<PAGE>
[LOGO OF AUTOTOTE APPEARS HERE]
1994 ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10-K
<PAGE>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION designs and manufactures computerized
wagering equipment and provides facilities management for use
in racetracks, off-track wagering, lotteries and legalized
sports betting facilities. The Company's systems are in place
in the United States, Europe, Central and South America,
Canada, Mexico and the Far East.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED: OCTOBER 31, 1994,
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
----- -----
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-13063
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE 81-0422894
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
888 SEVENTH AVENUE 10106-1894
NEW YORK, NEW YORK (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:
(212) 541-6440
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Class A Common
Stock, $.01 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K ((S)229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X
-
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant as of February 1, 1995, was approximately $165,078,541 (based on
the last sale price of such stock as reported by NASDAQ National Market
System).
EXHIBIT INDEX APPEARS ON PAGE 70
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1995, 28,926,574 SHARES OF THE REGISTRANT'S CLASS A COMMON
STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, WERE ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
Autotote Corporation ("Autotote" or the "Company") believes it is one of the
leading worldwide providers of computerized pari-mutuel wagering systems due
to its customer base and its position in the North American market and the
experience of the Company's officers in the industry. The Company believes
that it is the leading provider of pari-mutuel wagering systems in North
America, based on gross monies wagered ("handle") and the experience of the
Company's officers in the industry.
FOR INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY'S INDUSTRY SEGMENTS, SEE NOTE 21 TO NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
PARI-MUTUEL SYSTEMS
The Company's pari-mutuel customers include some of the largest North
American pari-mutuel facilities, such as Southern California Off-track
Wagering, Inc. ("SCOTWINC"), the Ontario Jockey Club ("OJC") and the New York
Racing Association ("NYRA"). Under a service contract, which generally has a
term of five years, the Company provides the pari-mutuel system, as well as
the operations, maintenance and supervisory personnel necessary to operate the
system, while the mutuel clerks who issue tickets on the Company's teller-
operated terminals to patrons of the facility are employed by the facility.
Under the service contracts, the Company retains ownership of the equipment.
Additional software and other support functions are provided by the Company.
Revenues received by the Company from the operation of its pari-mutuel
wagering systems are generally based upon a percentage of the handle, subject
in many instances to minimum fees which are usually exceeded under normal
operating conditions. Minimum fees under the Company's service contracts are
generally based on the number of days the facility operates, as well as other
factors, including the type of system and number of terminals installed at the
facility and the reliability of the predicted number of racing days to occur
during the term of the contract. The Company's larger contracts generally do
not provide for minimum payments.
In its service contracts, the Company makes certain warranties which may
cover one or more of the following requirements: (i) that the wagering system
operate in accordance with certain specifications, pass certain acceptance
tests, and be installed and operational by a certain date, (ii) that the
Company maintain the system in good, accurate and efficient operating
condition, (iii) that the Company keep a certain level of spare equipment on
hand, (iv) that the system not cease to be operational for more than a
specified number of races or period of time, and (v) that counterfeit tickets
not be accepted and processed. Upon a breach of such warranties, the Company
generally is responsible for liquidated damages, which may be substantial,
subject in some cases to a maximum daily and/or annual amount. These
provisions present ongoing potential for substantial expense. The Company
maintains insurance against certain losses arising out of breaches of
warranties and damages payable pursuant to such contract damages clauses, with
a deductible of $50,000 per error and a coverage limit of $11,000,000.
Although the Company believes that these levels of insurance are adequate for
its needs, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue
to obtain such insurance on reasonable terms or at all or that such insurance
will be sufficient to protect the Company against material loss.
NETWORKS
As part of its strategy to enable its pari-mutuel customers to increase
handle by offering additional wagering opportunities to the public, the
Company has created regional networks which transmit wagering data between
2
<PAGE>
tracks, off-track betting ("OTB") facilities and casinos. The Company has
established networks in California, Florida, Illinois, Ontario, Alberta,
Puerto Rico, Mexico and Pennsylvania, and has also developed national
networks, one linking 23 Nevada casinos with 20 racetracks throughout the
country, another linking nine out of the twelve casinos in Atlantic City, New
Jersey with racetracks in other locations, and another linking 20 American
racetracks to 30 OTB's in Mexico.
SIMULCASTING
The Company believes that simulcasting live racing is a significant avenue
for growth in the racing industry. Simulcasting is the process of transmitting
the audio and video signal of a live racing performance from a track to a
satellite for retransmission to wagering locations around the country.
Simulcasting provides racetracks the opportunity to increase revenues by
receiving transmissions from other racetracks and sending their signals to as
many wagering locations as possible. In its simulcasting operations, the
Company receives a per transmission fixed fee and normally receives an
additional monthly fixed fee for decoders.
The Company recently acquired Marvin H. Sugarman Productions, Inc. and
Racing Technology, Inc. (collectively "Autotote Communication Services,
Inc."), a sports simulcasting company. The Company believes that Autotote
Communication Services, Inc. is a leading simulcaster of live horse and
greyhound racing events to OTB patrons in North America. Autotote
Communications Services, Inc. currently simulcasts races from racetracks to
numerous OTB sites and racetracks throughout the United States and the
Caribbean. Autotote Communications Services, Inc. plans to use a digital
compression system to simulcast racing events to over 700 OTB sites. The
Company believes that this new technology will further implement its pari-
mutuel strategy in North America by enabling it to launch new interactive and
transactional channels on an expanded network.
On January 19, 1995, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of
the Simulcast Division of LDDS Corporation (formerly IDB Communications Group,
Inc.) ("IDB") for a purchase price of $9 million in cash. The Company also
acquired the rights and obligations under leases relating to eight C-band
satellite transponders on the Hughes Communications Galaxy-VI Satellite for
$4.5 million in cash. The acquisition of IDB furthers the Company's strategy
with respect to its North American simulcasting business.
VIDEO GAMING
The Company's latest wagering terminal, the PROBE XLC, functions in video
gaming applications such as keno, video poker and other games. The Company
believes video gaming machines ("VGMs") are more likely to be approved for
operation at racetracks than at other locations, since racetracks already
provide a form of wagering and are subject to an existing regulatory
structure. Accordingly, the Company believes that it is well positioned to
participate in the VGM market if the trend of legalizing VGMs continues. In
fiscal 1994, the Company installed an aggregate of 700 PROBE XLC terminals,
communications equipment and related equipment at two racetracks in West
Virginia, for which it is compensated based on a percentage of handle less
winnings ("drop"). The West Virginia contracts require the Company to pay
liquidated damages of no more than an aggregate of $350,000 for a 12 month
period in the event of a system failure. The Company also entered into a
contract in April 1994 to supply VGMs in Mexico.
SPORTS WAGERING
The Company provides sports wagering systems to 100 out of 105 facilities in
Nevada and at the leading operator of sports wagering facilities in Mexico.
Casinos and other sports wagering facilities generally purchase the
computerized wagering system from the Company and enter into an agreement with
the Company for repair and maintenance of the system and software support.
Sports wagering equipment sales revenue is reflected in wagering equipment
sales revenues and revenues from maintenance contracts are included in
operating revenues from wagering systems contracts. Under purchase agreements,
the Company sells its sports wagering system to the facility and provides
training for the system operators and sell/cash terminal clerks. The Company
does not provide the operations and supervisory personnel necessary to operate
the system as it does with pari-mutuel wagering systems under service
contracts.
3
<PAGE>
The Nevada Gaming Commission recently promulgated regulations for a pari-
mutuel form of sports wagering for Nevada casinos subject to review in 1995.
In 1994, the Company signed a joint venture agreement with International Game
Technology--North ("IGT"), a subsidiary of International Game Technology, for
the purpose of developing and marketing a pari-mutuel sports system, to be
known as MEGASPORTS(R). The Company expects that MEGASPORTS(R) will offer
opportunities to wager on the outcome of individual sports contests, events
occurring within or during the contests, and outcomes of groups of sports
contests. The MEGASPORTS(R) pari-mutuel wagering system is currently
anticipated to consist of a central computer, communications equipment and
terminals. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, the computer
system software and hardware for MEGASPORTS(R) is to be provided by the
Company. The Company's existing terminals installed at Nevada sports wagering
facilities are expected to be modified to create dual port terminals allowing
pari-mutuel sports wagering. In accordance with the joint venture agreement,
marketing will be the responsibility of IGT. The joint venture agreement is
subject to the approval of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board and Nevada
Gaming Commission, and the sports wagering system must be licensed by the
Nevada gaming authorities. There can be no assurance that the Company will
qualify under the new regulations or that the required license will be issued
to the Company.
INTERNATIONAL PARI-MUTUEL OPERATIONS
Internationally, the Company generally sells, delivers and installs pari-
mutuel wagering systems rather than operating them pursuant to service
contracts. The Company generally designs a customized system to meet the
unique needs of each customer, including game designs, language preferences,
network communications standards and other key elements. The Company also
provides the purchaser with a royalty-free license for use of the Company's
proprietary system software, as well as technical assistance, support,
accessories and spare parts. The Company's personnel participate in the
installation and then train the customer's personnel. In addition to terminal
and equipment sales in a total of 20 countries, the Company has installed
central "hub" systems in Denmark, Finland, Korea, Chile, Venezuela, Panama,
Argentina, Germany and Mexico.
In its international sales contracts, the Company makes certain warranties
and may provide performance bonds regarding the operation and reliability of
its pari-mutuel wagering systems. In the case of such international contracts,
liquidated damages may be payable by the Company in the event of late
deliveries and/or a portion of the purchase price may be retained to secure
the Company's performance. The Company maintains insurance against losses
arising out of breach of warranty and payable pursuant to such contract
damages clauses with a deductible of $50,000 per error with a coverage limit
of $11,000,000. The Company has not paid liquidated damages in connection with
its international sales.
The Company's acquisition of ETAG Electronic Totalisator AG and its
affiliates (collectively, the "ETAG Group") in fiscal 1993 has increased the
Company's participation in the international pari-mutuel market through the
provision of wagering equipment and services. The ETAG Group provides pari-
mutuel wagering systems and certain linked services to approximately 35
racetracks in Germany and Austria, including all of the harness racetracks in
such countries. A 50%-owned ETAG Group affiliate operates four OTB parlors in
Germany under service contracts.
On November 1, 1994, the Company acquired 80% of the capital stock of the
holding company of SEPMO S.A., ("SEPMO"), a French supplier of wagering
systems and services to the French off-track betting network and other
customers, for approximately $2.3 million. The remaining 20% of the stock of
SEPMO is scheduled to be purchased in four equal installments over a period of
four years at a purchase price to be determined by a formula based on the
results of operations of SEPMO on a consolidated basis, subject to certain
maximum and minimum units. SEPMO currently provides wagering systems to
approximately 60 racetracks and 400 terminals at 100 OTB locations throughout
France. SEPMO also provides wagering systems to customers in the Middle East
and North Africa. Currently, certain officers of SEPMO retain the remaining
20% of the stock of SEPMO's parent company.
In December 1994, the Company entered into a preliminary agreement to
acquire an 88% interest in certain gaming and information technology assets of
Elettronica Ingegneria Sistemi S.p.A. ("EIS"), for $9.7 million in
4
<PAGE>
cash, $1.5 million in promissory notes, shares of the Company's Class A Common
Stock valued at $1.4 million, and assumption of certain loan obligations of
EIS. EIS, to which the Company had sales of approximately $27.3 million in
fiscal 1994, is an Italian company which designs and develops integrated
computer and communications networks and software for pari-mutuel and lottery
applications. The acquisition is subject to approval by the Italian government
and satisfaction of other conditions. The Company expects to finance this
acquisition with the proceeds of a future financing. While the Company expects
the acquisition to close in early May, 1995, there can be no assurance that it
will do so at that time or at all.
OPERATION OF OFF-TRACK BETTING ESTABLISHMENTS
Through its Autotote Enterprises, Inc. subsidiary, the Company holds the
exclusive right to operate the Connecticut off-track betting system (the
"Connecticut OTB"). The Company currently operates 11 OTB locations statewide
including teletheaters in New Haven and Windsor Locks, Connecticut. In 1994
the Company commenced the opening of two new branches and the renovation of a
New Haven sports entertainment complex which will feature simulcasting, dining
facilities, a sports bar, and other services. The Company has implemented
several important product and service enhancements to the Connecticut OTB,
including expanded simulcasting of races from tracks across the country;
common pool wagering; a new, Company-produced weekly television program
featuring live race events with commentary; and expanded telephone account
betting.
The operation of the Connecticut OTB subjects the Company to a pari-mutuel
tax of 3 1/2% of all monies wagered and requires the Company to pay liquidated
damages in the event that certain performance standards are not met. The
percentage of total handle which the Company may receive as the operating
revenues from the Connecticut OTB is determined by law and ranges from 17% to
25%, depending on the type of wagers for events occurring in the State of
Connecticut, and varies with respect to events which occur in other states.
Handle wagered on tracks from a remote location can increase incremental
revenue to the racetrack owners. The Company believes its success in managing
the privatization of the Connecticut OTB system may provide additional
privatization opportunities in other states.
LOTTERY SYSTEMS
Through its subsidiary Autotote Lottery Corporation ("Autotote Lottery"),
the Company operates the Connecticut State Lottery, providing all equipment,
personnel and services necessary to operate the lottery network while
retaining title to the equipment. Autotote Lottery also provides services to
the Massachusetts State Lottery under a technical support contract which
expires in June 1995, as well as equipment and services to Loto Quebec and the
Israeli national lottery. The Company is in the process of installing its
latest generation lottery system, utilizing the high speed PROBE *L terminal
and its UNIX-based Aegis central system which features open systems
architecture and symmetrical multiprocessors, at the Connecticut State
Lottery. The Company's contract for the Connecticut State Lottery expires in
1998.
During 1992, a foreign subsidiary of the Company entered into an agreement
to provide up to 10,000 terminals to automate Italy's TOTIP pool, a nationwide
lottery based on horse racing. During fiscal 1993, the Company delivered the
initial 300 terminals, was awarded the entire contract amount, and received an
order to supply an additional 3,000 terminals to the TOTIP pool. The Company
delivered the remaining terminals during fiscal 1994.
Additionally, the Company's subsidiary Tele Control Beteiligungs-
Gesellschaft GmbH and its affiliates (collectively, the "Tele Control Group"),
acquired in fiscal 1993 and based in Vienna, Austria, develops high volume
transaction processing programs principally for on-line lotteries and other
wagering applications and, to a lesser extent, for banking and credit card
applications, and provides related software support. It has installed lottery
systems in Austria, Switzerland and The Netherlands and is supplying the
lottery central system hardware and software to five German states. The
Company is negotiating to operate the central systems of certain of the German
lotteries. The Tele Control Group's technology includes "open system"
features, with central systems and software capable of operating with
terminals and components from other suppliers. The Tele Control Group
5
<PAGE>
has also developed a proprietary integrated computer system which can execute
a wide variety of wagering applications including pari-mutuel wagering and
lottery and video games such as keno. The Tele Control Group employs
approximately 105 persons. The Tele Control Group's UNIBET software system
integrates on-track, off-track, lottery, telephone betting and video game
applications. BETNET is the proprietary network of the Tele Control Group for
the UNIBET system.
MARKETING
The Company directs its marketing to horse and greyhound racetracks, jai
alai frontons, and OTB and sports wagering facilities with respect to pari-
mutuel contracts, state and national governments with respect to lottery
contracts and end users with respect to the Connecticut OTB. In New York
State, off-track betting is conducted by regional or statewide government off-
track wagering authorities. Bidding by the Company for lottery contracts and
for New York pari-mutuel contracts is therefore subject to applicable public
bidding laws and attendant risks of delays, challenges to contract awards and
resulting litigation.
Contract awards often involve a lengthy competitive bid process, running
from specification development to contract negotiation and award. Contracts
have a high dollar value and are technically and commercially complex and may
require substantial initial cash outlays. Start up costs associated with
contract awards typically involve expenditures for items such as software
development/customization, assembly of wagering systems, and installation
costs including electrical and carpentry work, transportation and placement of
equipment, and system implementation. Such costs are primarily comprised of
labor related expenses due to the relative magnitude of software development
and customization in the start up phase.
In the United States, lottery authorities generally commence the contract
award process by issuing a request for proposals inviting bids and proposals
from various lottery vendors. The request for proposals usually indicates
certain requirements specific to the jurisdiction, such as particular games
which will be required, particular pricing mechanisms, the experience required
of the vendor and the amount of any performance bonds that must be furnished.
After the bids have been evaluated and a particular vendor's bid has been
accepted, the lottery authority and the vendor generally negotiate a contract
in more detailed terms. Once the contract has been finalized, the vendor
begins to install the lottery system. After the expiration of the initial
contract term and all extensions thereof, a lottery authority in the United
States may either negotiate further extensions or commence a new competitive
bidding process. Some states require, as a condition of bidding for a lottery
contract, that a prospective bidder's wagering system be operating in another
state. The Company is in the process of installing its latest generation
lottery system in Connecticut.
Internationally, certain lottery authorities utilize a formal bidding
process, while others negotiate proposals with one or more potential vendors.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be the successful bidder for
any of these contracts.
COMPANY PRODUCTS
Pari-mutuel wagering systems used by racetrack facilities typically have
three central processing units and a significant number of ticket issuing
terminals. The type of central processing unit and the number of ticket
issuing terminals used in a system are generally determined by the amount of
wagering at, and physical layout of, the facility. Pari-mutuel wagering
systems used by inter-track and off-track betting facilities typically include
ticket issuing terminals installed at several different racetracks or off-
track facilities, respectively, and the central processing system which
communicates with the wagering systems at the on-track locations via telephone
or data communication lines. Sports wagering systems typically have two
central processing units, peripherals, and ticket issuing terminals. The
Company has designed customized software for the sports wagering industry
which can be tailored for individual customer management information and other
requirements. Prices for the Company's products vary among contracts and
customers as a result of negotiations between the Company and its customers
and the custom features selected by the customers. The Company also designs,
provides and supports the proprietary applications software for its pari-
mutuel systems.
6
<PAGE>
The Company's domestic lottery products consist primarily of central
processing systems, including data communication networks, and on-line/off-
line lottery terminals. The lottery management system portion of the product
includes a client-server database. Lottery terminals are generally on-line to
the central system via telephone lines connected to the system's
communications front end processor.
SERVICE AND SUPPORT
The Company's staff of approximately 450 trained maintenance and field
service personnel supports the operation of the Company's systems and
communications networks. These personnel include regional and national
managers which support the Company's systems by performing routine system
maintenance and repairs of systems and equipment when needed.
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The Company believes that its ability to attract new wagering system
customers and retain existing customers depends in part on its ability to
continue to incorporate technological advances into and to improve its product
lines. The Company maintains a development program directed toward systems
development as well as toward the improvement and refinement of its present
products and the expansion of their uses and applications. The Company employs
approximately 160 people in connection with software, engineering and product
development.
Product development expenditures in fiscal 1994 were $10.3 million, up from
$5.6 million in fiscal 1993, reflecting increases in new product development,
product enhancement and product support. Approximately $3.6 million of the
fiscal 1994 development expenditures are included in the statement of
operations, approximately $6.0 million was capitalized with respect to
development of lottery and video lottery systems and $700,000 was reimbursed
by customers. Approximately $1.0 million of fiscal 1993 development expense is
included in the statement of operations, approximately $600,000 was directly
allocated to projects, and $1.6 million was reimbursed by customers. $2.4
million relating to development of the MAX 6000 terminals and lottery systems
was capitalized in fiscal 1993.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The Company maintains patent protection on two of its wagering products and
four of its lottery products and has a number of registered trademarks in the
United States and in Europe and other common law trademark rights for certain
of its products. The software and control systems for the Company's wagering
systems are also protected by copyright and trade secret laws. The Company
does not believe that patent protection is a vital competitive factor in the
computerized wagering market but believes that other factors, such as those
discussed in "Competition" below, are more important to the success of the
Company.
PRODUCTION PROCESSES; SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF COMPONENTS
Production of the Company's wagering systems and component products
primarily involves the assembly of electronic components into more complex
systems and products, generally through contracts with third parties. The
Company has recently closed down and disposed of its Newark, Delaware
manufacturing facility. The Company expects that at the end of the first
calendar quarter of 1995, the production of certain product lines will be
discontinued, and all other manufacturing will be relocated either to the
Company's manufacturing facility in Ballymahon, Ireland, or as appropriate, to
North American subcontractors.
The Company normally has sufficient lead time between reaching an agreement
to service a wagering facility and commencing actual operations at such
facility. In the event the current suppliers of central processing units were
no longer available, the Company believes that it would be able to adapt its
application software to hardware available from other sources within a time
frame sufficient to allow it to meet new contractual obligations, although the
price competitiveness of the Company's products might diminish. The lead time
for obtaining most of the electronic components used by the Company is
approximately 120 days. The Company believes that this is consistent with its
competitors' lead times and is also consistent with the needs of its
customers.
7
<PAGE>
BACKLOG
The backlog of the Company's orders for sales of its products believed to be
firm was approximately $11.0 million as of October 31, 1994, compared to
approximately $24.9 million as of October 31, 1993. The decrease primarily
reflects completion of TOTIP deliveries. Approximately 90% of the backlog as
of October 31, 1994, is expected to be filled in fiscal 1995. Backlog at
October 31, 1994, does not include revenues attributable to multi-year
wagering systems contracts, a multi-year lottery service contract, revenues
attributable to the operation of the Connecticut OTB, or maintenance
contracts.
COMPETITION
The Company competes primarily on the basis of product design, performance,
reliability, pricing, and customer service. The Company competes with several
pari-mutuel wagering system companies in North America. Certain of those
companies are significantly larger in terms of assets, revenues and net worth.
The Company's principal competitor in the pari-mutuel business is Video
Lottery Technologies, Inc. ("VLT") which operates its pari-mutuel business
through its subsidiary United Wagering Systems, Inc. VLT has also announced
the formation of a ten year strategic technology partnership with Electronic
Data Systems Corp., ("EDS"), which owns a minority equity position in VLT.
Another competitor in the pari-mutuel business is GTECH Holdings Corporation
("GTECH"), which operates its pari-mutuel business through its subsidiary
AmTote International, Inc. ("AmTote"). The Company also competes with
International Totalisator Systems, Inc. and other smaller pari-mutuel
companies. Both GTECH and EDS, which owns a minority equity position in VLT,
have substantially greater resources than the Company. Both GTECH and VLT
offer video gaming terminals to the pari-mutuel wagering industry. Other video
gaming terminal suppliers include International Game Technology, WMS
Industries Inc., Bally Gaming International, Inc. and several smaller
companies.
Competition outside of North America is more fragmented, with competition
being provided by several international and regional companies. No single
company maintains the leading market position internationally, although
certain companies possess regional strengths. Likewise, competition among
providers of sports wagering systems is, for the most part, between smaller
regional companies. Additionally, some casinos have designed their own sports
wagering systems.
The on-line lottery business is highly competitive. State and foreign
governments normally award contracts based on rigorous competitive bidding
procedures. In the vendor evaluation process, price is important but usually
not the sole or necessarily the most important criterion for selection. Other
significant factors which influence the award of lottery contracts include the
ability to optimize lottery revenues through marketing capability and
applications knowledge; the quality, dependability and upgrade capability of
the network; the experience, financial condition and reputation of the vendor;
and the satisfaction of other requirements and qualifications which the
lottery authority may impose. The Company's major competitors in the on-line
lottery business include GTECH, VLT, Essnet AB, and several other companies.
Competition in the simulcasting business in North America is fragmented.
REGULATION
General
Pari-mutuel wagering, sports wagering, video gaming and on-line lotteries
may operate in jurisdictions that have enacted enabling legislation. In
jurisdictions which currently permit various wagering activities, regulation
is extensive and evolving. The Company believes that it is in substantial
compliance with all current regulatory requirements in the jurisdictions where
it operates.
Pari-Mutuel Wagering
More than 40 states, all of the Canadian provinces and many foreign
countries have authorized pari-mutuel wagering on horse and dog races. Puerto
Rico and several states, including Connecticut, Rhode Island and Florida, also
allow pari-mutuel betting on jai alai matches.
8
<PAGE>
Companies which manufacture, distribute and operate pari-mutuel wagering
systems in these jurisdictions are subject to the regulations of the
applicable regulatory authorities there. These authorities generally require
the Company, as well as its directors, officers, certain employees and holders
of five per cent or more of the Company's common stock, to obtain various
licenses, permits and approvals. Regulatory authorities may also conduct
background investigations of the Company and its key personnel and
stockholders in order to insure the integrity of the wagering system. These
authorities have the power to refuse, revoke or restrict a license for any
cause they deem reasonable. The loss of a license in one jurisdiction may
cause a Company's licensing status to come under review in other jurisdictions
as well.
The New Jersey Casino Control Act comprehensively governs all aspects of
casino gaming in New Jersey. The New Jersey Act was amended in 1992 to permit
racetrack simulcast wagering. In May 1993, the Company applied for a casino
service industry license pursuant to the New Jersey Act to provide equipment
and services to casinos in Atlantic City to create the Atlantic City simulcast
network, which links nine casinos with multiple racetracks. The license was
granted in December 1994.
The Company's rights to operate the Connecticut OTB system shall continue as
long as the Company and Autotote Enterprises, Inc. ("AEI"), the Company's
wholly-owned Connecticut subsidiary, hold all licenses required for the
operation of the system. In addition, the officers and directors of both
companies and certain personnel of AEI must be licensed. Licensees are
generally required to submit to background investigations and provide required
disclosures. The Division of Special Revenue of the State of Connecticut (the
"Division") may revoke the license to operate the system under certain
circumstances, including a false statement in the licensing disclosure
materials, a transfer of ownership of the licensed entity without Division
approval and failure to meet financial obligations. The Company has also
agreed to comply with regulations proposed by the Division which regulate
certain aspects of the system's operation. The approval of the Connecticut
regulatory authorities is required before any off-track betting facility is
closed or relocated or any new branch or simulcast facility is established.
Sports Wagering
Sports wagering is currently authorized in numerous foreign countries,
including Mexico and Canada. The state of Nevada also permits sports wagering
in casinos. In addition, the state of Oregon currently sponsors a lottery
based on the outcome of sporting events; Montana authorizes betting on fantasy
sports leagues; and North Dakota permits certain sports wagering pools.
The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (the "Act") prohibits
states from sponsoring, operating, advertising, promoting, licensing or
authorizing sports betting on professional or amateur athletic games, subject
to several exceptions. The Act does not terminate state-authorized sports
betting schemes which were already in operation prior to October 1991, such as
those in Nevada, or which existed between January 1, 1976 and August 31, 1990.
The Act is also inapplicable to pari-mutuel betting on horse and dog racing
and jai alai.
Companies which manufacture, sell or distribute sports wagering equipment
are also subject to the various laws and regulations of the countries and
states which permit sports wagering. These rules primarily concern the
responsibility, financial stability and character of the sports wagering
equipment companies, as well as the individuals financially interested or
involved in the gaming operations. The rules generally resemble the
regulations which govern the pari-mutuel wagering industry. Companies and
individuals are required to be licensed before they may manufacture,
distribute, own or operate sports wagering equipment; they are subject to
background investigations designed to protect the integrity of the gaming
industry; they may have their licenses denied, revoked or restricted for any
cause deemed reasonable; and the loss of their license in one jurisdiction
could adversely affect their licensing status in other jurisdictions.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with all
regulations now governing sports wagering in the United States and the various
foreign countries where the Company is active. There can be no assurance that
subsequent regulations will not be burdensome to the Company, its personnel or
its stockholders.
9
<PAGE>
The Company has filed an application in Nevada to be registered as a
publicly traded corporation and as a holding company for its wholly-owned
Nevada subsidiary Autotote CBS, Inc. ("ACBS"). ACBS has also filed appropriate
applications in Nevada to be licensed and/or found suitable (i) as a holding
company for MEGASPORTS(R), a joint venture with IGT; (ii) as a systems
operator through MEGASPORTS(R) for pari-mutuel sports wagering; (iii) as an
operator of slot machines through ACBS; (iv) as a manufacturer and
distributor; and (v) as a systems operator for pari-mutuel wagering. Finally,
appropriate applications have been filed in Nevada for officers and directors
of ACBS and the Company. These applications are currently being reviewed by
the appropriate Nevada authority.
The Nevada Gaming Commission (the "Nevada Commission") has approved a
regulation which authorizes pari-mutuel sports wagering in Nevada. The
regulation contains a sunset provision whereby the regulation will expire in
April 1995 without specific reenactment by the Nevada Commission. There can be
no assurance that the regulation will not be burdensome to the Company, its
personnel or its stockholders, or that the Company will obtain such business.
As part of the joint venture with IGT, the Company plans to develop a pari-
mutuel based sports wagering program, to be known as MEGASPORTS(R). The joint
venture project must be licensed by the Nevada Commission. As part of the
licensing and investigation process described above, the joint venture
agreement must receive approval. Additionally, the sports wagering system must
receive approval as associated equipment. The following regulatory
requirements will apply to the Company in connection with the applications
filed for MEGASPORTS(R) as well as the additional licenses and findings of
suitability requested by the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary.
The ownership and operation of gaming facilities, including pari-mutuel
sports wagering facilities and the manufacture and distribution of gaming
devices, including video gaming, in Nevada are subject to extensive state and
local regulation. The Company's proposed operation would be subject to the
licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Commission, the Nevada State
Gaming Control Board (the "Nevada Board") and various local boards and
commissions (hereinafter the "Nevada Gaming Authorities"). In general, the
statutes and regulations of the Nevada Gaming Authorities seek to (i) prevent
unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement
with gaming at any time or in any capacity, (ii) establish and maintain
responsible accounting practices and procedures, (iii) maintain effective
control over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing
minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets
and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of
periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities, (iv) prevent cheating and
fraudulent practices, and (v) provide a source of state and local revenues
through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in such laws, regulations and
procedures could have an adverse effect on the Company's proposed activity
relating to the MEGASPORTS(R) joint venture or any other gaming application
for which the Company has applied for licensure.
Any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that would operate the joint
venture would be required to be licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The
gaming license requires periodic payment of fees and taxes, is not
transferable and must be renewed periodically. Additionally, the Company is
required to be registered as a publicly traded corporation by the Nevada
Commission and as such, would be required periodically to submit detailed
financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and furnish any other
information which the Nevada Commission may require. No person may become a
stockholder of, or receive any percentage of profits from, the wholly-owned
subsidiary without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada
Gaming Authorities. The Company and the wholly-owned subsidiary would be
required to obtain various approvals, permits and licenses from the Nevada
Gaming Authorities prior to engaging in the joint venture.
The Nevada Commission may also require the holder of any equity or debt
security of a corporation registered under the Nevada Gaming Control Act to
file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own the equity or
debt security of a registered corporation. If the Nevada Commission determines
that a person is unsuitable to own such equity or debt security, then pursuant
to the regulations of the Nevada Commission, the registered corporation can be
sanctioned, including the loss of its approvals, if without the prior approval
of the Nevada Commission, it (i) pays to the unsuitable person any dividend,
interest, or any distribution whatsoever
10
<PAGE>
on such security, (ii) recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person
in connection with such securities, (iii) pays the unsuitable person
remuneration in any form, or (iv) makes any payment to the unsuitable person
by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar
transaction in connection with such security.
Officers, directors and certain key employees of the Company and any wholly-
owned subsidiary holding a gaming license are or may be required to be found
suitable or licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities, and employees
associated with gaming, including pari-mutuel wagering and manufacturing of
gaming devices must obtain work permits which are subject to immediate
suspension and possible revocation under certain statutorily defined
circumstances. In addition, anyone having a material relationship or
involvement with the Company may be required to be found suitable or licensed,
in which case those persons would be required to pay the costs and fees of the
Nevada Board in connection with the investigation. An application for
licensure may be denied for any cause deemed reasonable by the issuing agency.
A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require
submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a
thorough investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the
issuing agency. In addition to their authority to deny an application for a
license, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a
change in corporate position. Further, Nevada Gaming Authorities have the
authority to require the wholly-owned subsidiary holding the gaming license to
suspend or dismiss officers, directors or other key employees, or sever
relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications
or whom the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities.
Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not
subject to review in Nevada.
The Company and any wholly-owned subsidiary holding a gaming license would
be required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada
authorities. Substantially all loans, leases, sales of securities and similar
financing transactions by the wholly-owned subsidiary holding the gaming
license must be approved by and reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities.
If it were determined that gaming laws or regulations had been violated by
the Company or the wholly-owned subsidiary holding the gaming license, the
licensees of the Company or of the wholly-owned subsidiary holding the gaming
license may have its license revoked, limited, suspended, or conditioned, and
the wholly-owned subsidiary holding the gaming license, the Company and the
persons involved could, at the discretion of the Nevada Gaming Commission, be
subject to substantial administrative fines for each separate determined
violation.
In addition, a supervisor could be appointed by the Nevada Commission to
operate the Company's gaming properties and, under certain circumstances,
earnings generated during the supervisor's appointment (except for the
reasonable rental value of the Company's gaming properties) could be forfeited
to the State of Nevada. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming
license or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming
license would) materially adversely affect the Company's gaming operations.
The Nevada Gaming Authorities have the power to investigate at any time any
record or beneficial stockholder of the Company. Nevada law requires any
person who acquires more than 5.0% of the Company's voting securities to
report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission and such person may be
required to be found suitable. Also, any person who becomes a beneficial owner
of more than 10.0% of the Company's voting securities must apply for a finding
of suitability by the Nevada Commission within thirty (30) days after the
chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing
and must pay the costs and fees incurred by the Nevada Board in connection
with the investigation. If the stockholder who must be found suitable is a
corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and
financial information including a list of beneficial owners. The regulations
of the Nevada Commission provide for the granting of a waiver of these
suitability requirements for institutional investors, as that term is defined
by regulation, who acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% but not
more than 15.0% of the voting securities of a registered publicly traded
corporation for investment purposes only. In order to qualify for such a
waiver, an institutional investor must meet certain requirements and the
burden to demonstrate qualification for the waiver is at all times on the
11
<PAGE>
applicant. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting
securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired
and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor
and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a
majority of the members of the board of directors of the Company, any change
in the Company's corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations
of the Company, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the
Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the Company's voting
securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be
inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes only
include: (i) voting on all matters voted on by stockholders; (ii) making
financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by
securities analysts for informational purposes only and not to cause a change
in its management, policies or operations; and (iii) such other activities as
the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment
intent. If a beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable
is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed financial and
business information including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is
required to pay all costs of investigation. A granting of such a waiver does
not include a waiver or exemption from the requirement for prior approval to
"acquire control" of a registered corporation.
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a
license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission
or the Chairman of the Nevada Board, may be found unsuitable. The same
restrictions apply to a beneficial owner if the record owner, after request,
fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any stockholder found unsuitable and
who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the Class A
Common Stock beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada
Commission may be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. The Company would be subject
to disciplinary action if, after it receives notice that a person is
unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with the
Company or the wholly owned subsidiary holding a gaming license, the Company
(i) pays that person any dividend or interest upon voting securities of the
Company, (ii) allows that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any
voting right conferred through securities held by that person, or (iii) gives
remuneration in any form to that person. If a security holder is found
unsuitable, the Company may itself be found unsuitable if it fails to pursue
all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting
securities for cash at fair market value. Additionally, the Clark County
Commission has taken the position that it has the authority to approve all
persons owning or controlling the stock of any corporation controlling a
gaming license.
The Company would be required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada
which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any
securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder
may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada
Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for
finding the record holder unsuitable. The Company would also be required to
render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner.
The Nevada Commission has the power at any time to require the Company's stock
certificates to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to
the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulation of the Nevada Commission.
Although, to date, the Nevada Commission has not imposed such a requirement on
the Company, there can be no assurance that it will not do so at some later
date.
As an applicant, the Company may not make a public offering of its
securities without the approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or
proceeds therefrom were intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance
gaming facilities in Nevada, or retire or extend obligations incurred for such
purposes. Such approval, if given, would not constitute a recommendation or
approval by the Nevada Commission or Board as to the accuracy or adequacy of
the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities. Any representation
to the contrary is unlawful.
Changes in control of the Company through merger, consolidation, acquisition
of assets, management or consulting agreements or any form of takeover could
not occur without the prior investigation of the Nevada Board and approval of
the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a registered
corporation must satisfy the Nevada Board and Commission in a variety of
stringent standards prior to assuming control of
12
<PAGE>
the registered corporation. The Nevada Commission may require controlling
stockholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material
relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control, to
be investigated and to be licensed as part of the approval process related to
the transaction.
The Nevada legislature has declared that certain corporate acquisitions
which are opposed by management through repurchases of voting securities and
other corporate defense tactics that affect corporate gaming licensees in
Nevada, and corporations publicly-traded stock that are affiliated with those
operations, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The
Nevada Commission has therefore established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate
the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada's
gaming industry and to further Nevada's policy to (i) assure the financial
stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates; (ii) preserve
the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (iii)
promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs.
Approvals would be, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada
Commission before the Company could make exceptional repurchases of voting
securities above the current market price thereof (commonly referred to as
"greenmail") and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be
consummated. Nevada's gaming regulations also require prior approval by the
Nevada Commission if the Company were to adopt a plan of recapitalization
proposed by the Company's Board of Directors in opposition to a tender offer
made directly to its stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control of the
Company.
Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to
be registered, or is under common control of such persons (a "Licensee"), and
who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada is
required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a
revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation
by the Nevada Board of such Licensee's participation in foreign gaming. The
revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease in the discretion of the
Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain
reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Gaming Control Act. A Licensee is
also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if it knowingly
violates any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming
operations, fails to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with
the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations,
engages in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability
to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employs a person in the foreign operation
who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the
grounds of personal unsuitability.
License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of
gaming activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada and to the
counties and cities in which the Nevada Licensee's respective operations are
conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and
taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually and are based upon
either: (i) a percentage of the gross revenues received; (ii) the number of
gaming devices operated; or (iii) the number of table games operated. A casino
entertainment tax is also paid by casino operations where entertainment is
furnished in connection with the selling of food or refreshments. Nevada
Licensees that hold a license as a operator of a slot route, or a
manufacturer's or distributor's license, also pay certain fees and taxes to
the State of Nevada.
Video Gaming
Video gaming is one of the newest innovations in the wagering industry.
Seven states (Louisiana, Montana, Oregon, Rhode Island, Delaware, South Dakota
and West Virginia), several Canadian provinces and various foreign countries
have already authorized a type of video gaming often called video lottery.
Unlike the VGMs used in the Nevada and New Jersey casinos, VGMs for video
lottery dispense vouchers redeemable for cash, rather than cash itself.
Although some states, such as Rhode Island and West Virginia, currently
restrict VGMs to already existing wagering facilities, most states that allow
video gaming permit VGMs to be placed at bars and restaurants, as well as
racetracks.
Government officials in at least 20 additional states, including New York,
New Jersey and Minnesota, are now considering proposals to legalize video
gaming in their states. Legislatures have been enthusiastic about the
13
<PAGE>
potential of video gaming to raise significant non-tax revenues. Some
officials, however, have expressed a desire to limit video gaming to
established wagering facilities if video gaming is authorized in their
jurisdiction at all.
Federal regulations also govern the video gaming industry. The Federal
Gambling Devices Act of 1962 (the "Devices Act") makes it unlawful for any
person to manufacture, deliver or receive gaming machines, such as VGMs,
across interstate lines unless that person has first registered with the
Attorney General of the United States. The Devices Act does not apply to
machines designed for pari-mutuel betting at a racetrack, such as the
Company's wagering terminal. The Devices Act also permits states to exempt
themselves from its coverage, and at least one state, Nevada, has done so. The
Company has registered under the Devices Act and believes that it is in
compliance with all of the Devices Act's record-keeping and equipment
identification requirements.
Companies which manufacture, sell or distribute VGMs are also subject to
various provincial, state, county and municipal laws and regulations. The
primary purpose of these rules is to insure the responsibility, financial
stability and character of video gaming equipment companies and their key
personnel and stockholders. The regulations governing VGMs resemble the pari-
mutuel and sports wagering regulations in all the basic elements described
above.
The operation of video gaming devices as well as the manufacture and
distribution of such devices is extensively regulated in Nevada. See the
discussion of the Nevada regulatory process above. The Nevada authorities may
also require a manufacturer of associated equipment to be found suitable.
Neither the Company nor any wholly owned subsidiary thereof has been required
to be licensed or has been required to be found suitable to operate or
manufacture and distribute video gaming devices and there can be no assurance
that the Company or any subsidiary can obtain any required license or would be
found suitable.
The Company intends to apply for all necessary licenses in the jurisdictions
currently authorizing video gaming. The Company also plans to do business in
other jurisdictions which may authorize video gaming operations in the future.
The Company cannot predict the nature of the regulatory scheme in any of these
jurisdictions.
On-Line Lottery
At the present time, 36 states and the District of Columbia authorize
lotteries. Once authorized, the award of lottery contracts and ongoing
operation of lotteries in the United States is highly regulated. Although
certain of the features of a lottery, such as the percentage of gross revenues
which must be paid back to players in prize money, are usually established by
legislation, the lottery authorities generally exercise significant authority,
including the determination of the types of games played, the price of each
wager, the manner in which the lottery is marketed, and the selection of the
vendors of equipment and services.
To ensure the integrity of the contract award and wagering process, most
jurisdictions require detailed background disclosure on a continuous basis
from, and conduct background investigations of, the vendor, its subsidiaries
and affiliates and its principal shareholders. Background investigations of
the vendor's employees who will be directly responsible for the operation of
the system are also generally conducted, and most states reserve the right to
require the removal of employees who they deem to be unsuitable or whose
presence they believe may adversely affect the operational security or
integrity of the lottery. Certain jurisdictions also require extensive
personal and financial disclosure and background checks from persons and
entities beneficially owning a specified percentage (typically 5% or more) of
the Company's securities. The failure of such beneficial owners to submit to
such background checks and provide such disclosure could result in the
imposition of penalties upon such beneficial owners and could jeopardize the
award of a lottery contract to the Company or provide grounds for termination
of an existing lottery contract.
The international jurisdictions in which the Company markets its lottery
systems also usually have legislation and regulations governing lottery
operations. The regulation of lotteries in these international jurisdictions
typically varies from the regulation of lotteries in the United States. In
addition, restrictions are often
14
<PAGE>
imposed on foreign corporations seeking to do business in such jurisdictions.
United States and international regulations affecting lotteries are subject to
change. The Company cannot predict with certainty the impact on its business
of changes in regulations.
Simulcasting
The Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC") regulates the use and
transfer of earth station licenses used to operate the Company's simulcasting
operations. To obtain an earth station license, the applicant must file an
application with the FCC. The FCC then places the application on public notice
and solicits comments for a thirty-day period, during which no action is taken
on the application. At the expiration of the public notice period, assuming no
objections are received from the public, the FCC usually will grant the
application within two to three weeks if it determines that the granting of
such applications is in the public interest.
The Company's applications for assignment of the earth station licenses
currently held by LDDS Corporation to the Company will require a ruling by the
FCC that the Company's two foreign directors (who are citizens of Canada and
the United Kingdom, respectively) do not adversely affect the public interest.
The processing of these assignment applications therefore will likely exceed
the normal two- to three-week processing period. If FCC approval of the
license assignments is received, the Company will be required to pay to the
FCC an annual fee on a per-station basis and file renewal applications
annually. Failure to comply with these obligations in a timely fashion may
result in the assessment of fines or forfeitures. With respect to the
Company's ownership of Autotote Communications, the Company's application
requesting approval of the transfer of control of the earth station licenses
held by Marvin H. Sugarman Productions is currently pending. There can be no
assurance that the Company's applications to transfer any of the earth station
licenses will be successful.
EMPLOYEES
As of October 31, 1994, the Company employed approximately 1,070 persons. Of
this total approximately 450 were engaged in full-time field operations and
approximately 250 in part-time tellering/cashiering for AEI, approximately 100
in manufacturing and operations support, approximately 160 in software,
engineering and product development, approximately 30 in marketing and
approximately 80 in financial, administration and other positions. Most of the
North American pari-mutuel employees of the Company's subsidiary Autotote
Systems, Inc. ("ASI") involved in field operations and repairs are represented
by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (the "IBEW") under two
separate contracts, both of which expire in 1997. ASI's former contracts with
Local 3 IBEW expired on May 31, 1994, and on August 22, 1994, ASI's field
service employees represented by IBEW went on strike for a new collective
bargaining agreement. On October 25, 1994 the employees ratified a new three
year agreement and returned to work. Certain of the persons employed by the
Company in Austria and Germany are members of national workers councils. The
Company considers its employee relations to be satisfactory.
15
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
The directors and executive officers of Autotote Corporation as of October
31, 1994 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIRECTOR
NAME AGE POSITION SINCE
- ---- --- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
A. Lorne Weil................. 48 Chairman of the Board and Chief 1989
Executive Officer(1)
Larry J. Lawrence............. 52 Director(1)(2)(3)(4) 1989
Thomas H. Lee................. 50 Director(1)(4) 1991
Sir Brian Wolfson............. 58 Director(3) 1988
Alan J. Zakon................. 59 Director(1)(2)(3) 1993
Marshall Bartlett............. 68 Director 1991
Dennis C. Wallach............. 50 Senior Vice President and Chief --
Financial Officer
John A. DeVries............... 71 Executive Vice President --
William Huntley............... 44 Vice President, Operations --
Martin E. Schloss............. 48 Vice President and General Counsel --
Robert D. Ciunci.............. 48 Vice President, Finance --
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Member of Executive Committee
(2) Member of Audit Committee
(3) Member of Compensation Committee
(4) Member of Stock Option Committee
All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and
thereafter until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers of
the Company hold office for an indefinite term, subject to the discretion of
the Board of Directors.
Mr. A. Lorne Weil has been a director of the Company since December 1989,
Chairman of the Board since October 31, 1991 and Chief Executive Officer since
April 1992. From 1982 until 1989, Mr. Weil was a director and consultant to
the holding company for ASI. From October 1990 until April 1992, Mr. Weil held
various senior management positions at the Company and its subsidiaries. From
1979 to November 1992 he was the President of Lorne Weil, Inc., a firm
providing strategic planning and corporate development services to the high
technology industry. Mr. Weil is currently a director of Fruit of the Loom,
Inc. and General Growth Properties, Inc.
Mr. Larry J. Lawrence has been a director of the Company since December
1989. He is co-founder and since 1985 has been managing partner of Lawrence
Venture Partners, the general partner of Lawrence, Tyrrell, Ortale & Smith, a
private equity fund manager. Since 1990, he has been managing partner of LTOS
II Partners, the general partner of Lawrence, Tyrrell, Ortale & Smith II. Mr.
Lawrence is a director of The Earth Technology Corporation and of several
private companies. Mr. Lawrence served as a director of the holding company
for ASI prior to its acquisition by the Company.
Mr. Marshall Bartlett has been a director of the Company since December
1991. From June 1993 to March 1994 Mr. Bartlett was employed by the Company in
various capacities. Mr. Bartlett is currently a consultant to the Company. Mr.
Bartlett was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Bourns
Inc., an electronic component manufacturer from 1979 until his retirement in
1991.
Mr. Thomas H. Lee has been a director of the Company since December 1991.
Mr. Lee founded the Thomas H. Lee Company in 1974 and since that time has
served as its President. Thomas H. Lee Company provides investment banking and
other financial advisory services to private and publicly held companies, and
through its affiliates participates in leveraged acquisitions. Mr. Lee is a
director of General Nutrition Companies, Inc.,
16
<PAGE>
General Nutrition, Inc., Health o Meter Products, Inc., Health-o-Meter, Inc.,
Hills Stores Company, J. Baker, Inc., Finlay Enterprises, Inc., Finlay Fine
Jewelry Corporation, Playtex Products Inc., Snapple Beverage Corp. and Gillett
Holdings, Inc. Mr. Lee is also a general partner of the ML-Lee Acquisition
Fund, L.P., ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. and the ML-Lee Acquisition Fund
(Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. (the "ML-Lee Acquisition Funds"), Chairman and
Trustee of Thomas H. Lee Advisors I, and a general partner of Thomas H. Lee
Advisors II, L.P., the investment advisors to the ML-Lee Acquisition Funds. He
is the general partner of THL Equity Advisors Limited Partnership, the general
partner of and investment advisor to Thomas H. Lee Equity Partners, L.P. In
February 1991, Hills Department Stores, Inc. filed for protection under
Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. Mr. Lee was a director of the
holding company for ASI prior to its acquisition by the Company.
Sir Brian Wolfson has been a director of the Company since 1988. He served
as Acting President and Chief Executive Officer from June 1991 until October
31, 1991. Since 1987 he has been the Chairman of Wembley plc, a United Kingdom
corporation whose holdings include The Wembley Stadium, Arena and Conference
Centre and Exhibition Halls in London. Sir Brian is also a director of Kepner-
Tregoe, Inc. and Fruit of the Loom, Inc.
Mr. Alan J. Zakon has been a director of the Company since 1993. Since 1990,
he has served as managing director of Bankers Trust Corporation. From 1989
until 1990, Mr. Zakon served as Chairman of the Strategic Policy Committee of
Bankers Trust Corporation. From 1986 until 1989, Mr. Zakon served as Chairman
of the Board of Boston Consulting Group. Mr. Zakon is a director of Arkansas
Best Freight Corporation, Augat Corporation, Hechinger Corporation, Boyle
Leasing Technologies, and Laurentian Capital Corporation.
Mr. Robert D. Ciunci has been Secretary and Vice President--Finance since
October 31, 1991. Mr. Ciunci joined ASI in 1981 as Controller, was elected
Assistant Secretary in November 1983 and assumed the positions of Vice
President--Finance and Treasurer in 1990. Mr. Ciunci is a certified public
accountant and has a Masters degree in Business Administration from Widener
University.
Mr. Dennis C. Wallach has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company since February 1994. From May 1991 through December
1993, Mr. Wallach was President and Chief Executive Officer of ASCOM
Communications Inc., a company which owned and operated pay phones. From May
1989 through May 1991, Mr. Wallach was President and Founder of Wallach
Associates, which provided strategic planning services to European electronic
companies. From August 1988 through May 1989, Mr. Wallach was President and
Chief Operating Officer of Sigmatron Inc. a manufacturer of electronic
products for cable television, consumer products and wagering equipment.
Mr. John A. DeVries has been Executive Vice President of the Company since
December 1993 and President of Autotote Lottery since June 1993. From April
1989 through May 1993, Mr. DeVries was self-employed. From September 1970
through March 1989, Mr. DeVries was employed by General Instrument Corporation
first as Vice President and later as Senior Vice President and Group
Executive.
Mr. William J. Huntley has been Vice President--Operations since October 31,
1991. Mr. Huntley joined ASI in 1972 and has served in various positions
including Vice President--Operations. He was elected Vice President--
Operations of ASI in December 1989 and Vice President--Operations of the
Company in 1994.
Mr. Martin E. Schloss has been Vice President and General Counsel since
December 1992. From July 1992 until December 1992, Mr. Schloss provided
consulting services to and was employed by the Company. From 1976 to 1992, Mr.
Schloss served in various positions in the legal department of General
Instrument Corporation, with the exception of a hiatus of approximately one
and one-half years. While at General Instrument, he was responsible for a
significant portion of AmTote International, Inc.'s legal matters and has
extensive experience in the international wagering industry.
17
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company leases its corporate headquarters, which are located at 888
Seventh Avenue, Suite 1808, New York, New York 10106. The Company owns a
development facility aggregating 39,750 square feet in Newark, Delaware, and
recently sold its other Newark facility, which was formerly used for
manufacturing. The Company's development facilities are subject to a first
mortgage in connection with the Company's economic development revenue bond.
The Company leases approximately 16,000 feet of office and warehouse space
in Rocky Hill, Connecticut in order to operate the Connecticut State Lottery.
It is also leasing approximately 13,000 square feet of space in Owings Mills,
Maryland as corporate offices and a development facility for Autotote Lottery.
The Company leases approximately 2,700 feet of warehouse space in Stanton,
Delaware, leases office space for its regional sales, support office in Tampa,
Florida and 10,000 feet of warehouse space in Tampa, Florida. The Company also
leases approximately 10,000 square feet for its manufacturing facilities in
Ballymahon, Ireland, 7,000 square feet for its facility in Athlone, Ireland
and 27,000 square feet for its facility in Vienna, Austria. Finally, the
Company is currently constructing a new facility of 19,250 square feet for its
sports wagering business in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The Company leases space for the Connecticut OTB locations in Norwalk,
Bridgeport, West Haven, East Haven, Meriden, New Britain, Bristol, Waterbury
and Torrington and a teletheater in New Haven. The Company recently purchased
teletheaters in Windsor Locks and in New Haven, both of which relate to the
operation of the Connecticut OTB. The Company is in the process of
constructing a sports entertainment complex at its teletheater facility in New
Haven, where the central off-track betting computer operations for the
Connecticut OTB are located. While the Company believes its facilities are
adequate for its current needs, the Company is evaluating alternative
facilities which may be more suitable for the Company's operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In addition to routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its
business, the Company and certain of its officers and directors have been
named as defendants in lawsuits commenced in February 1995 as class actions in
the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The putative
classes consist of purchasers of Class A Common Stock and put and call options
between March 1994 and January 30, 1995. The complaints allege that the
Company and certain of its officers and directors violated the federal
securities laws and seek remedies of unspecified monetary damages and awards
of fees and expenses. The Company intends to vigorously defend these
proceedings. However, the ultimate outcome of the actions cannot yet be
determined, and no provision for any liability, if any, that may result from
the actions has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
ASI and the Company were recently defendants in an arbitration claim by
Multivest (PTE) Limited ("Multivest"). The subject matter of the arbitration
involved a joint venture in which Multivest was a party and had agreed to
acquire and contribute equipment and facilities necessary to operate an on-
line lottery system in the Guangdong Province of the People's Republic of
China. Multivest contracted with ASI to provide the lottery system. The
arbitration claim alleged breach of contract by ASI with respect to its
confidentiality obligations thereunder. The claim sought damages in the amount
of approximately $250 million. Multivest withdrew its claim in January 1995.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
18
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's Class A Common Stock is traded under the symbol "TOTE" in the
NASDAQ National Market System. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the range of high and low closing prices of the Company's Class A
Common Stock in the NASDAQ National Market System, adjusted retroactively to
reflect (i) a three-for-two stock split in the form of a stock dividend of one
share of Class A Common Stock for every two shares outstanding effective in
June 1993, and (ii) a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock dividend
of one share of Class A Common Stock for every share outstanding effective in
October 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal 1993--
First Quarter............................................. $ 8.00 $ 3.92
Second Quarter............................................ $11.63 $ 6.83
Third Quarter............................................. $17.75 $11.50
Fourth Quarter............................................ $26.50 $16.50
Fiscal 1994--
First Quarter............................................. $28.50 $18.50
Second Quarter............................................ $29.25 $17.75
Third Quarter............................................. $21.75 $15.00
Fourth Quarter............................................ $20.25 $13.25
</TABLE>
As of February 1, 1995, the Company had approximately 438 holders of record
of its Class A Common Stock.
The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock. The Board
of Directors presently intends to retain all earnings for use in the Company's
business. Any future determination as to payment of dividends will depend upon
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and such
other factors as are deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
Under the terms of the Company's senior credit facility, the Company is not
permitted to pay any cash dividends or make any other distributions (other
than stock dividends) on its Common Stock.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected historical financial data presented below as of and for the five
years ended October 31, 1994 have been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of the Company, which financial statements have been
audited by KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent certified public accountants.
The following financial information should be read in conjunction with Item 7,
Management's Discussion and Analysis to Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the
notes thereto, included in Item 8. The following financial information gives
effect to (i) a three-for-two stock split in the form of a stock dividend of
one share of Class A Common Stock for every two shares outstanding paid on
June 30, 1993 and (ii) a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock
dividend of one share of Class A Common Stock for each share outstanding paid
on October 25, 1993. The following financial data also reflects the
acquisition of Marvin H. Sugarman Productions and its affiliate Racing
Technology, Inc. which has been accounted for as a pooling of interests.
Accordingly, the historical financial data has been restated to reflect the
pooling.
19
<PAGE>
FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
-------- --------- --------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Selected Statement of
Operations Data:
Operating Revenues:
Wagering Systems......... $ 50,382 $ 39,104 $ 40,526 $ 59,792 $ 98,592
Wagering Equipment and
Other Sales ............ 9,816 8,942 7,838 25,070 50,458
Divested Business
Racetracks.............. 13,248 -- -- -- --
-------- --------- --------- -------- --------
73,446 48,046 48,364 84,862 149,050
Expenses and Costs:
Wagering Systems......... 26,536 20,692 20,713 36,513 61,158
Inventory, Equipment and
Contract Adjustments.... -- -- -- -- 3,939
Strike Expenses.......... -- -- -- -- 2,842
Wagering Equipment and
Other Sales............. 5,897 5,080 4,606 11,679 35,753
Divested Business
Racetracks.............. 11,815 -- -- -- --
Selling, general and
administrative.......... 7,299 7,234 6,419 10,956 25,298
Write-Off of Investments
and Other............... -- -- -- -- 4,737
Restructuring............ -- -- -- -- 3,839
Depreciation and
amortization............ 14,145 11,137 7,840 11,809 25,418
Interest, net............ 9,583 8,999 5,804 3,240 6,103
Other Income............. -- (6) (382) (65) (647)
Proceeds from Insurance
Claim................... -- -- (3,000) -- --
Write-Off of Financing
Fees and Expenses....... -- -- -- -- 4,222
Write-Off of Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. -- 77,721 -- -- --
Operations of Divested
Business................ -- 4,818 -- -- --
Divestiture Expenses..... -- 1,338 -- -- --
Litigation Expenses...... 1,500 660 (382) -- --
-------- --------- --------- -------- --------
76,775 137,673 41,513 74,132 172,662
Net Earnings (Loss)........ $ (2,551) $ (77,543) $ 5,727 $ 9,438 $(22,150)
Net Earnings (Loss) Per
Common Share (Primary).... $ (0.17) $ (4.42) $ 0.37 0.33 $ (.79)
Net Earnings (Loss) Per
Common Share
(Fully Diluted)........... $ (0.17) $ (4.42) $ 0.36 0.33 $ (.79)
Selected Balance Sheet Data
(End of Period):
Total Assets............... $157,399 $ 45,431 $ 62,950 $187,105 $245,854
Total Long-Term Debt
(Including Current
Installments)............. 27,583 54,326 57,231 76,987 143,955
Stockholders' Equity
(deficiency).............. $ 51,730 $ (28,775) $ (20,972) $ 76,079 $ 55,721
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding (Primary)..... 14,648 17,546 15,425 28,210 28,174
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding
(Fully Diluted)........... 14,648 17,546 15,911 28,911 28,174
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Restatement of Quarters and Significant Provisions
The Company has restated its interim financial results for the first, second
and third quarters of fiscal 1994, as described below. The restatement relates
principally to: (i) inclusion in wagering equipment operating expenses in the
third quarter of $5.9 million out of a total of $7.5 million non-tax
deductible payment in 1994 made to former Tele Control Group stockholders
pursuant to contingent payment provisions in the Tele Control Group
acquisition agreement as a result of the award of certain lottery contracts to
the Tele Control Group in the third quarter; (ii) an annualized increase of
$5.3 million in amortization and depreciation as a result of the final review
of the allocation of purchase price and the useful life of goodwill and
certain other assets, recorded in connection with the 1993 acquisitions of the
Tele Control Group, the ETAG Group, Autotote Lottery and the right to operate
the Connecticut OTB (the "1993 Acquisitions"); (iii) $3.3 million in
corrections consisting of inventory, equipment and contract adjustments
resulting in charges to the financial statements delivered by the sellers in
connection with the Company's acquisition on July 20, 1994 of Marvin H.
Sugarman Productions, Inc., and Racing Technology, Inc., for periods prior to
the acquisition; and other factors.
The following table presents a summary of unaudited quarterly financial
information for the first three quarters of fiscal 1994, as previously
reported and as restated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED
JANUARY 31, 1994 APRIL 30, 1994 JULY 31, 1994
---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------
PREVIOUSLY AS RESTATED PREVIOUSLY AS RESTATED PREVIOUSLY
REPORTED (A) REPORTED (A) REPORTED (A) AS RESTATED
---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ -----------
IN THOUSANDS (EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues...... $26,964 28,289 37,836 38,446 41,769 41,136
Operating Expenses...... 16,301 17,083 21,424 24,274 21,784 30,306
Gross Profit............ 10,663 11,206 16,412 14,172 19,985 10,830
Selling, General &
Administrative......... 4,151 5,066 4,734 5,751 5,791 5,867
Depreciation &
Amortization........... 3,744 5,121 4,688 6,065 4,977 6,032
Operating Income/(Loss). 2,768 1,019 6,990 2,356 9,217 (1,069)
Interest & Other
(Income)/Expense....... 1,158 1,178 1,232 1,253 1,481 1,598
Earnings/(Loss) Before
Income Taxes And
Extraordinary Item..... 1,610 (159) 5,758 1,103 7,736 (2,667)
Income Taxes/(Benefit).. (281) (56) 997 150 1,160 (453)
Net Earnings/(Loss)
Before Extraordinary
Item................... 1,891 (103) 4,761 953 6,576 (2,214)
Extraordinary Item
Write-off of Financing
Fees and Expenses..... -- -- 2,477 4,222 -- --
Net Earnings/(Loss)..... $ 1,891 (103) 2,284 (3,269) 6,576 (2,214)
NET EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER
COMMON SHARE (B)
Earnings/(Loss) Before
Extraordinary Item... 0.06 0.00 0.15 0.03 0.20 (0.08)
Extraordinary Item -- -- (0.08) (0.15) -- --
Net Earnings/(Loss)... 0.06 0.00 0.07 (0.12) 0.20 (0.08)
Weighted Avg. No. Of
Shares Outstanding... 32,561 27,987 32,607 28,107 32,714 28,196
</TABLE>
21
<PAGE>
- --------
(a) The restated quarterly financial information for the first and second
quarters of fiscal 1994 reflects the acquisition on July 20, 1994 of
Marvin H. Sugarman Productions, Inc. and Racing Technology, Inc., which
has been accounted for as a pooling of interests. The acquisition was
included in the quarterly financial information previously reported for
the third quarter of fiscal 1994.
(b) Net Earnings/(Loss) per common share are based on the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and the
dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and other common stock
equivalents. Common stock equivalents are not included in the calculation
of loss per share since their inclusion would be antidilutive.
BACKGROUND
The net loss recorded for the year ended October 31, 1994 was $22.2 million
or $0.79 per share. Factors which contributed to the magnitude of the fiscal
1994 loss include charges of approximately $3.8 million resulting from closing
the Company's Newark, Delaware manufacturing facility and discontinuation of
certain product lines; a $4.7 million write-off of certain assets principally
related to domestic and overseas projects; costs of $2.8 million incurred as a
result of a strike by the field service employees of the Company's subsidiary,
Autotote Systems, Inc. ("ASI"); and an extraordinary item consisting of a non-
cash write-off of financing fees and expenses of $4.2 million associated with
the Company's repayment of its prior senior bank credit facility. Additional
factors contributing to the loss in fiscal 1994 include charges of $7.5
million to operating expenses for payments in 1994 to former stockholders of
the Tele Control Group pursuant to contingent payment provisions in the Tele
Control Group acquisition agreement; $5.3 million in amortization and
depreciation as a result of the final review of the allocation of purchase
price and the useful life of goodwill and certain other assets recorded in
connection with the 1993 Acquisitions; inventory, equipment and contract
adjustments resulting in charges of $3.9 million, of which $3.3 million
relates to corrections to the financial statements delivered by the seller in
connection with the Company's acquisition of Marvin H. Sugarman Productions,
Inc., and Racing Technology, Inc. for periods prior to the acquisition; and
adjustments to the tax liability relating to certain income generated from the
Company's international operations. No tax benefit is available for the
operating expense payments in 1994 to the former Tele Control Group
stockholders or the amortization of goodwill. The loss in 1994 did not permit
the recognition of a tax benefit related to the extraordinary write-off of
financing fees and expenses.
The consolidated statements of operations for the years ended October 31,
1994 and 1993 reflect the following acquisitions: Autotote Lottery and the
ETAG Group in June 1993, the right to operate the Connecticut OTB in July
1993, and the Tele Control Group in September 1993. All figures have been
restated to reflect the acquisition of Marvin H. Sugarman Productions, Inc.
and Racing Technology, Inc. in July 1994, which was accounted for on a
"pooling of interests" basis.
Historically, the Company's revenues have come from two sources: service
contracts and sales contracts for equipment and software. Service revenue
pursuant to multi-year service contracts is typically based on handle. The
first quarter of the fiscal year is traditionally the weakest for service
revenue for seasonal reasons. Sales revenue usually reflects a limited number
of large sales which do not recur on an annual basis, but which historically
have given rise to terminal sales and the provision of systems software to
existing customers. The Company's ability to expand is dependent upon its
ability to fulfill and retain its existing contracts and obtain additional
contracts. The Company intends to increase its focus on the international
market. The sale and delivery of wagering systems and equipment depend on
various factors, including customer requirements as to the capabilities and
features of the system and the delivery schedule. Consequently, revenue and
operating results could vary substantially as a result of the timing of
revenue recognition from major equipment sales. The timing of these sales can
affect not only annual performance, but can make quarterly results highly
variable and unpredictable.
FISCAL 1994 COMPARED TO FISCAL 1993
Revenue Analysis
Total revenues increased 76% or $64.2 million to $149.1 million for the year
ended October 31, 1994 from $84.9 million in fiscal 1993. The 1993
Acquisitions, completed in the second half of fiscal 1993, contributed
22
<PAGE>
$61.3 million to revenues in fiscal 1994 and $17.1 million to revenues in
fiscal 1993. Wagering equipment and other sales revenues, exclusive of
equipment and other sales revenue attributable to the Tele Control and
Autotote Lottery subsidiaries of $10.0 million in fiscal 1994 and $1.6 million
in fiscal 1993, increased $16.9 million in 1994 compared to 1993. Wagering
equipment sales revenue in 1994 included (i) large equipment sales and a
software upgrade totaling $7.7 million to foreign customers; (ii) $25.8
million attributable to the completion of the Company's contract to deliver
the MAX 2000 terminals to Italy's TOTIP pool; and (iii) $6.3 million
attributable to international lottery contracts received by the Company's Tele
Control subsidiary. In addition, the Company delivered eight sports wagering
systems in 1994 compared to six in 1993. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1994,
the Company experienced delays in the start-up of certain international
contracts and buying decisions by other international customers. These delays
continued in the first quarter of fiscal 1995 and adversely affected wagering
equipment and other sales revenues in the first quarter.
Exclusive of revenues attributable to the 1993 Acquisitions, wagering system
revenues increased from $44.9 million in 1993 to $48.1 million in 1994,
primarily due to the full year effect of revenue generated from wagering
system contracts which became operational during 1993 and 1994, offset in part
by severe winter weather in the Northeast and the earthquake in California.
Wagering systems revenues attributable to the 1993 Acquisitions totaled $50.5
million in fiscal 1994 and $14.9 million in fiscal 1993. Total handle
processed by the Company was approximately $11.6 billion for 1994 and $10.8
billion for 1993. Simulcasting revenues were $7.6 million in fiscal 1994 and
$5.4 million in fiscal 1993.
Expense Analysis
Gross margin on wagering equipment and other sales decreased to 29% in
fiscal 1994 from 53% in fiscal 1993, due in part to the charge of $7.5 million
included in wagering equipment sales operating expenses in fiscal 1994,
reflecting payments in 1994 to former Tele Control Group stockholders pursuant
to contingent payment provisions in the Tele Control Group acquisition
agreement as a result of the award of lottery contracts to the Tele Control
Group in 1994. Before giving effect to the Tele Control Group payment, gross
margin on wagering equipment and other sales for fiscal 1994 decreased to 44%
from 53% in fiscal 1993. Fiscal 1993 wagering equipment and other sales
margins were favorably affected by higher margins associated with $1.9 million
of revenue attributable to the non-recurring grant of an exclusive software
license in France for the Autotrak II system and $3.5 million of revenue
attributable to components of revenue under the Company's contract to supply
MAX 2000 terminals to Italy's TOTIP pool in part as a result of achieving a
milestone in connection with the contract.
Gross margins on wagering systems decreased from 39% in fiscal 1993 to 31%
in fiscal 1994, due primarily to non-cash inventory, equipment and contract
adjustments of $3.9 million and strike expenses of $2.8 million in fiscal
1994. Inventory, equipment and contract adjustments consist principally of
corrections to financial statements delivered by the seller in connection with
the Company's acquisition in July, 1994 of Marvin H. Sugarman Productions,
Inc. and Racing Technology, Inc. for periods prior to the acquisition. The
acquisition was accounted for on a "pooling of interests" basis. Strike
expenses consist of contract labor, security, legal and other costs incurred
as a result of a strike by the field service employees of ASI. The strike
affected approximately 275 of ASI's field service employees and was settled in
late October, 1994. The Company expects that as a result of the settlement of
the strike, the Company's ASI field service labor costs will decrease in
fiscal 1995 and the following two years of the union contract. The Company
also expects to have increased flexibility in labor deployment. Before giving
effect to the foregoing inventory, equipment and contract adjustments and the
strike expenses, gross margins on wagering systems for fiscal 1994 decreased
to 38% from 39% in fiscal 1993.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include marketing, sales,
administrative, engineering and product development, finance, legal and other
expenses. These expenses increased to $25.3 million for fiscal 1994 from $11.0
million in fiscal 1993, an increase of $14.3 million or 131%. Approximately
$4.9 million of the increase is due to the full year effect of selling,
general and administrative expenses related to the 1993 Acquisitions.
Additional increases in fiscal 1994 selling, general and administrative
expenses reflected the
23
<PAGE>
strengthening of the Company's management structure; and the Company's
expanded multicontinent business; and expansion of the Company's international
and North American marketing efforts, specifically in the on-line lottery and
sports wagering businesses and increased product development expenses. The
Company also incurred significant accounting, legal and consulting fees
associated with the audit of its fiscal 1994 financial statements, resulting
in a charge of approximately $1 million.
Product development expenditures in fiscal 1994 were $10.3 million, up from
$5.6 million in fiscal 1993, reflecting increases in new product development,
product enhancement and product support. Approximately $3.6 million of the
fiscal 1994 development expenditures are included in the statement of
operations, approximately $6.0 million was capitalized with respect to
development of lottery and video lottery systems and $700,000 was reimbursed
by customers. Approximately $1.0 million of fiscal 1993 development expense is
included in the statement of operations, approximately $600,000 was directly
allocated to projects, and $1.6 million was reimbursed by customers. $2.4
million relating to development of the MAX 6000 terminals and lottery systems
was capitalized in fiscal 1993.
In fiscal 1994, as part of the Company's plan to reduce manufacturing costs
and utilize its working capital more effectively, the Company determined to
close and dispose of its Newark, Delaware manufacturing facility and eliminate
certain product lines by the end of the first calendar quarter of 1995. This
facility has been closed and sold and the production of certain product lines
has been or will be discontinued and all future manufacturing will be
relocated either to the Company's manufacturing facility in Ballymahon,
Ireland, or, as appropriate, to North American subcontractors. Accordingly,
fiscal 1994 operating expenses include a restructuring charge of $3.8 million.
The restructuring charge includes costs of plant shut-down and severance
($450,000), and write-offs of leasehold improvements and machinery, equipment
and inventory ($3.7 million), net of a gain of $350,000 upon the disposition
of the manufacturing facility. Cash expenditures included in the restructuring
charge are primarily costs of plant shutdown and employee severance costs and
were incurred primarily during the first and second quarters of 1995. The
Company expects that the restructuring will result in lower manufacturing and
operating costs and more efficient use of working capital. In addition, in
fiscal 1994 the Company wrote-off approximately $4.7 million of its
investments in certain assets principally related to domestic and overseas
projects.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased 115% to $25.4 million in
fiscal 1994 from $11.8 million in fiscal 1993. The increase is due in part to
increases in amortization and depreciation as a result of management's final
review of the allocation of purchase price and the useful life of goodwill and
certain other assets recorded in connection with the 1993 Acquisitions. This
final review resulted in $5.3 million in increased annual depreciation and
amortization with respect to the 1993 Acquisitions. The Company is continuing
to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with the
acquisition of the Tele Control Group ($11.8 million net of accumulated
amortization as of October 31, 1994). The increase also reflects the full year
effect of amortization and depreciation associated with the 1993 Acquisitions
and increased depreciation with respect to capital additions made in North
America to the Company's wagering systems base during fiscal years 1993 and
1994. The Company anticipates increased depreciation and amortization of up to
$2.8 million in fiscal 1995 on an annualized basis as a result of recently
announced acquisitions. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below.
The operating loss was $13.9 million in fiscal 1994 compared to $13.9 million
of operating income in fiscal 1993, reflecting operating expenses attributable
to the payments in 1994 to the former Tele Control Group stockholders pursuant
to the Tele Control acquisition agreement, adjustments to the financial
statements for Marvin H. Sugarman Productions, Inc. and Racing Technology,
Inc. for periods prior to acquisition, strike expenses, write-offs of
investments, restructuring charges and increased depreciation and
amortization.
Interest expense increased $2.9 million to $6.4 million in fiscal 1994
compared to $3.5 million in fiscal 1993. The increase primarily reflects
increased borrowings associated with the construction of wagering systems
equipment and with the 1993 Acquisitions. Interest costs of $819,000 and $1.1
million were capitalized in 1993
24
<PAGE>
and 1994, respectively, reflecting additional costs of construction of
wagering systems placed in service pursuant to wagering systems contracts.
Income Taxes
Effective income tax rates before extraordinary item were approximately 8%
in fiscal 1994 compared to 12% for fiscal 1993. The rate for fiscal 1994
reflects the non-tax deductible nature of the payments in 1994 to former Tele
Control Group stockholders included in wagering equipment sales operating
expenses, the mix in earnings between foreign and domestic operations,
increased non-deductible goodwill amortization and an increase in the tax
liability relating to certain income generated from the Company's
international operations. The loss in 1994 did not permit the recognition of a
tax benefit related to the extraordinary write-off of financing fees and
expenses of $4.2 million associated with the Company's repayment of its prior
senior credit facility. The rate for 1993 differs from the U.S. statutory tax
rate of 34% principally due to foreign earnings taxed at a lower income tax
rate than the U.S. tax rate, the utilization of foreign tax credits and other
business credits in 1993 and adjustments to prior years' income tax accruals.
Net Earnings (Loss)
Net loss for fiscal 1994 was $22.2 million or $.79 per share compared to
fiscal 1993 earnings of $9.4 million or $0.33 per share. Without giving effect
to the extraordinary non-cash charge of $4.2 million to write-off financing
fees and expenses associated with the Company's repayment of its prior senior
bank credit facility, the net loss for fiscal 1994 was $18.0 million or $0.64
per share. The primary earnings / (loss) per share was calculated using
approximately 28.2 million weighted average shares outstanding in both fiscal
1994 and fiscal 1993. The weighted average shares outstanding for 1993 have
been adjusted for 3-for-2 and 2-for-1 stock splits which occurred during 1993.
FISCAL 1993 COMPARED TO FISCAL 1992
Revenue Analysis
Total revenues increased 75% or $36.5 million to $84.9 million for the year
ended October 31, 1993 from $48.4 million in 1992. The Company completed the
1993 Acquisitions during the year which contributed $17.2 million in revenues
for fiscal 1993. Wagering equipment and other sales revenues increased $17.2
million in 1993 compared to 1992. Wagering equipment and other sales revenue
in 1993 included (i) nonrecurring large equipment sales to foreign customers;
(ii) $3.5 million of revenue attributable to components of revenue under the
Company's contract to supply MAX 2000 terminals to Italy's TOTIP pool in part
as a result of achieving a milestone in connection with the contract; (iii)
$1.2 million attributable to the delivery of MAX 2000 terminals to Italy's
TOTIP pool; and (iv) $1.9 million from the grant of an exclusive software
license in France for the Autotrak II system. In addition the Company
delivered six sports wagering systems in 1993 compared to one in 1992.
Exclusive of the Company's revenues attributable to acquisitions during 1993,
wagering system revenues increased $4.4 million over 1992, primarily due to
revenue generated from wagering system contracts which became operational
during 1993 and the expansion of simulcast and inter-track wagering during the
year, offset in part by rate reductions associated with contract renewals.
Wagering systems revenues attributable to these acquisitions during fiscal
1993 totaled $14.9 million. Total handle processed by the Company was
approximately $10.8 billion for 1993 compared to $7.9 billion for 1992.
Simulcasting revenues were $5.4 million in fiscal 1993 and $5.6 million in
fiscal 1992.
Expense Analysis
Gross margin on wagering equipment and other sales increased to 53% in
fiscal 1993 from 41% in fiscal 1992, principally due to higher margins
associated with sales of non pari-mutuel and sports wagering systems, and the
non-recurring grant of the software license. Gross margins on wagering systems
declined from 49% in 1992 to 39% in fiscal 1993, primarily due to lower
overall gross margins caused by start-up expenses related to
25
<PAGE>
contracts which become operational in fiscal 1993 and costs associated with
one day operational problems the Company experienced in the start-up of its
new wagering systems at Santa Anita Park and SCOTWINC in the first quarter of
fiscal 1993. In addition, gross margins on wagering systems for fiscal 1993
reflect the labor intensive nature of the operations of the Connecticut OTB,
which has lower related depreciation and amortization expenses compared to the
Company's wagering systems contract business. Operating margins decreased from
18% in fiscal 1992 to 16% in fiscal 1993, principally due to increased
depreciation and amortization expense associated with new equipment under
recently signed wagering systems contracts, as well as selling, general and
administrative expenses relating to the Company's 1993 Acquisitions.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include marketing, sales,
administrative, engineering and product development, finance, legal and other
expenses. These expenses increased $4.6 million to $11.0 million for fiscal
1993 from $6.4 million in fiscal 1992, primarily reflecting increases in
marketing expenses associated with the expansion of the Company's North
American and international marketing efforts, a significant portion of which
is related to the Company's on-line lottery business, the 1992 capitalization
of $1.1 million of development cost related to the PROBE terminal and
increases in management personnel as well as expenses related to the on-going
operations of the 1993 Acquisitions.
Product development expenditures in fiscal 1993 were $5.6 million, up from
$3.5 million in fiscal 1992, reflecting increases in new product development,
product enhancement and product support. Approximately $1.0 million of fiscal
1993 development expense is included in the statement of operations,
approximately $0.6 million was directly allocated to projects, and $1.6
million was reimbursed by customers. $2.4 million relating to development of
the MAX 6000 terminals and lottery systems was capitalized. The increase in
lottery development and promotion expenses is expected to continue in fiscal
1994.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased 51% to $11.8 million in
fiscal 1993 compared to $7.8 million in fiscal 1992. The increase is due
primarily to the depreciation on the new PROBE systems installed at customer
sites in 1993.
Operating income was $13.9 million in fiscal 1993 compared to $8.8 million
in 1992 reflecting increases in revenues, higher margins on revenue associated
with the TOTIP contract and the software license, the increase in sports
wagering systems and contributions from new acquisitions.
Interest expense declined $2.4 million to $3.5 million in fiscal 1993
compared to $5.9 million in fiscal 1992. The decrease primarily reflects the
absence of $1.7 million of interest associated with $8.4 million of
Subordinated Debentures exchanged for Class A Common Stock in the first
quarter of fiscal 1993, the use of proceeds from the Company's April 1993
public offering of Class A Common Stock to repay debt under the Company's
senior bank credit facility and the remaining Subordinated Debentures and the
capitalization of $0.8 million of interest in 1993 associated with the
Company's construction of wagering systems equipment. Partly offsetting these
reductions was interest associated with the convertible subordinated
debentures issued in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1993.
Other income in fiscal 1992 included a $3.0 million one-time gain associated
with an insurance claim.
Income Taxes
Effective income tax rates were approximately 12% for fiscal 1993 and 16% in
fiscal 1992. The rate for 1993 differs from the U.S. statutory tax rate of 34%
principally due to foreign earnings taxed at a lower income tax rate than the
U.S. tax rate, the utilization of foreign tax credit and other business
credits in 1993 and adjustments to prior years income tax accruals. The rate
for 1992 differs from the U.S. statutory rate principally due to the
nontaxable portion of the gain related to an insurance claim.
Net Earnings
Net earnings for fiscal 1993 were $9.4 million or $0.33 per share compared
to net earnings of $5.7 million or $0.37 per share in fiscal 1992. Without
giving effect to the insurance claim, net earnings for fiscal 1992 were
26
<PAGE>
$2.7 million or $0.18 per share. Per share earnings were calculated using 28.2
million weighted average shares outstanding in fiscal 1993 compared to 15.4
million weighted average shares outstanding in fiscal 1992. The weighted
average shares outstanding for 1992 and 1993 have been adjusted for 3-for-2
and 2-for-1 stock splits which occurred during 1993.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In fiscal 1994 the Company invested $43.4 million in expenditures for
wagering systems including $3.7 million in digital simulcasting equipment
associated with the acquisition of Marvin H. Sugarman Productions. The Company
also invested $19.5 million in capital expenditures, including $13.8 million
in capital expenditures for major simulcasting facilities in Windsor Locks and
New Haven, Connecticut, $800,000 on the construction of facilities in Las
Vegas and the balance principally attributable to leasehold improvements and
equipment. In fiscal 1994, net cash provided by operating activities was $6.4
million which includes increases in accounts receivable of $17.6 million and
prepaid expenses of $2.5 million, offset by increases in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities of $6.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively. The
Company generated cash of $38.2 million from non-cash charges for
restructuring, depreciation and amortization, the one-time write-off of
financing charges and restructuring, and asset write-downs. During the period,
the Company financed its expenditures through cash flow from operations and
borrowings under its senior credit facility.
As previously announced, on November 1, 1994 the Company acquired 80% of the
holding company of SEPMO S.A. ("SEPMO"), a supplier of wagering systems and
services to the French off-track betting network and other customers, for
approximately $2.3 million. The Company also agreed to purchase the remaining
capital stock of SEPMO in four equal installments over a period of four years
at a purchase price to be determined by a formula based on the results of
operations of SEPMO on a consolidated basis; provided that the aggregate
purchase price for such additional shares will be at least the equivalent of 3
million French francs and not in excess of the equivalent of 9 million French
francs. SEPMO provides wagering systems in France as well as the Middle East
and North Africa. Additionally, on January 19, 1995 the Company acquired
substantially all of the assets of the Simulcast Division of LDDS Corporation
(formerly the IDB Communications Group, Inc.) ("IDB") for $9.0 million in
cash. The Company also acquired the rights and obligations under leases
relating to eight C-band satellite transponders for $4.5 million in cash. The
Company financed the cash portion of the acquisitions of SEPMO and IDB through
borrowings under its senior credit facility.
For fiscal 1995, the Company intends to bid on upcoming lottery contracts in
North America. These lottery contracts and any North American OTB
privatization or start up awards received by the Company would be capital
intensive, requiring substantial initial cash outlays which would be recouped
over time from cash flows from the contracts.
The amount of the Company's future capital expenditures for wagering systems
equipment and lottery equipment will depend on the Company's ability to enter
into service contracts with new customers. Each new customer may require the
manufacture and assembly of a new wagering system. The Company may be required
to begin manufacture of wagering systems prior to the award of a contract in a
competitive bidding situation. The Company anticipates total expenditures of
approximately $15.0 million in fiscal 1995 for wagering systems arising out of
current commitments. At October 31, 1994, the Company's cash and cash
equivalents were $6.7 million, versus $10.5 million at October 31, 1993. At
October 31, 1994, $22.4 million was unused under the Company's senior bank
credit facility. As of October 31, 1994, the Company was in violation of
certain covenants under the senior bank credit facility, as described below.
In addition, the Company was in violation of certain covenants during the
first quarter of fiscal 1995. On February 21, 1995, BT and the participating
banks amended the senior bank credit facility, as described below, to amend
certain covenants and waive these convenant defaults, as a result of which the
Company was in compliance with the senior bank credit facility and,
accordingly, $9.8 million was available for borrowing on that date. The
Company's equipment sales customers fund portions of required expenditures in
the form of advance payments.
27
<PAGE>
In December 1994, the Company signed a preliminary agreement to acquire an
88% interest in certain gaming and information technology assets of
Elettronica Ingegneria Sistemi S.p.A ("EIS"), a designer and developer of
integrated computer and communications networks, and pari-mutuel and lottery
software applications in Italy, for $9.7 million in cash, $1.5 million in
promissory notes, shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock valued at $1.4
million and the assumption of certain loan obligations of EIS. The acquisition
is subject to approval by the Italian government and satisfaction of other
conditions. It is anticipated that the acquisition of EIS will be consummated
in the second half of fiscal 1995; the Company expects to finance this
acquisition with proceeds from future financings. However, there can be no
assurance that the transaction will be consummated or that the Company will be
able to obtain the requisite financing.
The Company believes that operating cash flow, advance payments from
customers and borrowings under the Company's senior credit facility will be
sufficient to satisfy the Company's anticipated capital needs through fiscal
1995, except with respect to the EIS acquisition. In addition, the Company
intends to refinance debt outstanding under its senior credit facility to more
closely match the useful lives of its wagering systems assets with the terms
of its borrowings. The Company is exploring financing alternatives, including
an offering of subordinated debentures to institutional investors. However,
there can be no assurance that such an offering, if commenced, would be
successful. The Company anticipates that the amount of its senior credit
facility will be reduced to $75 million if such an offering were consummated.
BANK CREDIT AGREEMENTS
On April 28, 1994, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary ("Systems") entered
into an Amended and Restated Bank Credit Agreement (the "senior bank credit
facility") with Bankers Trust Company ("BT") which provided for a replacement
$125.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a $25.0 million
sublimit for letters of credit. The amount of the senior bank credit facility
will be reduced by $25.0 million on April 30, 1996 unless the Company has
raised, prior to that date, at least $50.0 million through the issuance of
securities. In connection with any future debt offerings with proceeds to the
Company exceeding $75 million, however, it is anticipated that the senior bank
credit facility would be amended to reduce total availability under the
facility to $75.0 million and to terminate the Revolving B and C Facilities,
which are described below. The senior bank credit facility contains various
financial and other covenants, including limitations on the Company's
acquisitions, indebtedness, investments and capital expenditures. Also, in
addition to customary events of default, a Change of Control of the Company
(as defined) constitutes an event of default under the senior bank credit
facility. The senior bank credit facility contains various other covenants,
including covenants that prohibit the payment of cash dividends on the
Company's stock and distributions to stockholders. The senior bank credit
facility is guaranteed by the Company and other subsidiaries and is secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Company and other subsidiaries. At the
closing, the Company paid BT a closing fee equal of 1.625% of the total amount
of the facility. Loans under the senior credit facility bear interest at the
Base Rate (as defined); 7.75% at October 31, 1994, plus a margin ranging from
0% to .75%, or the Eurodollar Rate (as defined); 5.1875 at October 31, 1994,
plus a margin ranging from .75% to 1.75% per year, in each case depending on
the Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA") to interest expense ratio and indebtedness to EBITDA ratio, and in
all cases an additional 2% in the event of certain defaults. A commitment fee
of 0.5% per year is payable on the unused amount under the senior credit
facility which is subject to reduction if certain financial ratios are met. A
letter of credit fee equal to the applicable margin on Eurodollar loans then
in effect less 1/8 of 1% and a facing fee of 1/8 of 1% per year is payable on
each letter of credit issued, provided that the minimum amount of the facing
fee in any 12 month period is $500. The senior credit facility permits
voluntary prepayments, and requires prepayments under certain specified
circumstances. The obligations under the senior credit facility mature on
April 30, 1999.
Effective December 27, 1994, the Company entered into an amendment to the
senior bank credit facility pursuant to which BT committed to provide an
additional revolving loan facility under the senior bank credit facility in
the amount of $10 million (the "Revolving B Facility"), and subject to the
discretion of BT after the delivery of the Company's audited consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1994,
28
<PAGE>
an additional facility in the amount of $10 million (the "Revolving C
Facility" and, collectively the "Additional Facilities"). No borrowings under
the Additional Facilities may be incurred until the availability under the
existing senior bank credit facility has been fully utilized. Borrowings under
the Revolving B Facility may be incurred from time to time on and after
January 1, 1995 and prior to June 30, 1995. The obligations under the
Revolving B Facility mature December 31, 1995. The obligations under the
Revolving C Facility, if any, mature in April 1999. Borrowings under the
Additional Facilities are subject to the covenants and other conditions,
including interest rate and commitment fees, contained in the senior bank
credit facility. Proceeds of borrowings under the Additional Facilities may be
used solely for the Company's working capital purposes. On the effective date
of the Additional Facilities, the Company paid to BT a financing fee equal to
3/4 of 1% of $20 million. On the first incurrence of borrowings under the
Revolving B Loan Facility, BT earned a financing fee equal to 3/4 of 1% of $10
million. On the first incurrence of borrowings under the Revolving C Facility,
if any, the Company will be obligated to pay BT a financing fee equal to 3/4
of 1% of $10 million. Additionally, on the effective date of the Additional
Facilities the Company paid to BT for distribution to the other banks lending
under the senior bank credit facility 1/8 of 1% of $125 million.
Effective February 21, 1995, the Company entered into an amendment (the
"Amendment") to the senior bank credit facility which amended certain
financial covenants, waived certain covenant defaults and provided that the
senior bank credit facility will bear interest at the Base Rate (as defined)
plus a margin ranging from .25% to 1.25%, or the Eurodollar Rate (as defined)
plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.25%, in each case depending on the
Company's EBITDA to interest expense ratio and bank debt to EBITDA ratio, and
in all cases an additional 2% in the event of certain defaults. On the
effective date of the Amendment, the Company paid to BT for distribution to
the participating banks, 1/2 of 1% of the outstanding commitment of such banks
on that date.
Autotote Worldwide Services Ltd., an Irish corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, had a $250,000 short term loan outstanding as of
October 31, 1994. The Company expects this subsidiary to enter into a line of
credit during the second quarter of fiscal 1995.
In connection with the construction of its Las Vegas facility, in October,
1994 Autotote CBS, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company ("ACBS"), entered into a $2.1 million construction loan with Prime
Merit Bank (the "ACBS Loan"). The ACBS Loan bears interest at 1.5% above prime
rate and contains an option for permanent financing of up to $2.1 million. The
ACBS Loan is secured by a first deed of trust and is guaranteed by the
Company.
DEBENTURES
On August 20, 1993 the Company issued $40.0 million principal amount of 5
1/2% convertible subordinated debentures due 2001 (the "Debentures") in a
private placement. The Debentures are convertible into 2,000,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock at a conversion price of $20.00 per share. Interest is
payable on the Debentures semi-annually. The Debentures are redeemable at par,
including accrued interest thereon, at the option of the Company, at any time
after August 15, 1998, or, under certain circumstances, August 15, 1997. The
Debentures rank subordinate in right of payment to Senior Indebtedness of the
Company (as defined). In the event of a Risk Event (as defined), the holders
of the Debentures may require the Company to purchase all outstanding
Debentures at par, including any accrued interest thereon.
FIRST QUARTER FISCAL 1995
The delays in the start up of certain international contracts and in buying
decisions of other international customers will adversely affect the results
of the first quarter of fiscal 1995. For this reason and because of the
seasonality of the Company's wagering systems business, the Company expects to
report a loss for the first quarter of fiscal 1995.
29
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FORM 10-K
(PAGE)
---------
<S> <C>
Independent Auditors' Report......................................... 32
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 1993 and 1994.......... 33
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31,
1992, 1993 and 1994................................................. 34
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency) for the
years ended October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994......................... 35
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31,
1992, 1993 and 1994................................................. 36
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................... 38
Schedule:
VIII. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.............................. 59
</TABLE>
All other schedules are omitted as the required information is not applicable
or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or
related notes.
30
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
OCTOBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND 1994
(WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT THEREON)
31
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Autotote Corporation:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Autotote
Corporation and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying
index. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Autotote
Corporation and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1993 and 1994, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-
year period ended October 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company and certain of its officers and directors have been named as
defendants in lawsuits commenced in February 1995 as class actions in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaints
allege violation of the federal securities laws. The ultimate outcome of the
lawsuits cannot presently be determined. Accordingly, no provision for any
liability, if any, that may result from the litigation has been recognized in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 1994 the
Company changed its method of accounting for income taxes.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 21, 1995
32
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
OCTOBER 31, 1993 AND 1994 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1994
-------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 10,524 6,743
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $974 and $498 in 1993 and 1994, respectively. 17,912 34,476
Income tax receivable..................................... -- 579
Inventories............................................... 13,616 10,346
Prepaid, deposits and other............................... 2,745 4,672
-------- -------
Total current assets.................................... 44,797 56,816
-------- -------
Property and equipment, at cost............................. 102,224 162,531
Less accumulated depreciation............................. 29,394 41,144
-------- -------
Net property and equipment.............................. 72,830 121,387
-------- -------
Goodwill, less amortization................................. 28,502 23,052
Operating right, less amortization.......................... 19,833 18,933
Other assets and investments................................ 21,143 25,666
-------- -------
$187,105 245,854
======== =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and other short-term borrowings............. $ 1,034 250
Current installments of long-term debt.................... 725 792
Accounts payable.......................................... 12,806 19,199
Accrued liabilities....................................... 11,136 17,164
Income taxes payable...................................... 2,460 3,548
-------- -------
Total current liabilities............................... 28,161 40,953
-------- -------
Deferred income taxes....................................... 4,380 3,650
Other long-term liabilities................................. 2,223 2,367
Long-term debt, excluding current installments.............. 36,262 103,163
Long-term debt, convertible subordinated debentures ........ 40,000 40,000
-------- -------
Total liabilities....................................... 111,026 190,133
-------- -------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 2,000
authorized, none outstanding............................. -- --
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 99,300
share authorized, 27,901 and 28,748 shares outstanding at
October 31, 1993 and 1994 respectively................... 279 288
Class B non-voting common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, 700 shares authorized, none outstanding........... -- --
Additional paid-in capital................................ 133,390 134,864
Accumulated deficit....................................... (57,430) (79,580)
Translation adjustment.................................... (160) 149
-------- -------
Total stockholders' equity.............................. 76,079 55,721
-------- -------
Commitments and contingencies (notes 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 18
and 22).................................................... $187,105 245,854
======== =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
33
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND 1994
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1993 1994
------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating revenues:
Wagering systems.................................. $40,526 59,792 98,592
Wagering equipment and other sales................ 7,838 25,070 50,458
------- ------ -------
48,364 84,862 149,050
------- ------ -------
Operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown below):
Wagering systems.................................. 20,713 36,513 61,158
Inventory, equipment and contract adjustments..... -- -- 3,939
Strike expenses................................... -- -- 2,842
Wagering equipment and other sales................ 4,606 11,679 35,753
------- ------ -------
25,319 48,192 103,692
------- ------ -------
Total gross profit.............................. 23,045 36,670 45,358
------- ------ -------
Selling, general and administrative expenses........ 6,419 10,956 25,298
Write off of investments and other.................. -- -- 4,737
Restructuring....................................... -- -- 3,839
Depreciation and amortization....................... 7,840 11,809 25,418
------- ------ -------
Operating income (loss)......................... 8,786 13,905 (13,934)
------- ------ -------
Other (income) deductions
Interest expense.................................. 5,903 3,473 6,408
Interest income................................... (99) (233) (305)
Other income ..................................... (869) (65) (647)
Proceeds from insurance claim .................... (3,000) -- --
------- ------ -------
1,935 3,175 5,456
------- ------ -------
Earnings (loss) before income taxes (benefit) and
extraordinary item............................... 6,851 10,730 (19,390)
------- ------ -------
Income taxes (benefit).............................. 1,124 1,292 (1,462)
------- ------ -------
Net earnings (loss) before extraordinary item... $ 5,727 9,438 (17,928)
------- ------ -------
Extraordinary item
Write off of financing fees and expenses.......... -- -- 4,222
------- ------ -------
Net earnings (loss)............................. $ 5,727 9,438 (22,150)
======= ====== =======
Earnings (loss) per common share
Primary earnings (loss) per common share before
extraordinary item............................... $ 0.37 0.33 (0.64)
Extraordinary item
Write off of financing fees and expenses.......... -- -- (0.15)
------- ------ -------
Earnings (loss) per common share.................... $ 0.37 0.33 (0.79)
======= ====== =======
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(primary).......................................... 15,425 28,210 28,174
======= ====== =======
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per common share
before extraordinary item........................ $ 0.36 0.33 (0.64)
Extraordinary item
Write off of financing fees and expenses.......... -- -- (0.15)
------- ------ -------
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per common share...... $0 .36 0.33 (0.79)
======= ====== =======
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(fully diluted).................................... 15,911 28,911 28,174
======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
34
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND 1994
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EQUITY
ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT TOTAL
PREFERRED COMMON PAID-IN ACCUMULATED FROM TREASURY STOCKHOLDERS'
STOCK STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT TRANSLATION STOCK EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
--------- ------ ---------- ----------- ----------- -------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances, October 31,
1991................... $ 4 175 48,467 (72,549) -- (4,872) (28,775)
Exercise of stock
options................ -- -- 1 -- -- 7 8
Conversion of
Subordinated Notes..... -- 3 877 -- -- -- 880
Dividends on Series B
Preferred Stock........ -- -- -- (38) -- -- (38)
Issuance of warrants.... -- -- 1,225 -- -- -- 1,225
Capital contributions... -- -- 1 -- -- -- 1
Net earnings............ -- -- -- 5,727 -- -- 5,727
--- --- ------- ------- ---- ------ -------
Balances, October 31,
1992................... 4 178 50,571 (66,860) -- (4,865) (20,972)
Exercise of stock
options................ -- 1 232 -- -- 154 387
Issuance of Common Stock
in exchange for
Subordinated
Debentures............. -- -- 5,958 -- -- 3,009 8,967
Conversion of Series B
Preferred Stock........ (4) -- (123) -- -- 127 --
Dividends on Series B
Preferred Stock........ -- -- -- (8) -- -- (8)
Exercise of Warrants.... -- 21 1,620 -- -- -- 1,641
Issuance of Class A
Common Stock, net of
expenses incurred...... -- 79 75,132 -- -- 1,575 76,786
Currency translation
adjustment............. -- -- -- -- (160) -- (160)
Net earnings............ -- -- -- 9,438 -- -- 9,438
--- --- ------- ------- ---- ------ -------
Balances, October 31,
1993................... -- 279 133,390 (57,430) (160) -- 76,079
--- --- ------- ------- ---- ------ -------
Exercise of stock
options................ -- 4 1,398 -- -- -- 1,402
Exercise of Warrants.... -- 5 76 -- -- -- 81
Currency translation
adjustment............. -- -- -- -- 309 -- 309
Net loss................ -- -- -- (22,150) -- -- (22,150)
--- --- ------- ------- ---- ------ -------
Balances, October 31,
1994................... $-- 288 134,864 (79,580) 149 -- 55,721
=== === ======= ======= ==== ====== =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND 1994
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1993 1994
-------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)............................. $ 5,727 9,438 (22,150)
-------- -------- -------
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to
cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization................... 7,840 11,809 25,418
Write off of non-cash financing fees............ -- -- 4,222
Non-cash restructuring and asset write-offs..... -- -- 8,576
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)........... 505 (785) (2,292)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities net
of effects of purchase/disposition of
subsidiaries
Accounts receivable......................... (1,764) (9,285) (17,560)
Inventories................................. (15,189) 2,387 184
Prepaids, deposits and other................ (373) (1,287) (2,506)
Accounts payable............................ 4,109 2,727 6,393
Accrued liabilities......................... (803) 980 5,800
Income taxes payable........................ 243 1,012 1,088
Other .......................................... 1,134 (2,674) (808)
-------- -------- -------
Total adjustments........................... (4,298) 4,884 28,515
-------- -------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities......... 1,429 14,322 6,365
-------- -------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures............................ (628) (3,277) (19,533)
Expenditures for equipment under wagering
systems contracts ............................. -- (46,500) (43,401)
Increase in other assets and investments........ (5,928) (6,467) (15,450)
Increase in goodwill............................ (221) -- (350)
Payment for operating right..................... -- (20,000) --
Purchase of companies, net of cash acquired .... -- (34,653) --
-------- -------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities............. (6,777) (110,897) (78,734)
-------- -------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net borrowings (repayment) under lines-of-
credit......................................... 1,309 (1,417) (474)
Net borrowings under senior bank credit
facility....................................... -- -- 101,448
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt........ 5,668 86,054 17,556
Payments on long-term debt...................... (3,378) (57,554) (51,562)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock...... 8 78,815 1,483
Dividends paid.................................. -- (8) --
-------- -------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities......... 3,607 105,890 68,451
-------- -------- -------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash........... -- 3 137
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.. (1,741) 9,318 (3,781)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year...... 2,947 1,206 10,524
-------- -------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year ........... $ 1,206 10,524 6,743
======== ======== =======
</TABLE>
(Continued)
36
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND 1994
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
1992
Net transfers of inventory to property and equipment were $5,566,000. See
notes 10 and 15 for a description of other non-cash investing and financing
activities during 1992.
1993
See notes 8 and 10 for a description of capital lease transactions and the
exchange of subordinated debentures for common stock.
1994
Net transfers from goodwill to property and equipment were $6,751,000 in
accordance with finalization of purchase price allocations for the 1993
acquisitions. See notes 3 and 8 for a description of acquisitions and capital
lease transactions.
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid during the year for (thousands of dollars):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
------------------
1992 1993 1994
------ ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest (net of interest capitalized of $819 and
$1,113 in 1993 and 1994, respectively)............... $5,695 3,139 4,979
Income taxes.......................................... $ 395 852 2,386
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER 31, 1993 AND 1994
(1) Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Description of the Business
The Company and its subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the design,
manufacture, sale and operation of computerized wagering systems for
pari-mutuel wagering, sports/race wagering, simulcasting services and
lottery applications in the United States and internationally as well
as the operation of certain off-track betting concerns in the United
States and internationally.
During fiscal year 1994, the Company acquired Marvin Sugarman
Productions, Inc. and its affiliate, Racing Technology, Inc. (See Note
3).
During fiscal year 1993, the Company acquired certain businesses and an
operating right, including the ETAG Group, the Tele Control Group, the
on-line lottery business of General Instrument Corporation and the
exclusive right to operate the Connecticut Off-track Betting system
(See Note 3).
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of Autotote Corporation (the Company) and subsidiaries in which the
Company's ownership is greater than 50%. Investments in other entities
are accounted for principally on the equity basis. Under the equity
method, investments are stated at cost plus the Company's equity in
undistributed earnings after acquisition.
All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
(c) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM COST METHOD
---- -----------
<C> <S>
Parts.................. First-in, first-out or weighted moving average.
Work-in-process........ Specific identification or weighted moving
average for direct material and labor; other
fixed and variable production costs are
allocated as a percentage of direct labor cost.
Ticket paper and other. First-in, first-out
</TABLE>
The Company adjusts inventory accounts on a periodic basis to reflect the
impact of potential obsolescence.
(d) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation of property and
equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED LIFE
ITEM IN YEARS
---- --------------
<S> <C>
Machinery and Equipment.................................. 3-7
Buildings................................................ 15-40
Transportation........................................... 3-7
Furniture and Fixtures................................... 5-10
Building and leasehold improvements...................... 5-30
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(e) Income Taxes
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," effective November 1, 1993. The
new standard replaces SFAS No. 96, which the Company adopted
previously.
The cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 109 is immaterial since the
recognized benefit of deferred tax assets for the Company remains
unchanged from SFAS No. 96. Prior period financial statements have not
been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 109.
Under SFAS No. 109, income taxes are calculated using the asset and
liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income
taxes are calculated by applying enacted statutory tax rates to
cumulative temporary differences between financial statement carrying
amounts and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Under SFAS
No. 109, the effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
(f) Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Earnings (Loss) per common share are based on the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and the
dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and other common stock
equivalents. Common stock equivalents are not included in the
calculation of loss per share since their inclusion would be
antidilutive.
(g) Effect of Stock Splits
All information referring to shares of Class A Common Stock or common
stock equivalents, earnings per share, and other related information
has been adjusted to reflect the effects of the Company's three-for-two
and two-for-one stock splits in the form of stock dividends, effected
on June 30, 1993 and October 25, 1993, respectively.
(h) Revenue Recognition
Revenue from major contracts for the sale of wagering systems are
recognized concurrent with achieving specified milestones in connection
with the contract. Revenue for contracted software development is
recognized on the percentage of completion method based on the ratio of
costs incurred to the total estimated cost. Any anticipated losses on
fixed price contracts are charged to earnings when such losses can be
estimated. Revenues arising from the sale of component equipment and
supplies is recognized when earned.
Revenues from wagering system service, simulcast and lottery service
contracts are recognized over the contract period pursuant to the terms
of the contracts. Costs of providing operating services under contracts
are charged to earnings in the period incurred.
Revenue from the operation of off-track betting concerns is recognized
based on a percentage of amounts wagered.
The Company recognizes revenue from software licenses upon delivery if
there are no, or insignificant, post-delivery obligations, and if the
terms of the agreement are such that the payment obligation is non-
cancelable and non-refundable.
39
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(i) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair
value of the net assets of acquired companies. The excess of costs over
net assets for the Company's Autotote Lottery, Tele Control and ETAG
subsidiaries is being amortized on a straight-line basis over five,
seven, and ten years, respectively. The balance of goodwill is being
amortized over forty years. Total goodwill amounted to $ 28,502,000 and
$23,052,000 net of accumulated amortization of $175,000 and $3,740,000
as of October 31, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
The Company assesses the recoverability of goodwill by comparing the
recorded amounts to anticipated undiscounted future operating cash
flows of the acquired operations and other considerations. The amount
of impairment of goodwill, if any, is measured based on projected
future operating cash flows using a discount rate reflecting the
Company's average cost of funds.
(j) Operating Right
On July 1, 1993, the Company acquired the exclusive right to operate
the Connecticut off-track betting system. This operating right is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over twenty years and amounted to
$19,833,000 and $18,933,000 net of accumulated amortization of $167,000
and $1,162,000 as of October 31, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
(k) Other Assets and Investments (See Note 6)
The Company has capitalized certain costs associated with internally
developed software to be sold, leased or otherwise marketed. In
addition, the Company has purchased software from, or contracted with,
outside suppliers for the development of certain software products, and
has also allocated certain costs to software as the result of business
acquisitions in prior years. The software costs are being amortized on
a straight-line basis over their useful lives, which range from three
to five years. Amortization expense was $185,000, $456,000 and $956,000
for the years ended October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
The Company has capitalized certain costs associated with product
development which amount to $6,012,000 in 1994 primarily related to
lottery and video lottery systems and $2,417,000 in 1993 primarily
related to the MAX 6000 terminals and lottery systems. The capitalized
product development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over a
period of five years. Amortization expense of capitalized product
development was $26,000, $302,000 and $1,289,000 for the years ended
October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
Deferred financing costs relate to those costs associated with the
procurement of long term financing by the Company. Such costs are
amortized over the life of the financing agreements. Amortization
expense was, $305,000, $475,000 and $534,000 for the years ended
October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
In 1994, the Company wrote off $4.2 million of deferred financing fees
and expenses associated with the Company's repayment of its prior
senior credit facility with Heller Financial Group, Inc.
Other intangible assets represent costs allocated to patents,
trademarks, marketing rights and non-competition and employment
agreements arising primarily from business acquisitions. The remaining
assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, which is approximately six years.
Amortization expense was $116,000, $273,000 and $1,026,000 for the
years ended October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
40
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(l) Deferred Installation Costs
Certain installation costs consisting of installation materials, lease
modification costs, customer contracted software and installation
labor, associated with leased systems are deferred and amortized over
the lives of the leases unless such costs are reimbursed by the lessee,
in which case such amounts are included in revenue and cost of sales.
Deferred installation costs, net of accumulated depreciation, included
in property and equipment were approximately $9,226,000 and $12,926,000
at October 31, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
(m) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an
original maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
(n) Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at year-end
rates of exchange and operations are translated at the average rates of
exchange for the year. Gains or losses resulting from translating the
foreign currency financial statements are accumulated as a separate
component of stockholders' equity. Gains or losses resulting from
foreign currency transactions are included in other income (deductions)
in the consolidated statements of operations.
(o) Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years
consolidated financial statements to conform to the current
presentation.
(2) Unusual Items
During 1994, the Company recognized unusual charges of $15.2 million.
These charges include $3.9 million principally for corrections
consisting of inventory, equipment and contract adjustments of which
$3.3 million is in connection with the acquisition of MHSP and RTI,
(see Note 3); $2.8 million for costs incurred as a result of a strike
by the field service employees of the Company's subsidiary, Autotote
Systems, Inc.; $4.7 million for the write-off of certain assets
principally related to domestic and overseas projects; and charges of
$3.8 million resulting from closing the Company's Newark, Delaware
manufacturing facility and the discontinuation of certain product
lines.
(3) Acquisitions
1994
On July 20, 1994, Marvin H. Sugarman Productions, Inc. (MHSP) and Racing
Technology, Inc. (RTI) were acquired in an exchange of 500,000 shares of the
Company's Class A Common Stock for all of the outstanding shares of MHSP and
RTI. The transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests and,
accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
restated to include the accounts and operations of MHSP and RTI for all
periods prior to the acquisition.
Prior to the acquisition, MHSP and RTI used the calendar year as their
respective fiscal years. The financial results of MHSP and RTI were conformed
to the fiscal year end of the Company as part of the restatement.
41
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Separate results of the combining companies and the combined amounts are
summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31,
------------------------
1992 1993
------------ -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Net Revenues........................................
Autotote.......................................... $42,804 79,478
MHSP & RTI........................................ 5,560 5,384
------------ -----------
combined........................................ $48,364 84,862
============ ===========
Net Earnings
Autotote.......................................... $ 5,116 9,020
MHSP & RTI........................................ 611 418
------------ -----------
combined........................................ $ 5,727 9,438
============ ===========
</TABLE>
1993
In 1993, the Company made several acquisitions. At October 31, 1993 the
allocations of the purchase prices were based on preliminary estimates. The
excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets
acquired based on the preliminary estimates of allocation of purchase price
for each acquisition was being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40
years. During 1994, the allocations of the purchase prices were finalized and
the useful life of the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair
value of the net assets acquired was determined.
On June 22, 1993, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of ETAG
Electronic Totalisator Gesellschaft m.b.H. and its affiliated companies (the
ETAG Group). The ETAG Group leases wagering systems to harness racetracks in
Germany and Austria and provides maintenance services to customers on a per
diem basis. In addition, the ETAG Group sells computerized wagering systems to
third parties, holds a 50% interest in a joint venture which operates off-
track betting parlors in Germany and held a 25% investment in the Tele Control
Group (a provider of on-line lottery systems) which was subsequently acquired.
The Company paid an aggregate purchase price of $10,550,000 in cash, and
agreed to pay 10% (or 5% in certain cases) of the net increase in revenues on
a consolidated basis for the members of the ETAG Group for the calendar years
1993 through 1995, with payment to be made following the end of the respective
calendar year. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method;
accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities have been
recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition with a
portion of the purchase price being allocated to property and equipment. The
excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets
acquired is being amortized on a straight-line basis over ten years (See Note
1 (i)). The operating results of the ETAG Group have been included in the
consolidated statement of operations since the date of acquisition.
On June 25, 1993, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of
General Instrument Lottery Corporation (Autotote Lottery) for $7,825,000 in
cash. Autotote Lottery generally conducts business under one of three
contractual arrangements: operating contracts, in which it provides personnel,
equipment and services while retaining ownership of the equipment; technical
and software support contracts, in which it provides certain services but
sells the equipment; and sales contracts, in which it sells the equipment for
a fixed price, without providing personnel and services. The acquisition was
accounted for using the purchase method; accordingly, the assets and
liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of
acquisition with a portion of the purchase price being allocated to property
and equipment. The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of
the net assets acquired is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 5
years (See Note 1 (i)). The operating results of Autotote Lottery have been
included in the consolidated statement of operations since the date of
acquisition.
42
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
On September 8, 1993, the Company acquired 73% of the Tele Control Group
from several individuals in addition to the 25% interest in the Tele Control
Group which the Company acquired as a result of its acquisition of the ETAG
Group. The Tele Control Group develops high volume transaction processing
programs principally for on-line lotteries and other wagering applications,
and to a lesser extent, for banking and credit card applications, and provides
related software support. The Company paid a purchase price of $17,500,000 in
cash at the closing. In March 1994, the Company acquired the remaining 2%
interest in Tele Control for a $123,000 cash purchase price. In 1994, the
Company made an additional contingent cash payment of $7,500,000 based on the
signing of certain lottery contracts. Accordingly, this payment has been
identified to these contracts and classified as operating expense in the
accompanying statement of operations. The acquisition was accounted for using
the purchase method; accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired
entities have been recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of
acquisition. The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of the
net assets acquired is being amortized on a straight-line basis over seven
years. (See Note 1(i)). The operating results of the Tele Control Group have
been included in the consolidated statement of operations since the date of
acquisition.
The following table presents unaudited pro forma results of operations as if
the 1993 acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented.
These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes and do not
purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisitions been
made at the beginning of fiscal year 1993 or of results which may occur in the
future. These pro forma results also do not reflect the 1994 acquisition of
MHSP and RTI, accounted for as a pooling of interests.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31
-----------------------
1992 1993
----------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Thousands of dollars, except per share data
Revenue............................................... $65,582 93,863
Operating Income...................................... 8,909 15,845
Earnings before income taxes.......................... 5,040 11,084
Primary earnings per common share..................... $ 0.31 0.35
</TABLE>
(4) Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
--------------
1993 1994
------- ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Parts......................................................... $ 9,230 3,579
Work-in-process............................................... 3,721 5,887
Finished goods................................................ -- 443
------- ------
12,951 9,909
Ticket paper.................................................. 665 437
------- ------
$13,616 10,346
======= ======
</TABLE>
Prior to 1993, the Company utilized inventory accounts to accumulate all
costs associated with the production of its products. During 1993, the Company
began to identify the association between production assembly jobs and
specific wagering systems contracts. For financial reporting purposes, at
October 31, 1993 and 1994, costs for equipment associated with specific
wagering systems contracts not yet placed in service are
43
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
recorded as construction in progress. When the equipment is placed in service
at wagering facilities, the related costs are transferred from construction in
progress to machinery and equipment.
Under wagering systems contracts, the Company retains ownership of all
equipment located at wagering facilities.
(5) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
----------------
1993 1994
-------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Machinery and equipment..................................... $ 86,033 126,357
Land and buildings.......................................... 2,377 15,425
Transportation.............................................. 424 543
Furniture and fixtures...................................... 1,825 2,742
Leasehold improvements...................................... 159 889
Construction in progress.................................... 11,406 16,575
-------- -------
$102,224 162,531
======== =======
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense for the years ended October 31, 1992, 1993, and 1994
amounted to $7,349,000, $10,278,000 and $14,256,000 respectively.
Interest costs of $819,000 and $1,113,000 were capitalized in 1993 and 1994
as additional costs of qualifying property during the construction period and
are included in the caption machinery and equipment.
(6) Other Assets and Investments
Other assets and investments (net) consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
--------------
1993 1994
------- ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Software costs................................................ $ 4,835 3,687
Deferred financing costs...................................... 3,681 2,338
Product development costs..................................... 3,281 9,804
Other intangible assets....................................... 3,829 5,190
Other assets.................................................. 5,517 4,647
------- ------
$21,143 25,666
======= ======
</TABLE>
Other assets are principally comprised of prepaid expenses with a maturity
in excess of one year, costs associated with various product prototypes and
costs associated with start-up of operations.
(7) Related Party Transactions
Management and consulting services provided by a director/stockholder who
was acting Chief Executive Officer of either the Company or a subsidiary of
the Company from August 1990 through October 1991, and who became Chief
Executive Officer of the Company in April 1992, amounted to $120,000 for the
year ended
44
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
October 31, 1992. In addition, rental payments for office space to the same
individual were $46,000 in 1992, and $93,000 in 1993.
As a result of the acquisition of Tele Control, the Company has assumed a
contract with IMMOC leasing, a real estate concern substantially owned by
certain employees of the Company, to rent premises for a minimum period of 15
years. Consequently the Company has annual rental commitments of approximately
$540,000 through the year 2006. Rental payments made to this concern were
$24,000 and $433,000 for the years ended October 31, 1993 and 1994,
respectively. Future minimum lease payments related to this commitment have
been included in Note 8.
In 1994, a director of the Company had a consulting arrangement with the
Company whereby he received $100,000 for consulting services.
In the opinion of management of the Company, the foregoing transactions were
effected at rates which approximate those which the Company would have
realized or incurred had the transactions been effected with independent third
parties.
The Company has a senior bank credit facility with Bankers Trust Company, a
company of which a director of the Company is a managing director.
At October 31, 1993 and 1994, $337,000 and $243,000 was due from DATEK, an
unconsolidated 50% investee of ETAG.
(8) Leases
At October 31, 1994, the Company was obligated under operating leases
covering office equipment, office space and transportation equipment expiring
at various dates through 2006. Future minimum lease payments required under
these leasing arrangements at October 31, 1994 are as follows: 1995,
$3,022,000; 1996, $4,014,000; 1997, $3,920,000; 1998, $3,889,000; 1999,
$3,705,000; and thereafter $5,727,000. The Company also leases equipment as
needed under various month-to-month lease agreements. Total rental expense
under these operating leases was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING
OCTOBER 31,
------------------
1992 1993 1994
---- ------ ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental expense............................................ $265 $1,196 $3,211
---- ------ ------
</TABLE>
The Company entered into capital lease obligations of $1,062,000 and
$587,000 during the years ended October 31, 1993 and 1994 respectively.
(9) Notes Payable and Other Short Term Borrowings
At October 31, 1994, the Company had a short term borrowing in the amount of
$250,000 with a European bank. The facility bears interest at LIBOR
(approximately 5.1875%).
45
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(10) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
----------------
1993 1994
------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
1993 Senior Bank Credit Facility--Note payable under
revolving credit facility due May, 2000, interest payable
from 0.50% to 1.75% above prime rate, secured by the
assets of the Company.................................... $ 474 --
1993 Senior Bank Credit Facility--Note payable under
acquisition / capital equipment credit facility due May,
2000, interest payable at 0.50% to 1.75% above prime
rate, with conversion to a term loan as of June, 1996,
secured by the assets of the Company..................... 33,825 --
Senior bank credit facility, due April 1999, interest
payable at 0% to .75% over prime or .75% to 1.75% of
Eurodollar rate (as defined), secured by the assets of
the Company.............................................. -- 101,448
Irish Development Authority grant, amortized over the life
of acquired capital equipment (generally 5 years)........ -- 82
5.5% subordinated debentures due August, 2001, convertible
into Class A Common Stock at $20.00 per share, interest
due semi-annually commencing February 1994............... 40,000 40,000
Capital lease obligations, due in monthly installments
through January 1999..................................... 1,122 1,386
Commercial Development Revenue Bond, interest payable at
88% of prime rate (7.75% at October 31, 1994), due in
monthly installments of $7,433, plus interest, through
February, 1997, secured by buildings and improvements.... 305 216
Term loan due in monthly installments of $7,912 through
January 1998, interest payable at 2.5% above the prime
rate (7.75% at October 31, 1994), secured by equipment... 411 316
Term loan due in monthly installments of $25,730 through
January 1996, interest payable at 2.5% above the prime
rate (7.75% at October 31, 1994), secured by equipment... 720 412
Note payable--Video equipment vendor, payable in monthly
installments of $2,099 including interest at 11%, due
September 15, 1999....................................... -- 95
Various term loans........................................ 130 --
------- --------
Total long-term debt...................................... 76,987 143,955
Less current installments................................. 725 792
------- --------
Long-term debt, excluding current installments............ $76,262 $143,163
======= ========
</TABLE>
On August 20, 1993 the Company issued $40,000,000 principal amount of 5.5%
convertible subordinated debentures due 2001 (the New Debentures) in a private
placement. The New Debentures are convertible into 2,000,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock at a conversion price of $20.00 per share. $17,500,000 of the
proceeds were used to complete the Tele Control acquisition, $10,000,000 of
the proceeds were applied to borrowings under the senior bank credit facility
and the remainder was used for capital expenditures and other corporate
purposes.
46
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
During 1992, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement for
$204,000 which expires October 5, 1995. Under the agreement, the Company has
protected $20,000,000 of outstanding debt from increases in the U.S. prime
rate (as defined) in excess of 9.0%. At October 31, 1994 the U.S. prime rate
(as defined) was below the cap rate.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 1993, the Company consummated an
Exchange Offer (the Offer) to holders of debentures to exchange their
debentures for Class A Common Stock. Pursuant to the Offer, one share of Class
A Common Stock was issued for each $3.50 of principal amount of, or accrued
and unpaid interest on, the debentures. The holders of approximately
$6,800,000 principal amount of 14% debentures and $1,600,000 of increasing
rate debentures maturing in 1998 exchanged their debentures and accrued
interest of approximately $657,000, for approximately 2,580,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock. The shares could not be resold for one year after the
Offer. This transaction resulted in no gain or loss.
On June 4, 1993, the Company reached agreement with lenders to provide a
senior bank credit facility (the 1993 Senior Bank Credit Facility). The 1993
Senior Bank Credit Facility was scheduled to expire in the year 2000 and
consisted of a $10,000,000 revolving loan (which includes a $6,000,000 letter
of credit facility (the Revolver) and a $40,000,000 revolving
acquisition/capital expenditure facility (the A/CE Facility). Borrowing under
the Revolver was subject to borrowing base limitations based on accounts
receivable and inventory. The 1993 Senior Bank Credit Facility was secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Company and subsidiaries. The 1993 Bank
Senior Credit Facility contained various financial and other covenants,
including covenants that prohibited the payment of cash dividends on the
Company's stock and distributions to stockholders.
On April 28, 1994, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Bank
Credit Agreement (the "senior bank credit facility") with Bankers Trust
Company ("BT") for a $125.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility,
including a $25.0 million sublimit for letters of credit. The facility will be
reduced by $25.0 million on April 30, 1996 unless the Company has raised at
least $50.0 million through the issuance of securities. The senior bank credit
facility contains various financial and other covenants, including limitations
on the Company's acquisitions, indebtedness, investments and capital
expenditures. The senior bank credit facility contains various other
covenants, including covenants that prohibit the payment of cash dividends on
the Company's stock and distributions to stockholders. In addition to
customary events of default, a change of control of the Company (as defined)
constitutes an event of default under the senior bank credit facility. The
senior bank credit facility is guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries
and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and
subsidiaries. The Company paid BT a closing fee equal to 1.625% of the total
amount of the facility. Loans under the senior bank credit facility bear
interest at the Base Rate (as defined) plus a margin ranging from 0% to .75%,
or the Eurodollar Rate (as defined) plus a margin ranging from .75% to 1.75%
per year, in each case depending on the Company's earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") to interest expense ratio and
bank debt to EBITDA ratio, and in all cases an additional 2% in the event of
certain defaults. On October 31, 1994, the Base Rate was 7.5% and the
applicable Eurodollar Rate was 5.1875%. A commitment fee of 0.5% per year is
payable on the unused amount under the senior bank credit facility which is
subject to reduction if certain financial ratios are met. A letter of credit
fee equal to the applicable margin on Eurodollar loans then in effect less 1/8
of 1% and a facing fee of 1/8 of 1% per year is payable on each letter of
credit issued. The senior bank credit facility permits voluntary prepayments,
and requires prepayments under certain specified circumstances. The
obligations under the senior bank credit facility mature on April 30, 1999.
Effective December 27, 1994, the Company entered into an amendment to the
senior bank credit facility pursuant to which BT committed to provide, subject
to certain terms and conditions, two additional revolving loan facilities
under the senior bank credit facility, each in the amount of $10 million (the
"Revolving B Facility" and the "Revolving C Facility" and, collectively, the
"Additional Facilities"). No borrowings under
47
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
the Additional Facilities may be incurred until the availability under the
existing senior bank credit facility has been fully utilized. Borrowings under
the Revolving B Loan Facility may be incurred from time to time on and after
January 1, 1995 and prior to June 30, 1995. The obligations under the
Revolving B Facility mature on December 31, 1995. Availability of the
Revolving C Facility is subject to the discretion of BT after the delivery of
the Company's audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 1994. The obligations under the Revolving C Facility mature
on April 30, 1999. Borrowings under the Additional Facilities are subject to
the covenants and other conditions, including interest rate and commitment
fees, contained in the senior bank credit facility. Proceeds of borrowings
under the Additional Facilities may be used solely for the Company's working
capital purposes. On the effective date of the Additional Facilities, BT
earned a financing fee equal to 3/4 of 1% of $20 million. On the first
incurrence of borrowings under the Revolving B Facility, BT earned a financing
fee equal to 3/4 of 1% of $10 million and on the first incurrence of
borrowings under the Revolving C Facility, the Company will be obligated to
pay BT an additional financing fee equal to 3/4 of 1% of $10 million.
Additionally, on the effective date of the Additional Facilities, the Company
paid to BT, for distribution to the other banks lending under the senior bank
credit facility, 1/8 of 1% of $125 million.
Deferred financing fees associated with the 1993 Senior Bank Credit facility
were charged to expense in 1994 in conjunction with the senior bank credit
facility refinancing. The write-off of these deferred financing fees has been
classified as an extraordinary item in the accompanying statement of
operations.
The Company was in violation of certain covenants of the senior bank credit
facility as of October 31, 1994. On February 21, 1995, the Company entered
into an amendment (the "Amendment") to the senior bank credit facility which
waived the covenant defaults, amended certain financial covenants and
consented to the exclusion of identified non-recurring charges from the
calculation of certain financial ratio covenants namely, minimum net worth and
the relationship of interest expense and borrowings to EBITDA as a result of
which the Company was in compliance with the provisions of the senior bank
credit facility. In consideration of the Amendment the senior bank credit
facility will bear interest at the base rate plus a margin ranging from .25%
to 1.25%, or the Eurodollar Rate, plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.25% in
each case depending on the Company's EBITDA to interest expense ratio and bank
debt to EBITDA ratio, and in all cases an additional 2% in the event of
certain defaults. On the effective date of the Amendment, the Company paid to
BT for distribution to the other banks lending under the senior bank credit
facility 1/2 of 1% of the outstanding commitment of each bank.
As of October 31, 1994, the Company had approximately $22,400,000 available
for borrowing under its senior bank credit facility, and $1,175,000 in
outstanding letters of credit.
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the next five fiscal years
and thereafter are as follows: 1995, $792,000; 1996, $682,000; 1997, $550,000;
1998, $455,000; 1999, $101,476,000; and thereafter, $40,000,000.
48
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(11) Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
The consolidated earnings (loss) before income taxes (benefit) and
extraordinary item, by domestic and foreign source, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31
------------------------
1992 1993 1994
------- ------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Domestic.......................................... $5,584 2,921 (26,090)
Foreign........................................... 1,267 7,809 6,700
------- ------- --------
Consolidated earnings (loss) before income taxes
(benefit) and extraordinary item................. $6,851 10,730 (19,390)
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CURRENT DEFERRED TOTAL
------- -------- ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1992:
Federal........................................... $ 354 548 902
Foreign........................................... 195 (93) 102
State............................................. 62 58 120
------ ------ ------
$ 611 513 1,124
====== ====== ======
1993:
Federal........................................... $ 724 (968) (244)
Foreign........................................... 1,054 199 1,253
State............................................. 283 -- 283
------ ------ ------
$2,061 (769) 1,292
====== ====== ======
1994:
Federal........................................... $ (579) (5,670) (6,249)
Foreign........................................... 1,409 3,378 4,787
State............................................. -- -- --
------ ------ ------
$ 830 (2,292) (1,462)
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
49
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
tax bases of assets and liabilities that give rise to significant portions of
the deferred tax liability (asset) relate to the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
------------------------
1992 1993 1994
------- ------ -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY (ASSET)
Accrued Restructuring Costs..................... $ -- -- (1,326)
Accrued Vacation................................ (281) (377) (566)
Accrued Loss on Contracts....................... -- -- (497)
Inventory Reserve............................... (361) (432) (393)
Other Accrued Liabilities....................... -- -- (798)
Reserve for Doubtful Accounts................... (216) (354) (31)
Other, net...................................... -- -- (149)
------- ------ -------
Current Deferred Tax Asset.................... (858) (1,163) (3,760)
Accrued Foreign Contract Reserve................ -- -- 2,539
------- ------ -------
Current Deferred Tax Asset, Net............... (858) (1,163) (1,221)
======= ====== =======
NONCURRENT DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY (ASSET)
Intangible Assets due to Differences in
Amortization Periods........................... -- -- 102
Intercompany Sales to Affiliates................ -- -- 280
Property and Equipment due to Differences in
Financial Reporting and Tax Depreciation
Methods........................................ 3,422 4,387 8,738
Interest Charge Domestic
International
Sales Corp.................................... 3,777 4,027 4,416
------- ------ -------
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liability, Net........ 7,199 8,414 13,536
------- ------ -------
Net Operating Loss Carry Forward................ (1,065) (1,535) (12,823)
Foreign Tax Credit Carry Forward................ -- (857) (1,030)
Alternative Minimum Tax Credits................. (212) (184)
Research and experimentation credits............ -- (112) (150)
Other, net...................................... (131) (155) (372)
------- ------ -------
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Asset................. (1,196) (2,871) (14,559)
Valuation Allowance........................... -- -- 5,894
------- ------ -------
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Asset, net.............. (1,196) (2,871) (8,665)
------- ------ -------
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liability............... 6,003 5,543 4,871
------- ------ -------
Net Deferred Tax Liability On Balance Sheet..... $ 5,145 4,380 3,650
======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
The aggregate deferred tax assets before valuation allowance at October 31,
1992, 1993, and 1994 were $2,054,000, $4,038,000 and $18,319,000 respectively.
The aggregate deferred tax liabilities at October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994 were
$7,199,000, $8,414,000 and $16,075,000 respectively. Deferred tax liabilities
were increased by $2,955,000 during the year ended October 31, 1994 to reflect
the final allocation of purchase price to the assets and liabilities of
business acquired.
50
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The actual tax expense (benefit) differs from the "expected" tax expense
(benefit) (computed by applying the U.S. Federal corporate rate of 34% to
earnings (loss) before income taxes (benefit) and extraordinary item) as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
----------------------
1992 1993 1994
------- ----- ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computed "Expected" Tax Expense
(Benefit).............................................. $ 2,329 3,648 (6,593)
Increase (Reduction) in Income Taxes
Resulting from:
Additional Provision for Foreign
Source, Income......................................... -- -- 1,754
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax
Assets................................................. -- -- 384
Life Insurance Proceeds................................ (1,020) -- --
Foreign Tax Differential............................... 102 (841) 2,654
Utilization of Net Operating Loss
Carry Forward.......................................... (905) (470) --
Utilization of Foreign Tax Credits..................... -- (377) --
Alternative Minimum Tax (Credits)...................... 73 (71) --
Utilization of Research and
Experimentation Credit................................ -- (38) --
Non-deductible Goodwill................................ -- -- 182
State Income Taxes, Net of Federal
Benefit................................................ 121 187 --
Interest Charge Domestic
International
Sales Corp. ........................................... 441 58 --
Other, net.............................................. (17) (804) 157
------- ----- ------
$ 1,124 1,292 (1,462)
======= ===== ======
16% 12% 8%
</TABLE>
As a result of the current year loss and the allocation of income tax
benefit to continuing operations, no deferred tax benefit remained to be
allocated to the extraordinary loss or additional capital.
The Company has regular tax net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $3,970,000 that expire in 2005 and $28,090,000 that expire in
2009. To the extent that tax loss carryforwards are realized through reduction
of income taxes payable in future periods, the deferred tax liabilities will
be reinstated at the then current rate.
The Company has Minimum Tax Credit (MTC) carryforwards (which can be carried
forward indefinitely) of approximately $185,000, regular foreign tax credits
of approximately $1,030,000 and research and experimentation credit
carryforwards of approximately $150,000.
Regular foreign tax credits of $98,000 expire in 1995, $285,000 expire in
1996, $195,000 expire in 1997, $279,000 expire in 1998, and the balance of
$173,000 expires in 1999.
The research and experimentation credits expire from 1997 to 2003.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
51
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the
periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
Management does not believe it is more likely than not that the benefit of
deferred tax assets in excess of the scheduled reversal of deferred tax
liabilities will be realized. Accordingly, a valuation allowance of $5,894,000
has been established.
Subsequently recognized tax benefits relating to the valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets as of October 31, 1994 will be allocated as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Income tax benefit that would be reported in
the consolidated statements of operations.... $3,044
Additional capital (benefit from exercise of
stock options).................................2,850
------
$5,894
======
</TABLE>
(12) Pension Plans
The Company has a defined benefit plan for union employees. Retirement
benefits under the plan are based upon the number of years of credited service
up to a maximum of thirty years for the majority of the employees. The
Company's policy is to fund the minimum contribution permissible by the
Internal Revenue Service. In 1993, the Company elected to offer a non-
contributory 401K plan to all union employees.
The following are the components of pension expense related to the defined
benefit plan for 1992, 1993 and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1993 1994
---- ---- ----
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service Cost............................................... $51 60 78
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation.............. 69 71 81
Actual return on plan assets............................... (43) (51) (32)
Net amortization and deferral.............................. (20) (17) (38)
--- --- ---
$57 63 89
=== === ===
</TABLE>
The assets and obligations of the defined benefit plan at October 31, 1992,
1993 and 1994 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1993 1994
---- ----- -----
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Accumulated benefit obligation, including vested
benefits of $872,000, $1,019,000 and $1,007,000 at
October 31, 1992, 1993, and 1994, respectively....... $982 1,151 1,148
---- ----- -----
Projected benefit obligation for services rendered to
date................................................. 982 1,151 1,148
Plan assets at fair value (commingled funds held by
insurance company)................................... 922 966 970
---- ----- -----
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets--accrued...................................... $ 60 185 178
---- ----- -----
Funded status......................................... $(60) (185) (178)
Unrecognized net obligation........................... 74 68 63
Unrecognized prior service cost....................... 87 80 74
Unrecognized net loss (gain).......................... (26) (3) 176
---- ----- -----
Adjustment required to record minimum liability....... -- (145) --
---- ----- -----
Prepaid (Accrued) pension cost........................ $ 75 (185) 135
==== ===== =====
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The accumulated benefit obligation represents the actuarial present value of
benefits based upon the benefit multiplied by the participants' historical
years of service. The projected benefit obligation equals the accumulated
benefit obligations since the benefits are non-pay-related. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions",
required the Company to adopt an additional minimum liability in 1993.
Accordingly, the Company recorded an additional long-term pension liability of
$145,000 and a corresponding intangible asset which is included in other
assets.
The accumulated and projected benefit obligation for 1992, 1993 and 1994
were calculated using the unit credit method and reflect the following
assumptions: discount rate of 8.0% in 1992, 7.25% in 1993; and 7.50% in 1994
and 9% long-term rate of return on assets.
In connection with its collective bargaining agreements, the Company
participates with other companies in a defined benefit pension plan covering
union employees. Payments made to the multi-employer plan were approximately
$253,000, $365,000 and $313,000 during the years ended October 31, 1992, 1993
and 1994, respectively.
The Company has a defined contribution, trusteed retirement plan for
salaried employees which is non-contributory. Under provisions of this plan,
pension expense for the years ended October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994 amounted
to approximately $204,000, $522,000 and $756,000, respectively. At October 31,
1994, the value of net assets exceeded the vested benefits of the plan. In
1993, the Company elected to offer a non-contributory 401K plan to all non-
union hourly and salaried employees.
(13) Management Incentive Compensation
Upon acquisition of Autotote Systems, Incorporated, the Company assumed the
obligations of an inactive management incentive compensation plan which is
included in the accompanying financial statements net of future tax benefits.
The obligations of the plan will be satisfied, upon favorable termination of
employment, through the issuance of 53,250 shares of Class A Common Stock at a
stated value of $3.33 per share.
The Company also makes cash awards to key management personnel based on
overall profitability of the Company as well as individual performance.
Management incentive compensation expense amounted to $510,000, $200,000 and
$884,000 in 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
(14) Service Contract Arrangements
Service arrangements for wagering systems in North America generally cover a
five-year period and provide for substantial related services such as
software, maintenance personnel, computer operators, and certain operating
supplies. They also provide for certain warranties covering operation of the
equipment, machines, display equipment, and central computing equipment. The
breach of such warranties could result in significant liquidated damages. The
equipment is placed at customer facilities under contracts generally providing
for revenue based on the greater of a percentage of total amounts wagered or a
specified minimum. The Company also has service contracts based on a
percentage of total amounts wagered with no specified minimum.
Minimum annual payments expected to be received under service contracts in
effect as of October 31, 1994 with a specified minimum are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ending October 31:
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
1995..................................... $ 14,726
1996..................................... 12,402
1997..................................... 8,751
1998..................................... 7,022
1999..................................... 5,594
After 1999............................... 5,249
--------
$ 53,744
========
</TABLE>
53
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Included in wagering systems revenues are minimum payments received under
service contracts of $10,384,000, $11,700,000 and $12,002,000 in 1992, 1993
and 1994, respectively.
(15) Capital Stock
The voting rights, dividend rate, redemption price, rights of conversion,
rights upon liquidation and other preferences of the undesignated preferred
stock are subject to determination by the Board of Directors.
On April 1, 1993, the Company completed a public offering of Class A Common
Stock (the Public Offering). The Public Offering resulted in the sale of
11,412,000 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock at a price of $9.00
per share. Of the 11,412,000 shares sold, 9,214,000 shares were sold for the
account of the Company resulting in net proceeds, before expenses of the
offering, of $77,708,000 while 2,198,000 shares were sold to the public by
certain selling stockholders.
Terms of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock provided for cumulative
dividends at a rate of 8% on the stated liquidation preference of $134.30 per
share. Each share is convertible into common stock at the liquidation
preference divided by the conversion price, as defined, which was $4.39 at
October 31, 1992. In January 1993, the conversion privilege on all outstanding
shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was exercised.
In 1992, the stockholders approved an Amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company designating two classes of common stock
consisting of Class A Common Stock and Class B Nonvoting Common Stock (Class B
Common Stock). All shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
entitle holders to the same rights and privileges except that the Class B
Common Stock is nonvoting. Each share of Class B Common Stock is convertible
into one share of Class A Common Stock.
In 1993, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation increasing the Company's authorized Common Stock from 25,000,000
shares (24,300,000 of which were designated Class A Common Stock and 700,000
shares of which were designated Class B Common Stock) to 100,000,000 shares
(99,300,000 shares which are designated Class A Common Stock and 700,000
shares of which were designated Class B Common Stock).
Warrants
On October 31, 1991, in exchange for consideration of $873,000, the Company
issued a warrant to a lender exercisable at $.01 per share, to purchase
642,192 shares of the common stock of the Company (the Warrant). The Company
also granted the lender an option to purchase 5% of any future issuance of any
securities of the Company, subsequent to October 31, 1991 at the same price at
which any such shares are then issued. The Warrant and the option both have
terms of 10 years and provide the lender with certain registration rights. At
October 31, 1992. 41,760 shares were under option at an average purchase price
of $1.93 per share. In April 1993, all shares under option were exercised. At
October 31, 1994 no securities were subject to the above option.
During 1992, the Company issued to the lender a warrant (the Class B
Warrant) to purchase 873,000 shares of Class B Common Stock against
cancellation of the Warrant initially issued to the lender. The Class B
Warrant has the same exercise price, expiration date and other terms as the
Warrant.
In 1992, the Company issued to lenders warrants (the 1992 Lender Warrants)
exercisable at $3.83 per share to purchase 592,074 shares of Class B Common
Stock of the Company representing, in the aggregate, 3% of the fully diluted
outstanding shares of the Company. In addition, the original option issued to
the lender in 1991 was amended to apply only to below market issuance and the
warrant to purchase 873,000 shares of Class B Common Stock at $0.01 per share
was increased to 1,173,000 shares. The Class B Warrant was exercised in April
1993.
54
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The 1992 Lender Warrants give the Lenders certain registration rights, and
expire November 1, 2003. The Company also granted the Lenders an option to
purchase 3% of any future issuance of securities of the Company below market
value, with certain exceptions, at the same price at which any such securities
are then issued. The option has a term of 10 years and gives the Lenders
certain registration rights.
In October, 1994, the Board approved the exchange of certain outstanding
warrants to purchase Class B Common Stock for warrants to purchase Class A
Common Stock.
In October, 1994, one holder of the 1992 Lender warrants acquired 354,546
shares of Class A common stock through a cashless exercise of 445,281 1992
Lender warrants. The holder surrendered 90,735 warrants to effect this
exercise and no cash proceeds were received by the Company. At October 31,
1994, warrants were outstanding to purchase 146,793 shares of Class B Common
Stock.
At October 31, 1994, warrants were outstanding to purchase 2,300,613 shares
of Class A Common Stock .
(16) Stock Options
On July 17, 1984, the Company adopted a Stock Option Plan (the 1984 Plan)
under which 562,500 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance to
employees including officers and directors who are also employees. In Fiscal
Year 1992, the Company increased the number of shares of Class A Common Stock
available for delivery under the 1984 Plan to 1,350,000.
On December 17, 1992, the Company adopted an Equity Incentive Plan (the 1992
Plan) under which 900,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance to
employees including officers and directors.
At the August 10, 1994 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved an increase in
the number of shares which may be delivered under the 1992 Equity Incentive
Plan to 3,000,000.
From time to time, the Company grants additional stock options to
individuals outside of the 1992 plan, in recognition of contributions made to
the Company.
Information with respect to the Company's stock options are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STOCK OPTIONS NUMBER OF SHARES PRICE RANGE
------------- ---------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at October 31, 1991.............. 195,000 $ 1.28- $4.25
Granted.................................... 2,040,000 $ 1.59- $3.92
Exercised.................................. 6,000 $1.28
Canceled................................... 189,000 $ 1.33- $4.25
---------
Outstanding at October 31, 1992.............. 2,040,000
Granted.................................... 1,884,900 $ 4.84-$26.25
Exercised.................................. 174,695 $ 1.59- $3.50
---------
Outstanding at October 31, 1993.............. 3,750,205
Granted.................................... 883,400 $15.75-$22.00
Exercised.................................. 428,503 $ 1.59-$13.50
---------
Outstanding at October 31, 1994.............. 4,205,102
=========
</TABLE>
At October 31, 1994, 1,585,102 options to acquire shares of common stock
were exercisable. Outstanding options expire prior to November 1, 1999, and
are exercisable at prices ranging from $1.59 to $26.25 per share.
55
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(17) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is determined by reference to market
data and other valuation techniques as appropriate. The Company believes the
fair value of its financial instruments, principally accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and long-term debt, approximates their
recorded values.
(18) Litigation
The Company and certain of its officers and directors have been named as
defendants in lawsuits commenced in February 1995 as class actions in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The putative
classes consist of purchasers of Class A Common Stock and put and call options
between March 1994 and January 30, 1995. The complaints allege that the
Company and certain of its officers and directors violated the federal
securities laws and seek remedies of unspecified monetary damages and awards
of fees and expenses. The Company expects the lawsuits to be consolidated into
one action. The Company intends to vigorously defend these proceedings.
However, the ultimate outcome of the actions cannot yet be determined, and no
provisions for any liability, if any, that may result from the actions has
been recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
(19) Export Sales and Major Customers
Sales to foreign customers amounted to $4,832,000, $10,067,000 and
$6,073,000 in 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively.
A single customer represented $27,290,000 of fiscal 1994 revenues.
(20) Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OCTOBER 31,
--------------
1993 1994
------- ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Compensation and benefits................... $ 2,881 4,833
Taxes, other than income.................... 2,217 575
Customer advances on sales contracts........ 791 1,420
Sales and use tax........................... -- 1,932
Contract reserves........................... -- 2,171
Accrued interest............................ 669 813
Other....................................... 4,578 5,420
------- ------
$11,136 17,164
======= ======
</TABLE>
56
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(21) Business and Geographic Segments
Revenues, profits, depreciation and assets by business and geographic
segments for the years ended October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31
-----------------------
1992 1993 1994
------- ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Service contract revenue and product sales
Pari-mutuel/sports betting......................... $42,804 64,104 84,201
Lottery operations................................. -- 6,514 27,542
Off-track betting concerns......................... -- 8,860 29,725
Simulcasting services.............................. 5,560 5,384 7,582
------- ------- -------
$48,364 84,862 149,050
======= ======= =======
Operating income (loss)
Pari-mutuel/sports betting......................... $ 8,161 9,601 (13,497)
Lottery operations................................. -- 1,764 287
Off-track betting concerns......................... -- 1,766 3,263
Simulcasting services.............................. 625 774 (3,987)
------- ------- -------
$ 8,786 13,905 (13,934)
======= ======= =======
Depreciation and amortization
Pari-mutuel/sports betting......................... $ 7,026 10,420 17,087
Lottery operations................................. -- 422 5,888
Off-track betting concerns......................... -- 207 1,561
Simulcasting services.............................. 814 760 882
------- ------- -------
$ 7,840 11,809 25,418
======= ======= =======
Assets
Pari-mutuel/sports betting......................... $59,979 126,386 160,907
Lottery operations................................. -- 34,206 35,522
Off-track betting concerns......................... -- 22,734 41,042
Simulcasting services.............................. 2,971 3,779 8,383
------- ------- -------
$62,950 187,105 245,854
======= ======= =======
Capital expenditures and expenditures for equipment
under wagering systems contracts
Pari-mutuel/sports betting......................... $ 5,646 47,115 42,868
Lottery operations................................. -- 1,313 1,511
Off-track betting concerns......................... -- 173 14,272
Simulcasting services.............................. 547 1,176 4,283
------- ------- -------
$ 6,193 49,777 62,934
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
57
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONCLUDED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31
-----------------------
1992 1993 1994
------- ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS
Service contract revenue and product sales
North America...................................... $45,963 70,744 91,915
Europe............................................. 2,401 14,118 50,350
Asia............................................... -- -- 6,785
------- ------- -------
$48,364 84,862 149,050
======= ======= =======
Operating income (loss)
North America...................................... $ 7,814 6,380 (23,460)
Europe............................................. 972 7,525 7,151
Asia............................................... -- -- 2,375
------- ------- -------
$ 8,786 13,905 (13,934)
======= ======= =======
Depreciation and amortization
North America...................................... $ 7,840 11,647 19,653
Europe............................................. -- 162 5,715
Asia............................................... -- -- 50
------- ------- -------
$ 7,840 11,809 25,418
======= ======= =======
Assets
North America...................................... $62,950 140,677 196,907
Europe............................................. -- 46,428 48,947
Asia............................................... -- -- --
------- ------- -------
$62,950 187,105 245,854
======= ======= =======
Capital expenditures and expenditures for equipment
under wagering systems contracts
North America...................................... $ 6,193 49,462 60,929
Europe............................................. -- 315 2,005
Asia............................................... -- -- --
------- ------- -------
$ 6,193 49,777 62,934
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
(22) Subsequent Acquisitions--(unaudited)
On November 1, 1994, the Company acquired 80% of the capital stock of the
holding company of SEPMO S.A., ("SEPMO"), a French supplier of wagering
systems and services to the French off-track betting network and other
customers for a purchase price of approximately $2.3 million. The remaining
20% of the stock of SEPMO is scheduled to be purchased in four equal
installments over a period of four years at a purchase price to be determined
by a formula based on the results of operations of SEPMO on a consolidated
basis.
On January 19, 1995, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of
the Simulcast Division of LDDS Corporation (formerly IDB Communications Group,
Inc.) ("IDB") for a purchase price of $9 million in cash. The Company also
acquired the rights and obligations under leases relating to eight C-band
satellite transponders for $4.5 million in cash.
58
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE VIII
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
THREE YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1994
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONS
----------------------
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND TO OTHER END OF
OF PERIOD EXPENSES ACCOUNTS(1) DEDUCTIONS(2) PERIOD
---------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1992
Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $936 831 -- 944 823
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1993
Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $823 423 78 350 974
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1994
Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $974 625 -- 1,101 498
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Amounts related to acquired companies.
(2) Amounts written off.
59
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE MATTERS
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
See "Executive Officers and Directors of the Company" in Part I of this 10-K
Report.
DELINQUENT FILINGS
Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company's directors, its
officers, and any persons holding more than ten percent of the Company's Class
A Common Stock are required to report their ownership of the Company's Class A
Common Stock and any changes in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Specific due dates for these reports have been established and the
Company is required to report in this proxy statement any failure to file by
these dates during 1994. All of these filing requirements were satisfied by
its directors and officers and ten percent holders. In making these
statements, the Company has relied on the written representations of its
directors and officers and copies of the reports that they have filed with the
Commission.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table shows the cash compensation paid by the Company for
services rendered for the years ended October 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994 to the
chief executive officer and the four highest paid executive officers of the
Company who received more than $100,000 in salary and bonuses during fiscal
1994 who served as executive officers during fiscal 1994 (the "Named Executive
Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPENSATION
-----------------------
ANNUAL LONG TERM
COMPENSATION(1) AWARDS
----------------------- -----------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (G) (I)
--- ---- ------- ------- ---------- ------------
SECURITIES
NAME AND UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
PRINCIPAL SALARY BONUS OPTIONS COMPENSATION
POSITION YEAR ($) ($) (#) ($)(2)
--------- ---- ------- ------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A. Lorne Weil.............. 1994 408,800 -- -- 17,700
Chief Executive Officer 1993 391,300 200,000 600,000 --
1992 252,500(3) 240,000 1,125,000 6,000
Dennis C. Wallach(4)....... 1994 148,100 135,000(5) 150,000 --
Chief Financial Officer
William J. Huntley......... 1994 135,000 70,000(6) 25,000 6,800
Vice President--Operations 1993 135,000 -- 45,000 6,800
1992 125,000 25,000 75,000 6,200
Martin E. Schloss(8)....... 1994 135,600 115,000(7) 65,000 5,800
Vice President and General
Counsel 1993 125,000 -- -- --
John A. DeVries(9)......... 1994 175,000 -- -- 3,000
Executive Vice President
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
- --------
(1) Amounts shown include cash and non-cash compensation earned by executive
officers.
(2) Represents the Company's contribution to the defined contribution
retirement plan for salaried employees on behalf of such individuals.
(3) Includes $120,000 of compensation paid to Lorne Weil, Inc. pursuant to a
consulting agreement.
(4) Mr. Wallach was not an executive officer during fiscal years 1992 and 1993.
(5) Includes fiscal 1994 bonus of $60,000 and signing bonus of $75,000. $60,000
of Mr. Wallach's bonus will be paid in three equal installments in 1995,
1996 and 1997 as long as he is employed by the Company.
(6) Includes fiscal 1994 bonus of $35,000 and special bonus of $35,000 to
recognize contribution to the Company's longer-term strategic goals. Will
be paid in three equal installments in 1995, 1996 and 1997 as long as he is
employed by the Company.
(7) Includes fiscal 1994 bonus of $60,000 and special bonus of $55,000 to
recognize contribution to the Company's longer-term strategic goals. Will
be paid in three equal installments in 1995, 1996 and 1997 as long as he is
employed by the Company.
(8) Mr. Schloss was not an executive officer during fiscal year 1992.
(9) Mr. DeVries was not an executive officer during fiscal years 1992 and 1993.
The table below sets forth information with respect to stock options granted
to the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 1994.
OPTIONS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POTENTIAL
REALIZABLE
VALUE
AT ASSUMED
ANNUAL RATES
OF STOCK
PRICE
APPRECIATION
FOR
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS OPTION TERM
------------------------------------------ -------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
--- ---------- ----------- -------- ---------- -------- ----------
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL
SECURITIES OPTIONS
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES OR BASE
GRANTED(1) IN PRICE EXPIRATION 5% 10%
NAME # FISCAL YEAR ($/SH) DATE ($) ($)
---- ---------- ----------- -------- ---------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A. Lorne Weil........... 0 0.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dennis C. Wallach....... 150,000 16.98% $21.00 30-Dec-98 $870,287 $1,923,107
William J. Huntley...... 25,000 2.83% $17.00 6-Apr-99 $117,420 $ 259,467
Martin E. Schloss....... 65,000 7.36% $17.00 6-Apr-99 $305,291 $ 674,614
John A. DeVries......... 0 0.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) All options become exercisable in three equal annual installments on the
first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The options
may, subject to certain requirements, be exercised through the delivery of
cash and/or Class A Common Stock. The options permit the optionee to
request that the Company withhold shares sufficient to satisfy withholding
tax requirements. The options are not transferable otherwise than by will
or the laws of descent and distribution, in which case, and in the case of
disability, they are exercisable for the following 12 months or the term of
the option, whichever is shorter, for the full number of shares the
optionee was entitled to purchase at the time of his death or disability.
In the event of a termination of employment by the Company other than for
cause or death or disability, an optionee has the right to exercise his
option at any time within the three months following such termination or
the term of the option, whichever is shorter, for the full number of shares
he was entitled to purchase at the time of termination. In the event of
termination for cause, the options shall be terminated.
61
<PAGE>
The table below sets forth information for the Named Executive Officers with
respect to fiscal 1994 year-end option values.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN
LAST FISCAL YEAR, AND FY-END OPTION VALUE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
--- -------------- ------------ ----------------- --------------------
NUMBER OF VALUE OF
SECURITIES UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING IN-THE-MONEY
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT
SHARES OPTIONS AT OCT. 31,
ACQUIRED OCT. 31, 1994 (#) 1994 ($)
ON VALUE OF EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME EXERCISE(#)(2) REALIZED ($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- -------------- ------------ ----------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A. Lorne Weil........... -0- -0- 1,125,000/600,000 $16,359,000/$522,000
Dennis L. Wallach....... -0- -0- -0-/150,000 N/A / N/A
William J. Huntley...... 65,000 $1,089,150 -0-/80,000 -0-/$790,050
Martin E. Schloss....... 20,000 $ 330,000 20,000/85,000 $ 285,000/$317,500
John A. DeVries......... -0- -0- 33,333/66,667 $ 197,832/$395,668
</TABLE>
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors for the 1994 fiscal
year consisted of Larry J. Lawrence, Alan J. Zakon and Sir Brian Wolfson. Sir
Brian served as Acting President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
from June 1991 until October 31, 1991.
Effective December 1, 1994 the Company has a wagering systems service
contract with Lincoln Greyhound Racetrack, a facility owned by Wembley plc, a
United Kingdom corporation of which Sir Brian Wolfson, a director of the
Company, is chairman.
The Company has a senior bank credit facility with Bankers Trust Company, a
company of which Alan J. Zakon, a director of the Company, is a managing
director.
CERTAIN ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND ITS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Employee Agreements
Effective November 1, 1992, the Company and Mr. Weil entered into a five-
year employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") that provides for a
base salary of $400,000, subject to annual increases in accordance with the
Consumer Price Index, a performance bonus of 25% of base salary if the Company
meets its budgeted earnings per share, an additional performance bonus based
on excess earnings per share, not to exceed an additional 25% of base salary,
and a performance bonus of up to 50% of base salary at the discretion of the
Board of Directors. If the Company terminates Mr. Weil's employment under the
Employment Agreement other than for cause, Mr. Weil is entitled to collect his
base salary for twelve months following such termination, plus a portion of
the annual earnings per share-based performance bonuses. In connection with
the Employment Agreement, Mr. Weil received a five-year option to purchase
600,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of
$3.50 per share. The option originally was exercisable in three equal annual
installments on November 1, 1993, November 1, 1994 and November 1, 1995. In
August 1993, the Compensation Committee accelerated the vesting period of the
option such that the option is now exercisable in full. In the event of a
consolidation or merger in which the Company is not the surviving corporation
or which results in the acquisition of substantially all of the Company's
outstanding Class A Common Stock by a single person or entity or by a group of
persons and/or entities acting in concert or in the event of the sale or
transfer of substantially all of the Company's assets, the option is
exercisable in full.
62
<PAGE>
On December 30, 1993, the Company and Mr. Wallach entered into a three-year
employment agreement to employ Mr. Wallach as an officer of the Company. The
agreement provided for a signing bonus of $75,000 and a base salary of
$175,000 per year. In connection with the agreement, Mr. Wallach received an
option to purchase 150,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at an
exercise price of $21.00 per share, which option is exercisable in three equal
installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of
grant. If the Company terminates Mr. Wallach's employment for any reason other
than cause, Mr. Wallach is entitled to receive his base salary for a period of
twelve months from the date of termination.
On November 14, 1994, the Company and Mr. Gerald Lawrence entered into a
one-year employment agreement to employ Mr. Lawrence as Vice President of
North American Pari-Mutuel Operations. The agreement provides for a base
salary of $200,000 and a performance bonus of up to 45% of the base salary. In
connection with the agreement, Mr. Lawrence received an option to purchase
100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at a price of $15.00 per
share, which option is exercisable in three equal installments. In the event
that the Company terminates Mr. Lawrence's employment other than for cause,
Mr. Lawrence is entitled to receive his base salary for twelve months
following such termination.
Directors' Compensation
Each non-officer director of the Company is paid an annual retainer of
$17,500, as well as $1,000 plus expenses for each Board of Directors meeting
attended and $500 plus expenses for each committee meeting attended. In lieu
of the foregoing compensation, Mr. Lee receives $5,000 per month for his
services as a director and as Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board
of Directors.
Mr. Bartlett has a consulting arrangement with the Company whereby he
receives $100,000 per year for consulting services.
63
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 1994
as to the security ownership of those persons owning of record or known to the
Company to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of the
outstanding Class A Common Stock of the Company, each of the Company's
directors and named executive officers and the Company's executive officers
and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the stockholders
listed on the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the
shares indicated. Share figures reflect (i) a three-for-two stock split in the
form of a stock dividend of one share of Class A Common Stock for every two
shares outstanding paid on June 30, 1993 and (ii) a two-for-one stock split in
the form of a stock dividend of one share of Class A Common Stock for each
share outstanding paid on October 25, 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES OF
CLASS A
COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1)
----------------------------
NUMBER PERCENT
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND 5% STOCKHOLDERS
Lawrence Tyrell, Ortale & Smith..................... 1,867,952(2) 6.27
515 Madison Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Wellington Management Company....................... 4,260,400(3) 14.08
75 State Street,
Boston, MA 02109
T. Rowe Price Associates............................ 1,769,000(4) 6.30
100 East Pratt Street,
Baltimore, MD 21202
Sun Trust Banks, Inc. .............................. 2,430,800(5) 8.60
25 Park Place, N.E.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
A. Lorne Weil....................................... 2,417,092(6) 7.92
Dennis C. Wallach................................... 50,000(7) *
Marshall Bartlett................................... 31,833(8) *
Larry J. Lawrence................................... 2,412,123(9) 8.08
Thomas H. Lee....................................... 4,023,465(10) 13.07
Sir Brian Wolfson................................... 15,000(11) *
John A. DeVries..................................... 33,333(12) *
Alan J. Zakon....................................... 17,000(13) *
William Huntley..................................... 64,078(14) *
Martin E. Schloss................................... 35,000(15) *
All Current Directors and Executive Officers as a
Group (consisting of 12 persons)
(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)............... 9,215,072(16) 28.48
</TABLE>
- --------
* Less than 1%
(1) For purposes of determining beneficial ownership of the Company's Class A
Common Stock, owners of Class A warrants and options exercisable within
sixty days are considered to be the beneficial owners of the shares of
Class A Common Stock into which such securities are convertible or for
which such securities are exercisable. The percentage ownership of the
outstanding Class A Common Stock reported herein is based on the
assumption (expressly required by the applicable rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission) that only the person whose ownership is being
reported has exercised his warrants or options for Class A Common Stock.
(2) Includes 965,469 warrants exercisable within 60 days owned by Lawrence,
Tyrrell, Ortale & Smith.
64
<PAGE>
(3) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 3, 1995, Wellington Management Company ("WMC") holds
4,260,400 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock at December 31,
1994. Such shares are owned by a variety of investment advisory clients
of WMC or its subsidiary, and WMC has shared power to vote or to direct
the vote of 3,650,170 of such shares and shared power to dispose or
direct the disposition of all 4,260,400 shares, and does not have sole
voting or dispositive power with respect to any of such shares.
(4) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 14, 1995, these securities are owned by various individual
and institutional investors which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. ("Price
Associates") serves as investment adviser with power to direct
investments and/or shared power to vote the securities. For purposes of
the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price
Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities;
however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the
beneficial owner of such securities.
(5) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 3, 1995, includes shares held by one or more bank
subsidiaries of Sun Banks, Inc. and Trust Company of Georgia subsidiaries
of Sun Trust Banks, Inc. ("Sun Banks") in various fiduciary and agency
capacities. Sun Banks disclaims any beneficial interest in such shares.
Sun Banks has sole power to direct the vote of 1,797,300 of such shares
and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 2,214,300 of such
shares, and does not have shared power to dispose or direct the disposal
of any such shares.
(6) Includes shares held in the name of Lorne Weil 1989 Trust. Also includes
shares of Class A Common Stock warrants to purchase 577,920 exercisable
within 60 days owned by Mr. Weil, some of which are held in the name of
Lorne Weil 1989 Trust, and options to purchase 1,125,000 shares of Class
A Common Stock exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. Weil. Mr. Weil's
address is c/o the Company. See "Management-Employment Agreements."
Effective March 25, 1994, Mr. Weil entered into a swap transaction (the
"Swap") with BTC in respect of 500,000 shares of the Class A Common Stock
of the Company held by him (the "Swap Shares"). Mr. Weil continues to
hold sole voting power over the Swap Shares which serve as collateral for
the Swap transaction; however, Mr. Weil may substitute other collateral
for the Swap Shares. Under the Swap arrangement (i) Mr. Weil is obligated
to pay BTC (a) at the end of each quarter during the five (5) year term
of the Swap (the "Term") the amount of any dividends declared during such
quarter on the Swap and (b) at the end of the Term, any appreciation
during the Term in the price of the Swap Shares above $26.7769 per share,
(ii) BTC is obligated to pay Mr. Weil (x) at the end of each quarter
during the Term, the amount equal to the three (3) month London Interbank
Offered Rate less 2.125% of the Calculation Amount (as defined in the
Swap documents) of $13,388,500, and (y) at the end of the Term, an amount
equal to any depreciation during the Term, in the price of the Swap
Shares below $26.7769 per share. Mr. Weil will pay BTC an annual fee in
consideration of its entering into the Swap. The Swap is for a five (5)
year period, but will terminate if Mr. Weil dies or if certain other
events occur during such period.
(7) Represents shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase 50,000
shares of Class A Common Stock exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr.
Wallach.
(8) Represents shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase 31,833
shares of Class A Common Stock exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr.
Bartlett.
(9) Includes 902,483 shares and warrants to purchase 965,469 shares of Class
A Common Stock exercisable within 60 days held by the partnership of
Lawrence, Tyrrell, Ortale & Smith (see footnote 2) and warrants to
purchase 41,742 shares of Class A Common Stock exercisable within 60 days
owned by Mr. Lawrence. Mr. Lawrence is a general partner of Lawrence
Venture Partners, the sole general partner of such partnership. Mr.
Lawrence's address is c/o the Company.
(10) Includes warrants to purchase 542,109 shares of Class A Common Stock
exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. Lee and 1,535,100 shares owned by
the 1989 Thomas H. Lee Nominee Trust and 1,946,256 shares owned by Thomas
H. Lee Equity Partners, L.P., which are deemed to be beneficially owned
by Mr. Lee. Mr. Lee is a general partner of THL Equity Advisors Limited
Partnership, which is general partner of Thomas H. Lee Equity Partners,
L.P. Mr. Lee's address is c/o the Company.
(11) Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of 15,000 options
exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. Wolfson.
65
<PAGE>
(12) Includes options to purchase 33,333 shares of Class A Common Stock
exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. DeVries.
(13) Includes options to purchase 15,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. Zakon.
(14) Includes options to purchase 40,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. Huntley.
(15) Includes options to purchase 20,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
exercisable within 60 days owned by Mr. Schloss.
(16) Includes warrants to purchase 2,163,360 shares of Class A Common Stock
and options to purchase 1,360,166 shares of Class A Common Stock
exercisable within 60 days.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company has its senior bank credit facility with Bankers Trust Company,
a company of which Alan J. Zakon, a director of the Company, is a managing
director.
The Company has a service contract with Lincoln Greyhound Racetrack, a
facility owned by Wembly plc, a United Kingdom corporation of which Sir Brian
Wolfson, a director of the Company, is chairman.
Mr. Bartlett has a consulting arrangement with the Company whereby he
receives $100,000 per year for consulting services.
The Company believes that all of these transactions were on terms no less
favorable than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
66
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements--See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
attached hereto, page 33.
2. Financial Statements Schedules--See Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements attached hereto, page 33.
Exhibits--The following is a list of exhibits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended through
October 22, 1993.(12)
3.2 Bylaws of the Company.(6)
4.1 Certificate representing share of Class A Common Stock of the
Company.(6)
4.2 See Exhibits Nos. 3.1, 3.2, and 10.12 through 10.13, infra.
10.1 1984 Stock Option Plan, as amended.(6)*
10.4 Definitive Agreement Governing the Split Off of United Tote World
Wide, Inc. and UT Wisconsin, Inc. from United Tote, Inc. dated as of
October 31, 1991 and Exhibits and Schedules thereto (including the Tax
Sharing Agreement dated as of October 31 1991).(5)
10.5 Letter Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1991, between the Company,
Wembley, Inc., United Tote Company, and Autotote Limited.(5)
10.6 Allocation Agreement dated as of October 31, 1991 between Autotote
Limited and United Tote Company.(5)
10.7 Loan Agreement dated March 17, 1982 between the Company and The
Delaware Economic Development Authority.(7)
10.8 First Mortgage and Security Agreement dated March 17, 1982 between the
Company and Delaware Trust Company.(7)
10.9 Form of Option dated March 3, 1992 issued to A. Lorne Weil.(7)*
10.10 Form of Option dated December 13, 1991 issued to Marshall
Bartlett.(7)*
10.11 Employment Agreement dated November 1, 1992, of A. Lorne Weil and
Autotote Corporation.(7)*
10.12 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 28, 1994 among
Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and other lenders. (13)
10.13 First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 20, 1994 among Autotote
Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and other lenders.
10.14 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 20, 1994 among
Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and other lenders.
10.15 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated December 27, 1994 among
Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and other lenders.
10.16 Employment Agreement dated July 18, 1994 between the Company and
Marvin H. Sugarman.*
10.17 Employment Agreement dated December 30, 1993 between the Company and
Dennis C. Wallach.*
10.18 Employment Agreement between Gerald Lawrence and the Company dated
November 14, 1994.*
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.19 Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 15, 1994 among the Company, Marvin
H. Sugarman, Robert Melican, Racing Technology, Inc. and Marvin H.
Sugarman Productions, Inc.
10.20 Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 12, 1995 between Autotote
Communications Services, Inc. and IDB Communications Group Inc.
10.21 Purchase Agreement dated October 14, 1994 between Autotote
Corporation, Yves Alexandre,
Marie A. Alexandre and Frederic Alexandre. (English summary attached
to French original.)
10.22 1992 Equity Incentive Plan.(8)
10.23 Purchase Agreement among the Company, Autotote Enterprises, Inc., and
the State of Connecticut, Division of Special Revenue, dated June 30,
1993.(10)
10.24 Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and General Instrument
Corporation dated
May 18, 1993.(9)
10.25 Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Company and Sven Eriksson
dated May 27, 1993.(9)
10.26 Agreement among ETAG Electronic Totalisator AG, Gerhard Harwalik,
Peter Freudenschuss, Peter Tinkl and Manfred Harwalik dated July 27,
1993.(11)
10.27 Purchase Agreement among certain purchasers and Autotote Corporation
dated August 13, 1993.(11)
10.28 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated February 21, 1995 among
Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and other lenders.
21 List of Subsidiaries. (New)
23 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
28.1 Copy of Final Judgment and Order of the United States District Court
for the District of Delaware dated August 28, 1991.(7)
</TABLE>
- --------
(*) Includes management contracts and compensation plans and arrangements.
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 2-92090) which became effective on August 23, 1984.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated November 30,
1988.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated April 11, 1989.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 11,
1989.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated November 14,
1991, as amended by Form 8 dated December 10, 1991.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 33-46594) which became effective March 20, 1992.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year endedOctober 31, 1992.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-2 (Registration Statement No. 33-57930) which became effective on
April 1, 1993.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated June 22, 1993.
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 1, 1993.
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 8,
1993.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 1993.
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 30, 1994 dated June 14, 1994.
68
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED
ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
Autotote Corporation
Dated: February 24, 1995
/s/ A. Lorne Weil
By __________________________________
A. LORNE WEIL
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE
REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES INDICATED ON FEBRUARY 24, 1995.
SIGNATURE TITLE
/s/ A. Lorne Weil Chairman of the Board,
- ------------------------------------- President & Chief Executive
A. LORNE WEIL Officer, and Director
(Principal executive
officer)
/s/ Dennis C. Wallach Executive Vice President and
- ------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer,
DENNIS C. WALLACH (principal financial
officer and principal
accounting officer)
/s/ Sir Brian Wolfson Director
- -------------------------------------
SIR BRIAN WOLFSON
/s/ Larry J. Lawrence Director
- -------------------------------------
LARRY J. LAWRENCE
/s/ Thomas H. Lee Director
- -------------------------------------
THOMAS H. LEE
/s/ Marshall Bartlett Director
- -------------------------------------
MARSHALL BARTLETT
/s/ Alan J. Zakon Director
- -------------------------------------
ALAN J. ZAKON
69
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE
----------- ----------- ----
<C> <S> <C>
10.13 First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 20, 1994
among Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and
other lenders.
10.14 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 20, 1994
among Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and
other lenders.
10.15 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated December 27, 1994
among Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company and
other lenders.
10.16 Employment Agreement dated July 18, 1994 between the
Company and Marvin H. Sugarman.
10.17 Employment Agreement dated December 30, 1993 between the
Company and Dennis C. Wallach.
10.18 Employment Agreement between Gerald Lawrence and the
Company dated November 14, 1994.
10.19 Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 15, 1994 among the
Company, Marvin H. Sugarman, Robert Melican, Racing
Technology, Inc. and Marvin H. Sugarman Productions, Inc.
10.20 Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 12, 1995 between
Autotote Communications Services, Inc. and IDB
Communications Group Inc.
10.21 Purchase Agreement dated October 14, 1994 between Autotote
Corporation, Yves Alexandre, Marie A. Alexandre and
Frederic Alexandre.
10.28 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated February 21,
1995, among Autotote Systems, Inc., Bankers Trust Company
and other lenders.
21 List of Subsidiaries. (New)
23 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
</TABLE>
70
<PAGE>
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS TRANSFER AGENT
A. Lorne Weil A. Lorne Weil American Stock Transfer
Chairman and Chief Chairman of the Board & Trust Company 40 Wall
Executive Officer of and Chief Executive Street New York, NY 10005
Autotote Corporation Officer
Sir Brian Wolfson Sir Brian Wolfson STOCK INFORMATION
Vice Chairman of Vice Chairman of the
Autotote Corporation Board At the close of business
Deputy Chairman of on June 29, 1995, a
Wembley plc Alan J. Zakon total of 28,929,946
Vice Chairman of the shares of Class A Common
Alan J. Zakon Board Stock were outstanding.
Vice Chairman of There were 553 holders
Autotote Corporation Thomas C. DeFazio of record on such date.
Executive Vice President
Larry J. Lawrence and Chief Financial
Managing General Partner Officer AUDITORS
of Lawrence, Tyrell,
Ortale & Smith Michael D. Harris KPMG Peat Marwick New
Vice President President York, New York
Marshall Bartlett of Autotote Systems Group
Former Executive Vice
President and COO of Gerald Lawrence
Bourns, Inc. Vice President President
of Autotote Gaming Group
Thomas H. Lee
President of Thomas H. Martin E. Schloss
Lee Company Vice President General
Counsel and Secretary
<PAGE>
AUTOTOTE CORPORATION
888 SEVENTH AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10106
212-541-6440
[LOGO OF AUTOTOTE APPEARS HERE]
