<PAGE> 1
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 3, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-11593
THE SCOTTS COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
OHIO 31-1414921
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
41 SOUTH HIGH STREET
SUITE 3500
COLUMBUS, OHIO 43215
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
(ZIP CODE)
(614) 719-5500
(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
14111 SCOTTSLAWN ROAD
MARYSVILLE, OHIO 43041
(FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR,
IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock as of the latest practicable date.
18,357,302 Outstanding at August 6, 1999
Common Shares, voting, no par value
1
<PAGE> 2
<TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
<CAPTION>
PAGE NO.
--------
<S> <C> <C>
Part I. Financial Information:
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed, Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three
and nine month periods ended July 3, 1999 and July 4, 1998 3
Condensed, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine
month periods ended July 3, 1999 and July 4, 1998 4
Condensed, Consolidated Balance Sheets - July 3, 1999,
July 4, 1998, and September 30, 1998 5
Notes to Condensed, Consolidated Financial Statements 6-16
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 17-32
and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 33-34
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 35
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 35
Signatures 36
Exhibit Index 37
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS NINE MONTHS
ENDED ENDED
----- -----
JULY 3, JULY 4, JULY 3, JULY 4,
1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $586.2 $367.0 $1,402.2 $921.9
Cost of sales 349.8 235.7 832.1 578.8
------ ------ -------- ------
Gross profit 236.4 131.3 570.1 343.1
Commission earned from agency agreement 9.9 -- 27.5 --
Operating expenses:
Advertising and promotion 63.8 32.9 166.6 93.9
Selling, general and administrative 79.4 43.8 205.9 121.9
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles 8.3 3.5 18.5 9.7
Restructuring and other charges -- -- 1.4 --
Other (income) expense, net (0.3) 1.3 (0.1) 2.7
------ ------ -------- ------
Income from operations 95.1 49.8 205.3 114.9
Interest expense 24.6 9.2 59.0 25.7
------ ------ -------- ------
Income before taxes 70.5 40.6 146.3 89.2
Income tax expense 28.9 16.2 60.0 36.9
------ ------ -------- ------
Income before extraordinary item 41.6 24.4 86.3 52.3
Extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt, net of taxes -- -- 5.8 0.7
------ ------ -------- ------
Net income 41.6 24.4 80.5 51.6
Preferred stock dividends 2.4 2.4 7.3 7.3
------ ------ -------- ------
Income applicable to common shareholders 39.2 22.0 73.2 44.3
Basic earnings per common share:
Before extraordinary loss 2.14 1.18 4.32 2.41
Extraordinary loss, net of taxes -- -- 0.32 0.04
------ ------ -------- ------
2.14 1.18 4.00 2.37
Diluted earnings per common share:
Before extraordinary loss 1.35 0.80 2.83 1.72
Extraordinary loss, net of taxes -- -- 0.19 0.02
------ ------ -------- ------
1.35 0.80 2.64 1.70
Common shares used in basic earnings
per share calculation 18.3 18.7 18.3 18.7
Common shares and potential common shares
used in diluted earnings per share
calculation 30.9 30.6 30.5 30.3
</TABLE>
See notes to condensed, consolidated financial statements
3
<PAGE> 4
<TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS)
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------
JULY 3, JULY 4,
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 80.5 $ 51.6
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 42.8 27.6
Extraordinary loss, net of tax 5.8 0.7
Net change in certain components of working capital (14.9) 13.4
Net change in other assets and liabilities and
other adjustments (23.7) (0.3)
------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 90.5 93.0
------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment in property, plant and equipment, net (37.9) (21.7)
Investment in acquired businesses, net of cash acquired (496.4) (146.4)
Other, net (6.5) --
------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (540.8) (168.1)
------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Gross borrowings under term loans 525.0 101.4
Gross repayments under term loans (1.2) --
Net borrowings under revolving and bank lines of credit 15.5 --
Repayment of outstanding balance on old credit facility (241.0) --
Issuance of 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes 330.0 --
Partial extinguishment of 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes (104.1) --
Settlement of interest rate locks (12.9) --
Financing and issuance fees (23.8) --
Dividends on Class A Convertible Preferred Stock (9.8) (7.3)
Repurchase of treasury shares (6.3) --
Cash received from exercise of stock options 3.5 (2.3)
------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities 474.9 91.8
------- -------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (1.0) (0.1)
------- -------
Net increase in cash 23.6 16.6
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 10.6 13.0
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 34.2 $ 29.6
======= =======
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Businesses Acquired:
Fair value of assets acquired, net of cash $ 635.2 $ 192.3
Liabilities assumed (101.8) (45.9)
------- -------
Net assets acquired $ 533.4 $ 146.4
Cash paid 4.8 0.4
Notes issued to seller $ 37.0 --
Debt issued $ 491.6 $ 146.2
</TABLE>
See notes to condensed, consolidated financial statements
4
<PAGE> 5
<TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN MILLIONS)
ASSETS
<CAPTION>
UNAUDITED
---------
JULY 3, JULY 4, SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 1998 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 34.2 $ 29.6 $ 10.6
Accounts receivable, less allowances of
$15.5, $5.6 and $6.3, respectively 319.2 164.6 146.6
Inventories, net 281.1 165.3 177.7
Current deferred tax asset 22.1 19.5 20.8
Prepaid and other assets 36.2 10.4 11.5
-------- -------- --------
Total current assets 692.8 389.4 367.2
-------- -------- --------
Property, plant and equipment, net 241.3 187.7 197.0
Intangible assets, net 800.0 435.6 435.1
Other assets 35.4 6.4 35.9
-------- -------- --------
Total assets $1,769.5 $1,019.1 $1,035.2
======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt $ 41.2 $ 4.4 $ 13.3
Accounts payable 127.2 77.8 77.8
Accrued liabilities 182.1 97.2 124.9
Accrued taxes 40.5 36.4 15.9
-------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities 391.0 215.8 231.9
Long-term debt 855.6 332.0 359.2
Other liabilities 57.0 41.2 40.2
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities 1,303.6 589.0 631.3
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value 176.7 177.3 177.3
Common shares, no par value, $.01 stated value,
issued 21.1 shares in 1999 and 1998 0.2 0.2 0.2
Capital in excess of par value 209.1 208.3 208.7
Retained earnings 149.8 94.4 76.6
Treasury stock, 2.8, 2.4, and 2.8 shares,
respectively, at cost (58.9) (43.9) (55.9)
Foreign currency translation account (11.0) (6.2) (3.0)
-------- -------- --------
Total shareholders' equity 465.9 430.1 403.9
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders'
equity $1,769.5 $1,019.1 $1,035.2
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to condensed, consolidated financial statements
5
<PAGE> 6
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(ALL AMOUNTS ARE IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
The Scotts Company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of lawn care
and garden products. The Company's major customers include mass
merchandisers, home improvement centers, large hardware chains,
independent hardware stores, nurseries, garden centers, food and drug
stores, golf courses, professional sports stadiums, lawn and landscape
service companies, commercial nurseries and greenhouses, and specialty
crop growers. The Company's products are sold in the United States,
Canada, Europe, the Caribbean, South America, Southeast Asia, the Middle
East, Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Japan, and several Latin
American countries.
Organization and Basis of Presentation
The condensed, consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
The Scotts Company ("Scotts") and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
"Company"). All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
The condensed, consolidated balance sheets and the related condensed,
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows as of and for the
applicable three and nine month periods ended July 3, 1999 and July 4,
1998 are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, such financial
statements contain all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of
the Company's financial position and results of operations. Interim
results reflect all normal recurring adjustments and are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. The interim financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
accompanying notes in Scotts' fiscal 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying disclosures. The most significant
of these estimates are related to the allowance for doubtful accounts,
inventory valuation reserves, expected useful lives assigned to property,
plant and equipment and goodwill and other intangible assets, legal and
environmental liabilities, post-retirement benefits, promotional and
consumer rebate liabilities, commissions from agency agreement, income
taxes and contingencies. Although these estimates are based on
management's best knowledge of current events and actions that may occur
in the future, actual results ultimately may differ from these estimates.
Advertising and Promotion
The Company advertises its branded products through national and regional
media, and through cooperative advertising programs with retailers.
Retailers are also offered pre-season stocking and in-store promotional
allowances. Certain products are also promoted with direct consumer
rebate programs. Advertising and promotion costs (including allowances
and rebates) incurred during the year are generally expensed ratably to
interim periods in relation to revenues. All advertising and promotion
costs, except for production costs, are expensed within the fiscal year
in which such costs are incurred. Production costs for advertising
programs are deferred until the period in which the advertising is first
aired.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when products are shipped to customers, except for
certain large multi-location customers, for which revenue is recognized
when products are shipped to intermediate locations and ownership
6
<PAGE> 7
is acknowledged by the customer. Reserves for estimated returns and
allowances are recorded at the time of shipment.
Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill arising from business acquisitions is amortized over its
estimated useful life, which is generally 40 years, on a straight-line
basis. Intangible assets also consist of patents, trademarks and debt
issuance costs. Patents and trademarks are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over periods varying from 7 to 40 years. Debt
issuance costs are being amortized over the terms of the various
agreements.
Management periodically assesses the recoverability of property and
equipment, goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets by
determining whether the amortization of such assets over the remaining
lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted net cash flows
produced by such assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid financial instruments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior periods' financial
statements to conform to fiscal 1999 classifications.
2. AGENCY AGREEMENT
Effective September 30, 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with
Monsanto Company ("Monsanto") for exclusive international marketing and
agency rights to Monsanto's consumer Roundup(R) herbicide products. In
connection with the agreement, the Company paid a $32.0 million deferred
marketing fee that is being amortized over 20 years. The agreement covers
most major consumer lawn and garden markets in the world, including the
U.S., Canada, Germany, France, other parts of continental Europe, and
Australia.
The agreement provides for the Company to earn a commission based on the
EBIT (as defined by the agreement) generated annually by the global
consumer Roundup(R) business. The Company records its estimated
commission based upon the actual EBIT of the Roundup(R) business for the
periods presented, net of annual fixed contribution payments to Monsanto.
3. ACQUISITIONS
Effective January 1999, the Company acquired the assets of Monsanto's
consumer lawn and garden businesses, exclusive of the Roundup(R) business
("Ortho"), for approximately $300 million, subject to adjustment based on
working capital as of the closing date and as defined in the purchase
agreement. The Company is currently in negotiations with Monsanto to
agree on the working capital amounts as of the closing date.
Effective October 1998, the Company acquired Rhone-Poulenc Jardin
("RPJ"), continental Europe's largest consumer lawn and garden products
company. The final purchase price, established subsequent to
post-acquisition working capital adjustments, was approximately $162
million as compared to management's original estimate of approximately
$216 million.
Effective February 1998, the Company acquired all the shares of EarthGro,
Inc. ("EarthGro"), a regional growing media company located in
Glastonbury, Connecticut, for approximately $47.0 million.
Effective December 1997, the Company acquired all the shares of Levington
Group Limited ("Levington"), a leading producer of consumer and
professional lawn fertilizer and growing media in the U.K., for
approximately $94.0 million.
During fiscal 1999 and 1998, the Company also invested in or acquired
other entities consistent with its long-term strategic plan. These
investments include Asef Holding BV, Scotts Lawn Service, Sanford
Scientific, Inc. and certain intangible assets acquired in Ireland.
Each of the above acquisitions was made in exchange for cash or notes
from the seller and was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the purchase prices have been allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values at the date of acquisition. Final allocations of
7
<PAGE> 8
the purchase prices to acquired net assets associated with the Ortho and
RPJ acquisitions are expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 1999; the excess of the purchase price over the net book value of
acquired assets is currently recorded on the balance sheet as an
intangible asset and is being amortized over a period of 35 years,
subject to adjustment based on final purchase price allocations.
Intangible assets associated with the purchase of EarthGro and Levington
were $23.3 million and $62.8 million, respectively. Intangible assets
associated with the other acquisitions mentioned above, exclusive of RPJ
and Ortho, are approximately $37.0 million on a combined basis.
The following unaudited pro forma results of operations give effect to
the Ortho, RPJ, Earthgro, and Levington acquisitions and the Roundup(R)
Agency Agreement as if they had occurred on October 1, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------
JULY 4, JULY 3,
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $1,436.5 $1,270.8
Income before extraordinary loss 72.2 68.7
Net income 66.4 68.0
Basic earnings per share:
Before extraordinary loss $ 3.55 $ 3.28
After extraordinary loss 3.23 3.24
Diluted earnings per share
Before extraordinary loss $ 2.37 $ 2.27
After extraordinary loss 2.18 2.25
</TABLE>
The pro forma information provided does not purport to be indicative of
actual results of operations if the Ortho, RPJ, Earthgro, and Levington
acquisitions, and the Roundup(R) Agency Agreement, had occurred as of
October 1, 1997, and is not intended to be indicative of future results
or trends.
4. INVENTORIES
Inventories, net of provisions for slow moving and obsolete items of
$22.0 million, $8.7 million and $12.0 million, respectively, consisted
of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 3, JULY 4, SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN MILLIONS) 1999 1998 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Finished goods $206.6 $107.0 $121.0
Raw materials 74.1 56.6 55.8
------ ------ ------
FIFO cost 280.7 163.6 176.8
LIFO reserve 0.4 1.7 0.9
------ ------ ------
Total $281.1 $165.3 $177.7
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 3, JULY 4, SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN MILLIONS) 1999 1998 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Goodwill $619.5 $265.9 $268.1
Trademarks 137.1 144.6 144.0
Other 43.4 25.1 23.0
------ ------ ------
Total $800.0 $435.6 $435.1
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE> 9
6. LONG-TERM DEBT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 3, JULY 4, SEPTEMBER
(IN MILLIONS) 1999 1998 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revolving loans under credit facility $ 16.8 $215.9 $253.5
Term loans under credit facility 500.6 -- --
Senior subordinated notes 320.5 99.5 99.5
Notes due to sellers 37.9 5.4 5.6
Foreign term loans 9.0 9.0 9.0
Capital lease obligations and other 12.0 6.6 4.9
------ ------ ------
896.8 336.4 372.5
Less current portions 41.2 4.4 13.3
------ ------ ------
$855.6 $332.0 $359.2
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
On December 4, 1998, Scotts and certain of its subsidiaries entered into
a new credit facility which provides for borrowings in the aggregate
principal amount of $1.025 billion and consists of term loan facilities
in the aggregate amount of $525 million and a revolving credit facility
in the amount of $500 million. Proceeds from borrowings under the new
credit facility of approximately $241.0 million were used to repay
amounts outstanding under the then existing credit facility. The Company
recorded a $0.4 million extraordinary loss, net of tax, in connection
with the retirement of the old facility.
Aggregate gross borrowings and gross repayments under the Company's
revolving credit facilities were approximately $678 million and $662
million, respectively, for the nine months ended July 3, 1999.
The term loan facilities consist of three tranches. The Tranche A Term
Loan Facility consists of three sub-tranches of French Francs, German
Deutschemarks and British Pounds Sterling in an aggregate principal
amount of $265 million which are to be repaid quarterly over a 6 1/2 year
period. The Tranche B Term Loan Facility is a 7 1/2 year term loan
facility in an aggregate principal amount of $140 million, which is to be
repaid in nominal quarterly installments for the first 6 1/2 years and in
substantial quarterly installments in the final year. The Tranche C Term
Loan Facility is a 8 1/2 year term loan facility in an aggregate
principal amount of $120 million, which is to be repaid in nominal
quarterly installments for the first 7 1/2 years and in substantial
quarterly installments in the final year.
The revolving credit facility provides for borrowings up to $500 million,
which are available on a revolving basis over a term of 6 1/2 years. A
portion of the revolving credit facility not to exceed $100 million is
available for the issuance of letters of credit. A portion of the
facility not to exceed $225 million is available for borrowings in
optional currencies, including German Deutschemarks, British Pounds
Sterling, French Francs, Belgian Francs, Italian Lira and other specified
currencies, provided that the outstanding revolving loans in optional
currencies other than British Pounds Sterling does not exceed $120
million. The outstanding principal amount of all revolving credit loans
may not exceed $150 million for at least 30 consecutive days during any
calendar year.
Interest rates and commitment fees pursuant to the new credit facility
vary according to the Company's leverage ratios and also within tranches.
In addition, the new credit facility requires that the Company enter into
hedge agreements to the extent necessary to provide that at least 50% of
the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes and term
loan facilities is subject to a fixed interest rate. Financial covenants
include minimum net worth, interest coverage and net leverage ratios.
Other covenants include limitations on indebtedness, liens, mergers,
consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions, sale of assets, leases,
dividends, capital expenditures, and investments, among others.
Approximately $12.6 million of financing costs associated with the new
credit facility have been deferred as of July 3, 1999 and are being
amortized over a period of approximately 7 years.
In January 1999, Scotts completed an offering of $330 million of 8
5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes ("the Notes") due 2009. The net proceeds
from the offering, together with borrowings under Scotts' credit
facility, were used to fund the Ortho acquisition and to repurchase
approximately 97% of Scotts $100.0
9
<PAGE> 10
million outstanding 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due August 2004. The
Company recorded an extraordinary loss before tax on the extinguishment
of the 9 7/8% notes of approximately $9.2 million, including a call
premium of $7.1 million and the write-off of unamortized issuance costs
and discounts of $2.1 million. Approximately $11.2 million of issuance
costs associated with the Notes have been deferred as of July 3, 1999 and
are being amortized over the term of the Notes.
The Company entered into two interest rate locks in fiscal 1998 to
hedge its anticipated interest rate exposure on the Notes offering. The
total amount paid under the interest rate locks of $12.9 million has been
recorded as a reduction of the Notes' carrying value and is being
amortized over the life of the Notes as interest expense.
In conjunction with the acquisitions of RPJ and Sanford Scientific, notes
were issued for certain portions of the total purchase price that are to
be paid in annual installments over a four-year period. The present value
of remaining note payments are $32.7 million and $4.6 million,
respectively. The Company is imputing interest on the non-interest
bearing notes using an interest rate prevalent for similar instruments at
the time of acquisition.
The foreign term loans, which were issued on December 12, 1997, have an
8-year term and bear interest at 1% below LIBOR. The loans are
denominated in Pounds Sterling and can be redeemed, on demand, by the
note holder.
7. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and
diluted earnings per common share ("EPS").
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS NINE MONTHS
ENDED ENDED
----- -----
JULY 3, JULY 4, JULY 3, JULY 4,
1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income before extraordinary item $41.6 $24.4 $86.3 $52.3
Extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt, net of taxes -- -- 5.8 0.7
----- ----- ----- -----
Net income 41.6 24.4 80.5 51.6
Preferred stock dividends 2.4 2.4 7.3 7.3
----- ----- ----- -----
Income applicable to common shareholders $39.2 $22.0 $73.2 $44.3
----- ----- ----- -----
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding during the period 18.3 18.7 18.3 18.7
Assuming conversion of Class A
Convertible Preferred Stock 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3
Assuming exercise of warrants 1.2 0.9 1.0 0.6
Assuming exercise of options 1.1 0.7 0.9 0.7
----- ----- ----- -----
Weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding and potential
common shares 30.9 30.6 30.5 30.3
Basic earnings per common share:
Before extraordinary loss $2.14 $1.18 $4.32 $2.41
Extraordinary loss, net of taxes -- -- 0.32 0.04
----- ----- ----- -----
$2.14 $1.18 $4.00 $2.37
----- ----- ----- -----
Diluted earnings per common share:
Before extraordinary loss $1.35 $0.80 $2.83 $1.72
Extraordinary loss, net of taxes -- -- 0.19 0.02
----- ----- ----- -----
$1.35 $0.80 $2.64 $1.70
===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
10
<PAGE> 11
8. STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Effective October 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 130 (SFAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive
Income". SFAS 130 requires that changes in the amounts of certain items,
including foreign currency translation adjustments, be presented in the
Company's financial statements. The components of other comprehensive
income and total comprehensive income for the nine months ended July 3,
1999 and July 4, 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS NINE MONTHS
ENDED ENDED
----- -----
JULY 3, JULY 4, JULY 3, JULY 4,
1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $41.6 $24.4 $80.5 $51.6
Other comprehensive income (expense):
Translation adjustments (2.8) 0.1 (8.0) (1.9)
----- ----- ----- -----
Comprehensive income $38.8 $24.5 $72.5 $49.7
----- ----- ----- -----
</TABLE>
9. CONTINGENCIES
Management continually evaluates the Company's contingencies, including
various lawsuits and claims which arise in the normal course of business,
product and general liabilities, property losses and other fiduciary
liabilities for which the Company maintains self-insured retention. In
the opinion of management, its assessment of contingencies is reasonable
and related reserves, in the aggregate, are adequate; however, there can
be no assurance that future quarterly or annual operating results will
not be materially affected by final resolution of these matters. The
following summarizes the more significant of the Company's identified
contingencies.
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
The Company has assessed and addressed certain environmental issues
regarding the wastewater treatment plants which had operated at the
Marysville facility. The Company decommissioned the old wastewater
treatment plants and has connected the facility's wastewater system with
the City of Marysville's municipal treatment system. Additionally, the
Company has been assessing, under Ohio's Voluntary Action Program
("VAP"), the possible remediation of several discontinued on-site waste
disposal areas dating back to the early operations of its Marysville
facility.
In February 1997, the Company learned that the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency ("OEPA") was referring certain matters relating to
environmental conditions at the Company's Marysville site, including the
existing wastewater treatment plants and the discontinued on-site waste
disposal areas, to the Ohio Attorney General's Office ("OAG").
Representatives from the OEPA, the OAG and the Company continue to meet
to discuss these issues.
In June 1997, the Company received formal notice of an enforcement action
and draft Findings and Orders ("F&O") from the OEPA. The draft F&O
elaborated on the subject of the referral to the OAG alleging: potential
surface water violations relating to possible historical sediment
contamination possibly impacting water quality; inadequate treatment
capabilities of the Company's existing and currently permitted wastewater
treatment plants; and that the Marysville site is subject to corrective
action under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act ("RCRA"). In late
July 1997, the Company received a draft judicial consent order from the
OAG which covered many of the same issues contained in the draft F&O
including RCRA corrective action. As a result of ongoing discussions, the
Company received a revised draft of a judicial consent order from the OAG
in late April 1999, which is the focus of current negotiations.
In accordance with the Company's past efforts to enter into Ohio's VAP,
the Company submitted to the OEPA a "Demonstration of Sufficient Evidence
of VAP Eligibility Compliance" on July 8, 1997. Among other issues
contained in the VAP submission was a description of the Company's
ongoing efforts to assess potential environmental impacts of the
discontinued on-site waste disposal areas as well as potential
remediation efforts. Pursuant to the statutes covering VAP, an eligible
participant in the program is not subject to State enforcement
11
<PAGE> 12
actions for those environmental matters being addressed. On October 21,
1997, the Company received a letter from the Director of the OEPA denying
VAP eligibility based upon the timeliness of and completeness of the
submittal. The Company has appealed the Director's action to the
Environmental Review Appeals Commission. No hearing date has been set and
the appeal remains pending.
The Company is continuing to meet with the OAG and the OEPA in an effort
to negotiate an amicable resolution of these issues but is unable at this
stage to predict the outcome of the negotiations. While negotiations have
narrowed the unresolved issues between the Company and the OAG/OEPA,
several critical issues remain the subject of ongoing discussions. The
Company believes that it has viable defenses to the State's enforcement
action, including that it had been proceeding under VAP to address
certain environmental issues, and will assert those defenses in any such
action.
The Company has reserved for its estimate of the probable outcome of
these proceedings. While the Company is unable to predict the ultimate
outcome of this issue, management believes that the outcome will not
differ materially from the amount reserved for. Many of the issues raised
by the State are already being investigated and addressed by the Company
during the normal course of conducting business.
AgrEvo Environmental Health, Inc.
On June 3, 1999, a Complaint was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York, styled AgrEvo Environmental
--------------------
Health, Inc. v. Scotts Company, Scotts Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. and
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Monsanto Company, in which AgrEvo Environmental Health, Inc. ("AgrEvo")
----------------
seeks damages and injunctive relief for alleged antitrust violations and
breach of contract against Scotts and Scotts Miracle-Gro Products, Inc.
("Miracle-Gro"), and antitrust violations and tortious interference
against Monsanto Company ("Monsanto"). Scotts purchased a herbicide
business from AgrEvo in May 1998. AgrEvo claims in the suit that Scotts'
subsequent agreement to become Monsanto's exclusive sales and marketing
agent for Monsanto's consumer Roundup(R) business, violated the federal
antitrust laws. AgrEvo contends that Monsanto attempted to or did
monopolize the market for non-selective herbicides and conspired with
Scotts to eliminate the competing residential non-selective herbicide
Scotts previously purchased from AgrEvo, in order to achieve or maintain
a monopoly position in that market. AgrEvo also contends that Scotts'
execution of various agreements with Monsanto, including the Roundup(R)
Agency Agreement, as well as Scotts' subsequent actions, violated various
agreements between AgrEvo and Scotts.
AgrEvo is requesting unspecified damages as well as affirmative
injunctive relief, and is seeking to have the court invalidate the
Roundup(R) agency agreement as violative of the federal antitrust laws.
The Company intends to vigorously defend against this action. Pursuant to
the indemnification provisions of the Roundup(R) agency agreement,
Monsanto and Scotts each have requested that the other indemnify it
against any losses arising from this lawsuit. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of these proceedings on its future
results of operations and financial condition.
Lafayette
In July 1990, the Philadelphia District of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers ("Corps") directed that peat harvesting operations be
discontinued at the Company's Lafayette, New Jersey facility, based on
its contention that peat harvesting and related activities result in the
"discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States"
and therefore require a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
In May 1992, the United States filed suit in the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Jersey seeking a permanent injunction against such
harvesting, and civil penalties in an unspecified amount. If the Corps'
position is upheld, it is possible that further harvesting of peat from
this facility would be prohibited. The Company is defending this suit and
is asserting a right to recover its economic losses resulting from the
government's actions. The suit was placed in administrative suspense
during fiscal 1996 in order to allow the Company and the government an
opportunity to negotiate a settlement, and it remains suspended while the
parties develop, exchange and evaluate technical data. In July 1997, the
Company's wetlands consultant submitted to the government a draft
remediation plan. Comments were received, and a revised plan was
submitted in early 1998. Further comments from the government were
received during 1998. The Company believes agreement on the remediation
plan has essentially been reached. Before this suit can be fully
resolved, however, the Company and the government must reach agreement on
the government's civil penalty demand. Management does not believe that
the outcome of this case will have a material adverse effect on the
Company's operations or its financial condition. Furthermore, management
believes the Company has sufficient raw material supplies available such
that service to customers will not be materially adversely affected by
continued closure of this peat harvesting operation.
Hershberger
In September 1991, the Company was identified by the OEPA as a
Potentially Responsible Party ("PRP") with respect to a site in Union
County, Ohio (the "Hershberger site"), because the Company allegedly
arranged for the transportation, treatment or disposal of waste that
allegedly contained hazardous substances, at the Hershberger site.
Effective February 1998, the Company and four other named PRPs executed
an Administrative Order on Consent ("AOC") with the OEPA, by which the
named PRPs funded remedial action at the Hershberger site. After
construction of the leachate collection system and reconstruction of the
landfill cap, which was substantially completed in August 1998, the
Company expects its future obligation will consist primarily of its
12
<PAGE> 13
share of annual operating and maintenance expenses. Management does not
believe that its obligations under the AOC will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Bramford
In the U.K. (United Kingdom), major discharges of waste to air, water and
land are regulated by The Environment Agency (the "EA"). The Scotts (UK)
Ltd. fertilizer facility in Bramford, (Suffolk), U.K., is subject to
environmental regulation by the EA. Two manufacturing processes at this
facility require process authorizations and previously required a waste
management license (discharge to a licensed waste disposal lagoon having
ceased in July 1999). The Company expects to surrender the waste
management license in consultation with the EA. In connection with the
renewal of an authorization, the EA has identified the need for
remediation of the lagoon, and the potential for remediation of a former
landfill at the site. The Company intends to comply with the reasonable
remediation concerns of the EA, including removal of any contaminated
materials from the lagoon. The Company previously installed an
environmental enhancement to the facility to the satisfaction of the EA,
and believes that it has adequately addressed the remediation concerns of
the EA. Management does not believe that its remedial obligations at this
site will have a material adverse effect on the operations at the
facility or on the Company's results of operations or financial
condition.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information". SFAS No. 131 establishes
standards for the way that public enterprises report information about
operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those
enterprises report selected information about operating segments in
interim financial reports issued to shareholders commencing in the year
after adoption. SFAS No. 131 defines business segments as components of
an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and
used internally for evaluating segment performance and decision making on
resource allocations. SFAS No. 131 requires reporting a measure of
segment profit or loss, certain specific revenue and expense items, and
segment assets; and other reporting about geographic and customer
matters. SFAS No. 131 is effective for financial statements for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company plans to adopt SFAS
No. 131 in fiscal 1999.
In February 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosure
about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits." SFAS No. 132 revises
employers' disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefit
plans. It does not change the measurement or recognition of assets,
liabilities, or charges associated with those plans. It standardizes the
disclosure requirements for pensions and other postretirement benefits to
the extent practicable, requires additional information on changes in the
benefit obligations and fair values of plan assets that will facilitate
financial analysis, and eliminates certain disclosures that are no longer
useful. SFAS No. 132 is effective for financial statements for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company plans to adopt SFAS
No. 132 in fiscal 1999.
In August 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting For Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging
activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and
measure those instruments at fair value. The Company has not yet
determined the impact this statement will have on its operating results.
SFAS No. 133 (as amended) is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2000. The Company plans to adopt SFAS No. 133 in fiscal 2001.
13
<PAGE> 14
11. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
1999 CHARGES
Restructuring and other charges totaled $1.4 million in the first nine
months of fiscal 1999. These charges consist of severance costs
associated with management's first quarter 1999 decision to reorganize
the North American Professional Business Group to strengthen distribution
and technical sale support, integrate brand management across market
segments and reduce annual operating expenses. As of July 3, 1999, the
Company had terminated 57 employees and had made approximately $1.0
million of the anticipated severance payments. The Company anticipates
that the remaining $0.4 million of severance costs will be paid in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 or in fiscal 2000.
1998 CHARGES
During fiscal 1998, the Company recorded $20.4 million of restructuring
and other charges. These charges consist of the following: (1) $6.0
million for consolidation of the Company's two U.K. operations into one
lower-cost business; (2) $9.3 million for the closure of nine composting
operations in the U.S. that collect yard and compost waste for certain
municipalities; and (3) $5.1 million for the sale or closure of certain
other U.S. plants and businesses. The Company expects that these
restructuring efforts will be completed during fiscal 1999, except as
noted otherwise below. A detailed discussion of each component of the
restructuring charge follows:
Consolidation of UK Operations:
-------------------------------
In connection with management's decision in the second quarter of fiscal
1998 to consolidate the Company's two U.K. operations (Miracle Garden
Care and Levington), the Company recorded the following charges:
1. $0.9 million to write-off the remaining carrying value of certain
property and equipment to be disposed of. The primary assets
written-off were: a) production equipment at the Company's
existing factory in Howden as a result of transferring production
lines to the newly acquired Levington factory in Bramford and b)
previously utilized hardware and software as a result of
management's decision to utilize the acquired information systems
of the Levington business. The Company ceased utilization and
abandoned the plant assets and computer equipment in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1998. The charges associated with these
write-offs were $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The
Company also recorded a cash charge of $0.2 million for the
demolition of the property and equipment mentioned above.
2. $2.1 million for post-consolidation packaging initiatives. The
primary components of the charge include: a) the write-off of
packaging materials rendered obsolete as a result of new packaging
design and b) cash charges incurred in fiscal 1998 to repackage
and relaunch products under a single branding strategy. The
charges associated with these actions were $0.8 million and $1.3
million respectively.
3. $1.4 million of cash severance costs associated with the
termination of 25 employees of the Company's existing UK
operation. Management's decision was approved and notification of
the pending terminations was communicated to the specifically
identified employees in the third quarter of fiscal 1998,
including communication of applicable benefit arrangements. As of
September 30, 1998, six employees had been terminated. An
additional sixteen employees were terminated in the first three
quarters of fiscal 1999, with the remaining terminations scheduled
for the remainder of fiscal 1999.
4. $0.6 million write-off of inventory rendered obsolete by the
consolidation and $0.8 million cash charges for other
integration-related costs.
14
<PAGE> 15
Closure of Compost Sites:
- -------------------------
In connection with management's decision in the fourth quarter of fiscal
1998 to close nine composting sites, the Company recorded the following
charges:
1. $4.5 million cash charge for costs to be incurred under
contractual commitments for which no future revenues will be
realized. These costs are associated with the final processing of
remaining compost materials, as required, through the end of the
operating contract signed with the applicable municipality. These
costs include only those estimated from the time that
revenue-producing activities cease through the end of the
applicable operating contract.
Six of the composting sites have operating contracts that end in
fiscal 1999; the operating contracts for the three remaining sites
expire in fiscal 2000. The Company anticipates that final
processing costs of $2.9 million will be incurred in fiscal 1999
and $1.6 million will be incurred in fiscal 2000.
2. $3.2 million write-down of machinery and equipment for the
estimated remaining book value which will not be recovered
subsequent to the end of revenue producing activities.
Depreciation will continue to be recognized during revenue-
producing periods.
3. $1.1 million write-off of inventory which must be disposed of
during, or subsequent to, revenue-producing periods. Such
inventory must be removed from the applicable sites, and is not
considered sellable by the Company.
4. $0.5 million cash charge to provide for remaining lease
obligations after revenue producing periods for certain machinery
and equipment being leased by the Company at the sites.
The composting facilities being closed as part of these restructuring
initiatives recorded losses included in the Company's consolidated
results of operations of approximately $3.0, $2.0 and $2.0 for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Sale and Closure of Certain U.S. Plants and Businesses:
-------------------------------------------------------
1. $4.5 million for the write-down, to net realizable value, of
assets associated with the Agrevo pesticides business. The Company
elected to divest these assets in order to avoid potential trade
conflicts associated with the Company's purchase of Ortho and
signing of the Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement. The sale of the
Agrevo business was consummated in February 1999. Agrevo
contributed a $0.5 million loss to the Company's fiscal 1999
results from operations prior to the sale of the business.
2. $0.6 million associated with the closure of a single Growing Media
production facility location in New York, the capacity of which
was deemed redundant by management subsequent to the Earthgro
acquisition made in February 1998. The closure of this facility
was completed in September 1998.
15
<PAGE> 16
The following is a summary, as of July 3, 1999, of the fiscal 1998
restructuring charges detailed above.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remaining
Type Classification Amount Payments Reserve
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidation of U.K. Operations:
- ---------------------------------
Property and equipment demolition Cash Restructuring $0.2 $0.0 $0.2
Repackaging and relaunch Cash SG&A $1.3 $0.9 $0.4
Severance charges Cash Restructuring $1.4 $1.1 $0.3
Other integration costs Cash SG&A $0.8 $0.8 $0.0
---- ---- ----
Total cash charges $3.7 $2.8 $0.9
---- ---- ----
Property and equipment write-offs Non-cash Restructuring $0.9
Obsolete packaging write-offs Non-cash Cost of Sales $0.8
Other inventory write-offs Non-cash Cost of Sales $0.6
----
Total non-cash charges $2.3
----
Closure of Compost Sites:
- -------------------------
Costs under contractual commitments Cash Restructuring $4.5 $2.4 $2.1
Lease obligations Cash Restructuring $0.5 $0.0 $0.5
---- ---- ----
Total cash charges $5.0 $2.4 $2.6
---- ---- ----
Property and equipment write-offs Non-cash Restructuring $3.2
Inventory write-offs Non-cash Cost of Sales $1.1
----
Total non-cash charges $4.3
----
Other Businesses/ Plants
- ------------------------
Sale of Agrevo business Non-cash Restructuring $4.5
Property and equipment write-offs Non-cash Restructuring $0.2
Inventory write-offs Non-cash Cost of Sales $0.4
----
Total $5.1
----
</TABLE>
There have been no adjustments made to the restructuring reserves in
fiscal 1999.
The substantial majority of the remaining UK payments or write-offs are
expected to be made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999. The substantial
majority of the remaining compost contractual commitments will be paid in
fiscal 2000.
16
<PAGE> 17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(ALL AMOUNTS ARE IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED)
OVERVIEW
The Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer branded products
for lawn and garden care, professional turf care and professional horticulture
businesses in the United States and Europe. The Company's operations are divided
into three business segments: North American Consumer, Professional and
International. The North American Consumer segment includes the Lawns, Gardens,
Growing Media and Ortho business groups.
The Company's sales are seasonal in nature and are susceptible to global weather
conditions, primarily in North America and Europe. For instance, periods of wet
weather can slow fertilizer sales but can create increased demand for pesticide
sales. Periods of dry, hot weather can have the opposite effect on fertilizer
and pesticide sales. The Company believes that its recent acquisitions diversify
both its product line risk and geographic risk to weather conditions.
On September 30, 1998, the Company entered into a long-term Exclusive Agency and
Marketing Agreement (the "Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement") with Monsanto for its
consumer Roundup(R) herbicide products. Under the Marketing Agreement, the
Company and Monsanto will jointly develop global consumer and trade marketing
programs for Roundup(R), and the Company has assumed responsibility for sales
support, merchandising, distribution, logistics and certain administrative
functions.
In addition, on January 21, 1999, the Company consummated the acquisition of the
assets of Monsanto Company's consumer lawn and garden businesses, exclusive of
the Roundup(R) business. These transactions with Monsanto will further the
Company's strategic objective of entering the pesticides segment of the consumer
lawn and garden category. These businesses make up the newly created Ortho
business group within the North American Consumer segment.
Over the past two years, the Company has made several other acquisitions to
strengthen its global market position in the lawn and garden category. In
October 1998, the Company acquired Rhone-Poulenc Jardin ("RPJ"). RPJ is a
leading European consumer lawn and garden business. The RPJ acquisition provides
a significant addition to the Company's existing European platform and
strengthens its foothold in the continental European consumer lawn and garden
market. Through this acquisition, the Company will establish a strong presence
in France, Germany, Austria, and the Benelux countries. The RPJ acquisition may
also mitigate, to a certain extent, the Company's susceptibility to weather
conditions by expanding the regions in which the Company operates.
In February 1998, the Company acquired EarthGro, Inc. ("Earthgro") a
Northeastern U.S. growing media producer. In December 1997, the Company acquired
Levington Group Limited ("Levington"), a leading producer of consumer and
professional lawn fertilizer and growing media in the United Kingdom. In January
1997, the Company acquired the approximate two-thirds interest in Miracle
Holdings Limited ("Miracle Holdings") which the Company did not already own.
Miracle Holdings owns Miracle Garden Care Limited ("MGC"), a manufacturer and
distributor of lawn and garden products in the United Kingdom. These
acquisitions are consistent with the Company's stated objective of becoming the
world's foremost branded lawn and garden company.
In addition, on December 15, 1998, the Company acquired Asef Holding B.V., a
privately-held Netherlands-based lawn and garden products company.
Management believes that the acquisitions will provide the Company with several
strategic benefits including immediate market penetration, geographic expansion,
brand leveraging opportunities, and the achievement of substantial cost savings.
The Company is currently a leader in four segments of the consumer lawn and
garden category: lawn fertilizer, garden fertilizer, growing media and grass
seeds. The acquisition of Ortho and the Marketing Agreement for Roundup(R) will
provide the Company with an immediate entry into the fifth segment of the
consumer lawn and garden category: the U.S. pesticides segment. The addition of
the U.S. pesticides product line completes the Company's product portfolio and
positions the Company as the only national company with a complete offering of
consumer products for lawn and garden care.
17
<PAGE> 18
The addition of strong pesticide brands completes the Company's product
portfolio of powerful branded consumer lawn and garden products that should
provide the Company with brand leveraging opportunities for revenue growth. For
example, the Company's strengthened market position should create category
management opportunities to enhance shelf positioning, consumer communication,
trade incentives and trade programs. In addition, significant synergies should
be realized from the combined businesses, including reductions in general and
administrative, sales, distribution, purchasing, research and development, and
corporate overhead costs. Management expects to redirect a portion of these cost
savings into increased consumer marketing spending in support of the Ortho
brand.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated results of operations,
cash flows and financial position of the Company should be read in conjunction
with the Condensed, Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included
elsewhere in this report. Scotts' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998 includes additional information about the Company, its
operations, and its financial position, and should be read in conjunction with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The following table sets forth sales by business segment for the three and nine
months ended July 3, 1999 and July 4, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED PERIOD NINE MONTHS ENDED PERIOD
JULY 3, JULY 4, TO PERIOD JULY 3, JULY 4, TO PERIOD
1999 1998 CHANGE 1999 1998 CHANGE
---- ---- ------ ---- ---- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consumer Lawns $109.2 $ 89.5 22.0% $ 394.0 $311.6 26.4%
Consumer Gardens 60.0 57.2 4.9 137.8 123.5 11.6
Consumer Growing Media 136.1 116.1 17.2 235.7 202.7 16.3
Consumer Ortho 121.6 na na 191.2 na na
------ ------ -------- ------
Domestic Consumer 426.9 262.8 62.4 958.7 637.8 50.3
Professional 35.8 44.1 (18.8) 109.2 121.0 (9.8)
International 123.5 60.1 105.5 334.3 163.1 105.0
------ ------ -------- ------
Consolidated $586.2 $367.0 59.7% $1,402.2 $921.9 52.1%
------ ------ -------- ------
</TABLE>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 3, 1999 VERSUS THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1998
Sales for the three months ended July 3, 1999 totaled $586.2 million, an
increase of 59.7% over the three months ended July 4, 1998 of $367.0 million. On
a pro forma basis, assuming that the Ortho and RPJ acquisitions had occurred on
October 1, 1997, sales for the third quarter of fiscal 1999 increased 11.8% over
pro forma sales for the third quarter of fiscal 1998 of $524.4 million. The
increase in these pro forma sales was driven by improved performance across the
majority of the Company' business groups, especially Consumer Lawns, Growing
Media and International as discussed below.
North American Consumer segment sales were $426.9 million in the third quarter
of fiscal 1999, an increase of $164.1 million, or 62.4%, over sales for the
third quarter of fiscal 1998 of $262.8 million. Sales in the Consumer Lawns
business group within this segment increased $19.7 million, or 22.0%, from
fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, reflecting significant volume growth
period-to-period in the Company's Turf Builder(R) line of products. This volume
growth is responsible for $13.3 million of the increase in sales, while strong
grass seed sales were responsible for another $4.7 million.
Sales in the Consumer Gardens business group increased $2.8 million, or 4.9%,
from the third quarter of fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, primarily due to strong
volume in the Miracle-Gro(R) product line which increased $2.8 million or 5.4%.
Sales in the Consumer Growing Media business group increased $20.0 million, or
17.2%, driven primarily by a $12.8 million increase in sales of higher margin,
value-added potting soil products, a $9.7 million increase in sales of landscape
soils and a $7.8 million increase in sales of bark material products. These
increases were partially offset by a reduction in sales of lower margin
commodity products.
18
<PAGE> 19
Sales for the Ortho business group, acquired in January 1999, were $121.6
million for the third quarter. On a pro forma basis, assuming Ortho had been
acquired effective October 1, 1997, sales for the Ortho business group increased
6.7% in the three month period.
Selling price changes did not have a material impact in the North American
Consumer segment in the third quarter of fiscal 1999.
Professional segment sales of $35.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 1999
were down 18.8% in comparison to the third quarter of fiscal 1998 sales of $44.1
million. Results reflect a decline of approximately $9.0 million in sales of
ProTurf(R) products, partially offset by a slight increase in sales of the
Company's horticultural products. The decrease in ProTurf(R) sales was driven by
short-term interruptions associated with the reorganization of the Professional
business group made to strengthen distribution and technical sales support and
to integrate brand management. The increase in horticultural products stems from
strong sales volume for controlled-release fertilizers used in the nursery and
greenhouse segments.
International segment sales were $123.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal
1999, an increase of $63.4 million, or 105.5% over the third quarter of fiscal
1998. After considering the RPJ and Levington acquisitions, on a pro forma
basis, sales in the International segment increased 19.3% from the third quarter
of fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, primarily the result of a $6.0 million pro forma
increase in the RPJ businesses as well as a $7.5 million improvement in the
European professional business. Also adding to the increase were $7.0 million in
sales contributed by the Company's less significant acquisitions of ASEF
Holding, B.V. and certain operations in Ireland. The international improvements
are net of a $4.6 million adverse impact of foreign currency translation.
Excluding the effects of currency translation, pro forma sales would have been
23.8% higher than the third quarter of the prior year.
Gross profit increased to $236.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 1999, an
increase of 80.0% over fiscal 1998 gross profit of $131.3 million. As a
percentage of sales, gross profit was 40.3% of sales for fiscal 1999 compared to
38.9% of sales for the third quarter of fiscal 1998 on a pro forma basis. This
slight increase was primarily due to favorable raw material prices, improved
manufacturing efficiencies and the following items which negatively impacted
fiscal 1998 margins: start-up costs of $0.3 million associated with the upgrade
of certain domestic manufacturing facilities, demolition costs of $0.8 million
associated with the removal of certain old manufacturing facilities, unplanned
outsourcing of certain production of $0.5 million, the loss of a composting
contract of $0.5 million and unfavorable inventory adjustments of $0.8 million.
The "commission earned from agency agreement" of $9.9 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 1999 was generated from the Company's agreement with Monsanto
for exclusive international marketing and agency rights to Monsanto's consumer
Roundup(R) herbicide products. The agreement provides for the Company to earn a
commission based on EBIT (as defined by the agreement) generated annually, net
of an annual fixed contribution payment, by the global consumer Roundup(R)
business. The $9.9 million recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 1999
represents the Company's estimated commission based upon the actual EBIT of the
Roundup(R) business for the period.
Advertising and promotion expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 1999 were
$63.8 million, an increase of $30.9 million, or 93.9% over fiscal 1998
advertising and promotion expenses of $32.9 million. The newly acquired Ortho
and RPJ businesses contributed $14.2 million and $6.7 million, respectively, to
the increase. The remaining increase reflects continued emphasis on building
consumer demand through consumer-oriented marketing efforts, and is highlighted
by significant increases in advertising and promotion expenses in the Consumer
Lawns, Growing Media, Consumer Gardens and U.K. businesses. As a percentage of
sales, advertising and promotion increased to 10.9% compared to 9.0% for the
prior year.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses in the third quarter of
fiscal 1999 were $79.4 million, an increase of $35.6 million, or 81.3%, over
similar expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 1998 of $43.8 million. As a
percentage of sales, SG&A was 13.5% for the third quarter of fiscal 1999
compared to 11.9% for fiscal 1998. The newly acquired Ortho and RPJ businesses
contributed $17.5 million and $9.2 million, respectively to the increase. The
remaining increase of $8.9 million was primarily due to the following factors:
$1.2 million increase for enterprise system implementation efforts; increased
charges for bad debt expense of $0.6 million; increased charges for management
incentives of $2.2 million; $1.0 million increase for costs associated with the
integration of the acquired businesses; and $1.3 million for increased research
and development costs.
19
<PAGE> 20
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles increased to $8.3 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 1999, compared to $3.5 million in the prior year, due to
additional intangibles resulting from the RPJ and Ortho acquisitions.
Other income/expense for the third quarter of fiscal 1999 was a gain of $0.3
million compared to a loss of $1.3 million in the prior year. The change was
primarily due to lower foreign currency and asset retirement losses, partially
offset by increased legal and environmental costs.
Income from operations for the third quarter of fiscal 1999 was $95.1 million
compared to $49.8 million for the third quarter of fiscal 1998, primarily due to
increases realized from the newly acquired Ortho and RPJ businesses, and
significant improvement in the Consumer Lawns and Growing Media businesses,
partially offset by increased SG&A charges detailed above.
Interest expense for the third quarter of fiscal 1999 was $24.6 million, an
increase of 167.4% over fiscal 1998 interest expense of $9.2 million. The
increase in interest expense was due to increased borrowings to fund the Ortho
and RPJ acquisitions.
Income tax expense was $28.9 million for fiscal 1999 compared to $16.2 million
in the prior year. The Company's effective tax rate was 41.0% in the third
quarter of fiscal 1999 compared to 40.0% in fiscal 1998.
The Company reported net income of $41.6 million for the third quarter of fiscal
1999, or $1.35 per common share on a diluted basis, compared to net income of
$24.4 million for fiscal 1998, or $0.80 per common share. On a pro forma basis,
diluted earnings per common share was $1.39 in the third quarter of the prior
year.
NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 3, 1999 VERSUS NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1998
Sales for the nine months ended July 3, 1999 totaled $1.4 billion, an increase
of 52.1% over the nine months ended July 4, 1998 of $921.9 million. On a pro
forma basis, assuming that the Ortho, RPJ, Levington and Earthgro acquisitions
had occurred on October 1, 1997, sales for the nine months of fiscal 1999 of
$1.4 billion increased 13.0% over pro forma sales for the nine months of fiscal
1998 of $1.3 billion. The increase in these pro forma sales was driven by
improved performance in all of the Company's consumer business groups and the
International business group as discussed below.
North American Consumer segment sales were $958.7 million for the nine months of
fiscal 1999, an increase of $320.9 million, or 50.3%, over sales for the nine
months of fiscal 1998 of $637.8 million. Sales in the Consumer Lawns business
group within this segment increased $82.4 million, or 26.4%, from fiscal 1998 to
fiscal 1999, reflecting significant volume growth period-to-period in the
Company's Turf Builder(R) line of products. This volume growth is responsible
for $62.7 million of the increase in sales, while strong grass seed and spreader
sales were responsible for another $8.1 million and $7.5 million, respectively.
Sales in the Consumer Gardens business group increased $14.3 million, or 11.6%,
from the nine months of fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, primarily due to strong
volume in the Miracle-Gro(R) product line which increased $12.5 million or
11.3%.
Sales in the Consumer Growing Media business group increased $33.0 million, or
16.3%, partially the result of the Earthgro acquisition made in February of
fiscal 1998. On a pro forma basis, including the Earthgro acquisition, sales in
the Consumer Growing Media business group increased 12.7% from the nine months
of fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, driven primarily by a $22.3 million increase in
sales of higher margin, value-added potting soil products, a $11.9 million
increase in sales of landscape soils and a $12.8 million increase in sales of
bark material products. These inceases were partially offset by a reduction in
sales of lower margin commodity products.
Sales for the Ortho business group, acquired in January 1999, were $191.2
million for the post-acquisition period. On a pro forma basis, assuming Ortho
had been acquired effective October 1, 1997, sales for the Ortho business group
increased 9.4% in the nine month period.
20
<PAGE> 21
Selling price changes did not have a material impact in the North American
Consumer segment in the nine months of fiscal 1999.
Professional segment sales of $109.2 million in fiscal 1999 were down 9.8% in
comparison to the nine months of fiscal 1998 sales of $121.0 million. Results
reflect a decline of approximately $19 million in sales of ProTurf(R) products,
partially offset by an increase of approximately $7 million in sales of the
Company's horticultural products. The decrease in ProTurf(R) sales was driven by
short-term interruptions associated with the reorganization of the Professional
business group made to strengthen distribution and technical sales support and
to integrate brand management. The increase in horticultural products stems from
strong sales volume for controlled-release fertilizers used in the nursery and
greenhouse segments.
International segment sales were $334.3 million in the nine months of fiscal
1999, an increase of $171.2 million, or 105% over the nine months of fiscal
1998. After considering the RPJ and Levington acquisitions, on a pro forma
basis, sales in the International segment increased 11.6% from the nine months
of fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, primarily the result of a $24.2 million pro forma
increase in the RPJ businesses as well as a $14.7 million improvement in the
European professional business. Also adding to the increase were approximately
$15 million in sales contributed by the Company's less significant acquisitions
of ASEF Holding, B.V. and certain operations in Ireland. These improvements were
partially offset by a $20 million proforma decrease in sales for the group's
U.K. businesses caused by slower than anticipated orders and supply chain
interruptions resulting from the integration of the recently acquired
businesses. Excluding the effects of currency translation, pro forma sales would
have been 12.1% higher than the nine months of the prior year.
Gross profit increased to $570.1 million in the nine months of fiscal 1999, an
increase of 66.2% over fiscal 1998 gross profit of $343.1 million. On a pro
forma basis, gross profit as a percentage of sales was 39.9% for fiscal 1999
compared to 38.7% of sales for the nine months of fiscal 1998, primarily due to
improved raw material costs, improved manufacturing efficiencies, and the
following items which had adverse impacts on fiscal 1998 margins: start-up costs
of $1.1 million associated with the upgrade of certain domestic manufacturing
facilities, demolition costs of $1.4 million associated with the removal of
certain old manufacturing facilities, unplanned outsourcing of certain
production of $2.7 million, the loss of a composting contract of $0.6 million
and unfavorable inventory adjustments of $0.8 million.
The "commission earned from agency agreement" of $27.5 million in the nine
months of fiscal 1999 was generated from the Company's agreement with Monsanto
for exclusive international marketing and agency rights to Monsanto's consumer
Roundup(R) herbicide products. The agreement provides for the Company to earn a
commission based on EBIT (as defined by the agreement) generated annually, net
of an annual fixed contribution payment, by the global Roundup(R) business. The
$27.5 million recorded in the nine months of fiscal 1999 represents the
Company's estimated commission based upon the actual EBIT of the Roundup(R)
business for the period.
Advertising and promotion expenses in the nine months of fiscal 1999 were $166.6
million, an increase of $72.7 million, or 77.4%, over fiscal 1998 advertising
and promotion expenses of $93.9 million. The newly acquired Ortho and RPJ
businesses contributed $25.4 million and $17.2 million, respectively, to the
increase. The remaining increase reflects continued emphasis on building
consumer demand through consumer-oriented marketing efforts, and is highlighted
by 27%, 46%, 24% and 27% increases in advertising and promotion expenses in the
Consumer Lawns, Growing Media, Consumer Gardens and U.K. businesses,
respectively. As a percentage of sales, advertising and promotion increased to
11.9% compared to 10.2% for the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses in the nine months of fiscal
1999 were $205.9 million, an increase of $84.0 million, or 68.9% over similar
expenses in the nine months of fiscal 1998 of $121.9 million. As a percentage of
sales, SG&A was 14.7% for the nine months fiscal 1999 compared to 13.2% for
fiscal 1998. The newly acquired Ortho and RPJ businesses contributed $24.5
million and $27.0 million, respectively, to the increase. The significant
components of the remaining $32.5 million increase are as follows: additional
information systems expenses of $1.1 million for year 2000 compliance and $4.4
million for enterprise system implementation efforts; increased charges for bad
debt expense of $3.5 million; increased charges for management incentives of
$3.4 million; increased marketing and selling expenses in the Consumer Lawns
group of $5.3 million; increased costs associated with the integration of newly
acquired businesses of $2.8 million; and an overall increase in research and
development costs of $4.2 million.
21
<PAGE> 22
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles increased to $18.5 million in the
nine months of fiscal 1999, compared to $9.7 million in the prior year, due to
additional intangibles resulting from the Ortho, RPJ, Levington and Earthgro
acquisitions.
Other income/expense for the nine months of fiscal 1999 was a gain of $0.1
million compared to a loss of $2.7 million in the prior year. The change was
primarily due to lower foreign currency and asset retirement losses, partially
offset by increased legal and environmental costs. Approximately $1.3 million of
the increase in environmental provisions recorded in fiscal 1999 were made to
update management's estimate of the probable outcome of on-going proceedings
with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. See further discussion of said
litigation in Note 9 to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income from operations for the nine months of fiscal 1999 was $205.3 million
compared to $114.9 million for the nine months of fiscal 1998, primarily due to
increases realized from the newly acquired Ortho and RPJ businesses and
significant improvement in the Consumer Lawns business, partially offset by
increased SG&A charges detailed above.
Interest expense for the nine months of fiscal 1999 was $59.0 million, an
increase of 129.6% over fiscal 1998 interest expense of $25.7 million. The
increase in interest expense was due to increased borrowings to fund the Ortho,
RPJ, Levington, and EarthGro acquisitions.
Income tax expense was $60.0 million for fiscal 1999 compared to $36.9 million
in the prior year. The Company's effective tax rate was 41.0% in the nine months
of fiscal 1999 compared to 41.4% in fiscal 1998 as a result of favorable tax
planning strategies.
As discussed further in "Liquidity and Capital Resources", in conjunction with
the Ortho acquisition, in January 1999 Scotts completed an offering of $330
million of 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes ("the Notes") due 2009. The net
proceeds from the offering, together with borrowings under Scotts' bank
facility, were used to fund the Ortho acquisition and repurchase approximately
97% of Scotts' $100.0 million outstanding 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due
August 2004. The Company recorded an extraordinary loss before tax on the
extinguishment of the 9 7/8% notes of approximately $9.2 million, including a
call premium of $7.1 million and the write-off of unamortized issuance costs and
discounts of $2.1 million.
The Company reported net income of $80.5 million for the nine months of fiscal
1999, or $2.64 per common share on a diluted basis, compared to net income of
$51.6 million for fiscal 1998, or $1.70 per common share. Excluding the impact
of the extraordinary loss discussed above, the Company reported earnings per
share of $2.83 per share on a diluted basis as compared to $1.72 in the prior
year. On a pro forma basis, diluted earnings per common share before
extraordinary items increased to $2.37 as compared to $2.27 in the nine months
of the prior year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $90.5 million for the nine months
ended July 3, 1999 compared to $93.0 million for the nine months ended July 4,
1998. The seasonal nature of the Company's operations generally requires cash to
fund significant increases in certain components of working capital (primarily
inventory and accounts receivable) during the first and second quarters. The
third fiscal quarter is a significant period for collecting accounts receivable
and liquidating inventory levels.
Cash used in investing activities totaled $540.8 million for the nine months
ended July 3, 1999 as compared to $168.1 million in the prior year. This
increase was primarily due to the cost of the Ortho, RPJ and Asef acquisitions
during the period. Additionally, capital investments were $37.9 million in the
nine months of fiscal 1999, a $16.2 increase in comparison to the prior year.
The increase in capital investments is primarily due to cost associated with the
Enterprise Resource Planning project of $15.6 million. The Company's new credit
facilities (as described below) restrict annual capital investments to $70.0
million.
Financing activities generated cash of $474.9 million for the nine months ended
July 3, 1999 compared to $91.8 million in the prior year. Cash generated in the
first nine months of fiscal 1999 was generally provided by the Company's new
$1.025 billion credit facility and the January 1999 Senior Subordinated Notes
offering of $330 million. Borrowings were primarily used to provide funds for
the following: Ortho, RPJ and Asef acquisitions,
22
<PAGE> 23
marketing fees associated with the Roundup(R) agency agreement, financing fees
associated with the new credit facility (as discussed below), issuance fees
associated with the Notes offering, payments associated with the then
outstanding interest rate locks (also described below), repurchase of treasury
shares, dividends on Class A Preferred Stock, and the repurchase of
approximately 97% of Scotts' $100.0 million outstanding 9 7/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due August 2004.
Total debt was $896.8 million as of July 3, 1999, an increase of $524.3 million
compared with debt at September 30, 1998 and an increase of $560.4 million
compared with debt levels at July 4, 1998. The increase in debt, period to
period, was primarily due to borrowings made to fund the financing activities
previously mentioned.
The primary sources of liquidity for the Company are funds generated by
operations and borrowings under Scotts' credit facility. On December 4,
1998, Scotts and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a new credit
facility which provides for borrowings in the aggregate principal amount of
$1.025 billion and consists of term loan facilities in the aggregate amount of
$525 million and a revolving credit facility in the amount of $500 million.
Proceeds from borrowings under the new credit facility of approximately $241.0
million were used to repay amounts outstanding under the then existing credit
facility.
The term loan facilities consist of three tranches. The Tranche A Term Loan
Facility consists of three sub-tranches of French Francs, German Deutschemarks
and British Pounds Sterling in an aggregate principal amount of $265 million
which are to be repaid quarterly over a 6 1/2 year period. The Tranche B Term
Loan Facility is a 7 1/2 year term loan facility in an aggregate principal
amount of $140 million, which is to be repaid in nominal quarterly installments
for the first 6 1/2 years and in substantial quarterly installments in the final
year. The Tranche C Term Loan Facility is a 8 1/2 year term loan facility in an
aggregate principal amount of $120 million, which is to be repaid in nominal
quarterly installments for the first 7 1/2 years and in substantial quarterly
installments in the final year.
The revolving credit facility provides for borrowings up to $500 million, which
are available on a revolving basis over a term of 6 1/2 years. A portion of the
revolving credit facility not to exceed $100 million is available for the
issuance of letters of credit. A portion of the facility not to exceed $225
million is available for borrowings in optional currencies, including German
Deutschemarks, British Pounds Sterling, French Francs, Belgian Francs, Italian
Lira and other specified currencies, provided that the outstanding revolving
loans in optional currencies other than British Pounds Sterling does not exceed
$120 million. The outstanding principal amount of all revolving credit loans may
not exceed $150 million for at least 30 consecutive days during any calendar
year.
The Company funded the acquisition of RPJ and Asef with borrowings under the
newly created credit facility. Certain other borrowings under the credit
facility, along with proceeds from the January, 1999 offering of $330 million
of 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009, were used to fund the Ortho
acquisition and to repurchase approximately 97% of Scotts $100.0 million
outstanding 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due August 2004.
The Company entered into two interest rate locks in fiscal 1998 to hedge its
anticipated interest rate exposure on the Notes offering. The total amount paid
under the interest rate locks of $12.9 million has been recorded as a reduction
of the Notes' carrying value and is being amortized over the life of the notes
as interest expense.
In July 1998, the Board of Directors of Scotts, authorized the repurchase of up
to $100 million of Scotts' common shares on the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions on or prior to September 30, 2001 ("the Repurchase
Program"). As of July 3, 1999, approximately 414,000 common shares ($13.3
million) were repurchased under the Repurchase Program. The timing and amount of
any future purchases under the Repurchase Program will be at Scotts' discretion
and will depend upon market conditions and the Company's operating performance
and liquidity. Any repurchase will also be subject to the covenants contained in
the Company's credit facilities as well as its other debt instruments. The
repurchased shares will be held in treasury and will thereafter be used for the
exercise of employee stock options and for other valid corporate purposes. The
Company anticipates that all repurchases will be made in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions, and that the Hagedorn Partnership, L.P. will
sell its pro-rata share (42%) of such repurchased shares in the open market. The
agreement governing the merger transactions with the former shareholders of
Stern's Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. ("the Miracle-Gro shareholders")
23
<PAGE> 24
requires that the they reduce their percentage ownership in the Company to no
more than 44% on a fully diluted basis to the extent that repurchases by the
Company would cause such ownership to exceed 44%.
In the opinion of the Company's management, cash flows from operations and
capital resources will be sufficient to meet debt service and working capital
needs during fiscal 1999, however, the Company cannot ensure that its business
groups will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that currently
anticipated cost savings and operating improvements will be realized on schedule
or at all, or that future borrowings will be available under the newly created
credit facility in amounts sufficient to pay indebtedness or fund other
liquidity needs. The Company cannot ensure that it will be able to refinance any
indebtedness, including the newly created credit facility, on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company is subject to local, state, federal and foreign environmental
protection laws and regulations with respect to its business operations and
believes it is operating in substantial compliance with, or taking action aimed
at ensuring compliance with, such laws and regulations. The Company is involved
in several environmental related legal actions with various governmental
agencies. While it is difficult to quantify the potential financial impact of
actions involving environmental matters, particularly remediation costs at waste
disposal sites and future capital expenditures for environmental control
equipment, in the opinion of management, the ultimate liability arising from
such environmental matters, taking into account established reserves, should not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position; however,
there can be no assurance that future quarterly or annual operating results will
not be materially affected by the resolution of these matters. Additional
information on environmental matters affecting the Company is provided in Note 9
to the Company's Condensed, Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the
nine months ended July 3, 1999 and in the 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K under
the "BUSINESS" and "LEGAL PROCEEDINGS" sections.
YEAR 2000 READINESS
GENERAL
The Company may be impacted by the inability of its computer software
applications and other business systems (e.g., embedded microchips) to properly
identify the Year 2000 due to a commonly used programming convention of using
only two digits to identify a year. Unless modified or replaced, these systems
could fail or create erroneous results when referencing the Year 2000.
Management has assessed the extent and impact of this issue and has implemented
a readiness program to mitigate the possibility of business interruption or
other risks. Substantially all significant business systems are compliant.
Progress is being made on open items that relate to minor systems or equipment
upgrades scheduled for summer plant shutdowns.
The Company has established a Year 2000 Program Office to oversee the readiness
program. The Program Office functions include regular communication with Year
2000 project managers and site visits to the Company's various businesses to
monitor remediation efforts and verify progress toward stated compliance goals.
The Program Office reports to senior management, who in turn reports regularly
to the Scotts' Board of Directors regarding the Company's progress toward Year
2000 readiness.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SYSTEMS
Currently, mainframe computer operations at the Company's Marysville, Ohio
headquarters support all U. S. business groups with the exception of the Scotts'
Miracle-Gro and the Republic Tool (spreaders) manufacturing operation. The
Company's foreign operations generally do not electronically interface with the
U.S. headquarters.
The headquarters mainframe operations consist primarily of internally developed
systems that have been remediated. Other domestic and international operations
utilize commercial packaged software which, if not Year 2000 compliant, is being
upgraded or replaced. Remediation of headquarters applications, which is the
Company's most complex and costly effort, was completed in April 1999.
24
<PAGE> 25
Personal computers are being made Year 2000 compliant by systematic upgrade
through lease renewals. Many other hardware/software upgrades are being executed
under ongoing maintenance and support agreements with vendors. Testing of
upgrades is being performed internally.
In support of the Company's long-range strategic plans, an enterprise-wide
application systems (ERP) project is under way to link all business groups. This
enterprise-wide system will be implemented in stages starting in 1999 and is
expected to be completed in 2000. The primary software provider for the
enterprise-wide system has represented that its software is Year 2000 compliant.
This is being verified as part of testing prior to implementation.
The Company's Year 2000 compliance efforts are being concentrated on the
currently existing systems to ensure there is adequate information systems
support until implementation of the enterprise-wide system is completed.
NON-IT SYSTEMS
Non-IT systems, comprised mainly of equipment and machinery operating and
control systems, telecommunication systems, building air management systems,
security and fire control systems, electrical and natural gas systems are being
assessed by each business group with advice from the suppliers of these
systems/services. Upgrades or replacements are being made as necessary.
THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS
The Company relies on third party suppliers for finished goods, raw materials,
water, other utilities, transportation and a variety of other key services.
Interruption of supplier operation due to Year 2000 issues could affect Company
operations. The Company continues to evaluate the status of suppliers' efforts
through confirmation and follow-up procedures, including selected site
assessment trips, to determine contingency planning where necessary.
STATE OF READINESS
Each business group has completed an internal inventory to identify IT and
non-IT systems that are susceptible to system failure or processing errors as a
result of Year 2000 issues.
The headquarters mainframe remediation project is complete (including testing).
The upgrade or replacement and testing of IT systems at other North American
operations is substantially complete. Non-IT efforts are being performed
concurrently and replacement and testing is substantially complete. Site visits
continue to be conducted by the Program Office to verify progress against plans.
Year 2000 readiness plans are being executed within the International segment.
Upgrades of packaged software for the primary systems are substantially
complete. Site visits are being conducted by the Program Office to verify
progress against plans.
A confirmation process with respect to third party suppliers continues. Site
visits with critical suppliers continue, in order to determine if alternative
sources are needed.
COSTS
The Company has been tracking incremental Year 2000 costs which exclude the
costs of internally dedicated resources. Contingency planning costs are not yet
quantified. The current estimate of incremental costs for the Year 2000 efforts
(excluding those related to the ERP project) is approximately $5.7 million. Of
this amount, $4.3 million has been incurred to date. These costs, with the
exception of relatively small capital expenditures, are being expensed as
incurred and are being funded through operating cash flows. A summary of the
cost components follows ($ in millions):
25
<PAGE> 26
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of Remainder
July 3, 1999 of 1999 Total
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Location:
Headquarters mainframe $3.0 $0.0 $3.0
Other U.S. Operations 0.5 0.8 1.3
International Operations 0.8 0.6 1.4
---- ---- ----
Total $4.3 $1.4 $5.7
---- ---- ----
</TABLE>
RISKS
The principal business risks to the Company relating to completion of Year 2000
efforts are:
o Reliance on key business partners to not have disruption in their ability
to provide goods and services as a result of Year 2000 issues.
o The ability to recruit and/or retain key staff for the Year 2000 effort.
o Unforeseen issues arising in connection with recent and future
acquisitions/business partnerships.
o Forecasting unreliability due to customers' departures from expected
buying patterns.
o The ability to continue to focus on Year 2000 issues by internal and
external resources.
Because the Company's Year 2000 readiness is dependent upon key business
partners also being Year 2000 ready, there can be no guarantee that the
Company's efforts will prevent a material adverse impact on its results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. The possible consequences to the
Company of its key business partners' inability to provide goods and services as
a result of Year 2000 issues include temporary plant closings; delays in
delivery of finished products; delays in receipt of key raw materials,
containers and packaging supplies; invoice and collection errors; and inventory
and supply obsolescence. The Company believes that its readiness efforts, which
include confirmation, site visits and other testing with critical suppliers to
determine if contingency planning is needed, should reduce the likelihood of
such disruptions.
CONTINGENCY PLANS
A formal contingency plan process is underway, now that a significant amount of
the business units' readiness plans have been completed. The Company will
continue to assess where alternative courses of action are needed as the IT and
non-IT readiness plans are executed. Due to the nature of contingency planning,
assessment and planning efforts will continue until the end of 1999.
ONGOING PROCESS
The Company's readiness program is an ongoing process and the estimates of costs
and completion dates for various components of the program described above are
subject to change.
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING ("ERP")
In July 1998, the Company announced a project designed to bring its information
system resources in line with the Company's current strategic objectives. The
project will include the redesign of certain key business processes in
26
<PAGE> 27
connection with the installation of new software on a world-wide basis over the
course of the next two fiscal years. The Company estimates that the project will
cost $50.0 million, approximately 75% of which will be capitalized over a period
of four to eight years. SAP has been selected as the primary software provider
for this project.
The Company has expensed approximately $6.1 million related to the project since
its inception.
EURO
In January 1999, a new currency called the "euro" began to be introduced in
certain Economic and Monetary Union ("EMU") countries. During 2002, all EMU
countries are expected to be operating with the euro as their single currency.
Uncertainty exists as to the effects the euro currency will have on the
marketplace. Additionally, the European Commission has not yet defined and
formalized all of the final rules and regulations. The Company is still
assessing the impact the EMU formation and euro implementation will have on its
internal systems and the sale of its products. The Company expects to take
appropriate actions based on the results of such assessment. The Company has not
yet determined the costs related to addressing this issue and there can be no
assurance that this issue and its related costs will not have a materially
adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial
condition.
MANAGEMENT'S OUTLOOK
Results for the nine months of fiscal 1999 are in line with the Company's
long-term strategy for profitable growth. The performance in 1999 reflects the
successful continuation of its primary growth drivers: to emphasize
consumer-oriented marketing efforts to pull demand through its distribution
channels, and to make strategic acquisitions to increase market share in global
markets and within segments of the lawn and garden category. Restructuring
charges taken in fiscal 1998 reflect the costs to integrate recent acquisitions
and to exit businesses that are not strategically aligned with the Company's
core businesses. Going forward, these actions should allow the Company to fully
realize the operational synergies created by the acquisitions and to focus
resources in businesses that provide opportunities for growth.
Looking forward, the Company maintains the following broad tenets to its
strategic plan:
(1) Promote and capitalize on the strengths of the Scotts(R),
Miracle-Gro(R) and Hyponex(R) industry-leading brands, as well as
those brands acquired in conjunction with the RPJ and Ortho
transactions. This involves a commitment to investors and retail
partners that the Company will support these brands through
advertising and promotion unequaled in the lawn and garden
consumables market. In the Professional categories, it signifies a
commitment to customers to provide value as an integral element in
their long-term success;
(2) Commit to continuously study and improve knowledge of the market,
the consumer and the competition;
(3) Simplify product lines and business processes, to focus on those
that deliver value, evaluate marginal ones and eliminate those
that lack future prospects; and
(4) Achieve world leadership in operations, leveraging technology and
know-how to deliver outstanding customer service and quality.
27
<PAGE> 28
Within the Company's four-year strategic plan, management has established
challenging, but realistic, financial goals, including:
(1) Sales growth of 8% to 10%;
(2) Continued operating margin improvement;
(3) Minimum compounded annual EPS growth of 15%.
(4) Return on equity target of at least 15%
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company has made and will make certain forward-looking statements in its
Annual Report, Form 10-K and in other contexts relating to future growth and
profitability targets, and strategies designed to increase total shareholder
value. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") provides
a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide
prospective information, so long as those statements are identified as
forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements
identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.
The Company desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the
Act.
These forward-looking statements represent challenging goals for the Company,
and the achievement thereof is subject to a variety of risks and assumptions,
and numerous factors beyond the Company's control. These forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, information regarding the future
economic performance and financial condition of the Company, the plans and
objectives of the Company's management, and the Company's assumptions regarding
such performance and plans. Therefore, it is possible that the Company's future
actual financial results may differ materially from those expressed in these
forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
- - Effect of Weather Conditions -- Adverse weather conditions could
adversely impact financial results: Weather conditions in North America
and Europe have a significant impact on the timing of sales in the spring
selling season and overall annual sales. In particular, an abnormally
cold spring throughout the United States could adversely affect the
Company's financial results;
- - Effect of Seasonality -- Historical seasonality could impair the
Company's ability to make interest payments on indebtedness. Because the
Company's products are used primarily in the spring and summer, the
business is highly seasonal. Approximately 72% of sales occur in the
second and third fiscal quarters. Working capital needs, and
correspondingly borrowings, peak at the end of the first fiscal quarter
during which the Company generates less revenues while incurring
expenditures in preparation for the spring selling season. If the Company
is unable to draw on the new credit facility when an interest payment is
due on the other indebtedness, this seasonality could adversely affect
the Company's ability to make interest payments as required by the other
indebtedness. Adverse weather conditions could heighten this risk;
- - Continued Marketplace Acceptance of the Company's North American Consumer
Groups' "Pull" Advertising Marketing Strategies - Acceptance is
particularly important in the Consumer Lawns group which refocused its
general marketing strategy beginning in fiscal 1996;
- - The Ability To Maintain Profit Margins On Its Products, To Produce Its
Products On A Timely Basis, And To Maintain And Develop Additional
Production Capacity As Necessary To Meet Demand;
- - Competition Among Lawn And Garden Care Product Producers Supplying The
Consumer And Professional Markets, Both In North America And Europe;
- - Competition Between And The Recent Consolidation Within The Retail
Outlets Selling Lawn And Garden Care Products Produced By The Company;
- - Public Perceptions Regarding The Safety Of The Products Produced And
Marketed By The Company;
28
<PAGE> 29
- - Risks Associated With International Operations -- The Company's
significant international operations make it more susceptible to
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and to the costs of international
regulation. The Company currently operates manufacturing, sales and
service facilities outside of North America and particularly in the U.K.,
Germany and France. International operations have increased with the
acquisitions of Levington, Miracle Garden Care and RPJ and will increase
further through the Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement and the Ortho
acquisition. In fiscal 1998, international sales accounted for
approximately 18% of total sales. Therefore, the Company is subject to
risks associated with operations in foreign countries, including
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the imposition of limitations on
conversion of foreign currencies into dollars or remittance of dividends
and other payments by foreign subsidiaries. Many foreign countries have
tended to suffer from inflation more than the United States. In addition,
by operating in a large number of countries, the Company incurs
additional costs of compliance with local regulations. The Company has
attempted to hedge some currency exchange rate risks, including by
borrowing in local currencies, but such hedges do not eliminate the risk
completely. The costs related to international operations could adversely
affect operations and financial results in the future;
- - Effect Of New European Currency -- The implementation of the euro
currency in certain European countries in 2002 could adversely impact the
Company. In January 1999, a new currency called the "euro" began to be
introduced in certain Economic and Monetary Union ("EMU") countries.
During 2002, all EMU countries are expected to be operating with the euro
as their single currency. Uncertainty exists as to the effects the euro
currency will have on the marketplace. Additionally, all of the final
rules and regulations have not yet been defined and finalized by the
European Commission with regard to the euro currency. The Company is
still assessing the impact the EMU formation will have on internal
systems and the sale of products. The Company expects to take appropriate
actions based on the results of such assessment. However, the Company has
not yet determined the cost related to addressing this issue and there
can be no assurance that this issue and its related costs will not have a
materially adverse effect on operating results and financial condition;
- - Changes In Economic Conditions In The United States And The Impact Of
Changes In Interest Rates;
- - Addressing Year 2000 Issues -- The failure of the Company, or the failure
of third party suppliers or retailer customers, to address information
technology issues related to the Year 2000 could adversely affect
operations. Like other business entities, the Company must address the
ability of its computer software applications and other business systems
(e.g., embedded microchips) to properly identify the year 2000 due to a
commonly used programming convention of using only two digits to identify
a year. Unless modified or replaced, these systems could fail or create
erroneous results when referencing the year 2000. While the Company is
assessing the relevant issues related to the Year 2000 problem and has
implemented a readiness program to mitigate the possibility of business
interruption or other risks, the Company cannot be sure that it will have
adequately addressed the issue, particularly with respect to recent and
pending acquisitions. Moreover, the Company relies on third party
suppliers for finished goods, raw materials, water, other utilities,
transportation and a variety of other key services. If one or more of
these suppliers fail to address the Year 2000 problem adequately, such
suppliers' operations could be interrupted. Such interruption, in turn,
could adversely affect the Company's operations. In addition, the failure
of retailer customers adequately to address the Year 2000 problem could
adversely affect financial results;
- - The Ability To Improve Processes And Business Practices To Keep Pace With
The Economic, Competitive And Technological Environment, Including
Successful Completion Of The Enterprise Resource Planning Project;
- - Environmental Regulation -- Compliance with environmental and other
public health regulations could result in the expenditure of significant
capital resources. Local, state, federal and foreign laws and regulations
relating to environmental matters affect the Company in several ways. All
products containing pesticides must be registered with the United States
Environmental Protection Agency ("United States EPA") (and in many cases,
similar state and/or foreign agencies) before they can be sold. The
inability to obtain or the cancellation of any such registration could
have an adverse effect on the Company. The severity of the effect would
depend on which products were involved, whether another product could be
substituted and whether
29
<PAGE> 30
competitors were similarly affected. The Company attempts to anticipate
regulatory developments and maintain registrations of, and access to,
substitute chemicals, but may not always be able to avoid or minimize
these risks. Regulations regarding the use of certain pesticide and
fertilizer products may include requirements that only certified or
professional users apply the product or that certain products be used
only on certain types of locations (such as "not for use on sod farms or
golf courses"), may require users to post notices on properties to which
products have been or will be applied, may require notification of
individuals in the vicinity that products will be applied in the future
or may ban the use of certain ingredients. In addition, with the
acquisitions of RPJ and Ortho, the Company has acquired many new
pesticide product lines that are subject to additional regulations. Even
if the Company is able to comply with all such regulations and obtain all
necessary registrations, the Company cannot assure that its products,
particularly pesticide products, will not cause injury to the environment
or to people under all circumstances. The costs of compliance,
remediation or products liability have adversely affected operating
results in the past and could materially affect future quarterly or
annual operating results;
- - Control By Significant Shareholders -- The interests of the Miracle-Gro
Shareholders could conflict with those of the other shareholders or
noteholders. The Miracle-Gro Shareholders (through the Hagedorn
Partnership, L.P.) beneficially own approximately 42% of the outstanding
common shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis. While the merger
agreement pursuant to which Scotts and Miracle-Gro merged places certain
voting restrictions on the Miracle-Gro Shareholders through May 19, 2000,
the Miracle-Gro Shareholders have the right to designate three members of
the Company's Board of Directors and have the ability to veto significant
corporate actions by the Company. In addition, after May 19, 2000, the
Miracle-Gro Shareholders will be able to vote their shares without
restriction and will be able to significantly control the election of
directors and the approval of other actions requiring the approval of the
Company's shareholders. The interests of the Miracle-Gro Shareholders
could conflict with those of the Company's other shareholders or the
holders of the Company issued notes;
- - Substantial Leverage -- The Company's substantial indebtedness could
adversely affect the financial health of the Company and prevent the
Company from fulfilling its obligations under certain indebtedness. As a
result of the Notes offering, the Company has a significant amount of
indebtedness. This substantial indebtedness could have important
consequences. For example, it could:
- make it more difficult to satisfy obligations with respect to
indebtedness;
- increase vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry
conditions;
- limit the ability to fund future working capital, capital
expenditures, research and development costs and other general
corporate requirements;
- require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow
from operations to payments on indebtedness, thereby reducing the
availability of cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, research and development efforts and other general
corporate purposes;
- limit flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the
Company's business and the industry in which it operates;
- place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to
competitors that have less debt; and
- limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in
the Company's indebtedness, among other things, the ability to
borrow additional funds. And, failing to comply with those
covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured
or waived, could have a material adverse effect on the Company;
- - Additional Borrowings Available -- Despite current indebtedness levels,
the Company and its subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more
debt. This could further exacerbate the risks described above. The terms
of the indenture do not fully prohibit the Company or its subsidiaries
from doing so. If new debt is added to the Company and its subsidiaries'
current debt levels, the related risks that the Company now face could
intensify;
30
<PAGE> 31
- - Ability To Service Debt -- To service indebtedness, the Company will
require a significant amount of cash. The Company's ability to generate
cash depends on many factors beyond its control. The ability to make
payments on and to refinance indebtedness, and to fund planned capital
expenditures and research and development efforts will depend on the
ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is
subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative,
regulatory and other factors that are beyond the Company's control. Based
on current level of operations and anticipated cost savings and operating
improvements, the Company believes its cash flow from operations,
available cash and available borrowings under the new credit facility
will be adequate to meet its future liquidity needs for at least the next
few years. The Company cannot assure, however, that its business will
generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that currently anticipated
cost savings and operating improvements will be realized on schedule or
at all or that future borrowings will be available under the new credit
facility in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, or
to fund other liquidity needs. The Company may need to refinance all or a
portion of its indebtedness, on or before maturity. The Company cannot
ensure that it will be able to refinance any of its indebtedness, on
commercially reasonable terms or at all;
- - Integration Issues -- Inability to integrate the acquisitions made could
prevent the Company from maximizing synergies and could adversely affect
financial results. The Company has made several substantial acquisitions
in the past four years. The Ortho acquisition represents the largest. The
success of any completed acquisition depends, and the success of the
Ortho acquisition will depend, on the ability to integrate effectively
the acquired business. The Company believes that the RPJ acquisition and
the Ortho acquisition provide significant cost saving opportunities.
However, if the Company is not able to successfully integrate Ortho, RPJ
or other acquisitions, the Company will not be able to maximize such cost
saving opportunities. Rather, the failure to integrate such acquired
businesses, because of difficulties in the assimilation of operations and
products, the diversion of management's attention from other business
concerns, the loss of key employees or other factors, could materially
adversely affect financial results;
- - Customer Concentration -- Because of the concentration of sales to a
small number of retail customers, the loss of one of the top 10 customers
could adversely affect financial results. The Company's top 10 customers
together accounted for approximately 50% of 1998 fiscal year sales and
27% of outstanding accounts receivable as of September 30, 1998. The top
two customers, The Home Depot and Wal*Mart, represented approximately 17%
and 10%, respectively, of our 1998 fiscal year sales and approximately
12% and 2%, respectively, of outstanding accounts receivable at September
30, 1998. The loss of, or reduction in orders from, The Home Depot,
Wal*Mart or any other significant customer could have a material adverse
effect on the Company and its financial results, as could customer
disputes regarding shipments, fees, merchandise condition or related
matters with, or the inability to collect accounts receivable from, any
of such customers;
- - Termination of Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement -- If Monsanto terminates
the Roundup(R) marketing agreement without having to pay a termination
fee, the Company would lose a substantial source of future earnings.
Monsanto has the right to terminate the Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement
either as a whole or within a particular region for certain events of
default. If Monsanto rightfully terminates the Company pursuant to an
event of default, the Company would not be entitled to any termination
fee under the Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement and would lose the
significant source of earnings that the Company believes the Roundup(R)
Marketing Agreement provides. In addition, Monsanto may terminate the
Company within a given region, including North America, without paying a
termination fee, if sales decline on a consumer sell-through basis over a
cumulative three program year period or if such sales decline by more
than 5% for each of two consecutive program years, unless the Company can
show, in effect, that such declines were not its fault;
- - Post-Patent Results of Roundup(R) in the United States -- The Company
cannot predict the success of Roundup(R) after glyphosate ceases to be
patented. Substantial new competition in the United States could
adversely affect the Company. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in
Roundup(R), is subject to a patent in the United States that expires in
September 2000. Glyphosate is no longer subject to patent in the European
Union and is not subject to patent in Canada. While sales of Roundup(R)
in such countries have continued to increase despite the lack of a
patent, sales in the United States may decline as a result of increased
competition after the U.S. patent expires. Any such decline in sales
would adversely affect the Company's net commission
31
<PAGE> 32
under the Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement and therefore financial results.
Such a decline could also trigger Monsanto's regional termination right
under the Roundup(R) Marketing Agreement.
- - Federal Government Review of the Non-Selective Herbicide Market under the
Antitrust Laws Could Adversely Affect Financial Results.
The Company understands that the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") is
reviewing the non-selective herbicide market under the various antitrust
laws of the United States. Pursuant to this review, the FTC has requested
additional information from the Company regarding Roundup(R) and
Finale(R), a brand of non-selective herbicide that was bought from AgrEvo
Environmental Health, Inc. in May 1998, and information from Monsanto
regarding Roundup(R). The Company has subsequently divested the Finale(R)
business. Any modification of the Roundup Marketing Agreement, as a
result of the FTC's review, could adversely affect financial results.
32
<PAGE> 33
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As part of its ongoing business, the Company is exposed to certain market risks,
including fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates,
commodity prices, and its common share price. The Company uses derivative
financial and other instruments, where appropriate, to manage these risks. The
Company does not enter into transactions designed to mitigate its market risks
for trading or speculative purposes.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company has various debt instruments outstanding at July 3, 1999 that are
impacted by changes in interest rates. As a means of managing its interest rate
risk on these debt instruments, the Company has entered into interest rate swap
agreements to effectively convert certain variable rate debt obligations to
fixed rates as follows:
A 20 million British Pound Sterling notional amount swap used to convert
obligations denominated in British Pounds Sterling to a fixed rate. The
exchange rate used to convert British Pounds Sterling to U.S. dollars at
July 3, 1999 was $1.58:1 GBP.
Four interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $105.0 million
which are used to hedge certain variable-rate obligations under the
Company's credit facility. The credit facility requires that the Company
enter into hedge agreements to the extent necessary to provide that at
least 50% of the aggregate principal amount of the senior subordinated
notes and term loan facilities is subject to a fixed interest rate.
The following table summarizes information about the Company's derivative
financial instruments and its debt instruments that are sensitive to changes in
interest rates as of July 3, 1999. For debt instruments, the table presents
principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected
maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents expected cash flows
based on notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by contractual
maturity dates. Weighted-average variable rates are based on implied forward
rates in the yield curve at July 3, 1999. The information is presented in U.S.
dollars (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXPECTED MATURITY DATE
FAIR
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 THEREAFTER TOTAL VALUE
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
LONG-TERM DEBT:
Fixed rate debt $(332.9) $(332.9) $(328.1)
Average rate 8.625% 8.625%
Variable rate debt $(1.5) $(25.0) $(32.0) $(42.6) $(46.5) $(369.8) $(517.4) $(517.4)
Average rate 7.29% 6.85% 6.82% 6.79% 6.79% 7.88% 7.57%
INTEREST-RATE
DERIVATIVES:
Interest rate swap $(0.2) $(0.6) $(0.3) $(0.2) $ (1.3)
Average rate 7.62% 7.62% 7.62% 7.62%
Interest rate swap $ 0.0 $ 0.3 $ 0.5 $ 0.2 $ 0.8
Average rate 5.05% 5.05% 5.05% 5.05%
Interest rate swap $ 0.0 $ 0.2 $ 0.3 $ 0.2 $ 0.7
Average rate 5.08% 5.08% 5.08% 5.08%
Interest rate swap $ 0.0 $ 0.1 $ 0.3 $ 0.3 $ 0.1 $ 0.7
Average rate 5.11% 5.11% 5.11% 5.11% 5.11%
Interest rate swap $ 0.0 $ 0.2 $ 0.3 $ 0.3 $ 0.3 $ 0.2 $ 1.0
Average rate 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18%
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 34
On January 21, 1999, Scotts issued $330 million of Senior Subordinated
Notes due in 2009 bearing interest at 8.625%, retired approximately 97% of its
$100.0 million Senior Subordinated Notes then outstanding and unwound its then
outstanding interest rate locks. See additional discussion of the Company's
indebtedness in "Liquidity and Capital Resources" in "ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS".
34
<PAGE> 35
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Footnote 9 to the Condensed, Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
See Exhibit Index at page 37 for a list of the exhibits included
herewith.
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fiscal quarter ended
July 3, 1999
35
<PAGE> 36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE SCOTTS COMPANY
Date: August 17, 1999 /s/ CHRISTOPHER L. NAGEL
Christopher L. Nagel
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Vice President and Corporate Controller
36
<PAGE> 37
THE SCOTTS COMPANY QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
JULY 3, 1999
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER
- -------------- ----------- -----------
27 Financial Data Schedule *
*Filed herewith
37
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THE
SCOTTS COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 3, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START> APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END> JUL-03-1999
<CASH> 34,200,000
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 334,700,000
<ALLOWANCES> (15,500,000)
<INVENTORY> 281,100,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 692,800,000
<PP&E> 408,600,000
<DEPRECIATION> (167,300,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,769,500,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 391,000,000
<BONDS> 0
0
176,700,000
<COMMON> 200,000
<OTHER-SE> 289,000,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,769,500,000
<SALES> 586,200,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 596,100,000
<CGS> 349,800,000
<TOTAL-COSTS> 501,300,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (300,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 800,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 24,600,000
<INCOME-PRETAX> 70,500,000
<INCOME-TAX> 28,900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 41,600,000
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 41,600,000
<EPS-BASIC> 2.14
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.35
</TABLE>
