EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC
424B3, 1998-06-04
REFUSE SYSTEMS
Previous: GKN HOLDING CORP, PRE 14A, 1998-06-04
Next: LILLIAN VERNON CORP, DEF 14A, 1998-06-04



<PAGE>
 
                                                Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
                                                      Registration No. 333-37845


                      EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
               SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROSPECTUS DATED MARCH 3, 1998
                                        

     This Prospectus Supplement is provided by Eastern Environmental Services,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), to supplement the section  "Risk
Factors"  beginning on page 5 of the Company's Prospectus dated March 3, 1998
and included in the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration
No. 333-37845) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Prospectus").  Thus, the section "Risk Factors" contained in the Prospectus is
hereby supplemented by adding the risk factors set forth below.  To the extent
any risk factor contained in this Prospectus Supplement conflicts with or
supersedes any risk factor contained in the accompanying Prospectus, the risk
factor in this Prospectus Supplement shall control.

     RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLETING PENDING ACQUISITIONS

          The Company has entered into definitive agreements to acquire
     additional waste management businesses, the completion of which are subject
     to customary closing conditions, including due diligence and the
     requirements of obtaining certain governmental and other third party
     consents.  No assurance can be given that the closing conditions will be
     satisfied or that the parties will be able to obtain such governmental and
     other third party consents.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that
     any of these pending acquisitions will occur.

     HISTORY OF LOSSES; WORKING CAPITAL DEFICITS; CONTINUING CHARGES

          The Company has reported net losses in prior fiscal years, including a
     net loss to common stockholders of approximately $2.8 million (including
     $3.0 million in unusual items principally related to the Company's June
     1996 change of control) during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996.
     Additionally, the Company has reported working capital deficits, including
     $0.5 million and $1.6 million at June 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively.  In
     connection with the financing of its acquisitions and business growth, the
     Company has incurred, and anticipates that it will continue to incur,
     significant debt and interest charges under its revolving credit facility.
     In addition, the Company will continue to recognize a significant amount of
     goodwill amortization charges in connection with its acquisitions of
     collection and transportation businesses and transfer stations that are
     accounted for under the "purchase" method of accounting.  Such goodwill is
     amortized over a period not to exceed 40 years depending on the business
     acquired, resulting in an annual non-cash charge to earnings during that
     period.  As the Company continues to pursue its acquisition program, its
     financial position and results of operations may fluctuate significantly
     from period to period.

     LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY IN REGARD TO SIGNIFICANT ASSETS

          The Company's acquisition of solid waste collection, transportation
     and disposal businesses from July 1, 1996 through March 31, 1998
     contributed approximately $139 million or 95% of the Company's revenues for
     the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 and approximately 
<PAGE>
 
     $158 million or 86% of the Company's assets at June 30, 1997. Because of
     the Company's relatively limited operating history with respect to these
     recently acquired businesses, no assurances can be given that the Company
     will be able to replicate or improve upon their historical financial
     performance.

     POTENTIAL PENNSYLVANIA LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS

          One of the Company's Pennsylvania landfill operations, acquired by the
     Company in December 1996, has been in existence since 1972.  From 1972 to
     1988, the 110-acre area of the landfill which received waste or was
     authorized by state permits to receive waste had either received all
     necessary local zoning approvals or was not required by local ordinance to
     receive a zoning permit or other approval to operate.  In 1988, the Company
     received a state expansion permit for a 32-acre lined expansion area
     increasing the size of the permitted disposal area to 142 acres as well as
     conditional use zoning approval from the local township.  However, in 1990,
     the township adopted a new zoning ordinance which limited the height of
     municipal waste landfills to 35 feet above the original land contour.  The
     landfill, as permitted in 1988 and as currently designed and permitted,
     exceeds the height limit in certain areas.  The Company has maintained that
     the current permitted area is an existing nonconforming use and is not
     subject to the 35 foot height limitation imposed by the 1990 ordinance.  If
     the township seeks to impose this limitation, and is successful, the
     existing permitted capacity of the landfill would be materially reduced
     resulting in significant costs to the Company.

     KENTUCKY LANDFILL OBLIGATIONS

          The Company ceased operations at its Kentucky landfill on June 30,
     1995 because the existing permitted disposal area did not meet current
     state law design requirements.  From June 30, 1995 to June 30, 1996, the
     Company operated a transfer station at the landfill site and disposed of
     waste at an alternate location.  The Company simultaneously pursued a final
     state permit for an expansion area designed to meet the new state
     standards.  The suspension of landfill operations and the diversion of
     waste to an alternate location had an adverse  effect on the Company's
     operating results and the Company discontinued  its transfer station
     operation on July 1, 1996.  On July 1, 1997, the Company recommenced
     operation of its transfer station to fulfill the obligations of the
     disposal franchise until the Company's expansion area is completed.  The
     Company received a final permit to construct its expansion area on October
     14, 1996 (reissued February 26, 1997).  The final permit issued for the
     Kentucky landfill expansion area incorporated the requirements contained in
     an October 8, 1996 Agreed Order which settled an administrative appeal
     filed by the Somerset Pulaski County Concerned Citizens Group.  Prior to
     actual construction of the expansion area, the Company is required to
     complete an additional hydrogeologic investigation to confirm the adequacy
     of  the groundwater monitoring program approved in the final permit.  These
     studies are complete and indicate that the groundwater monitoring program
     is adequate.  The Company, however, has not yet received final approval
     from the state regulatory authority with respect to the final permit.

     POTENTIAL INADEQUACY OF ACCRUALS FOR CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE COSTS

          The Company has material financial obligations relating to closure and
     post-closure costs of the landfills it operates.  While the precise amounts
     of these future obligations cannot 

                                      -2-
<PAGE>
 
     be determined, the Company estimated the total costs to be approximately
     $27.8 million for final closure of its landfills, of which $8.5 million had
     been accrued at March 31, 1998. The Company makes an accrual for these
     costs based on consumed airspace in relation to management's estimate of
     total available airspace of the landfills. Post-closure monitoring costs
     pursuant to applicable regulations (generally for a term of 30 to 40 years
     after final closure) are estimated at $17.1 million. At March 31, 1998, the
     Company had accrued $5.5 million for such projected post-closure costs. The
     Company will provide additional accruals based on engineering estimates of
     consumption of permitted landfill airspace over the useful lives of its
     landfills. There can be no assurance that the Company's ultimate financial
     obligations for actual closing or post-closing costs will not exceed the
     amount then accrued and reserved or amounts otherwise receivable pursuant
     to insurance policies or trust funds. Such a circumstance could have a
     material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of
     operations.

     YEAR 2000 DISCLOSURE

          Currently, there is significant uncertainty regarding the impact of
     the Year 2000 on information systems such as those used by the Company.
     The Company does not currently believe that the effects of any Year 2000
     non-compliance on the Company's information systems should have any
     material adverse impact on the Company's business or results of operations;
     however, there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur expenses
     or experience business disruption as a result of system problems associated
     with the century change.


 Dated: June 3, 1998

                                      -3-


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission