SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss. 240.14a-11(c) or ss. 240.14a-12
......................REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V..........................
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
................................................................................
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required
[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: . .
. . . . . . . Limited Partnership Interests........................
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: . . .
. . . . . . 3904 Units, each of which consists of two limited
partnership interests..............................................
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): . .
. . . . . . . $201.................................................
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
. . . . . . . . . $1,571,673......................................
5) Total fee paid:
. . . . . . . . . $314............................................
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11-(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount Previously Paid:
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:
656661.11
<PAGE>
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V
9090 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
___________ __, 1998
To the Limited Partners:
National Partnership Investments Corp., a California corporation ("NAPICO") and
National Partnership Investments Associates II, a California limited partnership
("NPIA"), the general partners (the "General Partners") of Real Estate
Associates Limited V (the "Partnership"), are writing to recommend, and seek
your consent to, (i) a proposed sale of all of the interests of the Partnership
in the real estate assets (the "Real Estate Interests") of the nineteen limited
partnerships affiliated with the Partnership (the "Local Partnerships") to a
real estate investment trust or its designated affiliate (collectively referred
to as the "REIT") to be organized by Casden Properties, a California general
partnership, and certain of its affiliates (collectively referred to as
"Casden"); and (ii) certain amendments (the "Amendments") to the Partnership's
Agreement of Limited Partnership necessary to permit such sale. Eighteen of the
nineteen Local Partnerships each own a low income housing project (each of which
is referred to herein as a "Property") that is subsidized and/or has a mortgage
note payable to or insured by agencies of the federal government or a local
housing agency. The transactions by which the Partnership proposes to sell the
Real Estate Interests to the REIT and amend its Agreement of Limited Partnership
are hereinafter referred to as the "Sale".
In evaluating the proposed Sale, the Limited Partners should note that:
o Based upon a purchase price for the Real Estate Interests of
$53,789,555, which is payable $1,571,673 in cash and $52,217,882 by
assumption by the REIT of certain mortgage indebtedness, it is
anticipated that the Partnership will make a distribution out of the
proceeds of the Sale and the available cash of the Partnership of
approximately $787 per unit, each unit consisting of two limited
partnership interests, which were sold at an original cost of $5,000
per unit in the Partnership, which amount is anticipated to be
sufficient to pay any federal and state income taxes that would be due
in connection with the Sale, assuming (i) that Limited Partners have
suspended passive losses of $5,062 per unit from the Partnership; (ii)
that such losses are available to offset ordinary income taxed at the
39.6% marginal federal rate; and (iii) federal and effective state
capital gains rates of 25% and 5%, respectively.
o The General Partners believe that now may be an opportune time for the
Partnership to sell the Real Estate Interests, given current conditions
in the real estate and capital markets, which has enabled Casden to
make the proposal to the Partnership described in the enclosed
materials.
o Robert A. Stanger & Company., Inc., a recognized independent investment
banking firm, has determined that, subject to the assumptions,
limitations and qualifications contained in its opinion, the valuation
ascribed to the Properties in connection with determining the Purchase
Price to be received by the Partnership for the Real Estate Interests
in the Sale is fair from a financial point of view to the Limited
Partners.
o The General Partners believe that selling the Partnership's entire
portfolio of real estate assets in a single transaction (as opposed to
a series of individual sales) will enable the Partnership to (i) reduce
transaction expenses, and (ii) dispose of its portfolio in an expedited
time frame. It should be noted that the Sale is conditioned upon, among
other things, the approval of the general partners of the nineteen
Local Partnerships. The Partnership will retain its interests in a
Property if the general partner for the Local Partnership holding such
Property does not approve the transfer.
656661.11
-1-
<PAGE>
o Most of the Properties are subject to Housing Assistance Payments
Contracts under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act. Most of
these contracts will expire by the end of 2003 and the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development will not renew them under
their current terms, which could ultimately have an adverse tax impact
on Limited Partners.
There are certain risk factors that the Limited Partners should consider in
evaluating the proposed Sale, such as:
o The Properties have not been marketed for sale to third parties and the
terms of the Sale have not been negotiated at arm's length.
o Casden is both an affiliate of the General Partners and the sponsor of
the REIT and, as discussed in the enclosed materials, would receive
substantial benefits as a result of the Sale and the successful
formation and capitalization of the REIT that will not be available to
Limited Partners.
o It is possible that Limited Partners could earn a higher return on
their investment in the Partnership if the Partnership were to retain
ownership of the Properties, then market and sell the Properties to
third parties for a higher aggregate purchase price at a later date.
o As a result of the Sale, the Partnership will not realize any potential
benefits of continuing to own the Properties.
o The Sale will have a tax impact on Limited Partners. For Limited
Partners who have been able to use all of the passive losses generated
by the Partnership on a current basis, the Sale should result in a
federal and state income tax cost of approximately $1,822 per Unit in
excess of the cash distribution. For Limited Partners who do not have
sufficient taxable income to be taxed at a 39.6% marginal federal rate
or who have other losses available to deduct against their taxable
income and therefore could not fully utilize their suspended passive
losses to offset their ordinary income, the sale could have a federal
and state tax cost in excess of cash distributions.
The REIT is to be formed by combining a substantial portion of Casden's
multi-family housing assets, which consist of real estate businesses and
property interests, with properties acquired from several Casden-sponsored
and/or managed partnerships and from third-party sellers. Casden will receive a
significant ownership interest in the REIT in exchange for contributing
substantially all of its multi-family housing assets to the REIT. The REIT
proposes to acquire the Real Estate Interests for cash, which it plans to raise
in connection with a private placement of its equity securities. The closing of
the Sale is subject to, among other things, (i) the consummation of such private
placement by the REIT; (ii) the consents of the general partners of the nineteen
Local Partnerships in which the Partnership holds interests; (iii) the approval
of the United State Department of Housing and Urban Development and certain
state housing finance agencies; and (iv) the consummation of a minimum number of
similar sales transactions with other Casden-affiliated partnerships.
If the Limited Partners do not approve the Sale, the Partnership will most
likely retain ownership of the Properties.
We urge you to carefully read the enclosed Consent Solicitation Statement in
order to vote your interests. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. BECAUSE APPROVAL REQUIRES
THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE OUTSTANDING UNITS OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP INTEREST, FAILURE TO VOTE WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE
AGAINST THE SALE. To be sure your vote is represented, please sign, date and
return the enclosed consent as promptly as possible.
The proposed Sale is fully described in the enclosed Consent Solicitation
Statement. Please read the enclosed materials carefully, then return your signed
consent form either by facsimile to ______________ or in the enclosed envelope
on or before ________ __, 1998.
656661.11
-2-
<PAGE>
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact ______________.
Very truly yours,
Bruce E. Nelson
President
National Partnership Investments Corp.
656661.11
-3-
<PAGE>
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V
9090 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
________ __, 1998
CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT
On the terms described in this Consent Solicitation Statement, National
Partnership Investments Corp., a California corporation ("NAPICO") and National
Partnership Investments Associates II, a California limited partnership
("NPIA"), the general partners of Real Estate Associates Limited V, a California
limited partnership (the "Partnership"), are seeking the consent of the Limited
Partners of the Partnership to (i) the sale of all of the interests of the
Partnership in the real estate assets (the "Real Estate Interests") of nineteen
limited partnerships affiliated with the Partnership (the "Local Partnerships")
to a real estate investment trust or its designated affiliate (collectively
referred to as the "REIT") to be organized by Casden Properties, a California
general partnership, and certain of its affiliates (collectively referred to
herein as "Casden") for a purchase price of $53,789,555 (the "Purchase Price"),
payable $1,571,673 in cash and $52,217,882 by assumption by the REIT of certain
mortgage indebtedness; and (ii) certain amendments to the Partnership's
agreement of limited partnership (the "Amendments"). Eighteen of the nineteen
LocalPartnerships each own a low income housing project (each of which is
referred to herein as a "Property"). Consents are also being sought from the
limited partners of certain other limited partnerships, the general partners of
which are affiliated with the General Partners (the Partnership and such other
limited partnerships are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Casden
Partnerships"), to allow the sale of certain real estate assets owned by the
Casden Partnerships to the REIT. The transactions by which the Partnership
proposes to sell the Real Estate Interests to the REIT and amend its Agreement
of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") are hereinafter referred to
as the "Sale." The series of transactions by which Casden proposes to form the
REIT and acquire certain real estate assets from the Casden Partnerships and
others is hereinafter referred to as the "REIT Transaction."
It is anticipated that the Partnership will make a distribution of
approximately $787 per unit of limited partnership interest in the Partnership
from the net proceeds of the Sale and available cash of the Partnership.
The Sale is conditioned upon, among other things, (i) approval of a
majority in interest of the Limited Partners of the Partnership; (ii) the
consummation of a private placement of the REIT's equity securities; (iii) the
consents of the general partners of the nineteen Local Partnerships in which the
Partnership holds an interest; (iv) the approval of the United States Department
of Housing and Urban Development and certain state housing finance agencies; and
(v) the consummation of a minimum number of real estate purchases from the
Casden Partnerships in connection with the REIT Transaction. If the Partnership
is unable to obtain a consent to the Sale from a general partner of a particular
Local Partnership, then the Real Estate Interests relating to such Local
Partnership will be retained by the Partnership and will be excluded from the
Sale.
The General Partners have approved the Sale, have concluded that the
Sale, including the Purchase Price for the Real Estate Interests, is fair to the
Limited Partners and recommend that the Limited Partners consent to the Sale.
Limited Partners should note, however, that the General Partners' recommendation
is subject to inherent conflicts of interest. See "CONFLICTS OF INTEREST."
This Consent Solicitation Statement and the accompanying form of
Consent of Limited Partner are first being mailed to Limited Partners on or
about ________ __, 1998.
THIS TRANSACTION HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERITS OF
SUCH TRANSACTION NOR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
THIS SOLICITATION OF CONSENTS EXPIRES
NO LATER THAN 11:59 P.M. EASTERN TIME
ON ________ __, 1998, UNLESS EXTENDED
656661.11
-1-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
<S> <C>
I. SUMMARY OF CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT.....................................................................1
The Partnership..............................................................................................1
The Sale.....................................................................................................1
Potential Benefits of the Sale...............................................................................2
Potential Adverse Effects of the Sale........................................................................4
Limited Partner Approval.....................................................................................7
Third-Party Opinion..........................................................................................7
Recommendation of the General Partners.......................................................................7
Conflicts of Interest........................................................................................7
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences......................................................................8
Transaction Expenses.........................................................................................9
Voting Procedures............................................................................................9
II. THE PARTNERSHIP..............................................................................................9
General......................................................................................................9
The Properties..............................................................................................10
Market for Partnership Interests and Related Security Holder Matters........................................11
Distribution History........................................................................................11
III. THE SALE...................................................................................................13
Background and Reasons for the Sale.........................................................................13
Acquisition Agreement.......................................................................................14
Transaction Costs.......................................................................................14
Distribution of Sale Proceeds; Accounting Treatment.........................................................15
Conditions..................................................................................................16
Potential Benefits of the Sale..............................................................................16
Potential Adverse Effects of the Sale.......................................................................18
Fairness Opinion............................................................................................20
Alternatives to the Sale....................................................................................23
Recommendation of the General Partners; Fairness............................................................25
IV. AMENDMENTS TO THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.....................................................................28
V. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST........................................................................................29
General.....................................................................................................29
Fiduciary Responsibility....................................................................................30
VI. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION..............................................................................31
VII. CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES....................................................................32
VIII. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ........................................................................................33
656661.11
-ii-
<PAGE>
IX. LIMITED PARTNERS CONSENT PROCEDURE..........................................................................34
Distribution of Solicitation Materials......................................................................34
Voting Procedures and Consents..............................................................................34
Completion Instructions.....................................................................................35
Withdrawal and Change of Election Rights....................................................................35
No Dissenters Rights of Appraisal...........................................................................36
Solicitation of Consents....................................................................................36
X. IMPORTANT NOTE...............................................................................................36
ANNEXES
Annex A - Fairness Opinion of Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
</TABLE>
656661.11
-iii-
<PAGE>
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Real Estate Associates Limited V is subject to the informational
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and in accordance therewith files reports, consent solicitation
statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Commission"). Such reports, consent solicitation statements and other
information filed with the Commission can be inspected and copied at the public
reference facilities maintained by the Commission at Room 1024, 450 Fifth
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the Commission's Regional Offices,
Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York 10048 and Citicorp
Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511.
Copies of such materials also can be obtained from the Public Reference Section
of the Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed
rates.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents filed with the Commission by the Partnership
are incorporated by reference in this Consent Solicitation Statement:
(a) Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996; and
(b) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter
ended September 30, 1997.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated by reference herein
shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Consent
Solicitation Statement to the extent that a statement contained herein modifies
or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall
not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this
Consent Solicitation Statement.
656661.11
-iv-
<PAGE>
I. SUMMARY OF CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT
The following summary is intended to provide only highlights of the
materials contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement. This summary is not
intended to be a complete statement of all material features of the proposed
Sale and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information contained
herein. Cross references in the summary are to the indicated captions or
portions of this Consent Solicitation Statement.
The Partnership
Real Estate Associates Limited V (the "Partnership") is a California
limited partnership, the general partners of which are National Partnership
Investments Corp., a California corporation ("NAPICO") and National Partnership
Investments Associates II, a California limited partnership ("NPIA") (referred
to collectively herein as the "General Partners").
The Partnership holds limited partnership interests in nineteen local
limited partnerships (the "Local Partnerships"), which in turn hold title to
nineteen Properties. Each of the Local Partnerships owns a low income housing
project that is subsidized and/or has a mortgage note payable to or insured by
agencies of the federal or local government. The Properties are located in nine
states. Nine of the Properties are located in California, three are in Texas and
there is one Property in each of seven other states. See "THE PARTNERSHIP -- The
Properties."
The Partnership maintains offices at 9090 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly
Hills, California 90211 (310-278-2191). The Partnership was organized as a
California limited partnership on May 7, 1982. See "THE PARTNERSHIP."
The Sale
The Partnership proposes to sell all of the Real Estate Interests to
the REIT for cash. It is the intention of the General Partners to liquidate the
General Partnership following consummation of the Sale. See "THE SALE."
The aggregate consideration for the Sale is $53,789,555, payable
$1,571,673 in cash and $52,217,882 by assumption by the REIT of certain mortgage
indebtedness. The REIT intends to raise the cash to be paid to the Partnership
through a private placement of approximately $285 million of its equity
securities (the "Private Placement"). The REIT intends to commence an initial
public offering of its equity securities subsequent to the consummation of the
Sale.
The net proceeds of the Sale will be distributed to the Limited and
General Partners in accordance with the cash distribution provisions of the
Partnership Agreement. See "THE SALE--Distribution of Sale Proceeds" for a
summary of the cash distribution rules applicable to such distributions. Limited
Partners are expected to receive approximately $787 in cash per unit, each unit
consisting of two limited partnership interests, which were originally sold for
$5,000 per unit (a "Unit") in connection with the distribution of the net
proceeds of the Sale and the liquidation of the Partnership. All expenses of the
Sale will be borne by the Partnership.
The distribution is anticipated to be sufficient to pay any federal and
state income taxes that would be due in connection with the Sale, assuming that
Limited Partners have suspended passive losses of $5,062 per Unit from the
Partnership that could be deducted in full against such Limited Partners'
ordinary income which is taped at a federal rate of 39.6% and an effective state
income tax rate of 5%. For such Limited Partners, the Sale should result in a
net cash distribution of $436 per Unit, after deduction of federal and state
income taxes of $351 per Unit, assuming federal tax rates of 39.6% on ordinary
income and 25% on long-term capital gain attributable to depreciation (and
assuming an effective
656661.11
-1-
<PAGE>
5% state tax). For Limited Partners who do not have sufficient taxable
income to be taxed at a 39.6% marginal federal rate or who have other losses
available to deduct against their taxable income and therefore could not fully
utilize such suspended passive losses to offset their ordinary income the sale
could result in a federal and state tax cost in excess of cash distributions.
For Limited Partners who have been able to use all of the passive losses
generated by the Partnership on a current basis, the Sale should result in a
federal income tax cost of approximately $1,822 per Unit in excess of the cash
distribution. Each Limited Partner is urged to consult his, her or its own tax
advisor for a more detailed explanation of the specific tax consequences to such
Limited Partner from the Sale. NAPICO and NPIA will be entitled to receive a
distribution in connection with the Sale of $31,027. See "CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSEQUENCES."
The Sale is conditioned upon, among other things, (i) approval of a
majority in interest of the Limited Partners of the Partnership; (ii) the
consummation of the Private Placement; (iii) the consent of the general partners
of the nineteen local limited partnerships in which the Partnership holds an
interest; (iv) the approval of the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development and certain state housing finance agencies; and (v) the consummation
of a minimum number of real estate purchases from the Casden Partnerships in
connection with the REIT Transaction. See "THE PARTNERSHIP -- Regulatory
Arrangements" and "THE SALE -- Conditions."
Potential Benefits of the Sale
The General Partners believe that the Sale achieves the Partnership's
investment objectives for the following reasons:
o Receipt of Cash. The Sale will result in a cash distribution of
$787 per Unit to Limited Partners, which amount is anticipated to
be sufficient to pay any federal and state income taxes that would
be payable in connection with the Sale, assuming (i) that Limited
Partners have suspended passive losses of $5,062 per Unit from the
Partnership; (ii) that such losses are available to offset
ordinary income taxed at the 39.6% marginal rate; and (iii)
federal and state effective capital gains rates of 25% and 5%,
respectively. The Partnership has never been able to make
distributions and, if the Sale is not completed, the General
Partners do not anticipate that the Partnership will be in a
position to make distributions in the near future.
o Opportune Time to Sell. The General Partners believe that now may
be an opportune time for the Partnership to sell its interests in
the Properties, given current conditions in the real estate and
capital markets. Specifically, the General Partners believe that
investor demand for the stock of certain public real estate
companies similar to the proposed REIT has increased significantly
over the past several years. The General Partners believe that the
current interest rate environment and the availability of capital
for real estate investment trusts will enable Casden to form the
REIT and make the proposal to the Partnership for the Sale, which
provides the Partnership with an opportunity to maximize the value
of the Properties.
o Third Party Fairness Opinion. Robert A. Stanger & Company., Inc.
("Stanger"), an independent, nationally recognized real estate
investment banking firm, has been engaged by the Partnership to
render an opinion (the "Fairness Opinion") to the Partnership as
to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Limited
Partners of the valuation ascribed to the Properties in connection
with determining the Purchase Price to be received by the
Partnership for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale. Stanger has
conducted certain reviews described herein and has concluded,
subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations
contained in its opinion, that the valuation ascribed to the
Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price to be
received for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale is fair, from a
financial point of view, to Limited Partners.
656661.11
-2-
<PAGE>
o Eliminating the Risks of Real Estate Investing. Continued
ownership of the Properties subjects the Partnership to continued
risks inherent in real estate ownership, such as national and
local economic trends, supply and demand factors in the local
property market, the cost of operating and maintaining the
physical condition of the Properties and the cost and availability
of financing for prospective buyers of the Properties. No
assurance can be given that a prospective buyer would be willing
to pay an amount equal to or greater than the Purchase Price for
the Properties in the future.
o Unattractiveness of Other Options. The General Partners do not
believe that other alternatives available to the Partnership are
as attractive to the Partnership as the Sale. One alternative
considered by the General Partners was continued ownership of the
Properties by the Partnership. However, the Partnership is not
currently making distributions to the Limited Partners and the tax
benefits resulting from continuing to own the Properties, which
are available only to those Limited Partners able to currently
utilize passive losses, are diminishing. The General Partners also
considered marketing the Properties to third parties; however, the
General Partners do not believe that such alternative would be in
the interests of the Limited Partners, because the General
Partners believe, based on the current uncertainties in the
government subsidized housing market, that it would be difficult
to sell the Properties and do not believe that such a sale would
result in a purchase price for the Properties as high as the
Purchase Price offered in connection with the Sale. In addition,
the General Partners believe that marketing the Properties to
third parties would result in significant delays and
uncertainties. Several of the options considered by the General
Partners, including the reorganization of the Partnership as a
real estate investment trust, a rollup involving the Partnership
and the use of an "UPREIT" structure, would have (i) been
prohibitively expensive and logistically impractical; (ii)
entailed compliance with the rollup rules promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), which
may have resulted in significant delays, thereby potentially
causing the Partnership to miss the currently favorable market
conditions for real estate investment trusts; and (iii) resulted
in the Limited Partners receiving publicly traded securities
rather than cash in exchange for their Units. Such publicly traded
securities would be subject to the market risks generally
applicable to equity securities. The General Partners believe that
receipt of such securities would be inconsistent with the
Partnership's ultimate objective of returning cash to the Limited
Partners and winding up the business of the Partnership.
o Resolving HUD Uncertainty. Eighteen of the nineteen Properties are
subject to Housing Assistance Payments Contracts under Section 8
of the United States Housing Act. The General Partners anticipate
that, for the foreseeable future, rental rate increases under such
contracts will either not be permitted by HUD or will be
negligible and unlikely to exceed increases in operating expenses.
Most of these contracts will expire by the end of 2003 and the
Department of Housing and Urban Development will not renew them
under their current terms. Under recently passed legislation, in
most cases project rents will be reduced and the project mortgages
restructured, which is expected to reduce the cash flow from the
Properties and could create adverse tax consequences to the
Limited Partners. HUD has not issued implementing regulations on
the Section 8 restructuring program, which creates additional
uncertainty. Accordingly, the General Partners believe it may be
beneficial to the Limited Partners to avoid such uncertainties by
approving the Sale at this time. See "THE PARTNERSHIP - Regulatory
Arrangements".
o Reduced Transaction Costs. The Partnership will not be required to
pay brokerage commissions in connection with the Sale. Brokerage
commissions would typically be paid when selling real property to
third parties and the Partnership would typically be required to
pay transaction costs, which are being borne by the REIT in
connection with the Sale. As a result, the Sale is likely to
produce a higher cash
656661.11
-3-
<PAGE>
distribution to Limited Partners than a comparable sale to an
unaffiliated third party. In addition, the General Partners
believe that selling the Partnership's entire portfolio of real
estate assets in a single transaction (as opposed to a series of
individual sales) will enable the Partnership to dispose of its
portfolio in an expedited time frame.
o Anticipated Tax Benefits/Tax Law Changes. Subsequent to the
formation of the Partnership, tax law changes reduced the tax
benefits anticipated to be received by Limited Partners by not
allowing Limited Partners to currently deduct many of the losses
generated by the Partnership against a Limited Partner's other
taxable income from non-passive sources. As a result, Limited
Partners may have a significant amount of suspended passive losses
available to reduce the tax impact of the taxable gain generated
by the Sale.
Potential Adverse Effects of the Sale
Limited Partners should also consider the following risk factors in
determining whether to approve or disapprove the Sale:
o Loss of Opportunity to Benefit from Future Events. It is possible
that the future performance of the Properties will improve or that
prospective buyers may be willing to pay more for the Properties
in the future. It is possible that Limited Partners might earn a
higher return on their investment if the Partnership retained
ownership of the Properties. By approving the Sale, Limited
Partners will also be relinquishing certain current benefits of
ownership of the Properties, such as the ability to deduct tax
losses generated by the Partnership against other passive income.
In addition, the proposed restructuring of FHA-insured mortgages
under recently enacted legislation may result in benefits to
Limited Partners due to possible debt forgiveness or other changes
that might increase cash flow. By approving the Sale, the Limited
Partners would forgo any such potential tax benefits, although the
General Partners do not believe such benefits are likely to
materialize. See "THE PARTNERSHIP - Regulatory Arrangements."
o No Solicitation of Third Party Offers. The General Partners have
not solicited any offers from third parties to acquire the Real
Estate interests. While the General Partners believe that the Sale
is on terms more beneficial to the Partnership than offers that
could be obtained from third parties, there is no assurance that
the General Partners would not be able to obtain higher or better
offers if such offers were to be solicited from independent third
parties.
o Sale Not Negotiated at Arms-Length. Affiliates of the General
Partners will possess a significant ownership interest in the REIT
and receive substantial other benefits from the formation of the
REIT and the Sale. Although a fairness opinion has been obtained,
the Purchase Price was not negotiated at arm's length. The
Purchase Price was established by the General Partners and the
Partnership did not retain an independent financial or legal
advisor to negotiate the terms of the Sale.
o Conflicts of Interest. In evaluating the proposed Sale, Limited
Partners should consider that Casden is both the sponsor of the
REIT and an affiliate of the General Partners. If the REIT is
successfully formed and capitalized, the current owners of Casden
are likely to realize a substantial increase in the value and
liquidity of their investment in Casden Properties. The terms of
the Sale have been determined on behalf of the Partnership by
officers and directors of Casden who will directly benefit from
the Sale. Unlike Casden, the Limited Partners will not have the
right to participate in the REIT. It is anticipated that
approximately 51% of the equity securities of the REIT will be
held by Casden and
656661.11
-4-
<PAGE>
its affiliates following the Private Placement, based on the terms
of the Private Placement as currently contemplated.
o Tax Consequences. The Sale will have a tax impact on Limited
Partners, producing a long-term capital gain of approximately
$8,697 per Unit. It is not anticipated that the Sale will produce
ordinary income attributable to depreciation recapture. For
certain tax-exempt Limited Partners, a portion of the taxable gain
noted above will constitute unrelated business taxable income
("UBTI"). For Limited Partners who have been able to use all of
the passive losses generated by the Partnership on a current
basis, the Sale should result in a federal income tax cost of
approximately $1,822 per Unit in excess of cash distributions. In
addition, Limited Partners who have available all of the suspended
passive losses generated by the Partnership, but whose ordinary
income is not taxed at the 39.6% marginal rate will incur a
federal income tax cost in excess of the cash distribution made in
connection with the Sale. See "CERTAIN FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES."
THE SPECIFIC TAX IMPACT OF THE SALE ON LIMITED PARTNERS SHOULD BE
DETERMINED BY LIMITED PARTNERS IN CONSULTATION WITH THEIR TAX
ADVISORS.
o No Appraisals; Limits on Fairness Opinion. Although the General
Partners have obtained the Fairness Opinion, the General Partners
have not obtained independent appraisals of the Properties to
determine their value. In addition, while the Fairness Opinion
addresses the fairness of the valuations ascribed to the
Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price, it
does not address adjustments to the valuation to arrive at the
distributions to the Limited Partners that will result from the
Sale, including the allocation of such Purchase Price between the
Limited Partners and the general partners of the Local
Partnerships, which affects the amount of the consideration to be
paid to the Limited Partners. See "THE SALE - Fairness Opinion."
o No Dissenter's Rights. Under the Partnership Agreement and
California law, Limited Partners do not have dissenters' rights of
appraisal.
o Conditions to Sale. The Sale is subject to certain conditions in
addition to approval of the Sale by the Limited Partners,
including consummation of the Private Placement. Accordingly, even
if the Sale is approved by the Limited Partners and a purchase and
sale agreement is entered into, the consummation of the Sale could
be delayed for a significant period of time and it is possible
that the Sale may not be consummated. The execution of a purchase
and sale agreement with respect to the Sale could delay the time
some or all of the Properties could be sold if the Sale is not
consummated.
o Uncertainty of Local General Partner Buyouts. The General Partners
are currently in the process of structuring a buyout of the
interests in the Local Partnerships held by certain of the general
partners of the Local Partnerships that are unaffiliated with
Casden. Such buyouts are being negotiated on an arms-length basis.
There can be no assurance that the General Partners will be able
to successfully complete buyouts from all of the unaffiliated
general partners on acceptable terms. If the General Partners are
unable to complete all such buyouts, and interests in certain
Properties are not transferred in the Sale, there could be an
adverse impact on the operating results of the Partnership,
depending on which Properties (if any) are retained by the
Partnership. In addition, the winding up of the Partnership's
business could be delayed, perhaps indefinitely. The make-up of
the Partnership after the Sale if less than all of the general
partners of the Local Partnerships approve the Sale cannot be
determined at this time. To the extent that the ultimate cost of
such buyouts exceeds the General Partners' current estimates of
such cost, the distributions to Limited Partners resulting from
the Sale will be reduced. At the time they consent to the Sale,
the Limited Partners will not know which of the
656661.11
-5-
<PAGE>
Properties will ultimately be transferred in connection with the
Sale; nevertheless, consent to the Sale will be deemed effective
regardless of which Properties are ultimately included in the
Sale.
o Amendments to Partnership Agreement. Approval of the Sale shall be
deemed to include certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement.
For example, the Partnership Agreement prohibits the Partnership
from selling any Property or any interest in a Property if the cash
proceeds from such sale would be less than the state and federal
taxes applicable to such sale, calculated using the maximum tax
rates then in effect. The General Partners are seeking an amendment
that modifies such prohibition to allow the Partnership to assume,
for purposes of calculating taxes in connection with a sale of
Properties, that all of the suspended passive losses from the
Partnership are available to Limited Partners to offset ordinary
income taxed at the 39.6% federal marginal rate. By approving such
amendment, the Limited Partners are relinquishing a potential tax
benefit conferred by the terms of the Partnership Agreement.
However, the General Partners believe that it would not be possible
to find a buyer willing to purchase the Properties under the
conditions currently specified in the Partnership Agreement,
because compliance with such conditions would result in a purchase
price for the Properties substantially higher than their fair
market value.
Amendments to Partnership Agreement
Certain Amendments to the Partnership Agreement are necessary in
connection with the consummation of the Sale. The Partnership Agreement
currently prohibits a sale of any of the Properties to the General Partners or
their affiliates. Accordingly, consent of the Limited Partners is being sought
for an amendment to the Partnership Agreement that eliminates such prohibition.
The Partnership Agreement also requires that any agreement entered into
between the Partnership and the General Partners or any affiliate of the General
Partners shall provide that it may be canceled at any time by the Partnership
without penalty upon 60 days' prior written notice (the "Termination
Provision"). It is the position of the General Partners that the Termination
Provision does not apply to the Sale; nevertheless, the General Partners are
seeking the approval of the Limited Partners to an amendment to the Partnership
Agreement that eliminates the Termination Provision in connection with the Sale
or any future disposition of Properties.
The Partnership Agreement also prohibits the Partnership from selling
any Property or any interest in a Property if the cash proceeds from such sale
would be less than the state and federal taxes applicable to such sale,
calculated using the maximum tax rates then in effect (the "Tax Requirement").
The General Partners are seeking the approval of the Limited Partners to an
amendment to the Partnership Agreement that modifies the Tax Requirement so as
to allow the Partnership to calculate the net tax liability from a sale of a
Property or Properties by subtracting from the tax payable on the gain from such
sale the tax benefit resulting from the ability to deduct his, her or its,
suspended passive losses against ordinary income, assuming that the Limited
Partner has sufficient ordinary income that would otherwise have been taxed at
the 39.6% marginal federal tax rate for federal income tax purposes to fully
utilize such losses at such rate, and assuming a state income tax rate of 5%.
By approving such amendment, the Limited Partners are relinquishing a
potential benefit conferred by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. However,
the General Partners believe that it would not be possible to find a buyer
willing to purchase the Properties under the conditions currently specified in
the Partnership Agreement, because compliance with such conditions would result
in a purchase price for the Properties substantially higher than their fair
market value.
656661.11
-6-
<PAGE>
The consent of Limited Partners holding a majority of outstanding Units
is required in order to amend the Partnership Agreement.
Limited Partner Approval
The General Partners are seeking the consent of the Limited Partners to
the Sale, which includes the Amendments. The Partnership Agreement requires the
prior consent of Limited Partners holding a majority of the outstanding Units (a
"Majority Vote") to any sale of all or substantially all of the Partnership's
assets, and to an amendment to the Partnership Agreement.
If the Limited Partners do not approve the Sale by a Majority Vote, or
the other conditions to the consummation of the Sale are not met, there will be
no change in its investment objectives, policies and restrictions and the
Partnership will continue to be operated in accordance with the terms of the
Partnership Agreement.
Third-Party Opinion
The Partnership has obtained from Stanger, a recognized independent
real estate investment banking firm, an opinion that the valuation ascribed to
the Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price to be received
by the Partnership for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale is fair to the
Limited Partners from a financial point of view. In the course of preparing its
Fairness Opinion, Stanger conducted such reviews as it deemed appropriate and
discussed its methodology, analysis and conclusions with the General Partners.
The General Partners have not obtained independent appraisals to determine the
value of the Properties. The Fairness Opinion, which is subject to certain
assumptions, qualifications and limitations, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
See "THE SALE-Fairness Opinion" and "--Potential Adverse Effects of the Sale--No
Appraisals; Limits on Fairness Opinion."
Recommendation of the General Partners
After a comprehensive review of various alternatives, the General
Partners believe that the Sale is in the best interests of the Limited Partners.
The General Partners believe that the current interest rate environment and the
availability of capital for real estate investment trusts will enable Casden to
form the REIT and make the proposal to the Partnership for the Sale, which
provides the Partnership with an opportunity to maximize the value of the Real
Estate Interest. See "THE SALE--Alternatives to the Sale."
Based upon their analysis of the alternatives and their own business
judgment, the General Partners believe that the Sale, including the Purchase
Price of the Real Estate Interests, is fair from a financial point of view to
the Limited Partners. In addition, the General Partners reviewed the Fairness
Opinion. Accordingly, the General Partners have approved the Sale and recommend
that it be approved by the Limited Partners. Limited Partners should note,
however, that the General Partners' recommendation is subject to inherent
conflicts of interest. See "CONFLICTS OF INTEREST."
Conflicts of Interest
A number of conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships
among the General Partners, the Casden Partnerships, Casden and the REIT, which
may, among other things, influence the recommendation of the General Partners.
These conflicts include the following:
1. The terms of the Sale (including the Purchase Price) were
established by the REIT and the General Partners (which are related parties)
without the participation of any independent financial or legal advisor. There
656661.11
-7-
<PAGE>
can be no assurance that arms-length negotiations would not have resulted in
terms more favorable to the Limited Partners.
2. Although Stanger provided an independent opinion with respect to the
fairness of the valuations ascribed to the Properties in connection with the
determination of the Purchase Price, no independent financial or legal advisor
was engaged to represent the interests of the Limited Partners and no third
party appraisals of the Properties were obtained.
3. If the REIT Transaction is consummated, affiliates of the General
Partners will receive substantial interests in the REIT in exchange for the
contribution of real property assets and the property management operations of
Casden, including direct or indirect interests in the General Partners. The
General Partners anticipate that they will receive significant economic benefits
as a result of receiving interests in the REIT. Such interests are expected to
enjoy greater liquidity than the General Partners' current interests in the
Partnership if the REIT successfully completes an initial public offering
following its initial formation as a private REIT. Unlike Casden, the Limited
Partners will not have the right to participate in the REIT. It is anticipated
that approximately 51% of the equity securities of the REIT will be held by
Casden and its affiliates following the Private Placement, based on the terms of
the Private Placement as currently contemplated.
4. It is anticipated that the return from the interests in the REIT to
be received by the General Partners and their affiliates in connection with the
REIT Transaction if successfully consummated will exceed the return such persons
currently receive from the real estate assets such persons will contribute or
sell to the REIT.
5. The officers and employees of Casden and its affiliates will be
employed by the REIT. See "CONFLICTS OF INTEREST."
6. The General Partners are currently in the process of structuring a
buyout of the interests in the Local Partnerships held by the general partners
of the Local Partnerships. The General Partners will benefit from such buyouts
because the interests of the general partners of the Local Partnerships will be
acquired by the REIT. However, the costs of such buyouts will be indirectly
borne by the Limited Partners. To the extent that the ultimate cost of such
buyouts exceeds the General Partners' current estimates of such cost, the
distributions to Limited Partners resulting from the Sale will be reduced.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences
Generally, the Sale will result in a gain to the Partnership and,
accordingly, to the Limited Partners, to the extent that the consideration
received by the Partnership with respect to the Sale, including the amount of
Partnership indebtedness of which the Partnership is relieved, exceeds its
adjusted basis in the Properties. The income tax calculations contained in this
Consent Solicitation Statement are based upon federal tax rates equal to 39.6%
for ordinary income 25% for capital gain attributable to depreciation recapture
and 20% on other capital gains. In addition, such calculations assume that
Limited Partners have suspended passive losses of $5,062 per Unit from the
Partnership and that such losses are available to offset ordinary income taxed
at the 39.6% marginal rate. Limited Partners should consult their own tax
advisors with respect to their individual tax situations and as to the federal,
state, local and other tax consequences of the Sale. See "CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSEQUENCES."
656661.11
-8-
<PAGE>
Transaction Expenses
The Partnership will bear its direct costs relating to the Sale,
including customary closing costs such as transfer taxes, the seller's portion
of title insurance and escrow fees, and the costs incurred in connection with
this solicitation of consents. The aggregate amount of such costs is expected to
be $500,000, which the Partnership expects to pay using cash equivalents held by
the Partnership. The cost of this solicitation of consents will be borne by the
Partnership whether or not the Sale is approved by the Limited Partners or
ultimately consummated. Costs incurred individually by the Casden Partnerships,
including accounting and legal fees will be borne directly by such Partnerships.
Voting Procedures
This Consent Solicitation Statement outlines the procedures to be
followed by Limited Partners in order to consent to the Sale. A form of Consent
of Limited Partner (a "Consent") is attached hereto. These procedures must be
strictly followed in order for the instructions of a Limited Partner as marked
on such Limited Partner's Consent to be effective. The following is a summary of
certain of these procedures:
1. A Limited Partner may make his or her election on the Consent only
during the solicitation period commencing upon the date of delivery of this
Consent Solicitation Statement and continuing until the earlier of (i)
___________, 1998 or such later date as may be determined by the General
Partners and (ii) the date upon which the General Partners determine that a
Majority Vote has been obtained (but no earlier than ________, 1998) (the
"Solicitation Period").
2. Limited Partners are encouraged to return a properly completed and
executed Consent to the Partnership prior to the expiration of the Solicitation
Period.
3. A Consent delivered by a Limited Partner may be changed prior to the
expiration of the Solicitation Period by delivering to the Partnership a
substitute Consent, properly completed and executed, together with a letter
indicating that the Limited Partner's prior Consent has been revoked.
4. A Limited Partner submitting a signed but unmarked Consent will be
deemed to have voted FOR the Partnership's participation in the Sale, including
the Amendments.
II. THE PARTNERSHIP
General
The Partnership is a limited partnership formed under the laws of the
State of California on May 7, 1982. On July 7, 1982, the Partnership offered
1,950 units consisting of 3,900 limited partnership interests and warrants to
purchase 3,900 additional limited partnership interests at $5,000 per unit
through an offering managed by E.F. Hutton & Company Inc., a predecessor of
Lehman Brothers Inc. There are currently 7,808 limited partnership interests of
the Partnership outstanding.
The General Partners of the Partnership are NAPICO and NPIA. The
business of the Partnership is conducted primarily by the General Partners. The
Partnership has no employees of its own.
Casden Investment Corporation owns 100 percent of NAPICO's stock. The
current members of NAPICO's Board of Directors are Charles H. Boxenbaum, Bruce
E. Nelson, Alan I. Casden and Henry C. Casden. Charles
656661.11
-9-
<PAGE>
H Boxenbaum and an unrelated individual are the limited partners of NPIA. NAPICO
is the general partner of NPIA.
The original objectives of the Partnership were to own and operate the
Properties (and certain other real estate assets) for investment so as to obtain
(i) tax benefits for the Partners; (ii) reasonable protection for the
Partnership's capital investments; (iii) potential for appreciation, subject to
considerations of capital preservation; and (iv) potential for future cash
distributions from operations (on a limited basis), refinancing or sale of a
Property.
The Partnership holds limited partnership interests in nineteen Local
Partnerships, eighteen of which own a low income housing project that is
subsidized and/or has a mortgage note payable to or insured by agencies of the
federal or local government.
The Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested were, at
least initially, organized by private developers who acquired the sites, or
options thereon, and applied for applicable mortgage insurance and subsidies.
The Partnership became the principal limited partner in these Local Partnerships
pursuant to arm's-length negotiations with these developers, or others, who act
as general partners. As a limited partner, the Partnership's liability for
obligations of the Local Partnership is limited to its investment. The local
general partner of each Local Partnership retains responsibility for developing,
constructing, maintaining, operating and managing the project. Under certain
circumstances, the Partnership has the right to replace the general partner of
the Local Partnership.
The Properties
During 1996, all of the Properties in which REAL V had invested were
substantially rented. The following is a schedule of the status, as of December
31, 1996, of the Properties owned by the Local Partnerships in which REAL V is a
limited partner.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
No. of Units Authorized for Rental Units Percentage of
Units Assistance under Section 8 - Occupied Total Units
Name & Location ---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Bickerdike 140 140 134 96%
Chicago, IL
Canoga Park Apartments 14 14 14 100%
Canoga Park, CA
Castle Park Apartments 209 209 199 95%
Normandy, MO
Centennial Townhomes 88 88 86 98%
Fort Wayne, IN
Creekside Gardens 50 50 47 94%
Loveland, COMPANY
Del Haven Manor 104 104 104 100%
Jackson, MS
Fox Run Apartments 70 70 66 94%
Orange, TX
Grandview Place Apartments 48 48 48 100%
Missoula, MT
Hamlin Estates 30 30 30 100%
Los Angeles, CA
Heritage Square 50 50 49 98%
Texas City, TX
North River Club Apartments 56 56 55 98%
Oceanside, CA
Palm Springs Senior 116 116 110 95%
Citizens Housing
Palm Springs, CA
656661.11
-10-
<PAGE>
Panorama City 14 14 14 100%
Los Angeles, CA
Panorama City II 13 13 13 100%
Los Angeles, CA
Pine Lake Terrace Apartments 111 None 99 89%
Garden Grove, CA
Plummer Village 75 74 74 99%
Los Angeles, CA
Ranger Apartments 50 50 48 96%
Ranger, TX
Richland Three Rivers 40 40 39 98%
Retirement Apartments
Richland, WA
Robert Farrell Manor 35 35 35 100%
Los Angeles, CA
TOTALS 1,313 1,201 1,264 98%
----- ----- ----- ---
</TABLE>
Each of the Properties is approximately 15 years old. Routine repair
and maintenance and capital expenditures made at the Properties amounted to
approximately $1,900,000 in the aggregate for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Due to the age of the Properties, capital expenditures are expected to increase
progressively over the remaining useful lives of the Properties.
Market for Partnership Interests and Related Security Holder Matters
Limited partnership interests in the Partnership were sold through a
public offering managed by E.F. Hutton & Company Inc., a predecessor of Lehman
Brothers Inc., and are not traded on a public exchange. There is no public
market for Units and it is not anticipated that any market will develop for the
purchase and sale of Units. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Units may be
transferred only if certain requirements are satisfied. On December 31, 1996,
there were 1,497 registered holders of Units in the Partnership. None of the
Units is beneficially owned by Casden.
The high and low value of secondary market trades during the
twelve-month period ending December 31, 1997 as compiled by NAPICO were $250.00
and $132.50, respectively. No established market for the Units was ever expected
to develop and the secondary market transactions for the Units have been limited
and sporadic. It is not known to what extent the transactions in the secondary
market are between buyers and willing sellers, each having access to relevant
information regarding the financial affairs of the Partnerships, expected value
of their assets, and their prospects for the future. Many transactions in the
secondary market are believed to be distressed sales where sellers are highly
motivated to dispose of the Units and willing to accept substantial discounts
from what might otherwise be regarded as the fair value of the interest being
sold, to facilitate the sales. Secondary market prices generally do not reflect
the current market of the Partnerships' assets, nor are they indicative of total
return, since prior cash distributions and tax benefits received by the original
investor are not reflected in the price. Nonetheless, notwithstanding these
qualifications, the second market prices, to the extent that the reported data
are reliable, are indicative of the prices at which the Units trade in the
illiquid secondary markets.
Distribution History
The Partnership has not made any distributions to Limited Partners since
its inception.
656661.11
-11-
<PAGE>
Regulatory Arrangements
Although each of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has
invested generally owns a Property that must compete in the market place for
tenants, interest subsidies and rent supplements from governmental agencies make
it possible to offer these dwelling units to eligible "low income" tenants at a
cost significantly below the market rate for comparable conventionally financed
dwelling units in the area.
In order to stimulate private investment in low income housing, the
federal government and certain state and local agencies have provided
significant ownership incentives, including among others, interest subsidies,
rent supplements and mortgage insurance, with the intent of reducing certain
market risks and providing investors with certain tax benefits, plus limited
cash distributions and the possibility of long-term capital gains. There remain,
however, significant risks. The long-term nature of investments in government
assisted housing limits the ability of the Partnership to vary its portfolio in
response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions; such
investments are also subject to changes in local economic circumstances and
housing patterns, as well as rising operating costs, vacancies, rent collection
difficulties, energy shortages and other factors that have an impact on real
estate values. The Partnership's government assisted projects also require
greater management expertise and may have higher operating expenses than
conventional housing projects.
Section 8 of the United States Housing Act provides for the payment of
a federal rental subsidy for the benefit of low income families (the "Section 8
Program"). Pursuant to the Section 8 Program, the Partnership entered into
Housing Assistance Payments Contracts (the "HAP Contracts") with the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") or a state of local
administering agency as agent of HUD with respect to all of the Properties
except the Pine Lakes Terrace Apartments. Under the HAP Contracts, which
generally have from four to five years remaining, 1,201 apartment units at
eighteen of the Properties (which the Partnership has agreed to lease to low or
moderate income tenants) receive rental assistance payments from HUD. During
1996, the Local Partnerships received an aggregate of approximately $9,637,000
in rental assistance payments under the HAP Contracts. The eighteen Properties
subject to the HAP Contracts generally are subject to mortgage loans insured by
HUD's Federal Housing Administration ("FHA") and the HAP Contracts generally
provide for sufficient payments to make the payments due under the federally
insured mortgage loans.
Under recently adopted law and policy, HUD has determined not to renew
HAP contracts on a long term basis on the existing terms. In connection with
renewals of the HAP Contracts under such new law and policy, the amount of
rental assistance payments under renewed HAP Contracts will be based on market
rentals instead of above-market rentals, which was generally the case under
existing HAP Contracts. As a result, existing HAP Contracts that are renewed in
the future on projects insured by the Federal Housing Administration of HUD will
not provide sufficient cash flow to permit owners of properties to meet the debt
service requirements of these existing HUD-FHA insured ("FHA") mortgages. In
order to address the reduction in payments under HAP Contracts as a result of
this new policy, the Multi-family Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act
of 1997 (the "MAHRAA"), which was adopted in October 1997, provides for the
restructuring of mortgage loans insured by the FHA with respect to properties
subject to HAP Contracts that have been renewed under the new policy. The
restructured Loans will be held by the current lender or another lender. Under
MAHRAA, an FHA-insured mortgage loan can be restructured to reduce the mortgage
balance and the annual debt service on such loan. As of the date of this Consent
Solicitation Statement, implementation of the MAHRAA had not yet begun.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will be permitted to
restructure its mortgage indebtedness pursuant to the new HUD rules implementing
MAHRAA or that the Partnership would choose to restructure such mortgage
indebtedness if it were eligible to participate in the MAHRAA program. It should
be noted that there are uncertainties as to the economic impact on the
Partnership of the combination of the reduced payments under the HAP Contracts
and the restructuring of the
656661.11
-12-
<PAGE>
existing FHA-insured mortgage loans under MAHRAA. Accordingly, the General
Partners are unable to predict their impact on the Partnership's future cash
flow.
Pursuant to the HAP Contracts, the Partnership cannot sell its
interests in a Property without the consent of HUD and if applicable the
appropriate state or local agency. The General Partners are currently in the
process of seeking such consent. There is no assurance that HUD will provide
such approval.
Pursuant to certain state housing finance statutes and regulations,
certain of the Local Partnerships are subject to limitations on the
distributions of dividends to the Partnership. Such statutes and regulations
require such Local Partnerships to hold cash flows in excess of such dividend
limitations in restricted reserve accounts that may be used only for limited
purposes (the "Reserve Accounts"). The Purchase Price was calculated without
attributing value to the Reserve Accounts. The General Partners believe that
state regulatory considerations limiting availability of the Reserve Accounts to
the Partnership have the effect of substantially reducing or eliminating
entirely any value attributable to such Reserve Accounts. However, it is
possible that the REIT may in the future realize a benefit from the release of
funds held in the Reserve Accounts.
III. THE SALE
Background and Reasons for the Sale
The General Partners believe that it is in the interests of the
Partnership to sell the Properties. The Partnership is not currently realizing
any cash flow which is available for distribution to the Limited Partners and
does not anticipate realizing sufficient cash flow in the future to enable it to
make distributions to Limited Partners. Limited Partners will realize an
aggregate of approximately $830,000 in current passive activity rental losses
for 1997. In addition, the Limited partner will realize approximately $293,000
in interest income for 1997. Assuming Limited Partnerships are restricted from
utilizing passive Losses, the Limited Partnership will be liable for the taxes
related to the interest income without any corresponding cash distribution. In
light of the limited cash flow currently generated by the Properties and the
potentially adverse consequences of the recent changes in the laws and policies
applicable to HAP Contracts, the General Partners do not believe that a market
for the Properties currently exists.
Prior to the consummation of the Sale, the REIT intends to sell $285
million of its equity securities in the Private Placement. The proceeds of the
Private Placement will be used to finance the Sale and other property
acquisitions to be made in connection with the REIT Transaction. The REIT
intends to commence an initial public offering of its equity securities
subsequent to the consummation of the Sale. Casden and its affiliates are
expected to own approximately 51% of the equity securities of the REIT upon
completion of the Private Placement. Subsequent to its initial public offering,
the REIT intends to purchase and restructure all insured mortgage indebtedness
currently encumbering the Properties, which the General Partners believe will
enhance the returns pertaining to the Properties.
In recent years, real estate investment activity by publicly owned
corporations and trusts, such as real estate investment trusts ("REIT
Entities"), has increased dramatically. REIT Entities have become a major source
of capital for the real estate market as well as one of its most prominent
purchasers of real property. A publicly-traded REIT Entity is organized as a
real estate company to own and operate a portfolio of properties, has access to
new capital and its shares can be sold or transferred in the public securities
markets. Over the last year, the General Partners and Casden have had
discussions with several investment banking firms with regard to the formation
of a REIT Entity that would purchase the apartment properties owned by the
Casden Partnerships, together with certain other selected properties. Following
the aforementioned discussions, Casden decided to form the REIT.
656661.11
-13-
<PAGE>
The General Partners believe that the REIT, through its potential
access to the capital markets and its familiarity with the Properties, is in a
position to purchase the Properties on terms that are favorable to the
Partnership. The General Partners believe that the current market for securities
issued by REIT Entities will provide the Partnership with an opportunity to sell
the Properties to the REIT for a favorable price. Limited Partners should note,
however, that the General Partners' recommendation is subject to inherent
conflicts of interest. See "CONFLICTS OF INTEREST."
Acquisition Agreement
If the Sale is approved by the Limited Partners, it is contemplated
that the Partnership or the Local Partnerships, as the case may be, will enter
into a purchase and sale agreement with a subsidiary partnership of the REIT
(the "Operating Partnership"). The purchase and sale agreement will set forth
the terms and conditions under which the Partnership and the REIT and the
Operating Partnership are obligated to proceed with the Sale and will set forth
certain other agreements of such parties with respect to the Sale.
Representations and Warranties. The Partnership will not make any
representations and warranties to the REIT and the Operating Partnership in the
purchase and sale agreement with respect to the Properties, and the Properties
will be sold "as is."
Conditions. As described in detail below under the heading " -
Conditions" below, the purchase and sale agreement will include a number of
conditions to the REIT's obligation to consummate the Sale.
Amendment and Closing. The Partnership and the REIT or the Operating
Partnership may amend the terms of the purchase and sale agreement in a manner
which, in the good faith judgment of the General Partners (consistent with the
General Partners' fiduciary duty to the Partnership and the Limited Partners),
does not materially reduce the benefits to be received by the Limited Partners
from the Sale without resoliciting the consent of the Limited Partners. If the
Sale is approved by a Majority Vote of the Limited Partners and the other
conditions to the Sale and the REIT Transaction are satisfied, it is anticipated
that the Sale will be consummated by _____________, 1998. If the closing does
not occur by December 31, 1998 the purchase and sale agreement will be
terminated.
Arrangements with General Partners of the Local Limited Partnerships
The General Partners are currently in the process of structuring and
negotiating buyouts of the interests in the Local Partnerships held by certain
of the general partners of the Local Partnerships that are unaffiliated with
Casden. Such buyouts are being negotiated on an arms-length basis. The General
Partners expect that the general partners of the Local Partnerships will be paid
an aggregate of approximately $6,450,000 for their interests in, and rights to
manage, the Local Partnerships. There can be no assurance that the General
Partners will be able to successfully complete buyouts from all of the
unaffiliated general partners of the Local Partnerships on acceptable terms. To
the extent that the General Partners are unable to complete all such buyouts,
there could be an adverse impact on the operating results of the Partnership,
depending on which Properties are retained by the Partnership. In addition, the
winding up of the Partnership's business could be delayed, perhaps indefinitely.
The make-up of the Partnership after the Sale if less than all of the general
partners of the Local Partnerships approve the Sale cannot be determined at this
time. To the extent that the ultimate cost of such buyouts exceeds the General
Partners' current estimates of such cost, the distributions to Limited Partners
resulting from the Sale will be reduced.
656661.11
-14-
<PAGE>
Source of Funds
The REIT intends to raise the cash to be paid to the Partnership
through a private placement of approximately $285 million of its equity
securities.
Transaction Costs
The Casden General Partners estimate that the transaction costs in
connection with the Sale will be as follows:
Transfer Taxes........................................ $ *
Legal and Accounting ................................. *
Escrow Costs (seller's portion)....................... *
Title Policy (seller's portion)....................... *
Physical Inspection................................... *
Repayment of Letter of Credit Extension Fee.......... *
Stanger Fairness Opinion.............................. *
Consent Solicitation Costs............................ *
Miscellaneous Costs................................... *
Total................................................. $469,000
* To be provided by amendment.
The General Partners are not entitled to receive fees in connection
with the Sale.
Distribution of Sale Proceeds; Accounting Treatment
Following the Sale, and assuming that all of the Real Estate Interests
are sold, it is anticipated that the Partnership's affairs will be wound up and
the Partnership will be liquidated. After the payment of all liabilities and
expenses, the consideration to be paid to the Partnership for the Properties
will be allocated and distributed among Limited and General Partners in
accordance with the cash distribution rules set forth in the Partnership
Agreement. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, net liquidation proceeds are
distributable as follows:
o First, the General Partners will be entitled to a liquidation fee equal
to the lesser of (a) 10% of the net proceeds to the Partnership from the
Sale, or (b) 1% of the Purchase Price (including the assumed mortgage
indebtedness), plus 3% of the net proceeds after deducting an amount
sufficient to pay all federal and state taxes applicable to the Sale. No
part of a liquidation fee will be paid, however, unless the Limited
Partners shall have first received an amount equal to (i) the greater of
(A) their aggregate capital contributions, or (B) an amount sufficient to
satisfy the cumulative federal and state income tax liability, if any,
arising from the disposition of the Properties and all other assets
disposed of to date; less (ii) all amounts previously distributed to
Limited Partners. The General Partners will not be entitled to receive a
liquidation fee in connection with the Sale.
656661.11
-15-
<PAGE>
o Next, after allocating income from the Sale in an amount equal to the sum
of the negative adjusted capital account balances of all Partners with such
balances (computed after any distributions made under the paragraph above),
and after allocating 1% of the income in excess thereof, 1% to the General
Partners and 99% to the Limited Partners as a class, distributions shall be
made in accordance with such Partners' positive capital account balances.
Based on the distribution priority in the Partnership Agreement, and
assuming (i) the net proceeds of the Sale are $1,571,673, and (ii) cash
available for distribution (after payment of expenses) of $1,531,027, the
Limited Partners will be entitled to receive $3,071,673 ($787 per Unit). NAPICO
and NPIA will be entitled to receive a distribution in connection with the Sale
of $31,027.
Conditions
In addition to the consent by Majority Vote of the Limited Partners,
the Purchase and Sale Agreement is expected to contain, among others, the
following conditions (which may be waived by the REIT) as conditions precedent
to the REIT's obligation to consummate the Sale:
o Subject to certain exceptions, no material adverse change shall
have occurred with respect to a Property that has a material
adverse effect on the value of the Properties as a whole;
o The Partnership shall have delivered to the REIT any required
third party consents to the Sale, including the consent of HUD,
certain state housing finance agencies, the general partners of
the nineteen local general partnerships and the holders of certain
mortgages;
o The REIT shall have consummated the Private Placement, which will
be conditioned upon, among other things, the transfer of a minimum
number of properties to the REIT by the Casden Partnerships and
third parties in connection with the REIT Transaction; and
o The Sale of the Real Estate Interests is subject to the approval
of the General Partner of each Local Partnership. The General
Partners are currently in the process of structuring a buyout of
the interests in the Local Partnerships held by certain of the
general partners of the Local Partnerships that are unaffiliated
with Casden.
Potential Benefits of the Sale
The General Partners believe that the Sale achieves the Partnership's
investment objectives for the following reasons:
Receipt of Cash. No established market currently exists for Units and
none has existed since the original offering. The Sale will result in a cash
distribution of $787 per Unit to Limited Partners, which amount is anticipated
to be sufficient to pay any federal and state income taxes that would be payable
in connection with the Sale, assuming (i) that Limited Partners have suspended
passive losses of $5,062 from the Partnership; (ii) that such losses are
available to offset ordinary income taxed at the 39.6% federal marginal rate;
and (iii) federal and state capital gains rates of 25% and 5%, respectively. The
Partnership has never been able to make distributions and, if the Sale is not
completed, the General Partners do not anticipate that the Partnership will be
in a position to make distributions in the near future.
Opportune Time to Sell. The General Partners believe that now may be an
opportune time for the Partnership to sell its interests in the Properties,
given current conditions in the real estate and capital markets.
656661.11
-16-
<PAGE>
Specifically, the General Partners believe that investor demand for the stock of
certain public real estate companies similar to the proposed REIT has increased
significantly over the past several years. The General Partners believe that the
current interest rate environment and the availability of capital for real
estate investment trusts will enable Casden to form the REIT and make the
proposal to the Partnership for the Sale, which provides the Partnership with an
opportunity to maximize the value of the Properties.
Third Party Fairness Opinion. Stanger, an independent, nationally
recognized real estate investment banking firm, has been engaged by the
Partnership to render an opinion to the Partnership as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Limited Partners of the valuation ascribed to the
Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price to be received by
the Partnership for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale. Stanger has conducted
certain reviews described herein and has concluded, subject to the assumptions,
qualifications and limitations contained in its opinion, that the valuation
ascribed to the Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price to
be received by the Partnership for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale is
fair, from a financial point of view, to Limited Partners. See "Fairness
Opinion."
Eliminating the Risks of Real Estate Investing. Continued ownership of
the Properties subjects the Partnership to continued risks inherent in real
estate ownership, such as national and local economic trends, supply and demand
factors in the local property market, the cost of operating and maintaining the
physical condition of the Properties and the cost and availability of financing
for prospective buyers of the Properties. No assurance can be given that a
prospective buyer would be willing to pay an amount equal to or greater than the
Purchase Price for the Properties in the future.
Unattractiveness of Other Options. The General Partners do not believe
that other alternatives available to the Partnership are as attractive to the
Partnership as the Sale. One alternative considered by the General Partners was
continued ownership of the Properties by the Partnership. However, the
Partnership is not currently making distributions to the Limited Partners and
the tax benefits resulting from continuing to own the Properties are
diminishing. The General Partners also considered marketing the Properties to
third parties; however, the General Partners do not believe that such
alternative would be in the interests of the Limited Partners, because the
General Partners believe, based on the current uncertainties in the government
subsidized housing market, that it would be difficult to sell the Properties and
do not believe that such a sale would result in a purchase price for the
Properties as high as the Purchase Price offered in connection with the Sale. In
addition, the General Partners believe that marketing the Properties to third
parties would result in significant delays and uncertainties. Several of the
options considered by the General Partners, including the reorganization of the
Partnership as a real estate investment trust, a rollup involving the
Partnership and the use of an "UPREIT" structure, would have (i) been
prohibitively expensive and logistically impractical; (ii) entailed compliance
with the rollup rules promulgated under the Securities Act which may have
resulted in significant delays, thereby potentially causing the Partnership to
miss the currently favorable market conditions for real estate investment
trusts; and (iii) resulted in the Limited Partners receiving equity securities
rather than cash in exchange for their Units. Such publicly traded securities
would be subject to the market risks generally applicable to publicly traded
securities. The General Partners believe that receipt of such securities would
be inconsistent with the Partnership's ultimate objective of returning cash to
the Limited Partners and winding up the business of the Partnership.
Resolving HUD Uncertainty. Eighteen of the nineteen Properties are
subject to Housing Assistance Payments Contracts under Section 8 of the United
States Housing Act. The General Partners anticipate that, for the foreseeable
future, rental rate increases under such contracts will either not be permitted
by HUD or will be negligible and unlikely to exceed increases in operating
expenses. Most of these contracts will expire by the end of 2003 and the
Department of Housing and Urban Development will not renew them under their
current terms. Under recently passed legislation, in most cases project rents
will be reduced and the project mortgages restructured, which is expected to
reduce the cash flow from the Properties and could create adverse tax
consequences to the Limited
656661.11
-17-
<PAGE>
Partners. HUD has not issued implementing regulations on the Section 8
restructuring program, which creates additional uncertainty. Accordingly, the
General Partners believe it may be beneficial to the Limited Partners to avoid
such uncertainties by approving the Sale at this time. See "THE PARTNERSHIP -
Regulatory Arrangements".
Reduced Transaction Costs. The Partnership will not be required to pay
brokerage commissions in connection with the Sale. Brokerage commissions would
typically be paid when selling real property to third parties and the
Partnership would typically be required to pay transaction costs, which are
being borne by the REIT in connection with the Sale. As a result, the Sale is
likely to produce a higher cash distribution to Limited Partners than a
comparable sale to an unaffiliated third party. In addition, the General
Partners believe that selling the Partnership's entire portfolio of real estate
assets in a single transaction (as opposed to a series of individual sales) will
enable the Partnership to dispose of its portfolio in an expedited time frame.
Anticipated Tax Benefits/Tax Law Changes. Subsequent to the formation
of the Partnership, tax law changes reduced the tax benefits anticipated to be
received by Limited Partners by not allowing Limited Partners to currently
deduct many of the losses generated by the Partnership against a Limited
Partner's taxable income from non-passive sources. As a result, Limited Partners
may have a significant amount of suspended losses available to reduce the tax
impact of the taxable gain generated by the Sale. A portion of the taxable gain
may be long-term capital gain, which is currently taxed at a lower rate than
ordinary income. The disparity in the tax rates could be beneficial to Limited
Partners with suspended passive losses attributable to the Partnership because
they will be able to deduct those losses against their ordinary income.
Potential Adverse Effects of the Sale
Limited Partners should also consider the following risk factors in
determining whether to approve or disapprove the Sale:
Loss of Opportunity to Benefit from Future Events. It is possible that
the future performance of the Properties will improve or that prospective buyers
may be willing to pay more for the Properties in the future. It is possible that
Limited Partners might earn a higher return on their investment if the
Partnership retained ownership of the Properties. By approving the Sale, Limited
Partners will also be relinquishing certain current benefits of ownership of the
Properties, such as the ability to deduct tax losses generated by the
Partnership against other passive income. In addition, the proposed
restructuring of FHA-insured mortgages under recently enacted legislation may
result in benefits to Limited Partners due to possible debt forgiveness or other
changes that might increase cash flow.
See "THE PARTNERSHIP - Regulatory Arrangements."
No Solicitation of Third Party Offers. The General Partners have not
solicited any offers from third parties to acquire the Real Estate Interests.
While the General Partners believe that the Sale is on terms more beneficial to
the Partnership than offers that could be obtained from third parties, there is
no assurance that the General Partners would not be able to obtain higher or
better offers if such offers were to be solicited from independent third
parties.
Sale Not Negotiated at Arms Length. Affiliates of the General Partners
will possess a significant ownership interest in the REIT and receive
substantial other benefits from the formation of the REIT and the Sale. Although
a fairness opinion has been obtained, the Purchase Price was not negotiated at
arm's length. The Purchase Price was established by the General Partners and the
Partnership did not retain an independent financial or legal advisor to
negotiate the terms of the Sale.
Conflicts of Interest. In evaluating the proposed Sale, Limited
Partners should consider that Casden is both the sponsor of the REIT and an
affiliate of the General Partners. If the REIT is successfully formed and
capitalized, the current owners of Casden are likely to realize a substantial
increase in the value and liquidity of their investment
656661.11
-18-
<PAGE>
in Casden Properties. The terms of the Sale have been determined on behalf of
the Partnership by officers and directors of Casden who will directly benefit
from the Sale. Certain current directors and officers of Casden are expected to
become directors and officers of the REIT, although it is anticipated that a
majority of the REIT's board will be comprised of independent directors. Unlike
Casden, the Limited Partners will not have the right to participate in the REIT.
It is anticipated that approximately 51% of the equity securities of the REIT
will be held by Casden and its affiliates following the Private Placement, based
on the terms of the Private Placement as currently contemplated.
Tax Consequences. The Sale will have a tax impact on Limited Partners,
producing a long-term capital gain of approximately $8,697 per Unit. It is not
anticipated that the Sale will produce ordinary income due to depreciation
recapture.
Long-term capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income.
The maximum federal tax rate on long-term capital gains is 20% for assets held
more than 18 months and 25% on long-term capital gain attributable to
depreciation recapture. The maximum federal tax rate on ordinary income is
39.6%. The disparity in the tax rates could be beneficial to Limited Partners
with suspended passive losses attributable to the Partnership because they will
be able to deduct such suspended losses against their ordinary income on
disposition of the Real Estate Interests. Limited Partners who have been unable
to use the passive losses generated by the Partnership on a current basis except
as permitted by statutory phase-in rules would have approximately $5,062 per
Unit in suspended losses available to deduct against any of their income. For
such Limited Partners, the Sale should result in a net cash distribution of $436
per Unit, after deduction of federal and state income taxes of $351 per Unit,
assuming federal tax rates of 39.6% on ordinary income and 25% on long-term
capital attributable to depreciation recapture and 20% on any remaining
long-term capital gain on assets held more than 18 months (and an effective 5%
state tax). For Limited Partners who have been able to use all of the passive
losses generated by the Partnership on a current basis, the Sale should result
in a federal income tax cost of approximately $2,609 per Unit for $1822 per unit
in excess of cash distributions. In addition, Limited Partners who have
available all of the suspended passive losses generated by the Partnership, but
whose ordinary income is not taxed at the 39.6% marginal rate may incur a
federal and state income tax cost in excess of the cash distribution made in
connection with the Sale.
For certain tax-exempt Limited Partners, a portion of the taxable gain
noted above will constitute unrelated business taxable income ("UBTI"). However,
assuming a tax-exempt Limited Partner has not recognized the benefit of the
passive losses previously allocated to it, it is expected that very little, if
any, of the gain noted above will be subject to tax. THE SPECIFIC TAX IMPACT OF
THE SALE ON LIMITED PARTNERS SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY LIMITED PARTNERS IN
CONSULTATION WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS.
No Appraisals; Limits on Fairness Opinion. Although the General
Partners have obtained the Fairness Opinion, the General Partners have not
obtained independent appraisals of the Properties to determine their value. In
addition, while the Fairness Opinion address the fairness of the valuation
ascribed to the Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price, it
does not address adjustments to the valuation to arrive at the distributions to
the Limited Partners that will result from the Sale, including the allocation of
such Purchase Price between the Limited Partners and the general partners of the
Local Partnerships, which affects the amount of the consideration to be paid to
the Limited Partners. See "THE SALE - Fairness Opinion."
No Dissenter's Rights. Under the Partnership's Limited Partnership
Agreement and California law, Limited Partners do not have dissenters' rights of
appraisal.
Conditions to Sale. The Sale is subject to certain conditions in
addition to approval of the Sale by the Limited Partners, including consummation
of the Private Placement. Accordingly, even if the Sale is approved by the
Limited Partners and a purchase and sale agreement is entered into, the
consummation of the Sale could be
656661.11
-19-
<PAGE>
delayed for a significant period of time and it is possible that the Sale may
not be consummated. The execution of a purchase and sale agreement with respect
to the Sale could delay the time some or all of the Properties could be sold if
the Sale is not consummated.
Uncertainty of Local General Partner Buyouts. The General Partners are
currently in the process of structuring a buyout of the interests in the Local
Partnerships held by certain of the general partners of the Local Partnerships
that are unaffiliated with Casden. Such buyouts are being negotiated on an
arms-length basis. The REIT expects to pay the general partners of the Local
Partnerships an aggregate of approximately $6,450,000 for their interests in,
and rights to manage, the Local Partnerships. There can be no assurance that the
General Partners will be able to successfully complete buyouts from all of the
unaffiliated general partners on acceptable terms. To the extent that the
General Partners are unable to complete all such buyouts, the Local general
partners who remain in place could prohibit the sale of the Properties owned by
their respective Local Partnerships, and interests in such Properties would not
be transferred in the Sale. There could be an adverse impact on the operating
results of the Partnership. In addition, the winding up of the Partnership's
business could be delayed, perhaps indefinitely. The make-up of the Partnership
after the Sale if less than all of the general partners of the Local
Partnerships consent to the Sale cannot be determined at this time.
Amendments to Partnership Agreement. Approval of the Sale shall be
deemed to include certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement. For example,
the Partnership Agreement prohibits the Partnership from selling any Property or
any interest in a Property if the cash proceeds from such sale would be less
than the state and federal taxes applicable to such sale, calculated using the
maximum tax rates then in effect. The General Partners are seeking an amendment
that modifies such prohibition to allow the Partnership to assume, for purposes
of calculating taxes in connection with a sale of Properties, that all of the
suspended passive losses from the Partnership are available to Limited Partners
to offset ordinary income taxed at the 39.6% federal marginal rate. By approving
such amendment, the Limited Partners are relinquishing a potential benefit
conferred by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. However, the General
Partners believe that it would not be possible to find a buyer willing to
purchase the Properties under the conditions currently specified in the
Partnership Agreement, because compliance with such conditions would result in a
purchase price for the Properties substantially higher than their fair market
value.
Fairness Opinion
Stanger, an independent investment banking firm, was engaged by the
Partnership to conduct an analysis and to render an opinion as to whether the
valuation ascribed to the Properties in connection with determining the Purchase
Price to be paid to the Partnership for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale is
fair, from a financial point of view, to the Limited Partners. Stanger has
advised the General Partners that, subject to the assumptions, limitations and
qualifications contained in its Fairness Opinion, the valuation ascribed to the
Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price to be paid to the
Partnership for the Real Estate Interests in the proposed Sale is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Limited Partners. The full text of the Fairness
Opinion, which contains a description of the matters considered and the
assumptions, limitations and qualifications made, is set forth as Exhibit A
hereto and should be read in its entirety. The summary set forth herein does not
purport to be a complete description of the review performed by Stanger in
rendering the Fairness Opinion. Arriving at a fairness opinion is a complex
process not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or amenable to summary
description.
Except for certain assumptions described more fully below which the
Partnership advised Stanger that it would be reasonable to make, the Partnership
imposed no conditions or limitations on the scope of Stanger's investigation or
the methods and procedures to be followed in rendering the Fairness Opinion. The
Partnership has agreed to indemnify Stanger against certain liabilities arising
out of Stanger's engagement to prepare and deliver the Fairness Opinion.
656661.11
-20-
<PAGE>
Experience. Since its founding in 1978, Stanger and its affiliates have
provided information, research, investment banking and consulting services to
clients located throughout the United States, including major New York Stock
Exchange member firms, insurance companies and over 70 companies engaged in the
management and operation of partnerships and real estate investment trusts. The
investment banking activities of Stanger include financial advisory and fairness
opinion services, asset and securities valuations, industry and company research
and analysis, litigation support and expert witness services, and due diligence
investigations in connection with both publicly registered and privately placed
securities transactions.
Stanger, as part of its investment banking business, is regularly
engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with
mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations and for estate, tax, corporate and other
purposes. Stanger's valuation practice principally involves partnerships,
partnership securities and the assets typically held through partnerships, such
as real estate, oil and gas reserves, cable television systems and equipment
leasing assets. Stanger was selected because of its experience and reputation in
connection with real estate partnerships, real estate assets and mergers and
acquisitions.
Summary of Materials Considered. In the course of Stanger's analysis to
render its opinion, Stanger reviewed: (i) a draft of this Consent Solicitation
Statement related to the Sale in substantially the form which will be
distributed to Limited Partners; (ii) the Partnership's annual reports on Form
10-K for the fiscal years ending December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the
Partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
1997, which reports the Partnership's management has indicated to be the most
current available financial statements; (iii) descriptive information concerning
the Properties provided by management, including location, number of units and
unit mix, age, and amenities; (iv) summary historical operating statements for
the Properties for 1995, 1996 and the nine months ending September 30, 1997; (v)
operating budgets for the Properties for 1997 and forecasts for 1998 for each
Property, as prepared by the General Partners; (vi) information prepared by
management relating to the debt and the HAP Contracts encumbering the
Properties; (vii) information regarding market rental rates and conditions for
apartment properties in the general market area of the Properties and other
information relating to acquisition criteria for apartment properties; and
(viii) conducted other studies, analysis and inquiries as Stanger deemed
appropriate.
In addition, Stanger discussed with management of the Partnership and
the General Partners the market conditions for apartment properties, conditions
in the market for sales/acquisitions of properties similar to that owned by the
Partnership, historical, current and projected operations and performance of the
Properties, the physical condition of the Properties including any deferred
maintenance, and other factors influencing value of the Properties. Stanger also
performed a site inspection of the Properties, reviewed local real estate market
conditions, and discussed with property management personnel conditions in local
apartment rental markets and market conditions for sales and acquisitions of
Properties similar to the Properties.
Summary of Reviews. The following is a summary of certain reviews
conducted by Stanger in connection with and in support of its Fairness Opinion.
The summary of the opinion and reviews of Stanger set forth in this Consent
Solicitation Statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full
text of such opinion.
In preparing its Fairness Opinion, Stanger performed site inspections
of the Properties during December, 1997 and January, 1998. In the course of the
site visits, the physical facilities of the Properties were observed, current
rental and occupancy information for the Properties were obtained, current local
market conditions were reviewed, a sample of similar properties were identified,
and local property management personnel were interviewed concerning the
Properties and local market conditions. Stanger also reviewed and relied upon
information provided by the Partnership and the General Partners, including, but
not limited to, financial schedules of historical and current rental rates,
occupancies, income, expenses, reserve requirements, cash flow and related
financial
656661.11
-21-
<PAGE>
information; property descriptive information including unit mix and rentable
square footage; and information relating to any required capital expenditures
and any deferred maintenance.
Stanger also reviewed historical operating statements for the
Properties for 1995, 1996 and the nine months ending September 30, 1997, the
operating budget for 1997 and operating forecasts for 1998 for each Property, as
prepared by the General Partners and discussed with management the current and
anticipated operating results of the Properties.
In addition, Stanger interviewed management personnel of the
Partnership. Such interviews included discussions of conditions in the local
market, economic and development trends affecting the Properties, historical and
budgeted operating revenues and expenses and occupancies and the physical
condition of the Properties (including any deferred maintenance and other
factors affecting the physical condition of the improvements), projected capital
expenditures and building improvements, the terms of existing debt and the HAP
Contracts encumbering the Properties, and expectations of management regarding
the impact of various regulatory factors and proposed changes on the operating
results of the Properties.
Stanger also reviewed the acquisition criteria used by owners and
investors in the type of real estate owned by the Partnership, utilizing
available published information and information derived from interviews
conducted by Stanger with various real estate owners and investors.
Conclusions. Stanger concluded, based upon its analysis of the
foregoing and the assumptions, qualifications and limitations stated below, as
of the date of the Fairness Opinion, that the valuation ascribed to the
Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price to be paid to the
Partnership for the Real Estate Interests is fair to the Limited Partners from a
financial point of view.
Assumptions, Limitations and Qualifications. In rendering the Fairness
Opinion, Stanger relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the
accuracy and completeness of all financial information and data, and all other
reports and information contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement or that
were provided, made available, or otherwise communicated to Stanger by the
Partnership, the General Partners and/or their affiliates, the Company, the
Local Partnerships or the management of the Properties. Stanger has not
performed an independent appraisal, engineering study or environmental study of
the assets and liabilities of the Partnership. Stanger relied upon the
representations of the General Partners and their affiliates, the Local
Partnerships and the management of the Properties concerning, among other
things, any environmental liabilities, deferred maintenance and estimated
capital expenditure requirements, and the terms and conditions of any debt and
the HAP Contracts encumbering the Properties. Stanger also relied upon the
assurance of the Partnership, Casden, the General Partners and their affiliates,
the Local Partnerships, and the management of the Properties that any financial
statements, projections, budgets, capital expenditure estimates, mortgage debt
and HAP Contract information, value estimates and other information contained in
this Consent Solicitation Statement or provided or communicated to Stanger were
reasonably prepared and adjusted on bases consistent with actual historical
experience and reflect the best currently available estimates and good faith
judgments; that all distributions under HAP Contracts with dividend limitations;
allowable cumulatively since the time of the partnership's investments in each
Local Partnership have been paid in full to the Partnership; that no material
changes have occurred in the value of the Properties or other information
reviewed between the date of such information provided and the date of the
Fairness Opinion; that the Partnership, Casden, the General Partners and their
affiliates, the Local Partnerships and the management of the Properties are not
aware of any information or facts that would cause the information supplied to
Stanger to be incomplete or misleading in any material respect; that the highest
and best use of the Properties is as improved; and that all calculations and
projections were made in accordance with the terms of the regulatory agreements.
656661.11
-22-
<PAGE>
Stanger was not requested to, and therefore did not: (i) select the
method of determining the valuation ascribed to the Properties in connection
with determining the Purchase Price in the Sale; (iii) make any recommendation
to the Partnership or its partners with respect to whether to approve or reject
the proposed Sale; or (iv) express any opinion as to (a) the tax consequences of
the proposed Sale to the Limited Partners, (b) the terms of the Partnership
Agreement or proposed Amendments to the Partnership Agreement, or the terms of
any agreements or contracts between the Partnership and any affiliates of the
General Partners, (c) the General Partners' business decision to effect the
proposed Sale, (d) any adjustments made to the values ascribed to the Properties
to determine the Purchase Price of the Real Estate Interests and the net amounts
distributable to the Limited Partners, including but not limited to, balance
sheet adjustments to reflect the General Partners' estimate of the value of
current and projected net working capital balances and cash and reserve accounts
(including debt service and mortgage escrow amounts, operating and replacement
reserves, and surplus cash reserve amounts and additions) and the income
therefrom of the Partnership or the Local Partnerships, the General Partners
determination that no value should be ascribed to any cash flow from the
Properties in excess of certain limitations on dividends to the Partnership,
amounts ascribed to certain general partner and/or management interests in the
Local Partnerships and other expenses and fees associated with the Sale, or (e)
alternatives to the proposed Sale.
Stanger is not expressing any opinion as to the fairness of any terms
of the proposed Sale other than the valuation ascribed to the Properties in
connection with determining the Purchase Price of the Real Estate Interests paid
to the Partnership. Stanger's opinion is based on business, economic, real
estate market, and other conditions as of the date of its analysis and addresses
the proposed Sale in the context of information available as of the date of its
analysis. Events occurring after such date and before the closing of the
proposed Sale of the Real Estate Interests to the REIT could affect the
Properties or the assumptions used in preparing the Fairness Opinion. Stanger
has no obligation to update the Fairness Opinion on the basis of subsequent
events.
In connection with preparing the Fairness Opinion, Stanger was not
engaged to, and consequently did not, prepare any written report or compendium
of its analysis for internal or external use beyond the analysis set forth in
Exhibit A.
Compensation and Material Relationships. Stanger has been retained by
the General Partners and their affiliates to provide fairness opinions to the
Partnership and the other Casden Partnerships included in the REIT Transaction.
Stanger will be paid an aggregate fee of up to approximately $490,000, plus
$4,100 per property by the Casden Partnerships, a portion of which is payable
upon consummation of the REIT Transaction. The portion of the fee allocable to
the Partnership is $30,000, plus $4,100 per Property. In addition, Stanger is
entitled to reimbursement for reasonable legal, travel and out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in making site visits and preparing the Fairness Opinion,
subject to an aggregate maximum of up to approximately $1,000, plus $600 per
Property, and is entitled to indemnification against certain liabilities,
including certain liabilities under federal securities laws.
Alternatives to the Sale
The following is a brief discussion of alternatives to the Sale
considered by the General Partners and the possible benefits and disadvantages
of such alternatives:
Continuation of the Partnership. One alternative considered by the
General Partners was the continuation of the Partnership in accordance with its
existing business plan and its Partnership Agreement. The Partnership is not
currently realizing any cash flow that is available for distribution to the
Limited Partners and does not anticipate realizing sufficient cash flow in the
future to enable it to make distributions to Limited Partners. Limited Partners
will realize an aggregate of approximately $830,000 in current passive activity
rental losses for 1997. Depreciation deductions that are primarily responsible
for generating losses realized by the Limited Partners should continue to
656661.11
-23-
<PAGE>
decline until the end of the depreciable lives of the Properties, when taxable
income to Limited Partners will exceed cash distributions. In addition, if the
Partnership continues to own the Properties, it will eventually have to sell the
Properties and such sales could have the disadvantages of individual sales and
lose the benefits of the current opportune time to sell the Properties. Because
there is no active trading market for the Units, Limited Partners may not be
able to liquidate their investment in the Units while the Partnership remains in
existence.
Marketing the Properties for Sale to Third Parties. The General
Partners also considered marketing the Properties to third parties. However, the
General Partners do not believe that such alternative would be in the best
interests of the Limited Partners, because the General Partners believe that
such a sale would not result in a purchase price for the Properties as high as
the Purchase Price offered in connection with the Sale. In light of the limited
cash flow currently generated by the Properties and the potentially adverse
consequences of the recent changes in the laws and policies applicable to HAP
Contracts, the General Partners do not believe that an attractive market for the
Properties currently exists. The General Partners believe it would be difficult
to find a buyer for the Properties as a group, and that selling the Properties
on a Property-by-Property basis would involve an extensive negotiating process
over an extended period of time. During the continuation of such process, the
Partnership would continue to be responsible for all costs relating to the
Properties and there would likely be higher transaction costs, such as brokers'
fees and attorneys' fees, relating to sale of the Properties if they were sold
individually.
Rollup. The General Partners considered combining the Casden
Partnerships into a new corporation that would qualify as a REIT entity. As a
result of such a transaction, the Limited Partners would have received shares of
stock in the REIT (or partnership interests convertible into REIT shares), which
would have been listed on a national stock exchange. Such a transaction would be
expected to (a) provide investors in the new entity with the opportunity to
liquidate their investment through the sale of the shares received in the
transaction, (b) permit distribution to investors of a simpler federal income
tax Form 1099-DIV (rather than Schedule K-1), and (c) provide investors with the
potential for receiving securities with a greater value than the proceeds they
will receive as a result of the Sale. Furthermore, such an entity would provide
increased asset diversification and, due to its size, improved access to capital
markets.
The General Partners believe, however, that such a transaction would
have significant disadvantages. As a result of new legislation and regulations,
they believe that obtaining necessary regulatory approvals for a rollup would be
very difficult, expensive and time-consuming. The General Partners were not
confident that a rollup transaction could be completed within a reasonably
practical time period. Furthermore, the General Partners believe that there
could be significant selling pressure on the securities issued in connection
with a rollup and that such selling pressure might cause the price of the stock
of the rollup entity to decline following completion of the rollup transaction.
Another disadvantage of a rollup transaction is that the transaction
would cause the Limited Partners to incur a tax on the gain reflected in the
value of the stock of the new entity. The General Partners determined that
Limited Partners would not be able to defer taxation through the use of an
UPREIT structure due to difficulties likely to be experienced in obtaining
approval from various states for the distribution of operating partnership
interests. Unless a Limited Partner sold all or a portion of the securities
received in the transaction, such Limited Partner would have no additional cash
with which to pay the taxes which would result from the completion of a rollup
transaction. The need for cash to pay the taxes on the transaction could cause
downward pressure on the price of the stock. In addition, a Limited Partner
would incur brokerage commissions on the sale of any securities received in a
rollup transaction, thereby reducing the net proceeds received in the
transaction.
Reorganization into a REIT. The General Partners considered the
advisability of reorganizing the Partnership as a corporation treated as a real
estate investment trust. If approved, such a transaction would have provided
some advantages to the Limited Partners. Such a reorganization would be expected
to (a) provide investors
656661.11
-24-
<PAGE>
in the reorganized entity with liquidity, (b) permit distribution to investors
of a simpler federal income tax form 1099- DIV (compared to Schedule K-1), and
(c) potentially be formed tax free to the Limited Partners. The General Partners
were advised that the reorganization of the Partnership into a REIT has a number
of significant disadvantages. For example, the small size of the reorganized
Partnership, the lack of diversification, the degree of debt relative to equity,
and the absence of internalized, integrated management would result in limited
markets for the shares of the newly formed real estate investment trust. As a
result, the General Partners were advised that it would be unlikely that the
real estate investment trust shares would perform well in the market. In
addition, the General Partners believe that the size of the resulting real
estate investment trust would not enable it to access the capital markets on an
advantageous basis.
Recommendation of the General Partners; Fairness
The recommendation of the General Partners in favor of the Sale is
based upon their belief that the Sale is fair to the Limited Partners for, among
others, the following reasons: (a) their belief that the terms and conditions of
the Sale, including the Purchase Price, are fair to the Limited Partners of the
Partnership; (b) their belief that the alternatives available to the Partnership
are not as attractive to the Limited Partners as the Sale; (c) their belief that
now may be an opportune time for the Partnership to sell the Properties, given
current conditions in the real estate and capital markets; and (d) their belief
that the Purchase Price represents a higher amount than a third party would
offer the Partnership for the Properties.
The General Partners have not obtained real estate appraisals to
establish the fair market value of the Properties, but, based upon their
significant real estate experience, they believe that the valuation ascribed to
the Properties in connection with determining the Purchase Price is not less
than the fair market value of the Properties. In addition, Stanger has opined
that the "Aggregate Property Valuation" (as defined below) used in determining
the Purchase Price for the Real Estate Interests is fair to the Limited Partners
from a financial point of view.
The Purchase Price was determined by the General Partners. The General
Partners valued the Real Estate Interests using the following methodology. For
Local Partnerships with HAP Contracts with expiration dates more than ten years
in the future or no HAP Contracts, the General Partners determined the value by
taking the aggregate net operating income before interest expense and management
fees (as adjusted for dividend restrictions with respect to properties subject
to dividend restrictions) for such Local Partnership for 1996, less capital
expenditures, and applied a capitalization rate of 11%. For Local Partnerships
with HAP Contracts with expiration dates seven to ten years in the future, the
General Partners followed the same procedure, but applied a capitalization rate
of 12%. For Local Partnerships with HAP Contracts expiring in less than seven
years, the General Partners calculated such Local Partnership's distributions
for 1996 (or in certain cases used a three year average where the General
Partners did not believe that the 1996 distributions were representative), added
the management fees payable to the general partner of such Local Partnership for
1996, assumed that these distributions would be received for the balance of the
term of the HAP Contracts and discounted these future distributions at a
discount rate of 10%. In selecting the capitalization rates, the General
Partners took into account the likelihood that cash flow would be significantly
reduced after expiration of the current HAP Contracts and used a higher
capitalization rate if the HAP Contracts expired earlier. With respect to the
Local Partnerships with HAP Contracts expiring in less than seven years, the
General Partners assumed that the residual value of the Properties would be
minimal upon expiration of the respective HAP Contracts, due to the
uncertainties as to future cash flow following the expiration of the term of the
HAP Contracts.
Based on such determination, the General Partners determined that the
Properties owned by the Local Partnerships had an aggregate value of $57,295,877
(the "Aggregate Property Valuation"). The General Partners subtracted from the
Aggregate Property Valuation the aggregate estimated purchase price to be paid
to the general partners of the Local Partnerships to buy out their general
partnership interests in the Local Partnerships and their
656661.11
-25-
<PAGE>
right to future management fees of $6,448,190 and the outstanding
mortgage indebtedness and soft indebtedness of the Local Partnerships of
$52,217,882. However, in no event was the valuation of any of the Real Estate
Interests with respect to any of the Local Partnership reduced below zero. The
cost to buy out the general partners of the Local Partnerships is based on
arms-length negotiations between the General Partners and the general partners
of the Local Partnerships. However, while the costs of such buyout will be paid
by the REIT and the buy out will benefit the REIT, such costs are being
indirectly borne by the Limited Partners to the extent that it reduces the
valuation of the Real Estate Interests. These calculations resulted in
distributable cash out of the proceeds of the Sale of $1,571,673.
The General Partners believe that the method used to determine the
Purchase Price was reasonable in light of the fact that the Partnership does not
own the Properties directly and that any sale of the Properties is subject to
the approval of the general partners of the Local Partnerships. In addition, as
a result of the recent changes in law and policy relating to HAP Contracts, and
the risks relating to the restructuring of the FHA-insured mortgage loans under
MAHRAA, the General Partners believe that there is a great deal of uncertainty
as to the market for the Properties. Accordingly, the General Partners believe
that the Purchase Price and is fair and reasonable and exceeds the price that
the Partnership is likely to receive if the Real Estate Interests were to be
sold to a third party or parties. It should be noted that, for purposes of
calculating the value of the Real Estate Interests, the General Partners
assumed, based on their belief, that the residual values of the Properties upon
expiration of the respective HAP Contracts applicable to such Properties will be
minimal. The General Partners made the same assumption when determining the
capitalization rates used in their valuation calculations. Different assumptions
would likely have resulted in different valuations for the Real Estate
Interests.
In determining the valuation of the Real Estate Interests, no
adjustment was made for the amount by which the value of assets other than the
Properties exceeded liabilities other than mortgage indebtedness because the
General Partners do not believe that these are material (other than the Reserve
Accounts referred to below). In addition, pursuant to certain state housing
finance statutes and regulations, certain of the Local Partnerships are subject
to limitations on the distributions of dividends to the Partnership. Such
statutes and regulations require such Local Partnerships to hold cash flows in
excess of such dividend limitations in Reserve Accounts that may be used only
for limited purposes. The Purchase Price was calculated without attributing
value to the Reserve Accounts. The General Partners believe that state
regulatory considerations limiting the availability of the Reserve Accounts to
the Partnership have the effect of substantially reducing or eliminating
entirely any value attributable to such Reserve Accounts. Nonetheless, the REIT
may be able to realize a benefit in the future by obtaining a reduction in the
amount required to be held in the Reserve Accounts.
The General Partners relied on the following qualitative factors in
determining that the Sale is fair to the Limited Partners:
o The Properties do not currently produce significant cash flow and
the Partnership has not made distributions to date. The
Partnership's investment in the Properties was initially
structured primarily to obtain benefits from tax credits and
depreciation, and not to provide cash distributions.
o As a result of recent changes in law and policies, HUD will no
longer renew HAP Contracts at current rental levels and instead
will renew HAP Contracts at market rental rates. These changes are
expected to reduce the cash flow generated by the Properties upon
expiration of the HAP Contracts and, in the absence of a
restructuring of the FHA-insured mortgage loans under MAHRAA, are
not expected to produce sufficient cash flow to pay debt service.
While MAHRAA provides for restructuring of the FHA-insured
mortgage loans, the terms of such restructurings are uncertain and
the General Partners believe that the cash flows from the
656661.11
-26-
<PAGE>
Properties are likely to be reduced following the reductions under
the HAP Contracts, even assuming successful restructuring of the
FHA-insured mortgage loans under MAHRAA. In addition, there are
significant uncertainties as to the tax effect of the
restructuring under MAHRAA, which could result in forgiveness of
indebtedness income or original issue discount, increasing the
phantom income to limited partners from the Partnership.
o Due to the Partnership's limited current cash flow and the
uncertainties created by MAHRAA, the General Partners do not
believe that the Properties could be sold to a third party on
comparable terms to the proposed Sale, either individually or as a
group.
The REIT has offered to purchase the Real Estate Interests because the
acquisition of such interests is an important component in the formation of the
REIT and such acquisition may assist the REIT in carrying out its strategy of
acquiring the FHA-insured mortgage loans encumbering the Properties and
generating cash flow in connection with such loans.
Set forth below are estimates of the value of the Units based on
secondary market prices. It should be noted that the estimated values are based
on certain assumptions, including selling costs and other expenses, costs,
offsets and contingencies attributable to the sale of assets and liquidation of
the Partnership, and such estimates may not be a reliable basis for valuing the
Units. While the General Partners believe they have a reasonable basis for the
assumptions made, it is unlikely that all of the assumptions employed by the
General Partners will prove to be accurate in all material respects. Such
assumptions were selected to simplify the analysis and may not approximate the
actual experience of the Partnership. The estimated values of the Units would
have been different if the General Partners had made different assumptions. The
original cost per Unit was $5,000.
The following table sets forth certain measures of value and permits a
comparison of these measures against the amount each Limited Partner would
receive from the Sale and subsequent liquidation of the Partnership:
Secondary Market Prices(2)
-----------------------------------------
Amount to be
Received from
Sale and
Liquidation(1) High Low
- --------------------- ----------------- --------------------
$787.00 $250.00 $132.50
- ---------------------
(1) This amount is an estimate of the total amount expected to be distributed
per Unit to Limited Partners as a result of the liquidation of the
Partnership after the Sale. This amount includes the proceeds of the Sale
plus cash available for distribution. This amount will be distributed in
one or a series of distributions.
(2) Based on the high and low value of secondary market trades during the
twelve months ending December 31, 1997 as compiled by NAPICO. NAPICO has
advised that its methodology for compiling trade prices is as follows:
trade price information reflects per Unit transaction prices for trades
involving the purchase of Units by third-party investors during the
applicable period. Firms supplying trade price data are instructed to
provide information only on those transactions whereby third-party
investors acquired Units from or through such firms. Due to commission and
mark-ups, sellers of Units typically receive less than the amounts paid
for Units by buyers as set forth in the table.
656661.11
-27-
<PAGE>
The Limited Partners, in reviewing these measures of value, should
carefully review the procedures that have been followed in computing these
measures and, in particular, should recognize the limitations of these measures
as indicators of the fair market value of the Units or of the assets of the
Partnerships, as the case may be.
Secondary and Market Prices for Units. The information in the table
above under the heading "Secondary Market Trades" shows the highest and lowest
secondary market prices for the Units as reported to NAPICO by certain secondary
market firms involved in sales of the Units over the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 1997. When gathering such data, NAPICO requests that the recorded
prices per Unit include any mark-ups for Units sold by the firms acting as
principals in the secondary market transactions and include any commissions
charged by them for facilitating the transactions, unless the firms acted as
retail brokers.
No established market for the Units was ever expected to develop and
the secondary market transactions for the Units have been limited and sporadic.
It is not known to what extent the transactions in the secondary market are
between buyers and willing sellers, each having access to relevant information
regarding the financial affairs of the Partnerships, expected value of their
assets, and their prospects for the future. Many transactions in the secondary
market are believed to be distressed sales where sellers are highly motivated to
dispose of the Units and willing to accept substantial discounts from what might
otherwise be regarded as the fair value of the interest being sold, to
facilitate the sales. Secondary market prices generally do not reflect the
current market of the Partnerships' assets, nor are they indicative of total
return, since prior cash distributions and tax benefits received by the original
investor are not reflected in the price. Nonetheless, notwithstanding these
qualifications, the secondary market prices, to the extent that the reported
data are reliable, are indicative of the prices at which the Units trade in the
illiquid secondary markets.
The General Partners did not give any specific weight to any one of the
foregoing factors but viewed them in the aggregate in supporting their fairness
determination. The General Partners recommend that the Sale be approved by the
Limited Partners. Limited Partners should note, however, that the General
Partners' recommendation is subject to inherent conflicts of interest. See
"CONFLICTS OF INTEREST."
Other Measures of Value. The General Partners have not calculated a
going concern value or a liquidation value of the Units. Due to the anticipated
reduction in HAP payments at the expiration of HAP Contracts, as described
above, and the uncertainties relating to the impact in cash flow of the
restructuring of the FHA-insured mortgage loans, the Company does not believe
there is a sufficient basis to estimate future cash flow from the Properties and
calculate going concern value. Similarly, due to the limited cash flow from the
Properties and the potential impact of the anticipated reductions in payments
under HAP Contracts, and the absence of future tax benefits from the Properties,
the Company does not believe that there is a sufficient market for estimating
the fair market value of the Properties. The General Partners have not
calculated an estimate of the liquidation value of the Units assuming that the
Partnership's Properties were sold at their book value. The net book value of
the Properties (i.e. book value less mortgage indebtedness) is less than zero,
which is common with real estate that has been held for an extended period. The
book value of the real estate assets is based upon the original cost of those
assets, increased for capital expenditures and reduced for accumulated
depreciation, computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
IV. AMENDMENTS TO THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
Certain Amendments to the Partnership Agreement are necessary in
connection with the consummation of the Sale. The Partnership Agreement
currently prohibits a sale of any of the Properties to the General Partners or
656661.11
-28-
<PAGE>
their affiliates. Accordingly, consent of the Limited Partners is being sought
for an amendment to the Partnership Agreement that eliminates such prohibition.
The Partnership Agreement also requires that any agreement entered into
between the Partnership and the General Partners or any affiliate of the General
Partners shall provide that it may be canceled at any time by the Partnership
without penalty upon 60 days' prior written notice. It is the position of the
General Partners that the Termination Provision does not apply to the Sale;
nevertheless, the General Partners are seeking approval of the Limited Partners
to an amendment to the Partnership Agreement that eliminates the Termination
Provision in connection with the Sale and any future disposition of the
Properties.
The Partnership Agreement also prohibits the Partnership from selling
any Property or any interest in a Property if the cash proceeds from such sale
would be less than the state and federal taxes applicable to such sale,
calculated using the maximum tax rates then in effect (the "Tax Requirement").
The General Partners are seeking the approval of the Limited Partners to an
amendment to the Partnership Agreement that modifies the Tax Requirement so as
to allow the Partnership to calculate the net tax liability from a sale of a
Property or Properties by subtracting from the tax payable on the gain from such
sale the tax benefit resulting from the ability to deduct the Partnership's
suspended passive losses against ordinary income, assuming that the Limited
Partner has sufficient ordinary income that would otherwise have been taxed at
the 39.6% marginal tax rate for federal income tax purposes to fully utilize
such losses at such rate, and assuming a state income tax rate of 5%.
By approving such amendment, the Limited Partners are relinquishing a
potential benefit conferred by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. However,
the General Partners believe that it would not be possible to find a buyer
willing to purchase the Properties under the conditions currently specified in
the Partnership Agreement, because compliance with such conditions would result
in a purchase price for the Properties substantially higher than their fair
market value.
The consent of Limited Partners holding a majority of outstanding Units
is required in order to amend the Partnership Agreement.
V. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
General
Due to the key role of affiliates of the General Partners in the
organization of the REIT, and the relationships among the General Partners, the
Casden Partnerships, Casden and Casden's directors and officers, the General
Partners have certain conflicts of interest in recommending the Sale to the
Limited Partners. Some important conflicts are:
1. The terms of the Sale were established by the REIT and the General
Partners, which are related parties. Accordingly, the terms and conditions of
the proposed Sale were not determined through arms-length negotiations. There
can be no assurance that arms-length negotiations would not have resulted in
terms more favorable to the Limited Partners.
2. Although the General Partners are accountable to the Partnership and
the Limited Partners as fiduciaries and are obligated to exercise good faith and
fair dealing toward other members of the Partnership, and although Stanger
provided an independent opinion with respect to the fairness of the valuation
ascribed to the Properties in connection with determing the Purchase Price, from
a financial point of view, no independent financial or legal was engaged to
determine the Purchase Price or to represent the interests of the Limited
Partners. There can be no assurance that the involvement of financial or legal
advisors, or other third
656661.11
-29-
<PAGE>
parties, on behalf of the Limited Partners would not have resulted in a higher
Purchase Price or terms more favorable to the Limited Partners.
3. If the REIT Transaction is consummated, affiliates of the General
Partners will receive substantial interests in the REIT in exchange for the
contribution of real property assets and the property management operations of
Casden, including direct or indirect interests in the General Partners. The
General Partners anticipate that they will receive significant economic benefits
as a result of receiving interests in the REIT. Such interests in the REIT are
likely to enjoy greater liquidity than the General Partners' current interests
in the Partnership if the REIT successfully completes an initial public offering
following its initial formation as a private REIT. Unlike Casden, the Limited
Partners will not have the right to participate in the REIT. It is anticipated
that approximately 51% of the equity securities of the REIT will be held by
Casden and its affiliates following the Private Placement, based on the terms of
the Private Placement as currently contemplated. The implied value of the REIT's
securities (based on the pricing of the REIT's securities in the Private
Placement and in contemplated subsequent public offerings, if consummated) that
will be attributed to the other assets being contributed to the REIT may exceed
the Purchase Price paid by the REIT for such interest in the Properties because
of (i) the combination of real estate assets and businesses and the resultant
opportunities for enhanced access to equity capital and financing alternatives
that are likely to be available to the REIT; (ii) the expected liquidity of the
REIT's capital stock; (iii) the current favorable public market valuation of
real estate investment trusts; (iv) the inclusion of certain real estate
business and management companies owned by affiliates of Casden in the REIT; and
(v) the greater asset diversification of the REIT, and other factors. Such
realization of excess value is dependent on economic, interest rate and real
estate market trends, as well as market conditions at the time of the formation
of the REIT and the Private Placement (and subsequent public offering) of its
securities and, if realized, will likely provide affiliates of the General
Partners with significant economic benefits.
4. It is anticipated that the return from the interests in the REIT to
be received by the General Partners and their affiliates in connection with the
REIT Transaction will exceed the return such persons currently receive from the
real estate assets such persons will contribute or sell to the REIT.
5. Substantially all of the officers and employees of Casden and its
affiliates will be employed as officers and employees of the REIT. For their
services as officers, directors or employees of the REIT, such persons will be
paid a salary and may be eligible to participate in the REIT's bonus plan,
option plan and other employee benefit plans. In addition, through the REIT
Transaction, the REIT will ensure continuity of the business established by the
General Partners and their affiliates. The Properties, if acquired by the REIT
will continue to be managed by the REIT's officers and employees for as long as
the REIT continues to own the Properties. In addition, unlike the Partnership,
the REIT will have the ability to reinvest proceeds from any future sale of the
Properties. The REIT will therefore afford ongoing employment opportunities for
those persons currently employed to assist with the administration and
day-to-day operations of the Properties and the REIT.
6. The General Partners are currently in the process of structuring a
buyout of the interests in the Local Partnerships held by the general partners
of the Local Partnerships. There can be no assurance that the General Partners
will be able to successfully complete the buyouts from such unaffiliated general
partners on acceptable terms. To the extent that the ultimate cost of such
buyouts exceeds the General Partners' current estimates of such cost, the
distributions to Limited Partners resulting from the Sale will be reduced.
Fiduciary Responsibility
The General Partners are accountable to the Partnership and the Limited
Partners as fiduciaries and consequently are obligated to exercise good faith
and fair dealing toward other members of the Partnership. The Partnership
Agreement provides that the General Partners and their officers, directors,
employees, agents, affiliates,
656661.11
-30-
<PAGE>
subsidiaries and assigns are entitled to be indemnified for any claim, loss,
expense, liability, action or damage resulting from any act or omission
performed or omitted by them pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, but the
General Partners are not entitled to be indemnified or held harmless for any act
or omission constituting fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty or willful
misconduct. In addition, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the General
Partners have no liability or obligation to the other partners or the
Partnership for any decision made or action taken in connection with the
discharge of their duties under the Partnership Agreement, if such decision or
action was made or taken in good faith.
If a claim is made against the General Partners in connection with
their actions on behalf of the Partnership with respect to the Sale, the General
Partners expect that they will seek to be indemnified by the Partnership with
respect to such claim. Any expenses (including legal fees) incurred by the
General Partners in defending such claim shall be advanced by the Partnership
prior to the final disposition of such claim, subject to the receipt by the
Partnership of an undertaking by the General Partners to repay any amounts
advanced if it is determined that the General Partners' actions constituted
fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, or failure to comply with any
representation, condition or agreement contained in the Partnership Agreement.
As a result of these indemnification rights, a Limited Partner's remedy with
respect to claims against the General Partners relating to the General Partners'
involvement in the sale of the Partnership's interest in the Properties to the
REIT could be more limited than the remedy which would have been available
absent the existence of these rights in the Partnership Agreement. A successful
claim for indemnification, including the expenses of defending a claim made,
would reduce the Partnership's assets by the amount paid.
VI. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table sets forth selected historical financial and
operating data of the Partnership for the nine months ended September 30, 1997
and September 30, 1996 and the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994,
1993 and 1992.
The selected historical financial and operating data of the Partnership
for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and September 30, 1996 are derived
from unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Partnership which, in
the opinion of the General Partners, include all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring items unless otherwise disclosed) necessary for a fair
presentation of the Partnership's financial position and results of operations.
The results set forth for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and September
30, 1996 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full
year.
656661.11
-31-
<PAGE>
The following information should be read in conjunction with the
Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10- K and its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
attached hereto as Annexes B and C, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loss From Operations............... $ (287,542) $ (287,216) $ (305,798) $ (336,239) $ (289,477)
Distributions From Limited
Partnerships Recognized as Income.. 215,140 221,276 218,651 245,331 220,731
Equity in Income of Limited
Partnerships and amortization of
acquisition costs.................. 371,644 455,651 393,230 262,614 252,969
Net Income......................... $ 299,242 $ 389,711 $ 306,083 $ 171,706 184,223
Net Income allocated to Limited
Partners........................... $ 296,249 $ 385,814 $ 303,022 $ 169,989 $ 182,381
Net Income per Limited Partnership
Interest........................... $ 38 $ 50 $ 39 $ 22 $ 23
Total assets....................... $ 3,259,178 $ 2,979,971 $ 2,592,397 $ 2,255,550 $ 2,091,002
Investments in Limited Partnerships $ 1,305,672 $ 1,103,818 $ 884,383 $ 659,376 $ 653,364
Nine Months Ended
September 30
---------------------------------------
1997 1996
---- ----
Loss From Operations............... $ (278,003) $ (211,381)
Distributions From Limited
Partnerships Recognized as Income.. 404,783 197,297
Equity in Income of Limited
Partnerships and amortization of
acquisition costs.................. 291,000 375,000
Net Income......................... $ 417,780 $ 360,916
Net Income allocated to Limited
Partners........................... $ 413,107 $ 357,306
Net Income per Limited Partnership
Interest........................... $ .54 $ .46
Total assets....................... $ 3,707,273 $ 3,311,448
Investments in Limited Partnerships $ 1,475,659 $ 1,339,185
</TABLE>
VII. CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of certain material tax consequences
relating to the proposed Sale and the distribution of approximately $787 per
Unit. However, each Limited Partner is urged to consult his, her or its own tax
advisor for a more detailed explanation of the specific tax consequences to such
Limited Partner from the Sale.
Upon consummation of the Sale, and subject to the passive activity
rules described below, each Limited Partner will recognize his, her or its share
of the taxable gain of the Partnership to the extent that the sum of (i) the
cash, plus (ii) the fair market value of any property received by the
Partnership on the Sale plus (iii) the outstanding principal amount of the
Partnership's nonrecourse indebtedness, exceeds the Partnership's adjusted basis
for the Properties. Gain realized by the Partnership on the Sale will generally
be a Section 1231 gain, (i.e., long-term capital gain, except for the portion
thereof which is taxable as ordinary income due to depreciation recapture). A
Partner's share of gains and losses from Section 1231 transactions from all
sources would be netted and would be taxed as capital gains or constitute
ordinary losses, as the case may be. A net Section 1231 gain for a taxable year
will be treated as capital gain only to the extent such gain exceeds the net
Section 1231 losses for the five most recent prior taxable years not previously
recaptured. Any gain attributable to a Limited Partner's share of depreciation
recapture will be taxed at ordinary income rates.
The taxable income realized by each Limited Partner by reason of the
Sale should be characterized as income from a "passive activity" and may be
offset by a Limited Partner's available "passive activity losses" (including
suspended losses). Losses from passive activities may only be offset against
income from passive activities or may be deducted in full when the taxpayer
disposes of the passive activity from which the loss arose. However, pursuant to
a transitional rule contained in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "1986 Act"), a
certain
656661.11
-32-
<PAGE>
percentage of losses from a passive activity which was held by the taxpayer on
the date of the enactment of the 1986 Act (i.e., October 22, 1986) and at all
times thereafter was permitted to offset any type of income during the years
1987 through 1990.
It is estimated that as a consequence of the Sale, each Limited Partner
will have taxable income equal to approximately $8,697 per Unit all of which
will constitute long-term capital gain. The income tax consequences of the Sale
to any Limited Partner depends in large part upon the amount of losses that were
allocated to such Limited Partner by the Partnership and the amount of such
losses which were applied by such Limited Partner to offset his or her taxable
income. If a Limited Partner has not utilized any of the passive activity losses
allocated to such Limited Partner in excess of those amounts permitted under the
transitional rule relief described above, the Limited Partner will have a net
federal and state tax liability of approximately $351. The anticipated cash
distribution of approximately $787 per Unit would be sufficient to pay the
federal and state tax liability arising from the Sale, assuming a federal
capital gains rate of 25% and that Limited Partners have suspended passive
losses of $5,062 per Unit from the Partnership and assuming an effective state
tax rate of 5% and would result in a net distribution, after federal and state
income taxes, of $436. The net tax liability was calculated by deducting from
the tax payable on the gain from the sale (calculated at a federal tax rate of
25% on gains attributable to depreciation not recaptured as ordinary income) the
tax benefit resulting from the ability to deduct the suspended passive losses
against ordinary income, assuming that the Limited Partner has sufficient
ordinary income which would otherwise have been taxed at the 39.6% marginal tax
rate for federal income tax purposes to fully utilize such losses at such rate,
and assuming a state income tax rate of 5%. In addition to assuming federal
income tax rates, the calculation of income tax liability of a Limited Partner
assumes that such Limited Partner has no net Section 1231 losses for the five
most recent prior taxable years. If this latter assumption is not applicable to
a Limited Partner, the income tax liability of such Limited Partner could
increase because certain income would be taxed at ordinary, instead of capital
gains tax rates. Limited Partners are advised to consult with their own tax
advisors for specific application of the tax rules where the above-described
assumption is not applicable. The foregoing does not take into consideration the
effect of any local tax liabilities that may be applicable to the Sale.
To the extent that a Limited Partner was able to utilize more passive
activity losses than were available under the transitional rules (e.g., because
such Limited Partner had passive income from other sources) to offset his, her
or its taxable income, the estimated federal income tax liability of such
Limited Partner would substantially increase. Thus, for example, if a Limited
Partner had no suspended passive activity losses to carry forward, it is
estimated that such Limited Partner would have a federal income tax liability
equal to approximately $2,609 per Unit, or $1822 in excess of the distribution
of $787 per Unit. In addition, to the extent that a Limited Partner does not
have sufficient ordinary income taxed at a 39.6% marginal federal rate to fully
utilize the suspended passive losses against such income, the Limited Partner's
net tax benefits from the Sale would be reduced and the Limited Partner is
likely to be incur net tax costs in excess of the cash distributions which will
be received.
BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW THE AMOUNT OF LOSSES ANY LIMITED
PARTNER HAS APPLIED TO OFFSET HIS, HER OR ITS TAXABLE INCOME, THE GENERAL
PARTNERS CANNOT ESTIMATE THE INCOME TAX LIABILITY OF EACH LIMITED PARTNER
ARISING FROM THE SALE, THEREFORE, EACH LIMITED PARTNER SHOULD CONSULT HIS, HER
OR ITS TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF CONSENTING TO THE
SALE WITH RESPECT TO SUCH LIMITED PARTNER'S OWN TAX SITUATION.
VIII. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On June 25, 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") entered into a consent decree with NAPICO, three members of
NAPICO's senior management and three affiliated entities (collectively,
656661.11
-33-
<PAGE>
the "NAPICO Affiliates") in connection with their alleged roles in two separate
series of securities laws violations. In connection therewith, certain NAPICO
Affiliates agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing securities law
violations. In addition, National Partnership Equities, Inc. ("NPEI"), a
brokerage firm affiliated with NAPICO, agreed to undergo a review of certain of
its policies and procedures and pay a $100,000 penalty. The NAPICO Affiliates
consented to the above sanctions and relief without admitting or denying the
Commission's findings.
The two series of securities law violations relate to the NAPICO
Affiliates' (i) satisfying the minimum offering threshold of a "part or none"
private placement by utilizing a subscription from a non-bona fide investor and
failing to disclose such violation in subsequent offering materials for such
private placement and (ii) failing to disclose in the periodic reports for
another of its programs the fact that such program's cash was used to pay the
expenses of properties not owned by such program that were managed by an
affiliate and failing to maintain adequate internal controls to detect such
violations.
IX. LIMITED PARTNERS CONSENT PROCEDURE
Distribution of Solicitation Materials
This Consent Solicitation Statement and the related Consent are first
being mailed to Limited Partners on or about ________ __, 1998. Only Limited
Partners of record on ___________, 1998 (the "Record Date") will be given notice
of, and allowed to give their consent regarding, the matters addressed in this
Consent Solicitation Statement.
This Consent Solicitation Statement, together with the Consent and the
letter from the General Partners, constitute the Solicitation Materials to be
distributed to the Limited Partners to obtain their votes for or against the
Sale. The Solicitation Period is the time frame during which Limited Partners
may vote for or against the Sale. The Solicitation Period will commence upon the
date of delivery of this Consent Solicitation Statement and will continue until
the earlier of (i) _________, 1998 or such later date as may be determined by
the General Partners and (ii) the date upon which the General Partners determine
that a Majority Vote has been obtained. At their discretion, the General
Partners may elect to extend the Solicitation Period. Under no circumstances
will the Solicitation Period be extended beyond ______________, 1998. Any
Consents delivered to the Partnership prior to the termination of the
Solicitation Period will be effective provided that such Consents have been
properly completed, signed and delivered.
As permitted by the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership has not
scheduled a special meeting of the Limited Partners to discuss the Solicitation
Materials or the terms of the Sale.
Voting Procedures and Consents
Limited Partners of record as of the Record Date will receive notice
of, and be entitled to vote, with respect to the Sale. Consent to the Sale will
also include consent to Amendments to the Partnership Agreement that (i)
eliminate a restriction against sales of Partnership assets to affiliates of the
General Partners; (ii) eliminate the Termination Provision in connection with
the Sale and (iii) modify the Tax Requirement to allow the Partnership to
assume, for purposes of calculating taxes, that all of the passive losses from
the Partnership are available to Limited Partners.
The Consent included in the Solicitation Materials constitutes the
ballot to be used by Limited Partners in casting their votes for or against the
Sale. By marking this ballot, the Limited Partner may either vote "for,"
"against" or "abstain" as to the Partnership's participation in the Sale. Once a
Limited Partner has voted, he may
656661.11
-34-
<PAGE>
not revoke his vote unless he submits a second Consent, properly signed and
completed, together with a letter indicating that this prior Consent has been
revoked, and such second Consent is received by _________ (the "Tabulator")
prior to expiration of the Solicitation Period. See "Withdrawal and Change of
Election Rights" below.
The Sale will not be completed unless it is approved by a Majority
Vote. See "THE SALE-- Conditions" for a discussion of the other conditions
precedent to the Sale. BECAUSE APPROVAL REQUIRES THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A
MAJORITY OF THE OUTSTANDING UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST, FAILURE TO
VOTE WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE AGAINST THE SALE.
Any Limited Partner who returns his Consent signed but does not specify
"for," "against" or "abstain" will be deemed to have voted "for" the Sale.
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including time of
receipt), acceptance and withdrawal of the Consent will be determined by the
Tabulators, whose determination will be final and binding. The Tabulators
reserve the absolute right to reject any or all Consents that are not in proper
form or the acceptance of which, in the opinion of the General Partners'
counsel, would be unlawful. The Tabulators also reserve the right to waive any
irregularities or conditions of the Consent as to particular Units. Unless
waived, any irregularities in connection with the Consents must be cured within
such time as the Tabulators shall determine. The Partnership, the General
Partners and the Tabulators shall be under no duty to give notification of
defects in such Consents or shall incur liabilities for failure to give such
notification. The delivery of the Consents will not be deemed to have been made
until such irregularities have been cured or waived.
Completion Instructions
Each Limited Partner is requested to complete and execute the Consent
in accordance with the instructions contained therein. For his Consent to be
effective, each Limited Partner must deliver his Consent to the Tabulator at any
time prior to the termination of the Solicitation Period to the Partnership at
the following address:
A pre-addressed stamped envelope for return of the Consent has been
included with the Solicitation Materials. Limited Partners may also telecopy an
executed copy of this Consent to the Partnership at ______________. The Consents
will be effective only upon actual receipt by the Partnership. The method of
delivery of the Consent to the Partnership is at the election and risk of the
Limited Partner, but if such delivery is by mail it is suggested that the
mailing be made sufficiently in advance of _______ __, 1998 to permit delivery
to the Partnership on or before such date.
Withdrawal and Change of Election Rights
Consents may be withdrawn at any time prior to the expiration of the
Solicitation Period. In addition, subsequent to submission of his Consent but
prior to expiration of the Solicitation Period, a Limited Partner may change his
vote in favor of or against the Sale. For a withdrawal or change in vote to be
effective, a written or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal or change in
vote must be timely received by the Tabulator at its address set forth under
"Completion Instructions" above and must specify the name of the person having
executed the Consent to be withdrawn or vote changed and the name of the
registered holder if different from that of the person who executed the Consent.
656661.11
-35-
<PAGE>
No Dissenters Rights of Appraisal
Under the Partnership Agreement and California law, Limited Partners do
not have dissenters' rights of appraisal. If the Sale is approved by a Majority
Vote, and the other conditions to consummation of the Sale are satisfied, all
Limited Partners, both those voting in favor of the Sale and those not voting in
favor, will be entitled to receive the resulting cash distributions.
Solicitation of Consents
The General Partners and their officers, directors and employees may
assist in the solicitation of consents and in providing information to Limited
Partners in connection with any questions they may have with respect to this
Consent Solicitation Statement and the voting procedures. Such persons and
entities will be reimbursed by the Partnership for out of pocket expenses in
connection with such services. The Partnership may also engage third parties to
assist with the solicitation of Consents and pay fees and reimburse the expenses
of such persons.
YOUR CONSENT IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, AND DATE THE ENCLOSED
CONSENT AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE
PROMPTLY.
If you have any questions about the consent procedure or require
assistance, please contact:
X. IMPORTANT NOTE
It is important that Consents be returned promptly. Limited Partners
are urged to complete, sign and date the accompanying form of Consent and mail
it in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United
States, so that their vote may be recorded.
_________ ___, 1998
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENTS CORP.
By:
-----------------------------------
Bruce E. Nelson
President
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENTS ASSOCIATES II
National Partnership Investments Corp.,
its General Partner
By:
------------------------------------
Bruce E. Nelson
President
656661.11
-36-
<PAGE>
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V
9090 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
THIS CONSENT IS SOLICITED BY THE GENERAL PARTNERS
OF REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V
CONSENT OF LIMITED PARTNER
The undersigned hereby gives written notice to Real Estate Associates
Limited V (the "Partnership") that, with respect to the transaction by which the
Partnership proposes to sell all of its real estate assets to a real estate
investment trust (the "REIT") formed by affiliates of certain general partners
of the Partnership or to a subsidiary partnership of the REIT (the "Sale"), the
undersigned votes all of his, her or its units of limited partnership interest
as indicated below:
/ / For the Sale (including the Amendments).
/ / Against the Sale (including the Amendments).
/ / Abstain.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt from the General
Partners of the Consent Solicitation Statement dated
_________ __, 1998.
Dated: _____________, 199_ _______________________________
Signature
-------------------------------
Print Name
-------------------------------
Signature (if held jointly)
-------------------------------
Print Name
-------------------------------
Title
Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. When
units are held by joint tenants, both should sign.
When signing as an attorney, as executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full
title of such. If a corporation, please sign name by
President or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by
authorized person.
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM BY 5:00 P.M. (NEW YORK CITY TIME) ON ________
[__], 1998.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS CONSENT BY FACSIMILE TO
OR BY USING THE ENCLOSED PREPAID ENVELOPE TO THE ADDRESS FIRST
WRITTEN ABOVE, ATTENTION: _______________. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS,
PLEASE CALL ______________.
A LIMITED PARTNER SUBMITTING A SIGNED BUT UNMARKED CONSENT WILL BE
DEEMED TO HAVE VOTED FOR THE PARTNERSHIP'S PARTICIPATION IN THE SALE.
656661.11
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert A. Stanger & Company., Inc. 1129 Broad Street
Financial and Management Consultants Shrewsbury, NJ 07702-4314
(732) 389-3600
FAX: (732) 389-1751
(732) 544-0779
================================================================================
Annex A
FORM OF OPINION
Real Estate Associates Limited V
9090 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Gentlemen:
You have advised us that Real Estate Associates Limited V (the
"Partnership"), National Partnership Investments Corp. and National Partnership
Investments Associates V, the general partners (the "General Partners") of the
Partnership, and Casden Properties and certain of its affiliates (the
"Company"), an affiliate of the General Partners, are contemplating a
transaction in which interests in certain real estate assets listed in Exhibit 1
(the "Properties") which are owned by the Partnership through investments in
certain local limited partnerships (the "Local Partnerships") will be sold to a
newly formed real estate investment trust or its designated affiliate to be
organized by the Company [, which in turn will contribute the Property at its
cost to a newly formed real estate investment trust (the "REIT") sponsored by an
affiliate of the Company,] subject to, among other matters, the requisite
approval of the limited partners (the "Limited Partners") of the Partnership
(the "Sale").
You have further advised us that in connection with the proposed Sale,
the value ascribed to the Properties will be $____________, which value includes
amounts intended to satisfy certain potential tax liabilities of Limited
Partners (the "Valuation"). In addition, the Purchase Price associated with the
Properties will be subject to adjustments by the General Partners to reflect,
among other things, various other assets and liabilities of the Partnership and
the Local Partnerships, amounts attributable to general partner and management
interests in the Local Partnerships, and transaction expenses to determine a net
purchase price of the real estate interests (the "Real Estate Interests") to be
acquired.
[In addition, you have advised us that certain of the Properties are
subject to restrictions on the amount of cash flow which can be distributed to
investors (the "Dividend Limitation") which limit annual dividend payments, and
that the Local Partnerships do not have any accrued but unpaid distribution
balances ("Accrued Distributions") or other contractual or regulatory provisions
which would allow the Local Partnerships, and therefore the Partnership, to make
distributions in excess of the Dividend Limitation in future years.]
You have requested that Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. ("Stanger")
provide to the Partnership an opinion as to whether the Valuation ascribed to
the Properties subject, where
1
677296.1
<PAGE>
appropriate, to the Dividend Litigations in connection with determining the
purchase price to be paid for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale is fair to
the Limited Partners from a financial point of view.
In the course of our analysis for rendering this opinion, we have,
among other things:
o Reviewed a draft of the consent solicitation statement (the
"Consent") related to the Sale in a form the Partnership's
management has represented to be substantially the same as
will be distributed to the Limited Partners;
o Reviewed the Partnership's annual reports on form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the years
ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, and quarterly reports on
form IO-Q for the period ending September 30, 1997, which the
Partnership's management has indicated to be the most current
financial statements;
o Reviewed descriptive information concerning the Properties,
including location, number of units and unit mix, age,
amenities and land acreage;
o Reviewed summary historical operating statements for the
Properties for the years ended December 1, 1995 and 1996, and
the nine months ending September 30, 1997;
o Reviewed 1997 and 1998 operating budgets for the Properties
prepared by the Partnership's management;
o Discussed with management of the Partnership and the General
Partners the market conditions for the apartment properties;
conditions in the market for sales/acquisitions of properties
similar to that owned by the Partnership; historical, current
and projected operations and performance of the Properties;
the physical condition of the Properties including any
deferred maintenance; and other factors influencing value of
the Properties;
o Performed site visits of the Properties;
o Reviewed data and discussed with local sources real estate
rental market conditions in the market of each Property, and
reviewed available information relating to acquisition
criteria for income-producing properties similar to the
Properties;
o Reviewed information provided by management relating to debt
encumbering
2
677296.1
<PAGE>
the Properties and Housing Assistance Program contract
provisions pertaining to the Properties;
o Conducted such other studies, analyzes, inquiries and
investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In rendering this opinion, we have relied upon and assumed, without
independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all financial
information and management reports and data, and all other reports and
information that were provided, made available or otherwise communicated to us
by the Partnership, the Company, the General Partners and their affiliates, the
Local Partnerships or management of the Properties. We have not performed an
independent appraisal, engineering study or environmental study of the assets
and liabilities of the Partnership. We have relied upon the representations of
the Partnership, the Company, the General Partners and their affiliates, the
Local Partnerships and management of the Properties concerning, among other
things, any environmental liabilities, deferred maintenance and estimated
capital expenditure requirements, and the terms and conditions of any debt or
regulatory agreements encumbering the Properties. We have also relied upon the
assurance of the Partnership, the Company, the General Partners and their
affiliates, the Local Partnerships and the management of the Properties that any
pro forma financial statements, projections, budgets, forecasts, capital
expenditure estimates, mortgage debt and regulatory agreement summaries, value
estimates and other information contained in the Consent or otherwise provided
or communicated to us were reasonably prepared on bases consistent with actual
historical experience and reflect the best currently available estimates and
good faith judgments; that no material changes have occurred in the value of the
Properties or other information reviewed between the date such information was
provided and date of this letter; that the Partnership, the Company, the General
Partners and their affiliates, the Local Partnerships and the management of the
Properties are not aware of any information or facts that would cause the
information supplied to us to be incomplete or misleading in any material
respect; that the highest and best use of each of the Properties is as improved;
and that all calculations and projections were made in accordance with the terms
of the Partnership Agreement and regulatory agreements.
We have not been requested to, and therefore did not: (i) select the
method of determining the Valuation ascribed to the Properties in the Sale or
the purchase price to be paid for the Real Estate Interests; (ii) make any
recommendation to the Partnership or its partners with respect to whether to
approve or reject the proposed Sale; (iii) express any opinion as to (a) the tax
consequences of the proposed Sale to the Limited Partners, (b) the terms of the
Partnership Agreement or the proposed amendments to the Partnership Agreement,
or of any agreements or contracts between the Partnership, the Company and any
affiliates of the
3
677296.1
<PAGE>
General Partners, (c) the General Partners' business decision to effect the
proposed Sale, (d) the adjustments made to the Valuation ascribed to the
Properties to arrive at the purchase price to be paid for the Real Estate
Interests and the net amounts distributable to the partners, including but not
limited to, balance sheet adjustments to reflect the General Partners' estimate
of the value of current and projected net working capital balances and cash and
reserve accounts of the Partnership or the Local Partnerships and the income
therefrom, the estimated value ascribed by the General Partners to any cash flow
from the Properties in excess of the Dividend Limitation, amounts ascribed to
certain general partner and/or management interests in the Local Partnerships,
and other expenses and fees associated with the Proposed Sale, or (e)
alternatives to the proposed Sale. We are not expressing any opinion as to the
fairness of any terms of the proposed Sale other than the Valuation ascribed to
the Properties for the purpose of determining the purchase price to be paid for
the Real Estate Interests.
Our opinion is based on business, economic, real estate and capital
market, and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated as of the
date of our analysis and addresses the proposed Sale in the context of
information available as of the date of our analysis. Events occurring after
that date could affect the assumptions used in preparing the opinion.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that as of
the date of this letter the Valuation ascribed to the Properties subject, where
appropriate, to the Dividend Limitations in connection with determining the
purchase price to be paid for the Real Estate Interests in the Sale is fair to
the Limited Partners of the Partnership from a financial point of view.
Yours truly,
Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
Shrewsbury, New Jersey
___________________, 1998
4
677296.1
