
papers, chemicals
Omaha, Nebraska 170,000 pressure-sensitive labels and laminate
paper
Nashua, New Hampshire 198,000 dry toners and developers, chemicals
Chelmsford, Massachusetts 35,000 (1) liquid toners
Nogales, Mexico 55,000 (1) laser printer cartridges
PHOTO
- -----
Parkersburg, West Virginia 81,000 (1) photofinishing
Newton Abbot, United Kingdom 46,000 (1) photofinishing
Telford, United Kingdom 38,000 (1) photofinishing
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada 15,000 photofinishing
Deal, United Kingdom 12,000 (1) photofinishing
Belfast, Northern Ireland 24,000 (1) photofinishing
<FN>
- -------------
(1) Leased facilities.
</TABLE>
-9-
<PAGE> 11
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- ------- -----------------
In April 1994, Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Ricoh Corporation ("Ricoh") filed a
Complaint with the United States District Court, District of New Hampshire,
alleging the Company's infringement of the U.S. patents 4,611,730 and 4,878,603
relating to certain toner cartridges for Ricoh copiers. The Complaint seeks
damages and injunctive relief. The case was tried in the second quarter of 1996.
The Company believes it has substantial defenses but it cannot predict the
outcome. Ricoh alleged that its damages, if it were successful on the merits,
would be approximately $10 million as of the date of the trial, and the Company
alleged that even if Ricoh were to prevail that such damages should be in the
range of $.1 million to $.4 million. Ricoh also is seeking treble damages and
attorneys' fees for willful infringement, but the Company believes an award for
such damages is unlikely. The Company is awaiting the Court's decision.
On August 8, 1996, an individual plaintiff, Joshua Teitelbaum, initiated a
lawsuit against the Company, Cerion, William Blair & Co., and certain officers
and directors of Cerion in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. The
action purports to be on behalf of a class consisting of all persons (other
than the defendants) who purchased the common stock of Cerion between May 24,
1996 and July 9, 1996. The complaint alleges that, in connection with the
Cerion initial public offering, the defendants issued certain materially false
and misleading statements and omitted the disclosure of material facts
regarding, in particular, certain significant customer relationships. The
complaint alleges that the defendants violated sections 11, 12 and 13 of the
1933 Securities Act and sections 12 and 13 of the Illinois Blue Sky Law. The
complaint seeks a declaration that the case may proceed as a class action,
damages, rescission of the sale of Cerion common stock by Cerion and the
Company, costs, attorney fees and other relief on behalf of the individual
plaintiff and the class. The Company believes the lawsuit to be without merit
and intends to vigorously defend against this action.
On September 4, 1996, an individual plaintiff, Philippe Olczyk, initiated a
lawsuit against the Company, Cerion, William Blair & Co., and certain officers
and directors of Cerion in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. The
action purports to be on behalf of a class consisting of all persons (other
than the defendants) who purchased the common stock of Cerion between May 24,
1996 and July 9, 1996. The complaint alleges that, in connection with the
Cerion initial public offering, the defendants issued certain materially false
and misleading statements and omitted the disclosure of material facts
regarding, in particular, certain significant customer relationships. The
complaint alleges that the defendants violated the Illinois Blue Sky Law and
the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act. The complaint seeks
declarations that the case may be maintained as a class action and that the
defendants violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, actual and punitive
damages, costs, attorneys fees, appointment of a trustee, and other relief. The
Company believes the lawsuit to be without merit and intends to vigorously
defend against this action.
During 1994, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed an examination of
the Company's corporate income tax returns for the years 1988 through 1991. As a
result of the IRS' findings, the Company agreed to and paid additional taxes and
interest of $7.8 million in January 1995 in connection with adjustments related
mainly to the tax treatment of certain items associated with the 1990 sale of
the International Office Systems business. On January 13, 1995, the IRS issued a
Notice of Proposed Adjustment in the amount of $8.7 million in connection with
the tax years 1990 and 1991 relating to the tax treatment of income recognized
in connection with the 1990 sale of the International Office Systems business.
The Company disagreed with the position taken by the IRS and filed a formal
protest of the proposed adjustment on February 9, 1995. On November 25, 1996,
the IRS and the Company reached an agreement in connection with the tax years
1990 and 1991 in which the Company agreed to an
-10-
<PAGE> 12
additional tax payment before interest in the amount of $.5 million for 1990 and
a tax refund before interest in the amount of $.4 million for 1991. On February
4, 1997, the Company received a payment from the IRS in the amount of $.4
million in connection with the settlement of 1991. On February 3, 1997, the IRS
issued the Company an assessment in the amount of $2.5 million, of which $.5
million represents agreed taxes due and $2 million represents interest on such
taxes. The Company disagrees with the interest portion of the amount and intends
to challenge such assessment. In management's opinion, the ultimate disposition
of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position
or results of operations of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
- ------- ---------------------------------------------------
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
- ------------------------------------
<TABLE>
Set forth below are the present executive officers of the Company for
Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act purposes, their ages and their
positions held with the Company Inc.:
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Gerald G. Garbacz 60 President and Chief Executive Officer
Daniel M. Junius 44 Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Robin J.T. Clabburn 60 Vice President and Chief Technical Officer
Paul Buffum 52 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Bruce T. Wright 47 Vice President
Michael D. Jeans 48 Vice President
Charles E. Turnbull 45 Vice President
</TABLE>
Mr. Garbacz has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Nashua since
January 1996. He was a private investor from 1994 through 1995. He was Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Baker & Taylor Inc. (information distribution)
from 1992 to 1994 and Executive Vice President of W.R. Grace & Co. from prior to
1991 to 1992. He is also a Director of Handy & Harman Inc. and Chairman of the
Board of Cerion Technologies Inc.
Mr. Junius has been Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer since November 1995. He was Vice President-Finance and Treasurer from
September 1995 to November 1995. Prior to September 1995 he was Treasurer. He
is also a Director of Cerion Technologies Inc.
Mr. Clabburn has been Vice President and Chief Technical Officer since
October 1995. He worked as a consultant for Nashua from March 1994 to October
1995. Prior to March 1994 he was Chief Executive Officer for several development
stage companies at Cookson Group PLC, a manufacturer of specialty material,
chemical and precious metals.
Mr. Buffum has been Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since May
1996. Prior to May 1996 he was Secretary and Counsel.
Mr. Wright has been Vice President since October 1994. Prior to October
1994 he was Vice President of Barry Controls, (a division of Applied Power
Inc.) a custom manufacturer of vibration and control systems. From 1990 to 1993
he was a Senior Group Personnel Manager at Digital Equipment Corporation.
-11-
<PAGE> 13
Mr. Jeans has been Vice President since April 1996. Prior to April 1996 he
was President of Wesson-Peter Pan Foods, Inc. (a division of Conagra) a foods
processor. From 1990 to 1993 he was a Senior Vice President-Sales and Marketing
of H.P. Hood Inc. (a dairy products producer).
Mr. Turnbull has been Vice President since August 1995. Prior to August
1995 he was President of Polyken Technologies (a division of Tyco International
Ltd.), a manufacturer of tapes and industrial adhesives. He was a Vice
President/General Manager of Avery Dennison Corporation's Marketing Films
Division, a manufacturer of self-adhesive PVC films, from 1991 to 1993.
Executive officers are generally elected to their offices each year by the
Board of Directors shortly after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
- ------- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference is made to the Note entitled "Quarterly Operating Results and
Common Stock Information (Unaudited)" to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, which appears on page 34 of this Form 10-K.
-12-
<PAGE> 14
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
- ------- -----------------------
<TABLE>
Five Year Financial Review
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share data,
price range, number of employees and percentages) 1996(1) 1995 1994 1993 1992
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operations
Net sales $389,742 $452,196 $418,903 $427,601 $439,540
Gross margin percentage(2) 26.5% 24.3% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0%
Selling, distribution and administrative
expenses as a percentage of sales(2) 24.4% 22.0% 19.8% 20.0% 20.6%
Income (loss) before interest expense and
taxes as a percentage of sales(3) 8.1% (3.2)% 1.5% 0.6% 4.1%
Income (loss) before taxes as a percentage of sales(3) 7.3% (4.5)% 1.0% 0.1% 3.5%
Income (loss) as a percentage of sales(3) 4.2% (3.4)% 0.5% 0.1% 2.0%
Effective tax rate 42.4% (23.2)% 45.2% 56.0% 42.7%
Income (loss) before income taxes(3) $ 28,634 $(20,149) $ 4,031 $ 565 $ 15,275
Income (loss) after taxes(3) 16,493 (15,470) 2,210 250 8,745
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 524 739 (63) (19,419) (3,437)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation 8,434 - - - -
Extraordinary loss (1,257) - - - -
Cumulative effect of accounting principle changes - - - - (10,131)
Net income (loss) 24,194 (14,731) 2,147 (19,169) (4,823)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations(3) $ 2.58 $ (2.43) $ .35 $ .04 $ 1.38
Discontinued operations .08 .12 (.01) (3.06) (.54)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation 1.32 - - - -
Extraordinary loss (.20) - - - -
Cumulative effect of accounting principle changes - - - - (1.60)
Net income (loss) 3.78 (2.31) .34 (3.02) (.76)
Financial Position
Working capital $ 21,173 $ 31,787 $ 46,789 $ 23,728 $ 40,630
Total assets 176,689 231,372 227,825 219,065 236,699
Long-term debt 2,044 68,350 49,166 20,342 27,865
Total debt 2,855 68,850 49,816 25,742 31,065
Total capital employed 104,772 143,725 142,512 118,865 148,217
Total debt as a percentage of capital employed 2.7% 47.9% 35.0% 21.7% 21.0%
Shareholders' equity $101,917 $ 74,875 $ 92,696 $ 93,123 $117,152
Shareholders' equity per common share 15.90 11.75 14.55 14.74 18.57
Other Selected Data
Investment in plant and equipment $ 12,823 $ 13,163 $ 15,937 $ 14,489 $ 11,936
Depreciation and amortization 17,457 17,400 14,146 14,061 12,793
Dividends per common share - .54 .72 .72 .72
Return on average shareholders' equity 27.4% (17.6)% 2.3% (18.2)% (3.9)%
Common stock price range:
High $ 19 5/8 $ 21 $ 30 3/4 $ 31 3/4 $ 31 1/4
Low 9 1/8 12 1/4 19 3/4 25 1/4 21
Year-end closing price 12 13 5/8 20 1/2 27 1/2 28 3/8
Number of employees 2,398 3,447 3,054 4,011 4,145
Average common and common
equivalent shares 6,402 6,374 6,360 6,343 6,325
<FN>
See Business Changes, Income Taxes and Postretirement Benefits Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
certain matters relevant to this data.
(1) Schedule includes the operational results for Cerion Technologies, Inc. ("Cerion") through May 23, 1996, the date immediately
prior to the initial public offering of Cerion stock. As a result of the initial public offering, the Company no longer
consolidates the results of Cerion and has accounted for its remaining interest under the equity method of accounting.
(2) Beginning in 1996, postage expenses related to prepaid photo mailers, which previously were treated as selling expenses, were
reclassified to cost of products sold. Such expenses amounted to $9.8 million, $6.3 million, $3.7 million, $2.5 million and $2.8
million for the years 1996, 1995, 1994 ,1993, and 1992, respectively. All financial information has been restated to conform to
this presentation.
(3) Income (loss) is from continuing operations and before the cumulative effect of accounting principle changes and includes
restructuring and other unusual charges of $7.2 million for 1996 (1.8% of sales), $16.2 million for 1995 (3.6% of sales),
$2.6 million for 1994 (.6% of sales) and $11.8 million for 1993 (2.8% of sales). Also, 1996 includes gains from the disposition of
Cerion stock and Cerion's public stock offering of $32 million and $7.3 million, respectively.
</TABLE>
-13-
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
- ------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
---------------------
Results of Continuing Operations - 1996 Compared to 1995
Net sales of $389.7 million decreased 13.8 percent from 1995, primarily due to
lower volumes in the Commercial Products Group. The Company recorded net income
from continuing operations of $16.5 million, compared to a net loss from
continuing operations of $15.5 million in 1995. The 1996 results included
restructuring and other unusual charges of $7.2 million, a $32 million pretax
gain on the disposition of a portion of the Company's ownership in Cerion
Technologies Inc. ("Cerion") and a $7.3 million pretax gain from the Company's
interest in the shares sold by Cerion. The 1995 results included restructuring
and other unusual charges of $16.2 million and the recognition of a $3.3 million
valuation allowance against tax assets due to the probability that such assets
would not be realized. The Company's pretax operating results before all gains
from dispositions and restructuring and other unusual charges improved from a
loss of $3.9 million in 1995 to a loss of $3.5 million in 1996, due to improved
operating results in the Commercial Products Group and lower interest expense.
This was partially offset by decreases in operating income in the Photo Group
and Cerion, including recognition of losses from the Company's continuing
investment in Cerion.
During 1996, the Company completed the sale of its Tape Products Division.
The Company received $28 million for the net assets of the business resulting in
an after-tax gain of $8.4 million. The results of the Tape Products Division's
operations and the gain on the sale are reported as a discontinued operation.
Also during 1996, the Company recorded an after-tax charge of $1.3 million
associated with the extinguishment of debt.
<TABLE>
The net restructuring and other unusual charges of $7.2 million in 1996
included a $7 million charge in the second quarter for the write-down of
goodwill in the mainland European photo business, a $1.7 million net pretax loss
on the sale of that business in the fourth quarter, $1.2 million for the cost of
divesting the organic photoconductor ("OPC") drum product line, and $1.3 million
and $.2 million for other business unit and functional realignments in Corporate
and the Photo Group, respectively. These charges were partially offset by $4.2
million of income associated with reassessment in 1996 of certain charges
recorded in 1995 for product and channel rationalizations in the Commercial
Products Group. Details of the charges related to continuing operations and the
activity recorded during 1996 are as follows:
<CAPTION>
Balance Balance
Dec. 31, Current Year Current Year Dec. 31,
(In thousands) 1995 Provision Charges 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Provisions for severance related to workforce reductions $2,600 $ 315 $ 2,125 $ 790
Provisions related to other personnel costs 150 - 150 -
Provisions for assets to be sold or discarded - 11,325 8,000 3,325
Other 2,050 1,925 1,710 2,265
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $4,800 $13,565 $11,985 $6,380
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The provision for assets to be sold or discarded relates primarily to the net
assets of the OPC drum product line and certain assets of the mainland European
photo business. All charges, excluding asset write-downs, are principally cash
in nature and are expected to be funded from operations. Disposal of the assets
is expected to be completed in 1997. The restructuring activities provided for
in the balance at December 31, 1995 were substantially completed at December 31,
1996 and resulted in annualized savings of approximately $5 million.
Net sales for the Commercial Products Group decreased $46.5 million, or
18.9 percent, due to lower volume across several product lines and the disposal
of the office catalog supplies business in December 1995. Volume declines were
experienced in facsimile, carbonless and copy papers, label rollstock, toner,
remanufactured laser printer cartridges and diskettes. Volumes increased
slightly in certain converted label, dry gum and thermal facesheet products. The
operating loss before restructuring and other unusual charges decreased $4.7
million compared to 1995, primarily due to lower raw material costs, improved
manufacturing productivity and reduced selling, distribution and administrative
expenses.
Net sales in the Photo Group decreased $7.8 million, or 4.4 percent, from
the prior year due to the disposition of the mainland European photo business in
the fourth quarter of 1996, lower volumes in the U.S., U.K. and Canada, lower
selling prices in the U.K. and Canada, and the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar,
partially offset by higher selling prices in the U.S. and Northern Ireland. The
higher U.S. selling price was primarily due to the increased use of business
reply mailers. The lower volumes and selling prices were due to competitive
pressure and the effect of a postal strike in the U.K. Operating income before
restructuring and other unusual charges declined $4 million from the prior year,
resulting from lower volume in the U.S., U.K. and Canada and the lower selling
prices in the U.K. and Canada. In the fourth quarter of 1996, postage expenses
related to prepaid mailers, which previously were treated as selling expenses,
were reclassified to cost of products sold. Such expenses amounted to $9.8
million and $6.3 million for 1996 and 1995, respectively. All financial
information has been restated to conform to this presentation.
-14-
<PAGE> 16
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company and Cerion completed the
initial public offering of common stock of Cerion at a price of $13.00 per
share. A total of 4,416,000 shares were sold, of which 1,615,000 were sold by
Cerion and 2,801,000 were sold by the Company. The Company received net proceeds
of $33.1 million and recorded a $32 million pretax gain on its sale of Cerion
shares and a $7.3 million pretax gain from the Company's interest in the shares
sold by Cerion. As a result of the sale, the Company's ownership of Cerion was
reduced to 37.1 percent, and accordingly, the Company no longer consolidates the
results of Cerion and has accounted for its remaining interest under the equity
method of accounting since the completion of the initial public stock offering.
On March 1, 1996, Cerion distributed a dividend to the Company in the form
of a promissory note payable in the principal sum of $10 million bearing
interest at the rate of 7.32 percent per annum from March 1, 1996 to September
30, 1996. The promissory note was repaid on May 31, 1996.
Net sales recorded by the Company in 1996 related to Cerion were $19.3
million, compared to $27.5 million for 1995. The 1996 net sales were through May
23, 1996, the date immediately prior to the initial public offering of Cerion
common stock. In 1996, the Company recorded a net total of $5.1 million of
operating income and loss from its equity interest in Cerion, compared to
operating income of $6 million for 1995.
Administrative expenses increased 3 percent as a result of increases in
non-recurring legal expenses, increases in performance incentives and the
rebuilding of the Photo Group's senior management team. Selling and distribution
expenses decreased 11 percent due to lower volumes in both Commercial Products
and Photo Groups, as well as lower promotional activities in the Photo Group.
Research and development expenses increased 4 percent due to increased spending
on Corporate projects and at Cerion prior to the transaction described above.
The effective tax rate for continuing operations was 42.4 percent in 1996
compared to a benefit of 23.2 percent in 1995. The 1996 effective rate was
greater than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to non-deductible goodwill
amortization, state income taxes and the write-off of certain tax assets. The
1995 tax benefit was less than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the
establishment of a valuation allowance against long-term tax assets and the
unfavorable impact of non-deductible goodwill amortization.
Results of Continuing Operations - 1995 Compared to 1994
Net sales of $452.2 million increased 8 percent from 1994, primarily as a result
of the Company's acquisition of photo businesses in mainland Europe and Ireland
in the first quarter of 1995 and increased Cerion volume, partially offset by a
decline in sales in the Commercial Products Group. The Company recorded a net
loss from continuing operations of $15.5 million, including restructuring and
other unusual charges of $16.2 million and a valuation allowance of $3.3 million
against tax assets due to the probability that such assets would not be
realized. This compared to net income from continuing operations of $2.2 million
in 1994, including restructuring and other unusual charges of $2.6 million. The
Company's pretax results before restructuring and other unusual charges
decreased from income of $6.6 million in 1994 to a loss of $3.9 million in 1995
due to lower operating income in the Photo Group, increased operating losses in
the Commercial Products Group, increased spending in Microsharp, and increased
interest expense, partially offset by an increase in Cerion's operating income.
During December 1995, the Company announced its intention to sell the Tape
Products Division due to the continuing realignment of the Company's Commercial
Products Group. The sale of the Tape Products Division was completed in 1996.
The Tape Products Division manufactured a variety of masking and duct tapes, and
had substantially different customers, markets, distribution channels and cost
structure than the remaining Commercial Products Group's businesses. The results
of the Tape Products Division have been reported as a discontinued operation.
<TABLE>
The total restructuring and other unusual charges of $16.2 million in 1995
included $14.3 million related to the Commercial Products Group, primarily for
business unit and functional realignments, product and channel rationalizations,
inventory write-downs related to the remanufactured cartridge operation and cost
reduction initiatives. The remainder of the 1995 charges resulted primarily from
changes in the Company's executive management during the year, including
severance and other personnel related costs. The 1995 restructuring and other
unusual charges included charges of $8.2 million and $8 million in the third and
fourth quarters, respectively. Details of the charges related to continuing
operations and the activity recorded during 1995 are as follows:
<CAPTION>
Balance Balance
Dec. 31, 1995 1995 Dec. 31,
(In thousands) 1994 Provision Charges 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Provisions for severance related to workforce reductions $1,550 $ 3,000 $ 1,950 $2,600
Provisions related to other personnel costs 150 850 850 150
Provisions for assets to be sold or discarded 1,250 8,800 10,050 -
Other - 3,550 1,500 2,050
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $2,950 $16,200 $14,350 $4,800
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
-15-
<PAGE> 17
The 1995 provision for workforce reductions included amounts for salary and
benefit continuation for approximately 110 employees as part of the Commercial
Products Group's reorganization and product rationalization. The 1995 provision
for assets to be sold or discarded included approximately $5.6 million related
to cartridge inventory write-downs, as well as other asset write-downs resulting
from product and channel rationalization within the Commercial Products Group.
The cartridge inventory charges related primarily to excess empty cartridges
received in 1995 under rebate programs and contractual obligations, most of
which had been terminated by the end of 1995. At December 31, 1996,
substantially all employee reductions related to these actions had been
completed. All charges, excluding asset write-downs, were principally cash in
nature and were funded from operations. All restructuring activities provided
for in the balance at December 31, 1994 were completed in 1995. Amounts incurred
did not change materially from the reserve balance of $3 million.
Net sales for the Commercial Products Group decreased $14 million, or 5
percent, driven by lower volumes across several product lines, somewhat offset
by higher selling prices. Volume declines were experienced in facsimile,
carbonless and copy papers, label rollstock, toner, diskettes and office catalog
supplies. Volumes increased in remanufactured laser printer cartridges and
converted label products. Selling price increases across most of the paper-based
product lines reduced the unfavorable impact of volume declines. The operating
loss before restructuring and other unusual charges increased $4.7 million
compared to 1994, primarily due to the lower volumes, partially offset by lower
selling and administrative expenses. Selling price increases were offset by
higher raw material costs.
Net sales in the Photo Group increased $33.8 million, or 23 percent, from
the prior year due to the acquisition of mainland European and Northern Ireland
photo businesses in the first quarter of 1995. To a lesser extent, sales
increased from higher selling prices in the U.S. and U.K., as well as from the
impact of a weaker U.S. dollar. These favorable impacts were offset by lower
volumes in the U.S., U.K. and Canada resulting from continued competitive
pressure. Operating income declined $9.2 million from the prior year, resulting
from lower volume in the U.S. and Canada, as well as higher costs in the U.S.
and U.K. The higher costs in the U.S. resulted from increased postal rates,
higher mailer costs and increased circulation volumes. U.K. marketing costs
increased due to investments in new and redesigned brand launches as well as an
increase in the cost of mailers. In the fourth quarter of 1996, postage expenses
related to prepaid mailers, which previously were treated as selling expenses,
were reclassified to cost of products sold. Such expenses amounted to $6.3
million and $3.7 million for 1995 and 1994, respectively. All financial
information has been restated to conform to this presentation.
Sales by Cerion increased $13.5 million to $27.5 million in 1995, and
Cerion's operating income increased to $6 million in 1995 from a loss of $.2
million in 1994. The improvements were due to strong demand for aluminum
substrates, improved product mix and manufacturing efficiencies associated with
the increases in volume.
Administrative expenses increased 23 percent as the result of the photo
businesses acquired in 1995, partially offset by efficiencies resulting from the
restructuring actions taken in 1994. After considering the impact of the Photo
Group's reclassification previously discussed, the selling and distribution
expenses as a percent of sales increased 10 percent due to the 1995 photo
acquisition. Research and development expenses were substantially unchanged year
to year.
The effective tax rate for continuing operations was a benefit of 23.2
percent in 1995 compared to a charge of 45.2 percent in 1994. The tax benefit
was less than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the establishment of a
valuation allowance against long-term tax assets and the unfavorable impact of
non-deductible goodwill amortization.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The Company believes that results of operations as reported in its historical
cost financial statements reasonably match current costs, except for
depreciation, with revenues generated in the period. Depreciation expense based
on the current costs of plant and equipment would be significantly higher than
depreciation expense reported in the historical financial statements; however,
such expense would not affect cash provided by operating activities.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Working capital decreased $10.6 million from December 31, 1995, primarily due to
a $7.4 million reduction resulting from the sale of the Tape Products Division,
a $4 million reduction resulting from the deconsolidation of Cerion due to the
public stock offering, a $3.5 million reduction in accounts receivable, a $5
million reduction in inventory, a $16 million reduction in other current assets,
and a $.3 million increase in the current maturities of long-term debt,
partially offset by an $11.6 million increase in cash, a $7.2 million reduction
in accrued liabilities, a $4 million reduction in income taxes payable and a
$2.8 million decrease in accounts payable. The decrease in accounts receivable
was primarily due to lower sales. The inventory reductions were the result of
management control initiatives implemented during the year. The decrease in
other current assets was primarily due to the use of tax assets to offset income
tax liabilities. The accrued liabilities decrease was due to a reduction in the
current funding requirement of postretirement benefit obligations. The accounts
payable decrease was due to the sale of the mainland European photo business. A
majority of the working capital generated from the sale of the Tape Products
Division, Cerion stock and the mainland European photo business, and the
proceeds from the Cerion promissory note, was used to repay existing
indebtedness. At December 31, 1996, the total debt as a percentage of equity
decreased to 3 percent from 92 percent at December 31, 1995. The Company
suspended its quarterly dividend in 1995 and intends to review this decision
when the Company's financial performance would make such reconsideration
appropriate. The Company relies primarily on cash provided by operating
activities to fund its normal additions to plant and equipment. Investments in
plant and equipment in 1996 were approximately $13 million.
-16-
<PAGE> 18
During 1996, the Company renegotiated its unsecured $75 million revolving
credit facility and its senior note agreement. Since September 29, 1995, the
Company had not been in compliance with certain financial covenants and the
lenders provided the Company with a forbearance during which time the parties
negotiated amendments to the lending agreements in order to allow the Company to
remain in compliance. As a result of the 1996 negotiations, the revolving credit
facility was replaced by a bank facility (the "Bank Facility"). The Bank
Facility designated $48 million that was outstanding under the previous
revolving credit facility as a term loan with the remainder as outstanding under
a new revolving credit facility. The Bank Facility has a total of $10 million of
credit available under its revolving credit facility, of which $5 million is
available exclusively for letters of credit. At December 31, 1996, the Company
was obligated under approximately $3.7 million in standby letters of credit.
Interest on amounts outstanding under the Bank Facility is payable at prime rate
plus .5 percent. The revised senior note agreement increased the interest rate
from 9.67 percent to 11.85 percent per annum. The Bank Facility requires a
commitment fee of .5 percent per annum on unused amounts, as well as a 2 percent
per annum fee on letters of credit.
As a result of the Cerion stock offering, the Tape Products Division sale
and the sale of the mainland European photo business, the term loan portion of
the Bank Facility and the revised senior notes were repaid during 1996, and as
of December 31, 1996, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit
facility portion of the Bank Facility, which expires on December 31, 1997.
Borrowings under the Bank Facility are collateralized by a security
interest in the Company's receivables and inventory, assets of the domestic and
certain foreign subsidiaries and the stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. The
agreement contains certain financial covenants with respect to tangible net
worth, capital expenditures, cash flows and the ratio of cash flows to fixed
charges. In addition, without prior consent of the lenders, the agreement does
not allow the payment of dividends and restricts, among other things, the
incurrence of additional debt, guarantees, lease arrangements or the sale of
certain assets. As of December 31, 1996, the Company was in compliance with
these covenants.
On December 26, 1996, the Company entered into a note agreement under which
the Company borrowed $2.6 million. The note is to be paid back in sixty equal
monthly payments, starting in January 1997. The note bears interest per annum
equal to 2.5 percent above the LIBOR rate which was 5.6 percent at December 31,
1996. The note is collateralized by a security interest in certain equipment.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had $4.7 million and $2.4 million of net
operating loss carryforward benefits and tax credit carryforwards, respectively,
which are primarily available to offset certain future domestic taxable
earnings. The net operating loss carryforward benefits expire as follows: $.5
million in 1999; $2.6 million in 2000; and $1.6 million thereafter. The tax
credit carryforwards expire as follows: $.2 million in 1997; $.1 million in
1998; $.1 million in 1999; $.2 million in 2000; and $1.8 million thereafter.
Management believes that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable
income to realize deferred tax assets prior to the expiration of any net
operating loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards and that realization of
the net deferred tax assets is more likely than not.
In April 1994, Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Ricoh Corporation ("Ricoh") filed a
Complaint with the United States District Court, District of New Hampshire,
alleging the Company's infringement of the U.S. patents 4,611,730 and 4,878,603
relating to certain toner cartridges for Ricoh copiers. The Complaint seeks
damages and injunctive relief. The case was tried in the second quarter of 1996.
The Company believes it has substantial defenses but it cannot predict the
outcome. Ricoh alleged that its damages, if it were successful on the merits,
would be approximately $10 million as of the date of the trial, and the Company
alleged that even if Ricoh were to prevail that such damages should be in the
range of $.1 million to $.4 million. Ricoh also is seeking treble damages and
attorneys' fees for willful infringement, but the Company believes an award for
such damages is unlikely. The Company is awaiting the Court's decision.
In August and September 1996, two individual plaintiffs initiated lawsuits
against the Company, Cerion, certain directors and officers of Cerion, and the
Company's underwriter, on behalf of classes consisting of all persons who
purchased the common stock of Cerion between May 24, 1996 and July 9, 1996. The
complaints allege that, in connection with the Cerion initial public offering,
the defendants issued certain materially false and misleading statements and
omitted the disclosure of material facts, in particular, certain matters
concerning significant customer relationships. The complaints seek damages and
injunctive relief. The Company believes these lawsuits are without merit and it
has substantial defenses and intends to vigorously defend against these actions.
-17-
<PAGE> 19
During 1994, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") completed an examination
of the Company's corporate income tax returns for the years 1988 through 1991.
As a result of the IRS' findings, the Company agreed to and paid additional
taxes and interest of $7.8 million in January 1995 in connection with
adjustments related mainly to the tax treatment of certain items associated with
the 1990 sale of the International Office Systems business. On January 13, 1995,
the IRS issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment in the amount of $8.7 million in
connection with the tax years 1990 and 1991 relating to the tax treatment of
income recognized in connection with the 1990 sale of the International Office
Systems business. The Company disagreed with the position taken by the IRS and
filed a formal protest of the proposed adjustment on February 9, 1995. On
November 25, 1996, the IRS and the Company reached an agreement in connection
with the tax years 1990 and 1991 in which the Company agreed to an additional
tax payment before interest in the amount of $.5 million for 1990 and a tax
refund before interest in the amount of $.4 million for 1991. On February 4,
1997, the Company received a payment from the IRS in the amount of $.4 million
in connection with the settlement of 1991. On February 3, 1997, the IRS issued
the Company an assessment in the amount of $2.5 million, of which $.5 million
represents agreed taxes due and $2 million represents interest on such taxes.
The Company disagrees with the interest portion of the amount and intends to
challenge such assessment. In management's opinion, the ultimate disposition of
this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or
results of operations of the Company.
The Company (and its competitors) are subject to various environmental laws
and regulations. These include the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act ("CERCLA"), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
("RCRA"), the Clean Water Act and other state and local counterparts of these
statutes. The Company believes that its operations have been and continue to be
operating in compliance in all material respects with the applicable
environmental laws and regulations. (Violation of these laws and regulations
could result in substantial fines and penalties). Nevertheless, in the past and
potentially in the future, the Company has received and could receive notices of
alleged environmental violations. The Company has endeavored to promptly remedy
any such violations upon notification.
For the past three years, the Company has spent approximately $1 million
per year in order to keep its operations in compliance with pertinent
environmental laws and regulations. In addition, for those sites which the
Company has received notification of the need to remediate, the Company has
assessed its liability and accrued what it considers to be the most likely
amount within the estimated range of remediation costs. At December 31, 1996,
the accrual for potential environmental liability was $1.6 million. Liability of
potentially responsible parties ("PRP") under CERCLA and RCRA; however, is joint
and several, and actual remediation expenses at sites where the Company is a PRP
may exceed current estimates. The Company believes that, based on the facts
currently known and the environmental accrual recorded, its remediation expense
with respect to those sites and on-going costs of compliance are not likely to
have a material adverse effect on its liquidity, consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
Based upon projected future cash flows from operating activities, the sale
of certain assets, as well as credit availability under the revised lending
agreement, the Company believes that it has the liquidity and capital resources
needed to meet its future financial commitments.
-18-
<PAGE> 20
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
- ------- -------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings
<CAPTION>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data) 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $389,742 $452,196 $418,903
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of products sold 286,390 342,377 318,302
Selling, distribution and administrative expenses 95,064 99,637 82,976
Research and development expense 9,621 9,238 9,128
Restructuring and other unusual charges 7,167 16,247 2,600
Equity in net loss of Cerion Technologies 135 - -
Gain on disposition of Cerion Technologies stock (31,962) - -
Gain on Cerion Technologies public stock offering (7,353) - -
Interest expense 2,743 5,532 2,451
Interest income (697) (686) (585)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total costs and expenses, net of Cerion Technologies gains 361,108 472,345 414,872
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes 28,634 (20,149) 4,031
Income taxes (benefit) 12,141 (4,679) 1,821
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations 16,493 (15,470) 2,210
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 524 739 (63)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation, net of taxes 8,434 - -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss 25,451 (14,731) 2,147
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax benefit (1,257) - -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) 24,194 (14,731) 2,147
Retained earnings, beginning of period 61,563 79,744 82,166
Dividends - (3,450) (4,569)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained earnings, end of period $ 85,757 $ 61,563 $ 79,744
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations $ 2.58 $ (2.43) $ .35
Income (loss) from discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations .08 .12 (.01)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation 1.32 - -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss 3.98 (2.31) .34
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt (.20) - -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $ 3.78 $ (2.31) $ .34
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
-19-
<PAGE> 21
<TABLE>
Consolidated Balance Sheet
<CAPTION>
December 31,
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except share data) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 20,018 $ 8,390
Accounts receivable 20,112 29,579
Inventories
Materials and supplies 6,676 10,318
Work in process 2,498 2,835
Finished goods 7,494 8,870
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16,668 22,023
Other current assets 15,367 31,785
Net current assets of discontinued operation - 7,415
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,165 99,192
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plant and Equipment
Land 1,137 1,377
Buildings and improvements 35,754 37,739
Machinery and equipment 77,063 85,305
Construction in progress 4,623 3,237
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
118,577 127,658
Accumulated depreciation (58,459) (57,601)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
60,118 70,057
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate 7,218 -
Other Assets 37,188 55,481
Net Non-Current Assets of Discontinued Operation - 6,642
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets $176,689 $231,372
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt $ 811 $ 500
Accounts payable 22,678 26,858
Accrued expenses 24,880 33,385
Income taxes payable 2,623 6,662
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
50,992 67,405
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Debt
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement - 53,000
Senior notes - 15,000
Other long-term debt 2,044 350
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,044 68,350
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Long-Term Liabilities 21,736 20,742
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, par value $1.00: 2,000,000 shares authorized and unissued - -
Common stock, par value $1.00: Authorized 40,000,000 shares
Issued 6,647,255 shares in 1996 and 6,502,570 shares in 1995 6,647 6,503
Additional capital 12,107 12,178
Retained earnings 85,757 61,563
Cumulative translation adjustment (1,837) (4,618)
Treasury stock, at cost (757) (751)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
101,917 74,875
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commitments and Contingencies
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $176,689 $231,372
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
-20-
<PAGE> 22
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities of Continuing Operations
Net income (loss) $ 24,194 $(14,731) $ 2,147
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in)
continuing operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 17,457 17,400 14,146
Deferred income taxes 5,999 (6,387) (1,497)
Write-down of long-lived assets to net realizable value 8,000 1,629 -
(Income) loss from discontinued operations (524) (739) 63
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation (8,434) - -
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt 1,257 - -
Equity in net loss of Cerion Technologies 135 - -
Gain on disposition of Cerion Technologies stock (31,962) - -
Gain on Cerion Technologies public stock offering (7,353) - -
Loss on sale of mainland European photo business 1,700 - -
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisition and disposal of businesses:
Accounts receivable 369 9,345 (5,957)
Inventories 3,654 9,602 (5,760)
Other assets 6,377 5,900 (3,957)
Accounts payable (2,407) (3,257) 59
Accrued expenses (11,441) 7,856 (13,446)
Other long-term liabilities 643 (3,848) 2,144
Income taxes payable 4,081 1,738 9,029
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities 11,745 24,508 (3,029)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations
Investment in plant and equipment (12,823) (13,163) (15,937)
Acquisition of businesses - (27,596) -
Proceeds from repayment of Cerion Technologies notes 11,142 - -
Proceeds from sale of mainland European photo business 7,174 - -
Proceeds from sale of Cerion Technologies stock, net 33,080 - -
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities 38,573 (40,759) (15,937)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations
Proceeds from borrowings 3,434 32,800 52,900
Repayment of borrowings (69,429) (13,766) (28,826)
Dividends paid - (3,450) (4,569)
Proceeds and tax benefits from shares issued under stock option plans 73 14 1,081
Extinguishment of debt (952) - -
Purchase and reissuance of treasury stock (6) 36 (2)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities (66,880) 15,634 20,584
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations 28,000 6,950 11,115
Cash applied to activities of discontinued operations (219) (8,173) (8,612)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 409 11 215
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 11,628 (1,829) 4,336
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 8,390 10,219 5,883
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 20,018 $ 8,390 $ 10,219
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest paid $ 3,406 $ 7,565 $ 2,457
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes paid $ 6,010 $ 9,054 $ 1,171
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
-21-
<PAGE> 23
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Nashua Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
("the Company").
Revenue Recognition: Sales are recognized at the time the goods are shipped or
when title passes.
Sale of Stock by a Subsidiary: The Company recognizes gains and losses on its
subsidiary's direct sale of shares of stock in which the selling price of the
subsidiary's shares is greater than or less than the Company's carrying value.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
these financial statements and accompanying notes. The more significant areas
requiring the use of management estimates relate to allowances for obsolete
inventory and uncollectible receivables, environmental obligations,
postretirement and other employee benefits, valuation allowances for deferred
tax assets, future cash flows associated with assets, and useful lives for
depreciation and amortization. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments
purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company held $13.9 million and $4.3 million,
respectively, of various money market instruments carried at cost, which
approximated market.
Accounts Receivable: The consolidated balance is net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1.9 million at December 31, 1996 and $2.4 million at December 31,
1995.
Advertising Costs: The Company defers certain costs related to direct-response
advertising of its products. Such costs are amortized over periods that
correspond to the estimated revenue stream of the individual advertising program
which is generally less than one year. Total deferred costs at December 31, 1996
and 1995 were $3.9 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The total amounts
charged to expense for 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $36.1 million, $39.6 million and
$25 million, respectively.
Inventories: Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined by the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method for approximately 66
percent and 77 percent of the inventories at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, and by the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method for the balance. Had
the FIFO method been used to cost all inventories, the inventory balances would
have been approximately $2.9 million and $3.4 million higher at December 31,
1996 and 1995, respectively.
Plant and Equipment: Plant and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while additions,
renewals and betterments of plant and equipment are capitalized. Items which are
fully depreciated, sold, retired or otherwise disposed of, together with the
related accumulated depreciation, are removed from the accounts and, where
applicable, the related gain or loss is recognized.
For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buildings and improvements 5-40 years
Machinery and equipment 3-20 years
The Company reviews the value of its plant and equipment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
Goodwill: Included in "Other Assets" is the excess of cost over the fair value
of identifiable net assets acquired (goodwill), which is being amortized on a
straight-line basis over periods ranging from 5 to 20 years. Goodwill amounted
to $22 million and $32.6 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively,
which is net of accumulated amortization of $9 million and $7.9 million,
respectively. The Company reviews the value of its goodwill whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully
recoverable. See the Business Changes note.
Research and Development: Research and development costs are expensed as
incurred.
-22-
<PAGE> 24
Stock Compensation: The Company's employee stock option plans are accounted for
in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees." In 1996, the Company adopted the disclosure
requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation."
Income Taxes: Prepaid or deferred income taxes result principally from the use
of different methods of depreciation and amortization for income tax and
financial reporting purposes, the recognition of expenses for financial
reporting purposes in years different from those in which the expenses are
deductible for income tax purposes and the recognition of the tax benefit of net
operating losses and other tax credits.
Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency of the Company's foreign
subsidiaries is the local currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of these
subsidiaries have been translated using exchange rates prevailing at the
appropriate balance sheet date and income statement items have been translated
using average monthly exchange rates.
Financial Instruments: The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts as
hedges against exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates associated with
certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Market value gains or
losses on these contracts are included in the results of operations and
generally offset gains or losses on the related transactions. The Company also
utilizes forward sales contracts to hedge market price exposure on anticipated
sales of silver alloy, a by-product of its photofinishing process. The terms of
the Company's forward contracts are generally less than one year. Gains and
losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized as adjustments of carrying
amounts when the hedged transaction occurs. Deferred gains or losses at December
31, 1996 and 1995 are not significant.
The Company may selectively enter into interest rate swap agreements to
reduce the impact of interest rate changes on its floating rate debt. The
notional amounts of such agreements are used to measure carrying value (interest
to be paid or received) and do not represent the amount of exposure to loss.
In 1995, the Company entered into a three-year $10 million interest rate
swap whereby the Company paid interest at a fixed rate of 5.68 percent and
received interest at the three-month LIBOR rate which was 5.94 percent at
December 31, 1995. Net interest payable or receivable was determined on a
quarterly basis and was insignificant at December 31, 1995. On March 29, 1996,
this swap agreement was terminated at a cost of $.1 million. All future payment
obligations under this swap transaction are terminated.
The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes.
Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject
the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash
equivalents, short-term investments, trade receivables and financial instruments
used in hedging activities.
The Company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality
financial institutions and in high quality commercial paper and, by policy,
limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited
because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the Company's
customer base, thus spreading the trade credit risk. The Company performs
ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and maintains
allowances for potential credit losses. The Company generally does not require
collateral or other security to support customer receivables.
The counterparties to the agreements relating to the Company's foreign
exchange commitments consist of a number of high credit quality financial
institutions. The Company does not believe that there is significant risk of
nonperformance by these counterparties.
Environmental Expenditures: Environmental expenditures relating to ongoing
operations are expensed when incurred unless the expenditures extend the life,
increase the capacity or improve the safety or efficiency of the property;
mitigate or prevent environmental contamination that has yet to occur and
improve the property compared with its original condition; or are incurred for
property held for sale.
Expenditures relating to site assessment, remediation and monitoring are
accrued and expensed when the costs are both probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. Estimates are based on in-house or third-party studies
considering current technologies, remediation alternatives and current
environmental standards. In addition, if there are other participants and the
liability is joint and several, the financial stability of the other
participants is considered in determining the Company's accrual. Insurance and
other recoveries relating to these expenditures are recorded separately once
recovery is probable.
Earnings per Common and Common Equivalent Share: Earnings per common and common
equivalent share are computed based on the total of the weighted average number
of common shares and, when applicable, the weighted average number of common
equivalent shares outstanding during the period presented.
Reclassification: Beginning in the fourth quarter of 1996, postage expenses
related to prepaid photo mailers, which previously were treated as selling
expenses, have been reclassified to cost of products sold. Such expenses
amounted to $9.8 million, $6.3 million and $3.7 million for 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. All financial information has been restated to conform to this
presentation.
-23-
<PAGE> 25
Business Changes
Acquisitions and Dispositions: During the second quarter of 1996, the Company
and Cerion completed the initial public offering of common stock of Cerion at a
price of $13.00 per share. A total of 4,416,000 shares were sold, of which
1,615,000 were sold by Cerion and 2,801,000 were sold by the Company. The
Company received net proceeds of $33.1 million and recorded a $32 million pretax
gain on its sale of Cerion shares and a $7.3 million pretax gain from the
Company's interest in the shares sold by Cerion. As a result of the sale, the
Company's ownership of Cerion was reduced to 37.1 percent, and accordingly, the
Company now uses the equity method of accounting for its investment in Cerion
common stock.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company completed the sale of its
mainland European photo business. The Company received proceeds of approximately
$7 million and recorded a net pretax loss of $1.7 million. During the second
quarter of 1996, the Company recorded a $7 million charge in the mainland
European photo business to write-down the value of its goodwill.
In 1995, the Company acquired the mainland European photo business, along
with a wholesale film processing business in Northern Ireland from Nexus Photo
Ltd. The total purchase price was $27.6 million. The acquisition was accounted
for as a purchase business combination and resulted in the recording of
approximately $22 million of related intangible assets, of which $12.7 million
related to the mainland European photo business.
Discontinued Operations: During the second quarter of 1996, the Company sold its
Tape Products Division for approximately $28 million and as a result, recorded
an after tax gain of $8.4 million. During the second quarter of 1994, the
Company sold substantially all of its Computer Products businesses for total
cash proceeds of $11.1 million, subordinated notes of $4.9 million and future
royalty payments based on sales of the oxide disk and head-disk-assembly
operations. In addition, the Company received cash proceeds of $2 million based
on the 1994 operating results of the thin-film disk operation. As a result of
the sale of these businesses, the related results of operations are reported as
discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
During the first quarter of 1994, the Company offered its employees an
early retirement program and recorded an additional pretax charge of $3.1
million to discontinued operations related to that program.
<TABLE>
The 1994 results of operations of the thin-film disk, oxide disk and
head-disk-assembly operations, as well as the Tape Products Division results for
1996, 1995 and 1994 are summarized as follows:
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
(In thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $23,632 $58,444 $78,911
Income before income taxes 876 1,239 157
Income tax expense 352 500 220
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ 524 $ 739 $ (63)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Restructuring and Other Unusual Charges: The net restructuring and other unusual
charges of $7.2 million in 1996 included a $7 million charge in the second
quarter for the write-down of goodwill in the mainland European photo business,
a $1.7 million net pretax loss on the sale of that business in the fourth
quarter, $1.2 million for the cost of divesting the OPC drum product line, and
$1.3 million and $.2 million for other business unit and functional realignments
in Corporate and the Photo Group, respectively. These charges were partially
offset by $4.2 million of income associated with reassessment in 1996 of certain
charges recorded in 1995 for product and channel rationalizations in the
Commercial Products Group. Details of the charges related to continuing
operations and the activity recorded during 1996 are as follows:
<CAPTION>
Balance Balance
Dec. 31, Current Year Current Year Dec. 31,
(In thousands) 1995 Provision Charges 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 Activity:
Provisions for severance related to workforce reductions $2,600 $ 315 $ 2,125 $ 790
Provisions related to other personnel costs 150 - 150 -
Provisions for assets to be sold or discarded - 11,325 8,000 3,325
Other 2,050 1,925 1,710 2,265
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $4,800 $13,565 $11,985 $6,380
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The provision for assets to be sold or discarded relates primarily to the net
assets of the OPC drum product line and certain assets of the mainland European
photo business. All charges, excluding asset write-downs, are principally cash
in nature and are expected to be funded from operations. Disposal of the assets
is expected to be completed in 1997. The restructuring activities provided for
in the balance at December 31, 1995, were substantially completed at December
31, 1996 and resulted in annualized savings of approximately $5 million.
-24-
<PAGE> 26
<TABLE>
The total restructuring and other unusual charges of $16.2 million in 1995
included $14.3 million related to the Commercial Products Group, primarily for
business unit and functional realignments, product and channel rationalizations,
inventory write-downs related to the remanufactured cartridge operation and cost
reduction initiatives. The remainder of the 1995 charges resulted primarily from
changes in the Company's executive management during the year, including
severance and other personnel related costs. The 1995 restructuring and other
unusual charges included charges of $8.2 million and $8 million in the third and
fourth quarters, respectively. Details of the charges related to continuing
operations and the activity recorded during 1995 are as follows:
<CAPTION>
Balance Balance
Dec. 31, 1995 1995 Dec. 31,
(In thousands) 1994 Provision Charges 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1995 Activity:
Provisions for severance related to workforce reductions $1,550 $3,000 $1,950 $2,600
Provisions related to other personnel costs 150 850 850 150
Provisions for assets to be sold or discarded 1,250 8,800 10,050 -
Other - 3,550 1,500 2,050
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $2,950 $16,200 $14,350 $4,800
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The 1995 provision for workforce reductions included amounts for salary and
benefit continuation for approximately 110 employees as part of the Commercial
Products Group reorganization and product rationalization. The 1995 provision
for assets to be sold or discarded included approximately $5.6 million related
to cartridge inventory write-downs, as well as other asset write-downs resulting
from product and channel rationalization within the Commercial Products Group.
The cartridge inventory charges related primarily to excess empty cartridges
received in 1995 under rebate programs and contractual obligations, most of
which had been terminated by the end of 1995. At December 31, 1996,
substantially all employee reductions related to these actions had been
completed. All charges, excluding asset write-downs, were principally cash in
nature and were funded from operations. All restructuring activities provided
for in the balance at December 31, 1994 were completed in 1995. Amounts incurred
did not change materially from the reserve balance of $3 million.
Indebtedness
During 1996, the Company renegotiated its unsecured $75 million revolving credit
facility and its senior note agreement. Since September 29, 1995, the Company
had not been in compliance with certain financial covenants and the lenders
provided the Company with a forbearance during which time the parties negotiated
amendments to the lending agreements in order to allow the Company to remain in
compliance. As a result of the 1996 negotiations, the revolving credit facility
was replaced by a bank facility (the "Bank Facility"). The Bank Facility
designated $48 million that was outstanding under the previous revolving credit
facility as a term loan with the remainder as outstanding under a new revolving
credit facility. The Bank Facility has a total of $10 million of credit
available under its revolving credit facility, of which $5 million is available
exclusively for letters of credit. At December 31, 1996, the Company was
obligated under approximately $3.7 million in standby letters of credit.
Interest on amounts outstanding under the Bank Facility is payable at prime rate
plus .5 percent. The revised senior note agreement increased the interest rate
from 9.67 percent to 11.85 percent per annum. The Bank Facility requires a
commitment fee of .5 percent per annum on unused amounts, as well as a 2 percent
per annum fee on letters of credit.
As a result of the Cerion stock offering, the Tape Products Division sale
and the sale of the mainland European photo business, the term loan portion of
the Bank Facility and the revised senior notes were repaid during 1996, and as
of December 31, 1996, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit
facility portion of the Bank Facility, which expires on December 31, 1997. At
December 31, 1995, borrowings of $53 million and $15 million were outstanding
under the unsecured $75 million revolving credit facility and the senior note
agreement, respectively.
Borrowings under the Bank Facility are collateralized by a security
interest in the Company's receivables and inventory, assets of the domestic and
certain foreign subsidiaries and the stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. The
agreement contains certain financial covenants with respect to tangible net
worth, capital expenditures, cash flows and the ratio of cash flows to fixed
charges. In addition, without prior consent of the lenders, the agreement does
not allow the payment of dividends and restricts, among other things, the
incurrence of additional debt, guarantees, lease arrangements or sale of certain
assets. As of December 31, 1996, the Company was in compliance with these
covenants.
In 1996, the Company recorded a $1.3 million extraordinary loss, net of a
$.9 million income tax benefit, associated with the write-off of deferred debt
issuance costs and prepayment penalties.
On December 26, 1996, the Company entered into a note agreement under which
the Company borrowed $2.6 million. The note is to be paid back in sixty equal
monthly payments, starting in January 1997. The note bears interest per annum
equal to 2.5 percent above the LIBOR rate which was 5.6 percent at December 31,
1996. The note is collateralized by a security interest in certain equipment.
The fair value of the Company's total debt approximated its recorded amount
at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The fair value is based on
management's estimate of current rates available to the Company for similar debt
with the same remaining maturity.
-25-
<PAGE> 27
Income Taxes
<TABLE>
The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Domestic $35,730 $(22,766) $ (1,775)
Foreign (7,096) 2,617 5,806
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated $28,634 $(20,149) $ 4,031
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Income tax expense (benefit) charged to continuing operations consists of the following:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
United States $ 4,911 $ - $ -
Foreign 620 1,708 3,303
State and local 611 - 15
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current 6,142 1,708 3,318
Deferred:
United States 6,054 (6,703) (612)
Foreign (447) 316 (885)
State and local 392 - -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred 5,999 (6,387) (1,497)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income tax expense (benefit) $12,141 $ (4,679) $ 1,821
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Deferred tax liabilities (assets) are comprised of the following:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands) 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Depreciation $ 3,807 $ 3,859
Basis in Cerion stock 2,893 -
Other 1,585 1,478
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred tax liabilities 8,285 5,337
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restructuring (2,528) (1,886)
Pension and postretirement benefits (8,691) (9,386)
Loss and credit carryforwards (7,126) (21,478)
Workers compensation accrual (903) (1,343)
Inventory reserve (1,170) (2,673)
Bad debt reserve (928) (1,086)
Other (3,734) (1,997)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred tax assets (25,080) (39,849)
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance 328 3,300
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$(16,467) $(31,212)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Reconciliations between income taxes from continuing operations computed using the United States statutory income tax rate and
the Company's effective tax rate are as follows:
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States statutory rate (benefit) 35.0% (35.0)% 35.0%
Goodwill 1.0 1.5 8.2
State and local income taxes, net of
federal tax benefit 2.5 (5.6) .2
Tax asset valuation 1.9 16.4 -
Foreign tax credits - (1.6) -
Rate difference-foreign subsidiaries .6 (.3) (3.1)
Other, net 1.4 1.4 4.9
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective tax rate (benefit) 42.4% (23.2)% 45.2%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
-26-
<PAGE> 28
At December 31, 1996, $7.8 million and $8.7 million of net tax assets were
included in "Other Current Assets" and "Other Assets," respectively. At December
31, 1995, $19.3 million and $11.9 million of net tax assets were included in
"Other Current Assets" and "Other Assets," respectively.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had $4.7 million and $2.4 million of net
operating loss carryforward benefits and tax credit carryforwards, respectively,
which are primarily available to offset certain future domestic taxable
earnings. The net operating loss carryforward benefits expire as follows: $.5
million in 1999; $2.6 million in 2000; and $1.6 million thereafter. The tax
credit carryforwards expire as follows: $.2 million in 1997; $.1 million in
1998; $.1 million in 1999; $.2 million in 2000; and $1.8 million thereafter.
Management believes that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable
income to realize deferred tax assets prior to the expiration of any net
operating loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards and that realization of
the net deferred tax assets is more likely than not.
During 1994, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") completed an examination
of the Company's corporate income tax returns for the years 1988 through 1991.
As a result of the IRS' findings, the Company agreed to and paid additional
taxes and interest of $7.8 million in January 1995 in connection with
adjustments related mainly to the tax treatment of certain items associated with
the 1990 sale of the International Office Systems business. On January 13, 1995,
the IRS issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment in the amount of $8.7 million in
connection with the tax years 1990 and 1991 relating to the tax treatment of
income recognized in connection with the 1990 sale of the International Office
Systems business. The Company disagreed with the position taken by the IRS and
filed a formal protest of the proposed adjustment on February 9, 1995. On
November 25, 1996, the IRS and the Company reached an agreement in connection
with the tax years 1990 and 1991 in which the Company agreed to an additional
tax payment before interest in the amount of $.5 million for 1990 and a tax
refund before interest in the amount of $.4 million for 1991. On February 4,
1997, the Company received a payment from the IRS in the amount of $.4 million
in connection with the settlement of 1991. On February 3, 1997, the IRS issued
the Company an assessment in the amount of $2.5 million, of which $.5 million
represents agreed taxes due and $2 million represents interest on such taxes.
The Company disagrees with the interest portion of the amount and intends to
challenge such assessment. In management's opinion, the ultimate disposition of
this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or
results of operations of the Company.
It is management's intention to reinvest undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries which in the aggregate were approximately $22 million at December
31, 1996. These earnings could become subject to additional tax if they were
remitted as dividends, if foreign earnings were lent to the Company or if the
Company should sell its stock in the subsidiaries. It is not practicable to
estimate the amount of additional tax that might be payable on undistributed
foreign earnings.
Shareholders' Equity
On July 19, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights
Plan in which preferred stock purchase rights ("Rights") were distributed on
September 2, 1996 to holders of record on August 15, 1996 ("Record Date") as a
dividend at the rate of one Right for each share of the Company's common stock
outstanding as of the close of business on the Record Date. These Rights
replaced the rights outstanding under the Company's August 22, 1986 Rights
Agreement, which expired on September 2, 1996. Rights will also attach to shares
of common stock issued after the Record Date.
Each Right will entitle the holders of common stock of the Company to
purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred
Stock of the Company ("Series B Stock") at an exercise price of $75.00 (subject
to adjustment). Each share of Series B Stock would entitle its holder to a
quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share, an aggregate dividend of 100 times any
dividend declared on common stock and, in the event of liquidation of the
Company, each such share would entitle its holder to a payment of $1.00 plus 100
times the payment made per share of common stock. Initially, the Rights will be
attached to all certificates representing outstanding shares of common stock.
The Rights will detach and become exercisable only after a person or group
acquires beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the common stock of the
Company or announces a tender or exchange offer that would result in such person
or group owning 10 percent or more of the common stock of the Company.
After a person becomes the beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of the
shares of common stock of the Company, except pursuant to a tender or exchange
offer for all shares at a fair price as determined by the outside Board members,
each Right not owned by the 10 percent or more shareholder will enable its
holder to purchase that number of shares of the Company's common stock which
equals the exercise price of the Right divided by one-half of the current market
price of such common stock at the date of the occurrence of the event
("Triggering Event"). After the occurrence of a Triggering Event, the Company's
Board of Directors may, at their option, exchange one share of common stock or
one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Stock for each Right (other than Rights
held by the 10 percent or more shareholder). In addition, if the Company is
involved in a merger or other business combination transaction with another
person or group in which it is not the surviving corporation or in connection
with which its common stock is changed or converted, or it sells or transfers 50
percent or more of its assets or earning power to another person, each Right
that has not previously been exercised will entitle its holder (other than the
10 percent or more shareholder) to purchase that number of shares of common
stock of such other person which equals the exercise price of the Right divided
by one-half of the current market price of such common stock at the date of the
occurrence of the event.
The Company will generally be entitled to redeem the Rights at $.01 per
Right at any time until the 10th day following public announcement that a 10
percent stock position has been acquired and in certain other circumstances. The
Rights will expire on September 2, 2006, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged.
-27-
<PAGE> 29
In 1989, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to
1,000,000 shares of its common stock. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had
purchased 435,625 shares under this authorization.
<TABLE>
The following summarizes the changes in selected shareholders' equity
accounts for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996:
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Cumulative Treasury Stock
-------------------- Additional Translation -------------------
(In thousands, except share data) Shares Par Value Capital Adjustment Shares Cost
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 6,340,430 $6,340 $11,246 $(5,844) (24,590) $(785)
Stock options exercised and related tax benefit 56,140 57 1,024 - - -
Translation adjustments and gains and losses
from certain inter-company balances - - - 916 - -
Purchase of treasury shares - - - - (60) (2)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 1994 6,396,570 6,397 12,270 (4,928) (24,650) (787)
Stock options exercised and related tax benefit 1,000 1 13 - - -
Translation adjustments and gains and losses
from certain inter-company balances - - - 310 - -
Restricted stock issuances 105,000 105 1,299 - - -
Deferred compensation - - (1,404) - - -
Purchase of treasury shares - - - - (110) (2)
Reissuance of treasury shares - - - - 1,140 38
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 1995 6,502,570 6,503 12,178 (4,618) (23,620) (751)
Stock issued for Director compensation 4,685 4 69 - - -
Translation adjustments and gains and losses
from certain inter-company balances - - - 2,781 - -
Restricted stock issuances 145,000 145 1,873 - - -
Deferred compensation - - (1,951) - - -
Restricted stock forfeiture (5,000) (5) (62) - - -
Purchase of treasury shares - - - - (410) (6)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 1996 6,647,255 $6,647 $12,107 $(1,837) (24,030) $(757)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Stock Option and Stock Award Plans
The Company has four stock compensation plans at December 31, 1996: the 1980
Stock Award Plan ("1980 plan"), the 1987 Stock Option Plan ("1987 plan"), the
1993 Stock Incentive Plan ("1993 plan"), and the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan
("1996 plan"). Awards may no longer be granted under the 1980 plan, the 1987
plan and the 1993 plan. Awards under the 1996 plan are made at the discretion of
the Leadership and Compensation Committee (formerly the Executive Salary
Committee) of the Board of Directors ("the Committee").
Under the 1980 plan, stock options awarded which are outstanding at
December 31, 1996, are currently exercisable and expire on the tenth anniversary
of the date of grant.
Under the 1987 plan, nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options
have been awarded and become exercisable either (a) 50 percent on the first
anniversary of grant and the remainder on the second anniversary of grant, (b)
100 percent at six months from the date of grant, (c) 100 percent at one year
from the date of grant, or (d) otherwise as determined by the Committee. Certain
options may become exercisable immediately in the event of a change of control
as defined under this plan. Nonqualified stock options expire 10 years and one
day from the date of grant, and incentive stock options expire 10 years from the
date of grant.
Under the 1993 plan, nonstatutory stock options, incentive stock options
and shares of performance based restricted stock have been awarded. Under the
1996 plan, nonstatutory stock options, incentive stock options and shares of
performance based restricted stock may be awarded. Stock options under both
plans generally become exercisable either (a) 50 percent on the first
anniversary of grant and the remainder on the second anniversary of grant, (b)
100 percent at one year from the date of grant, or (c) otherwise as determined
by the Committee. Certain options may become exercisable immediately in the
event of a change in control as defined under these plans. Nonstatutory stock
options under both plans expire 10 years and one day from the date of grant, and
incentive stock options expire 10 years from the date of grant. Performance
based restricted stock awards under both plans have been granted to certain key
executives and are earned only if the closing price of the Company's common
stock meets specific target prices for certain defined periods of time. During
1996, the Company granted 120,000 shares of performance based restricted stock
under the 1993 plan and 25,000 shares of performance based restricted stock
under the 1996 plan. Under both plans, restrictions on such shares lapse in
equal amounts when the average closing price of the Company's common stock
reaches $20, $25 and $30, respectively, for a consecutive 30 trading day period.
Shares issued under the plans are initially recorded at their fair market value
on the date of grant with a corresponding charge to additional capital
representing the unearned portion of the award. Shares of performance based
restricted stock are forfeited if the specified average closing prices of the
Company's common stock are not met within five years of grant or the executive
leaves the Company.
-28-
<PAGE> 30
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the 1987 plan, certain
option holders may, with respect to stock option agreements which so provide,
have a limited right with respect to options under the plans to elect to
surrender the options and receive cash or shares equal in value to the
difference between the option price and the larger of either the highest
reported price per share on the New York Stock Exchange during the sixty-day
period before the change in control or, if the change in control is the result
of certain defined transactions, the highest price per share paid in such
defined transactions. In respect of holders of performance based restricted
stock, any time limitations shall lapse and such stock becomes fully vested,
provided performance conditions have been met.
<TABLE>
A summary of the status of the Company's fixed stock option plans as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and changes during the years ended on those dates is
presented below:
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding beginning of year 505,909 $22.88 385,834 $29.06
Granted 150,000 11.86 298,500 17.24
Exercised - - (1,000) 13.75
Forfeited - non-vested (35,775) 17.39 (88,775) 23.22
Forfeited - exercisable (147,520) 28.22 (88,650) 30.56
Expired (2,900) 19.38 - -
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding end of year 469,714 $18.12 505,909 $22.88
Options exercisable at end of year 251,214 $22.04 239,459 $28.80
Weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year (exercise price equals market price) $ 4.88 $ 4.92
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 1996:
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
Number Average Weighted Number Weighted
Outstanding at Remaining Average Exercisable at Average
Range of Exercise Prices 12/31/96 Contractual Life Exercise Price 12/31/96 Exercise Price
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 9.63 - $14.38 191,200 9.1 years $11.70 52,850 $12.99
15.75 - 22.63 165,650 8.6 years 18.19 85,500 18.58
25.50 - 29.50 72,564 6.2 years 26.43 72,564 26.43
30.25 - 34.63 40,300 2.8 years 33.35 40,300 33.35
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 9.63 - $34.63 469,714 8.0 years $18.12 251,214 $22.04
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
The number and weighted average fair value per share of restricted stock granted
during 1996 and in 1995 is as follows:
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Restricted Stock:
Number of shares 145,000 105,000
Weighted average fair value per restricted share $ 2.06 $ 2.56
Weighted average share price at grant date $13.91 $13.38
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"
issued in October 1995. The Company continues to measure compensation cost using
the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion 25. If
the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value
of the options and restricted stock granted at grant date as prescribed by SFAS
No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro
forma amounts indicated below:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) - as reported $24,194 $(14,731)
Net income (loss) - pro forma $23,445 $(15,188)
Earnings (loss) per share - as reported $ 3.78 $ (2.31)
Earnings (loss) per share - pro forma $ 3.66 $ (2.38)
</TABLE>
-29-
<PAGE> 31
<TABLE>
The assumptions and methods used in estimating the fair value at the grant date
of options and restricted shares granted are listed below:
<CAPTION>
Grant Year
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Volatility of Share Price:
Options 31.0% 28.0%
Restricted stock 6.0% 6.0%
Dividend Yield:
Options - 2.9%
Restricted stock - -
Interest Rate:
Options 6.2% 6.4%
Restricted stock 5.6% 5.7%
Expected Life of Options 5.6 years 5.9 years
Valuation Methodology:
Options Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model
Restricted stock Binomial Pricing Model
</TABLE>
Because the determination of the fair value of all options granted includes
vesting periods over several years and additional option grants are expected to
be made each year, the above pro forma disclosures are not representative of pro
forma effects of reported net income for future periods.
Commitments and Contingencies
Rent expense for office equipment, facilities and vehicles was $2.6 million,
$2.5 million and $2.1 million for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. At December
31, 1996, the Company was committed, under non-cancelable operating leases, to
minimum annual rentals as follows: 1997 - $2 million; 1998 - $1.7 million; 1999
- - $1.6 million; 2000 - $1.4 million; thereafter - $11 million.
At December 31, 1996, the Company was obligated under approximately $3.7
million in standby letters of credit.
In April 1994, Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Ricoh Corporation ("Ricoh") filed a
Complaint with the United States District Court, District of New Hampshire,
alleging the Company's infringement of the U.S. patents 4,611,730 and 4,878,603
relating to certain toner cartridges for Ricoh copiers. The Complaint seeks
damages and injunctive relief. The case was tried in the second quarter of 1996.
The Company believes it has substantial defenses but it cannot predict the
outcome. Ricoh alleged that its damages, if it were successful on the merits,
would be approximately $10 million as of the date of the trial, and the Company
alleged that even if Ricoh were to prevail that such damages should be in the
range of $.1 million to $.4 million. Ricoh also is seeking treble damages and
attorneys' fees for willful infringement, but the Company believes an award for
such damages is unlikely. The Company is awaiting the Court's decision.
In August and September 1996, two individual plaintiffs initiated lawsuits
against the Company, Cerion, certain directors and officers of Cerion, and the
Company's underwriter, on behalf of classes consisting of all persons who
purchased the common stock of Cerion between May 24, 1996 and July 9, 1996. The
complaints allege that, in connection with the Cerion initial public offering,
the defendants issued certain materially false and misleading statements and
omitted the disclosure of material facts, in particular, certain matters
concerning significant customer relationships. The complaints seek damages and
injunctive relief. The Company believes these lawsuits are without merit and it
has substantial defenses and intends to vigorously defend against these actions.
The Company is involved in certain environmental matters and has been
designated by the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") as a "potentially
responsible party" ("PRP") for certain hazardous waste sites. In addition, the
Company has been notified by certain state environmental agencies that some of
the Company sites not addressed by the EPA require remedial action. These sites
are in various stages of investigation and remediation. Due to the unique
physical characteristics of each site, the technology employed, the extended
timeframes of each remediation, the interpretation of applicable laws and
regulations and the financial viability of other potential participants, the
ultimate cost to the Company of remediation for each site is difficult to
determine. At December 31, 1996, based on the facts currently known and the
Company's prior experience with these matters, the Company has concluded that
there is at least a reasonable possibility that site assessment, remediation and
monitoring costs will be incurred by the Company with respect to those sites
which can be reasonably estimated in the aggregate range of $1.4 million to $1.6
million. This range is based, in part, on an allocation of certain sites' costs
which, due to the joint and several nature of the liability, could increase if
the other PRPs are unable to bear their allocated share. At December 31, 1996,
the Company has accrued $1.6 million which represents, in management's view, the
most likely amount within the range stated above. Based on information currently
available to the Company, management believes that it is probable that the major
responsible parties will fully pay the costs apportioned to them. Management
believes that, based on its financial position and the estimated environmental
accrual recorded, its remediation expense with respect to those sites is not
likely to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
-30-
<PAGE> 32
Postretirement Benefits
Pension Plans: The Company and its subsidiaries have several pension plans which
cover substantially all of its regular full-time employees. Benefits under these
plans are generally based on years of service and the levels of compensation
during those years. The Company's policy is to fund amounts deductible for
income tax purposes. Assets of the plans are invested in common stocks,
fixed-income securities and interest-bearing cash equivalent instruments.
<TABLE>
Net periodic pension cost from continuing operations for the plans,
exclusive of enhanced early retirement and curtailment pension costs, includes
the following components:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost-benefits earned during the period $ 2,890 $ 2,490 $ 2,771
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 8,709 8,581 7,916
Actual return on plan assets (15,491) (23,622) 1,826
Net amortization and deferral 6,137 15,281 (9,491)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic pension cost $ 2,245 $ 2,730 $ 3,022
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
In February 1994, the Company offered certain of its United States employee
groups an enhanced early retirement pension benefit. The cost of the enhanced
pension benefit was $4.2 million, $2.2 million of which was attributable to
discontinued operations. In 1996, the Company recognized a curtailment expense
of $.3 million relating to the Tape Products Division sale.
<TABLE>
The following sets forth the funded status of the plans and the amounts
recognized in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1996:
<CAPTION>
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) Less Than Assets Exceeds Assets
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of:
Vested benefit obligation $113,000 $ 2,682
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated benefit obligation $113,460 $ 2,682
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligation $115,990 $ 2,695
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market value of plan assets $126,687 $ -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan assets in excess of (less than) projected benefit obligation $ 10,697 $(2,695)
Unrecognized transition (asset) obligation (249) 55
Unrecognized prior service costs 4,342 600
Unrecognized net gain (20,811) (338)
Additional liability - (304)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accrued pension cost $ (6,021) $(2,682)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
The following sets forth the funded status of the plans and the amounts
recognized in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1995:
<CAPTION>
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) Less Than Assets Exceeds Assets
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of:
Vested benefit obligation $49,661 $68,399
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated benefit obligation $49,855 $68,557
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligation $50,284 $70,696
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market value of plan assets $54,511 $62,583
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan assets in excess of (less than) projected benefit obligation $ 4,227 $(8,113)
Unrecognized transition (asset) obligation (1,929) 2,025
Unrecognized prior service costs 1,322 4,297
Unrecognized net gain (2,140) (7,368)
Additional liability - (617)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prepaid (accrued) pension cost $ 1,480 $(9,776)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
-31-
<PAGE> 33
Approximately $10.3 million and $4.2 million of the accrued pension cost for
1996 and 1995, respectively, are included in "Other Long-Term Liabilities" in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
<TABLE>
The significant actuarial assumptions used for the plans' valuations were:
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Weighted average discount rate 7.8% 7.4%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 9.7% 9.7%
Rate of increase in future compensation levels 5.1% 5.1%
</TABLE>
Retiree Health Care and Other Benefits: The Company provides certain health care
and other benefits to eligible retired employees and their spouses. Salaried
participants generally become eligible for retiree health care benefits after
reaching age 60 with ten years of service. Benefits, eligibility and
cost-sharing provisions for hourly employees vary by location or bargaining
unit. Generally, the medical plans are fully insured managed care plans. In
1993, the postretirement benefit plan was changed to share the cost of benefits
with all retirees, resulting in an unrecognized benefit which is being amortized
over the future service period of the active employees. The cost sharing change
related primarily to the Tape Products Division workforce and as a result of the
Tape Products Division sale, the Company included the recognition of a $3.6
million benefit in the gain on the disposal. Also, $1.5 million of
postretirement liabilities were assumed by the new owner of the Tape Products
Division.
<TABLE>
The following table sets forth the funded status of the plans, reconciled
to the accrued postretirement benefit cost recognized in the Company's balance
sheet:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands) 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees $ 6,505 $ 7,143
Fully eligible active plan participants 1,039 1,483
Other active participants 675 1,815
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market value of plan assets - -
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
in excess of plan assets (8,219) (10,441)
Unrecognized prior service benefit (818) (4,589)
Unrecognized net gain (2,762) (2,208)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accrued postretirement benefit cost $(11,799) $(17,238)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Approximately $11.1 million and $16.5 million of accrued postretirement benefits
for 1996 and 1995, respectively, are included in "Other Long-Term Liabilities"
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
<TABLE>
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost of continuing operations,
exclusive of enhanced early retirement costs, included the following components:
<CAPTION>
(In thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost of benefits earned $ 81 $ 85 $ 133
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation 620 768 942
Amortization of prior service benefit (370) (724) (554)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $ 331 $ 129 $ 521
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
As part of the 1994 early retirement program, the Company offered certain of its
United States employee groups an enhanced early retirement health care benefit.
The cost of the enhanced health care benefit was $1.5 million, $.9 million of
which was attributable to discontinued operations. At December 31, 1994, the
postretirement benefit plans were amended to transfer the cost of health
supplemental benefit payments to the Company's pension plan.
For measurement purposes, a 5.5 percent annual rate of increase in the cost
of medical benefits was assumed for the various plans in 1996. This rate was
assumed to decrease gradually to 5 percent in 1999 and remain at that level
thereafter. The discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation was 7.75 percent.
If the future health care cost trend rate were increased 1 percent, the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1996 would have
increased by 1 percent. The effect of this assumed change on the aggregate of
service and interest cost for 1996 would have been an increase of 6 percent.
-32-
<PAGE> 34
Information About Operations
<TABLE>
The Company conducts business in three segments: Commercial Products Group,
Photo Group and Cerion. The Commercial Products Group produces and sells
facsimile and thermal papers, pressure-sensitive labels, specialty papers, and
copier and laser printer supplies primarily to domestic resellers, original
equipment manufacturers and private label distributors. The Photo Group provides
photo related services to amateur photographers through mail-order in North
America, the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, as well as through retail
establishments in Northern Ireland and The Republic of Ireland. Cerion
manufactures precision metallic parts primarily for the domestic computer
industry. As previously discussed in the Business Changes note, the Company and
Cerion completed an initial public offering of common stock in May 1996. As a
result of the public offering, the Company's ownership of Cerion was reduced to
37.1 percent, and accordingly, the Company now uses the equity method of
accounting for its investment in Cerion common stock. Net sales, operating
income and identifiable assets of the Company's three business segments and the
geographic areas in which they operate are set forth below:
<CAPTION>
Net Sales From Income (Loss) From
Continuing Operations Continuing Operations Identifiable Assets
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In millions) 1996 1995 1994 1996(a) 1995(b) 1994(c) 1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
By Business
Commercial Products $199.0 $245.5 $259.5 $ 1.7 $(20.4) $(4.0) $ 77.5 $ 84.3 $105.2
Photo 171.4 179.2 145.4 (5.7) 7.2 16.4 75.7 83.5 58.1
Cerion Technologies 19.3 27.5 14.0 44.4 6.0 (.2) 7.2 12.4 7.4
Corporate expenses
and assets - - - (11.8) (12.9) (8.2) 16.3 37.1 40.8
Discontinued Operations - - - - - - - 14.1 16.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated $389.7 $452.2 $418.9 $ 28.6 $(20.1) $ 4.0 $176.7 $231.4 $227.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Geographic Area
United States $296.7 $349.8 $357.5 $ 46.1 $(11.2) $ 6.3 $105.0 $112.6 $133.8
Europe 87.3 95.5 53.6 (5.8) 3.0 5.0 52.2 62.5 33.3
Other 5.7 6.9 7.8 .1 1.0 .9 3.2 5.1 3.6
Corporate expenses
and assets - - - (11.8) (12.9) (8.2) 16.3 37.1 40.8
Discontinued Operations - - - - - - - 14.1 16.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated $389.7 $452.2 $418.9 $ 28.6 $(20.1) $ 4.0 $176.7 $231.4 $227.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
Sales between business segments are insignificant. Intrasegment sales between geographic areas are generally priced at the
lowest price offered to unaffiliated customers.
(a) Includes restructuring and other unusual income (charges) of $3.1 million, $(8.9) million and $(1.4) million for
Commercial Products Group, Photo Group and Corporate, respectively. Also includes gains of $32 million from the sale of
Cerion stock and $7.3 million from the Company's interest in shares sold by Cerion.
(b) Includes restructuring and other unusual charges of $14.3 million and $1.9 million for Commercial Products Group and
Corporate, respectively.
(c) Includes restructuring and other unusual charges of $2.6 million for Commercial Products Group.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization by business segment are
set forth below:
<CAPTION>
Capital Expenditures Depreciation and Amortization
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commercial Products Group $ 5.7 $ 8.6 $11.1 $ 8.7 $ 8.3 $ 7.9
Photo Group 4.0 2.5 3.8 8.0 8.3 5.4
Cerion Technologies 3.1 2.1 1.0 .8 .8 .8
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated $12.8 $13.2 $15.9 $17.5 $17.4 $14.1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
-33-
<PAGE> 35
<TABLE>
Quarterly Operating Results and Common Stock Information (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
(In millions, except per share data) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
Net sales $101.5 $103.6 $100.9 $83.7 $389.7
Gross profit(1) 24.1 28.1 29.0 22.1 103.3
Income (loss) from continuing operations(2) (2.2) 18.7 .5 (.5) 16.5
Income from discontinued operations .2 .3 - - .5
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation - 8.4 - - 8.4
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss (2.0) 27.4 .5 (.5) 25.4
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt - (1.2) - - (1.2)
Net income (loss)(2) (2.0) 26.2 .5 (.5) 24.2
Earnings (loss) per common and common
equivalent share:
Continuing operations(2) (.35) 2.91 .08 (.07) 2.58
Discontinued operations .03 .05 - - .08
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation - 1.32 - - 1.32
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss (.32) 4.28 .08 (.07) 3.98
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt - (.20) - - (.20)
Net income (loss)(2) (.32) 4.08 .08 (.07) 3.78
Dividends - - - - -
Market price:
High 14 3/4 19 5/8 15 16 1/8 19 5/8
Low 9 1/8 12 3/8 12 5/8 11 7/8 9 1/8
1995
Net sales $109.6 $122.2 $121.7 $98.7 $452.2
Gross profit(1) 25.9 31.6 31.2 21.2 109.9
Income (loss) from continuing operations(3) .1 1.5 (7.3) (9.7) (15.4)
Income from discontinued operations - .4 - .3 .7
Net income (loss)(3) .1 1.9 (7.3) (9.4) (14.7)
Earnings (loss) per common and common
equivalent share:
Continuing operations(3) .01 .23 (1.15) (1.53) (2.43)
Discontinued operations - .06 .01 .06 .12
Net income (loss)(3) .01 .29 (1.14) (1.47) (2.31)
Dividends .18 .18 .18 - .54
Market price:
High 21 20 19 1/4 16 7/8 21
Low 18 1/2 18 5/8 14 3/4 12 1/4 12 1/4
<FN>
(1) Beginning in the fourth quarter of 1996, postage expenses related to prepaid photo mailers, which previously were treated as
selling expenses, were reclassified to cost of products sold. Such expenses amounted to $2.1 million, $2.5 million, $3.2 million
and $2 million for the four quarters of 1996, and $1 million, $1.7 million, $2.1 million and $1.5 million for the four quarters
of 1995.
(2) The second quarter includes gains of $32 million from the sale of Cerion stock, and $7.3 million from the Company's interest
in the shares sold by Cerion, and an unusual charge of $7 million for the write-down of goodwill in the mainland European photo
business. The fourth quarter includes restructuring and other unusual items of $.2 million.
(3) The third quarter includes restructuring and other unusual charges of $8.2 million and a valuation allowance of $3 million
against tax assets due to the probability that such assets will not be realized. The fourth quarter includes restructuring and
other unusual charges of $8 million.
</TABLE>
The Company's stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. At December 31,
1996, there were 1,435 record holders of the Company's common stock.
-34-
<PAGE> 36
Report of Independent Accountants
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Nashua Corporation:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related
consolidated statements of operations and retained earnings and of cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nashua
Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed
above.
Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 5, 1997
-35-
<PAGE> 37
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
- ------- -----------------------------------------------------------
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
------------------------
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
- -------- --------------------------------------------------
The section entitled "Nominees for Election as Directors", which appears on
pages 2 through 4 of the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 25, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. See also the section entitled
"Executive Officers of the Registrant" appearing in Part I hereof.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
- -------- ----------------------
The section entitled "Compensation of Directors" and "Compensation of
Executive Officers," appears on page 5 through 7 of the Company's Proxy
Statement dated March 25, 1997, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
- -------- --------------------------------------------------------------
The sections entitled "Security Ownership of Management" and "Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners," which appear on pages 13 through 15 of
the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 25, 1997, are incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
- -------- ----------------------------------------------
The section entitled "Certain Transactions and Indebtedness," which appears
on page 9 of the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 25, 1997, is incorporated
by reference in this Form 10-K.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
- -------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Accountants (see page 35)
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and 1995
(see page 20)
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996
(see page 19)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1996 (see page 21)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (see pages
22 through 34)
-36-
<PAGE> 38
(2) Financial Statement Schedule
Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement
Schedule
For the three years ended December 31, 1996:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements
or the Notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits:
--------
2.01 Purchase and Sale Agreement, by and among Nashua Corporation
and subsidiaries and Nexus Photo Limited and subsidiaries.
Exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K dated January 13, 1995,
and incorporated herein by reference.
3.01 Composite Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as
amended. Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1989, and incorporated
herein by reference.
3.02 By-laws of the Company, as amended. Exhibit to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10- K for the year ended December 31,
1989, and incorporated herein by reference.
4.01 Note Agreement dated as of September 13, 1991. Exhibit to the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991, and
incorporated herein by reference
4.02 Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 31, 1991 to the Note
Agreement dated September 13, 1991. Exhibit to the Company's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, and incorporated
herein by reference.
4.03 Amendment No. 2 dated as of January 27, 1994 to the Note
Agreement dated September 13, 1991. Exhibit to the Company's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, and incorporated
herein by reference.
4.04 Amendment No. 3 dated as of May 12, 1994 to the Note Agreement
dated September 13, 1991. Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by
reference.
4.05 Amendment No. 4 dated as of December 31, 1994 to the Note
Agreement dated September 13, 1991. Exhibit to the Company's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated
herein by reference.
4.06 Amended and restated Note Agreement dated April 5, 1996. Exhibit
to the Company's 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29,
1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.07 Allonge dated December 31, 1994 to the Note Agreement dated
September 13, 1991. Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by
reference.
-37-
<PAGE> 39
4.08 Credit Agreement dated as of January 5, 1995. Exhibit to the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.09 Amended and restated Credit Agreement dated April 5, 1996.
Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 29, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.10 Rights Agreement, dated as of July 19, 1996, between the Company
and The First National Bank of Boston, as Rights Agent, which
includes as Exhibit A the Form of Certificate of Designations,
as Exhibit B the Form of Rights Certificate, and as Exhibit C
the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock. Exhibit to
the Company's Form 8-K dated August 28, 1996 and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.01 Management Incentive Compensation Program of the Company, as
amended 1993. Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference.(1)
10.02 1980 Stock Award Plan of the Company, as amended. Exhibit to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1981, and incorporated herein by reference.(1)
10.03 1987 Stock Option Plan of the Company. Exhibit to the Company's
Proxy Statement dated March 24, 1987, incorporated herein by
reference.(1)
10.04 Amendments to Nashua Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan
effective as of April 28, 1989. Exhibit to the Company's Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1989, and
incorporated herein by reference.(1)
10.05 1993 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company. Exhibit to the
Company's Proxy Statement dated March 19, 1993, and
incorporated herein by reference.(1)
10.06 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company. Exhibit to the
Company's Proxy Statement dated May 15, 1996 and incorporated
by reference.(1)
10.07 Employment Agreement dated December 18, 1995 between the Company
and Gerald G. Garbacz. Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated
herein by reference.(1)
10.08 Employment Agreement dated April 28, 1989 between the Company
and Daniel M. Junius. Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated
herein by reference.(1)
10.09 Employment Agreement dated November 3, 1995 between the Company
and Robin J.T. Clabburn. Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and
incorporated herein by reference.(1)
10.10 Employment Agreement dated February 24, 1995 between the Company
and Bruce T. Wright. Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated
herein by reference.(1)
-38-
<PAGE> 40
10.11 Employment Agreement dated September 22, 1995 between the
Company and Charles E. Turnbull. Exhibit to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and
incorporated herein by reference.(1)
10.12 Employment Agreement dated April 28, 1989 between the Company
and Paul Buffum. Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 28, 1996 and incorporated herein by
reference.(1)
10.13 Employment Agreement dated May 3, 1996 between the Company and
Michael D. Jeans. Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 28, 1996 and incorporated herein by
reference.(1)
11.01 Statement regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share and Common
Equivalent Share.
21.01 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.01 Consent of Independent Accountants.
24.01 Powers of Attorney.
(1) Management contract or compensation plan identified
pursuant to Item 14(a)(3).
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On April 18, 1996, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K regarding
the sale of the Tape Products Division.
On May 15, 1996, the Company filed a Form 8-K/A regarding the sale of
the Tape Products Division and the initial public offering of Cerion
Technologies common stock.
On June 4, 1996, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K regarding the
sale of the Tape Products Division and the initial public offering of
Cerion Technologies common stock.
On August 28, 1996, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K regarding
the adoption of a Shareholder Rights Plan.
On December 12, 1996, the Company filed a Form 8-K regarding the sale
of its mainland European photo business.
-39-
<PAGE> 41
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NASHUA CORPORATION
Date: March 26, 1997 By /s/Daniel M. Junius
--------------------
Daniel M. Junius
Vice President-Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- --------- ----- ----
/s/Gerald G. Garbacz President and March 26, 1997
- ----------------------- Chief Executive Officer
Gerald G. Garbacz
/s/Daniel M. Junius Vice President-Finance, March 26, 1997
- ----------------------- Chief Financial Officer
Daniel M. Junius and Treasurer
/s/Joseph R. Matson Corporate Controller and March 26, 1997
- ----------------------- Chief Accounting Officer
Joseph R. Matson
Sheldon A. Buckler* Director
- -----------------------
Sheldon A. Buckler
Charles Hoppin* Director
- -----------------------
Charles Hoppin
John M. Kucharski* Director
- -----------------------
John M. Kucharski
David C. Miller, Jr.* Director
- -----------------------
David C. Miller, Jr.
James F. Orr III* Director
- -----------------------
James F. Orr III
*By /s/Daniel M. Junius March 26, 1997
-------------------
Daniel M. Junius
Attorney-In-Fact
-40-
<PAGE> 42
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
---------------------------------
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
-------------------------------
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
NASHUA CORPORATION
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated February 5, 1997 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K also
included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedule listed in Item 14(a) of
this Form 10-K. In our opinion, the Financial Statement Schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 5, 1997
-41-
<PAGE> 43
SCHEDULE II
-----------
<TABLE>
NASHUA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
-----------------------------------
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
---------------------------------
(In Thousands)
<CAPTION>
Balance at
Previous Balance at
Description End of Year Additions Deductions End of Year
- ----------- ----------- --------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
DECEMBER 31, 1996:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $2,397 $ 558(a) $(1,071)(b) $1,884
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets 3,300 - (2,972)(e) 328
DECEMBER 31, 1995:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $2,628 $1,717(a) $(1,948)(b)(c) $2,397
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets - 3,300(d) - 3,300
DECEMBER 31, 1994:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,883 $1,374(a) $ (629)(b) $2,628
<FN>
(a) Charged to costs and expenses.
(b) Accounts deemed uncollectible.
(c) Includes decrease of $270 due to restatement of discontinued operations.
(d) Charged to income tax expense.
(e) Tax assets deemed unrealizable.
</TABLE>
-42-
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 11.01
-------------
<TABLE>
NASHUA CORPORATION
------------------
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
--------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- -------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations $16,493 $(15,470) $2,210
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 524 739 (63)
Gain on sale of discontinued operation, net of taxes 8,434 - -
------- -------- ------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss 25,451 (14,731) 2,147
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax benefit (1,257) - -
------- -------- ------
Net income (loss) $24,194 $(14,731) $2,147
======= ======== ======
Shares:
Weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period 6,378 6,374 6,343
Common equivalent shares 24 - 17
------- -------- ------
6,402 6,374 6,360
======= ======== ======
Earnings (loss) per common share(1):
Income (loss) from continuing operations $ 2.58 $ (2.43) $ .35
Income (loss) from discontinued operations .08 .12 (.01)
Gain on sale of discontinued operation 1.32 - -
------- -------- ------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss 3.98 (2.31) .34
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt (.20) - -
------- -------- ------
Net income (loss) $3.78 $ (2.31) $ .34
======= ======== ======
<FN>
(1) The computation of earnings (loss) per common share on a fully diluted basis results in no change to the earnings
per common share amounts indicated above.
</TABLE>
-43-
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21.01
-------------
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
------------------------------
Nashua Corporation, or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns beneficially,
directly or indirectly, all of the capital stock in the following subsidiaries:
Jurisdiction of
Domestic Incorporation
- -------- ---------------
Cerion Holdings Inc. (1)(5) Delaware
Nashua Belmont Limited (2) Delaware
Nashua International, Inc. (1) Delaware
Nashua Commercial Products Corporation (1) Delaware
Nashua Photo European Investments, Inc.(2) Delaware
Nashua Photo Inc.(1) Delaware
Nashua Photo International Investments, Inc.(2) Delaware
Nashua Photo Licensing Inc.(2) Delaware
Nashua P.R. Inc. (1) Delaware
Nippon Nashua Incorporated (1) Delaware
Promolink Corporation(1) Delaware
Jurisdiction of
Foreign Incorporation
- ------- ---------------
Nashua Europe B.V. (1) Netherlands
Nashua FSC Limited (1) Jamaica
Nashua Photo B.V. (2) Netherlands
Nashua Photo Limited (2) Canada
Nashua Photo Limited (2) England
Nashua Photo S.N.C.(3) France
Postal Film Services (Country-Wide) Limited (4) England
- ---------------
All of the above listed subsidiaries are included in Nashua's consolidated
financial statements.
(1) Stock held by Nashua Corporation
(2) Stock held by Nashua Photo Inc.
(3) Stock held 50% by Nashua Photo European Investments, Inc. and 50% by Nashua
Photo International Investments, Inc.
(4) Stock held by Nashua Photo Limited (England)
(5) Cerion Holdings Inc. owns 37% of Cerion Technologies Inc., a Delaware
Corporation.
-44-
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.01
-------------
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
----------------------------------
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 2-88669, No. 33-13995, No. 33-67940, No. 33-72438
and No. 333-06025) of Nashua Corporation of our report dated February 5, 1997
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.
Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1997
-45-
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 24.01
-------------
Commission File No. 1-5492-1
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
Know All Men By These Presents, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Daniel M. Junius and Paul Buffum and each of them, as
true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign Nashua Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and every act and thing requisite and necessary to
be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Signature Title Date
- --------- ----- ----
/s/James F. Orr III Director March 26, 1997
- ------------------------ --------------
James F. Orr III
/s/Sheldon A. Buckler Director March 26, 1997
- ------------------------ --------------
Sheldon A. Buckler
/s/John M. Kucharski Director March 26, 1997
- ------------------------ --------------
John M. Kucharski
/s/David C. Miller Director March 26, 1997
- ------------------------ --------------
David C. Miller
/s/Charles S. Hoppin Director March 26, 1997
- ------------------------ --------------
Charles S. Hoppin
-46-
