ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP /DE/
10-Q, 1999-11-17
SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES
Previous: MADDEN STEVEN LTD, S-3, 1999-11-17
Next: GUNTHER INTERNATIONAL LTD, 8-K, 1999-11-17





                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                               -------------------
                                    FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

[ x ] Quarterly  report  pursuant  to section 13 or 15(d) of the  securities
      exchange act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended JULY 3, 1999, or

[   ] Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the securities
      exchange act of 1934

      For the transition period from __________ to __________.

Commission file number:  0-22594

                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

                DELAWARE                                     77-0057842
    (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF              (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION
     INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)                           NUMBER)

                              2575 AUGUSTINE DRIVE
                       SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95054-2914
                    (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

      Registrant's telephone number, including area code is (408) 855-4900

                               -------------------


        Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
           Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

          TITLE OF EACH CLASS                     NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH
     Common Stock, par value $0.01                           REGISTERED
                                                               NASDAQ

Indicate  by check  mark  whether  the  registrant:  (1) has filed  all  reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____

As of November 12, 1999,  there were 42,159,028  shares of  Registrant's  Common
Stock outstanding.

                                      -1-
<PAGE>

                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

                                    FORM 10-Q
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      INDEX

                                                                            PAGE
PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 Item 1 Financial Statements:
<S>                                                                          <C>
        Condensed unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September
        30, 1999 and March 31, 1999...........................................3

        Condensed unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for
        the three and six months ended September 30, 1999 and 1998............4

        Condensed unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
        the six months ended September 30, 1999 and 1998......................5

        Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements........6

 Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
        Condition and Results of Operations..................................12


PART II OTHER INFORMATION

 Item 1 Legal Proceedings....................................................22

 Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders..................23

 Item 5 Other Information....................................................23

 Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.....................................24


SIGNATURES...................................................................25
</TABLE>

                                      -2-

<PAGE>

================================================================================
Part I - Financial Information

ITEM 1
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
                      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                      (in thousands, except share amounts)
                                   (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     September     March 31,
                                      30, 1999       1999
                                    ------------ ------------
              ASSETS
Current assets:
<S>                                 <C>            <C>
  Cash and cash equivalents          $ 14,538       $6,219
  Marketable securities                43,761            -
  Restricted cash                       3,675        5,175
  Accounts receivable, net              9,614        8,943
  Inventory                            26,084       12,927
  Related party receivables             1,888        1,815
  Other current assets                  2,072        1,709
                                    ------------ ------------
   Total current assets               101,632       36,788
Property and equipment, net             8,631        9,943
Investment in Chartered                51,596       51,596
Semiconductor
Investment in United Semiconductor     87,886       77,310
  Corporation
Investment in United Silicon, Inc.     16,799       16,799
Other investments                       8,087          550
Other assets                              684          571
                                    ============ ============
   Total assets                      $275,295     $193,557
                                    ============ ============

   LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
  Accounts payable                    $16,004       $8,046
  Accrued liabilities                   5,264        5,325
  Deferred income taxes                   554            -
  Current portion of long term            744        1,315
    obligations
                                    ------------ ------------
                                       22,566       14,686
      Total current liabilities
Long term liabilities:
  Long term obligations                   481          578
  Deferred income taxes                14,069       14,723
                                    ------------ ------------
                Total liabilities      37,116       29,987
                                    ------------ ------------

Stockholders' equity
  Common stock                            421          416
  Additional paid-in capital          190,921      185,025
  Retained earnings                    54,356       (3,505)
  Accumulated other comprehensive loss (7,519)     (18,366)
                                    ------------ ------------
   Total stockholders' equity         238,179      163,570
                                    ============ ============
     Total liabilities and
       stockholders' equity          $275,295     $193,557
                                    ============ ============
</TABLE>

         The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
                       consolidated financial statements.

                                      -3-

<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
                 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                      (in thousands, except share amounts)
                                   (unaudited)

                                     Three months     Six months ended
                                        ended           September 30,
                                     September 30,
                                  ------------------ -------------------
                                   1999      1998      1999      1998
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenue:
<S>                              <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
  Net revenues                    $19,112   $10,472  $36,823   $20,622
  Cost of revenues                 12,304    13,544   24,774    41,035
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
                                    6,808    (3,072)  12,049   (20,413)
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating expenses:
  Research and development          4,244     3,511    7,449     7,727
  Selling, general and              3,108     2,797    5,854     6,808
    administrative
                                --------- --------- --------- ---------
   Total operating expenses         7,352     6,308   13,303    14,535
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss from operations                 (544)   (9,380)  (1,254)  (34,948)
Gain on marketable securities       3,696         -   55,302    15,823
Other income (expense), net          (269)     (180)    (148)     (263)
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before income
taxes and equity in income of USC   2,883    (9,560)  53,900   (19,388)
Provision for income taxes          1,186         -      367     8,397
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before equity in      1,697    (9,560)  53,533   (27,785)
  income of USC
Equity in income of USC             2,796     3,691    4,328     7,237
                                 --------- --------- --------- ---------
  Net income (loss)                $4,493   ($5,869) $57,861  ($20,548)
                                 ========= ========= ========= =========

  Net income (loss) per share
   Basic                             $0.11   ($0.14)    $1.39    ($0.50)
                                 ========= ========= ========= =========
   Diluted                           $0.10   ($0.14)    $1.36    ($0.50)
                                 ========= ========= ========= =========

  Weighted average number of
    common shares
   Basic                           41,812    41,456   41,715    41,209
                                 ========= ========= ========= =========
   Diluted                         42,995    41,456   42,572    41,209
                                 ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>

         The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
                       consolidated financial statements.

                                      -4-

<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
                 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                 (in thousands)
                                   (unaudited)

                                          Six Months Ended
                                            September 30,
                                        --------------------
                                          1999        1998
                                        ---------   --------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
<S>                                      <C>        <C>
  Net (loss) income                      $57,861    ($20,548)
  Adjustments to reconcile net income
   (loss) to net cash provided by
   (used in) operating activities:
   Depreciation and amortization           2,193      1,900
   Equity in income of USC                (4,328)    (7,237)
   Gain on sale of long term investments
     and marketable securities           (55,302)   (15,823)
   Changes in assets and liabilities:
    Accounts receivable                     (671)     9,653
    Inventory                            (13,157)    13,867
    Related party receivables                (73)         -
    Other assets                            (467)      (258)
    Accounts payable                       7,958    (29,476)
    Accrued liabilities                      (61)      (273)
    Deferred income taxes and tax         (2,097)    25,466
      receivable
                                        ---------   --------
   Net cash used in operating             (8,144)   (22,729)
     activities
                                        ---------   --------

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
  Acquisition of equipment                  (796)    (1,578)
  Proceeds from sale of USC shares             -     31,662
  Proceeds from sale of Broadcom shares   18,063          -
  Investment in United Silicon, Inc.           -     (3,098)
  Other investments                       (7,537)         -
                                        ---------   --------
   Net cash provided by (used in)          9,730     26,986
     investing activities
                                        ---------   --------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
  Net proceeds from issuance of common     5,901         46
    stock
  Repayments of long term obligations       (668)      (952)
  Restricted cash                          1,500        762
                                        ---------   --------
   Net cash provided by financing          6,733       (144)
     activities
                                        ---------   --------

Net increase (decrease) in cash and        8,319      4,113
  cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning     6,219      3,010
  of the period
                                        ---------   --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of      $14,538     $7,123
  the period
                                        =========   ========
</TABLE>

         The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
                       consolidated financial statements.

                                      -5-

<PAGE>

                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

              NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   (unaudited)

Note 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying  unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
by Alliance  Semiconductor  Corporation  (the  "Company") in accordance with the
rules  and  regulations  of the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Certain
information and footnote  disclosure,  normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,  have been
condensed  or omitted in  accordance  with such  rules and  regulations.  In the
opinion  of  management,   the  accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial
statements reflect all adjustments  necessary to present fairly the consolidated
financial  position of the Company and its subsidiaries,  and their consolidated
results of operations and cash flows. These financial  statements should be read
in  conjunction  with the audited  consolidated  financial  statements and notes
thereto  for the fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  1999 and 1998  included in the
Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on July 1, 1999.

For purposes of presentation,  the Company has indicated the first six months of
fiscal 2000 and 1999 as ending on September 30, respectively;  whereas, in fact,
the Company's  fiscal  quarters ended on October 2, 1999 and September 26, 1998,
respectively.  The financial  results for the second  quarter of fiscal 2000 and
1999 were reported on a 13-week quarter.

The results of operations for the three months ended  September 30, 1999 are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the year ending
March 31, 2000 and the Company makes no representations related thereto.

Note 2. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 September    March 31,
                 30, 1999        1999
                ------------  -----------
Inventory:
<S>             <C>            <C>
  Work in        $11,337        $5,119
process
  Finished        14,747         7,808
goods
                ============  ===========
                 $26,084       $12,927
                ============  ===========
</TABLE>

Note 3. INVENTORY CHARGES AND VALUATION ALLOWANCE

During the second quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company experienced an improvement
in the average selling prices for certain  products and a higher demand for SRAM
and DRAM  products.  In the second  quarter of fiscal 2000,  the Company did not
require  additional  reserves  for lower of cost or market,  obsolete  or excess
inventory. This compares to a pre-tax inventory valuation charge of $2.9 million
for the same  period of fiscal  1999.  During the first and second  quarters  of
fiscal 1999, the Company recorded pre-tax charges aggregating  approximately $20
million.  These pre-tax charges were made to reflect a further decline in market
value of certain inventory and to provide  additional  reserves for obsolete and
excess inventory.  The Company is unable to predict future market prices for its
products.  A decline in average  selling prices for its products could result in
additional material inventory valuation adjustments and corresponding charges to
operations.

Note 4. INVESTMENTS

In  February  1995,   the  Company  agreed  to  purchase   shares  of  Chartered
Semiconductor  ("Chartered") for approximately  US$10 million and entered into a
manufacturing  agreement  under which Chartered will provide a minimum number of
wafers  from its 8-inch  wafer  fabrication  facility  known as "Fab2." In April
1995, the Company agreed to purchase  additional  shares in Chartered,  bringing
the total agreed  investment in Chartered to  approximately  US$51.6 million and
Chartered agreed to provide an increased minimum number of wafers to be provided
by Chartered  from Fab2.  The Company has paid all  installments  to  Chartered.
Chartered  went  public on the NASDAQ  stock  exchange on October  26,1999.  The
Company owns approximately 2.14 million American

                                      -6-

<PAGE>

Depository  Shares,  or ADSs.  Each ADS  represents  the  right to ten  ordinary
shares,  subject to a  six-month  "lock-up,"  or no trade  period.  Based on the
November 12, 1999 closing price for Chartered shares the estimated value of this
investment is $102 million.

In July 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with United Microelectronics
Corporation  ("UMC")  and S3  Incorporated  ("S3") to form a separate  Taiwanese
company,  United Semiconductor  Corporation ("USC"), for the purpose of building
and  managing an 8-inch  semiconductor  manufacturing  facility  in Taiwan.  The
Company paid  approximately 1 billion New Taiwan Dollars ("NTD")  (approximately
US$36.4 million) in September 1995, approximately NTD 450 million (approximately
US$16.4 million) in July 1996, and approximately NTD 492 million  (approximately
US$17.6  million)  in July  1997.  After the last  payment,  the  Company  owned
approximately 190 million shares of USC, or approximately 19% of the outstanding
shares. In April 1998, the Company sold 35 million shares of USC to an affiliate
of UMC and received  approximately  US$31.7 million. In connection with the sale
of 35 million  shares of USC, the Company has the right to receive up to another
665 million NTD  (approximately  US$20.9 million at the exchange rate prevailing
on  October  1,  1999,  which  rate is  subject  to  material  change)  upon the
occurrence of certain  potential  future events.  After the April 1998 sale, the
Company owned approximately  15.50% of the outstanding shares of USC. In October
1998,  USC  issued  46  million  shares  to  the  Company  by  way  of  dividend
distribution. Additionally, USC made a stock distribution to its employees. As a
result of this  distribution,  the  Company's  ownership  in USC was  reduced to
15.06% of the outstanding shares. In April 1999, USC issued 46 million shares to
the Company by way of dividend  distribution as well as  distributions  to other
entities.  As a result of these  distributions,  the Company owned approximately
14.76% of the outstanding shares. To the extent USC experiences operating income
or  losses  and the  Company  maintains  its  current  ownership  percentage  of
outstanding  shares, the Company will recognize its proportionate  share of such
income or  losses.  During  the first six  months of fiscal  2000,  the  Company
recorded  $4.3  million of equity in income of USC, as compared to $7.2  million
recorded during the first six months of fiscal 1999.

In October  1995,  the  Company  entered  into an  agreement  with UMC and other
parties to form a separate Taiwanese company, United Silicon, Inc. ("USIC"), for
the  purpose of building  and  managing  an 8-inch  semiconductor  manufacturing
facility in Taiwan.  The Company had  originally  committed to an  investment of
approximately US$60 million or 10% ownership interest but subsequently requested
that its level of  participation  be reduced by 50%.  The first  installment  of
approximately  50% of the revised  investment  was made in January 1996, and the
Company had, but did not  exercise,  the option to pay a second  installment  of
approximately  25% of the  revised  investment  payable in  December  1997.  The
Company made a third  installment  payment of approximately  106 million NTD (or
approximately  US$3.1 million) in July 1998.  After the third  installment,  the
Company owns  approximately  3.21% of the outstanding shares of USIC and has the
right to  purchase  approximately  3.70% of the  manufacturing  capacity  of the
facility. The Company is accounting for this investment using the cost method of
accounting.

In June 1999,  UMC  announced  plans to merge four  semiconductor  wafer foundry
units, USC, USIC, United Integrated  Circuit  Corporation and UTEK Semiconductor
Corporation,  into UMC, a publicly  traded  company in Taiwan.  According to the
proposed terms of the merger,  Alliance will receive 247.7 million shares of UMC
stock for its 247.7 million shares or 14.76% ownership of USC and  approximately
35.6 million shares of UMC stock for its 48.1 million shares or 3.21%  ownership
of USIC.  UMC has indicated that they expect to have  approximately  8.8 billion
shares  outstanding as of the closing date of the merger.  Based on the November
12, 1999  closing  price for UMC shares of NTD 86.00,  and the then current U.S.
dollar  exchange rate of 31.72,  the  estimated  value of these  investments  is
approximately  $768  million.  At  September  30,  1999 the book value for these
investments  was  approximately  $105  million  excluding  currency  translation
adjustment. The merger is subject to shareholders and government approval and is
expected to close in January 2000.  According to Taiwanese laws and regulations,
50% of the 283.3 million UMC shares Alliance  expects to receive will be subject
to a six-month  "lock-up" or no trade  period.  Of the  remaining  50%, or 141.6
million shares,  approximately 28.3 million shares will become eligible for sale
two years from the closing date of the  transaction,  with 28.3  million  shares
available for sale every six months thereafter during years three and four.

The Company has invested  approximately $7.5 million during the first six months
of  fiscal  2000 in a number  of  start-up  companies  whose  focus is  emerging
networking and internet market segments, where the Company can leverage its core
competencies  in  memory  technology.   The  Company  accounts  each  of  theses
investments using the cost method of accounting.

                                      -7-

<PAGE>


Note 5. GAIN ON SALE OF USC SHARES

In  April  1998,  the  Company  sold  35  million  shares  of USC  (representing
approximately  18% of the Company's  interest in USC) to an affiliate of UMC for
net proceeds of $31.7 million, plus the right to receive a contingent payment of
up to 665  million  NTD  (approximately  US$20.9  million at the  exchange  rate
prevailing  on October 1, 1999,  which rate is subject to material  change) upon
the occurrence of certain  potential  future  events.  The net gain on the sale,
after  deducting  the cost  basis  plus a share of the equity in income of those
shares disposed, was $15.8 million, which was included in Other Income, net.

Note 6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company adopted  Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 130 (SFAS
130),  "Reporting  Comprehensive  Income" in fiscal 1999.  SFAS 130  establishes
rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive  income and its components.
The following are the components of comprehensive income:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          Three months      Six months ended
                             ended           September 30,
                         September 30,
                        ------------------ ------------------
                          1999      1998     1999      1998
                        -------- --------- --------  --------
<S>                     <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
 Net income (loss)       $4,493   ($5,689) $57,861  ($20,548)
 Unrealized gain on
   marketable securities
   (net of deferred taxes
   of $2,652)            (9,249)        -    3,945        -
 Cumulative translation
   adjustments            2,508    (3,148)   6,902   (2,861)
                        ========  =======  ======== =========
   Comprehensive
     income (loss)      ($2,248)  ($8,837) $68,708 ($23,409)
                        ========  =======  ======== =========
</TABLE>


The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               September     March 31,
                               30, 1999        1999
                              -----------  ------------
<S>                             <C>          <C>
Unrealized gain on marketable
  securities (net of deferred
  taxes of $2,652)                $3,945             -
Cumulative translation
  adjustments                    (11,464)     ($18,366)
                              ===========  ============
  Accumulated other
    comprehensive loss           ($7,519)     ($18,366)
                              ===========  ============
</TABLE>

Note 7. PURCHASE ORDER COMMITMENTS


At  September  30,  1999,  the  Company  had  approximately  $ 30.4  million  of
non-cancelable purchase commitments with suppliers.  The Company expects to sell
all products which it has committed to purchase from suppliers.


Note 8. LETTERS OF CREDIT


As of  September  30,  1999,  $ 3.7  million of standby  letters of credit  were
outstanding  and  expire  on or  before  June 1,  2000,  which  are  secured  by
restricted cash and short-term investments.


Note 9. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income  available  to common  stockholders
(numerator)  by  the  weighted  average  number  of  common  shares  outstanding
(denominator)  during  the  period.  Diluted  EPS gives  effect to all  dilutive
potential common shares  outstanding  during the period including stock options,
using the treasury  stock  method.  In computing  Diluted EPS, the average stock
price for the period is used in  determining  the number of shares assumed to be
purchased from the proceeds obtained upon exercise of stock options.

                                      -8-

<PAGE>


The computations for basic and diluted EPS are presented below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Three months       Six months ended
                                      ended            September 30,
                                   September 30,
                                 ------------------  -------------------
                                  1999      1998      1999      1998
                                ---------  -------  --------- ---------
<S>                              <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)                $4,492    ($5,869) $57,860   ($20,548)
                                =========  =======  ========= =========
Weighted average shares          41,812     41,456   41,715     41,209
  outstanding
Effect of dilutive employee       1,174          -      857         -
  stock options
                                ---------  -------  --------- ---------
Average shares outstanding       42,986     41,456   42,572    41,209
  assuming dilution
                                =========  =======  ========= =========
Net income (loss) per share:
   Basic                          $0.11     ($0.14)   $1.39    ($0.50)
                                =========  =======  ========= =========
   Diluted                        $0.10     ($0.14)   $1.36    ($0.50)
                                =========  =======  ========= =========
</TABLE>

The following are not included in the above  calculation as they were considered
anti-dilutive:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Three months ended     Six months ended
                               September 30,          September 30,
                           -----------------------  -----------------
                             1999         1998       1999     1998
                           ----------  -----------  -------  --------
                           ==========  ===========  =======  ========
<S>                             <C>      <C>           <C>    <C>
Employee stock options          91       2,345         882    2,436
  outstanding
                           ==========  ===========  =======  ========
</TABLE>

Note 10.  LEGAL MATTERS

In March 1996, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and
certain of its officers and directors  and others in the United States  District
Court for the Northern  District of California,  alleging  violations of Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5
promulgated  thereunder.  The complaint alleged that the Company, N.D. Reddy and
C.N.  Reddy also had  liability  under  Section  20(a) of the Exchange  Act. The
complaint,  brought by an individual who claimed to have purchased 100 shares of
the Company's common stock on November 2, 1995, was putatively brought on behalf
of a class of persons who purchased the Company's  common stock between July 11,
1995 and December 29, 1995. In April 1997,  the Court  dismissed the  complaint,
with  leave to file an  amended  complaint.  In June  1997,  plaintiff  filed an
amended  complaint against the Company and certain of its officers and directors
alleging  violations  of Sections  10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange  Act. In July
1997,  The Company moved to dismiss the amended  complaint.  In March 1998,  the
court ruled in defendants' favor as to all claims but one, and dismissed all but
one claim with prejudice. In April 1998, defendants requested reconsideration of
the  ruling  as to the one  claim  not  dismissed.  In June  1998,  the  parties
stipulated to dismiss the remaining  claim without  prejudice,  on the condition
that in the event the dismissal  with  prejudice of the other claims is affirmed
in its entirety,  such remaining claim shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice.
In June 1998,  the court entered  judgment  dismissing  the case pursuant to the
parties'  stipulation.  The Company  intends to  continue  to defend  vigorously
against  any  claims  asserted  against  it,  and  believes  it has  meritorious
defenses. Due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, the Company is not able
to  reasonably  estimate the potential  losses,  if any, that may be incurred in
relation to this litigation.

In December 1996, Alliance Semiconductor  International  Corporation ("ASIC"), a
wholly-owned  subsidiary  of the Company  was served  with a complaint  filed in
Federal Court  alleging that ASIC has infringed two patents owned by AMD related
to flash memory devices,  and seeking  injunctive  relief and damages.  In March
1997, the Company was added as a defendant. In April 1996, the Court allowed AMD
to expand  its  claims to  include  several  new flash  products  which had been
recently announced by the Company. The Court has set a trial date for June 2000.
Each  defendant  has denied the  allegations  of the  complaint  and  asserted a
counterclaim  for  declaration  that each of the AMD  patents is invalid and not
infringed by such  defendant.  The Company  believes that the resolution of this
matter will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the
Company.

In July 1998, the Company learned that a default judgment may be entered against
the Company in Canada, in the amount of approximately  US$170 million, in a case
filed in 1985 captioned  Prabhakara  Chowdary Balla and TritTek Research Ltd. v.
Fitch Research  Corporation,  et al., British Columbia Supreme Court No. 85-2805
(Victoria Registry).  The Company,  which had previously not participated in the
case,  believes  that it never was properly  served with process in this action,
and that the Canadian court lacks  jurisdiction over the Company in this matter.
In  addition to  jurisdictional  and  procedural  arguments,  the  Company  also
believes it may have grounds to argue that the claims against the Company should
be deemed discharged by the Company's

                                      -9-

<PAGE>

bankruptcy in 1991. In February 1999,  the court set aside the default  judgment
against the Company.  In April 1999,  the  plaintiffs  were granted leave by the
Court to appeal this judgment. The appeal brief and reply briefs have been filed
and the parties are awaiting a decision by the appeals court.

In February 1997, Micron Technology, Inc. filed an antidumping petition with the
United  States   International   Trade  Commission  ("ITC")  and  United  States
Department of Commerce  ("DOC"),  alleging  that static  random access  memories
("SRAMs") fabricated in Taiwan were being sold in the United States at less than
fair value,  and that the United States industry  producing SRAMs was materially
injured  or  threatened  with  material  injury by reason  of  imports  of SRAMs
fabricated in Taiwan. After a final affirmative DOC determination of dumping and
a final affirmative ITC determination of injury,  DOC issued an antidumping duty
order in April 1998.  Under that order,  the  Company's  imports into the United
States on or after approximately April 16,1998 of SRAMs fabricated in Taiwan are
subject to a cash deposit in the amount of 50.15% (the "Antidumping  Margin") of
the entered  value of such SRAMs.  (The  Company  posted a bond in the amount of
59.06%  (the  preliminary  margin)  with  respect  to its  importation,  between
approximately  October 1997 and April 1998,  of SRAMs  fabricated in Taiwan.) In
May 1998,  the Company and others filed an appeal in the United  States Court of
International  Trade (the "CIT"),  challenging the determination by the ITC that
imports of  Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs were  causing  material  injury to the U.S.
industry.  On June  30,  1999 the CIT  issued a  decision  remanding  the  ITC's
affirmative material injury  determination to the ITC for  reconsideration.  The
ITC's  remand  determination   reaffirmed  its  original  determination  and  is
currently  being  considered  by the CIT. The decision of the CIT can be further
appealed  to the Court of Appeals for the Federal  Circuit.  The Company  cannot
predict either the timing or the eventual  results of the appeal.  Until a final
judgment  is entered in the  appeal,  no final  duties  will be  assessed on the
Company's  entries of SRAMs from  Taiwan  covered  by the DOC  antidumping  duty
order. If the appeal is successful, the antidumping order will be terminated and
cash deposits will be refunded with interest. If the appeal is unsuccessful, the
Company's entries of Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs from October 1, 1997 through March
31, 1999 will be  liquidated at the deposit rate in effect at the time of entry.
On subsequent entries of  Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs, the Company will continue to
make cash deposits in the amount of 50.15% of the entered value.  In April 2000,
the  Company  will  have an  opportunity  to  request  a review  of its sales of
Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs from April 1, 1999 through  March 31, 2000 (the "Review
Period").  If it does so,  the amount of  antidumping  duties,  if any,  owed on
imports from April 1999 through  March 2000 will remain  undetermined  until the
conclusion of the review in early 2001. If the DOC found, based upon analysis of
the Company's  sales during the Review Period,  that  antidumping  duties either
should not be imposed or should be imposed at a lower rate than the  Antidumping
Margin,  the difference  between the cash deposits made by the Company,  and the
deposits  that would have been made had the lower rate (or no rate,  as the case
may be) been in effect, would be returned to the Company, plus interest.  If, on
the other hand, the DOC found that higher margins were appropriate,  the Company
would have to pay  difference  between the cash deposits paid by the Company and
the  deposits  that would have been made had the higher  rate been in effect.  A
material portion of the SRAMs designed and sold by the Company are fabricated in
Taiwan,  and the cash deposit  requirement  and  possibility  of  assessment  of
antidumping  duties could materially  adversely affect the Company's  ability to
sell  Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs in the United States and have a material  adverse
effect on the Company's operating results and financial condition.  At September
30,  1999,  the Company  had posted a bond  secured by a letter of credit in the
amount of  approximately  $1.7  million and made cash  deposits in the amount of
$1.7 million relating to the Company's importation of Taiwan-manufactured SRAMs.

In October 1998, Micron Technology,  Inc. filed an antidumping petition with the
DOC  and the  ITC,  alleging  that  dynamic  random  access  memories  ("DRAMs")
fabricated  in Taiwan  are  being  sold in the  United  States at less than fair
value, and that the United States industry producing DRAMs is materially injured
or threatened with material  injury by reason of imports of DRAMs  fabricated in
Taiwan. The petition requests the United States government to impose antidumping
duties on  imports  into the United  States of DRAMs  fabricated  in Taiwan.  In
December  1998,  the ITC  preliminarily  determined  that there is a  reasonable
indication that the imports of the products under investigation are injuring the
United States industry.  The Company received a questionnaire  from the DOC, and
responded to such questionnaire in accordance with the established  deadline. In
January 1999,  the DOC decided to limit the number of  respondents  investigated
and notified Alliance that it would not be separately investigated.  In May 1999
the DOC issued a preliminary  affirmative  determination of dumping.  Under that
determination,  the Company's imports into the United States on or after May 28,
1999 of DRAMs  fabricated in Taiwan were subject to an antidumping  duty deposit
in the amount of 16.65% (the preliminary "all others" rate) of the entered value
of  such  DRAMs,  an  antidumping  margin  calculated  by  weight-averaging  the
antidumping  margins of  individually  investigated  respondent  companies.  The
Company posted a bond to cover deposits on such entries. In October 1999 the DOC
issued a final affirmative  determination of dumping.  Under that determination,
the  Company's  imports into the United  States on or after  October 19, 1999 of
DRAMs fabricated in

                                      -10-

<PAGE>

Taiwan are subject to an antidumping duty deposit in the amount of 21.35%,  (the
final  "all-others"  rate). At September 30, 1999, the Company had posted a bond
secured by a letter of credit in the amount of $1.0 million to cover deposits on
such entries.  The ITC final determination of injury is due December 2, 1999. If
the ITC final  determination  of injury is  affirmative,  the DOC will  issue an
antidumping  duty  order.  Under  any  such  order,  the  Company's  imports  of
Taiwan-fabricated DRAMs into the United States on or after the date the order is
published  will be  subject  to a cash  deposit  in the amount of the final "all
others"  rate  of  the  entered  value  of  such  DRAMs.   If  the  ITC's  final
determination is negative, the investigation will be terminated,  the suspension
of liquidation  lifted,  and the bond released.  If an antidumping duty order is
issued, in late 2000 the Company will have an opportunity to request a review of
its  sales of  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs  from  approximately  May  1999  through
December 2000 (the "Review  Period").  If the Company makes such a request,  the
amount of antidumping  duties,  if any, owed on entries during the Review Period
will remain  undetermined until the conclusion of the review in late 2001, which
would determine a  Company-specific  antidumping duty margin.  If the DOC found,
based upon  analysis  of the  Company's  sales  during the Review  Period,  that
antidumping  duties either should not be imposed or should be imposed at a lower
rate than the final "all others" rate determined in the original  investigation,
the difference  between the cash deposits made by the Company,  and the deposits
that would  have been made had the lower  rate (or no rate,  as the case may be)
been in effect,  would be returned to the  Company,  with  interest.  If, on the
other hand, the DOC found a higher Company-specific rate, the Company would have
to pay the  difference  between  the cash  deposits  paid by the Company and the
deposits  that  would have been made had the  higher  rate been in effect,  with
interest.  (The Company also would be responsible for antidumping  duties in the
amount of the  revised  margin with  respect to its imports  covered by bond.) A
material portion of the DRAMs designed and sold by the Company are fabricated in
Taiwan,  and the cash deposit  requirement  and  possibility  of  assessment  of
antidumping  duties could materially  adversely affect the Company's  ability to
sell  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs in the United States and have a material  adverse
effect on the Company's operating results and financial condition.


Note 11.  ACQUISITION OF MAVERICK NETWORKS BY BROADCOM  CORPORATION

On May 31,  1999,  Maverick  Networks  (an entity in which the Company had a 28%
interest in) completed a transaction with Broadcom Corporation, resulting in the
Company  selling its  ownership  interest in Maverick  Networks in exchange  for
538,961 shares of Broadcom's Class B common stock.  Based on Broadcom's  closing
share  price on the date of sale,  the  Company  recorded a pre-tax  gain in the
first quarter of fiscal 2000 of approximately  $51.6 million,  which is included
in  Other  Income,  net.  Subsequent  to the  transaction  date,  the  Company's
investment in Broadcom  Corporation  is being be accounted for as "available for
sale"  securities  in  accordance  with  FAS  115.  According  to the  Company's
agreement with Broadcom,  10% or 53,896 shares of Broadcom stock will be held in
escrow for six months until November 30,1999 to potentially  compensate Broadcom
for losses, if any, Broadcom may incur if Maverick breaches the merger agreement
or misrepresented information in the transaction. During the first six months of
fiscal 2000,  the Company sold 150,000  shares of Broadcom  stock and realized a
pre-tax gain of approximately $3.7 million. At September 30, 1999, the Company's
unrealized  gain in Broadcom is $6.6 million,  which has been  recorded,  net of
tax, as other comprehensive income.

                                      -11-

<PAGE>


ITEM 2
MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

WHEN  USED  IN THIS  REPORT,  THE  WORDS  "EXPECTS,"  ANTICIPATES,"  "BELIEVES,"
"APPROXIMATES,"  "ESTIMATES"  AND SIMILAR  EXPRESSIONS  ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY
FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS  WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS AMENDED. SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE STATEMENTS CONCERNING
THE TIMING OF NEW PRODUCT  INTRODUCTIONS;  THE FUNCTIONALITY AND AVAILABILITY OF
PRODUCTS  UNDER  DEVELOPMENT;  TRENDS  IN  THE  PERSONAL  COMPUTER,  NETWORKING,
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INSTRUMENTATION MARKETS, IN PARTICULAR AS THEY MAY AFFECT
DEMAND FOR OR PRICING OF THE COMPANY'S PRODUCTS;  THE PERCENTAGE OF EXPORT SALES
AND SALES TO STRATEGIC CUSTOMERS; THE PERCENTAGE OF REVENUE BY PRODUCT LINE; AND
THE AVAILABILITY AND COST OF PRODUCTS FROM THE COMPANY'S SUPPLIERS;  ARE SUBJECT
TO RISKS AND  UNCERTAINTIES.  THESE RISKS AND  UNCERTAINTIES  INCLUDE  THOSE SET
FORTH IN ITEM 2 (ENTITLED  "MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS")  OF THIS REPORT,  AND IN ITEM 1 (ENTITLED
"BUSINESS")  OF  PART I AND IN ITEM 7  (ENTITLED  "MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL  CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS")  OF PART II OF THE
COMPANY'S  ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL  YEAR ENDED  APRIL 3, 1999
FILED WITH THE  SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE  COMMISSION  ON JULY 1, 1999,  AND THE
SUBSEQUENT  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER  ENDING JULY 3, 1999.
THESE RISKS AND  UNCERTAINTIES,  OR THE OCCURRENCE OF OTHER EVENTS,  COULD CAUSE
ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN THE  FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS.  THESE FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE OF THIS
REPORT. THE COMPANY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION OR UNDERTAKING TO RELEASE
PUBLICLY ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO ANY  FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED
HEREIN TO REFLECT ANY CHANGE IN THE COMPANY'S  EXPECTATIONS  WITH REGARD THERETO
OR TO REFLECT ANY CHANGE IN EVENTS,  CONDITIONS  OR  CIRCUMSTANCES  ON WHICH ANY
SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT IS BASED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth,  for the periods  indicated,  certain  operating
data as a percentage of net revenue:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Three months ended    Six months ended
                                    September 30,         September 30,
                                 ---------------------  ------------------
                                   1999        1998      1999      1998
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
<S>                               <C>          <C>        <C>       <C>
Net revenues                      100.0%       100.0%     100.0%    100.0%
Cost of revenues                   64.4        129.3       67.3     198.9
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
  Gross profit (loss)              35.6        (29.3)      32.7     (98.9)
Operating expenses:
  Research and development         22.2         33.5       20.2      37.5
  Selling, general and             16.3         26.7       15.9      33.0
administrative
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
Total operating expenses           38.5         60.2       36.1      70.5
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
Loss from operations               (2.8)       (89.5)      (3.4)   (169.4)
Gain on Marketable Securities      19.3                   150.2
Other income (expense), net        (1.4)        (1.7)      (0.4)     75.4
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
Income (loss) before income
  taxes and equity in income of
  United Semiconductor
  Corporation ("USC")              15.1        (91.2)     146.4     (94.0)
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
Provision for income taxes          6.2          -          1.0      40.7
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
Income (loss) before equity in      8.9        (91.2)     145.4    (134.7)
income of USC
Equity in income of USC            14.6         35.2       11.8      35.1
                                 ----------  ---------  --------  --------
Net income (loss)                  23.5%       (56.0%)    157.1%    (99.6%)
                                 ==========  =========  ========  ========
</TABLE>

NET REVENUES

Net  revenues  increased  by 82% to $19.1  million  for the three  months  ended
September 1999 from $10.4 million for the similar period in 1998.  This increase
in revenues was mainly due to the higher unit shipments of dynamic random access
memory ("DRAM") and static random access memory ("SRAM") products combined with
an overall increase in the average selling prices of the Company's products. Net
revenues  for the six months  ended  September  1999  increased  by 79% to $36.8
million  compared  to $20.6  million  during the same  period one year ago.  Net
revenues  for the  second  quarter  of  fiscal  2000  (September  1999  quarter)
increased 8% over net

                                      -12-

<PAGE>

revenues  reported in the first fiscal  quarter (June 1999 quarter) and 38% over
the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 (March 1999 quarter).

Revenues from the Company's DRAM products  contributed  approximately 61% of the
Company's net revenues for the September 1999 quarter and  approximately  38% of
the  Company's net revenues for the  September  1998 quarter.  The DRAM revenues
increased  by 161% to $11.3  million for the  September  1999  quarter from $4.0
million  for  the  September  1998  quarter.  The  net  increase  was  due  to a
combination of higher average selling prices on some of the DRAM products and an
increase in unit shipments.

Revenues from the Company's SRAM products  contributed  approximately 38% of the
Company's net revenues for the September 1999 quarter and  approximately  61% of
the  Company's net revenues for the  September  1998 quarter.  The SRAM revenues
increased  by 21% to $7.6  million  for the  September  1999  quarter  from $6.3
million  for  the  September  1998  quarter.  The  net  increase  was  due  to a
combination of higher average selling prices on some of the SRAM products and an
increase in unit shipments.

Revenues from the Company's  graphics  products  contributed less than 1% of the
Company's net revenues for quarters ending September 1999 and September 1998.

Generally,  the markets for the Company's products are characterized by volatile
supply and demand conditions,  numerous competitors,  rapid technological change
and product  obsolescence.  These  conditions  could require the Company to make
significant  shifts in its product  mix in a  relatively  short  period of time.
These changes involve  several risks,  including,  among others,  constraints or
delays in timely deliveries of products from the Company's suppliers; lower than
anticipated  wafer  manufacturing  yields;  lower than expected  throughput from
assembly  and test  suppliers;  and less than  anticipated  demand  and  selling
prices.  The occurrence of any problems  resulting from these risks could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's operating results.

GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)

The Company experienced a gross profit of $6.8 million for the second quarter of
fiscal 2000, or 36% of net revenues compared to a gross loss of $3.1 million, or
(30%) of net revenues for the same period of fiscal 1999.  The increase in gross
profits  primarily  resulted from higher overall  average selling prices for the
Company's DRAM and SRAM products and higher unit  shipments.  The second quarter
of fiscal 1999  included a $2.9  million  pre-tax  inventory  charge.  The gross
profit  was $12.0  million  or 33% of net  revenues  for the first six months of
fiscal 2000  compared to a gross loss of $20.4  million,  or (99%) for the first
six months of fiscal 1999.  The first six months of fiscal 1999 included a $20.0
million pre-tax inventory charge.

The Company is subject to a number of factors  which may have an adverse  impact
on gross  margins  including  the  availability  and cost of  products  from the
Company's suppliers; increased competition and related decreases in average unit
selling  prices;  changes in the mix of  products  sold;  timing of new  product
introductions  and  volume  shipments;  and  antidumping  duties  related to the
importation  of products from Taiwan.  In addition,  the Company may seek to add
additional  foundry suppliers and transfer existing and newly developed products
to more advanced manufacturing processes. The commencement of manufacturing at a
new foundry is often characterized by lower yields as the manufacturing  process
is refined.  There can be no assurance that one or more of the factors set forth
in this paragraph will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's gross
margins in future periods.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development  expenses consist  principally of salaries and benefits
for  engineering  design,  contracted  development  efforts,  facilities  costs,
equipment and software  depreciation and  amortization,  wafer masks and tooling
costs, test wafers and other expense items.

Research and  development  expenses were $4.2 million,  or 22% of net revenue in
the second  quarter  of fiscal  2000  compared  to $3.5  million,  or 33% of net
revenue in the same period of the prior  fiscal year.  Research and  development
expenses in the first six months of fiscal 2000 were $7.4 million, or 20% of net
revenues compared to $7.7 million,  or 37% for the same period one year ago. The
decrease in research and development expenses for the first six months of fiscal
2000 as compared to the same period last year, was the effect of headcount

                                      -13-

<PAGE>

reductions and the discontinuance of the MMUI accelerator product line offset by
an increase in masks and tooling costs for new products.

The Company  believes that investments in research and development are necessary
to  remain  competitive  in  the  marketplace  and  accordingly,   research  and
development expenses may increase in absolute dollars and may also increase as a
percentage of net revenue in future periods.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

Selling,  general and  administrative  expenses  generally  include salaries and
benefits, sales commissions, marketing costs, travel, equipment depreciation and
software  amortization,  facilities costs, bad debt expense as well as insurance
and  legal  costs for the  Company's  sales,  marketing,  customer  support  and
administrative personnel.

Selling,  general and administrative  expenses were $3.1 million,  or 16% of net
revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2000 compared to $2.8 million, or 27% of
net  revenue  in the same  period of the prior  fiscal  year.  For the first six
months of fiscal  2000,  expenses  were $5.9  million,  or 16%  compared to $6.8
million,   or  33%  one  year  ago.  The   decrease  in  selling,   general  and
administrative  expenses for the first six months of fiscal 2000 compared to one
year ago was  primarily  the result of lower  headcount  and  personnel  related
costs,  lower  legal  and bad debt  expenses,  offset  in part by  higher  sales
commissions  due to  increased  revenue.  Selling,  general  and  administrative
expenses may increase in absolute  dollars and may also increase as a percentage
of net revenue in future periods.

GAIN ON MARKETABLE SECURITIES

On May 31,  1999,  Maverick  Networks  (an entity in which the Company had a 28%
interest in) completed a transaction with Broadcom Corporation, resulting in the
Company  selling its  ownership  interest in Maverick  Networks in exchange  for
538,961 shares of Broadcom's Class B common stock.  Based on Broadcom's  closing
share  price on the date of sale,  the  Company  recorded a pre-tax  gain in the
first quarter of fiscal 2000 of approximately  $51.6 million,  which is included
in  Other  Income,  Net.  Subsequent  to the  transaction  date,  the  Company's
investment in Broadcom  Corporation  is being be accounted for as "available for
sale"  securities  in  accordance  with  FAS  115.  According  to the  Company's
agreement with Broadcom,  10% or 53,896 shares of Broadcom stock will be held in
escrow for six months until November 30,1999 to potentially  compensate Broadcom
for losses, if any, Broadcom may incur if Maverick breaches the merger agreement
or misrepresented information in the transaction. During the first six months of
fiscal 2000,  the Company sold 150,000  shares of Broadcom  stock and realized a
pre-tax gain of approximately $3.7 million. At September 30, 1999, the Company's
unrealized  gain in Broadcom is $6.6 million,  which has been  recorded,  net of
tax, as other comprehensive income.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

During  the first six  months of fiscal  2000,  the  Company  recorded a net tax
expense of $367,000. For the second quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company recorded
a $1.2 million tax expense on an estimated  $2.9 million of taxable book income.
This was partially  offset by  approximately  $819,000 in recognition of the tax
benefits associated with loss carryforwards and tax credits, which are available
to offset the gain on marketable securities related to the Broadcom shares.

EQUITY IN INCOME OF USC

As discussed in the section below entitled  "Liquidity  and Capital  Resources",
the Company  entered  into an  agreement  with other  parties to form a separate
Taiwanese company, USC. This investment is accounted for under the equity method
of accounting  with a ninety-day lag in reporting the Company's share of results
for the entity.  Equity in income of USC reflects the company's  share of income
earned by USC for the previous quarter. Equity income from USC for the first six
months of fiscal 2000 was $4.3 million,  or 11.8% of net revenues as compared to
$7.2 million or 35% of net revenues  reported for the same period last year. The
decrease was primarily due to lower  operating  income well as a decrease in the
Company's ownership percentage from approximately 15.49% to 14.76%.

                                      -14-

<PAGE>

IMPACT OF YEAR 2000 ISSUES

The Company uses a number of computer  software  programs and operating  systems
and  intelligent  hardware  devices  in  its  internal   operations,   including
information  technology (IT) and non-IT systems used in the design,  manufacture
and marketing of Company  products.  These items are  considered to be year 2000
"objects" and to the extent that these objects are unable to correctly recognize
and  process  date  dependent  information  beyond the year 1999,  some level of
modification or replacement is necessary.  Most computer  programs were designed
to perform data  computations on the last two digits of the numerical value of a
year. When a computation  referencing the year 2000 is performed,  these systems
may  interpret  "00"  as  the  year  1900  and  could  either  stop   processing
date-related  computations  or  could  process  them  incorrectly.  Computations
referencing  the year 2000 might be invoked at any time, but are likely to begin
occurring in the year 1999.

The Company has completed a company-wide year 2000 readiness  assessment and has
completed  implementing a new management  information system,  which the Company
believes is year 2000  compliant.  The Company now believes that it is year 2000
ready to the best of its  knowledge.  During  fiscal  years  1999 and 1998,  the
Company spent approximately $2.6 million in connection with implementing the new
information systems. The Company does not anticipate that it will incur material
expenditures  for the  resolution of any year 2000 issues  relating to its IT or
non-IT systems in the current fiscal year.

The Company  could  possibly be materially  adversely  impacted by the year 2000
issues  faced  by  major  distributors,  suppliers,  subcontractors,  customers,
vendors,  and financial service  organizations with which the Company interacts.
The Company is determining the impact of the Company's operations as a result of
the year  2000  readiness  of these  third  parties.  In the event  2000  issues
relating to key customers and suppliers are not successfully resolved,  based on
information  available  to us at  present,  the Company  believes  that the most
reasonably   likely   worst  case   scenario  is  a  temporary   disruption   in
infrastructure  service,  which could adversely  impact  supplier  deliveries or
customer  shipments.  If  severe  disruptions  occur in these  areas and are not
corrected in a timely manner, a revenue or profit shortfall may result in fiscal
year 2000.  The Company has completed its  assessment of year 2000  readiness of
its major  suppliers  and  vendors and  believes  that its major  suppliers  and
vendors are year 2000 ready based on discussions and representations.

Year 2000  compliance  issues could have a  significant  impact on the Company's
operations and its financial  results if unforeseen needs or problems arise; or,
if the systems operated by the Company's  customers,  vendors or  subcontractors
are not year 2000 compliant. Due to the general uncertainty inherent in the year
2000 problem,  resulting in part from the uncertainty of the year 2000 readiness
of  third-parties  and the  interconnection  of global  businesses,  the Company
cannot  ensure  its  ability  to timely and  cost-effectively  resolve  problems
associated with the year 2000 issue that may affect its operations and business,
or expose it to third-party liability.

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

The Company's quarterly and annual operating results have historically been, and
will  continue  to be,  subject to  quarterly  and other  fluctuations  due to a
variety of factors, including:  general economic conditions;  changes in pricing
policies by the Company,  its  competitors  or its  suppliers;  anticipated  and
unanticipated  decreases  in  unit  average  selling  prices  of  the  Company's
products;  fluctuations  in  manufacturing  yields,  availability  and  cost  of
products from the Company's suppliers;  the timing of new product  announcements
and  introductions  by the  Company  or its  competitors;  changes in the mix of
products sold; the cyclical nature of the  semiconductor  industry;  the gain or
loss of  significant  customers;  increased  research and  development  expenses
associated with new product introductions;  market acceptance of new or enhanced
versions of the Company's products;  seasonal customer demand; and the timing of
significant  orders.  Operating  results  could also be  adversely  affected  by
economic  conditions  generally or in various geographic areas, other conditions
affecting the timing of customer orders and capital spending,  a downturn in the
market  for  personal   computers,   or  order  cancellations  or  rescheduling.
Additionally,  because  the Company is  continuing  to  increase  its  operating
expenses  for  personnel  and new  product  development  to be  able to  support
increased  sales  levels,  the  Company's  operating  results  will be adversely
affected if such increased sales levels are not achieved.

The markets for the Company's products are characterized by rapid  technological
change, evolving industry standards,  product obsolescence and significant price
competition  and,  as a result,  are  subject to  decreases  in average  selling
prices.  The Company has experienced  significant  deterioration  in the average
selling  prices  for its SRAM and DRAM  products  during  the past 3 years.  The
Company is unable to predict when or if such decline

                                      -15-

<PAGE>

in prices will stabilize. Historically, average selling prices for semiconductor
memory  products  have  declined and the Company  expects  that average  selling
prices  will  decline  in the  future.  Accordingly,  the  Company's  ability to
maintain  or  increase  revenues  will be highly  dependent  on its  ability  to
increase  unit sales volume of existing  products and to  successfully  develop,
introduce  and sell new products.  Declining  average  selling  prices will also
adversely  affect the  Company's  gross  margins  unless the  Company is able to
significantly  reduce its cost per unit in an amount to offset the  declines  in
average selling prices.  There can be no assurance that the Company will be able
to increase unit sales volumes of existing products, develop, introduce and sell
new  products or  significantly  reduce its cost per unit.  There also can be no
assurance  that even if the  Company  were to  increase  unit sales  volumes and
sufficiently reduce its costs per unit, the Company would be able to maintain or
increase revenues or gross margins.

The Company  usually  ships more product in the third month of each quarter than
in either of the first two months of the  quarter,  with  shipments in the third
month  higher  at the end of the  month.  This  pattern,  which is common in the
semiconductor industry, is likely to continue. The concentration of sales in the
last  month  of the  quarter  may  cause  the  Company's  quarterly  results  of
operations  to be more  difficult  to predict.  Moreover,  a  disruption  in the
Company's  production  or shipping  near the end of a quarter  could  materially
reduce the  Company's  net sales for that  quarter.  The  Company's  reliance on
outside  foundries  and  independent  assembly  and testing  houses  reduces the
Company's ability to control, among other things, delivery schedules.

The  cyclical  nature of the  semiconductor  industry  periodically  results  in
shortages of advanced process wafer fabrication capacity such as the Company has
experienced from time to time. The Company's ability to maintain adequate levels
of inventory is primarily dependent upon the Company obtaining sufficient supply
of products to meet future demand,  and any inability of the Company to maintain
adequate inventory levels may adversely affect its relations with its customers.
In addition,  the Company must order products and build inventory  substantially
in advance of products  shipments,  and there is a risk that because  demand for
the  Company's  products is volatile and subject to rapid  technology  and price
change, the Company will forecast incorrectly and produce excess or insufficient
inventories of particular  products.  This inventory risk is heightened  because
certain of the Company's key customers  place orders with short lead times.  The
Company's  customers' ability to reschedule or cancel orders without significant
penalty could adversely  affect the Company's  liquidity,  as the Company may be
unable to adjust its  purchases  from its  independent  foundries  to match such
customer changes and cancellations.  The Company has in the past produced excess
quantities of certain  products,  which has had a material adverse effect on the
Company's  operating results.  There can be no assurance that the Company in the
future will not produce excess quantities of any of its products.  To the extent
the Company produces excess or insufficient  inventories of particular products,
the Company's operating results could be adversely affected,  as was the case in
fiscal 1999,  fiscal 1998 and fiscal  1997,  when the Company  recorded  pre-tax
charges  totaling  approximately  $20  million,  $15  million  and $17  million,
respectively,  primarily  to  reflect  a  decline  in  market  value of  certain
inventory.

The Company  currently  relies on  independent  and joint  venture  foundries to
manufacture all of the Company's products.  Reliance on these foundries involves
several  risks,  including  constraints  or  delays in  timely  delivery  of the
Company's products,  reduced control over delivery schedules,  quality assurance
and costs and loss of production due to seismic activity, weather conditions and
other  factors.  In or about  October  1997, a fire caused  extensive  damage to
United Integrated Circuits Corporation ("UICC"), a foundry joint venture between
UMC and various companies.  UICC is located next to USIC and near USC and UMC in
the  Hsin-Chu   Science-Based   Industrial   Park.  (The  Company  has  products
manufactured  at UMC and USC,  and owns  equity  stakes in USC and  USIC.)  UICC
suffered an additional fire in January 1998, and since October 1996,  there have
been at least two other fires at semiconductor  manufacturing  facilities in the
Hsin-Chu Science-Based Industrial Park.

In  September  1999 a major  earthquake  occurred in Taiwan.  At the time of the
earthquake,  the  Company  had little  material in  production  at UMC's  Taiwan
foundry  locations,  since most of it's SRAM  production is now  manufactured by
Chartered Semiconductor in Singapore,  and Alliance had recently shifted a large
percentage  of it's DRAM  production  to UMC's  foundry  in Japan.  The  Company
experienced  some short-term  disruption at Taiwan assembly and test subcontract
houses.  According to UMC, damage to the foundries was significantly less severe
than originally  estimated,  and all foundry  installations and equipment are in
good condition with less than 10% of the total wafers in production at UMC Group
foundries affected.

There can be no assurance that fires,  earthquakes  or other  disasters will not
have a material  adverse effect on UMC, USC or USIC in the future.  In addition,
as a result  of the  rapid  growth of the  semiconductor  industry  based in the
Hsin-Chu  Science-Based  Industrial Park, severe constraints have been placed on
the water and electricity

                                      -16-

<PAGE>

supply in that region.  Any shortages of water or  electricity  could  adversely
affect the Company's foundries' ability to supply the Company's products,  which
could have a material  adverse effect on the Company's  results of operations or
financial  condition.  Although the Company  continuously  evaluates  sources of
supply  and  may  seek  to add  additional  foundry  capacity,  there  can be no
assurance that such additional capacity can be obtained at acceptable prices, if
at all. The occurrence of any supply or other problem resulting from these risks
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's  operating results, as was
the  case  during  the  third  quarter  of  fiscal  1996,  during  which  period
manufacturing  yields of one of the Company's products were materially adversely
affected by manufacturing  problems at one of the Company's  foundry  suppliers.
There can be no assurance that other problems affecting  manufacturing yields of
the Company's products will not occur in the future.

There is an ongoing risk that the  suppliers of wafer  fabrication,  wafer sort,
assembly and test  services to the Company may increase the price charged to the
Company for the services they provide,  to the point that the Company may not be
able to profitably have its products produced at such suppliers.  The occurrence
of such price  increases  could have a material  adverse effect on the Company's
operating results.

The Company conducts a significant  portion of its business  internationally and
is  subject  to a number of risks  resulting  from such  operations.  Such risks
include  political and economic  instability and changes in diplomatic and trade
relationships,  foreign currency fluctuations,  unexpected changes in regulatory
requirements,  delays resulting from difficulty in obtaining export licenses for
certain technology, tariffs and other barriers and restrictions, and the burdens
of complying with a variety of foreign laws.  Because the Company  conducts most
of its  manufacturing  operations in Asia, and receives a significant  amount of
its net revenue from sales to Asian customers, the foregoing risks heightened in
light of the recent financial and economic crisis in Asia.  Current or potential
customers of the Company in Asia, for instance,  may become  unwilling or unable
to purchase the Company's  products,  and the Company's Asian competitors may be
able to become more  price-competitive  relative to the Company due to declining
values of their national currencies. There can be no assurance that such factors
will not  adversely  impact  the  Company's  operating  results in the future or
require the Company to modify its current business practices.

Additionally,  other  factors  may  materially  adversely  affect the  Company's
operating  results.  The Company relies on domestic and offshore  subcontractors
for die assembly and testing of products,  and is subject to risks of disruption
in adequate supply of such services and quality problems with such services. The
Company is subject to the risks of shortages of goods or services and  increases
in the  cost  of raw  materials  used  in the  manufacture  or  assembly  of the
Company's  products.  The Company  faces  intense  competition,  and many of its
principal  competitors  and potential  competitors  have  substantially  greater
financial,  technical,  marketing,  distribution  and other  resources,  broader
product lines and  longer-standing  relationships  with  customers than does the
Company,  any  of  which  factors  may  place  such  competitors  and  potential
competitors in a stronger  competitive  position than the Company. The Company's
corporate headquarters are located near major earthquake faults, and the Company
is subject to the risk of damage or disruption in the event of seismic activity.
There can be no assurance that any of the foregoing  factors will not materially
adversely affect the Company's operating results.

In 1999,  the Company  adopted SFAS No. 130,  "Reporting  Comprehensive  Income.
"Comprehensive  income is defined as the change in equity of a company  during a
period  from  transactions  and  other  events  and   circumstances,   excluding
transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.

In 1999,  the Company  adopted SFAS No. 131,  "Disclosures  about Segments of an
Enterprise  and  Related   Information."   SFAS  No.  131  supersedes  SFAS  No.
14,"Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise," and replaces the
"industry  segment"  approach with the  "management"  approach.  The  management
approach  designates  the internal  organization  that is used by management for
making  operating  decisions  and  assessing  performance  as  the  source  of a
company's  reportable  segments.  SFAS No. 131 also requires  disclosures  about
products and services,  geographic  areas, and major customers.  The adoption of
SFAS No. 131 did not affect  results of operations or financial  position or the
segments we reported in 1998 and 1999.

In  June  1998,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  issued  SFAS  No.
133,"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133
requires  that  an  entity   recognize  all  derivatives  as  either  assets  or
liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments
at fair value.  It further  provides  criteria for derivative  instruments to be
designated as fair value, cash flow and foreign currency hedges, and establishes
respective  accounting  standards for reporting changes in the fair value of the
instruments.  The statement is effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2000. Upon adoption of SFAS

- -17-

<PAGE>

No. 133, we will be required to adjust hedging  instruments to fair value in the
balance  sheet,  and  recognize  the  offsetting  gain  or  loss  as  transition
adjustments  to be  reported  in net income or other  comprehensive  income,  as
appropriate,  and presented in a manner  similar to the  cumulative  effect of a
change in accounting  principle.  We believe the adoption of this statement will
not have a significant effect on our results of operations.

Current pending litigation,  administrative proceedings and claims are set forth
in Part II, Item 1 - Legal Proceedings. The Company intends to vigorously defend
itself in the litigation and claims and,  subject to the inherent  uncertainties
of litigation and based upon discovery  completed to date,  management  believes
that the resolution of these matters will not have a material  adverse effect on
the Company's  financial position.  However,  should the outcome of any of these
actions be  unfavorable,  the  Company  may be required to pay damages and other
expenses,  or may be enjoined from  manufacturing or selling any products deemed
to  infringe  the  intellectual  property  rights of others,  which could have a
material  adverse  effect  on the  Company's  financial  position  or  operating
results.  Moreover,  the  semiconductor  industry is  characterized  by frequent
claims and litigation  regarding patent and other intellectual  property rights.
The Company has from time to time received,  and believes that it likely will in
the  future  receive,  notices  alleging  that the  Company's  products,  or the
processes used to manufacture the Company's products,  infringe the intellectual
property rights of third parties, and the Company is subject to the risk that it
may become party to litigation  involving such claims (the Company  currently is
involved in patent  litigation).  In the event of  litigation  to determine  the
validity of any third-party claims (such as the current patent  litigation),  or
claims  against  the  Company for  indemnification  related to such  third-party
claims,  such  litigation,  whether or not  determined  in favor of the Company,
could result in significant expense to the Company and divert the efforts of the
Company's technical and management personnel from other matters. In the event of
an adverse ruling in such litigation, the Company might be required to cease the
manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, discontinue the use of certain
processes,  expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or
obtain licenses to the infringing  technology.  In addition,  depending upon the
number of  infringing  products  and the extent of sales of such  products,  the
Company could suffer significant  monetary damages. In the event of a successful
claim  against  the Company  and the  Company's  failure to develop or license a
substitute  technology,  the  Company's  operating  results  could be materially
adversely affected.

The Company also, as a result of an antidumping proceeding commenced in February
1997,  must pay a cash deposit equal to 50.15% of the entered value of any SRAMs
manufactured  (wafer  fabrication) in Taiwan, in order to import such goods into
the U.S.  Although the Company may be refunded such deposits in the future,  the
deposit  requirement,  and the potential  that all entries of  Taiwan-fabricated
SRAMs from October 1, 1997 through March 31, 1999 will be liquidated at the bond
rate or deposit rate in effect at the time of entry,  may  materially  adversely
affect the  Company's  ability to sell in the United  States SRAMs  manufactured
(wafer  fabrication) in Taiwan.  The Company  manufactures  (wafer  fabrication)
SRAMs in Singapore  (and has  manufactured  SRAMs in Japan as well),  and may be
able to support its U.S. customers with such products,  which are not subject to
antidumping duties. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be
able to do so.

In October 1998, Micron Technology,  Inc. filed an antidumping petition with the
DOC  and the  ITC,  alleging  that  dynamic  random  access  memories  ("DRAMs")
fabricated  in Taiwan  are  being  sold in the  United  States at less than fair
value, and that the United States industry producing DRAMs is materially injured
or threatened with material  injury by reason of imports of DRAMs  fabricated in
Taiwan. The petition requests the United States government to impose antidumping
duties on  imports  into the United  States of DRAMs  fabricated  in Taiwan.  In
December  1998,  the ITC  preliminarily  determined  that there is a  reasonable
indication that the imports of the products under investigation are injuring the
United States industry.  The Company received a questionnaire  from the DOC, and
responded to such questionnaire in accordance with the established  deadline. In
January 1999,  the DOC decided to limit the number of  respondents  investigated
and notified Alliance that it would not be separately investigated.  In May 1999
the DOC issued a preliminary  affirmative  determination of dumping.  Under that
determination,  the  Company's  imports  into  the  United  States  on or  after
approximately  May 28,  1999 of DRAMs  fabricated  in Taiwan  are  subject to an
antidumping  duty deposit in the amount of 16.65% (the  preliminary "all others"
rate) of the entered value of such DRAMs,  an antidumping  margin  calculated by
weight-averaging the antidumping margins of individually investigated respondent
companies.  The  Company  posted a bond to cover  deposits on such  entries.  In
October 1999 the DOC issued a final affirmative  determination of dumping. Under
that  determination,  the  Company's  imports into the United States on or after
October 19,  1999 of DRAMs  fabricated  in Taiwan are subject to an  antidumping
duty  deposit  in the  amount of  21.35%,  (the  final  "all-others"  rate).  At
September 30, 1999,  the Company had posted a bond secured by a letter of credit
in the amount of $1.0 million to cover  deposits on such entries.  The ITC final
determination of injury is due December 2, 1999. If the ITC final  determination
of injury is affirmative,  the DOC will issue an antidumping  duty order.  Under
any such

                                      -16-

<PAGE>

order, the Company's imports of  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs into the United States
on or after the date the order is published will be subject to a cash deposit in
the amount of the final "all others" rate of the entered value of such DRAMs. If
the ITC's final determination is negative, the investigation will be terminated,
the suspension of liquidation  lifted, and the bond released.  If an antidumping
order is issued,  in late 2000 the Company will have an opportunity to request a
review of its  sales of  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs  from  approximately  May 1999
through  December  2000 (the  "Review  Period").  If the  Company  makes  such a
request,  the amount of antidumping  duties,  if any, owed on entries during the
Review  Period will remain  undetermined  until the  conclusion of the review in
late 2001, which would determine a company-specific  antidumping duty margin. If
the DOC found,  based upon  analysis of the  Company's  sales  during the Review
Period,  that  antidumping  duties  either  should  not be  imposed or should be
imposed at a lower  rate than the final  "all  others"  rate  determined  in the
original  investigation,  the  difference  between the cash deposits made by the
Company,  and the  deposits  that would have been made had the lower rate (or no
rate, as the case may be) been in effect, would be returned to the Company, with
interest. If, on the other hand, the DOC found a higher Company-specific margin,
the Company would have to pay the  difference  between the cash deposits paid by
the Company and the deposits  that would have been made had the higher rate been
in effect,  with interest.  A material portion of the DRAMs designed and sold by
the Company are  fabricated  in Taiwan,  and the cash  deposit  requirement  and
possibility  of  assessment of  antidumping  duties could  materially  adversely
affect  the  Company's  ability  to sell  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs in the United
States and have a material adverse effect on the Company's operating results and
financial condition.

The Company has made and will  continue to make  investments  in emerging,  high
technology companies such as Maverick Networks and others. There is no guarantee
that these  companies  will be  successful  or that the Company will recover its
investments.

As a result of the foregoing  factors,  as well as other  factors  affecting the
Company's  operating results,  past performance should not be considered to be a
reliable indicator of future performance and investors should not use historical
trends to anticipate  results or trends in future  periods.  In addition,  stock
prices for many  technology  companies  are subject to  significant  volatility,
particularly  on a  quarterly  basis.  If  revenues  or  earnings  fail  to meet
expectations  of the  investment  community,  there  could be an  immediate  and
significant impact on the market price of the Company's Common Stock.

Due to the  foregoing  factors,  it is likely  that in some  future  quarter  or
quarters the Company's operating results may be below the expectations of public
market analysts and investors.  In such event, the price of the Company's Common
Stock would likely be materially and adversely affected.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's  operating  activities  utilized cash of $8.1 million in first six
months of fiscal  2000  compared  to $22.7  million  in the first six  months of
fiscal 1999.  Cash  utilized in operating  activities in the first six months of
fiscal  2000 was the  result  of an  increase  in  inventory  related  to higher
anticipated  sales and higher wafer  prices.  Cash utilized in operations in the
first six months of fiscal 1999 was primarily a result of a loss from operations
and changes in working capital accounts during the first six months.

Net cash  provided by  investing  activities  was $9.7 million for the first six
months of fiscal 2000 and net cash  provided by investing  activities  was $27.0
million  for the same period of fiscal  1999.  Net cash  provided  by  investing
activities  in the for the first six  months of fiscal  2000 was a result of the
proceeds  from  the sale of  Broadcom  shares  of  approximately  $18.1  million
partially  offset  by  investments  of $7.5  million  in a  number  of  start-up
companies whose focus is emerging networking and internet market segments, where
the  Company  can  leverage  its core  competencies  in memory  technology,  and
equipment purchases of $0.8 million.  Net cash provided by investing  activities
in the first six months of fiscal 1999  reflects the  proceeds  from the sale of
USC shares of $31.7  million,  partially  offset by equipment  purchases of $1.0
million and $3.1 million investment in United Silicon, Inc.

The Company's  financing  activities  provided cash of $6.7 million in the first
six months of fiscal 2000 and used cash of $0.1  million in the first six months
of fiscal  1999.  Net cash  provided by  financing  activities  in the first six
months of fiscal 2000 reflects  proceeds from employee stock option exercises of
$5.9 million and restricted cash of $1.5 million,  partially offset by repayment
of long-term obligations of $0.7 million.

                                      -19-

<PAGE>

On May 31,  1999,  Maverick  Networks  (an entity in which the Company had a 28%
interest in) completed a transaction with Broadcom Corporation, resulting in the
Company  selling its  ownership  interest in Maverick  Networks in exchange  for
538,961 shares of Broadcom's Class B common stock.  Based on Broadcom's  closing
share  price on the date of sale,  the  Company  recorded a pre-tax  gain in the
first quarter of fiscal 2000 of approximately  $51.6 million,  which is included
in  Other  Income,  net.  Subsequent  to the  transaction  date,  the  Company's
investment in Broadcom  Corporation  is being be accounted for as "available for
sale"  securities  in  accordance  with  FAS  115.  According  to the  Company's
agreement with Broadcom,  10% or 53,896 shares of Broadcom stock will be held in
escrow for six months until November 30,1999 to potentially  compensate Broadcom
for losses, if any, Broadcom may incur if Maverick breaches the merger agreement
or misrepresented information in the transaction. During the first six months of
fiscal 2000,  the Company sold 150,000  shares of Broadcom  stock and realized a
pre-tax gain of approximately $3.7 million. At September 30, 1999, the Company's
unrealized  gain in Broadcom is $6.6 million,  which has been  recorded,  net of
tax, as other comprehensive income.

At September  30, 1999,  the Company had $14.5  million in cash,  an increase of
$8.3 million  from March 31,  1999,  and working  capital of $79.0  million,  an
increase of $57.0 million from March 31, 1999. Included in this $79.0 million of
working capital is marketable  securities of  approximately  $43.8 million.  The
Company   believes  that  these  sources  of  liquidity,   and  other  financing
opportunities  available to it, will be sufficient to meet its projected working
capital and other cash requirements for the foreseeable future.

In order to obtain an adequate supply of wafers,  especially wafers manufactured
using  advanced  process  technologies,  the Company  has entered  into and will
continue to consider various possible transactions, including equity investments
in or loans to foundries in exchange for  guaranteed  production  capacity,  the
formation of joint ventures to own and operate foundries,  or the usage of "take
or pay"  contracts that commit the Company to purchase  specified  quantities of
wafers  over  extended  periods.  Manufacturing  arrangements  such as these may
require substantial capital  investments,  which may require the Company to seek
additional  equity  or debt  financing.  There  can be no  assurance  that  such
additional  financing,  if  required,  will be  available  when  needed  or,  if
available, will be on satisfactory terms. Additionally,  the Company has entered
into and will  continue  to  enter  into  various  transactions,  including  the
licensing of its integrated  circuit designs in exchange for royalties,  fees or
guarantees of manufacturing capacity.

In  February  1995,   the  Company  agreed  to  purchase   shares  of  Chartered
Semiconductor  ("Chartered") for approximately  US$10 million and entered into a
manufacturing  agreement  under which Chartered will provide a minimum number of
wafers  from its 8-inch  wafer  fabrication  facility  known as "Fab2." In April
1995, the Company agreed to purchase  additional  shares in Chartered,  bringing
the total agreed  investment in Chartered to  approximately  US$51.6 million and
Chartered agreed to provide an increased minimum number of wafers to be provided
by Chartered  from Fab2.  The Company has paid all  installments  to  Chartered.
Chartered  went  public on the NASDAQ  stock  exchange on October  26,1999.  The
Company owns  approximately  2.14 million American  Depository  Shares, or ADSs.
Each ADS  represents  the right to ten ordinary  shares,  subject to a six-month
"lock-up," or no trade period.  Based on the November 12, 1999 closing price for
Chartered shares the estimated value of this investment is $102 million.

In July 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with United Microelectronics
Corporation  ("UMC")  and S3  Incorporated  ("S3") to form a separate  Taiwanese
company,  United Semiconductor  Corporation ("USC"), for the purpose of building
and  managing an 8-inch  semiconductor  manufacturing  facility  in Taiwan.  The
Company paid  approximately 1 billion New Taiwan Dollars ("NTD")  (approximately
US$36.4 million) in September 1995, approximately NTD 450 million (approximately
US$16.4 million) in July 1996, and approximately NTD 492 million  (approximately
US$17.6  million)  in July  1997.  After the last  payment,  the  Company  owned
approximately 190 million shares of USC, or approximately 19% of the outstanding
shares. In April 1998, the Company sold 35 million shares of USC to an affiliate
of UMC and received  approximately  US$31.7 million. In connection with the sale
of 35 million  shares of USC, the Company has the right to receive up to another
665 million NTD  (approximately  US$20.9 million at the exchange rate prevailing
on  October  1,  1999,  which  rate is  subject  to  material  change)  upon the
occurrence of certain  potential  future events.  After the April 1998 sale, the
Company owned  approximately  15.5% of the outstanding shares of USC. In October
1998,  USC  issued  46  million  shares  to  the  Company  by  way  of  dividend
distribution. Additionally, USC made a stock distribution to its employees. As a
result of this distribution, the Company's ownership in USC was reduced to 15.1%
of the  outstanding  shares.  In April 1999, USC issued 46 million shares to the
Company  by way of  dividend  distribution  as well as  distributions  to  other
entities.  As a result of these  distributions,  the Company owned approximately
14.8% of the outstanding

                                      -20-

<PAGE>

shares. To the extent USC experiences operating income or losses and the Company
maintains its current ownership  percentage of outstanding  shares,  the Company
will  recognize  its  proportionate  share of such income or losses.  During the
first six months of fiscal 2000, the Company  recorded $4.3 million of equity in
income of USC, as compared to $7.2 million  recorded during the first six months
of fiscal 1999.

In October  1995,  the  Company  entered  into an  agreement  with UMC and other
parties to form a separate Taiwanese company,  USIC, for the purpose of building
and  managing an 8-inch  semiconductor  manufacturing  facility  in Taiwan.  The
Company had originally committed to an investment of approximately US$60 million
or  10%  ownership  interest  but  subsequently  requested  that  its  level  of
participation be reduced by 50%. The first  installment of approximately  50% of
the revised  investment,  or US$13.7 million,  was made in January 1996, and the
Company  had but did not  exercise  the  option to pay a second  installment  of
approximately  25% of the  revised  investment  payable in  December  1997.  The
Company made a third  installment  payment of approximately  106 million NTD (or
approximately  US$3.1 million) in July 1998.  After the third  installment,  the
Company owns  approximately  3.21% of the outstanding shares of USIC and has the
right  to  purchase  approximately  3.7% of the  manufacturing  capacity  of the
facility.

In June 1999,  UMC  announced  plans to merge four  semiconductor  wafer foundry
units, USC, USIC, United Integrated  Circuit  Corporation and UTEK Semiconductor
Corporation,  into UMC, a publicly  traded  company in Taiwan.  According to the
proposed terms of the merger,  Alliance will receive 247.7 million shares of UMC
stock for its 247.7 million shares or 14.76% ownership of USC and  approximately
35.6 million shares of UMC stock for its 48.1 million shares or 3.21%  ownership
of USIC.  UMC has indicated that they expect to have  approximately  8.8 billion
shares  outstanding as of the closing date of the merger.  Based on the November
12, 1999  closing  price for UMC shares of NTD 86.00,  and the then current U.S.
dollar  exchange rate of 31.72,  the  estimated  value of these  investments  is
approximately  $768  million.  At  September  30,  1999 the book value for these
investments  was   approximately   $105  million.   The  merger  is  subject  to
shareholders  and government  approval and is expected to close in January 2000.
According to Taiwanese laws and regulations, 50% of the 283.3 million UMC shares
Alliance expects to receive will be subject to a six-month "lock-up" or no trade
period.  Of the  remaining  50%, or 141.6  million  shares,  approximately  28.3
million shares will become  eligible for sale two years from the closing date of
the  transaction,  with 28.3 million shares  available for sale every six months
thereafter during years three and four.

The Company has invested  approximately $7.5 million during the first six months
of  fiscal  2000 in a number  of  start-up  companies  whose  focus is  emerging
networking and internet market segments, where the Company can leverage its core
competencies  in  memory  technology.   The  Company  accounts  each  of  theses
investments using the cost method of accounting.

                                      -21-

<PAGE>

================================================================================
Part II - Other Information

ITEM 1
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1996, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and
certain of its officers and directors  and others in the United States  District
Court for the Northern  District of California,  alleging  violations of Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5
promulgated  thereunder.  The complaint alleged that the Company, N.D. Reddy and
C.N.  Reddy also had  liability  under  Section  20(a) of the Exchange  Act. The
complaint,  brought by an individual who claimed to have purchased 100 shares of
the Company's common stock on November 2, 1995, was putatively brought on behalf
of a class of persons who purchased the Company's  common stock between July 11,
1995 and December 29, 1995. In April 1997,  the Court  dismissed the  complaint,
with  leave to file an  amended  complaint.  In June  1997,  plaintiff  filed an
amended  complaint against the Company and certain of its officers and directors
alleging  violations  of Sections  10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange  Act. In July
1997,  The Company moved to dismiss the amended  complaint.  In March 1998,  the
court ruled in defendants' favor as to all claims but one, and dismissed all but
one claim with prejudice. In April 1998, defendants requested reconsideration of
the  ruling  as to the one  claim  not  dismissed.  In June  1998,  the  parties
stipulated to dismiss the remaining  claim without  prejudice,  on the condition
that in the event the dismissal  with  prejudice of the other claims is affirmed
in its entirety,  such remaining claim shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice.
In June 1998,  the court entered  judgment  dismissing  the case pursuant to the
parties'  stipulation.  The Company  intends to  continue  to defend  vigorously
against  any  claims  asserted  against  it,  and  believes  it has  meritorious
defenses. Due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, the Company is not able
to  reasonably  estimate the potential  losses,  if any, that may be incurred in
relation to this litigation.

In December 1996, Alliance Semiconductor  International  Corporation ("ASIC"), a
wholly-owned  subsidiary  of the Company  was served  with a complaint  filed in
Federal Court  alleging that ASIC has infringed two patents owned by AMD related
to flash memory devices,  and seeking  injunctive  relief and damages.  In March
1997, the Company was added as a defendant. In April 1996, the Court allowed AMD
to expand  its  claims to  include  several  new flash  products  which had been
recently  announced by the  Company.  A trial date has been set by the Court for
June 2000.  Each  defendant  has denied the  allegations  of the  complaint  and
asserted a counterclaim  for declaration that each of the AMD patents is invalid
and not infringed by such defendant. The Company believes that the resolution of
this matter will not have a material  adverse effect on the financial  condition
of the Company.

In July 1998, the Company learned that a default judgment may be entered against
the Company in Canada, in the amount of approximately  US$170 million, in a case
filed in 1985 captioned  Prabhakara  Chowdary Balla and TritTek Research Ltd. v.
Fitch Research  Corporation,  et al., British Columbia Supreme Court No. 85-2805
(Victoria Registry).  The Company,  which had previously not participated in the
case,  believes  that it never was properly  served with process in this action,
and that the Canadian court lacks  jurisdiction over the Company in this matter.
In  addition to  jurisdictional  and  procedural  arguments,  the  Company  also
believes it may have grounds to argue that the claims against the Company should
be deemed discharged by the Company's  bankruptcy in 1991. In February 1999, the
court set aside the default  judgment  against the Company.  In April 1999,  the
plaintiffs  were granted leave by the Court to appeal this judgment.  The appeal
brief and reply  briefs have been filed and the parties are  awaiting a decision
by the appeals court.

                                      -22-


<PAGE>


ITEM 4
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

An annual  meeting of the  stockholders  of the  Company  was held on August 31,
1999.  Company's  stockholders  elected the Board's nominees as directors by the
votes indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
           NOMINEE                   VOTES FOR             VOTES WITHHELD

<S>                                 <C>                      <C>
           N. Damodar Reddy         35,658,380               2,013,573
           C. N. Reddy              35,445,030               2,226,923
           Jon B. Minnis            35,443,691               2,228,262
           Stanford L. Kane         35,444,341               2,227,612
</TABLE>

The  proposal to amend the  Company's  1992 Stock Plan to increase the number of
shares of common stock reserved for issuance by 2,000,000 shares, from 9,000,000
to 11,000,000  shares was ratified  with  28,523,961  votes in favor,  9,084,828
against and 63,164 abstentions.

The  selection  of  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP  as  the  Company's  independent
auditors was ratified with 37,298,660 votes in favor, 328,318 against and 44,975
abstentions.


ITEM 5
OTHER INFORMATION

In February 1997, Micron Technology, Inc. filed an antidumping petition with the
United  States   International   Trade  Commission  ("ITC")  and  United  States
Department of Commerce  ("DOC"),  alleging  that static  random access  memories
("SRAMs") fabricated in Taiwan were being sold in the United States at less than
fair value,  and that the United States industry  producing SRAMs was materially
injured  or  threatened  with  material  injury by reason  of  imports  of SRAMs
fabricated in Taiwan. After a final affirmative DOC determination of dumping and
a final affirmative ITC determination of injury,  DOC issued an antidumping duty
order in April 1998.  Under that order,  the  Company's  imports into the United
States on or after approximately April 16,1998 of SRAMs fabricated in Taiwan are
subject to a cash deposit in the amount of 50.15% (the "Antidumping  Margin") of
the entered  value of such SRAMs.  (The  Company  posted a bond in the amount of
59.06%  (the  preliminary  margin)  with  respect  to its  importation,  between
approximately  October 1997 and April 1998,  of SRAMs  fabricated in Taiwan.) In
May 1998,  the Company and others filed an appeal in the United  States Court of
International  Trade (the "CIT"),  challenging the determination by the ITC that
imports of  Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs were  causing  material  injury to the U.S.
industry.  On June  30,  1999 the CIT  issued a  decision  remanding  the  ITC's
affirmative material injury  determination to the ITC for  reconsideration.  The
ITC's  remand  determination   reaffirmed  its  original  determination  and  is
currently  being  considered  by the CIT. The decision of the CIT can be further
appealed  to the Court of Appeals for the Federal  Circuit.  The Company  cannot
predict either the timing or the eventual  results of the appeal.  Until a final
judgment  is entered in the  appeal,  no final  duties  will be  assessed on the
Company's  entries of SRAMs from  Taiwan  covered  by the DOC  antidumping  duty
order. If the appeal is successful, the antidumping order will be terminated and
cash deposits will be refunded with interest. If the appeal is unsuccessful, the
Company's entries of Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs from October 1, 1997 through March
31, 1999 will be  liquidated at the deposit rate in effect at the time of entry.
On subsequent entries of  Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs, the Company will continue to
make cash deposits in the amount of 50.15% of the entered value.  In April 2000,
the  Company  will  have an  opportunity  to  request  a review  of its sales of
Taiwan-fabricated  SRAMs from April 1, 1999 through  March 31, 2000 (the "Review
Period").  If it does so,  the amount of  antidumping  duties,  if any,  owed on
imports from April 1999 through  March 2000 will remain  undetermined  until the
conclusion of the review in early 2001. If the DOC found, based upon analysis of
the Company's  sales during the Review Period,  that  antidumping  duties either
should not be imposed or should be imposed at a lower rate than the  Antidumping
Margin,  the difference  between the cash deposits made by the Company,  and the
deposits  that would have been made had the lower rate (or no rate,  as the case
may be) been in effect, would be returned to the Company, plus interest.  If, on
the other hand, the DOC found that higher margins were appropriate,  the Company
would have to pay  difference  between the cash deposits paid by the Company and
the  deposits  that would have been made had the higher  rate been in effect.  A
material portion of the SRAMs designed and sold by the Company are fabricated in
Taiwan,  and the cash deposit  requirement  and  possibility  of  assessment  of
antidumping  duties could materially  adversely affect the Company's  ability to
sell Taiwan-fabricated SRAMs in the United States and have a material

                                      -23-

<PAGE>

adverse effect on the Company's  operating results and financial  condition.  At
September 30, 1999,  the Company had posted a bond secured by a letter of credit
in the amount of approximately $1.7 million and made cash deposits in the amount
of $1.7 million  relating to the Company's  importation  of  Taiwan-manufactured
SRAMs.

In October 1998, Micron Technology,  Inc. filed an antidumping petition with the
DOC  and the  ITC,  alleging  that  dynamic  random  access  memories  ("DRAMs")
fabricated  in Taiwan  are  being  sold in the  United  States at less than fair
value, and that the United States industry producing DRAMs is materially injured
or threatened with material  injury by reason of imports of DRAMs  fabricated in
Taiwan. The petition requests the United States government to impose antidumping
duties on  imports  into the United  States of DRAMs  fabricated  in Taiwan.  In
December  1998,  the ITC  preliminarily  determined  that there is a  reasonable
indication that the imports of the products under investigation are injuring the
United States industry.  The Company received a questionnaire  from the DOC, and
responded to such questionnaire in accordance with the established  deadline. In
January 1999,  the DOC decided to limit the number of  respondents  investigated
and notified Alliance that it would not be separately investigated.  In May 1999
the DOC issued a preliminary  affirmative  determination of dumping.  Under that
determination,  the Company's imports into the United States on or after May 28,
1999 of DRAMs fabricated in Taiwan are subject to an antidumping duty deposit in
the amount of 16.65% (the preliminary "all others" rate) of the entered value of
such DRAMs, an antidumping margin calculated by weight-averaging the antidumping
margins of individually  investigated respondent companies. The Company posted a
bond to cover  deposits on such entries.  In October 1999 the DOC issued a final
affirmative  determination of dumping.  Under that determination,  the Company's
imports into the United States on or after October 19, 1999 of DRAMs  fabricated
in Taiwan are subject to an  antidumping  duty  deposit in the amount of 21.35%,
(the final "all-others"  rate). ). At September 30, 1999, the Company had posted
a bond  secured  by a letter of credit in the  amount of $1.0  million  to cover
deposits on such entries.  The ITC final determination of injury is due December
2, 1999. If the ITC final  determination of injury is affirmative,  the DOC will
issue an antidumping duty order.  Under any such order, the Company's imports of
Taiwan-fabricated DRAMs into the United States on or after the date the order is
published  will be  subject  to a cash  deposit  in the amount of the final "all
others"  rate  of  the  entered  value  of  such  DRAMs.   If  the  ITC's  final
determination is negative, the investigation will be terminated,  the suspension
of liquidation  lifted,  and the bond released.  If an antidumping duty order is
issued, in late 2000 the Company will have an opportunity to request a review of
its  sales of  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs  from  approximately  May  1999  through
December 2000 (the "Review  Period").  If the Company makes such a request,  the
amount of antidumping  duties,  if any, owed on entries during the Review Period
will remain  undetermined until the conclusion of the review in late 2001, which
would determine a  Company-specific  antidumping duty margin.  If the DOC found,
based upon  analysis  of the  Company's  sales  during the Review  Period,  that
antidumping  duties either should not be imposed or should be imposed at a lower
rate than the final "all others" rate determined in the original  investigation,
the difference  between the cash deposits made by the Company,  and the deposits
that would  have been made had the lower  rate (or no rate,  as the case may be)
been in effect,  would be returned to the  Company,  with  interest.  If, on the
other hand, the DOC found a higher Company-specific rate, the Company would have
to pay the  difference  between  the cash  deposits  paid by the Company and the
deposits  that  would have been made had the  higher  rate been in effect,  with
interest.  (The Company also would be responsible for antidumping  duties in the
amount of the  revised  margin with  respect to its imports  covered by bond.) A
material portion of the DRAMs designed and sold by the Company are fabricated in
Taiwan,  and the cash deposit  requirement  and  possibility  of  assessment  of
antidumping  duties could materially  adversely affect the Company's  ability to
sell  Taiwan-fabricated  DRAMs in the United States and have a material  adverse
effect on the Company's operating results and financial condition.


ITEM 6
EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

      (a)  Exhibits:

             Exhibit     Document Description
             Number
           ------------  ------------------------------------------------
              27.01      Financial Data Schedule (filed only with the electronic
                         submission  of Form 10-Q in  accordance  with the EDGAR
                         requirements)

      (b)  No reports on Form 8-K were filed  during  quarter  ended  October 2,
           1999.

                                      -24-

<PAGE>

================================================================================
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the  requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934,  the  Registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                          ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION


November 16, 1999         By: /S/ N. DAMODAR REDDY
                              -------------------------------------
                              N. Damodar Reddy
                              Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
                              Executive Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer)


November 16, 1999          By: /S/ DAVID EICHLER
                               -------------------------------------
                               David Eichler
                               Vice President, Finance and Administration
                               and Chief Financial Officer
                               (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


                                      -25-

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Alliance Semiconductor Corporation Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000913293
<NAME>                        Alliance Semiconductor
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-4-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-2-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         14,538
<SECURITIES>                                   47,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                   298
<INVENTORY>                                    26,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,632
<PP&E>                                         23,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,566
<BONDS>                                        0
                          0
                                    0
<COMMON>                                       421
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,295
<SALES>                                        36,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,823
<CGS>                                          24,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                53,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            53,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      4,328
<NET-INCOME>                                   57,861
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.36



</TABLE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission