<PAGE>
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
---------------------- --------------------
Commission File number 0-23986
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
(Exact name of registrant
as specified in its Certificate of Limited Partnership)
TEXAS 76-0400061
(State of Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77060
(281) 874-2700
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was
required), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes X No
----- -----
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ X ]
Registrant does not have an aggregate market value for its Limited Partnership
Interests.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Document Incorporated as to
Registration Statement No. 33-37983 Items 1 and 13
on Form S-1
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Form 10-K Annual Report
For the Period Ended December 31, 1999
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM NO. PART I PAGE
- -------- ------ ----
<S> <C> <C>
1 Business I-1
2 Properties I-5
3 Legal Proceedings I-7
4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders I-7
PART II
-------
5 Market Price of and Distributions on the
Registrant's SDIs and Related Interest
Holder Matters II-1
6 Selected Financial Data II-2
7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations II-2
8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data II-4
9 Disagreements on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure II-4
PART III
--------
10 Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant III-1
11 Executive Compensation III-2
12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management III-2
13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions III-2
PART IV
-------
14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
and Reports on Form 8-K IV-1
OTHER
-----
Signatures
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
PART I
Item 1. Business
General Description of Partnership
Swift Energy Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd., a Texas limited
partnership (the "Partnership" or the "Registrant"), is a partnership formed
under a public serial limited partnership offering denominated Swift Depositary
Interests I (Registration Statement No. 33-37983 on Form S-1, originally
declared effective March 19, 1991, and amended effective May 1, 1992, April 1,
1993, April 19, 1994 and May 9, 1995 [the "Registration Statement"]). The
Partnership was formed effective June 30, 1993 under a Limited Partnership
Agreement dated June 30, 1993. The initial 606 investors made capital
contributions of $9,627,683. Investors in the Partnership hold Swift Depositary
Interests ("SDIs") representing beneficial ownership interests in the
Partnership.
The Partnership is principally engaged in the business of acquiring,
developing and, when appropriate, disposing of working interests in proven oil
and gas properties within the continental United States. The Partnership does
not engage in exploratory drilling. Each working interest held by the
Partnership entitles the Partnership to receive, in kind or in value, a share of
the production of oil and gas from the producing property, and obligates the
Partnership to participate in the operation of the property and to bear its
proportionate share of all operating costs associated therewith. The Partnership
typically holds less than the entire working interest in its producing
properties.
At December 31, 1999, the Partnership had expended or committed to
expend 100% of the Interest Holders' commitments in the acquisition and
development of producing properties, which properties are described under Item
2, "Properties," below. The Partnership's revenues and profits are derived
almost entirely from the sale of oil and gas produced from its properties and
from the sale of acquired oil and gas properties, when the sale of such
properties is economically preferable to continued operation.
The Partnership's business and affairs are conducted by its Managing
General Partner, Swift Energy Company, a Texas corporation ("Swift"). The
Partnership's Special General Partner, VJM Corporation, a California corporation
("VJM"), consults with and advises Swift as to certain financial matters. Swift
is the designated operator of many of the properties in which the Partnership
owns interests. The remaining properties are operated by industry operators
designated by the owners of a majority of the working interest in each property.
The general manner in which the Partnership acquires producing
properties and otherwise conducts its business is described in detail in the
Registration Statement under "Proposed Activities of the Partnerships," which is
incorporated herein by reference. The following is intended only as a summary of
the Partnership's manner of doing business and specific activities to date.
Liquidation
During the first quarter of 2000, the Managing General Partner mailed
proxy material to the Interest Holders proposing to sell all the Partnership's
interests in oil and gas properties and dissolve and liquidate the Partnership.
In March 2000, the Interest Holders of the Partnership approved the proposal to
liquidate the Partnership. The Managing General Partner anticipates liquidation
will be substantially completed within the next two years.
Manner of Acquiring Properties; Net Profits and Overriding Royalty Interest
Agreement
For the sake of legal and administrative convenience, the producing
properties owned by the Registrant have typically been acquired initially by
Swift, which then conveyed ownership of each such property to the Registrant.
The Registrant acquires producing properties from Swift at the property
acquisition cost of such properties to Swift, as adjusted for intervening
operations.
The Registrant entered into a Net Profits and Overriding Royalty
Interest Agreement dated June 30, 1993 (the "NP/OR Agreement") with Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-B, Ltd. (the "Pension Partnership"). The Pension
Partnership is a Texas limited partnership that is also managed by Swift and
VJM. The Pension Partnership was formed to acquire nonoperating interests, such
as net profits, royalty and overriding royalty interests, in producing oil and
gas properties.
I-1
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
Under the NP/OR Agreement, the Registrant and the Pension Partnership
have, in effect, combined their funds in acquiring producing properties; using
funds committed to the NP/OR Agreement by both partnerships, the Registrant
acquires producing properties, then promptly conveys nonoperating interests
therein to the Pension Partnership. The Registrant initially committed
$9,627,683 and the Pension Partnership initially committed $6,237,102 for
acquisitions under the NP/OR Agreement. The Registrant is obligated under the
NP/OR Agreement to convey to the Pension Partnership a 39% fixed net profits
interest and a variable overriding royalty interest in specified depths of every
producing property it acquires, except that (i) properties anticipated to
require significant development operations, and (ii) nonoperating interests
offered to the Registrant by third parties may be purchased by the registrant
outside the NP/OR Agreement, without participation by the Pension Partnership.
The Registrant is entitled to withdraw up to 30% of its committed funds under
the NP/OR Agreement for such acquisitions.
All properties acquired by the Registrant since the date of the NP/OR
Agreement have been acquired subject to the NP/OR Agreement and the nonoperating
interests created thereby. At December 31, 1999, the Registrant had not made any
withdrawals to acquire properties anticipated to require significant
development.
In accordance with its obligations under the NP/OR Agreement, as of
December 31, 1999, the Registrant had conveyed to the Pension Partnership a net
profits interest burdening certain depths of all producing properties acquired
by the Registrant since the date of the NP/OR Agreement. Typically, a net
profits interest in an oil and gas property entitles the owner to a specified
percentage share of the gross proceeds generated by the burdened property, net
of operating costs. The 39% net profits interest conveyed to the Pension
Partnership under the NP/OR Agreement differs from the typical net profits
interest in that it is calculated over the entire group of producing properties
acquired under the NP/OR Agreement; i.e., all operating costs attributable to
the burdened depths of such properties are aggregated, and the total is then
subtracted from the total of all gross proceeds attributable to such depths in
order to calculate the net profits to which the Pension Partnership is entitled.
The net profits interest conveyed to the Pension Partnership burdens only those
depths of each subject property which were evaluated to contain proved reserves
at the date of acquisition, to the extent such depths underlie specified surface
acreage.
The Registrant has also conveyed to the Pension Partnership under the
NP/OR Agreement an overriding royalty interest in each property acquired since
the date of the NP/OR Agreement. An overriding royalty interest is a fractional
interest in the gross production (or the gross proceeds therefrom) of oil and
gas from a property, free of any exploration, development, operation or
maintenance expenses. Under the NP/OR Agreement, the overriding royalty interest
burdens the portions of each producing property that were evaluated at the date
of acquisition not to contain proved reserves.
Competition, Markets and Regulations
Competition
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive in all its phases. The
Partnership encounters strong competition from many other oil and gas producers,
many of which possess substantial financial resources, in acquiring economically
desirable Producing Properties.
Markets
The amounts of and price obtainable for oil and gas production from
Partnership Properties will be affected by market factors beyond the control of
the Partnership. Such factors include the extent of domestic production, the
level of imports of foreign oil and gas, the general level of market demand on a
regional, national and worldwide basis, domestic and foreign economic conditions
that determine levels of industrial production, political events in foreign
oil-producing regions, and variations in governmental regulations and tax laws
and the imposition of new governmental requirements upon the oil and gas
industry. There can be no assurance that oil and gas prices will not decrease in
the future, thereby decreasing net Revenues from Partnership Properties.
From time to time, there may exist a surplus of natural gas or oil
supplies, the effect of which may be to reduce the amount of hydrocarbons that
the Partnerships may produce and sell while such oversupply exists. In recent
years, initial steps have been taken to provide additional gas transportation
lines from Canada to the United States. If additional Canadian gas is brought to
the United States market, it could create downward pressure on United States gas
prices.
I-2
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
Regulations
Environmental Regulation
The federal government and various state and local governments have
adopted laws and regulations regarding the control of contamination of the
environment. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a permit
by Operators before drilling commences, prohibit drilling activities on certain
lands lying within wilderness areas or where pollution arises and impose
substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from operations, particularly
operations near or in onshore and offshore waters or on submerged lands. These
laws and regulations may also increase the costs of routine drilling and
operation of wells. Because these laws and regulations change frequently, the
costs to the Partnership of compliance with existing and future environmental
regulations cannot be predicted. However, the Managing Partner does not believe
that the Partnership is affected in a significantly different manner by these
regulations than are its competitors in the oil and gas industry.
Federal Regulation of Natural Gas
The transportation and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce is
heavily regulated by agencies of the federal government. The following
discussion is intended only as a summary of the principal statutes, regulations
and orders that may affect the production and sale of natural gas from
Partnership Properties. This summary should not be relied upon as a complete
review of applicable natural gas regulatory provisions.
FERC Orders
Several major regulatory changes have been implemented by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") from 1985 to the present that affect the
economics of natural gas production, transportation and sales. In addition, the
FERC continues to promulgate revisions to various aspects of the rules and
regulations affecting those segments of the natural gas industry that remain
subject to the FERC's jurisdiction. In April 1992, the FERC issued Order No. 636
pertaining to pipeline restructuring. This rule requires interstate pipelines to
unbundle transportation and sales services by separately stating the price of
each service and by providing customers only the particular service desired,
without regard to the source for purchase of the gas. The rule also requires
pipelines to (i) provide nondiscriminatory "no-notice" service allowing firm
commitment shippers to receive delivery of gas on demand up to certain limits
without penalties, (ii) establish a basis for release and reallocation of firm
upstream pipeline capacity and (iii) provide non-discriminatory access to
capacity by firm transportation shippers on a downstream pipeline. The rule
requires interstate pipelines to use a straight fixed variable rate design. The
rule imposes these same requirements upon storage facilities.
FERC Order No. 500 affects the transportation and marketability of
natural gas. Traditionally, natural gas has been sold by producers to pipeline
companies, which then resold the gas to end-users. FERC Order No. 500 alters
this market structure by requiring interstate pipelines that transport gas for
others to provide transportation service to producers, distributors and all
other shippers of natural gas on a nondiscriminatory, "first-come, first-served"
basis ("open access transportation"), so that producers and other shippers can
sell natural gas directly to end-users. FERC Order No. 500 contains additional
provisions intended to promote greater competition in natural gas markets.
It is not anticipated that the marketability of and price obtainable
for natural gas production from Partnership Properties will be significantly
affected by FERC Order No. 500. Gas produced from Partnership Properties
normally will be sold to intermediaries who have entered into transportation
arrangements with pipeline companies. These intermediaries will accumulate gas
purchased from a number of producers and sell the gas to end-users through open
access pipeline transportation.
State Regulations
Production of any oil and gas from Partnership Properties will be
affected to some degree by state regulations. Many states in which the
Partnership will operate have statutory provisions regulating the production and
sale of oil and gas, including provisions regarding deliverability. Such
statutes, and the regulations promulgated in connection therewith, are generally
intended to prevent waste of oil and gas and to protect correlative rights to
produce oil and gas between owners of a common reservoir. Certain state
regulatory authorities also regulate the amount of oil and gas produced by
assigning allowable rates of production to each well or proration unit.
I-3
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
Federal Leases
Some of the Partnership's properties are located on federal oil and gas
leases administered by various federal agencies, including the Bureau of Land
Management. Various regulations and orders affect the terms of leases,
exploration and development plans, methods of operation and related matters.
Employees
The Partnership has no employees. Swift, however, has a staff of
geologists, geophysicists, petroleum engineers, landmen, and accounting
personnel who administer the operations of Swift and the Partnership. As of
December 31, 1999, Swift had 173 employees. Swift's administrative and overhead
expenses attributable to the Partnership's operations are borne by the
Partnership.
I-4
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
Item 2. Properties
As of December 31, 1999, the Partnership has acquired interests in
producing oil and gas properties which are generally described below.
Principal Oil and Gas Producing Properties
The most valuable fields in the Partnership, based upon year-end
engineering estimates of discounted future net revenues using constant pricing
and costs, are described below.
1. The Second Bayou Field is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana
(American Cometra-So. Louisiana acquisition). This field accounts for 34% of
Partnership value.
2. The Greenbranch Field is in McMullen County, Texas (American Cometra
acquisition). This field produces gas and oil from multiple pay zones and
accounts for 36% of Partnership value.
The remaining value in the Partnership is attributable to numerous
properties none of which equals or exceeds 15 percent of the total Partnership
value.
Title to Properties
Title to substantially all significant producing properties of the
Partnership has been examined. The properties are subject to royalty, overriding
royalty and other interests customary in the industry. The Managing General
Partner does not believe any of these burdens materially detract from the value
of the properties or will materially detract from the value of the properties or
materially interfere with their use in the operation of the business of the
Partnership.
Production and Sales Price
The following table summarizes the sales volumes of the Partnership's
net oil and gas production expressed in MCFs. Equivalent MCFs are obtained by
converting oil to gas on the basis of their relative energy content; one barrel
equals 6,000 cubic feet of gas.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Production
-------------------------------------
For the Years Ended
December 31,
-------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Volumes (Equivalent MCFs) 223,358 320,223 520,150
Average Sales Price
per equivalent MCF $2.57 $1.88 $2.78
Average Production Cost
per Equivalent MCF
(includes production taxes) $1.37 $1.11 $0.90
</TABLE>
I-5
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
Net Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Presented below are the estimates of the Partnership's proved reserves
as of December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997. All of the Partnership's proved reserves
are located in the United States.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------------------- --------------------- -------------------
Natural Natural Natural
Oil Gas Oil Gas Oil Gas
------- -------- ------- -------- ------- -------
(BBLS) (MMCF) (BBLS) (MMCF) (BBLS) (MMCF)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Proved developed
reserves at end of year 213,909 1,100 190,880 1,058 132,858 1,185
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======
Proved reserves
Balance at beginning
of year 253,506 1,642 206,099 1,784 241,754 2,453
Extensions, discoveries
and other additions -- 3 -- -- -- --
Revisions of previous
estimates 61,643 245 78,048 71 17,893 (322)
Sales of minerals in
place (7,763) (83) (7,149) (35) (19,232) (33)
Production (18,625) (112) (23,492) (178) (34,316) (314)
------- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------
Balance at end of year 288,761 1,695 253,506 1,642 206,099 1,784
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =====
</TABLE>
Revisions of previous quantity estimates are related to upward or
downward variations based on current engineering information for production
rates, volumetrics and reservoir pressure. Additionally, changes in quantity
estimates are the result of the increase or decrease in crude oil and natural
gas prices at each year end which have the effect of adding or reducing proved
reserves on marginal properties due to economic limitations.
I-6
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
The following table summarizes by acquisition the Registrant's reserves
and gross and net interests in producing oil and gas wells as of December 31,
1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Reserves
December 31, 1999
---------------------
Natural Wells
Oil Gas -----------------------
Acquisition State(s) (BBLS) (MMCF) Gross Net
- ----------- -------- ------- ----- ----- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
American Cometra AL, CO, LA,
ND, NM, NV,
OK, TX, WY 220,743 517 793 21.125
AMC - So. Louisiana LA 11,769 1,088 49 0.667
Genesis TX 20,822 70 15 0.422
L L & E AL, MS 35,427 20 19 0.233
------- ----- ------ --------
288,761 1,695 876 22.447
======= ===== ===== ========
</TABLE>
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
proved reserves and in projecting the future rates of production, timing and
plan of development. Oil and gas reserve engineering must be recognized as a
subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that
cannot be measured in an exact way, and estimates of other engineers might
differ from those above, audited by H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc., an
independent petroleum consulting firm. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a
function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, testing and production
subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimate,
and, as a general rule, reserve estimates based upon volumetric analysis are
inherently less reliable than those based on lengthy production history.
Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil
and gas that are ultimately recovered.
In estimating the oil and natural gas reserves, the Registrant, in
accordance with criteria prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
has used prices received as of December 31, 1999 without escalation, except in
those instances where fixed and determinable gas price escalations are covered
by contracts, limited to the price the Partnership reasonably expects to
receive. The Registrant does not believe that any favorable or adverse event
causing a significant change in the estimated quantity of proved reserves has
occurred between December 31, 1999 and the date of this report.
Future prices received for the sale of the Partnership's products may
be higher or lower than the prices used in the evaluation described above; the
operating costs relating to such production may also increase or decrease from
existing levels. The estimates presented above are in accordance with rules
adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Partnership is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings
to which it is a party or of which any of its property is the subject.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of Interest Holders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
I-7
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
PART II
Item 5. Market Price of and Distributions on the Registrant's SDIs and Related
Interest Holder Matters
Market Information
SDIs in the Partnership were initially sold at a price of $1 per SDI.
SDIs are not traded on any exchange and there is no established public trading
market for the SDIs. Swift is aware of negotiated transfers of SDIs between
unrelated parties; however, these transfers have been limited and sporadic. Due
to the nature of these transactions, Swift has no verifiable information
regarding prices at which SDIs have been transferred.
Holders
As of December 31, 1999, there were 593 Interest Holders holding SDIs
in the Partnership.
Distributions
The Partnership generally makes distributions to Interest Holders on a
quarterly basis, subject to the restrictions set forth in the Limited
Partnership Agreement. In the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999, the
Partnership distributed a total of $505,400 and $137,200, respectively, to the
holders of its SDIs. Cash distributions constitute net proceeds from sale of oil
and gas production after payment of lease operating expenses and other
partnership expenses. Some or all of such amounts or any proceeds from the sale
of partnership properties could be deemed to constitute a return of investors'
capital.
Oil and gas investments involve a high risk of loss, and no assurance
can be given that any particular level of distributions to holders of SDIs can
be achieved or maintained. Although it is anticipated that quarterly
distributions will continue to be made through 1999, the Partnership's ability
to make distributions could be diminished by any event adversely affecting the
oil and gas properties in which the Partnership owns interests or the amount of
revenues received by the Partnership therefrom.
The Partnership's Limited Partnership Agreement contains various
provisions which might serve to delay, defer or prevent a change in control of
the Partnership, such as the requirement of a vote of Limited Partners in order
to sell all or substantially all of the Partnership's properties or the
requirement of consent by the Managing General Partner to transfers of limited
partnership interests and provisions prohibiting the transfer of Limited
Partnership Units in any fiscal year in excess of a limit which has been
established in order to comply with certain federal income tax regulations.
II-1
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data, prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles for the years ended December 31, 1999,
1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995, should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements included in Item 8:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 576,658 $ 622,726 $ 1,479,833 $ 1,692,957 $ 1,642,764
Income (Loss) $ (20,529) $ (1,139,659) $ (92,788) $ (8,097) $ (156,262)
Total Assets $ 1,996,430 $ 2,232,612 $ 3,999,299 $ 4,965,808 $ 5,819,578
Cash Distributions $ 160,620 $ 552,239 $ 888,105 $ 778,613 $ 945,745
Long Term Obligations $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Interest Holders' Net
Income (Loss) Per SDI $ -- $ (.10) $ -- $ -- $ (.02)
Interest Holders' Cash
Distributions Per SDI $ .01 $ .05 $ .08 $ .07 $ .09
</TABLE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Liquidation
During the first quarter of 2000, the Managing General Partner mailed
proxy material to the Interest Holders proposing to sell all the Partnership's
interests in oil and gas properties and dissolve and liquidate the Partnership.
In March 2000, the Interest Holders of the Partnership approved the proposal to
liquidate the Partnership. The Managing General Partner anticipates liquidation
will be substantially completed within the next two years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Oil and gas reserves are depleting assets and therefore often experience
significant production declines each year from the date of acquisition through
the end of the life of the property. The primary source of liquidity to the
Partnership comes almost entirely from the income generated from the sale of oil
and gas produced from ownership interests in oil and gas properties. This source
of liquidity and the related results of operations, and in turn cash
distributions, will decline in future periods as the oil and gas produced from
these properties also declines while production and general and administrative
costs remain relatively stable making it unlikely that the Partnership will hold
the properties until they are fully depleted, but will likely liquidate when a
substantial majority of the reserves have been produced. Cash distributions to
partners or Interest Holders are determined quarterly, based upon net proceeds
from sale of oil and gas production after payment of lease operating expense,
taxes and development costs, less general and administrative expenses. In
addition, future partnership cash requirements are taken into account to
determine necessary cash reserves.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $141,022, $357,165 and
$793,208 in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by
operating activities in 1999 is related to changes in oil and gas sales
receivable and the Partnership's property sales in 1999. Cash provided by
property sales proceeds totaled $150,723, $8,902 and $177,628 in 1999, 1998 and
1997, respectively. Capital expenditures totaled $40,416, $129,565 and $201,391
in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Cash distributions totaled $160,620,
$552,239 and $888,105 in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. In 1999, cash
distributions were effected by production declines from the Partnership's
property sales in 1999 and low oil and gas prices received during the first part
of this year.
II-2
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
The Partnership has expended all of the partners' net commitments
available for property acquisitions and development by acquiring producing oil
and gas properties. The partnership invests primarily in proved producing
properties with nominal levels of future costs of development for proven but
undeveloped reserves. Significant purchases of additional reserves or extensive
drilling activity are not anticipated. The Partnership does not allow for
additional assessments from the partners or interest holders to fund capital
requirements. However, funds are available from partnership revenues, borrowings
or proceeds from the sale of partnership property. The Partnership plans to
spend in the next two years an estimated $273,000 for capital expenditures
needed for the development and enhancement of proved oil and gas reserves. The
Managing General Partner believes that the funds currently available to the
Partnership will be adequate to meet any anticipated capital requirements.
Results of Operations
Oil and gas sales declined $28,796 or 5 percent in 1999 vs. 1998,
primarily due to decreased oil and gas production. In 1999, production volumes
decreased 30 percent as oil and gas production declined 21 percent and 38
percent, respectively, when compared to 1998. Production declines were related
to normal depletion and the Partnership's property sales. Oil prices increased
67 percent or $6.88/BBL to an average of $17.11/BBL and gas prices increased 13
percent or $0.27/MCF to an average of $2.29/MCF for 1999. Increased oil and gas
prices helped offset the effect of decreased production.
Corresponding production costs per equivalent MCF increased 23 percent
in 1999 compared to 1998, and total production costs decreased 14 percent in
1999, due to production declines.
Total depreciation expense for 1999 decreased 88 percent or $1,118,601
when compared to 1998. In 1998, two components, the normal provision, calculated
on the units of production method, and the additional provision, relating to the
ceiling limitation, make up total depreciation expense. Normal depreciation
expense decreased 55 percent or $182,985 in 1999 compared to 1998, related to
the decline in production volumes.
Oil and gas sales decreased 58 percent in 1998 vs. 1997. A decline in
the 1998 oil prices received of 43 percent or $7.57/BBL had a significant impact
on partnership performance. The average sales price per equivalent MCF decreased
32 percent in 1998 as oil prices decreased 43 percent and gas prices declined 24
percent. Also, production volumes decreased 38 percent due to a 43 percent gas
production decrease and a 32 percent oil production decline. The partnership's
sale in late 1997 of several low value, high operating cost properties
contributed to the 1998 decrease in production volumes.
Production cost per equivalent MCF increased 23 percent in 1998
compared to 1997, primarily due to the decline in production volumes; however,
total production costs decreased 24 percent in 1998.
Associated depreciation expense decreased 46 percent in 1998 when
compared to 1997, also related to the decline in production volumes.
The Partnership recorded an additional provision in depreciation,
depletion and amortization in 1998 and 1997 of $935,616 and $296,726,
respectively, when the present value, discounted at ten percent, of estimated
future net revenues from oil and gas properties, using the guidelines of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, was below the fair market value originally
paid for oil and gas properties, resulting in a full cost ceiling impairment.
During 2000, Partnership revenues and costs are expected to be shared
between the Interest Holders and general partners in a 85:15 ratio. Based on
current oil and gas prices, anticipated levels of oil and gas production and
expected cash distributions during 2000, the Managing General Partner
anticipates that the Partnership sharing ratio will continue to be 85:15.
Year 2000
The Year 2000 issue resulted from computer programs and embedded
computer chips with date fields which could not distinguish between the years
1900 and 2000. The Managing General Partner implemented steps necessary to make
its operations and the related operations of the Partnership capable of
addressing the Year 2000. These steps included upgrading, testing and certifying
its computer systems and field operation services and obtaining Year 2000
compliance certification from all important business suppliers. The Managing
General Partner formed a task force during 1998 to address the Year 2000 issue
and prepare its business systems for the Year 2000. The Managing General Partner
either replaced or updated mission critical systems and completed testing before
2000 began.
II-3
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
The Managing General Partner's business systems are almost entirely
comprised of off-the-shelf software. Most of the necessary changes in computer
instructional code were made by upgrading this software. In addition, the
Managing General Partner received certification as to Year 2000 compliance from
vendors or third party consultants.
The costs incurred to address the Year 2000 issue with respect to the
Managing General Partners' business systems did not have a material effect on
the Partnership's results of operations, or its liquidity and financial
condition. The estimated total cost to the Managing General Partner to address
Year 2000 issues was less than $150,000, most of which was spent during the
testing phase. The Partnership's share of this cost was insignificant.
The most reasonably likely worst case scenario would have been a
prolonged disruption of external power sources upon which core equipment relies,
resulting in a substantial decrease in the Partnership's oil and gas production
activities. In addition, the pipeline operators to whom the Managing General
Partner sells the Partnership's natural gas, as well as other customers and
suppliers, could have been prone to Year 2000 problems that could not be
assessed or detected by the Managing General Partner.
As of the filing of this report, the Managing General Partner is not
aware of any Year 2000 problems either experienced by it or by parties which it
does business, and does not expect to experience such problems in the future.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Part IV, Item 14(a) for index to financial statements.
Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
II-4
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
As a limited partnership, the Registrant has no directors or executive
officers. The business and affairs of the Registrant are managed by Swift as
Managing General Partner. Set forth below is certain information as of March 10,
2000, regarding the directors and executive officers of Swift.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Position(s) with
Name Age Swift and Other Companies
---- --- -------------------------
DIRECTORS
---------
<S> <C> <C>
A. Earl Swift 66 Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
Virgil N. Swift 71 Executive Vice President - Business
Development, Vice Chairman of the Board
G. Robert Evans 68 Director of Swift; Chairman of the Board,
Material Sciences Corporation;
Director, Consolidated Freightways, Inc.,
Fibreboard Corporation, Elco Industries, and
Old Second Bancorp
Raymond O. Loen 75 Director of Swift; President, R. O. Loen
Company
Henry C. Montgomery 64 Director of Swift; Chairman of the Board,
Montgomery Financial Services Corporation;
Director, Southwall Technology Corporation
Clyde W. Smith, Jr. 51 Director of Swift; President, Somerset
Properties, Inc.
Harold J. Withrow 72 Director of Swift
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
------------------
Terry E. Swift 44 President
Joe A. D'Amico 51 Chief Operating Officer
John R. Alden 54 Senior Vice President - Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Bruce H. Vincent 52 Senior Vice President - Funds Management
James M. Kitterman 55 Senior Vice President - Operations
Alton D. Heckaman, Jr. 42 Vice President - Finance and Controller
</TABLE>
III-1
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
From time to time, Swift as Managing General Partner of the Partnership
purchases Units in the Partnership from investors who offer the Units pursuant
to their right of presentment, which purchases are made pursuant to terms set
out in the Partnership's original Limited Partnership Agreement. Due to the
frequency and large number of these transactions, Swift reports these
transactions under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on an
annual rather than a monthly basis. In some cases such annual reporting may
constitute a late filing of the required Section 16 reports under the applicable
Section 16 rules.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
As noted in Item 10, "Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant," above, the Partnership has no executive officers. The executive
officers of Swift and VJM are not compensated by the Partnership.
Certain fees and allowances contemplated by the Limited Partnership
Agreement were paid by the Partnership to Swift and VJM. See Note (4) in Notes
To Financial Statements (Related-Party Transactions) for further discussion.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
No single Interest Holder is known to the Partnership to be the
beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Partnership's SDIs.
Swift and VJM are not aware of any arrangement, the operation of which
may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Partnership.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
As noted in Item 10, "Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant," above, the Partnership has no executive officers or directors, and
thus has not engaged in any transactions in which any such person had an
interest. The Partnership is permitted to engage in certain transactions with
Swift as Managing General Partner and VJM as Special General Partner, subject to
extensive guidelines and restrictions as described in the "Conflicts of
Interest" section of the Prospectus contained in the Registration Statement,
which is incorporated herein by reference.
Summarized below are the principal transactions that have occurred
between the Partnership and Swift, VJM and their affiliates.
1. The oil and gas properties acquired by the Partnership, as described
in Item 2, "Properties" above, were typically acquired initially by Swift from
the seller thereof and subsequently transferred to the Partnership. Such
transfers were made by Swift at its Property Acquisition Costs or Fair Market
Value (as provided in the Limited Partnership Agreement), less any amounts
received from sale of production between the time of acquisition by Swift and
the time of sale to the Partnership.
2. Swift acts as operator for many of the wells in which the
Partnership has acquired interests and during 1993 received compensation for
such activities in accordance with standard industry operating agreements.
3. The Partnership paid to Swift and VJM certain fees as contemplated
by the Limited Partnership Agreement. See Note (4) in Notes To Financial
Statements (Related-Party Transactions) for further discussion.
III-2
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
a(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE NO.
-------------------- --------
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants IV-2
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 IV-3
Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 IV-4
Statements of Partners' Capital for years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 IV-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 IV-6
Notes to Financial Statements IV-7
</TABLE>
a(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All schedules required by the SEC are either inapplicable or the
required information is included in the Financial Statements, the
Notes thereto, or in other information included elsewhere in this
report.
a(3) EXHIBITS
3.1 Limited Partnership Agreement of Swift Energy Operating
Partners 1993-B, Ltd., dated June 30, 1993. (Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1993, Exhibit 3.1).
3.2 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd., as filed June 30, 1993,
with the Texas Secretary of State. (Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993, Exhibit 3.2).
10.1 Net Profits and Overriding Royalty Interest Agreement
between Swift Energy Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd. and
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1993-B, Ltd. dated June 30,
1993. (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993,
Exhibit 10.1).
99.1 A copy of the following section of the Prospectus dated
April 1, 1993, contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 4
to Registration Statement No. 33-37983 on Form S-1 for
Swift Energy Depositary Interests I, as filed on April 1,
1993, which have been incorporated herein by reference:
"Proposed Activities" (pp 25 - 35) and "Conflicts of
Interests" (pp 92 - 96). (Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1993, Exhibit 99.1).
b(1) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the quarter ended
December 31, 1999.
Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section
15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to
Section 12 of the Act.
No annual report to security holders covering the Partnership's 1999
fiscal year has been sent to Interest Holders of the Partnership.
IV-1
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Swift Energy Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd., (a Texas limited partnership) as of December
31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Managing General Partner's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd., as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31,
1999, 1998 and 1997, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Houston, Texas
February 9, 2000
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
--------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 107,842 $ 17,133
Oil and gas sales receivable 111,964 176,972
--------------- --------------
Total Current Assets 219,806 194,105
--------------- --------------
Gas Imbalance Receivable 24,664 25,164
--------------- --------------
Oil and Gas Properties, using full cost
accounting 9,319,85 9,430,159
Less-Accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization (7,567,892) (7,416,816)
--------------- --------------
1,751,960 2,013,343
--------------- --------------
$ 1,996,430 $ 2,232,612
=============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable $ 44,304 $ 99,337
--------------- --------------
Deferred Revenues 20,404 20,404
Interest Holders' Capital
(9,627,683 Interest Holders'SDIs;$1.00 per SDI) 1,931,669 2,112,844
General Partners' Capital 53 27
--------------- --------------
Total Partners' Capital 1,931,722 2,112,871
--------------- --------------
$ 1,996,430 $ 2,232,612
=============== ==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-3
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Oil and gas sales $ 574,173 $ 602,969 $ 1,447,550
Interest income 2,485 7,995 14,390
Other -- 11,762 17,893
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
576,658 622,726 1,479,833
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Lease operating 276,911 322,448 383,643
Production taxes 28,092 33,348 83,059
Depreciation, depletion
and amortization -
Normal 151,076 334,061 617,159
Additional -- 935,616 296,726
General and administrative 141,108 136,912 192,034
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
597,187 1,762,385 1,572,621
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (20,529) $ (1,139,659) $ (92,788)
================ ================ ================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-4
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Interest General Combining
Holders Partners Adjustment Total
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C
Balance,
December 31, 1996 $ 4,189,692 $ 43,426 $ 552,544 $ 4,785,662
Income (Loss) (47,874) 119,383 (164,297) (92,788)
Cash Distributions (743,800) (144,305) -- (888,105)
-------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Balance,
December 31, 1997 3,398,018 18,504 388,247 3,804,769
-------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Income (Loss) (978,511) 28,362 (189,510) (1,139,659)
Cash Distributions (505,400) (46,839) -- (552,239)
-------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Balance,
December 31, 1998 1,914,107 27 198,737 2,112,871
-------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Income (Loss) (38,651) 23,446 (5,324) (20,529)
Cash Distributions (137,200) (23,420) -- (160,620)
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balance,
December 31, 1999 $ 1,738,256 $ 53 $ 193,413 $ 1,931,722
============== ============== ============== ==============
Interest Holders' net income (loss)
per SDI
1997 $ --
==============
1998 $ (0.10)
==============
1999 $ --
==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-5
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Income (loss) $ (20,529) $ (1,139,659) $ (92,788)
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to
net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 151,076 1,269,677 913,885
Change in gas imbalance receivable
and deferred revenues 500 55 868
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in oil and gas sales receivable 65,008 301,881 (43,141)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (55,033) (74,789) 14,384
------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 141,022 357,165 793,208
------------- ------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to oil and gas properties (40,416) (129,565) (201,391)
Proceeds from sales of oil and gas properties 150,723 8,902 177,628
------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 110,307 (120,663) (23,763)
------------- ------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash distributions to partners (160,620) (552,239) (888,105)
------------- ------------- --------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 90,709 (315,737) (118,660)
------------- ------------- --------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 17,133 332,870 451,530
------------- ------------- --------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 107,842 $ 17,133 $ 332,870
============= ============= ==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-6
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Organization and Terms of Partnership Agreement -
Swift Energy Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd., a Texas limited
partnership ("the Partnership"), was formed on June 30, 1993, for the purpose of
purchasing and operating producing oil and gas properties within the continental
United States and Canada. Swift Energy Company ("Swift"), a Texas corporation,
and VJM Corporation ("VJM"), a California corporation, serve as Managing General
Partner and Special General Partner of the Partnership, respectively. The sole
limited partner of the Partnership is Swift Depositary Company, which has
assigned all of its beneficial (but not of record) rights and interests as
limited partner to the investors in the Partnership ("Interest Holders"), in the
form of Swift Depositary Interests ("SDIs").
The Managing General Partner has paid or will pay out of its own
corporate funds (as a capital contribution to the Partnership) $1,251,599, which
includes all selling commissions, offering expenses, printing, legal and
accounting fees and other formation costs incurred in connection with the
offering of SDIs and the formation of the Partnership, for which the Managing
General Partner will receive an interest in continuing costs and revenues of the
Partnership. The 606 Interest Holders made total capital contributions of
$9,627,683.
Generally, all continuing costs (including development costs, operating
costs, general and administrative reimbursements and direct expenses) and
revenues are allocated 85 percent to the Interest Holders and 15 percent to the
general partners. After partnership payout, as defined in the Partnership
Agreement, continuing costs and revenues will be shared 75 percent by the
Interest Holders, and 25 percent by the general partners. Payout had not
occurred as of December 31, 1999.
During the first quarter of 2000, the Managing General Partner mailed
proxy material to the Interest Holders proposing to sell all the Partnership's
interests in oil and gas properties and dissolve and liquidate the Partnership.
In March 2000, the Interest Holders of the Partnership approved the proposal to
liquidate the Partnership. The Managing General Partner anticipates liquidation
will be substantially completed within the next two years.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies -
Use of Estimates --
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
estimates.
Oil and Gas Revenues --
Oil and gas revenues are reported using the entitlement method in which
the Partnership recognizes its interest in oil and natural gas production as
revenue.
Oil and Gas Properties --
The Partnership accounts for its ownership interest in oil and gas
properties using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the
Partnership's share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses is included in
the appropriate classification in the financial statements.
For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership follows the
"full-cost" method of accounting for oil and gas property costs. Under this
method of accounting, all productive and nonproductive costs incurred in the
acquisition and development of oil and gas reserves are capitalized. Such costs
include lease acquisitions, geological and geophysical services, drilling,
completion, equipment and certain general and administrative costs directly
associated with acquisition and development activities. General and
administrative costs related to production and general overhead are expensed as
incurred. No general and administrative costs were capitalized during the years
ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.
Future development, site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment
costs, net of salvage values, are estimated on a property-by-property basis
based on current economic conditions and are amortized to expense as the
Partnership's capitalized oil and gas property costs are amortized.
IV-7
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The unamortized cost of oil and gas properties is limited to the
"ceiling limitation", (calculated separately for the Partnership, limited
partners, and general partners). The "ceiling limitation" is calculated on a
quarterly basis and represents the estimated future net revenues from proved
properties using current prices, discounted at ten percent. Proceeds from the
sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are treated as a reduction of oil
and gas property costs with no gains or losses being recognized except in
significant transactions.
The Partnership computes the provision for depreciation, depletion and
amortization of oil and gas properties on the units-of-production method. Under
this method, the provision is calculated by multiplying the total unamortized
cost of oil and gas properties, including future development, site restoration,
dismantlement and abandonment costs, by an overall amortization rate that is
determined by dividing the physical units of oil and gas produced during the
period by the total estimated units of proved oil and gas reserves at the
beginning of the period.
The calculation of the "ceiling limitation" and the provision for
depreciation, depletion, and amortization is based on estimates of proved
reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
proved reserves and in projecting the future rates of production, timing and
plan of development. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the
quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and
judgment. Results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of
the estimate may justify revision of such estimate. Accordingly, reserve
estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are
ultimately recovered.
Cash and Cash Equivalents --
Highly liquid debt instruments with an initial maturity of three months
or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
Reclassifications --
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year balances to
conform with the current year presentation.
(3) Oil and Gas Capitalized Costs -
The following table sets forth capital expenditures related to the
Partnership's oil and gas operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Acquisition of
proved properties $ -- $ -- $ --
Development 40,416 129,565 201,391
------- ------- --------
$ 40,416 $129,565 $201,391
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
All oil and gas property acquisitions are made by Swift on behalf of
the Partnership. The costs of the properties include the purchase price plus any
costs incurred by Swift in the evaluation and acquisition of properties.
During 1998 and 1997, the Partnership's unamortized oil and gas
property costs exceeded the quarterly calculations of the "ceiling limitation"
resulting in an additional provision for depreciation, depletion and
amortization of $935,616 and $296,726, respectively. In addition, the Interest
Holders' share of unamortized oil and gas property costs exceeded their "ceiling
limitation" in 1998 and 1997, resulting in a valuation allowance of $748,635 and
$121,458, respectively. These amounts are included in the income (loss)
attributable to the Interest Holders shown in the statement of partners' capital
together with a "combining adjustment" for the difference between the Interest
Holders' valuation allowance and the Partnership's full cost ceiling write down.
The "combining adjustment" changes quarterly as the Partnership's total
depreciation, depletion and amortization provision is more or less than the
combined depreciation, depletion and amortization provision attributable to the
general partners and Interest Holders.
IV-8
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(4) Related-Party Transactions -
During 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Partnership paid Swift $82,493,
$107,375 and $144,415, respectively, as a general and administrative overhead
allowance.
During 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Partnership also paid Swift an
incentive amount, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, for services rendered
to the Partnership. Such amounts totaled $5,280 in 1999, $3,448 in 1998 and
$14,885 in 1997 and are included in general and administrative expenses.
Effective June 30, 1993, the Partnership entered into a Net Profits and
Overriding Royalty Interest Agreement ("NP/OR Agreement") with Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-B, Ltd. ("Pension Partnership"), managed by Swift for the
purpose of acquiring interests in producing oil and gas properties. Under the
terms of the NP/OR Agreement, the Partnership has conveyed to the Pension
Partnership a nonoperating interest in the aggregate net profits (i.e., oil and
gas sales net of related operating costs) of the properties acquired equal to
its proportionate share of the property acquisition costs.
(5) Federal Income Taxes -
The Partnership is not a tax-paying entity. No provision is made in the
accounts of the Partnership for federal or state income taxes, since such taxes
are liabilities of the individual partners, and the amounts thereof depend upon
their respective tax situations.
The tax returns and the amount of distributable Partnership income are
subject to examination by the federal and state taxing authorities. If the
Partnership's ordinary income for federal income tax purposes is ultimately
changed by the taxing authorities, the tax liability of the Interest Holders
could be changed accordingly. Ordinary income reported on the Partnership's
federal return of income for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997
was $140,570, $11,057 and $705,091, respectively. The difference between
ordinary income for federal income tax purposes reported by the Partnership and
net income or loss reported herein primarily results from the exclusion of
depletion (as described below) from ordinary income reported in the
Partnership's federal return of income.
For federal income tax purposes, depletion with respect to production
of oil and gas is computed separately by the partners and not by the
Partnership. Since the amount of depletion on the production of oil and gas is
not computed at the Partnership level, depletion is not included in the
Partnership's income for federal income tax purposes but is charged directly to
the partners' capital accounts to the extent of the cost of the leasehold
interests, and thus is treated as a separate item on the partners' Schedule K-1.
Depletion for federal income tax purposes may vary from that computed for
financial reporting purposes in cases where a ceiling adjustment is recorded, as
such amount is not recognized for tax purposes.
(6) Gas Imbalances -
The Partnership recognizes its ownership interest in natural gas
production as revenue. Actual production quantities sold may be different than
the Partnership's ownership share in a given period. If the Partnership's sales
exceed its ownership share of production, the differences are recorded as
deferred revenue. Gas balancing receivables are recorded when the Partnership's
ownership share of production exceeds sales.
(7) Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations -
The Partnership's revenues are primarily the result of sales of its oil
and natural gas production. Market prices of oil and natural gas may fluctuate
and adversely affect operating results.
IV-9
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED
In the normal course of business, the Partnership extends credit,
primarily in the form of monthly oil and gas sales receivables, to various
companies in the oil and gas industry which results in a concentration of credit
risk. This concentration of credit risk may be affected by changes in economic
or other conditions and may accordingly impact the Partnership's overall credit
risk. However, the Managing General Partner believes that the risk is mitigated
by the size, reputation, and nature of the companies to which the Partnership
extends credit. In addition, the Partnership generally does not require
collateral or other security to support customer receivables.
(8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments -
The Partnership's financial instruments consist of cash and cash
equivalents and short-term receivables and payables. The carrying amounts
approximate fair value due to the highly liquid nature of the short-term
instruments.
IV-10
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING
PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
(Registrant)
By: SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY
General Partner
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b A. Earl Swift
----------------- ------------------------------
A. Earl Swift
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 10, 2000 y: s/b John R. Alden
----------------- ------------------------------
John R. Alden
Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b Alton D. Heckaman, Jr.
----------------- ------------------------------
Alton D. Heckaman, Jr.
Principal Accounting Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING
PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
(Registrant)
By: SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY
General Partner
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b A. Earl Swift
------------------ ------------------------------
A. Earl Swift
Director and Principal
Executive Officer
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b Virgil N. Swift
------------------ ------------------------------
Virgil N. Swift
Director and Executive
Vice President - Business
Development
<PAGE>
SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING PARTNERS 1993-B, LTD.
SIGNATURES
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b G. Robert Evans
----------------- ------------------------------
G. Robert Evans
Director
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b Raymond O. Loen
----------------- ------------------------------
Raymond O. Loen
Director
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b Henry C. Montgomery
----------------- ------------------------------
Henry C. Montgomery
Director
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b Clyde W. Smith, Jr.
----------------- -------------------------------
Clyde W. Smith, Jr.
Director
Date: March 10, 2000 By: s/b Harold J. Withrow
----------------- -------------------------------
Harold J. Withrow
Director
V-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Oprating Partners 1993-B, Ltd's balance sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified
in it entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 107,842
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 111,964
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 219,806
<PP&E> 9,319,852
<DEPRECIATION> (7,567,892)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,996,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 44,304
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 1,931,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,996,430
<SALES> 574,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 576,658
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 456,079<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> (20,529)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (20,529)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (20,529)
<EPS-BASIC> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense. Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>
</TABLE>
